Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Second Quarter 2012 HCP Earnings Conference Call. My name is Bonnie and I will be your coordinator today. [Operator Instructions] Now I would like to turn the presentation over to your host for today's conference call, John Lu, Senior Vice President. You may go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Bonnie. Good afternoon and good morning. Some of the statements made during today's conference call will contain forward-looking statements, including the statements about our guidance. These statements are made as of today's date and reflect the company's good faith beliefs and best judgment based upon currently available information. The statements are subject to the risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are described from time to time in the company's press releases and SEC filings. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. Some of these statements may include projections of financial measures that may not be updated until the next earnings announcement or at all. Events prior to the company's next earnings announcement could render the forward-looking statements untrue, and the company expressly disclaims any obligation to update earlier statements as a result of new information. Additionally, certain non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed during the course of this call. We have provided reconciliations of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures, as well as certain related disclosures in our supplemental information package and earnings release, each of which has been furnished to the SEC today and is available on our website at www.hcpi.com. I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and CEO, Jay Flaherty.

Thank you, John. Welcome to our Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are HCP's Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer, Paul Gallagher; and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Tim Schoen. We are enjoying significant momentum, allowing us to increase our FFO, our FAD and our Same Property Performance 2012 guidance, realized a significant reduction in our cost of capital and announced $500 million of acquisitions and an additional $100 million commitment. First, we'll begin with a review of the quarterly results we announced this morning. Tim?

Thank you, Jay. Today, I will cover 4 topics: second quarter results; investment transactions; financing activities and balance sheet; and finally updated 2012 guidance. Let me start with our second quarter results. Our same-property portfolio continued to perform well, generating a solid 3.1% cash NOI growth compared to the second quarter last year. The results were primarily driven by contractual rent increases and occupancy gains in our life science and medical office portfolios. Paul will review our operating performance by segment in a few minutes. For the second quarter, we reported FFO of $0.69 per share and FAD of $0.56 per share, which included a $7 million or $0.02 charge related to insurance recovery of past G&A expenses. On a year-over-year basis, FFO as adjusted decreased $0.08 per share and FAD decreased $0.06. The decrease resulted from one-time income totaling $41 million or $0.10 per share, primarily related to the gain from monetizing our Genesis debt investment in the second quarter of 2011. Excluding the one-time items from both periods, year-over-year, second quarter FFO as adjusted was flat, and FAD increased by $0.02 per share or 3.8%. Switching to investment transactions. Subsequent to the end of the first quarter, we announced $559 million of investments encompassing 4 different property types and 3 different investment products within our 5x5 business model. These transactions are immediately accretive to earnings and include: one, the GBP 137 million or $215 million debt investment in U.K.-based Four Seasons Health Care at a yield of 12.5% in late June; two, $274 million acquisitions of on-campus MOB portfolios that represent 1.2 million square feet in total and include a DownREIT component with equity units valued at $41 million, and the assumption of $59 million of mortgage debt at a blended rate of 5.7%. We expect to close…

Thank you, Tim. I'll review HCP's second quarter portfolio performance and highlight the $500 million of acquisitions announced since the end of the first quarter. Senior housing. Occupancy in our same-property senior housing platform was 85.9%, a 10-basis point sequential increase over the prior quarter and flat versus the prior year. Same-store cash flow coverage for the portfolio declined 1 basis point to 1.13x, driven by outsized fixed rent bumps on our transitioned assets and higher property expenses in our Brookdale portfolio. Current quarter year-over-year same-property cash NOI was up 2.1%. Growth was driven by rent steps, including higher rents for assets transitioned to new operators, offset by a one-time collection of additional rent in the prior period of 2 Sunrise portfolios. Net of this item, NOI increased 3.7%. The calculation of occupancy in our RIDEA portfolio has been changed to be consistent with Brookdale's methodology of utilizing a unit occupancy calculation. The resulting occupancy for the quarter is 86.5%, a 40-basis point decrease from the previous quarter, utilizing the new methodology. Recently, we have seen an improvement in move-ins as Brookdale has implemented several new programs, including personalized living and therapy services. In addition, we are upgrading the dining services in 5 of our Houston assets. Post-acute/skilled nursing. Coverages in our post-acute/skilled nursing portfolio metrics now reflect 2 quarters of lower reimbursement rates under RUGs-IV. HCR's fixed charge coverage ratio was 1.44x, a 9-basis point decrease for the trailing 12-month period ending March 31, 2012. For the trailing 12 months ending June 30, 2012, the fixed charge coverage was 1.29x, which includes an increase in reserves for general and professional liability claims for the years 2006 through 2010. Excluding this charge, the fixed charge coverage would be 1.39x. Cash flow coverage in our legacy same-store SNF portfolio was 1.58x,…

