Good morning and welcome to the DLH Holdings Fiscal 2018 First Quarter Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. [Operator Instructions]. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions]. Please note today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Chris Witty today's moderator. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning everyone. On the call with me today is Zach Parker, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Kathryn Johnbull, Chief Financial Officer. The Company's first quarter press release and PowerPoint presentation are available on our website under the Investor page. I would now like to provide a brief Safe Harbor statement which is also shown on Slide 2 of the presentation. This call may include forward-looking statements that relate to the company's outlook for fiscal 2018 and beyond. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from these statements. Please refer to the Risk Factors contained in the company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. On today's call, we will be referencing both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of our non-GAAP results to our reported GAAP results is included in our earnings release and in the Investor Presentation on DLH's website. All comparisons throughout this call will be on a year-over-year basis unless otherwise stated. As shown on Slide 3, President and CEO, Zach Parker, will speak first, followed by CFO, Kathryn Johnbull, after which we will open it up for questions. With that, I'd now like to turn the call over to Zach. Please go ahead, Zach.

Thank you, Chris, and good morning everyone. Welcome to our fiscal 2018 first quarter conference call. Starting with Slide number 4 let me begin by providing a high level overview of our recent performance, and some particular accomplishments. Revenue for the first quarter once again surpassed $30 million, and more importantly, rose nearly 16% over prior year comparable period. This organic growth not only underscores the value of our services and the stability of our contracts, but it is rather impressive given the ongoing budget stalemates in Washington that have led the Congress to adopt a string of continuing resolutions. In fact, most of our programs are fully funded with limited downside risk even during government shutdowns, a testimony to the enduring nature and the critical mission criticality to these agencies which include the Department of Veteran Affairs, HHS, and the Department of Defense. This aspect of our business, unlike some of our competitors, should reassure our investors during a time when there is no easy matter of trying to figure out the forecast when Congress will decide on a budget. Our gross margin was 21.6% for the quarter, down slightly from last year due to our program mix, but will still be within our target range. And our bottom line results were impacted by a one-time non-cash charge recorded due to the recently enacted Tax Act which Kathryn will review in greater detail in a moment. There remains a very busy time for DLH in terms of our bid & proposal activity, although some awards had been delayed due to the ongoing continuing resolution. We expect that once the budget priorities are finalized, the remainder of fiscal 2018 will be a period of higher than normal contract selection for government agencies. The current environment has particularly impacted the federal…

Thank you, Zach, and good morning everyone. We're pleased to report another quarter of sound financial results. Turning to Slide 7, we posted revenue for the three months ended December 31, 2017, of $30.2 million representing an increase of $4.1 million or 15.7% over the prior year's first quarter. The higher revenue was once again due to growth across our existing contract vehicles along with strategic new small program awards. This is the second consecutive quarter of revenue surpassing $30 million, as Zach mentioned. And although we expect to see some lumpiness quarter-to-quarter going forward due to tax quarter timing and program delivery schedules. However, we expect the second quarter to be a very positive one regardless of whether there is a government shutdown or a continuing resolution, due to the nature of our programs and our funded status. Now moving to gross profit on Slide 8. This quarter the company posted total gross profit of approximately $6.5 million versus $5.8 million last year, driven by the higher revenue. As a percent of sales, the first quarter gross margin was 21.6% down slightly from last year's 22.3% reflecting program mix and timing. We continue to focus on more complex, higher value contracts, as Zach discussed, while keeping the lid on expenses. Turning to Slide 9, income from operations rose to $1.1 million for the fiscal 2018 first quarter from $0.9 million last year, as higher gross profit was partially offset by an increase in D&A as well as G&A expenses. The increase in G&A primarily reflects the impact of certain non-cash equity grants. We reported a net loss for the three months ended December 31, 2017, of approximately $2.9 million or $0.24 per diluted share versus net income of $0.3 million or $0.03 per share in the prior year period.…

Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Today's first question comes from Ken Herbert of Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead.

Hello, this is Jamaine calling in for Ken. Just a couple of quick questions, you mentioned your contracts looking kind to focus on leveraging your IT and your kind of own company expertise. Just looking forward in terms of contracts or competition that you're looking at, I mean is there, could you give a percentage in terms of how many of those contracts are focused on leveraging your IT next sheets versus kind of simple contracts that you guys have been on in the past.

Yes, no I appreciate that. Good morning, Jamaine. How are you my friend?

Doing fine. Thank you.

