Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the DraftKings’ Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Please be advised that today’s conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Stanton Dodge, Chief Legal Officer. Please go ahead.

Good morning, everyone, and thanks for joining us today. Statements we make during this call that are not statements of historical facts constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our historical results or from our forecast. We assume no responsibility for updating forward-looking statements. For more information, please refer to the risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in our SEC filings. During the call, management will also discuss certain non-GAAP measures that we believe may be useful in evaluating DraftKings’ operating performance. These measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for DraftKings’ financial results prepared in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is available in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed today with the SEC and in our earnings presentation, which is available on our website at investors.draftkings.com. Hosting the call today, we have Jason Robins, Co-Founder, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of DraftKings, who will share some opening remarks and an update on our business; and Jason Park, Chief Financial Officer of DraftKings, who will provide a review of our financials. We will then open up the line to questions. I will now turn the call over to Jason Robins.

Good morning, everyone. On today’s call, I will cover six key messages. First, we generated $298 million of revenue in Q2 due to excellent engagement from our customers and no discernible adverse impact from the reopening of the economy. Second, we saw positive legislative momentum continue, with several states authorizing mobile sports wagering this year. Third, we continue to make big strides on product and technology, including the migration to our in-house bet engine. Fourth, we are laying the foundation for our media and content business. Fifth, we are launching an exciting new vertical in the non-fungible token industry under the brand of DraftKings Marketplace. And before turning it over to Jason Park, I will also provide an update on our ongoing responsible gaming initiative. We continued to deliver strong and healthy revenue growth in the second quarter of 2021. Revenue for the quarter increased 297% year-over-year to $298 million on a pro forma basis. Monthly unique players increased 281% to 1.1 million and average revenue per monthly unique player increased 26% to $80. While year-over-year comparisons were obviously impacted by COVID, our results were very strong relative to our expectation. At this stage, we’re not seeing any signs of the economies reopening impacting demand for our mobile product offerings. We continue to acquire customers efficiently with tech at or below our target. And as a data-driven company, we will dial up or down our investments according to the numbers. ARPMUP is also outperforming our expectations, which may be an indication that player LTVs could be even better than we thought. As of now, we are not making any adjustments to our models or internal CAC target. Engagement in the quarter was outstanding across all our products, particularly during the NBA and NHL playoffs and finals, major golf tournament, Champions…

Thank you, Jason, and good morning, everyone. Before I begin, I want to remind everyone that we will be discussing our results on a combined company pro forma basis to improve comparability as if we owned our B2B business starting on January 1, 2020 rather than on April 23, 2020. We are pleased to announce that we generated $298 million in revenue for the quarter, representing a 297% increase versus Q2 2020 revenue of $75 million. Our B2C business generated $270 million for the quarter, representing a 383% increase versus prior year. We continued to drive strong growth in players and player retention as measured through MUP, as well as player engagement and monetization as measured through ARPMUP. B2C monthly unique payers in the quarter increased 281% year-over-year to $1.1 million. The increase reflects strong unique payer retention and acquisition across DFS, OSB and iGaming. The expansion of our OSB and iGaming product offerings into new states and the lack of traditional sports for much of the second quarter of 2020. Q2 MUPs represented typical seasonality with Q2 being a slower sports quarter than Q1. Average revenue per monthly unique payer or ARPMUP was $80 in Q2 representing a 26% increase versus the same period in 2020. Our ARPMUP was positively impacted by the return to our more normal sports schedule, which resulted in stronger and more consistent customer engagement across our DFS and sportsbook product offering. The launch of our sportsbook and iGaming product offerings in additional states also positively impacted our product mix. We also continue to drive engagement across our B2C product offerings, as we cross sell our users into more products. Clearly, a portion of the tremendous year-over-year growth of our B2C business is due to the sports cancellations and postponements that occurred in Q2 2020…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question will come from the line of Shaun Kelley from Bank of America. You may begin.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I was wondering if we could just dig in a little further on the customer acquisition spending outlook for the third quarter of the back half. Maybe just help us a little bit with the timing. It looks like you got very good cost leverage this quarter with on the sales and marketing line and those numbers coming down sequentially. So just what’s the right expectation for thinking about that investment, especially into NFL and giving the timing of probably some of your larger broadcast contracts and like?

Thank you, Shaun. So really, we’re going to start with – we’ve seen recently that while we kind of expected or at least about there might be some slowdown in performance due to the reopening, we’re not seeing that. So based on what we’re seeing today, I would expect we’re going to get very good results going into NFL. NFL is basically like our holiday season. It’s when we acquire the most new players and reactivate large portions of the player base. We do have a lower CAC target, as the players that we acquire tend to be a little bit more casual than the ones that we acquire and say, Q2. So we’re going to manage that CAC target and we’ll dial the investment up or down accordingly based on results, which is really hard to predict. I mean, we always learn a lot the first week going into NFL. And based on what we’ve seen recently, I would expect strong results, we’ll continue and we’ll want to invest into it. But it’s really hard to say and we’ll be monitoring the data on an hourly basis and turning campaigns on and off accordingly.

