Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for standing by, and welcome to the Dycom Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Also, as a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to your host, Mr. Steven Nielsen. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Good morning, everyone. I'd like to thank you for attending this conference call to review our fourth quarter fiscal 2013 results. During the call, we will be referring to a slide presentation, which can be found on our website, www.dycomind.com, under the heading Events. Relevant slides will be identified by number throughout our presentation. Going to Slide 2. Today we have on the call, Tim Estes, our Chief Operating Officer; Drew DeFerrari, our Chief Financial Officer; and Rick Vilsoet, our General Counsel. Now I will turn the call over to Rick Vilsoet.

Thank you, Steve. Referring to Slide 3. Except for historical information, the statements made by company management during this call may be forward-looking and are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements, including those related to the company's outlook, are based on management's current expectations, estimates and projections and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties, which may cause the company's actual results in future periods to differ materially from forecasted results. Those risks and uncertainties are more fully described in the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 28, 2012, the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 27, 2013 and other periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The company assumes no obligation to update forward-looking statements. Steve?

Thanks, Rick. Now moving to Slide 4 and a review of our fourth quarter results. As you review these results, please note that we have presented revenue amounts that exclude certain revenues, including those from acquired subsidiaries, adjusted EBITDA and adjusted EPS, all of which are non-GAAP financial measures and our release and comments. See Slides 13 through 17 for a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to the GAAP measures in the slide presentation provided for this call. For clarity and to ensure comparability between periods, our comments will now address our non-GAAP results. Revenue for the quarter increased year-over-year to $478.6 million, an increase of 50.5%. After excluding revenues from acquired subsidiaries of $139.1 million from the current quarter and $2.3 million of storm restoration revenues in the year ago quarter, revenue grew 7.5% organically. Volumes during the quarter were solid from telephone companies, as a whole, with some companies growing meaningfully, while all carefully managed routine capital and maintenance expenditures. And spending by cable customers increased year-over-year. Gross margins were down slightly year-over-year, reflecting stable operating trends, offset in part by significant inclement weather. Despite integration costs of approximately $1.1 million, general and administrative expenses declined 33 basis points, as a percentage of revenue year-over-year, reflecting continued good cost discipline. All of these factors produced adjusted EBITDA of $58.1 million for the fourth quarter or 12.1% of revenue. Net income of $0.44 per share for fourth quarter increased from last year's earnings per share of $0.39, despite a $1.8 million year-over-year decrease in other income, resulting from reduced asset sales, as well as acquisition integration expenses of $1.1 million. Amortization expense increased approximately $5.5 million. And liquidity was solid with cash and availability under our current credit facility, totaling $197.9 million, after the purchase of Sage Telecommunications in…

Thanks, Steve, and good morning, everyone. As a reminder, in today's conference call materials, there is disclosure of certain non-GAAP measures, including items such as organic revenue growth and adjusted EBITDA. In the materials, we have provided a reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the comparable GAAP measures. Going to Slide 7. Contract revenues for Q4 were $478.6 million, including revenue from acquired subsidiaries of $139.1 million. On a consolidated basis, approximately 88% of our revenue came from our telecommunications customers. Diluted EPS, non-GAAP, for the current quarter was $0.44 per share compared to $0.39 per share for Q4 2012, reflecting growth in total EBITDA, offset in part by incremental depreciation, amortization and interest combined with lower other income. Turning to Slide 8. Revenue grew organically 7.5% from increases in services for wireless providers and growth within existing contracts. Adjusted EBITDA, non-GAAP, was at $58.1 million or 12.1% of revenue, a 43% increase from Q4 '12 amount of $40.5 million. This growth resulted from expansion in organic operations and contributions of our recently acquired businesses. Depreciation and amortization were up year-over-year, primarily, from the results of the acquired subsidiaries. And for everyone's reference, we have included Slide #18 in the back of today's presentation, which provides the estimated future amortization for all of Dycom's intangibles. Interest expense increased to $6.8 million from incremental debt associated with the funding of our fiscal 2013 acquisitions. Other income declined to $1.1 million compared to last year, as a result of reduced asset sales. Our year-to-date effective tax rate was approximately 39.5%. For fiscal 2014, we expect our effective tax rate to continue near the same level. Turning to Slide 9. Our balance sheet remains strong, and our liquidity is robust. Cash flows during the period were dedicated to funding our growth. We ended the period with approximately $18.6 million of cash on hand. Capital expenditures net of disposals were $17.5 million. Gross CapEx was approximately $18.9 million. For fiscal 2014, we expect CapEx, net of disposals, to range from $70 million to $75 million. During Q4, we acquired Sage Telecommunications and a wireless construction contractor. Acquisition payments totaled $11.3 million on a combined basis and resulted in goodwill of approximately $5 million and amortizing intangible assets of approximately $5.6 million. On our senior credit facility, there was $121.9 million of term loan borrowings and $49 million of revolver borrowings outstanding. We ended the period with full availability of $179.3 million under the facility after providing for $46.7 million of outstanding letters of credit. At the end of Q4 2013, we had approximately 33.3 million shares of common stock outstanding. On a fully diluted basis, weighted average shares were approximately 34.1 million shares. Now I will turn the call back to Steve.

