Good day and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the DiamondRock Hospitality Company Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. . Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Briony Quinn. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Michelle. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to DiamondRock's second quarter 2022 earnings call and webcast. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that many of our comments today are not historical facts and are considered to be forward-looking statements under Federal Securities Laws. As described in our filings with the SEC, these statements are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our comments today. In addition, on today's call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial information. A reconciliation of this information to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure can be found in our earnings press release. With that, I'm pleased to turn the call over to Mark Brugger, our President and Chief Executive Officer.

Thank you, and welcome again to DiamondRock's earnings call. I'm joined by our executive team today, including Justin Leonard, our recently appointed Chief Operating Officer and Head of Asset Management. I'm confident that Justin's intelligence and extensive background in private equity will advanced DiamondRock's strong track record of capital allocation and continue its history of delivering best-in-class results for shareholders. We are in a golden age of travel. Consumer expenditures are turning away from durable goods, briefly popular during the pandemic. Today, consumers are seeking out cherished, shared experiences, such as travel and dining out together. Travelers are clearly back on the road. We expect DiamondRock will benefit not only from this pent-up demand, but from the resumption and acceleration of the robust secular growth that began before the pandemic. The secular growth going forward is likely driven by several factors, unprecedented consumer savings, a preference for experiences over things, multi-generational travel, the Wanderlust of the millennial generation, and not to be underappreciated the Baby Boomers. And a dispersed hybrid workforce that gives rise to both be leisure trips and more small group meetings. Each of these are to tonic shifts for travel. DiamondRock was an early mover to reposition our portfolio towards lifestyle and resort hotels to maximize the benefit from these trends. And we expect to have outperformance over the next several years from our unique portfolio of destination resorts and urban hotels. We are very happy to report today that DiamondRock has set new records for performance in the second quarter. We set records for RevPAR, total revenues, and most importantly, hotel EBITDA and funds from operations. I am most proud of the fact that we have recovered over 94% of 2019 year-to-date FFO per share. In the second quarter, FFO per share was more than 12%…

Thanks Mark. It was a terrific quarter for the company. Let's look at the results and note that throughout our prepared remarks, when we give comparable stats to 2019, it excludes the Kimpton Fort Lauderdale Resort because that hotel is new and was not open in 2019. Okay. Total comparable revenues for the company were $279 million in the quarter, an increase of $132 million over the comparable period in the prior year. Comparable RevPAR for the portfolio in the second quarter was $223 or 6.9% higher than 2019. This growth was driven by room rates nearly 18% above 2019. Occupancy is still down 750 basis points to 2019, but momentum was strong with significant improvement over the 1,600 basis point gap in the first quarter. Closing this gap is one of several sources of future upside to revenues and profits. Same-store adjusted EBITDA margins were 36.1% beating 2019 by 182 basis points. Other revenue, which speaks directly to our asset management team's creativity in identifying and expanding new income streams was up nearly 17% or $3 million over 2019. I also want to point out that F&B revenue is nearly $4 million above 2019, despite the fact occupancy was 750 basis points below 2019. This is almost exclusively due to the higher restaurant and bar outlet sales from venues we created and opened with well-known chefs like Michael Mina, Richard Sandoval, and Vivian Howard just prior to or during the pandemic that are driving dramatically more restaurant business to the hotels. Hotel adjusted EBITDA was $101 million, which beat Q2 2019 by nearly $12 million. Adjusted EBITDA was $92 million, a double-digit increase over 2019. And the stat I am most proud of is that our FFO per share was $0.36 or 12.5% above second quarter 2019. Let me…

