Greetings, and welcome to the DoubleVerify Third Quarter 2022 Financial Results Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Tejal Engman, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Good afternoon and welcome to DoubleVerify’s third quarter 2022 earnings conference call. With us today are Mark Zagorski, CEO, and Nicola Allais, CFO. Today’s press release and this call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties and changes, and reflect our current expectations and information currently available to us, and our actual results could differ materially. For more information, please refer to the risk factors in our recent SEC filings, including our form 10-Q and our annual report on Form 10-K. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures, and should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, our GAAP results. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures are available in today’s earnings press release, which is available on our investor relations website at ir.doubleverify.com. Also, during the call today, we'll be referring to the slide deck posted on our website. With that, I'll turn it over to Mark.

Thanks, Tejal. And thanks everyone for joining us this evening. We delivered another record quarter with revenue growth of 35% above the top-end of the raised guidance we provided in August, and a testament to strength and resiliency of our business. Once again, all three of our revenue lines delivered double-digit growth. We created greater value for our existing clients by upselling products and growing product usage across platforms and geographies, and also won a large roster of new clients who have steadily ramped up usage of DV’s solutions over the last twelve months. We are raising our full year guidance to reflect 36% revenue growth and 31% adjusted EBITDA margins at the midpoint. In a year that has become increasingly challenging for global advertisers, DV continues to deliver strong growth plus substantial profitability, a rare combination in today's tumultuous public markets. The drivers that helped us grow in the third quarter and throughout 2022 are also catalysts for our future momentum. I will discuss these within the context of DoubleVerify’s three key differentiators, our rapidly-growing scale, our focus on market-defining innovation, and the deep level of trust we have built with our customers as an unbiased and independent partner. Beginning with scale, we are laser-focused on winning new clients and gaining market share. We won a greater number of new deals in the third quarter than we did in the entire first half of this year despite increasing macroeconomic headwinds. Our unique value proposition versus our competitive set has resulted in an 80% plus win rate across all opportunities over the 12 months ending September 30th. In the third quarter, we won Mattel, GAP and several other large and high-profile advertisers away from our competitors. In addition, we successfully broke through a number of greenfield accounts, TUI, Marina Bay…

Thank you, Mark and good afternoon, everyone. We are pleased to have delivered another strong third quarter and year-to-date revenue growth of 35% and 40% respectively with adjusted EBITDA margins of approximately 30%. The durability of our revenue growth and profitability reinforces the resilience of DV’s business model and the essential role DV solutions play for its customers, even in a challenging macro and geopolitical environment. While we remain mindful of the possibility of further reductions in ad spend that could impact our performance, we are raising the midpoint of our full-year revenue guidance range by the magnitude of our third quarter outperformance. This is based on our current visibility into the fourth quarter, and an expectation of the typical seasonal upswing in our activation business into year-end. Third quarter total revenue growth of 35% was driven by 48% growth in activation, 14% growth in measurement and 57% growth in supply side. Our activation and measurement business is derived from advertisers and drives a combined 90% of total revenue. Advertiser revenue grew 33% in the third quarter, with volumes or MTMs growing 17% and pricing or MTF growing 10% on a year-over-year basis, excluding revenue contribution from OpenSlate, which continues to perform in-line with expectations of $15 million to $18 million of revenue for full year 2022. On volumes, our 17% year-over-year growth continues to significantly outpace the industry as reflected in Magna’s forecast of 7% growth in 2022 US Digital Ad Spend, ex-Search. With regards to pricing, our MTF growth of 10% in the quarter was primarily driven by improved premium product mix, followed by the impact of the programmatic display and video price bifurcation which we initiated on our core programmatic products in the first quarter of this year. Our fixed transaction fee model is not a take-rate…

Yeah. Thank you, guys so much. And congratulations on the quarter, especially in this environment. Mark, I think the first thing I want to kind of tough on here was that 71% of wins were greenfield. And then following that, we've seen more deals in Q3 than the first half of the year combined. It feels like just kind of intuitively, this would be a challenging environment for finding new customers, especially ones that don't have a previous solution, when you're kind of maybe doing a little bit of evangelizing. Can you talk us through what's working so well, especially in this macro for landing new customers in those greenfields?