And congratulations again to all the Eagle fans on the call. We had a good time with you guys as well. With regard to our new business pipeline, Jamaine, we've been really shaping that portfolio over the last six months to ensure that the majority of the deals are going to be those that where we can leverage IT and in particularly information and data analytics. Kathryn and I made a substantial investment commitment for this annual operating plan to upgrade our resources and capabilities in that arena, and our business development folks are doing a pretty good job of making sure we're shaping the new business pipeline to that regard. I would without pipeline in front of me; I would estimate that we're approximately 50% of our pipeline today is heavily leveraged around technology solutions. So we're really getting there and this of course was driven largely by the shot in the arm that we have with the acquisition in mid-2016.

Okay, thank you. First half of 2018, what would you just -- how much of the contracts in this year are due up for renewal in the first half of the year?

Well, all of what I was describing for you is new business.

Okay.

Bring to that. So we're -- and I'd say that the work that is up for renewal near-term is that work which is really not leveraging a high amount of analytics and technology to drive the higher margins.

Okay. And then, lastly, just for a minute, I don't know if you've just given any guidance on this both as far as we guys are estimating as for tax rate for the full-year is that something that you've disclosed or have a window in terms of what you think the tax rate will be for the fourth quarter or full-year rather?

Sorry, can you repeat it again to me?

Sorry, can you hear me is this better. I'm sorry if I'm unheard? Is it better?

Yes.

It's better. Thank you.

Okay. Just wanted to see if you guys are could give any window in terms of what you believe the tax rate will come in for the year?

Oh, the tax rate, yes.

Yes.

So of course there is the big bulge in the tax rate related to the discrete item that we talked about in Q1. And so, yes, set that on the side that $3.4 million that's not really associated to operations of the business. The ongoing tax rate at the company though on current operations is a blend of the old tax system through December 31 and the new system from January 1, onwards so that blends out at around $24.5 million for us.

Okay, perfect. All right. Thank you. That's all I had.

You bet.

[Operator Instructions]. Today's next question comes from Ben Klieve of Noble Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

All right. Thank you. So few questions first bit of a follow-up here regarding the Jamaine's question regarding the pipeline. Zach, you said that roughly half the pipeline is tied to kind of technology-enabled solutions. I'm curious how that roughly 50% number has evolved since the Danya acquisition. And then when you look at the addressable market, where do you see that figure growing to and do you think that figure will be relatively stable in the future or do you think that the kind of tech solutions will expand beyond that 50% number?

Hey good afternoon, Ben. I appreciate the call and the question. Let me start with the latter portion. No, we don't expect it to be stable. We're driving to try to get that number upwards of 60% to 75% hopefully within the next 12 months. Our pipeline is qualified and pursue deals. We expect to hover over around $1.5 billion for opportunities over the next two to three years. And so we have been making that shift and are focusing on that -- in that type of business. And we're finding that addressable market really covers a range of our target agencies, so we feel pretty excited about that. With regard to the first part of it, yes, that that initiative in the middle of 2016 of course was the acquisition of Danya. And Danya brought with it a major shot in the arm of real good systems integration and IT qualifications that we started to put into our capabilities portfolio that we did not have prior to that acquisition. So there were some things we took out of our new business pipeline as a result of that and because we are relatively limited in terms of the resources we can connect to that organic component and then started to bring in the types of deals and now the type of resources that are effective at creating the right value proposition leveraging these new capabilities. So it’s been in evolution and the sales cycle of our business for major deals is generally 18 to 24 months and of course that deal closed in May, and as we started portfolio reshaping, we're starting to hit that stride in 2018.

Perfect, perfect. Thank you. And kind of along the same lines with the investment in technology you referred to increased investment in your SPOT-m technology. Two questions regarding that. One I’m curious if you have an idea of the scale of that investment? And then, secondly, what is that technology kind of lack today or what opportunities do you think are out there that you're hoping to address?

Yes, on the first part, I don't want to put too much detail around Kathryn's commitment but we took into this annual operating plan just north of a $1 million to invest and to expanding our analytics informatics capabilities and it's not just for new business, we have existing clients within HHS and the VA where we think we can continue to enhance our capabilities. This is important because whether it's our re-competes or new business opportunities, the competitive landscape is also changing; we're finding a lot of our peer competitive companies are sharpening their capabilities there too. So that component, that leg of SPOT-m we think is very important for us to continue to invest in. With regard to -- I’m sorry could you repeat the first part of that, the other part of that, Ben?

Yes. I was just curious kind of where the investment in technology, what do you think the investment will address, what how will this help you expand your pipeline or win awards that are already in the pipeline, what's the mission of this investment?