Thanks, Jeff. Our outlook remains highly constructive for travel. In fact, we have increased our expectation from our last earnings call and now project comparable total hotel revenues to exceed 2019 levels of $936 million for the full-year of 2022 and for comparable hotel adjusted EBITDA to exceed 2019 levels of $278 million for this calendar year with the potential for a new high watermark for profit margins. Our resorts continue to push ahead with record demand, while group and business transient demand at our urban hotels is kicking in to provide a double benefit in the portfolio's recovery trajectory. Ultimately, we continue to believe that we will stabilize at higher portfolio profit margins based on the portfolio's strategic positionings for new travel trends, the implementation of best practices from this downturn, and the boost from ROI projects. Our record profit margins in the second quarter certainly put us in good stead to achieve this goal. On that note, I should mention that we have several other high ROI projects underway or under evaluation at our hotels in Sedona, Burlington and Boston. Collectively, the incremental stabilized EBITDA associated with those three projects is about $8 million. This doesn't even include the benefit from numerous other smaller projects in progress throughout many of our properties. Our asset management team is quite relentless in finding value-add opportunities at our hotels. On the external growth front, we completed the acquisition of the Kimpton Fort Lauderdale Beach Resort in April. This deal capped off approximately $330 million in acquisitions over the last year. All five of the recent acquisitions have the qualities we are seeking. They are independent, lifestyle hotels located in high barrier-to-entry markets with terminable level management agreements and operations that could benefit from superior asset management. While we have significant dry powder for future acquisitions, we will remain very disciplined. In fact, during the quarter, we carefully evaluated a West Coast Boutique Resort, but terminated based on valuation after completing intensive due diligence. To wrap up, we are still early in an emerging travel recovery with significant pent-up demand. And with that backdrop, we are confident that DiamondRock has a unique portfolio with the right strategy and balance sheet to continue to distinguish itself in 2022 and going forward. At this time, we would like to open up the call for any questions.

Thank you. . Our first question comes from the line of Dori Kesten with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon. As you look out for the remainder of the year, would you expect to be able to maintain the elevated levels of margin gains versus 2019 at your resorts?

Dori, this is Mark. Yes. So the margins are going to vary a little bit depending on what the higher rated seasons are. So it'll vary by month-to-month, but in the higher rated seasons, we would expect similar margin gains and then the lower rated season it'll be harder to push the margins. But collectively, we would anticipate that our resorts are going to end this year at about 30% higher EBITDA than they did in 2019.

Okay. Jeff, can you give more detail on the range of special dividends you may payout in Q4?

I don't want to give the guidance on full-year dividends at this point, but we will have taxable income this year that won't be covered by our preferred dividends. So the $0.03 that we're paying in the quarter, I think it's quite possible that our fourth quarter obligation, whether that's a quarterly dividend or quarterly plus a special will exceed the $0.03 that we're paying out in Q3.

Okay. And can you just repeat what you said regarding swaps for interest for this year?

Sure. Just to clarify for folks just to be sure that I didn't speak is the $51 million to $52 million of interest expense guidance for full-year 2022 is purely cash interest. And that does not include the mark-to-market adjustment of our interest rate swaps, which year-to-date reduced our interest expense by about $10 million. We exclude the mark-to-market adjustment from the calculation of adjusted FFO. So for example in Q2, our cash interest expense was $9.7 million, which you'll see on the income statement that it includes the benefit of $2.7 million of the mark-to-market adjustment from the swaps, which you can find on the EBITDA to FFO reconciliation. Eliminating that benefit our cash interest in Q2 is about $12.5 million. So again, if you annualize that it's about $50 million. So thus the guidance of $51 million to $52 million is because we're expecting interest rates will just be a little bit higher in the back half of the year than the front half of the year. Hopefully that helps out.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Michael Bellisario with Baird. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Mark, I know you didn't give formal guidance, but kind of relative to the 2019 metrics that you did provide just sort of big picture kind of what risks, whether macro or industry specific are you focused on in the back half of the year that would either let you exceed or potentially end up short of those kind of qualitative guidance ranges you've provided so far?

Yes. I mean let's take by the three segments. So group looks pretty solid. The outside the room spend has kind of exceeded our expectations every week for the last certainly 16 weeks. So that that feels kind of like a low risk -- excuse me, a low risk proposition for the balance of the year. Business Transient has been coming on strong. I think it'll continue to come on strong we're encouraged I mean, if you just read the Wall Street Journal this morning by the capital investments of Pepsi and GM and some of the stats are here and in the earnings calls, which are usually good corollaries to that, they seem good. And then I think we'll have to see exactly how the resorts play out in September and October. We've had extended shoulder seasons, we believe that a lot of that will kind of continue. And we have good leisure bookings into September/October. But we'll see at the end of the day, make sure all that materializes as we have to fill up the rest of the hotels.

So it sounds like for you leisure is the risk, is that on the demand side or on the rate side?

Yes. I think if you kind of did by segment, it's probably group, BT, leisure rate.

Got it. Helpful. And then just maybe for you and/or Justin, just maybe a little bit more background just on kind your expertise, your skillset, and kind of what opportunities you see within the DiamondRock portfolio today.

