Diana Shipping Inc. (DSX) Q4 2021 Earnings Report, Transcript and Summary

Greetings. Welcome to the Diana Shipping Inc. 2021 Fourth Quarter Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Ed Nebb, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.

Thank you, Hillary. Thanks to all of you for joining us. Let me remind you that under the safe harbor notice, which you can see at the end of today's news release. Certain statements made during the call, which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements under the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. For a description of the risks and uncertainties and other factors affecting these statements, please refer to the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. And now without further ado, it is my pleasure to turn the call over to Ms. Semiramis Paliou, Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, Ed. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Diana Shipping Inc.'s fourth quarter 2021 earnings call. My name is Semiramis Paliou, the company's CEO, and it is an honor to have the opportunity to present to you today. Joining me this morning on the call are Mr. Stacey Margaronis, President of Diana Shipping. Mr. Ioannis Zafirakis, CFO and Chief Strategy Officer; Mr. Eleftherios Papatrifon, Chief Operating Officer; and Ms. Maria Dede, the company's Chief Accounting Officer. Before I begin, I kindly ask everyone to review the forward-looking statements applicable to today's presentation, which can be found on Page 2 of this presentation. This has been a financially strong year and a fantastic fourth quarter. Market conditions remained robust during the last quarter and contributed to making 2021 the best year dry bulk market since 2008. Throughout last year, we took advantage of the favorable market conditions, and we were able to increase our profitability, further strengthen our balance sheet, reduce our cash flow breakeven points and lock in positive cash flows, which have allowed us to initiate what we believe to be a sustainable quarterly dividend based on the current market conditions. Now let's turn to Page 4, Slide 4. I will review with you the company's snapshot as of today. Further to the consummation of the OceanPal spinoff, which resulted in the disposal of 3 of our older vessels, undertaking delivery of our recent acquisition, the motor vessel Leonidas PC last week. We find ourselves owning and operating 34 vessels in the water with a carrying capacity of approximately 4.4 million deadweight tonnes, 4 vessels of which remain unmortgaged. We expect our fleet to grow by 1 vessel by the end of this quarter after we take delivery of our previously announced resale newbuild Capesize acquisition, the motor vessel, Florida. Our fleet utilization has remained at very high levels, coming in at 99.1% for the full year 2021 as compared to 97.9% for 2020. 32 vessels in our fleet are managed in-house by Diana Shipping Services and 2 vessels are managed via 50-50 joint venture, Diana Wilhelmsen Management Limited. At the end of the fourth quarter, we employed 819 at sea and ashore. Moving on now on to Slide 5. I will go over the highlights of the fourth quarter and recent developments. More specifically, in late November of last year, we completed the spin-off transaction of OceanPal Inc., which we believe rewarded and created value for our shareholders. As previously disclosed, OceanPal acquired 3 of our oldest vessels and began trading on the NASDAQ capital market as a separate and independent company. In December, we successfully concluded our tender offer and repurchased approximately 3.5 million common shares at a price of $4.25 per share. We believe that this action represents once again a strong vote of confidence for the long-term prospects of our company. Also in December, we agreed to purchase a modern Japanese-built resale newbuilding Capesize vessels. The vessel will be named Florida, and we expect her to be delivered to us in late March. This vessel is being built under very high standards with the latest environmental and technological specifications. This acquisition is another step forward for the renewal of our fleet. In January of this year, we received approval for the listing of our USD 125 million senior secured bond in the Oslo Stock Exchange. The listing became effective in February. Also in February, we took delivery of our 2011 Japanese built Kamsarmax vessel, the motor vessel Leonidas P.C. and she has already begun trading profitably in our fleet. The strong profitability and positive cash flow generation in the fourth quarter has enabled us to be able to declare an increased cash dividend for the fourth quarter of $0.20 per share. This is double the cash dividend we paid last quarter and demonstrates our ability to pay very attractive dividends under the current market conditions. Our Board will continue evaluating those conditions for the declaration of potential additional dividends for the quarters to come. Lastly, our consistent chartering strategy has allowed us to have currently secured approximately USD 184 million of contracted revenues for full year 2022 with 62% contract coverage and USD 25.6 million of contracted revenues for 2023 with 8% contracted coverage. Ioannis will provide later on, a more detailed analysis of our cash flow generation potential based on the current market environment. Turning now to the financial highlights of the fourth quarter of 2021, on Slide 6. We find ourselves, as of December 31, 2021, with a cash and cash equivalents position of USD 126.8 million, including restricted cash as against USD 82.9 million as of December 31, 2020. Our debt, net of deferred financing costs, stood at USD 423.7 million at the end of the fourth quarter of 2021 as against USD 420.3 million at the end of 2020. Our time charter revenues for the quarter -- for the fourth quarter of 2021 amounted to USD 68.8 million as against USD 42.7 million for the fourth quarter of 2020. Lastly, our earnings per share for the fourth quarter of 2021 came in at $0.48 versus a loss of $0.10 per share for the same period of 2020. Ioannis will go over this as well as the full year numbers in more detail further on in the presentation. Moving on to Slide 7. We find a summary of all of our recent chartering activities. Once again, consistent with our conservative and disciplined chartering strategy, we have taken advantage of the robust chartering market and have secured attractive time charters for 13 vessels of our fleet. More specifically, we chartered 5 Panamax to Post-Panamax vessels at a weighted average daily rate of USD 21,176 and for a remaining average period of 348 days per vessel. We have also chartered 8 Capesize vessels at a weighted average rate of $25,038 per day for a remaining average period of 369 days. It should be noted that the fourth quarter's fixtures were of a significantly longer duration than the ones of the third quarter. We intend to keep chartering our vessels in a similar way, by staggering maturities, locking in cash flows and positioning us in a manner that allows us to continue to participate in the market in a balanced way. Ioannis will provide more insight on this when he goes over our employment strategy in more detail later on during the presentation. And I now turn it over to him to go over the financials in more detail.