Yeah. Thanks for the question, Matt. It is truly part of what we've been focusing on over the last 12 months with regard to investments. If you remember, kind of where we started our journey after IPOs, we had significantly underinvested in some of our sales and marketing resources over the previous years. And last year, we leaned in pretty hard into those resources, particularly outside of the U.S. And I think what we're seeing now is the payoff of the investment of that additional sales headcount and what they've been able to do with our products. We knew that if we can get our solutions in front of folks and seen by our RFP win rate that's been above 80% for the last trailing 12 months, we can win those deals. So I think it you know, a, it was part of the investment thesis that we had on sales and getting our product in front of the right people. More specifically, when you're talking about how we are making these sales in a challenging macro environment, I think it really is a testament to what our solution does for advertisers, which it helps them drive better ROI. And if you're a CMO and your budget just was cut by 20%, you now have much less money to deliver the same or better results. And because of that, concerns about ad fraud, concerns about ads that can't be viewed, concerns about ads that are delivered in an environment that's not going to sell anything for you because it's either the wrong geography or the wrong context, those concerns become that much more important to advertisers. So I think our sales motion has really been focused on our solutions that deliver media quality but also that drive real ROI. And I think that's the message we're delivering to market and the market is responding to, which is, every dollar I have to spend is that much more precious, and your solution helped me do so.

That's really helpful. And it kind of tails into my next question for Nicola. Where you know, based on everything Mark just said, we can all feel that your model is very resilient in this macro, but nobody is immune. So, can you talk a little more color around the macro assumptions in Q4? And then maybe just kind of what gives you confidence around seeing that typical upswing in activation to end the year?

Yeah. Sure, Matt. So what I would say is we have been planning for a year-on-year slowdown since the beginning of the year, and it's been reflected in sort of the patterns that we've guided to. We haven't seen material signs of changes in that trajectory, but we did create a range on the Q4 guide which kind of reflects the sensitivity factors that you mentioned, particularly around what might happen on activation for the end of the year, which generally does show an uplift. So the guide range is sort of where we feel we might have some sensitivity around that. And just to dig a little bit deeper on that, the advertisers are getting more concerned about spend. That's where you're going to see some of the shift of money toward activation. And so that's really the part that remains sensitive for the fourth quarter. Measurement, we have significant visibility into the quarter already. So really, the sensitivity is just around activation.

Got it. Appreciate the color.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Andrew Boone with JMP Securities. Please proceed.

Hi, guys. Thanks so much for taking my questions. To start, it sounds like Authentic Attention is moving toward a more real inflection point for monetization. Mark, how should we think about sizing that opportunity as we head into 2023? Can you help us understand the contribution to MTF or anything else that we should think about as we think about just sizing how big that could be? And then secondly, OpEx has been very disciplined. Just going back 1Q, 2Q, 3Q, you guys have kind of nudged up by about $1 million a quarter here. Can you just talk about 2023 as you're now going through likely the business planning cycle for next year? How should we be thinking about expenses just given the lack of visibility overall within macro? Thanks so much

All right. I'll start off and then give you to take that question on OpEx, Nicola. Regarding Authentic Attention, I think we have been really pleased with the launch of the Authentic Attention Snapshot. As we noted, it is now being engaged with over 600 of our clients, which is exactly what we wanted. Because as we talked about this earlier this year, as we look at building an entirely metric, which is attention, we have to have both industry acceptance and standardization, which is fast occurring at multiple levels, but also better understanding on the brand and client level. And the launch of the snapshot, which is a freemium version of our tool, is doing exactly that. It's getting attention metrics in front of our key clients, getting them to engage with them, and getting them interested in actually employing them to better optimize their campaigns. To date, we now are looking at almost a third of those 600 who are interested in pursuing further deals. But with regard to the scale of the business next year, still early days, we're still looking at building out those business metrics. It is a premium-priced product. So I think the implementation of the product over the first several quarters of next year is going to be when we start seeing the real scaling, and we'll be able to provide a bit more color on what we think the impact will be for the year. So sorry for not a specific number here because at the end of the day, we're still building out the solution. It's still a minor contributor to our revenue, and we think it will probably be so moving into next year. But at the end of the day, as we're looking at scaling and sweeping, marketwise, this can be easily as big as viewability because it's a metric that really connects engagement plus exposure and those two things are essential to driving outcomes for advertisers. So early days, we've got work to do on kind of converting those testers and to pay customers, but the motion is in play, and I think we've seen some clearer results.