Thanks, Drew. Moving to Slide 10. In summary, within an improving economy, we experienced the effects of a solid industry environment and capitalized on our significant strengths. First and foremost, we maintained solid customer relationships throughout our markets. We continued to win projects and extend contracts of attractive pricing. Secondly, the strength of those relationships and the extensive market presence they have created has allowed us to be at the forefront of evolving industry opportunities. The end market drivers of these opportunities remain firm and are strengthening. Industry participants continue to aggressively extend fiber networks for wireless backhaul services. These services are now playing for small cells as well as macro cells. Dramatically increasing wireless data traffic may prompt further wireline deployments. Cable operators are continuing to deploy fiber to small and medium businesses. And with increasing urgency, some are doing so in anticipation of the customer sales process. Wireless carriers are upgrading to 4G technologies, creating meaningful growth opportunities in the near to intermediate term, as well as planning to increase macro cell density. And finally, telephone companies are deploying fiber-to-the-home or node technologies to enable video offerings. These deployments are accelerating and impacting our business. As we look out over the intermediate term, we are increasingly encouraged that these current end market drivers are but harbingers of an emerging industry-wide consensus that network bandwidth, both wireline and wireless, needs to increase dramatically in response to consumer demand and competitive realities. Previous periods in which industry consensus has changed sharply, such as dial-up to broadband, broadband to fiber deep or fiber-to-the-home and cellular voice to wireless data have been accompanied by significant growth opportunities for us. We are hopeful that this potentially looming transition may be as or more rewarding than previous industry transitions, given our scale and market…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from the line of Saagar Parikh with KeyBanc Capital Markets.

First off, on Sage Communications (sic) [Telecommunications], could you go through a little bit on the amount of revenue contribution that we'll be seeing this year, along with key customers, and maybe the difference between Sage Communications and your NeoCom Solutions subsidiary?

On an annual run-rate basis, it's somewhat in excess of $20 million. And the primary customer is Comcast, and so the services they offer are construction and maintenance services to the cable industry.

Okay, great. And second question for me, your organic growth has been ramping up for 4 quarters now, and its highest mark in the last 4 quarters, this quarter is 7.5%. Where do you really see that going now? And what makes you believe it's sustainable, and why?

I think we've done a good job as the stimulus work is coming in, that we picked up lots of other business inside of our existing contracts, as well as grown our wireless business. And I think as we see that stimulus work play out over the next 2 or 3 quarters, we will continue to be able to grow organically. When that concludes, then I think we'll have, essentially, no headwinds in the business. And, in fact, as we talked about in our comments, I mean, I think we see in the increasing industry appetite to consider 1 gigabit wireline connections and increase wireless data speeds. I think we see more future potential catalysts now than we had in a number of years.