Thank you very much.

Our next question will come from the line of Stephen Grambling from Goldman Sachs. You may begin.

Hey, thanks. I guess just following up on the outlook, I think that you referenced that the dollar guidance is roughly unchanged. When we think about the math, I guess, what are some of the puts and takes to think about that could drive numbers above or below, I guess, as we think about the strong growth that you’ve seen, and it looks like that’s embedding some deceleration?

Are you talking about Q3 specifically?

I guess both Q3 and Q4.

I think, we raised a little bit in the back half of the year, but you’re right, we aren’t necessarily banking on the overperformance we’ve seen in Q1 and Q2 carrying over. I think that continues to be us being a bit cautious about what this NFL season might look like. Obviously, COVID has been up and down and we could see this swing either way. But based on what we see today, everyone’s going to be back in stadiums, gatherings will be back to normal generally in most places. So we’re just being a bit cautious given how significant the NFL period is for customer acquisition and activation about what we think will happen in the back half of the year. Also, there’s only three weeks of NFL in Q3. So it’s not – it’s an interesting period because you activate a lot of players, but a lot of their spending comes in Q4. So the ARPMUP is typically not as high in Q3 as we see in other quarters. So that’s something we’re also paying attention to.

Got it. And I guess the NCAA being back would be maybe a partial offset. I guess, one follow-up, I guess, on the SBTech integration. I know that you talked about some of the increased functionality. How are you thinking about the kind of milestones? Do you feel like the most challenging aspects are behind you? Or do you still have to kind of test it through the NFL season? Thank you.

Yes, that’s a great question. So we’ve definitely tested it quite extensively over the last few weeks. We’ve migrated in all, but one state not one is pending approval. So we feel pretty good, obviously, we want to see how NFL looks from a trading perspective. But we’ve done pretty rigorous testing throughout the other sports on the calendar, and we feel pretty good about it. We launched Same Game Parlays last week, which was a big feature that our customers have been asking for also typically has a higher margin. So we have not built in any additional revenue or any additional whole percentage based on new features we’re launching. We don’t sort of building off what you said. We want to test those things and see how they look going into NFL before we would promise any more revenue based on it. But we do think that there’s some potential upside in the new features that we’ll be launching in the coming weeks and months.

Thanks. Best of luck.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Jed Kelly from Oppenheimer. You may begin.

Hey, great. Thanks for taking my question. Just falling back up on the SBTech and Same Game Parlays, I expect you plan to market that product into NFL, and you think that will close the yield gap with some of your competitors at a little more vertically integrated. And then another question, just on the seasonality on MUP, the decline in sports betting, Jason, how do you think of sort of making sports betting a year round phenomenon and not as decently dependent on football? Thank you.

So on the first question I think that we certainly have seen evidence across other companies in the marketplace that Same Game Parlays have a higher yield. So we could certainly see that we have not built that into any of our forward-looking guidance. So we’re not counting on it, but it’s something that we’re certainly hoping will be the case. And in general, I would say, we’re not really trying to maximize whole percentage at this stage. We’re on boarding a lot of new customers. It’s the early days of the industry. So really, we’re focusing on getting people onto the platform, getting them active and there’ll be a time and a place where we’ll focus more attention on increasing whole percentage. It’s just not right now. And then sorry, what was the second question?

Just on MUPs, we saw a seasonal decline. I mean, how do you think about sort of making sports betting more year round and not as dependent on football, it might be impossible, but how do you think about that?

I don’t know – certainly, we think that as more people try more sports, it’ll smooth out a little bit. There are certain sports like soccer, which are very popular among the younger generations, which I think over time will increase. But you’re right, the sports themselves are seasonal. So it’s very hard for us to control anything when there’s popularity difference between different sports. And there are only certain times a year. As hard as we may try, we’re not at any time soon going to be able to get more people to bet on basketball or baseball than they do on NFLs, just based on the fan base size. So that’s something that I think just will always have to kind of live with on sports, but what we can do is continue to launch other types of products. So, obviously, iGaming has been a good one for us. That’s something that people can play year-round. We’re cross-selling very effectively onto that product. So while certainly, we see bumps when there’s more actives, we do think it’s a bit smoother seasonally. We recently announced that we’re launching the marketplace. So NFTs, I think will be a year-round thing. There might be some seasonality given the sports focus, but we’re also going to branch into NFTs for other things outside of sports. So I think is that that product continues to grow in the coming years, we’ll see that help smooth out. So I think really that’s the way that we’re looking at smoothing out seasonality is just trying to diversify into other products that we can effectively cross-sell our customers into and might have a little bit less seasonal variation.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Michael Graham from Canaccord. You may begin.