Yeah. On the question of '23 expenses, your question was specifically around in a challenging environment, what would we do on expenses? What I would start by saying is we do have a very profitable model, as you know, and we've been able to maintain 30-plus margins throughout. If the growth is reduced, right, if we are in a challenging macro, we would look to maintain a decent level of EBITDA. If growth slowed, I think we'll just struggle expenses until the conditions improve. But we don't want to necessarily decide the fact that the TAM is very large, and so there are opportunities to invest opportunistically. We would do that, but we will keep an eye on the expenses, the growth really does slow down. I would also say, in a tougher macro environment, in fact, we have a lot of cash on the balance sheet that creates an opportunity for us to invest in different ways, which is another thing that we could look at.

Thank you. Operator Our next question comes from Laura Martin with Needham & Company. Please proceed.

Hi, there, guys. Excellent numbers, raising guidance, stocks up 10% aftermarket, really excellent numbers. I have two questions. The first is let's follow up on Andrew's question about - and I'm going to ask it the other direction, which is, I get that you want to maintain margins, expenses are important to you. However, Twitter just - thanks to Elon Musk, laid off half of their workforce. Facebook is laying off people. Alphabet is laying off people. It feels like there's going to be a lot of really talented technical people coming available, and I'm wondering how you think through, since your numbers continue to hold up so nicely, grabbing some of this talent that's now going to be out over the next 6 months, especially if we go into recession. Can you talk through how opportunistic you're going to be as talent comes available in the marketplace from very high-quality places as they try to throttle their cost growth, basically, at Wall Street and systems actually? And then my second question is, Mark, 57% growth in supply side, what the heck is this? It is now over 10% of your revenue. It's growing the fastest. Could you tell us who's selling the supply side? Or are they just coming in over the transom, and you guys don't have to do anything. How is this growing? How is this tiny piece of your business growing so fast? And is it going to end up being a third of your business? Or are you - I'm shocked at the growth in the supply side. I didn't even know we focused on that in this company. So let's talk about those two subjects, please.

All right. Good questions, Laura. I'll start off a lot of the people one and then maybe Nicola can add a little more of a technical take on it. But people are our most expensive asset, right? And when we talk about OpEx and investments, it's really what we're talking about is people. And as you noted, the market for those people over the last trailing several quarters, has been incredibly intense, right? The hiring coming out of the pandemic was feverish. The cost of those resources was incredibly high, and we were competing against everybody for great resources. Now I think that the market has loosened up. There are great people coming into market. And for us, that means an opportunity and an opportunity for us to continue to upgrade our team, an opportunity for us to fill spots with great people and do so at a cost that hopefully significantly less than it was a year ago. So we continue to focus on margins. We continue to focus on running a sound and a well-run business that generates growth and profitability. But we're going to look for opportunities to get great people. We're going to look for spending against growth as it makes sense. But one of the nice things right now is that spending has just gotten a little bit cheaper for us. So we're - as there's inflation all over the place, I think people costs on a per head basis are going to start to look a little bit better for us. Nicola, do you want to add anything to add?

Yeah. No, I agree with what Mark said. For us, it really just gets easier to find talent. It has been hard. At the beginning of the year it was difficult to find talent. So I think this just creates an easier pool for us to find the talent that we need. And I would say, if - we will remain opportunistic if there's an opportunity for us to invest faster because we think the opportunity is there, but we might do it. We will be very mindful of our margins. But point up or down, obviously, we would do it for the right level of investment.

