Good day, everyone, and welcome to the CSC Fiscal Year 2011 Fourth Quarter Earnings Conference. Today's call is being recorded. Now for opening remarks and introductions, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Bryan Brady, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to CSC's earnings call for the fourth quarter of our fiscal year 2011. We issued our preliminary financial results earlier this afternoon. So hopefully, you've had an opportunity to review them. With me today are Mike Laphen, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; and Mike Mancuso, our Chief Financial Officer. As usual, this call is being webcast at csc.com, and we've also posted slides to our website to accompany our discussion. So moving to Slide 2, you'll see our reminder that statements made during this call that are not historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially. Additional information concerning these risks and uncertainties is contained in the company's filings with the SEC. Copies of these filings are available from the SEC, from our website and from our Investor Relations department. On Slide 3, you'll see our acknowledgment that CSC's presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. So in accordance with SEC rules, a reconciliation of these metrics to GAAP metrics is included in the tables of the earnings release and in the appendix to our slides. Both documents are available for your review at the Investor Relations section of the CSC website. Please refer to Slide 4 for a statement on the ongoing investigation related to the Nordics, and Mike will comment further on this. Finally, I'd like to remind our listeners that CSC assumes no obligation to update the information presented on this conference call except, of course, as required by law. Now if you'll kindly move on to Slide #6, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Mike Laphen.

Thank you, Bryan. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for joining us today. As I'm sure you've seen in our earnings release, we are presenting preliminary unaudited financial results today, with the expected completion of our audit and filing of our 10-K by no later than June 15. This delay is necessary to allow our audit committee to accomplish some additional investigative work related to our previously disclosed accounting irregularities in our MSS Nordics Region and to allow our auditors to then finalize the audit. We have filed a Form 12b-25 with the SEC today confirming that we expect to file our 10-K by no later than June 15. Although fiscal year '11 was challenging given the NHS uncertainty, the unexpected difficulties in the Nordics, and the delays in the federal budgets, we are pleased with the positive revenue growth in our Commercial business both sequentially and year-over-year. Importantly, excluding these challenges, our underlying business is where we said it would be in terms of operating margin and free cash flow. Additionally, we significantly strengthened our balance sheet by paying down debt, initiated the payment of a dividend, defined and activated an open market stock buyback program and secured a new backstop credit facility. We also continued to implement our strategy with positive results that signaled we're on the right path for future success. Our acquisitions have been focused on our high-growth segments in cybersecurity, acquiring important intellectual property for our healthcare vertical, and expanding in Brazil, a key geography. With respect to new business, our fiscal year '11 bookings totaled $14 billion. As we indicated at our recent investor's conference, circumstances did not accommodate the timeframe we and our clients had envisioned for some $2 billion of additional awards. Of this amount, we are pursuing approximately $1.7…

Thanks, Mike, and good afternoon. Let's get right to the numbers. I'll begin with Chart 8, which at a high level attempts to walk you from our February 9 guidance through the significant changes that led to our May 2 revised guidance, and to our preliminary FY '11 results. When we issued the February guidance, we did not contemplate the discontinued operations accounting treatment of the gains on the sale of the 2 businesses, one sale that had occurred in our first half and the second that was anticipated in our fourth quarter. The gains were large enough to classify as discontinued operations. For the purposes of this chart, the guidance includes the disco ops revenue, margin and EPS. The preliminary results revenue excludes disco ops. As noted on the chart, the preliminary EPS results includes the disco ops gains, which were assumed in our February guidance. We were also very clear in February that our guidance did not include any impact from the NHS MOU negotiations. Other than the NHS impact, the other single most significant change from our February guidance is a 100-plus basis point increase in our tax rate which accounts for most of the $0.11 in the middle column on the chart. There are a myriad of other plus and minuses in that $0.11, including a Nordics-related prior period adjustment of approximately $0.04. With regard to NHS, we will not get into the details of the MOU-related changes, but I do want to clarify some confusion around surrounding the $0.34 EPS adjustment. It represents an inception to date margin adjustment on the previously recognized revenue. In other words, the anticipated overall estimated margin on the program at completion is now lower than what we had historically booked. But to remind you, the assumed margin rate is…

Thank you, Mike. We'll now hold a Q&A session, ladies and gentlemen. So operator, would you please advise everyone of the process and announce our first caller, please?