Okay. And then last question for me, your Wireless business, could you break out the amount of revenue contribution in the fiscal fourth quarter? And what the annual run rate can be for fiscal '14?

Well, it was just in excess of $50 million. We expect that to go up. But as you know, we provide guidance a quarter at a time, and so other than to say that we're pleased with the business, we see a number of growth opportunities. So we think it grows, but we're not going to provide full '14 guidance just for one piece of the business.

And our next question comes from the line of John Rogers with D.A. Davidson. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: A couple of things. First of all, in terms of the backlog growth that you saw in the quarter, is there a change with your customers and that they're -- I mean, it looks like they're looking out a little further, making longer commitments.

I think, generally, John, we saw a number of customers renewing agreements. In one case, the customer had been on a 2-year cycle. They went to a 3-year cycle, generally. I think, we are also just seeing the level of activity and the existing book of business increase, and that will feed through to backlog as we continue. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. And then, Steve, I mean, as I looked over second quarter reports from some of the customers and some of them that give guidance on CapEx, it looks like, sequentially, it's going to slow in the second half. And I know it all depends on mix and regions, but it doesn't sound like that's what you're seeing.

Yes, John. And then without kind of going through it, I mean, I would tell you, from what I recall, those releases, CenturyLink took the midpoint of their guidance range up on CapEx. I think Comcast had targeted 10% increase. They were below that for the first half of the year. And I would say, as we kind of talk to our folks and see what our customers' plans are, we get no sense that they're slowing down. Now clearly, there can be some lags. We had quite a bit of inclement weather in the May, June period. And so, sometimes that can impact when we see things. But I would say the bias, generally, was up -- Verizon took their CapEx up predominantly on the wireless side for the full year. So we feel good about the backdrop right now. John B. Rogers - D.A. Davidson & Co., Research Division: Okay. And just last, if I could, maybe if you or Drew could give us the rest of the customers and also the breakdown between telecom and cable.

Sure, John. This is Drew. So the split between telco and cable. The telco side is 67.6%. Cable was 20.7%. And then the next 5 after the top 5 are Charter at 4.8%; Time Warner Cable at 4.5%; Ericsson at 1.9%; Frontier at 1.8%; and then Montana Opticom, which was a rural project at 1.2%.

And our next question comes from the line of Adam Thalhimer with BB&T Capital Markets. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: And Steve, I wanted to ask mostly about gross margins, because, quite frankly, you're delivering on every other line of the income statement. In terms of your gross margin being 100 basis points below your expectations for the quarter, what was the primary variance there, in your mind?

I think the primary issue that we heard throughout the months of May and June was that there were impacts due to inclement weather. May we just add more loss, 9 days. Anybody who lives on the East Coast, particularly, in the Southeast, has seen a lot of rain. I think in some parts of that area, geography, they're kind of at full-year averages in August, so it was a little bit wetter. The acquired businesses were somewhat larger than we expected, and their margins are somewhat less than the legacy margins. And I think we've got a number of things that we're starting. We are seeing some of the stimulus project wind down. And so I just think there's going to be a little bit of rotational costs within the context of increasing opportunity as we go forward. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. Are the -- for the Quanta subsidiaries, are those margins up since you acquired Quanta?

Yes, I mean, that has, clearly, been seasonal improvement as we talked about, when we acquired them. They have a larger footprint in the upper Midwest, and -- which is more seasonal than our typical book of business. So yes, they've improved. We're comfortable with them. We think they can get better. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: How is that integration going, in general, versus your original expectations?

I think we've had very good cooperation from the folks. There's a lot of work to do. There are a number of systems that we continue to implement. And so, the effort goes on, but I think we feel better about the business every month that we own it. Adam R. Thalhimer - BB&T Capital Markets, Research Division: Okay. Last question for me. I wanted to ask you about the D&A outlook. And I just want to make sure I understand this, because -- so even though non-cash amortization comes down about $1 million in the back half of '14 versus the first quarter '14, you don't see a stair step function down in total D&A.