Thank you, Semiramis, I'm very pleased to be discussing today, as always, with you, the Diana’s operational results for the fourth quarter and the year-end December 31, 2021. For the quarter ended December 31, 2021, we recorded a net income attributed to common stockholders of $39.7 million. That's $0.51 per basic share or $0.48 per diluted share. This includes, of course, a $15.3 million gain from the spin-off of OceanPal. But $0.18 per diluted share. Our time charter revenues increased from $42.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2020 to $68.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2021, which is an increase of about 61%; although if you remember, we have reduced the number of vessels in our fleet. Of course, that's a result of our chartering strategy and at the same time, the increase in the charter rates. We decreased our voyage expenses by $800,000 in the quarter compared to the $3 million for the same quarter in 2020. And we had a gain on bankers of $2.8 million compared to $200,000 of loss we had last year. Our vessel operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2021 decreased by about 19% to $18.2 million compared to $22.4 million last year. Of course, that's due to the fact that we have less vessels. But at the same time, we managed to decrease the per vessel OpEx, which we're going to see that later on. Our general and administrative expenses increased to $8.1 million compared to $7 million for the same quarter last year, mainly due to increased costs on restricted stock awards and legal and audit fees that was partly offset by decreased payroll costs. Interest and finance costs increased in this quarter due to the increased interest resulting from increased average debt compared to the same quarter last year and increased amortization of financing fees resulting from loan refinancings. As mentioned above, during the quarter, the company completed the spinoff of OceanPal and 3 subsidiaries owning 3 or 4 the older vessels of our fleet. With this transaction, the company was able to benefit from the increased market values of the vessels and realized a gain of $15.3 million, decreased the average days of the fleet and provide value to its shareholders by distributing the shares of OceanPal as a dividend. Now if we look at the year-end numbers at December 31, 2021, net income attributed to common stockholders amounted to $51.6 million. That's $0.64 per basic share or $0.61 per diluted share, including the gain from the spin-off mentioned earlier. The time charter revenues again increased to $214 million in 2021 compared to $169.7 million last year for the same reasons that we explained earlier. The voyage expenses decreased to $5.6 million compared to $13.5 million in 2020. Again, this is due to a gain from bunkers compared to a loss that we had last year of $3.7 million. In total, the general and administrative expenses decreased to $29.2 million compared to $32.8 million in 2020, mainly due to the accelerated vesting of restricted sales of Board members in 2020 and also due to decreased payroll costs and D&O insurance. Interest and financing costs amounted to $20.2 million compared to $21 million last year due to decreased average debt and interest rates. Of course, that decrease was partly offset by increased amortization of financing -- finance charges due to this year's loan financing. If we move to the balance sheet data, as of December 31, 2021, our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash increased to $126.8 million. I have to mention here that the restricted amount on this number is only $16.5 million. And compared to $82.9 million that we had in total in December 31, 2020. And of course, that's because of the increased cash from operations, the sales of vessels and due to the refinancing agreements we entered into 2021. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2021, the long-term debt of ours, net of deferred financing costs amounted to $423.7 million compared to $420.3 million as of December 31, 2020. Vessels, net decreased to $643.5 million compared to $716.2 million last year due to the sale of 4 vessels of ours and the contribution of 3 vessels to OceanPal. Moving to the selected financial data. As of December 31, 2020, we had agreed to sell 3 vessels, which were delivered to their new owners in the first quarter of 2021. Additionally, in the first quarter of 2021, we agreed to sell the vessel Naias, which was delivered to her owners in July 2021. In addition, in November 2021, we completed the spin-off of OceanPal with the contribution of 3 vessels. The removal of these vessels from our fleet resulted in less ownership days during the reported quarter and year 2021 compared to the same periods last year. Nevertheless, fleet utilization for the fourth quarter of 2021 remained the same with the respective quarter of last year at 19.6%. The improvement of the market conditions in 2021 was such that our daily time charter equivalent rate for the quarter of 2021, almost doubled compared to the fourth quarter last year, an increase to $21,364 from $10,940. As I was saying earlier, at the same time, we managed to reduce our daily operating expenses for the fourth quarter of 2021 at 5,657 compared to $6,089 for the same quarter of 2020, which represents a decrease of approximately 7%. That decrease is mainly due to decreased average crew costs, insurances and operating expenses. In 2021, fleet utilization increased to 99.1% compared to 97.9% in 2020, and that is due to the fact that we had less of 5 days in 2021 compared to 2020. The daily time charter equivalent rate in 2021 increased to $15,759 compared to $10,910 last year for the same reasons we explained. We also managed to improve our daily operating expenses for the whole year, which decreased by 3% compared to $5,596 compared to $5,750 last year. That decrease was mainly due -- the fact that we managed to have decreased expenses for spares and repairs and other operating expenses. Moving to the debt amortization profile of ours. We have mentioned that in the past. But if you remember, we have concluded 3 loan refinancing agreements, one with ABN AMRO $91 million, which was concluded in May 2021 to refinance 5 existing loans, another one with Nordea for $125 million bond concluded in June 2021 to refinance part of our $100 million bond, which we repurchased in full in September 2021. And the third was a loan agreement with Nordea. All of these agreements were made with the purpose of extending the maturities of our loans to future periods. You understand that this enhances the ability of the company to pay dividend to our shareholders. As a result, under the current debt amortization profile, we expect to pay the first balloon payment in the third quarter of 2023. So it is clear to me and to the company that the current debt amortization profile has strengthened the company's balance sheet and position in the market to the effect that I explained earlier. Moving to the next slide. You can see here our breakeven, which as of December 31, our breakeven rate that you see there includes all of our expenses, stood at $13,991 per share per vessel per day. Now if we compare that with the average daily time charter rate that we expect to achieve from our time charter agreements already fixed until February 22 of 2022, it is evident that the average rate expected from these agreements will cover our costs and result to net income from operations. As you can see here in this slide, we have already fixed as we have -- we have a fixed base of 38% for 2022. The secured revenues that we have explained earlier is $184 million. And also you can see, if you remember the last presentation of ours that the average contract duration have increased to over -- a little bit over a year. In the previous quarter, it was below a year. Moving to the next slide. You can see that the already fixed days they cover the cash flow breakeven of ours. And whatever else is going to be fixed for 2022, essentially is going to be free cash flow. You can see that on the slide that we have here, if we assume that our vessels are going to be started as per the rates below which are the FFA's rates. So in this slide, it is for us, it gives us a kind of assurance to believe that our dividend capacity is going to be there for the 2022. And our Board of Directors during the next quarter and the quarter after that, and even further down the road, will be able to declare a very nice dividend for our shareholders. And with that, I would like to pass the presentation to Stacey Margaronis for the market overview, as we do in every quarter. Stacey.