Thanks, Paul. I want to highlight a less well known but critically important component of HCP's real estate portfolio: standalone memory care facilities. HCP owns over 7,000 memory care units, representing 20% of our total senior housing footprint. Included in this total, HCP owns 58 standalone memory care buildings or roughly half of our total memory care units, making HCP one of the largest owners of standalone memory care facilities in the United States. The majority of HCP's standalone memory care facilities were acquired as part of our HCR acquisition, where 20% of the properties from the $6.1 billion transaction are in the senior housing sector. HCR's Arden Court portfolio represents purpose-built facilities developed by HCR in the late 1990s. These properties are often co-located on campuses with HCR's post-acute and skilled nursing facilities and specialize in memory care, dementia and early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's disease research reports that roughly 5.4 million Americans of all ages had Alzheimer's disease in 2012. And by 2050, more than 15 million Americans could be living with the disease, a key reason memory care residents are predicted to double over the next 30 years. The increasing incidence of memory care issues among our nation's aging senior population and HCR's premier national reputation for caring for residents with memory impairment are an attractive feature of our HCR transaction. As Tim described, we enjoyed an active period of capital markets activity. If you look at the first 7 months of 2012, HCP has achieved a remarkable reduction in its cost of capital, an improvement in all of its credit metrics. In January, we issued $450 million of 3.75%, 7-year debt. In March, we repriced our $1.5 billion line of credit on attractive terms and raised $359 million of equity to fund the redemption of our outstanding…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Paul Morgan of Morgan Stanley.

Jay, if you could talk a little bit about, now that you've had a little time with the Four Seasons investment, kind of your view on the U.K. senior housing market. And then just whether you see this as opening up other opportunities in Europe and whether that might be on the debt and equity or equity side.

Yes, sure. No, I understand the thought process and the speculation and even the intrigue of our Four Seasons investment in terms of what that might portend for the company's strategy offshore in Europe, elsewhere. The reality is, it's something much more straightforward. We use our 5x5 business model to source proprietary opportunities that produce negotiated transactions, that result in very attractive risk reward outcomes for our shareholders. And when you cut through it, quite frankly, that's really what was going on here. This was equity light return for debt risk exposure. I would like in this transaction -- we always, when we move away from 100% fee simple real estate transactions, we always look for optionality for those investments to eventually move to 100% fee simple real estate. Realistically, I liken this transaction to the HCA toggle note transaction we made back at the end of '06 where we had the best-in-class operator in the market, in that case HCA, in this case Four Seasons, at an attractive yield but with a very, very substantial equity base below us, 40%. In the case of this acquisition transaction is the Terra Firma equity investment below us, much like the HCA equity investment from the Frist family, Bain, KKR and Merelith Time. So while I think there could be some optionality for us to end up in the real estate, my guess is, with that amount of equity below us, you're looking at either a par plus a premium pay-off. Or potentially as we watch REITs evolve in terms of their acceptance in the U.K. market, there's a potential for that to unfold as well. But this is just a very attractive investment for our shareholders, and the icing on the cake was the execution of the 1.81% 4-year term debt. If you look at the -- not that we project finance our investments but if you look at the 12.5% less the 1.81%, you're at a spread there of almost 1,100 basis points, which is very, very attractive for our shareholders.

I shouldn't read too much into this in terms of initiative abroad. I should try to think of this more of a sort of opportunistic deal in isolation. It could be replicated but, not it's not part of a grand plan?

I think that's fair source by our 5x5 model. And again, we like to stay away from auction situations where highest price wins. So this was a very attractive result for our shareholders.

My other question, just on you, made a lot of mention of the cost of capital, which is very impressive these days. How do you think about underwriting, acquisition IRRs given your cost of capital. I mean, are you willing to drop IRRs on new deals? And does it make you more inclined to be acquisitive given changes in your cost of capital over the past 6 months?

No, absolutely not. I mean, if anything, you're seeing some backing up of cap rates at least in terms of the deal flow in the transactions that we've announced, which means the spread and the relative profitability of those investments is increasing to the betterment of our shareholders' return. I think it's actually fascinating. If you take a look at the Four Seasons investment and then go back almost 3 years to the day when we announced the second of our HCR ManorCare investments, so that was back on August 3 of '09. This is -- you got to write this down. It's kind of interesting. So the yield there, if you carve out the benefit that accrued to HCP from the seller financing on the second HCR debt investment, the yield was 9.8%. And that was done at a time that the 10-year treasury was 3.64% and our stock price was approximately $26 a share, okay? So 3 years ago, 9.8% yield on a debt investment, 3.64% 10-year treasury and a $26 HCP stock price. At the time we announced the Four Seasons deal, which was about a month ago, the yield there, with the discount that Paul referenced, is 12.5%, the 10-year was about 1.5% and our stock price at the time was $44 a share. So you can see that the differential, it's kind of upside down when you think about it. The yield has widened out by almost 300 basis points, and our cost of capital has come in by almost a similar amount. So I find that very interesting, and that's why we're in such an attractive position right now, and that's why we've got the liquidity that we've built into the balance sheet, both in terms of the 100% availability on our line plus the existing cash balances? Paul.

Our next question comes from Rich Anderson of BMO Capital Markets.

Jay, I was looking back in time and post-acute over the past, call it, 2.5 years has gone from 15% of your portfolio to 32%, if I'm doing the right analysis. And that's kind of a dead heat with your senior housing exposure to the overall portfolio. I'm curious, is this a grand plan, as Paul Morgan used that term for the U.K. investment, do you see the balance of post-acute versus senior housing as being attractive? Or again, is this just an opportunistic things that has come across your plate and that there's not a whole grand scheme involved in that change in your exposure to post-acute?