Drew?

Yes. Adam, it's Drew. I think there's -- it'll come down some, but there is depreciation that's coming through as well. And so I think that's the balance there. But we provided -- if you look at that back slide on #18, you'll see the amortization fees for the entire company.

And our next question comes from the line of Min Cho with FBC (sic) [FBR] Capital Markets. Min Cho - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: A couple of quick questions for you. First, it sounds -- we're hearing that Sprint is looking to potentially go more directly to the contractors versus through the OEMs. I'm just wondering if you're kind of seeing the same thing and wondering what the impact would be for you, especially given your scale at this point.

I think that widely anticipated in the industry. We, clearly, have some relationships there. The work needs to get done. And so, we look at it as an opportunity, but there's lots of opportunity in wireless right now, which that's one of them. Min Cho - FBR Capital Markets & Co., Research Division: Okay. And then, obviously, you're generating some good free cash flow, and we saw that you raised your share repurchase. Can you talk a little bit about the M&A pipeline? And, also, is there any chance that you'd be looking to add back to your utility locating business, given what we're seeing in the housing trend?

There are plenty of M&A opportunities that we're looking at. I think we continue to focus on integration. And we did do a nice -- a couple of nice small acquisitions in this quarter. We'll continue to be opportunistic. I think we are most excited in our business about the impact or the opportunities that we think will be generated if the industry kind of steps up its view on what the right network bandwidth to offer is. And so I think that's where we'll focus our attentions.

Our next question comes from the line of Simon Leopold with Raymond James. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: A couple of things I wanted to follow up on. One was the commentary on gross margin. Your guidance indicates you expect to down year-over-year and up sequentially on what could be similar revenue levels. So just wondering how much of that is maybe conservatism. And when you say up sequentially, I'm looking for a little bit more granularity, because the model is so sensitive to gross margin of how we should think about drivers for gross margin in the October quarter.

Yes, I think the drivers that you have to think about is we do have a number of stimulus projects rolling off. The first quarter of last year was the peak in the legacy business for stimulus. And so kind of that's a drag that we want to contemplate in the gross margin guidance. So I don't think we want to be aggressive. I mean, quite honestly, Simon, within the context of what we see coming down the road, kind of the intermediate term for the company, I mean, getting aggressive on the individual quarter just doesn't make sense to me. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: And that actually sets up my next question perfectly and that there's been recent awards for a new round of stimulus money under the Connect America Fund. Just like to hear your perspective of the timing in terms of your business, and how you quantify or gauge those new opportunities.

There's really 2 kind of a near-term opportunity, Simon, that -- where there was an additional $386 million that was allocated out. We work for all the customers that received that money. In Windstream's case, it was a significant amount of money, about $124 million, $125 million. CenturyLink took WitMatch [ph] about $100 million. And I think we have customer commentary about that money coming into the business. I think what was more encouraging were estimates that I saw produced by one Street analyst about the potential impacts of the expanded Connect America Fund, where they expect kind of $1.7 billion or so in annual support for CapEx from 2014 through '18. And, apparently, this analyst did review kind of preliminary FCC models, which resulted in a number of our customers receiving hundreds of millions of dollars a year for CapEx and those parts of their network, where, historically, they've not spent much money. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: And what would be the timing of the incremental funds, because you had mentioned the roll off in your October guidance. When did the newer funds come into the business?

I would expect, Simon, that, that's kind of a first calendar quarter '14. There may be some immediate spending. But once again, I think you have to look at the $386 million awards within the context of a settled outlook for '14 to '18, because they're going to want to integrate the planning between these initial awards and what they expect to see on a sustained basis. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Great. And then on the wireless commentary, it sounds like it was very similar to the prior quarters' revenue level, yet we see some of the big wireless operators spending more with you. So just wanted to maybe get a little bit better understanding, at least, qualitatively, how you see the growth rate of the Wireless business, understanding you don't want to guide specifically, but help us understand why the July quarter was, basically, similar to the April quarter.

