Good morning, and welcome to the DLH Corporation Fiscal 2018 Third Quarter Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Chris Witty, Investor Relations advisor. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning everyone. On the call with me today is Zach Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kathryn Johnbull, Chief Financial Officer. The company's third quarter press release and PowerPoint presentation are available on our Web site under the Investor page. I would now like to provide a brief Safe Harbor statement, which is also shown on slide two of the presentation. This call may include forward-looking statements that relate to the company's outlook for fiscal 2018 and beyond. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from these statements. Please refer to the Risk Factors contained in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. On today's call, we will be referencing both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP results to our reported GAAP results is included in our earnings release and in the Investor Presentation on DLH's Web site. All comparisons throughout this call will be on a year-over-year basis unless otherwise stated. President and CEO, Zach Parker, will speak next, followed by CFO, Kathryn Johnbull, after which, we will open it up for questions. With that, I'd now like to turn the call over to Zach. Please go ahead, Zach.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning everyone. Welcome to our fiscal 2018 third quarter conference call. Starting with slide three, let me begin by providing a high level overview of our financial performance, and recent accomplishments. Revenue for the third quarter rose to $36.1 million, a recent high, up 23.5% over last year. Our growth this period was fueled by a surge in business activity across several key programs, including Head Start, which was somewhat of an anomaly, but reflected spending requirements as the government closes in on a fiscal year-end. A way of caution, we do not expect Q4 revenue to be at the same level. While we are winning new contracts with build out base and out business base over time, individual quarters can be lumpy from a top line perspective, due to characteristics of individual task orders and the overall timing of procurement activity. Our gross margin was 23.1% for the quarter, also a recent high, and we posted net income of $0.13 per share versus $0.08 a year ago. We also generated $4 million of cash from operations, and further reduced our leverage during the quarter, leaving us with just 14 million of senior debt, as Kathryn will review in a moment. Fiscal 2018 has been a great de-leveraging year as we generated $8 million in cash from operations thus far. Overall, we continue to show strong operating performance, growing the business, expanding margins, and generating solid financial results. Turning to slide four, I want to take a moment to speak to our expectations for fiscal 2019, which is right around the corner. Obviously, our observations are just that, thoughts and views based on how we see the industry and on trends that appear eminent. In this current environment, the future chain [ph] indeed would be…

Thank you, Zach, and good morning everyone. We are pleased to report another quarter of solid financial results. Turning to slide six, we posted revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2018, of $36.1 million, representing an increase of $6.9 million or 23.5% over the prior year third quarter. The higher revenue reflected high activity levels on certain key programs, as Zach mentioned, and expansion of services on existing contract vehicles. Such top line results represented strong performance for DLH that we again caution that revenue trends can be lumpy quarter-over-quarter, particularly at the end of the government fiscal year. Now, moving to gross profit on slide seven, this quarter the company posted total gross profit of approximately $8.3 million versus $6.4 million last year with the 30.6% increase due to both higher revenue and margin expansion. As a percent of sales, the third quarter gross margin was 23.1% versus 21.8% last year, generally reflecting program mix. As with revenue, gross margins can vary quarter-to-quarter due to the timing of activity levels across our many contracts. Turning to slide eight, income from operations rose to $2.6 million for fiscal year 2018 third quarter, or $1.8 million last year, as higher gross profit was partially offset by an increase in G&A expenses. The increase in G&A primarily reflects the impact of business development activities and certain non-cash equity grants. We reported net income for the three months ended June 30, 2018 of approximately $1.6 million, or $0.13 per diluted share versus net income of $0.9 million or $0.08 per share in the prior year period. DLH recorded $0.7 million tax provision for the current period versus $0.5 million in fiscal 2017, with effective tax rates benefiting in fiscal '18 from the prorated impacted of the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. Turning to slide nine, EBITDA for the three months ended June 30, 2019 was $3.2 million versus $2.3 million last year. EBITDA as a percent of revenue was 8.9% in the current quarter versus 7.7% in 2017. A reconciliation of GAAP net income to EBITDA is in our earnings statement. Turning to slide 10, you can see a snapshot of our balance sheet at the end of the quarter. We had approximately $6.6 million cash on hand versus $4.9 million at the beginning of the fiscal year. We had nothing borrowed under our revolving credit facility at the end of the quarter, and our term loan had a balance of $14 million. Our net debt to trailing EBITDA position now stands at just 0.72 times trailing 12 months EBITDA; testimony to our company's extraordinary ability to generate and manage cash, as Zach mentioned. That concludes my discussion of financial statements. And with that, I will turn the call back to the operator to open for questions.