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from David Grossman of Stifel, Nicolaus. David Grossman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: There's obviously been a lot of noise in the press recently about the NHS contract. Can you help us understand whether the assumptions that you're making in your fiscal '12 guidance are more or less consistent with what we're reading now? Or should we kind of think about this as a continued work in process where there could be fairly substantial adjustments either up or down to what you're assuming in your guidance?

David, our guidance assumes the terms that we have negotiated on the pending MOU. So whatever adjustments would come along with the signing of that MOU have already been incorporated in our fourth quarter and fiscal year '11 results. So given the signing of the MOU as it stands today, there would be no further adjustments. David Grossman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And when was that signed, Mike?

No, it's not signed yet. I'm just saying when it would be signed. So we're awaiting the final approval process to go through. There is a review underway as we speak, and we would expect that, that will be finalized in the June timeframe. But of course, the government runs its own timetable so I can't guarantee that, David. But that's what our expectation would be is around the June timeframe. David Grossman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: I see. And then, in terms of getting back to the guidance, and maybe this is for you Mike Mancuso, I'm having a little trouble backing into the EPS number. Just using even the low end of the revenue and margin guidance, I'm getting numbers substantially higher. Is there something in there that perhaps I'm missing that may get you to the $4.70 to $4.80. I'm actually getting a substantially higher number.

Well, David, you pick your revenue number and you pick your OI number in the range that we're talking about. And if you assume reasonable behavior in the below-the-line items of corporate G&A, interest expense and the like, you assume no additional gains from divested businesses in the numbers, and you apply a 32% tax rate, I think you should zero right in on that $4.70 or $4.80 kind of number. The tax rate alone is worth about $0.40 to $0.50 year-over-year. So if we apply the FY '11 tax rate to FY '12, you could add $0.50 to that EPS and get yourself up around $5.25, $5.30 real quick. So that's the best I can tell you on that. David, the story on FY '11 is really not EPS, and this is not an attempt to divert your attention away from it. The story on FY '12, and I mean FY '12, is about revenue. If we achieve the revenue growth we're expecting, the EPS numbers are going to be significantly perturbated by whatever happens with the iSOFT acquisition, assuming it closes and when it closes. We'll be converting IFRS to GAAP. There'll be significant adjustments in the accounting which will affect EPS, including spending integration costs. So not to divert you away from the EPS number, but if you want to think about us, think about the revenue, whether it's achievable, et cetera, et cetera. The rest of it will fall to the bottom line as it does. And yes, the tax rate can move around, kind of thing. But for now, that $4.70 to $4.80 is in the proper ballpark given the revenue ranges and margin ranges we're giving you. David Grossman - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: I see. Just one last question then. Looking at the verbiage about what's going on in the Nordics and the SEC verbiage or the verbiage around the investigation of what you're doing internally, how much of that is incremental, vis-à-vis what we talked about I guess when this came out several weeks ago? And then secondly, at least from your internal investigations, is that pretty much complete now and are you waiting for the SEC? Or are you still internally in the process of getting your arms around any potential incremental exposure?

David, as best we know at the moment from our own activities, notwithstanding investigations going on, any accounting adjustments out of the Nordics have already been reflected in the numbers you're looking at including, as I said earlier, a $0.04 adjustment in the fourth quarter itself. The investigation, we can't comment obviously on the details of it, the progress of it, the length of it. It's not in our control. We're obviously cooperating. But the accounting reflects the best that we know at this point in time.

Our next question will come from Nathan Rozof with Morgan Stanley.

Just to touch a little bit more on that MSS issue. Mike Mancuso, I know you were real proactive at looking beyond the Nordic region to make sure there weren't any similar problems elsewhere. I just wanted to confirm from you whether or not the SEC or the board's independent review has also expanded beyond the Nordic region as well.

Nathan, frankly, I'm not in a position to be able to comment on the investigation.

Okay, that's fair. And then just on the Federal business and the discontinued ops, can you give us a sense for what the revenue growth rate -- I assume that's not reflected in the fourth quarter. What it would have been if those business units hadn't gone to disco ops and what the underlying growth rate would have been in F '12 in that business without the impact of that as well?