Well, I think the grand scheme is kind of a model, the business model that we created several years ago, which has been -- which we've got -- it's been replicated, I guess to a certain extent, in terms of our interest in widening out the property types that we're investing in. We now are a major investor in 5 property types, but also the different levels of the capital stack, if you will, where we apply those investments. I think the nuance to HCP is probably twofold: One, we tend to use that model to source proprietary opportunities that result in negotiated transactions; and then secondly, the organic growth that we've been able to generate because of those -- the outcomes of those negotiated transactions is quite substantial. I don't think we've had a quarterly conference call in the last 3 years where we haven't raised the existing guidance on the performance of our same-property portfolio and you saw that continue again. So if there's any grand scheme, that's the grand scheme. We feel that we've got a very, very attractive business model, which we've attempted to build barriers around. With respect to post-acute, again, I don't think you'd be at 15 -- your starting off point, Rich, if you thought about that in terms of just the real estate investment. I think you're probably putting the debt investment in Genesis at the time, in HCR at the time. So again, we see a tremendous opportunity here in the next couple of years in terms of the reforming of health care, which will not be driven by Washington D.C., it will be driven by the market. And when you do that, again, I think you've heard us say that our 3 top criteria are aligning ourselves with operators that have quality outcomes, that have efficient operations, read that to mean margin, they make money and have a critical mass, read that to be market share. And we feel that HCR is, as we feel about HCA and Hospital Land and Genentech and Amgen and Life Science and HCA to a very real sense in medical office buildings, are the partners we want to align ourselves with. So the HCR, if anything, would've driven the opportunity in post-acute for us. Had that not been HCR, I don't think you would've seen us today with the exposure we have. So that's how I'd respond to that question, Rich.

Would you have made the same deal as substantial as it was had you known about the cuts that were coming? How much did that -- has that kind of taken you a step back in terms of the quality of that investment, understanding it's a quality of the operator and all of the rest? How much of that sobered the view of the investment?

Well, I think it's done just the opposite. I think it's increased the attractiveness of the investment just because of now the consolidation play, which we anticipated would be back-end loaded to the second half of the decade. I think we're looking at that here and now with HCR. So that's made that investment and our alignment there much more attractive than we would've envisioned at the time we made the investment.

And as one final question, can you walk through the economics of your direct investment in BKD stock? Where are the IRRs? Where do you expect them to go, that kind of thing?

That's just -- that's a relatively small investment that, at this point, we don't mark that to market.

It's down 30%. I'm just wondering how that plays into anything?

I think we'll make me very, very good money for our shareholders on that investment.

Our next question comes from Derek Bower of UBS.

It's Ross Nussbaum here with Derek. Jay, you referenced quite a number of times your decline in your cost of capital. How has that influenced, if at all, how you're approaching putting capital out to work? Do you feel that this might be short-lived and there's a short duration and you should take advantage of it? Or do you say, "You know what, I'm just going to remain patient."

Well, I don't think this is a short-lived duration. I mean, if you look at the macro issues, you've got an economic recovery that at best is muted. That would be at best. You've got an unemployment situation that is challenged. I don't think that's going to change anytime soon. I think you've got a housing recovery that is tepid. I don't think that's going to change anytime soon. I think you've got an interest rate environment courtesy of the Fed that is likely to remain benign for the foreseeable future. And I think when you put all those things together, I think 2 things: One, those are big issues that are certainly not short term in nature, and I think it will drive investor demand, whether it be the retail investor, whether it be pension fund investors or the dedicated REIT investors. The combination of attractive yields that grow over time, in our case, they've grown for 27 consecutive years, with a very, very strong balance sheet, with ever accelerating Same Property Performance growth organically and some optionality on accretive external acquisitions. I don't think those dynamics are going to change anytime soon. So I would expect that, in part because of the opportunity set that we have in front of us, and in part because of investors -- I think David Rosenberg yesterday authored a piece calling for the end of equity ownership on the part of investors globally with an eye towards more of an income orientation. So I think these are big macro trends that are moving funds flow, Ross, and I don't think these things are going to reverse for the foreseeable future. That said, we consistently look to source very accretive transactions, that's been our hallmark. I think you see the results of that most immediately in the performance of our Same Property Performance results, but increasingly, I think you'll see us add to that staple of organic growth with external acquisitions.

Okay. A different topic. On Page 10 of your supplemental, it focuses in on what you have on the development side of the business, which is something that doesn't get as much attention. You've got $225 million of redevelopments and then there's another bucket of $390 million of land, and I think there's some activity going on there. Can you just walk us through on each of those buckets, what's the expected yield on the redevelopment? And what should we be thinking about relative to that $390 million investment on those land parcels?