For sure.

And look, I have to give our teams some kudos here. We have an incredibly talented team that's doing great work in a challenging macro environment. So we already have great assets, adding more is going to be the best thing to do. On your second question on the supply side, I think this is a nice piece of our business. I know it's still relatively small as a revenue generator. But a lot of this has to do with us working with platforms to leverage our data to give them, for example, a minimal level of brand safety floor on the inventory that they're offering out, providing them with internal fraud verification tool set. So it's basically taking our core data sets and just leveraging them on the supply side, on SSPs, on publisher sites, on retail media platform. So folks who basically are pushing inventory out but some wants to provide some level of transparency and cleanliness to that inventory. We see that grow at a nice steady pace. We've got a team that's focused on it. So -- they are, like the rest of our folks, performing really well. And as more and more platforms, particularly folks on the CTV and gaming space, deliver - start to become focused on being ad supported and talking the talk of advertisers, we think there's continued opportunities there as well. So it's a nice revenue growth for us. We don't talk about it a lot. That also includes our publisher business, which has a nice growth trajectory, but it is complementary to our advertiser business. We will continue to grow that business, and we have got a great a great team doing it.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Youssef Squali with Truist Securities. Please proceed.

Great. Thank you very much. Congrats, guys. You make it look pretty easy in a pretty challenging environment. So please keep it up. So my two questions are, first, I know you're not guiding to 2023 yet. But as you look forward at next year and you go through your budgeting process, what base case are you guys baking into your expectations? And maybe can you talk about the resiliency of the model, as you know. I think in your prepared remarks, you talked about your pricing model. But what else is there that gives you the confidence that your business is resilient, relatively resilient. And then can you just provide us an update on the Meta relationship and the integration of brand suitability solutions into the news feed? Thank you.

Maybe I'll start a little bit and then you can add some color. So let me start at the back, which is the easier one to talk about is - it's kind of like fight club, you can't talk about that. Yes, it's first rule. But they announced last month that initial testing had began for third-party verification solutions for the feed. And we've said publicly that we look forward to potentially working with them on expanding those solutions because we are - what they call a badged brand safety business partner. So we've been working and consulting with them as they continue to develop the solution and the plan is to offer it at some point next year. So still leaning in there and still excited about the opportunity and a great one for us and the company. On the - I'll talk a little bit about resiliency and maybe Nicola can talk about how we're looking at 2023. So I think we heard from earlier this year when we had our Investor Day, we talked about what drives resiliency for us. And everything from the fact that we've got solutions that are - we consider essential and then drive ROI for advertisers, right? They're needed - to the fact that we have a business model that's based predominantly on fixed fees that don't suffer like a percentage of media model does when CPMs of media go down. That, plus the fact that we still have a lot of greenfield to go after. I mean, 71% of our deals this quarter were greenfield. They weren't competitive takeaways that are new to DoubleVerify. So that plus new products coming out, all of those things give us a good level of comfort that, again, we never said we're immune to downturns in advertising, right. We've built a pretty resilient model in which no single sector, no single media property - if dollars shift from Social to OpenWeb, we're okay. And no single buying strategy is really going to impact us accurately. So all of those become factors as we look at next year, which I think is we're not the first one to say is still a question mark from an advertiser perspective and from a macroeconomic perspective. Yes. Go ahead.

What I would add is you think we make it look easy. It's obviously not easy. It's hard work from everybody here to make sure the products are superior to what else is in the market and that we - our go-to-market strategy is the right one. I would say, in addition to the pricing model, there is one aspect that this year makes us feel good about how we're continuing to enter macro disruption is that we are far outpacing the industry in terms of growth. So we do feel like we're still at a higher cliff than what the macro is showing in terms of digital ad spend. And I think going into '23, setting a size of pace of adoption into new areas, there are a lot of new areas that are going to come to play next year. Netflix is a known one. Take off is very new for us. There are other areas that make us feel good about the opportunities out there. I think the macro will impact the speed at which we get into those areas, but they're all there, right? So it might delay a little bit but we do feel like there's plenty of us to go after on the TAM side of things. So I think '22 was confirmatory that we're a little ahead of where the industry is at and that's where we're looking at to build our case.