Sure, Mike. Happy to take that. Look, I think I hopefully bring a bit of a different approach. I come into this post via a little different path than a lot of people hold this seat in the industry, really through the real estate side as opposed to through the operation side. So hopefully I bring a bit of a different perspective, I think it could be helpful to the team overall. But what I sort of think about what my job is here at DiamondRock, I really don't think it's too dissimilar to what my job was over the last 23 years of private equity. I've got a collection of 34 hotels I need to come up with a business plan. I've heard how to make them worth more three, four, five years down the road than they're currently worth. That's really the way that I intend to approach this new role within the organization. I think that can be -- I can also be helpful in portfolio allocation and how we do capital allocation, but I think my primary goal is really to look at these individual real estate assets and figure out how to make them more valuable. That's what I've been successful at doing in my previous career and hopefully what I could do here.

Yes. Mike, I would just add for, we're pretty well-oiled machine when it comes to the operations and the value-add design, all those aspects. So we're going to take what is pretty well oiled machine. And then I think the thought with Justin is it's another very smart real estate mind providing a different perspective that can layer on top of that. And hopefully, really produce outsized NAV growth at the assets over the next three, five years as we kind of come up with ultimate business plans. And Justin's whole focus of private equity is always how do you increase NAV, right? And so we're taking what works very well from operations to profit margins quarter-to-quarter and looking out, but adding another focus on long-term NAV accretion at these hotels. So we're very optimistic and Justin's track record is just absolutely excellent. So we really think it's just another ingredient to add to success of the future of DiamondRock.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Austin Wurschmidt with KeyBanc. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Great. Thanks. Just Mark, going back to your comments about hotel revenue and EBITDA exceeding 2019. The first half of the year, you were up 8% versus the comparable period in 2019. I'm just curious if you were to ring fence a little bit around what you think the back half of the year, do you think it could be similar a little bit better, a little bit softer? Just curious about your thoughts there.

Yes. I mean, July we reported today was -- that was ahead of our expectations. It's remaining strong. RevPAR was up 11%. I think what's interesting in July too is the total RevPAR was up better than 11%. It was up 12.6% as outside the room spend at urban really started kicking in and contributing to profitability. I've never in my career since so much short-term big group booking and such quick kind of turnaround on a lot of the business that we're getting so. It's hard to put parameters. I'm confident. It's probably going to turn out better than our current forecast is. That's why we have a lot of confidence in telling you and communicating to the Street that we think it's better than 2019 full-year basis. But it could be a little better or it could be a lot better. And based on the trends we've had, certainly in the last 16 weeks, I'll say every week seems to be getting better. We continue even I was looking at last week's adjustment of forecast for the balance of the year. We saw it increase again for the back half of the year. So I think we don't want to give too much guidance because there is so much short-term booking. But certainly, the trend in July was encouraging and the setup looks pretty good for the balance of the year. So we're feeling very positive here.

I appreciate the comments. And then BT revenue, you said kind of taking the first and second quarter averages, I want to say it was right around roughly percent -- 80% of 2019 levels in the first half. I mean where do you think we can finish the year on the BT revenue side and when do you think I guess we can get back to that 2019 level either on a quarterly or monthly basis?

Yes. I mean, there's always guesswork what's going on with some of the macro trends, but we could in 2023 be back to a 100% of BT, but I think we're all trying to figure out where it settles. So there's some give and take about. On the positives I think there's more need for people to get on the road, especially as they're a little bit more disconnected, the hybrid environment from clients, et cetera, but then there's the offset of their, you got to make sure you're -- person you're busy is in their office. So I think we're all kind of waiting to see where that sells out, but it was ahead of our expectations in Q2. And I think post Labor Day, we're fairly optimistic that we're going to start really, really getting back to more normal business travel. But I would hate to overpromise exactly when that -- when we get fully back up there, but we're confident that business travel is always evolving. It'll be a little bit different, but it'll settle out somewhere in the neighborhood of where it used to be. And then I think things like small group will have to accelerate and be higher than they've ever been historically. As it -- as a consequence of having hybrid work environments and still needing to advance culture, launch products, all the reasons that it's good to get your people together and move your companies forward in America.

And our next question comes from the line of Anthony Powell with Barclays. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. Mark, a question on your comment about the West Coast Boutique hotel and evaluations concerns there. Is that a bit you would've hit maybe a few months ago, or are you changing your underwriting or is that just something that's didn't work out?