Yes, let me just say, we actually -- I would take an exception, I think we've talked a fair amount about group development. We've obviously had an enormous success up in our Mountain View campus with the LinkedIn development, the build to suit there. We've got, which we've continued to talk about in the last couple of quarterly earnings calls, a very successful senior housing development program. I think we're up to 6 communities now. And then we've got the redevelopment opportunities and the development opportunities to land. I've spoken in previous calls about the ability to take the 6% of our overall portfolio that is not stabilized. So in other words, if you take a look at our portfolio, you've got 94% of that portfolio is kicking out 8-plus percent current yields. 6% of the portfolio, which is just under $1 billion when you do the math, is probably generating the plus or minus 3%. And I've spoken before about the opportunity, if we can move some or all of that unstabilized, call it $1 billion of investments, up closer to what the remainder of the portfolio is producing, is a very, very attractive incremental cash flow with not a whole lot of incremental CapEx associated with it. So that's how I would frame the overall perspective to your question. But let me have Paul kind of dig into the buckets, as you referred to them, that are on Page 10 of our supplemental.

Yes, if you look at -- on the pure development, that's our LinkedIn property, that's 100% leased. If you look at the overall redevelopment sector right now, that's tracking at about 45% occupancy across the board, looking at all those assets and incremental return on cost range anywhere from probably 7.5% to kind of mid-teens type returns, depending on the amount of work associated with that. And then with respect to the development land, once those things are developed, we'll probably be looking at probably somewhere in the 7.5% to 8.5% return on cost kind of range. I think Derek Bower has one question.

Just one quick one. I know RIDEA is still a small part of the portfolio, but we've seen some pretty positive industry trends so far in 2Q. So can you just discuss what drove that 40-bp decline in sequential occupancy and maybe remind us if there's any geographic concentration in that portfolio?

Again, just to set it up, this is the portfolio that we transitioned from Horizon Bay. So new operator, Brookdale versus Horizon Bay, and we perceived and we went out to the market an opportunity to invest some capital in this portfolio and change the profile in terms of a senior demand more from a pure-play independent living, which is why it was so important that we added, when we got down to the final selection process, Brookdale who had the ability to -- with capital, which we would provide pursuant to the joint venture there, the 90-10 joint venture, trick out those communities so that they could begin to have their ancillary revenue opportunity set. And we're well into that investment period at this point. We made an investment in the properties. Paul referenced the change that we're doing. We're adding the bistro concept down in our Houston portfolio of 5 former Horizon Bay communities. So I think Paul can take you through that. But this is a portfolio in transition. We feel better about this opportunity than we did at the time we made the investment. And Brookdale is working quite hard at transitioning this portfolio to where we all believe the upside is going to be for this portfolio.

Yes. I think if you look in the first quarter, there was probably a little bit more from the move-outs, both from a death and more broadly from an acuity standpoint. And that's one of the reasons why Brookdale has implemented the personal living and the therapy services to kind of help address some of those acuity issues.

And then there was no regional concentration mix or anything like that affecting it in the quarter?

Absolutely not.

No.

Our next question comes from Jeff Theiler of Green Street Advisor.

A question on HCR ManorCare. I knew that coverage would start a drop off as the RUGs continues to burn off, but it seems to be going a little bit faster than I would've thought at 1.44 we're kind of below the 1.5 coverage that was under it without any RUGs benefit. And I think we saw 6 months of the higher RUGs rates in that number. Can you talk about what's happening there and kind of what do you think the coverages will be by the end of the year after all those cuts have come through the system?

Well, I think Paul took you through not with 6 months to go but with 3 months to go what the coverage is, Jeff, in his script.

I'm sorry, I can go back and read it, but was it -- can you talk about it?

Adjusting out the prior year, the 2006 to 2010 GOPO adjustment, the coverage is 1.39, and that's through -- that's with 9 months of activity so you've got one quarter to go. So I think that's one important data point. You've also seen sequential month-over-month-over-month that the company outperformed the previous month so that's doing well. I think things are going along pretty well there. And Paul, I hope you'd add.

Yes. Just as a reminder, when you look at the portfolio, there's still significant cash flow after the payment of HCP's rent and CapEx, it's over $120 million so there's still quite a bit of cushion there.

Okay. And then I guess we got that market basket increase in skilled nursing rates last week. How are you feeling about that? Is that making you more comfortable with the rate environment? Or do you think this is a little pause as they see how the operators are adjusting to the bigger cuts that they put through last year? How are you thinking about rates going forward?

Well, I think that result was completely expected, so I don't think there was any news there. I think, as I've said previously, I think pause is an interesting word to use for the next, I guess, 12 to 18 months. But over the longer term, the country has a mismatch of entitlement commitments with funding. So I don't think anything is going to happen between now and the end of the year on that topic. But I think there's some reason to think that with the new Congress seated, maybe come March, you could see a couple of things that would be helpful for the country and helpful for health care costs in this country and indirectly helpful for the post-acute space. So I think -- but I think you're going to have to work and wrestle with this. I think, my guess is that corporate America will end up driving a lot of the change here given that some of these decisions are the type of decisions that our congressmen and congresswomen don't like to confront. So I think in a scenario where corporate America does for health care what it did for pension reform in the 90s, which is to move America to a defined contribution setup for health care coverage as opposed to a defined benefit, I think that's increasingly becoming likely, and I think in that scenario, low-cost provider wins. And in general, the skilled nursing post-acute space is absolutely in that bucket. And in particular, HCR ManorCare does an extraordinarily good job for a comparable senior that's got a variety of afflictions versus the alternative sites that, that senior might be treated in. So we feel very, very good, and I think these external shocks to the system will continue to drive M&A activity, and we think that the best highest quality, most efficient operators in that scenario are going to do very, very well.