Thank you [Operator Instructions] The first question will come from Ken Herbert with Canaccord. Please go ahead.

Good morning, Ken.

Good morning, Zach and Kathryn, good morning.

How are you?

Very good. Really nice quarter, I just wanted to see if you could provide any more specifics around timing in the fourth quarter, and it sounded a little bit like there may have been some business hold into the third quarter, but -- from the fourth quarter, but how should we think the strong revenue growth you saw in the third quarter and expectation specifically for the fourth quarter around the top line and then maybe you know, historically you have got a -- this past year, a very nice gross margin in the fourth quarter as you saw good volume there, but do we see a similar strength in the gross margin in the fourth quarter as well? Thank you.

Good afternoon, Ken. Good to chat with you, appreciate the question. We are still looking at a good strong Q4, and as we indicated there are several factors that will contribute to, you know, a little bit of variance, as we get through the quarter we do expect that the key drivers for the Head Start for the Q3 will not sustain through Q4, but we think that the top line will still be something very strong, certainly I think it will probably be north of what we had in Q2. Kathryn, you want to add any color to that?

Yes. Exactly right. I do think much of the search that we completed in Q3 will naturally not recur into Q4. Those have been growth and expansion on programs throughout Q3 that will help Q4. So I would want to place Q4 somewhere in between Q1 and Q2, not a strongest Q3, and just given the mix that revenue will drive from slightly more traditional gross margins, more in line with our 22, maybe slightly north of 22, is our current estimate.

Okay.

Yes.

Yes. Perfect. And Zach, I just wanted to follow-up on your comments around obviously fiscal '19, I know you had some timing risk around some of the re-competes, but certainly fundamentals and at least from a budget standpoint appear to be favorable and you have continued to I think put up certainly better top line numbers than I was expecting, which is very nice to see. Can you provide a little more detail on how you see maybe '19 shaping up and some of the key sort of puts and takes from a contract standpoint as we start to look to frame the next fiscal year?

Yes. No. I appreciate that, Ken. We think that -- given that there is some stability now at the decision-making level within a few of our key targeted programs, a fair amount of -- we think a fair amount of the opportunities that we've had pending for some time had been, we think are quite held up because of the lack of first budget, and then our decision-markers. And we have started to see more decision-markers being placed into some of these key organizations down to second and third levels in the agencies. We think we expect to see Q4 and early part of Q1 of '19 to really release some of these awards. As we indicated, we had a couple of small awards re-compete and a new business opportunity start to be on quote [ph]. So we are hopeful that some of that logjam will get deployed. But we on the other front, we really are seeing a pretty strong budget. There will not be a sequestration with respect of the prior years. We really expect to see some good movement on some of the awards. And we still remain optimistic that we will get our fair share. We've traditionally done very well with our re-competitions, and we are looking forward to continuing that trend as well.

Great. Thank you very much. And if I could just finally, you continue to make very good progress on de-leveraging; as we move forward here, should we change our thinking at all around leverage levels you are comfortable with or maybe any change in how we should think about capital allocation as you continue to obviously work on the debt and show up the balance sheet?

Sure. We are pretty consistent on how we're going to really deploy capital. I think any major investment of course as we talked about, Kathryn, is leading our corporate development initiatives and that would be where we would potentially look at using debt going forward on an acquisition. Upsize that, I think Kathryn, you can talk a little bit more specifically.