Makes sense. Thank you, both.

Our next question comes from Arjun Bhatia with William Blair. Please proceed.

Thanks for taking my questions, guys. And congrats on the quarter. Maybe I wanted to pick up on that last point. Nicola, it seems like there's a lot of important partnerships and big opportunities that are going to come into play. Next year, you have Netflix, you have Meta and you have other opportunities that you can certainly go after. Can you talk a little bit about how the R&D org is faring from a capacity perspective as you're looking to build maybe the technical integrations into a lot of these newer opportunities? And how do you think about that from a hiring perspective, right, you need to add more engineers and maybe ramp up hiring there as you have more opportunities to go after?

Yes. I'll start on marketing trend. I think - I'll fall back on a few things that we've talked about in the past. We do have a unified pipeline for social product. And that becomes something that really allows us to go into new areas faster than just having to start from scratch, right? And then the deep knowledge we have in integration really help us to get into the next one. I think the partnerships that we have with the various platforms really helps us accelerate that first point, right, when we start talking to the platforms about what it means to integrate. And so we feel like we have a head start on all of that. Obviously, we will have to look at our resources if something very large comes to play, but we're also redeploying the resources that we have, right, after a while you're able to learn from what we've already built and kind of move in to the next integration. So we are balancing a little bit with just reapplying our staff into new areas using the lines that we already have, supplementing a little bit with outsourcing, obviously. But if a very large opportunity comes, as I said earlier, we'd be willing to look at additional investments. We wanted 2 points on margin. I think it's the right investment we would do it.

No -- which is basically, we've been able to build a very flexible and agile data ingestion system that allows us to move to different types of platforms, but provide the same level of data out and measurement out regardless of what kind of data comes in. So I think that's helped us. And when we started Social years ago, it was a different story. But every Social platform that we've added since has given us more knowledge, allows us to move quicker. And when we start moving into CTV, the work that we've done, for example, on Hulu, it forms the work that we do with Roku, which will inform the work that we do with Netflix, right? So I think it all builds on each other. And there are certainly checkout projects and platforms that will involve additional resources. But the good news is kind of just like fraud schemes that all kind of look almost the same, but they have different variants, platforms, in a lot of cases, look very similar. They just have different variants that we have to deal with. So it's not like reinventing the wheel each time we create a new integration.

Okay. Got it. Very helpful. And then Mark, maybe one for you, that -- when you think about a lot of these newer deals and newer opportunities that you're closing, especially the greenfield opportunities that are out there, where is brand safety like ranking in terms of priority from a customer advertiser perspective? Like, we've known it's been high, but it seems like it's still increasing off of a relatively high level. So when you're pitching ROI and value prop to customers, where is brand safety relative to a lot of the other forms of return that you offer with your solution?

It's a great question. And I think we've talked about the past how our sales motion has changed to lean much more into brand safety and brand suitability over the last several years just due to the macro environment that advertisers are dealing with, right? So it's kind of a no-brainer to want to filter out ads that people can't see because they're not viewable or ads that can potentially fraud. But what keeps advertisers -- those are money losers, right? You'll lose money, and it's not great and no advertiser wants to do so. But what keeps them up at night its brand safety and brand suitability. That becomes the nightmare of a CMO, which is my ad shows up next to hate speech or white supremacist content or something that's totally inappropriate for my brand. And I think that has become the resounding message that we've got out to market with, it's just we're going to help you sleep better at night. So -- our sales team uses brand safety and suitability as entry and a lot of discussion. You see that in the ABS growth that we have, which is, hey, besides even measuring and blocking, don't even buy it, right? So Authentic Brand Safety became Authentic Brand Suitability because we want to provide even a greater level of granularity in that kind of protection down to the suitability level. So it has changed. The dialogue has changed is now a big part of how we go to market. You can see it in our results, products like ABS are growing as fast as they are. And it's not a U.S. phenomenon anymore. It's a global phenomenon, brands are global. There are regional challenges to brand suitability and brand safety. And now as we operate all of our brand safety suitability tools around the globe, we see opportunities for them there as well. So it's been a -- it's been a really important shift in not only how we sell, but in where we invest in products and what our customers are really interested in buying from us.