Yes, that's a great question. It was a hotel we really liked. It was an irreplaceable location, independent, fee simple. We thought there was some value-add things to enhance. One of the major components for the value of the deal had to do with the ability to expand the boutique and add about 30% more units based on some, I'll say land use restrictions after our due diligence, we thought that that ability was more limited than we would've hoped and we weren't willing to pay for it essentially. So that was really the value gap. It's an asset, had it not been for that and had our due diligence kind of flesh that out in a positive way. It would've been a hotel that we would've done because it would've been very additive to the direction of the company. And we saw a significant amount of upside in the asset.

So you're not getting more conservative on the resort. That was just a pure asset specific issue it sounds like.

Yes, it was more of a land use issue than a valuation issue on cap rates. Now we're still -- as I still think that resorts, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, are they long-term winner versus pre-COVID. They're the ones that are going to stabilize with higher margins. I think we are under resorted as a country. It doesn't mean like every quarter they're going to continue to go up forever, but I think resorts, if you think about where the profitability will be and where the incremental demand kind of on a macro basis or secular change has occurred. I think resorts are still an excellent risk adjusted place to be investing in your capital.

Right. Kind of related I mean, you're seeing some good recovery in Chicago and Boston, and even that kind of the group hotel, I know you talked about maybe selling some of those and down the road, but doesn't make sense to hold on to a group hotel in those markets given stronger group and the recovery you're seeing.

We're actively having that conversation right now. It's a good point. I think the -- we like -- we think the optimal balance for a public lodging REIT is probably somewhere around 50% resort, 50% urban properties kind of the -- on a risk adjusted basis, how do you think about the whole 10-year cycle and maximizing returns for shareholders. We would monetize urban assets to kind of continue doing some of the lifestyle things we've been doing. I think the question right now for disposition activity is can you maximize the value given some of the dislocation happening in the debt markets? And we're actively having the conversation. I think if the debt markets get more cooperative as we move into the fall and early next year, we would certainly consider monetizing at least one asset.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Chris Woronka with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon, guys. Mark, yes, I've heard all your comments on the resorts generally agree with you on the demand front, but do you see any risk of costs going up more materially in some of these markets? I know that could come in a lot of different ways, whether it's taxes or labor other things, but I mean is that -- yes, is that actually the bigger risk than demand suddenly going away?

I mean, there's different cost category. So I mean, I think the most ferocious tax collectors are in the major cities. So I think it's less of a risk asset base are increased. Obviously you're going to pay more real estate tax over time in most these markets. But it's probably less of a risk than it would be as asset appreciations in some of the other, well call the top 10 MSA or CBDs. But I don't think the labor market listen, choose my words here. I think the labor markets, while it's still difficult to get labor everywhere in the U.S. It's getting a little bit better. I think the resort markets often there's a diversified employment pool there that is more flexible. And so I don't -- we don't see that as a disadvantage for the resorts. And one of the others -- one of the other big features on the resorts that I think helps with flow-through and profitability over time is there's just other revenue streams to tap. If you have a higher place in a market, there's just -- there's no other levers to pull at that. If you have a Margaretville in Key West, well, we added a second bar, we added a retail shop. There's other ways to market other things in there. We can offer more amenities and charge amenity fees. We can rent bikes. There's just -- there's a lot more ways to increase margins in a resort just because you have all these different revenue stream potentials. So that's something we're particularly good at and something that I think will allow the resorts to continue to run and find more opportunities that frankly just don't exist in some of the I'll call the simple urban boxes.

Okay. Fair enough. Thanks. Thanks, Mark. And then I guess, circling back to kind of performance versus where you might do acquisitions. I mean obviously your urban markets are finally starting to really pop. But it sounds like you're still going down the road of resorts on acquisitions just to get that balance you discuss, but does that preclude you from doing something urban wise, especially if you're -- if you might sell, right, if you might sell one of your more urban hotels, would you replace it with urban or you pretty much strictly focused on resorts for buys.

Yes. If you looked at our internal pipeline, it's about half urban half resort now. I mean you have to price it right for both of those. But now, we're not precluded at all from doing it. We -- I think the -- I think probably the typical urban asset in our pipeline is about 200 rooms has a good restaurant in it, has a management available, probably half of those are soft branded and half are independent. So no, it's something that we think is very viable, different urban markets have different risk profiles. But no, it's definitely on our radar screen and something we'll continue to pursue when the price is, right.

And our next question comes from the line of Bill Crow with Raymond James. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon. Mark, I've got two for you. Two, hopefully quick ones for you and one for Jeff. The two for you Mark are on resorts and leisure again. We heard earlier today that as business travel is normalizing as weekday demand is normalizing that we're also seeing some normalization on the shoulder days and that there are fewer consumers and leisure travelers taking long weekends. Is that something consistent with what you're seeing as well?