Our next question comes from James Milam of Sandler O'Neill.

Jay, you talked a little bit about credit ratings and how you categorize your balance sheet as a weak A- credit. I'm just curious how conversations with the rating agencies are going if you're having any and when you think they might get on board with that view.

Well, I mean, those are confidential discussions so we would never comment on that. I think this isn't a discussion about the rating agencies. It's really a question of where our debt trades in the market. I think it's pretty straightforward. So I think we've been able to achieve in particular the last couple of debt transactions, which benefit obviously from the steps that Tim and Matt and others took earlier in the year on the balance sheet, we've been able to realize weak single A pricing on our debt security. So that's not really some speculation. That is what it is and those debts -- those bonds are very liquid, they trade every day. So that's specifically what I was referring to, James.

I understand that. I just -- there are some benefits to having higher ratings. I was just curious if that's a priority for you guys or not, I guess to push those higher with the agencies.

I think the priority is to have the strongest possible balance sheet. And increasingly, what you've seen Tim and Matt do is put a spotlight on how strong that balance sheet is on Pages 6 and 7 in our supplemental. And I think the markets are very efficient, and quite frankly, for the sell-side equity analyst on the call, don't take this the wrong way, but I've always been of a view that the fixed income investors have a little sharper pencils than the equity folks. And I think they've figure it out and I think they've attached an appropriate trade valuation for our debt securities. So where that shakes out for the agency, that's for them to discuss. I mean, those are institutions that have their own internal processes, and we very much respect them. But I think our balance sheet is our balance sheet, and those metrics are our metrics, and we've put them out there in the supplemental for any and all to view.

Okay, got it. I guess for the record, maybe I should shift to pen to pencil then as I'm taking notes?

Actually, James, the expanded credit metrics that we have in our supplemental have been in direct response to our fixed income investors request. So we continue to provide them as much as transparency as possible.

Got it, and that does help us too so we appreciate it. My second question, the operating portfolio, just curious, obviously, you gave us some color and answered some questions already. But was there anything that drove the expenses a little higher this quarter in particular that may burn off or is that kind of a going forward run rate at least the way things stand right now?

Yes. From that quarter-over-quarter, there was about $500,000 of expenses that should have been in the first quarter that really didn't get picked up until early in the second quarter.

Okay, got it. And then Jay, just my last one, on the last quarter's call, you sounded -- you had a fairly cautious tone regarding the macro environment. It doesn't sound like that's changed much but I'm just curious if you feel like there are any changes either with tax code or anything else that may drive greater opportunities for you guys as we go into year end or on the contrary maybe could be a potential risk for you.

Yes. Well actually, let's review the bidding because on the last call, I think I identified about half a dozen or so issues that I suggested were kind of acting to dampen transaction volumes, one was Europe. I don't think that's changed a whole lot since we last spoke, although we do believe and now you can see the results that from time to time, very attractive investment opportunities will present themselves, which is by the way, a sound bite for all these issues. We tend to migrate to where there's concern in issues because oftentimes, if your underwriting's solid, you can exploit those opportunities for the benefit of the shareholders. So Europe is still there, that hasn't changed a lot. Fiscal cliff is, I guess, 3 months closer to likely occurring. I don't think the economy or related to that unemployment have gotten a whole lot better in the past 3 or 4 months. I think housing, depending on which survey you look at, it seems to have bottomed but it's kind of bumping along the bottom. The election will obviously drive an awful lot of what I suggested could be -- manifest itself in a grand bargain, maybe as early as the first quarter of 2013 and you still have sequestration. So the one issue that's come off the table was the Supreme Court decision. And I think almost immediately, as I had predicted, you saw that as a catalyst for M&A activity. You saw your Wellpoint and AMERIGROUP's merger, you've seen Genesis and Son and my guess is you'll see others. So that's the 30,000-foot view, James, if I tried to answer that. That said, things are looking increasingly attractive for our ability to make accretive transactions, for some of the reasons that we've talked about and quite frankly some other reason. I think you'll see us in terms of announced transaction volumes. I think you'll see us build through 2012 and early 2013, which is about as far out as our forward pipeline goes, a sequential month -- quarter-over-quarter increases in announced transaction volume. So second quarter was up from the first quarter, third quarter is going to be up from the second quarter, and I suspect fourth quarter will be up from the third quarter. And I think the key word that I referenced on our call last time was that we had very high-quality dialogue across our 5x5 model. And if you look at the deals that we've just announced today, you've got 4 different property types: medical office, post-acute, life science and senior housing, and you've got 3 different product types: DownREITs, mezz debt and the real estate. So I think you're really seeing the benefit of our business model here sourcing very attractive opportunities. And again, no promises but my guess is you're going to continue to see acceleration on this front in the near term for HCP.