Thank you, Ioannis. One can certainly not criticize the dry bulk market for not providing sufficient excitement over the last year or so to investors, shipping analysts, shipping bankers and all involved in this sector of shipping. Apart from the booming container sector, the dry bulk sector must certainly take second place as regard the recent, at least, volatility among various sectors of shipping. We would, therefore, like to start this last section of our presentation with 2 slides depicting the dry bulk indices versus the 12-month time charter rates of large bulkers. So in Slides 17 and 18, they help us reconfirm the much greater volatility affecting the spot market compared to the volatility we have witnessed over the last few quarters in the 12-month time charter rates for large bulkers. For example, the Capesize 12-month time charter rate moved from about $36,000 a day in the early part of last October to $24,000 a day in January of this year. In comparison, the spot Baltic Cape Index went from a high of 10,485 equivalent to about $87,000 per day 5TC average in October last year to a low of 702 in January of this year, the equivalent of $5,826 per day on the 5TC average. As Clarksons point out, Capesize spot earnings averaged a mere $8,000 per day during January and the first half of February this year. It has always been known that spot trading large bulk carriers was not for the fainthearted, but we feel it is interesting to see this extreme volatility expressed in concrete numbers. These oscillations and violent fluctuations at Diana's chartering strategy, which has been described several times in the past, seeks to smooth out over time. On the next Slide, 19, we look at the main demand driver for the bulk shipping industry, which is global GDP growth. Unfortunately, the IMF has been downsizing GDP growth estimates over the last few months. For example, world GDP is expected to increase 4.4% this year, down from the previous forecast of 5%. The forecast is still a 3.8% growth for 2023. For China, the GDP growth forecast has come down to 4.8% from 5.6% for 2022 and stands at 5.2% for 2023. In the United States, it's -- the economy is expected to grow by 4% this year, down from 5.2% estimate and 2.6% in 2023. As for the Euro area, GDP growth is expected to come in at 3.9% this year and 2.5% for 2023. According to Braemar, the IMF has cited several key reasons behind their latest downward revisions. Firstly, the new COVID-19 variant, Omicron, with introduction of mobility restrictions and consequent lower economic activity. This has coincided with a period of high energy prices and continued supply chain disruptions, resulting in higher inflation than previously expected. Lastly, the depressed Chinese real estate sector and slower recovery of private consumption have capped growth prospects. All these are bound to affect slightly the demand increase forecast for the transportation of dry bulk commodities. More importantly, however, as Braemar points out, the war in the Ukraine may have a broad-based negative impact on the dry bulk market with ports in the Black Sea, halting operations for an undetermined period of time. We have already started to see some initial negative effects on trade in that area. Turning to steel production. According to Maersk Broker, global production of steel reached 1.95 billion tonnes in 2021, which was up 4% from the prior year. Chinese steel production dropped 3% last year, while according to Banchero Costa, steel production outside China increased by 14% year-on-year in 2021. According to Clarksons, given the existing restrictions in China on crude steel output, Chinese iron ore imports are expected to remain under pressure this year. Turning to iron ore on Slide 19. On a worldwide basis, iron ore imports are projected to increase by 1% this year and remained steady during 2023. According to Clarksons, Chinese seaborne iron ore imports are currently projected to decline by a further 1% in 2022 after dropping by 3% in 2021. As regards to coking coal, global coking coal trade is initially projected to grow by around 4% in the full year 2022 as steel demand and production looks set to continue to grow steadily in key regions around the globe. Growth of about 3% is projected for 2023. For steam coal, worldwide demand is currently projected by Clarksons to grow by 1% this year with lower economic growth and rising domestic production in China, where government policy seems to provide limited support for imports of this commodity. Chinese seaborne thermal coal imports are initially projected to decline by 13% this year. Even though, as Clarksons pointed out, this outcome is by no means certain. According to Commodore Research, a positive for coal imports in China is that hydropower electricity production has continued to fall on a year-on-year basis. However, electricity production from other renewable sources, such as wind power production, solar and even nuclear energy has been increasing steadily. In Slides 19 and 20, we can look at the overall coal trade and mentioned that Howe Robinson believed that with price pressure building up on all energy sources during 2021, coal prices of both thermal and coking coal went up dramatically. After a decade of low prices and declining investment in the coal industry, supply has tightened. This was made worse by labor shortages, heavy rains and limited access to heavy machinery, which made it impossible for miners to even maintain previous volumes of coal exports. Even Europe, where coal consumption has been strongly discouraged for years, increased its coal imports, which even at $261 per tonne, remain well below the equivalent gas prices. This difference will widen even further in favor of coal with the anticipated increase in gas prices following Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Main exporters of coal worldwide in 2021 were Australia with 31%; Indonesia, 28%; and Russia, 15% of exports. In view of the imminent trade sanctions, Russia's coal exports to Europe and the West as well as elsewhere in the world will probably have to be replaced by coal from other exporters, including South Africa. Therefore, a combination of tight supply and high prices may, according to Howe Robinson, limit coal's positive impact on the dry bulk trade in 2022. Let's turn to grain imports now. According to Clarksons, the overall global seaborne grain trade is projected to grow by about 3.7% this year and by a further 2.2% in 2023. Uncertainty prevails due to several factors, not least of which is the developing Ukraine Russia situation. In this respect, it is interesting to note that according to Clarksons, from the 542 million total grain exports expected to be shipped in 2022. 