Yes. I mean, we have a portfolio of 34 hotels, so I'm not sure it's a read-through for the entire industry, but we saw incredible demand, leisure demand in our urban markets kind of the extended three-day weekend in markets like Chicago was terrific in both June and we're seeing in July and even kicking off August. So that trend seems to be good. I was looking at our all resorts aren't created equal. So you'll have a very different result maybe in Vail versus the Florida Keys versus Sedona, but they all seem to be continuing to be strong. I think we'll know more post Labor Day that's when you may see more seasonality impacted. The advanced bookings look pretty good, but it's -- they're not a 100% sold out, so we'll see how it plays out this fall. But we're relatively optimistic, but we'll see it when it actually gets to as months exactly how dynamic it is. It'll certainly be significantly over 2019 levels. But we'll -- yes. How dynamic it turns out to be again I hate to overpromise.

Yes. No, that's okay. I -- that gives me a good transition when you talk about 2019, because it seems like next year when we're looking at 2023 numbers, the better comp is really the 2022. And I think people are going to kind of give up on the 2023 comparison. And so how do you think your resort portfolio does in that comparison to 2022? Can you -- to 20 -- yes, 2022. Can you have positive RevPAR growth in that portfolio next year?

Sure. I mean we could, I think we'll have to see how the macro trends, I think we'll have a better sense on our next earnings call in November of how it's playing out in a more normalized world. But a lot of our resorts also remember for DiamondRock, we repositioned several of our resorts. So we would expect outsized growth in hotels, even like Margaritaville and Vail, et cetera, that haven't really had a chance to get the full benefit of the repositions that we've done. So that may help our overall resort stats as well. But we have big macro trends go in the United States. I mean I believe that we are permanently at higher levels of leisure demand. I fundamentally believe as I stated that we're under resorted. But year-over-year comparisons, we'll have to see exactly how they play out, but we'll certainly benefit and should outperform how resorts do in the U.S. based on our repositionings.

Okay. Thanks. And Jeff, we've got less than six months left to go the balance the year you didn't give guidance. Some peers did. Some peers did not. I wondered if you had anything to add maybe on the FFO per share wide as we think about the year overall.

Yes. We -- obviously, we didn't give FFO per share guidance, but I think the building blocks are there, I guess. I won't do the math in public, but I would tell you that if you look in our press release where we provide this is just a good way to think about it. We provide in there the schedules for say comparable 2019 hotel adjusted EBITDA, which Mark in his comment said that we would in 2022 likely achieve that EBITDA. And if you back off that the cash interest expense number I gave of $51 million to $52 million, the G&A and the income tax expense, I think that's a good way of sort of backing into an FFO number.

And our next question comes from the line of Chris Darling with Green Street. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good afternoon. It looks like 2Q operating expenses for the comparable portfolio were about 4% higher than in 2Q 2019, despite occupancy still being about 9% lower. So a couple of questions. First, just hoping you can drill into some of the different expense buckets and give us a sense of where things stand relative to 2019. And then it also would be helpful to understand how some of those buckets might move as occupancy continues to grow?

Sure. Happy to try to delve into that. So some mix is a big shift on what goes on with margin. So urban came on more, it was more in occupancy. And I would say the other big thing to look at in the portfolio. We talked about some of the individual expense categories, but on mix is that our restaurants are at record levels and restaurants generally run 25% margin, banquets still well below where it was in 2019 and that probably runs a 50% margin. So when you kind of think about the mix on particularly the F&B side with little less group and less banquet, which is highly profitable, it's going to make the expense numbers look a little different quarter-to-quarter, depending on what's stronger in the mix in that quarter. In individual categories, if you look at kind of wages, they're up mid-single-digits. If you look at food cost like we're doing more restaurants, they're up kind of 15% to 19% again because it's more restaurant, but we're seeing some costs there. Overall, for the year kind of try to normalize the quarters we think our total expense growth will be 3%, 3.5%, which I think is a pretty terrific result and really testament to what our asset management are doing in cooperation with our operators. So that's a -- yes, I think you're going to be pleased on how the total expense growth is for the full-year.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Duane Pfennigwerth with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Maybe a longer-term one for Mark. You alluded a couple times on the call about structurally higher a leisure spend. Could you just expand on that? How are you thinking about kind of changing leisure travel patterns longer-term?