Yes, I think there's a seasonality to the business that we're learning about. And it really -- it really hinges on the releases by the carriers, primarily, AT&T, as that's our largest wireless customer. And there's just a flow to that business that it looks -- and we're still learning that kind of the fourth calendar quarter -- first calendar quarter of next year is when the construction hits, because we do everything from site acquisition and zoning through construction that the -- as the releases are issued, the big spending is always on the back end, when you do the construction. Simon M. Leopold - Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division: Great. And then just one last clarification, please. Slide 11, you talked about your other income guidance for the next quarter. And then it says declines to $0.8 million to $1.3 million quarterly thereafter. I'm assuming you still expect your April quarter to be a strong quarter for other income as it has been seasonally or...

I mean, I think, Simon, that's going to be a function of the growth opportunity that we see in our business. We continue to integrate our fleets as a result of the Quanta acquisition. And the thing to keep in mind is that we tend to cycle equipment out of the fleet at the fifth or sixth year. If you can recall, in the spring of 2009, not a lot of people were spending money on equipment, right, and so there'll be less of that vintage to rotate out of the fleet. The asset acquisitions we did in 2009 were pretty modest, which means the disposals will be fairly modest in calendar 2014.

Our next question comes from the line of Noelle Dilts with Stifel. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: First, on the wireless business. I was just wondering if there's any way you could break out how much of that $50 million came from AT&T versus other customers?

We don't have that. It's the predominant customer. It's a substantial portion. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then integration expenses with the Quanta operation. They were about $1.1 million in the quarter. Can you tell us what you're expecting for the first quarter?

I think we are at that run rate or probably better. I mean, we got some activities that we need to get done by the end of the calendar year, so we actually see that picking up over the next 2 quarters. Noelle C. Dilts - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc., Research Division: Okay. And then just going back to an earlier question you had on capital allocation and acquisitions. You talked about a strong acquisition pipeline. But can you talk about where this -- where buyback ranks among your kind of capital allocation priorities?

I mean, Noelle, what we've always said, and it's within the context of what we see for opportunity. There was a research piece that came out at one of our cable customers today that hinted that they're considering going to 1-gigabit speeds for some of their network. And so the first thing we're always going to do is support organic growth. And then with respect to acquisitions versus buybacks, we're going to look at it on a relative value basis. We're going to make sure that where will we deploy the capital, we think we have the highest return.

And our next question comes from the line of Alan Mitrani with Sylvan Lake.

I'll just follow-up on Noelle's. On the $1.1 million of integration cost that you had this quarter that you didn't call out, is that all in the SG&A line?

Yes.

Okay, so that equates to close to $0.02 a share, right, Drew?

Approximately, yes.

Okay. And your guidance then for first quarter, where you talked about G&A expense, up slightly from Q1, that also includes, as you said, maybe $1.5 million or so in SG&A?

Yes, it could be that or a little bit higher, Alan, just based on what we have to get up.

Okay, so your guidance of $0.42 to $0.49 includes a few pennies of cost....

Wait, wait, wait. We're not -- the only number we backed out this quarter was the acquisition-related expenses of the Sage and the wireless construction business.

Okay. And when do you think these are going to be finished? Is this -- is that this coming quarter, the first quarter? Or you think it'll trickle into January as well?

We've targeted end of the calendar year.

So the first 2 quarters of fiscal '14.

Exactly.

Is there any reason why you're not -- when your -- I'm looking at your slide, this is EPS diluted, non-GAAP, why you don't break these out? These seem to be maybe non-GAAP charges.

Yes. I mean, Alan, I mean, it's a judgment call, some people do, some people don't. We're providing the numbers, so people can evaluate the equity in the way that they're comfortable with. In our case, when we did such a significant acquisition, we knew we were going to have these expenses, and so we've called them out, but we haven't represented the financials, so that we have to do Reg Gs for the another 4 quarters after we're done.