We are pretty guarded before we put on the public space with regard to that because quite frankly some of our peers have access to the data that we're going to share today but I can tell you that when you look across the agencies whether it's Department of Defense very large number of visions within Veterans Health Agency and then two or three major claimants within HHS, Health and Human Services agencies. You will find that the analytics, the capabilities around driving better decisions, the capabilities around driving more effective use of Big Data is becoming more and more important. So we are combining some strategic partnerships with some of the best of breed tools and software and as well as leverage in some strong partnerships on taking more of our solutions to the cloud and FedRAMP certified environment so that we can really leverage some of the best practitioners who leverage today in a major way. That really helps us to reduce the cost of the actual proposed solutions particularly over the long-haul particularly as we have those as more of an in-house investment. So we think we’re pretty far along and feeling pretty comfortable with that expansion.

Okay, perfect.

But this is the right to do with it, Ben, but as you said at the outset, it's just really technology enablement of business process delivery. So to be clear, we’re not talking about becoming a software house or even a large scale systems implementer or integrator but rather we’re talking about technology enablement to the solution we deliver in a way that allows us to be of course more cost effective is great in terms of value demonstration to the customer, but also become more key to the customers operations. And so if we show up with bodies that arrived on the customer system that make us a pretty undifferentiated provider whereas if we're bringing a technology-enabled solution, we’re accessing of course these are major agencies we mentioned that we’re working for they have very massive system implementations and investments of their own. But where we really leverage that is aware to really interface to that to really deliver better value, faster, or cost, higher quality and/or accommodation of all those things in the delivery of our services for their benefit. So that’s really the dimension of technology enablement that we’re talking about.

Got it, perfect. Thanks for the color on that from both of you.

Okay.

I would like to transition to the really -- the really impressive organic growth number 16% in the quarter that’s congrats on that first of all, curious was there any kind of like one-time lumpy bit of revenue that came in or was this all this kind of normalized operations that contributed to that impressive growth figure?

No real one-time event. We've continued to have organic growth in a number of our programs. There is some seasonality that affected and you may remember also last -- we briefed last year that one of our headline programs with the office of Head Start had a -- we had a revision in the manner which we provide some of those services and so there was some variation that did carryover into Q1 to help that. And then the new work which we had with exceptions from some small ones are that Centers for Disease Control, we’ve been able to have the customer put those on some of our existing IDIQ or BPA contracts as opposed to competing them in the open arena. So we'll continue to try to use that, that's much more cost effective use of our BMP dollars to help drive that business doesn't quite get us to press releases or the headlines we like but we think double-digit growth is still a very, very strong position that we want to drive our business development resources towards as we go forward.

Yes, that's absolutely. Okay and last question for me that growth figure, are you able to kind of quantify the level of growth that you saw this quarter from kind of the non-VA Pharmacy and Head Start programs?

Not in a position to give you any real numbers dividing those. Those will continue to be our largest customer book of business certainly 90% of our revenue, north of 90% of our revenue comes from those clients and they're adjacent markets. So still we find substantial addressable opportunities within each of those agencies as well. So we expect that to continue for the foreseeable future. So we will continue to expand within HHS and Head Start, and I would also say that all of the growth, yes, all of the growth that we have encountered in this last year-over-year comparison is within those agencies. We came out of our long range strategic plan mid-year with quite a bit of good outside assessment with regard to other markets, other federal agencies, commercial, state, and local options et cetera. But at the end of the day, it became real clear that we've got a real, real good addressable market. We continue to sharpen as Kathryn indicated our value propositions; we feel that taking our share will help us drive substantial increased shareholder value over the near-term.

Fair again, well that does it from me. Thank you both for taking my questions and again congrats on a really good start to the year.

Thank you.

And our next question today comes from Nelson Obus of Wynnefield Capital. Please go ahead.

Hi Kathryn, I just wanted to go over couple of accounting things here. So in the press release you say that you on a non-GAAP basis, your EBITDA in the quarter was $1.7 million versus $1.1 million, that’s very clear. Then I think you said that first of all I assume a non-GAAP basis means adjusted GAAP, right?

Right, yes.

What I’m really getting at is you’ve done something which is a little different than what most companies do everybody is gravitating to adjusted EBITDA and you’re going back to EBITDA which I think is probably a noble thing to do because things get thrown into adjusted are little questionable for shareholders. But can you just from an accounting perspective when you go from where you are now to pure EBITDA what are the things that fall out of the calculation?