Sure. It's -- well, I think that the things that we're focused on just as what is secular trends is shoulder seasons are no longer shoulder seasons. Vail in September, which used to be empty and almost closed the hotel and now can run 70%. So you're seeing those Destin Beach in Florida, what used to be shoulder seasons now we're still -- they're actually prime seasons in many ways. So we're seeing elongation of the period at the, what I call core resort markets. And then within the urban but desirable markets and this is one of the reasons we're skewing more and more to lifestyle, even in the urban markets is I think people want to stay at industry places and they have flexibility. So instead of arriving Monday, maybe they come in Saturday instead of leaving, maybe they stay an extra day and maybe their partner can come in and work remote for why they're there and stay over for the weekend. People just have a lot more options. And we think that that blended travel is important. And actually, as we're looking even at our urban hotels, how do we appeal to that customer? And do we need to change our offering slightly? And do we need to kind of pitch our hotels a little differently. And frankly, should we skew more and more towards experiential and lifestyle because that's going to capture more of that secular trend in incremental leisure. And then going back on a more macro basis on leisure, if you kind of think about the big numbers and that this is kind of our internal conversations, but there's 83 million families in the United States. Fair half of those are people that travel to hotels like ours. Incremental if you kind of think about how the world's different today, there's probably one incremental night per family, that they can be on the road, work remote, like arrive a day early, stay an extra day. So that's 41 million incremental rooms jammed into what is a -- what resorts 12% of the total stock. So it's a lot of incremental nights that have been kind of permanently increased into the funnel. And resorts are hard to build. I mean there's a lot of the markets we're in, they'll never be another hotel built. So we think that that's a really good place to be. So we're trying to both on the resort side, shoulder seasons and core resort markets we think are much longer. And then within the urban markets, I think you need to think about how you appeal to be leisure traveler and have those hotels that are going to capture that trend line to outperform going forward.

Thank you. And our last question comes from the line of Floris van Dijkum with Compass Point. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks guys. Just curious, Mark, you touched upon your urban exposure and how you might change that over time. If I look at your largest EBITDA contributors in the past quarter, it was the Marriott magnificent mile in Chicago. It was the Western Boston. It was the Western Fort Lauderdale. It was The Gwen the branded, they don't necessarily fit what you've been trying to although The Gwen is a soft brand, I guess that's maybe not quite like the other ones. But as you're thinking about pivoting, those theoretically could be candidates for sale, but yet, the Fort Lauderdale Westin is right next to your Kimpton. It's not a necessarily urban market. How do you think about Fort Lauderdale as a -- is that an urban market or is that a resort market? And would you consider deploying some of the proceeds of any potential asset sale into more exposure into markets like Miami or Fort Lauderdale or San Diego those kinds that are sort of both urban as well as resorts?

Well, there's a lot there for us. So yes, I would say, talking about a couple of those hotels to kind of provide some distinction. The Gwen is exactly on strategy. So in a market like Chicago, where New York we want to have we like that, that luxury collection hotel, that hotel is really doing terrific. If you're a consultant, a premium consultant that is the hotel and the Marriott system you want to be in, in the city of Chicago. So I think that's exactly testament to the success in the trend lines that are going on there. A hotel like the Westin Fort Lauderdale, which I believe you've been to, but we have Pablo Salas. We have a restaurant there that will probably do $16 million in revenues this year. So what we try to do is even in those kind of we'll call hard brand resorts is create a differentiate experience. And I think that's number one. The Tinto's restaurants number one on TripAdvisor. And I think we're always top three on the Lona the evening restaurant. So we try to create a differentiated experience that people really enjoy and do things special things around the pool and the beach experience that really make it a unique resort experience. So those are kind of things that we'll continue to do. The big, Chicago Marriott is probably an outlier for our strategy in our portfolio. It's a very successful hotel. It's probably the best located big box in the city of Chicago with I think the best brand you'd want on a big box in the city of Chicago. But it doesn't mean it necessarily fits with our long-term strategy, but it's an asset that we think will be very successful, but we'll think about as we kind of monetize assets, I do think markets like San Diego, Miami, Austin, those kind of markets that are seven to eight week markets and have a lot of characteristics where they can have leisure and probably will be more beneficiaries of the BT leisure trends. I think those are higher on our interest level skill.

Thank you. And this does conclude our question-and-answer session. And I would like to turn the conference back over to Mark Brugger for any further remarks.

Thank you to everyone on the call. We appreciate your interest in DiamondRock, and we look forward to updating you next quarter. Good day.

This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.