Yes, besides that, we continue to expect the operating needs of the business to be fairly light in terms of capital requirements. I mean naturally as the new programs come on, that will be a short-term consumption of cash, but right very, very quickly we expect the cash flow on normal operations to be strong and really as Zach said, protect our access to capital really for a special purpose, and most likely that would be an acquisition.

Great. Thank you very much. I'll pass it back there.

[Operator Instructions] The next question will be from Ben Klieve with Noble Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you. First, kind of backing off on Ken's questions here, you said the drivers of the Head Start program will continue into Q4, but given your reason at this point to believe that the really strong performance you've seen through the first three quarters this year won't be continuing into next year?

Well, more so what we were going through with Ken was just a bell curve on the quarters within any given fiscal year traditionally, and I could have been coupled to you on traditionally there, because clients have their reasons for why they may layout a particular program execution differently in any given period. But generally speaking, our peak periods are Q2 and Q3 because of the strength of the review cycle on that Head Start program in those periods. So that's why if you tend to look at our revenue layout, it's going to be strongest in Q2, Q3; Q1s are -- tends to be soft this quarter, and Q4 tends to be better than Q1, stronger than Q1, but doesn't have a lift from some of the search requirements that happen in Q2 and Q3. Now rolling forward to '19, as you said, we expect that similar layout as based on the data we know right now. We expect a similar layout of our programs in FY '19, but…

Perfect. Thank you.

But your bigger point, yes, generally the trend is positive from the current budget support and -- the applicable adjustable targets of the market.

Okay, perfect. Thanks, Kathryn. In terms of the pipeline, on the second quarter call, you described about $700 million of addressable leads and then this quarter described it being down quite a bit about $400 million. Can you talk about kind of how the pipeline has evolved this year and help us understand kind of how successful you've been in translating the pipeline in the bookings?

Sure. So the number we've given, just to clarify again that we are given today is really a new business only, and if you want to make sure it's clear, it does not include any of our re-competes in it. And from time-to-time, we specify -- we want to make sure we specify whether or not it does include re-competes. And probably the biggest driver was the decision we talked about once before, and one of our potentially -- substantially impact opportunities which we were not successful on is probably the biggest contributor, we had one relatively large on an annual basis, that decision has been made, and we believe that the protest activity has subsided. Aside from that, the addressable market has really expanded in some of our core areas. And we have, as Kathryn indicated, we have reinvested in some additional business development resources, because we see some opportunities in the FY '19 starting to really surge. So are we really starting to position ourselves for those as well.

Okay, perfect. And I apologize if I was comparing apples and oranges this year. So that $700 million in Q2 included re-compete in the $400 million that you talked about today did not include re-compete, is that correct?

Correct, as well as I like to say one other potential significant award of which the decision was made to go in other direction.

Right. Okay, perfect. And then, on the M&A front, I certainly understand and appreciate that we need to be patient and wait for the right deals, we are moving too quickly here, but I'm curious over the last few quarters you certainly had the bandwidth to make a move if you saw the right opportunity, are you any closer today than you have been over the last couple of calls? Have you had opportunities that progress, but after a while didn't meet the final criteria or have you just really not seen much even get up or down the negotiation path? What kind of -- what does the market really look like here over the last couple of quarters for you?

It actually has -- good question; and it actually has been a very healthy and a good market. We have actually done some very extensive reviews. We've been in very close discussions with some parties. And as best I can tell you at this stage, we remain very interested in an opportunity or two as well. So the market has been really good. And yes, it's not just lift management for us, we've actually gotten into some pretty deep IOI discussions and even further.

Okay. Very good, and thank you, guys. I think that's it from me. I'll jump back in queue.

You bet.

At this time, there are no other callers in the question queue. So I'll turn the conference back over to Zach Parker for any closing remarks.

Good. Well, thank for again your continued interest and support in DLH. Again, we are pleased with our Q3 performance, but we look even more forward to giving you our full fiscal year and Q4 results later in the year. So thank you again, and you all have a blessed day. Bye for now.

And thank you, sir. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.