Awesome. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Michael Graham with Canaccord. Please proceed.

Thank you. So one quick one on Twitter. Just -- I know you mentioned that you've just integrated for brand safety and stability. Any thoughts on like sort of the timing to that having an impact on the revenue? And is there any worry that with the changes there that might get disrupted at all? And then a bit of a broader question. Mark, is there a good way to think about like how much headroom you have with a typical large advertising client? You mentioned 20% of the top 500 are taking activation only. But is there a good way to think about sort of how much growth you have and how much visibility you have, I guess, within some of your big advertising customers just to expand wallet share with them?

Sure. Thanks for the question, Michael. And we are waiting for our first Twitter question, so surprised it took this long. So we're still in the beta process of getting that product out to market. We obviously are excited to -- and our advertisers are really excited about having a brand safety and suitability solution in that environment. Right now, Twitter is a relatively small portion of our social media revenue, and we haven't planned for that to grow significantly over the next couple of quarters and still seem to be a smaller social network, both from a scale from an advertiser wallet share and from our business. It's a great opportunity. We're likely going to see some delays in development and launch of that product just due to the chaos that we see at Twitter. But ultimately, as a financial impact to our business, it's very, very light. So good opportunity, good opportunity for advertisers. We think it's a good timing to get that product to market. We're still excited to get to general acceptance, but we're expecting some delays in that. On the second question, when we look at kind of our solution set and where we have more opportunity to grow. I think we've always start with kind of the number of products, the number of products that we have with our customers. So about 60% of our customers use less than 4 products, which means that we still got a decent amount of headroom to go out and sell our full suite to them, right? So we look at, for example, growth of ABS over the quarter. A lot of that growth is with current customers expanding that into new markets. When we look at the adoption of, for example, new platforms in our Social business, so new Social coverage we saw Social grow significantly over the quarter, and that's from current clients as well. So I think we still have a good amount of room. When we look at, I believe, on our ABS business for our top 500 customers, that number is still relatively low penetration. I think 63% in our top 500 are using it, but that's 63% using it in one market, could be. So lots of room there. As we've always said, we'll love adding new customers but we still got lots of growth with our current customers. And I think the product that we continue to expand means that, that 63% using four or less products means that there's probably - that number is going to be increasing over time.

Thank you, Mark.

Our next question comes from Vasily Karasyov with Cannonball Research. Please proceed.

My question was about political spending [Technical Difficulty] at all because looking at the transaction measure, there is no change versus Q2. So can you talk about your exposure? And then I have a follow-up on that?

Vasily, you broke up a little bit there. So maybe if you can...

Okay. I can repeat if it helps?

Yes, please. Please.

My question was about political spending in the space, whether it had an impact at all in the quarter? Or are you seeing it in Q4 because looking at your transaction measures, growth is the same as in Q2, right? So it doesn't seem by that metric that you are benefiting from that. So am I right? And then I have a quick follow-up on that.

Yeah, I think your read is right. And we've said it in the past, political spend doesn't really have a direct impact. Campaigns are not using our products the way a brand would because those are specific to a specific time for a specific purpose. We don't have a lot f direct impact from political campaigns.

Thank you. What some of your peers in the programmatic space say is that when political spenders are in the market, brands sometimes step aside because political campaigns are not price-sensitive. So -- is that something that you're seeing? So is it possible that there will be even an improvement in trends with brands after the political spending season is over?