Our next question comes from Quentin Velleley of Citi.

Jay, just in terms of the $100 million of additional debt investment, can you just give us a little more flavor as to what that might be? What kind of yields it might be? What the underlying assets are likely to be and whether it's in the U.S. or offshore?

Yes. That's a commitment. That's one of the many pleasures as we've experienced the last 48 hours of having an earnings call on the last day of the month, which oftentimes, for accounting reasons and other reasons, is a good time to close transactions. So you'll see that be a debt investment, an attractive from an HCP shareholders standpoint, double-digit, high-yielding debt investment in post-acute/skilled space in the States would be how I'd handicap how that comes out.

Did you say in the U.S. or offshore?

I think I said in the U.S.

Okay. And then just in terms of The Boyer Company now managing a chunk of your medical office building, they've been an active developer. Is there anything else in their development pipeline that might be an opportunity for you guys in the future?

Yes, let me just -- I mean, this is -- I want to say this is the ninth or tenth transaction we've done with that family going back, I think, about a decade at this point. And you mentioned medical office, Quentin, but they've also -- they developed and manage our entire life science portfolio which doesn't get the credit that our Bay Area and San Diego life science portfolios get. But they manage -- they developed and managed the life science portfolio that we have in the Salt Lake City, Utah area. So we've been -- that's a long-standing, a very good relationship. We like the alignment that the DownREIT structure brings us. They've been very, very good partners, and they've got a very fine organization. And as you might imagine with a very fine organization, they continue to develop high-quality opportunities, and hopefully we'll continue to maintain that relationship going forward.

Jay, it's Michael Bilerman speaking. Just a question in terms of making sure I got the pipeline down correctly. You talked in your opening comments about having a significant pipeline as of the last call across the 5x5 model and you said it accelerated further. You talked about all the deals that has come about more recently. Are we -- I guess is the pipeline post those deals bigger than it was relative to the last quarter? Or did you effectively just close some of those significant transactions?

Yes, Michael. I think you misquoted me. I never used the word pipeline on our last call. I talked about significant dialogue across our 5x5 model. I think you've seen some of the results of that significant dialogue that we've talked about today. I suspect, as I've just indicated in response to a prior question, you'll continue to see results of that significant dialogue, but I've never talked about nor quantified the pipeline.

Right Maybe I've confused dialogue with pipeline. I guess from a capital perspective, obviously, you took advantage of the markets being able to equitize and have capacity to do transactions. And clearly with the cash balance you have on the balance sheet post the term loan, as well as an untapped line. You certainly have a lot of capacity to do transactions. I guess how much would you fill up in real estate and loans prior to injecting more equity in? And how should we think about, just from a debt perspective, is it $1 billion of real estate loans that you effectively from this point forward can fund before feeling the need that you want to put more equity on the balance sheet?

Again, we don't -- everything we do from a balance sheet standpoint is with an eye towards our long-term target leverage ratio, which to review is 40 parts debt, 60 parts equity. So seeing what we saw in the dialogue that we had off of our 5x5 model earlier this year, we obviously were very proactive in taking out some high coupon debt, some high coupon preferreds and with equity. And then now you're starting to see us build back or slightly below that 40-60 today, build back at 3.15% coupon for 10 years, 1.81% coupon for 4 years starting to see us extract value from those balance sheet maneuvers we do -- we did earlier this year. But we don't -- anything we would do would be in the context of 40-60 debt-to-equity, long-term target ratio, Michael.

And how about just from a debt-to-EBITDA perspective?

Well, I think that kind of falls out much like the fixed charge coverage ratio. You're starting to see very, very -- which is why really I guess for the third or fourth time, I'd encourage folks to look at Pages 6 and 7 of our supplemental. But take a look at the debt-to-EBITDA and take a look at the fixed charge coverage ratios and which I think is more representative. Take a look at them on a run rate of just the current quarter and you can begin to see why the fixed income investors have become begun to kind of recalibrate, if you will, the valuations for our fixed income securities.

Right. And then as you talked about next year's $900 million of debt rolling between the $550 million of bonds and another $370 million of mortgage debt, how quickly, just given the rate environment today and where spreads are and how attractive the recent financings for you have been, would you prefund any of that? Is any of that earlier '13 versus later '13? Would you sort of warehouse capital, more capital today for that?

No, I think and again, just to calibrate this, so you're seeing what's going on with our same-property performance. You've heard us talk about -- it used to be 3.5% but now you can see it's 4% same-property performance levered 40-60 gets you the 6.5% FAD per share with growth, with no external acquisitions. If you then layer in, pick an improvement in terms of that 5.9% on that debt that you just referenced that matures next year, I don't know if it's 300 basis points or 200 basis points or something in the middle. But you do the math on that, you layer that into what we've already got kind of contractual with the FAD growth, you can start -- you continue to grow the dividend, reduce the payout ratio and be clipping coupons here until the cows come home. So I think that's going to be there for us. And again, I don't think, to Ross's earlier question, I don't think this is some momentary drop in cost of capital. I think the macro trends that have brought all this together are going to stay with us for a while. Barclays just last week made a call on the 10-year, touching 1.2% before the end of the year. So if you look at the maturities, Michael, on that debt that you referenced, most of that is back-end loaded. And I suspect given the other opportunities we have, most notably the accretive deal dialogue we've got going on, my guess is we'll deploy our capital to take advantage of those and then wait for the maturing debt opportunities, which are back-end loaded in '13 to present themselves, much like we did earlier this year with the debt issuance, the debt retirements we made.