50 million tonnes are expected to come from Ukraine and the further 46.6 million tonnes from Russia. A conservative assumption would be that a large part of these exports will not happen and will be replaced with cargo from other exporting areas, mainly in North and South America. During the first quarter of 2022, most of the soybean exports to China coming from North and South America will now come solely from the U.S. due to soybean crop damage caused by adverse weather conditions affecting primarily Brazil. On Slide 21, we can look at the dry bulk order book and supply side issue. According to Banchero Costa, in 2021, there were just 353 dry bulk carriers delivered with an aggregate capacity of 35.8 million deadweight. This was down about 25% in deadweight terms compared to 2020. In 2022, the expectation is for about 332 units of 28.26 million deadweight to join the bulk carrier fleet after accounting for slippage and cancellations. From these deliveries, about 52 are expected to be Capes and VLOCs with a dead weight of about 10.5 million deadweight. According to Banchero Costa net fleet growth in 2021 came in at about 4% year-on-year. Net fleet growth in 2022 is expected to be 2% with a further small increase of 1% to take place in 2023. The order book for Capesize bulk carriers remain modest. According to Clarksons, there are 26.4 million deadweight of Capesize and post Capes on order, representing 7% of the dry bulk fleet. Most of these ships will be delivered this year and next approximately 11 million deadweight each year according to Banchero Costa. Net Cape and VLOC fleet growth this year is expected to be approximately 2% and about the same in 2023. There are 19.2 million deadweight worth of Panamaxes on order, which is about 8.1% of the total Panamax fleet. About 9.3 million deadweight will be delivered this year and 10.5 million in 2023. The order book for smaller bulkers is even lower, giving a total bulk carrier fleet newbuilding order book of 64.1 million deadweight, equivalent to only 6.8% of the total bulk carrier fleet. Looking quickly at congestion. As we will also mention later on, congestion in ports around the world is keeping about 36% of the active fleet tied up, waiting to lower the discharge. 2 weeks ago, congestion increased by 84 vessels in only 1 week, and that was only at major Australian and South American loading ports as well as Chinese discharging ports. The pre-COVID-19 average from 2016 to 2019 stood at around 30% of the active fleet. According to Clarksons now looking at the green transition. About 35% of vessels on order measured by GRT are set to use alternative fuels, primarily LNG. LPG fuel is dominant for new LPG carriers, while there have been several orders for methanol-fueled container ships, although there remains a great deal of uncertainty over timing and technology choices. The fueling transition is expected to be a key driver for fleet renewal and new building interest at shipyards over the coming years. Diana's forthcoming addition to the fleet, the Japanese newbuilding Capesize vessel, Florida, will be fueled by low sulfur fuel and powered by Tier 3 main engine and auxiliary engines as regards sulfur oxide emissions and nitrogen oxide emissions. Turning to the outlook now, for our industry. We agree with Commodore Research that it is encouraging to see that in 2021, ordering activity stayed well below the highs seen in 2013, '14, even as spot rates have been faring much better than they did then. We also agree with Clarksons that the outlook for the dry bulk carrier market in 2022 remains positive even if full-year earnings could fall short of 2021's extremely healthy levels. Similar views are expressed by Commodore Research on bulk carrier rates, at least for this year. The IMF predictions for lower growth this year come to pass. It is likely that seasonality will certainly help boost the dry bulk market in the short and medium term, but there is no guarantee that 2022, as a whole, will fare as well as last year. Fundamentals appear fairly balanced with the projected 2.5% growth in bulk carrier tonne-mile demand against a projected fleet growth of 2.1% for 2022. For next year, supply is expected to grow by between 0.3% and 1% depending on scrapping forecasts, slippage and other factors. Congestion, as mentioned earlier on in this presentation, stood in mid-February, close to a record 36% of the total fleet, and this might continue providing support going forward. As usual, future dry bulk carrier earnings will depend on development in supply and demand. These are particularly important now after the market has been through a period of fine balance between supply and demand for several quarters prior to 2021. As a result of this period of stability, significant strength or weakness in rates surfaces even with relatively minor changes in supply/demand balance. And this is what we have been witnessing in 2021 and the early part of this year. At this point, I will pass the call to our CEO, again, Semiramis Paliou, for a summary of the highlights of this presentation.