Yes, yes, well of course the most significant of those is going to be that major tax charge in the quarter. So that accounts for $3.7 million of the adjustment from the loss reported which again just it’s a GAAP loss, it's not operational, it's not a cash loss, it's just the reflecting the fact that the tax rate of which those intervals were carried out have to be valued under the new tax law. So a charge of $3.4 million related to that and then regular taxes of course which get added back is another $0.3 million. Then we had of course interest expense on our declining debt of a few hundred thousand, and then depreciation and amortization largely of the acquired intangibles of the Danya acquisition because of course we're a very CapEx lean company. So our natural depreciation on fixed assets is a couple of pennies put together, but there is a non-cash charge related to amortizing our acquired intangibles.

Right.

Pretty clean.

I may have misunderstood. In other words what you just did ways you took EBITDA and adjusted it for a cleaner number from operations, correct?

Yes.

Did I misunderstand you that now you're not, you're going to go away from adjusted EBITDA and back to the more standard calculation you got me really confused here?

You're right.

You're absolutely right about that, right.

Let me de confuse here a little bit, Nelson. We were very intentional as we look to going into this New Year for us at whether or not adjusted EBITDA still serves our purpose. And as you well know, we're as a transitioning company the materiality of some of the things that were non-cash over the last several years or not as material to us anymore and therefore we think from an analogous perspective cleaner is better. Adjusted EBITDA always have some connotations as to really what various companies do and we believe then there's pros and cons but we do believe that moving to and we will continue to stay in a straight EBITDA model right now reflects the status of the company where we are today and more importantly where we expect to be over the next couple of years, such that some of the items that were material and sending misinformation to the analyst two years ago are no longer in that status for us. So, yes, it was intentional change for us, appreciate your observation there that we're moving away from adjusted EBITDA for the long haul and believe that we are now a company that EBITDA serves our analysts in a much better fashion.

Well done. Let me play devil's advocate here, okay. Certainly one thing that goes out is comp which I -- when you go from adjusted to EBITDA, you take out compensation which I think is great. But I have to say this to you. This is a company that is probably not done making acquisitions, so if you go on to EBITDA from adjusted EBITDA for a foreseeable future, and then you make an acquisition; you're going to be right back in the rough of explaining such things related to a deal that are not recurring. And I'm not trying to be friendly here but for a company that is paced down debt as rapidly as you have and generates a whole lot of free cash flow, it seems inevitable another Danya will creep up and then EBITDA might not be in fact that we go so far to say would be misleading as opposed to adjusted EBITDA because it wouldn't reflect EBITDA would not reflect those transitional non-recurring expenses. So I hope you see where I'm going it just seems like an usual move for a company with your kind of free cash flow and your stated desire to continue to look for value-added acquisitions for the shareholders.

Yes, thanks. A year ago to note, Nelson to your point why I did indicate that there's some trade-off for us and that's one of them and as you know, it is our incentive comp that is usually been that blip historically and now that does transition over to being those costs associated with acquisitions that is still consistent with part of our strategy, and we did have a good fair, good debate, around is now the right time for that. Kathryn, do you want to add any other color to that?

No. I think that's right. I guess the difference is that while we do expect this acquisition expenses episodically as we identify targets down the road. We think that we can supplement reporting as appropriate for those intervals when necessary, but on a standing basis providing EBITDA which puts us -- takes away those the step of an analyst having to compare, understand, how do you do adjusted EBITDA versus how does this peer do adjusted EBITDA taking that issue off the table, we thought was appropriate.

Yes. Go ahead.

And congratulations there.

Let me make two points. Number one I think that supplementary of information will be very helpful.

That's right.

And number two you and the board should recognize that the reason that you got into this whole rigmarole with me is because you generate too much free cash and that allows you to make acquisitions. And yes, it's called a high quality problem but so the supplementary information I think is important and there was no doubt in my mind that the Eagles would blow them out.

No comment.

Stop asking in the glove.

What all I’d say if there’s any gambler I took the money line on the Eagles.

I'm sure there are some as well. We'll thank you Nelson. We appreciate the feedback and the question.

Thanks for joining us.

And ladies and gentlemen, I see no further questions in the queue. So at this time, I’d like to turn the call back over to Mr. Parker for any closing remarks.

Well again thank you everyone. We really appreciate your attention and contributions to the success of DLH. As Kathryn and I wrap up, we certainly invite any that are in and around the Atlanta area this -- later this week to please join us for the Annual Meeting of the shareholders. And stay tuned we look forward to chatting with everyone for our second quarter of fiscal 2018. Have a blessed day.

Thank you, sir. Today’s conference has now concluded. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.