Our next question comes from Nick Yulico of Macquarie.

Just had a quick one on HCR ManorCare on the OpCo investment. How does that actually -- how does the accounting work for that in that -- I mean, it seems like you guys are booking some income. It seems like the investment was marked up in the quarter, and so I'm just trying to understand what are the drivers of that on the income statement and balance sheet?

I think the way we account for that is in the equity method for the investment. And it causes a recharacterization of part of our rent that we get from the leases because we have a 10% interest in the OpCo so.

Okay. So I mean it's only a slight-pick up but it did -- the investment did get -- the value of that did go up in the quarter. Does that somehow mean that in the quarter there was actual income that you guys were sort of booking from that investment?

Yes, yes, we have continual income from that investment and there haven't been distributions, so.

But we haven't marked up.

We don't mark up the investment methods. We carry that our basis, and then as the investment makes -- as OpCo makes money, the investment increases.

Right, okay. So to the extent that the investment balance is increasing in a quarter, it means that you're actually collecting income, you're not changing the way you're accounting for the investment on the balance sheet?

Yes, it's not a mark-to-market method like you would think it was with a security like stock. I think that's where you're going.

Okay. And then just wanted a quick question on the hospitals. Jay, just interested to hear your opinion on whether you think some of the consolidation of operators there is going to create some more real estate opportunities, investment opportunities over the next year?

Absolutely, just like you're going to see operator consolidation in hospitals, you'll see operator consolidation in post-acute skilled. You'll see operator consolidation quite possibly in senior housing. So that's the next -- we're moving into the maturing of the health care services sector in the country. And when that happens, you get all sorts of consolidation and we feel we are very well positioned, in large part because of the quality of the operating partners we have in our portfolio, and they're in turn likelihood that they will be the consolidators as opposed to the consolidatees to do well in this next period of -- what we expect will be very, very active transaction volumes.

Our next question comes from Rob Mains of Stifel, Nicolaus.

Not a whole lot left. A couple of boring numbers questions. First, Paul, to beat the RIDEA thing to death. You explained that you're doing some repositioning. There's also some expense migration between the 2 quarters. If I do that and I still see a little bit of a drop in NOI, that would be explained by the repositioning that you're doing primarily?

Yes.

Okay. And then, Tim, the $7 million GOPO reserve, was that addition to reserve or a released prior-period reserves?

No, that was -- that -- on our insurance recovery, the $7 million insurance recovery, that's actually a recovery, but not a charge. I misspoke. It's a $0.02 insurance recovery. I should know you'd catch that, Rob.

Okay. So the way I should look at that is that without that G&A, would have been $21.5 million or whatever?

You're right. That would be, our G&A run rate is $20 million is a good run rate, $19 million to $20 million during the quarter.

Fair enough. And then last question on the MOB transactions, this is an asset class that you've been pretty quiet in for a while. And it seems that you're getting some pretty attractive cap rates on that. Should I look at this as being kind of one-off deals or are there -- do you sense kind of a loosening of that market where we've been seeing a lot of stuff from the 6s?

Rob, I think we like to talk about the deals that we do, and so we think that those are really -- I mean, those are, with the exception of quite possibly the Medcap deal with HCA back in '03, which augured the arrival of Mr. Gallagher to the company, those are the 2 highest quality MOB portfolios. In terms of age, I think that Boyer portfolio's average age is 8 years old and then you got a lot of, not just on campus but big boy and big girl hospital systems, leading market share systems. And Scottsdale medical, Paul and I have spent an awful lot of time over there in the last couple of months with Tom Klaritch and our MOB colleagues and that's just a wonderful portfolio. So I think these are -- we're probably more excited than that probably. We are more excited about the quality of that real estate and the quality of those hospital systems than we are the economics and, by the way, the economics are pretty darn good.

Okay. But I shouldn't read into this as there is -- suddenly, you're seeing a lot of similar quality type opportunities out there. You've been -- We've always been waiting for the MOB assets to kind of get shaken loose, but I assume that this isn't a harbinger necessarily.

I guess time will tell. We've got, as I said, I don't know if I mentioned to you before but we've got a very active dialogue across our 5x5 model, and the MOB property type is absolutely represented in that dialogue.

Our next question comes from Tayo Okusanya of Jefferies.

Jay, a quick question. You guys have a lot of really good stuff going on in regards to raising same-store NOI growth. You have all this accretive acquisitions that are hitting the numbers. You've got the $0.02 pickup from the insurance recovery. And I guess with all that suddenly in the pot, I'm just a little bit surprised that guidance didn't come up more. Is there something I'm missing on the negative side that's offsetting some of that stuff?

