Kathryn M. Johnbull
Analyst · AFM Investments
Thank you, Zach, and good morning, everyone. Revenues for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012 were $13 million and $12.6 million, respectively, which represents in the quarter an increase of $0.4 million or 3.1%, as Zach mentioned, despite extended government delay in major awards. The increase in revenue is due primarily to expansion on current programs. Revenues for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012 were a $26 million and $24.1 million, respectively, which represents an increase of $1.9 million or 7.8% over the prior fiscal period. The increase in revenue is also -- this increase for the year-to-date is also due primarily to expansion on current programs, as well as having the full 6-month impact of new business awards received during the prior year period. Gross profit for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012 was $1.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, which represents an increase of $0.5 million or 36.4%. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit was 13.6% and 10.3%, respectively, for the 3 months ended March 13, 2013 and 2012. The gross profit rates overall benefited from improved contract contra performance in cost management. Gross profit for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 was $3.6 million and $2.9 million, respectively, which represents an increase of $0.7 million or 24.3% over the prior fiscal year period. As a percentage of revenue, gross profit was 13.7% and 11.9% for the 6 months ended 2013 and 2012, respectively. The gross margins for the 6-month period also benefited from increased revenue and improved contract performance and cost management. General and administrative or G&A expenses for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were $1.7 million and $1.8 million, respectively, a decrease of $0.1 million or 5.8%. As a percent of revenue, G&A expenses were 13.3% and 14.5%, respectively, for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012. G&A expenses for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 were flat at $3.6 million. As a percent of revenue, G&A expenses were 13.8% and 14.9% for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These improvements in the G&A rate were due to resource consolidation and cost reduction initiatives we undertook to allow greater leverage of our resources as revenue grew. Income from operations for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013, was approximately $9,000, as compared to a loss from operations for the 3 months ended March 31, 2012 of approximately $564,000. The improvement in income from operations results from improved gross margin and decreased general -- G&A expenses described above. The company reported a loss from operations for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013, which was approximately $84,000, as compared to a loss from operations for the 6 months ended March 31 of 2012 of approximately $774,000. Net loss for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013, was $0.1 million or $0.01 per basic and diluted share, as compared to loss from continuing operations of $0.7 million or $0.12 per basic and diluted share for the 3 months ended March 31, 2012. Net loss for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013, was $0.2 million or $0.03 per basic and diluted share, as compared to a net loss of $1.1 million or $0.18 per basic and diluted share for the 6 months ended March 31, 2012. These improvements were due to increased gross profit, constraints on spending and reduced other expenses. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization, or EBITDA, adjusted for other noncash charges, or also known as adjusted EBITDA, for the 3 months ended March 31, 2013, was $80,000, as compared to a loss of $487,000 for the 3 months ended March 31, 2012. Adjusted EBITDA for the 6 months ended March 31, 2013, was $109,000, as compared to a loss of $503,000 for the 6 months ended March 31, 2012, due principally to the increased gross profit and reduced expenses explained a few moments ago. Moving onto the company's capital structure. As of March 31, 2013, the company had $3.2 million in cash. The company release we had adequate reserves to fund operations over the next 12 months in due of its existing cash position, the additional funding committed by our lender and the forecasted cash flow from operations. We believe we're on track to meet our FY '13 objectives. Our cost-reduction focus has quickly shown results in the first 6 months of fiscal 2013 and should continue to yield additional efficiencies in upcoming quarters and allow us to sustain positive adjusted EBITDA over the upcoming quarters. As Zach noted previously, the Houlihan Lokey and PSB conference provided some useful insights into the ways that companies are successfully managing through the impacts of sequestration. I'm pleased that DLH has already taken action and implemented many of the strategies suggested during the event. We remain, as always, focused on customer engagement and providing same outstanding quality levels of service we have throughout our history. We've established proactive cost savings namely as we discussed in a previous quarter our Project LEAN, that allows us to stay ahead of the curve rather than behind it. And finally, we cross-utilized our personnel to maximize their skill sets and leverage fully our team to ensure efficiencies and continuity throughout our sites. That concludes my discussion of the financial statements, and I'll now turn it back over to Zach.