Okay. On the Quanta business, just a follow-up on what Adam asked, is the business still about 400 gross margin basis points below your legacy businesses?

It's seasonally closer in the summer and wider in the winter, just because there's different seasonality.

Okay. And on the backlog, this is normally a quarter, where backlog declines as you burn a lot. How much of this backlog -- maybe just break it down of the $2.2 billion, how much of that was acquired backlog through Sage and the other business?

Very limited. That's an organic number, essentially.

So in essence, you built backlog sequentially, even though -- maybe by almost 10%, even though you burned off, I assume, a decent amount of business plus the CenturyTel business. You're still only booking a few months of that business left half a year. Is that business done?

I don't know if you follow the contracts we disclose, we renewed a portion of CenturyLink that's West -- essentially, the legacy Quest business, so that came into the business. But I think the other thing to keep in mind is that as we experienced organic growth and our run rates increase on a trailing 12 basis, then that also impacts backlog, too.

Got it. Okay, that's helpful. And on the utility line -- on the underground utility line locating business, it's still really flat to down, I would say, in this quarter, if you take out, I assume, what's acquired business that Quanta had a tiny piece of that underground utility line locating business. Last quarter, you said that you're -- you'd survey all your subsidiaries, and they thought that business was going to pick up in terms of housing was picking up. It doesn't seem like it's yet coming into your business. Do you think you’re a lag? Or does that happen in calendar 2014? When do we finally see that business grow?

At this point, Alan, it continues to be an area, as we talked about a couple of years ago, that we'd deemphasize. And so we're seeing some growth, but we're also continuing to prune the portfolio. And it's not the primary focus of the business right now.

Okay. And then Drew, for you, on the DSOs, you acquired Sage, did that impact your DSOs at all this quarter?

Not really, Alan. It was a relatively small acquisition, so no effect there.

Okay. Normally, I see your DSOs in the fiscal fourth quarter rise by a few days when times and business is good and revenues are growing, sequentially. This quarter, it sort of stayed flat to down. Can you just -- is that because you're making progress on Quanta's business? Just talk a bit about that, and what we can expect to see then going into the winter, because it seems like you still have maybe 10 days or more of excess DSOs versus historical.

Yes. We continue, Alan, to be working on those acquired businesses as well as around the stimulus work tended to have retention -- contract retention. And so as those projects complete, they're actually pretty additive to cash flow as that retention reverses. We continue to experience some positive mix in the business, depending on where the growth is. And so that's helpful, too, but we do see strong cash flows, as we have always seen in the -- in our second quarter, as that working capital reverses seasonally.

Okay. I mean, it seems like you're going to have an -- sort of an extra tick, given how much higher DSOs are versus historically.

We'll work hard to generate as much cash as we can, because we think we have good opportunities to spend it on.

Okay. And then you thought when you bought Quanta, you would do $400 million to $450 million on a calendar year basis. It seems like they're exceeding that meaningfully. What's your new expectation?

We haven't -- we still want to think about the business that way, because there's still a greater component of that business even in the fourth quarter that's stimulus related. And they have a number of opportunities as we do in the other businesses for growth going into calendar '14. But we see no need to kind of readjust that kind of run rate expectation, when we know that the stimulus is coming out of the business.

Okay. And then, lastly, on organic growth, you have done a good job, but it seems like, if I remember, I think you have -- your easiest comp in the first quarter, I guess, for the legacy business. There was no storm work, and you did last year 2.4% organic growth level. Why is it that you're guiding a legacy business...

The peak stimulus quarter was Q1 of '13. And so it has the most significant roll off. Once we get through that quarter, the roll offs are smaller.

Can you quantify for us what percent of revenue, or maybe just give us a sense for the quarter or something like that your stimulus is?

We would have had slightly double-digit organic growth in the fourth quarter, absent the headwind.

And currently, there are no further questions.

Okay. Well, we thank everybody for your time and attention. We look forward to speaking to you on our first quarter earnings call the week of Thanksgiving. Thank you.