No. I mean, I think if you take a look at our portfolio, the vast majority of it is contractual. So while we love the fact that we're exceeding our budgets and you're seeing that manifest itself in consecutive quarter-over-quarter increases in Same Property Performance, we don't have a lot of the portfolio exposed to variability. So I think that's one thing. I think we've got very attractive organic growth rate, and we've got the ability to supplement that with accretive external acquisitions. But I don't know, Tim, if you want to add anything?

Yes, Tayo, obviously, we have partial year on those acquisitions. That's part of it, as well as the fact that we did end up raising capital very attractive rates and on very attractive terms in advance of these acquisitions, so that's some of it. Obviously, I did mention several small items that went the other way for $0.01. So I think that probably covers it for you.

Okay, that's helpful. And then just again, I know that RIDEA thing and we'd kind of talked about that a little bit. But again, the repositioning that's happening, was that primarily in the assisted living side because that's where you saw the biggest drop in occupancy.

Well, no. I mean, the business opportunity set that Brookdale and ourselves identified was one of largely an independent living portfolio. And to bring that into the Brookdale family with their ancillary revenue capabilities and to take advantage of our attractive cost of capital and reposition that portfolio. So that's -- Paul will expand on that here, but that's the opportunity [indiscernible].

Yes, Tayo, on that assisted living piece, that's 3 assets. And when you take into account Brookdale's new methodology, what we had in the first quarter supplemental, the 91.6% occupancy, would come down to 82.8%, and that's primarily because there's a lot of memory care in there and double occupancy. And based on the way they're accounting it, it has an impact. Now if you look at where it's actually coming in at, it's up 70 basis points this particular quarter versus the first quarter, utilizing the new methodology. And that's just more occupancy methodology doesn't have anything to do with impacting income or anything of that nature.

Yes, okay. So if I just take a look at the total for the RIDEA assets, the total occupancy in 1Q '12 under the new methodology, what would that number be versus the 86.5% for this quarter?

For which assets?

For the RIDEA portfolio?

I think I said 86.9% in the transcripts, apples-to-apples, Tayo.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Todd Stender of Wells Fargo.

How do you feel about how much you've allocated so far to the Four Seasons deal? Are there other opportunities within the capital stack that you'd either take advantage of just to insulate your current investment or potentially just get a bigger seat at the table on an eventual outcome?

Yes, good question, Todd. Well first off, it was very important from -- for that very question that we'd be at least 75% of that senior unsecured tranche Todd, which is where we are actually but over that. We fought long and hard about a larger play there that might have morphed into a larger investment but would've taken us into the more senior spot in the capital stack. And we've evaluated that risk return, but at that point of the capital stack, it's much less about risk and much more about return and felt we negotiated a good outcome for our shareholders with sticking at the unsecured. But those are decisions and those are layers of the capital stack that Paul and his team are well traveled in, both from an HCA standpoint, from an HCR standpoint, from a Genesis standpoint. And a lot about the lessons and experiences that we took from those 3 prior transactions were on full display in this one. So I think the answer to -- I think bottom line is, it's 75% of that senior unsecured tranche, we feel very good about what that gets us. I think to have gone more senior would have been accretive but not nearly as accretive as what we've got. And if you look south of us, where you've got 40% of the acquisition value in equity, we feel very comfortable there. I think, and this is why I think it's hypothetical that this will end up resulting in us actually owning the real estate and thus there's a REIT play. But you might just remind, were we to end up -- were all that equity to hypothetically go away, what would the economics be that we would own that real estate, Paul?

The EBITDA yield to last dollar, if you will, was 18%.

Which is why we think it's highly unlikely we find ourselves in that scenario, but were we to find ourselves in that scenario, that, you could argue, would be an even more attractive outcome than the one we think we've struck with both the investment we made and in the corresponding 4-year debt placement to lock in that 1,100-basis point spread.

Okay, that's helpful. And just with regard to the 2 MOB portfolios that you've got under contract, how much do you think, if any, the Supreme Court ruling influence the sellers in bringing those to market?

Zero.

Okay. And then just to kind of finish up, Jay, you gave very good color in the memory care segment, the HCR ManorCare portfolio. What's the occupancy, would you say, in that stand-alone portfolio? It's probably one segment of the senior housing business that we hear most about where there's a pretty good imbalance between demand and supply. Is there anything that you can break out just to...

Yes, we're going to -- you should assume that, that's kind of mid-80s. There's -- because of the increasing incidence of that affliction, you're starting to see some significant ramping up of occupancy for that Arden Court portfolio and expansion of margins and things like that. We think this is a very attractive piece, albeit small, of the senior housing space. We think we've got a very meaningful amount of critical mass in the stand-alone piece. And over the course of the next 12 to 15 months, you may see us shine a little brighter light and potentially invest some additional capital into this space if the demand that we suspect is coming, in fact, turns out to be true.

I would now like to turn the call back to Jay Flaherty, Chairman and CEO.

Okay, everyone. Thank you for your time. Enjoy the rest of your summer. Stay cool. Go U.S. at the Olympics, and we'll see you in the fall. Take care.

Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.