Thank you, Stacey. So before we open this call up to Question-and-Answer Session, I would like to sum up what I believe to be the most important point. The company has produced solid returns, has a strong balance sheet and continues to take advantage of the robust market while maintaining a low cash flow breakeven point. We remain committed to our disciplined and balanced strategy and its value is clearly demonstrated and appreciated even more so under the current volatile geopolitical environment. We are focused in finding creative ways to potentially grow and renew our fleet in a conservative manner. And last but not least, we are very pleased to be able to pay out a higher quarterly dividend, and we aim to continue paying out future dividends should market conditions allow us. Now I will turn it over to the operator to commence the Q&A session.

[Operator Instructions] Our first question is from Randy Giveans of Jefferies.

I guess first question around the dividend and capital allocation there, increasing it from $0.10 to $0.20 above our expectations there. So what went into making that decision? And how will you balance further dividend payments with share repurchases in the coming quarters?

I think the $0.20 decision can easily be seen based on our fixed income for 2022 and some of 2023. And the current environment, I think, the generation of free cash flow is such that everyone can see that the ability to pay $0.20 this quarter and even something higher over the next quarter is there easily. As regards to the purchasing of the tender offer, buying back shares or doing something else with the money, of course, that will depend on the price of our stock and whether there is a clear value or we are clearly undervalued. We still have that option to do a lot of things there. But I personally strongly believe that the period has come where the stock price will appreciate and be priced based on the yields that we are going to be providing, yields that I think everyone can see that it is sustainable for the quarters to come. So the -- to respond to your question about the tender offerings, I don't think that it's going to be an option because I don't think that the pricing of our stock is going to be short, but we are going to do it.