Yes. I mean, we - yes, about - I mean, we're aware of that thought that maybe political kind of just puts the brand aside. We frankly - we haven't seen it to the point that it's directly tied to political. Like, in our trend, we haven't seen, even in prior campaign cycles, we haven't seen that necessarily.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Our next question comes from Mark Murphy with JPMorgan. Please proceed.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the question. This is Arti Vula on for Mark Murphy. Quick question. If you're looking at the retail segment of your customers, anything worth calling out there since you're kind of heading into the holiday season? Some of the companies expressed a little bit of caution but then they also have a lot of inventory they try to move. So that's generally a positive for advertising. Thanks.

Yes, that's exactly - that would be exactly the dynamic that we're looking at, which is it is a heavy season for retail. But on the other hand, those are the types of companies that have been perhaps a little bit more confident in spending. What I would say is the good news for us is we're not overly weighted on any specific industry. The largest one for us is CPG, it's 20% of our revenue. So to the extent that some industries are going up or down, it generally is offset by another industry that takes up the additional inventory. So we are monitoring, of course, and we do think that there's a huge opportunity on the retail media network. It feels disrupted maybe currently, but it's not that the opportunity isn't there long term.

Got it. Thanks. And then just generally, if you're looking at kind of add volumes or demand, as you kind of exited Q3 into October and November, anything kind of changed, any variance to call out by geography, industry or anything along those lines?

I think the guidance that we have for Q4 sort of reflects 3 things. One is, obviously, it's at a lower rate than it was prior year, right? So we have put into the numbers sort of a lower overall market, right, for digital advertising. So that's step 1. Step 2 is specific lead to the fourth quarter, we have decent visibility around campaign's life on the measurement side of things. And based on what we see there, generally, there is a strong correlation with what we would see on the activation side. That's what the past years, the past quarters have shown. But this time around we're being a little cautious around the upper and lower parts of the guidance in case that year-end upswing on programmatic doesn't happen.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Mark Kelley with Stifel. Please proceed.

Great. Thanks very much. I just have one. And I'm going to go against the fight club here for a second, but hopefully, this is a question you can answer. But last week Meta received MRC accreditation. So we've getting a question as to whether that impacts your business on Facebook and Instagram and whether advertisers still think that they would need to use a third party like DoubleVerify. I'd love to get your bigger picture thoughts on that question and sentiment? Thank you.

Yes. Look, it's definitely a fair question. But I think if you look at all the platforms we work with, there is an absolute value to the thing that we always talk about, which is our independence, right? And there are many platforms that have their own validated verification solutions that they try to push out that provide solutions for free for advertisers. And at the end of the day, we are a trusted independent third-party arbiter quality. And I think that's been a position since day 1. I think advertisers are always going to want someone outside of the media transaction to help support their -- the quality initiatives. So I think at the end of the day, whether it's Meta or any of the other platforms, we still have an incredible value proposition to our advertisers, which is an independent full functioning multiplatform, which is important multi-platform metric that allows them to make buys and constantly make buys across any social media platform and the OpenWeb and Connected Television and mobile applications. et cetera. So I think that's the key here. So the independence and the fact that we are cross platform, not a single series of metrics that an individual platform may have, I think, is important to remember.

That makes sense. Thanks, Mark.

Our next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Please proceed.

Thank you. Thanks for squeezing me. The Internet guys on the call might know already that, and you have them on already. But from the software side, Mark, can you talk a little bit about the proportion of money that people spend on you versus the total advertisement spending? You mentioned earlier, it's kind of really worth spending the money rather than wasting it. Can you just kind of remind kind of the people that are not as familiar in terms of what the mix is? And then related to that is also like where are we in terms of penetration given the number of new customers that you kind of signed this quarter? Thank you.

Sure. Yes, I'll talk a little bit in general on the first point, which is we look at our fixed transaction fee as a percentage of the average CPM, we use it as a rule of thumb, somewhere around 1% to 2%. And that obviously varies based on the type of media some buying. But as our media mix starts to lean more towards -- the start lean more towards Connected Television. The percentage of that transaction that we take is still incredibly small for the value we deliver. And that's why I think even when we started the Q&A here, I mean we talked about why we believe we can be resilient even in downtimes. The ROI that we deliver for folks using our solution is incredibly high. And that ROI is based on the fact that we're saving them from impressions that are never viewed by human that can be potentially fraud or could actually crush their brand in the long term. So we are a very small investment for an advertiser, who is looking for a great return on their spend. So that's -- I think, again, as our product mix starts to lean more towards higher-cost media, that ROI actually increases over time. With regard to penetration, I don't know, Nicola, if you have a thought on that?