Well, the revenue impact of the divested business is in FY '11, and it’s, hopefully to help you answer your question, would have been about $100 million. So we're going into FY '12 without that $100 million of divested revenue. Now on the other hand, we have made some modest acquisitions in the Federal business in FY '11 that will create revenue in FY '12 and for the most part, offset, if you will, the revenues that evaporated with divestitures. So it's really not about acquisition impact in the Federal business. It's all about what happens with the budget, and the clarity in the budget, and when that clarity is introduced, be it in the early fall or we drift to continuing resolutions, et cetera, et cetera. So the best I can tell you on that one.

Okay, that's fair. And then just last question for me, on the iSOFT acquisition, I realize that F ’12 doesn't include that given that it isn't closed yet. But it makes sense from a strategic rationale in terms of why you'd move into that business in the healthcare space. But given that it's a relatively small business in terms of revs, but is loss making under its current corporate structure, can you help us think about what the parameters might be in terms of the dilutive impact for CSC in F '12 assuming you close at kind of midyear?

I can't tell you exactly that number. That's why we haven't effected it into our guidance, Nathan. On the revenue comment you made, roughly, on a full year basis, iSOFT generates $300 million to $400 million of revenue, their numbers, their historical and forecasted performance kind of thing. So again, not insignificant. Obviously, we'll convert the accounting from IFRS to GAAP. That'll affect revenue. When we close it will affect revenue and so on. Integration costs and the accounting will affect the dilution. But again, there's too many moving parts to try to pin a number around it. It is a strategic acquisition, and you really need to think about iSOFT in terms of FY '13. If it closes at a reasonable time within FY '12, we'll be through the integration activities and the rationalization activities, and the real impact of it will be felt FY '13 and beyond.

So it will be accretive in FY '13?

Yes.

We'll hear next from Bryan Keane from Crédit Suisse. Bryan Keane - Crédit Suisse AG: I just wanted to get a breakout of the discontinued ops. Is there a way to break it out just say, different pieces there for the $0.22?

I'm sorry, could you repeat that again? Bryan Keane - Crédit Suisse AG: The discontinued operations, I think it totals $0.22. I just wanted to get -- is that a bunch of different pieces? I know there's a federal piece in there. I just want to...

No, it's the 2 businesses and the sales of which we announced earlier, Bryan. It's all in the federal space, those 2 businesses. As I said, it was about $100 million worth of FY '11 revenue. The gains, top of my head, were approximately $40 million, $50 million-plus on the divested businesses that's not tax affected. So apply the tax rate to it and divide by 157 or 158 million shares and you got your number.

I would just add that we're not aware of any other OCI possibilities in our contract base. And when you look at a $100 million all in all against the $16 billion base and approximately $6 billion base in our Federal business, that was a pretty minor impact of the OCI relative to what we're seeing some of our peers experience. So we think that's all behind us now. And at least at this point, don't expect any additional impacts. Bryan Keane - Crédit Suisse AG: That's helpful. And then Mike Mancuso, just on the first quarter EPS of $0.65 to $0.70. That's quite a bit lower than I think -- than consensus. Is there some one-timers in there that drops that number in particular? I mean I assume it's going to be margins will be down significantly year-over-year in Q1?

Well any rightsizing or workforce adjustments that take place across the business take place primarily in the first quarter so that we see the yield in the year. So that's been a factor. Obviously, historically, our first quarter is always the lowest quarter in the year, another factor. The Nordics business, to remind you, its run rate is quite low at the point. As a matter of fact, there's a strike going on right now in the Nordics business that will be affecting income generation in the first quarter. So lots of -- a handful of items in the first quarter, Bryan. No one significant jumping out at you kind of thing. Bryan Keane - Crédit Suisse AG: Is there any lower margin expected that's putting extra pressure on Q1 from the NHS contract?

No...

No, NHS is budgeted at the revised MOU rates. So no, that's not impacting it. I would just amplify a little bit on Mike's remarks that we're being a bit more aggressive this fiscal year in terms of our rightsizing than we were last year. That all neutralizes itself throughout the year as we recover the savings. And we have a couple of startup programs as well that we're investing in, in the first quarter. So I guess you could look at that as more of a one-off than anything else. So it’s a little bit impacted by that as well. But other than that, it's a typically normal Q1, just a little bit more aggressive than some of the rightsizing. Bryan Keane - Crédit Suisse AG: Okay, and then just last question for me, the revenue guidance, it's still showing pretty considerable growth rate. Did you guys consider at all maybe starting with more conservative level and then waiting for maybe the business to come in? Just want to get your thoughts on the revenue guidance.