Yes, I think in the long run, that is certainly…

Knowing me for many years, I'm never very optimistic. So whatever I'm saying now, you have to take into account.

I guess just to clarify on the dividend, you mentioned that it could be even higher in the coming quarters. So is $0.20, was there something special about this quarter? Or is it fair to expect as long as the rates stay robust, that 20% dividend should be…

That $0.20 is not derived from something especially of this quarter. It's not.

Second question, just looking at the fleet strategy. Clearly, there's been a big uptick here in recent weeks on spot rates on the FFA curve. Are you seeing the same moves in the time charter market? And then with that, is the plan just to continue to extend 10 to 16 month charters as vessels become available.

I'm going to take that question at the beginning, and then Eleftherios may answer as well. But you understand that the more we go into better and better markets, something that is possible to happen, the more you will see us extending the charter period, something that we have done in the past. And if you noticed, we have already increased the hedging period of ours, nothing fantastic, but we are over a year -- or we are having our revenues for over a year. Looking at what is happening around the world today, I think, once again, our strategy demonstrates the value that we create for our shareholders. And if someone was to be asked, what he was going to -- he would prefer today's current environment to be either totally spot or totally fixed, I think this is no brainer that that they were going to say that we prefer the hedging strategy like Diana. Eleftherios?

No, yes. I mean, I think you've covered most of the points. The other thing is that we are -- despite the volatility that we have seen for the last couple of days, as you mentioned, Randy, the FFA curve is still pricing is pricing Panamaxes and Capes, let's say, for the remainder of the year in the mid- to high 20s range. And then for 2023 in the high teens to low 20s. So basically, the opportunity is there to replicate the pictures that we've done recently. And then for over a year, maybe 1.5 years, maybe even higher if 2023 starts moving a little bit higher. So I think we're going to stay the course and do what we have been doing over the course of the last quarter.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is from Randy Giveans of Jefferies.

I guess if no one else is asking questions, I'll ask one more. Just around Russia, Ukraine. I think Stacey had some comments around it in terms of the coal trade. But if you could also give some commentary around grains and maybe other exports out of the region and maybe the replacement of those cargoes from other regions into Western Europe? Or just a little more context around what you're seeing so far? Obviously, it's early, but anything you can share would be helpful.

Well, to be honest, we have not heard of any canceled cargoes up to now. So theoretically, if you look at the numbers as of this afternoon, Greek time, there has been very little effect in ships loading grain from the area, both Russia and the Ukraine or coal. One of Diana's ships is loading now and finishing later today, a coal cargo. And we feel that she's going to leave without incident and on time after going to anchorage early tomorrow and then sailing. So we can't -- apart from the attack to some cargo ships that have been publicized recently or today rather than yesterday, both the Kerch Strait and the Sea of Azov. Even though the Sea of Azov is officially closed to commercial traffic has not been an area where ships have been delayed in loading or discharging. So the situation in Taman where the Leto is loading, which is at the mouth of the Sea of Azov is completely stable and operations are running in a normal manner without any issues or changes. So we can't answer your question, unfortunately, because we have no data apart from 3 attacks that have been reported, 2 on bulk carriers, a Turkey ship, a tanker, which is the Nomura Queen and the small other vessel bulker of 2,000 tonnes. The tanker is reportedly sinking. And the other ships were damaged, and there has been some loss of life. So these are the reports that we have received through the P&I Club and the war risk insurance about shipping in the area, and these are confirmed reports. So our master is using best endeavors and practice to be aware and avoid entering temporarily dangerous areas periodically announced on the approaches during naval -- navy drills, but we haven't been advised of any yet. So trade seems to be going on as usual, except for these 3 attacks that we hear, which are going to lead, of course, to restrictions in approaching some or most of these ports, but they have not yet been announced.

Randy, you understand that usually this type of disruptions, they work in the favor of the dry bulk market on the shipping in general. We have seen that in the past many times. Delaying changes of routes and so on and so forth.

There are no more questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to management for closing remarks.

So thank you all for joining us today, and we look forward to talking to you again in our next financial results call. Thank you very much.

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a great day.