I think, Raimo, for us, this may sound like a non-answer, but the TAM is so large, and the penetration -- the fact that we still have so many greenfield opportunities, makes us feel like we have a ton of opportunities just to get more clients. We're not really thinking about tapping out the opportunity. And so we just continue to deliver the products and just going after the greenfield. And as Mark said, that the greenfield percentage of our wins is higher. I think as we -- if there is something that might happen in a slowdown is, I think clients may not switch as easily. But the fact that our greenfield is growing as a potential for new opportunities is a sign that there's still a lot of opportunities out there for us.

Yes. We shared some metrics earlier this year, which of the top 700 global advertisers, 58% of them are still not covered. And to our benefit, obviously, as we've seen FX issues over the last several quarters, we are still predominantly U.S.-based as far as our revenue is concerned, whereas a significant growth -- a significant amount of ad dollars are still spent outside the U.S. So that greenfield opportunity is both real from a dollar perspective of where our revenue comes from internationally, but also just from an advertiser perspective. We still got literally hundreds of advertisers that we don't have relationships with that out of the top 700.

Thank you, congrats.

Thank you.

The next question comes from Justin Patterson with KeyBanc. Please proceed.

Great. Thank you very much. And good afternoon. Two quick ones, if I can. First, Mark, when you look at just attention and consider that as a currency, could you talk about just which inning you're in there and perhaps just compare, contrast attention in international markets versus the U.S.? If I recall, Europe might be a little bit further ahead there. And then secondly, just going back to retail media, I believe you had some announcements there last quarter. I want to say that broadens the type of advertisers from a size perspective that you work with. So any updates on just retail media progress and potentially new clients coming in via that would be helpful? Thank you.

Sure. Let me talk a little bit about attention. We talked about it a lot because we're incredibly enthusiastic about the long-term opportunity there. And we do think it's a long play, right? When we talk about what innings we're in, I think we're in the second inning, still warming up a bit, team is on the field and start to hit their group, but it's still early days. And I think we've said this several times, which is we've got 2 tasks here. We've got client introduction and client acceptance, but we also have market introduction and market acceptance. So that market introduction, it's all about creating standards that are accepted by the industry by ensuring that there's accreditations behind tools that are used for attention. And so that the same way that people view viewability and know that there's a viewability standard. They know that they're buying an attention metric that there's a standard out there. That's a credit as well. So I think that is a big part of us getting to that next inning, which is making sure that there's industry acceptance. Market -- or market industry acceptance. Client acceptance is really something I think we're probably leaning a bit further on, which is getting this into the hands of our customers, getting them using it, I think the launch of the Authentic Attention Snapshot is a big step forward for us. They're looking at those metrics every day. They're engaging with them. So now it's all about conversion. So it is a -- again, it's a long play that we're going here for. We think that this is an investment that will pay off substantially over time, but it's still very early innings. Regarding retail media, we think that's just another great opportunity. It does open up a different -- whole different group of advertisers to us because, a, it's not just advertisers, it's not just the retailers themselves, which we've always had great relationships with, it's expanding into their networks and providing them services for small advertisers, for small OEMs that are advertising across their properties. So when we start thinking about how do we move out of just enterprise level clients, channel partners is a way of getting there. And in some ways, that those retail media networks really do become channel partners for us, getting our data in front of smaller advertisers who are looking to leverage it within retail media networks.

Thank you.

At this time, I would like to turn the call back to management for closing comments.

Thanks, everyone. Despite the challenging advertising environment ahead, we remain excited about DV's long-term secular growth story and our ability to drive continuous innovation that maximize immediate quality and performance for the world's largest brands. Have a great night.

This concludes today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and thank you for your participation, and have a great day.