We were worried about your first quarter EPS number and margin rates. So Bryan, we've been criticized for being too aggressive. We could be criticized for being too conservative. I think Mike elaborated at the Investors Conference that we were adopting a reasonable growth pattern in the Commercial business, which is supported by what we're seeing right now in the Commercial businesses and a rather conservative approach to the Federal Government business with fundamentally a 0% to 3% kind of growth number in the Federal business. So I think on balance, it's about the right number based on what we know and what we're seeing right now. It assumes continued recovery on the Commercial side. And it assumes a rather very gradual recovery on the Federal side.

Again, I would just add that Q4, our Commercial business, excluding NHS, was up a bit over 5%. And that's coming off of a comparable number in the -- well, full year is 4%, so obviously trending up. And we would expect something similar to that in Q1 right now for a go-forward basis. And as Mike said, we're probably flat to slightly negative or slightly positive on the Federal business. I think that's still a wait-and-see a bit.

[Operator Instructions] We'll hear our next question from Darrin Peller with Barclays Capital.

Just first on the Nordics adjustment taken again this quarter, can you just comment on what it actually related to this time? And just given it's been ongoing for a few quarters now, what really gives you confidence that it's completed now?

Intensive oversight, Darrin. In a nutshell. And we've obviously been all over the Nordics from the time the situation surfaced. We're continuing over it. We pore over everything. You put enough people to work on everything, the potential is you could find some things you may have missed earlier. There was an overcapitalization issue on a piece of equipment. The numbers were wrong and we reflected the proper level of depreciation in capitalization. There are literally thousands of assets that have been capitalized across the businesses. So just to try and give you an order of magnitude in terms of the work that's ongoing. We're confident that we found it all, but we could be proven wrong.

On the Commercial segments, just a little more color on the growth. I mean you still seem to be expecting some acceleration in the Commercial segments beyond this quarter. Can you just give us a little idea as to what's really driving that?

Yes, I would say on the Commercial side, our Business Solutions and Services side, we're expecting some good growth numbers on that side of the business. And we also -- if we complete the MOU in a timely way with the NHS government, we would also expect an uptick in revenue on the NHS contract as well. So I would say that's the primary area. I think the MSS business will be essentially in the low-single digits. So as we have planned and as our strategic direction is taking us, we see BSS as our growth engine, and that's proving out to be correct.

Okay. Just one last question on the outlook, when you think about the guidance you're giving at $16.5 million to $17 million on revenues. What would you say, on a percentage basis, is something that you actually have visibility into right now in the sense of deals that have been locked in, are ready to go?

$16.5 billion to $17 billion. Darrin, that's based on our backlog. It's based on what's in negotiation now. It's based on presumed signings and win ratios and budgets and end-of-year revenue and so on. So it's a combination of our visibility.

And then have you completed anything on the share buyback initiative?

Only what's been reported in the press release. It's an open market purchase. So we're obviously covered by blackout periods and other privileged information which precludes us from being able to be in the market.

We'll move on to our next caller, which comes from Rod Bourgeois in Bernstein. Rod Bourgeois - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc.: Can you just give us an update on your latest unbilled receivables balance and your latest balance of outsourcing contract costs as well?

No, we can't, Rod. We don't have that kind of detail in front of us here. Happy to provide it to you off-line. Rod Bourgeois - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co., Inc.: Okay. And then just in terms of the -- in light of the Nordic Region accounting irregularity, have you conducted any extensive effort to scrub the accounting and margins on key contracts in other parts of the business just to make sure that some of those similar issues like overcapitalization aren't occurring elsewhere in the company?

Of course we have. But I'm not going to comment on the details of the investigation or our efforts.

Operator, I think that concludes the Q&A session. And Mike, would you like to summarize it?

Well, thank you for joining us. As you might expect, we look forward to filing our 10-K not later than June 15 and put fiscal year '11 behind us. We're excited about fiscal year '12. We think we have great opportunity, we think we have great market position. And as we've said during this call, we think our core business is performing well. And we expect it to continue to perform well and our strategic direction is proving out to be the right direction for us to have top line success. So thank you very much for joining us.

Thank you.

And once again, everyone, this does conclude today's conference call. We thank you all for your participation.