Yes. Thank you and congrats on the great performance, I wanted to ask two, one on ARPMUP. Jason, if you could just take us under the hood a little bit on what’s driving that strength. You mentioned cross-selling a minute ago, is it iGaming? Is it more sports being engaged in by each player or bigger bets from players? Or just can you tell us anything that helps us understand that? And then you had mentioned a long time ago that when you got to one-third coverage of the United States, that you would switch a lot of resources towards national ads. And I know you’re sort of like almost there, but not quite there. Just wondering if you could update us on sort of how you’re thinking about the marketing mix going forward.

So thanks for the question that regarding ARPMUP, certainly there’s some seasonality to it Q3 because it’s a high activation quarter, but only a few weeks of NFL to monetize, I think we’ll have lower ARPMUP than Q2. But even relatively speaking, meaning, year-over-year and actually, given the sport calendar change really looking at 2019 can be helpful versus Q2 2021. I think that we’re cautiously optimistic that we might just have a higher LTV player than we thought. And I think that’s probably the biggest driver beyond anything else. We have also improved cross sell rates. So iGaming is helping, but even on the course, sports betting products, I think that it’s still looking like ARPMUP was higher than expected again with the caveat that, it’s hard to compare anything Q2 versus 2020 Q2. And looking back at 2019, it was a very different time than only a few states that we had. I think, live was sports betting at that point. So actually I think it might’ve just been New Jersey at that point. Although, it could be wrong on that, there might’ve been one or two others. Never mind, I’m sorry. It was New Jersey, West Virginia and Indiana at that point. So there were only a few. So it’s a little hard to compare, but that’s why we’ve also not changed our CAC targets. We’re not counting on higher LTVs, but we’re certainly optimistic cautiously that that could be the case. And we’re going to be monitoring that in the coming quarters and hopefully, we’ll have more data as the sports schedule stabilizes and it’s easier to make year-over-year comparisons. And then the second question was sorry, remind me what the second question was? On national ad spend, right? So we’re at right now 25% of the population. I do think there’s a possibility that some new states will launch either right before during the NFL season Wyoming and Arizona being two that seemed like they’re on a good track. And I think others like Louisiana may get in there as well. And if that happens, I still don’t think we’ll quite be at 33%. But I do think you’ll see us start to mix some national advertising in this year to test that. I think it’s important that if we’re planning on shifting quite a bit, as we get into the mid-30s and 40s level international advertising, that we have some data in this NFL season to look at, to be able to optimize for next year. So you will see us start to test into that this NFL season.

Great. Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Bernie McTernan from Needham and Company. You may begin.

Great, good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Just to follow up before Jason, you mentioned a bit more cautious on the NFL. I was hoping to dive into that a little bit more. Is it competitive environment or something else you were referring to?

Well, I think we’re still waiting to see what a year it’s potentially people in stadiums and more of an open economy looks like that. The biggest factor, of course, that could change. We also don’t know that. So I think there’s a lot of moving variables and we’re just trying to exercise caution and not getting overly bullish based on results that we’ve seen. Early on suggesting that the reopening is having no adverse effect on the momentum we’ve seen. If we get an NFL season under our belt with the economy, generally open around the country and around the states, we have online sports betting and iGaming. I think then we start to feel really good that we’re not going to see any adverse impact in that. It’s really just truly momentum in the industry and with drafting.

Understood. And then just to drill down the NFT marketplace for a second, could you just talk about like what the economics of a transaction in the marketplace are the level of investment of time and money that it will take and kind of what’s the upside opportunity? I think there’s three or four major NFT marketplaces right now. Do you need to be a top operator to really move the needle for the company? Or is that the right way to think about it?

I think it is the right way to think about it, because being marketplace having liquidity is important that said we also have exclusive rights that we’ve secured through our relationship with Autograph to be able to sell an NFTs that are for top athletes like Tom Brady, Wayne Gretzky, Naomi Osaka, Tiger Woods, Derek Jeter, and many others, Tony Hawk, many others. So we feel pretty good that having that exclusivity, no matter how liquid our marketplace is, initially, we will drive a lot of traffic, but over the long-term, I think being a marketplace, it’s important to have the highest or close to highest level of liquidity, people are going to go where there’s the most buying and selling when they’re posting secondary transactions and things like that, which is true of any marketplace really. So I think that is how we’re looking at it. We do have a much larger user base than any of the other marketplaces that exist today. So we feel like we’re starting from a position of strength. Much like the daily fantasy user base has helped us with we launched online sports betting into other states. I think that having a big database with millions of active customers will really be a leg up for us and it just comes down to how effectively can we cross sell. And I think we feel pretty good about that given our track record of selling other – cross selling other products, but this is also our first foray into something it’s a little bit different. So we’re going to have to see how the data shakes out.

Understood. Thanks taking the questions.

Our next question will come from the line of Ben Chaiken from Credit Suisse. You may begin.

Hey, how’s it going? It looks like the –it seems like the media angle is particularly interesting. You talked about MLB streaming, I think you mentioned exploring some subscription revenues, if I caught that I guess when it comes to unique sporting events that require a one-time payment or some type of exclusive access I guess I’m thinking like boxing or out of network game, why not offer a promotion that allows access upon signup and deposit with DraftKings high level, it just seems like the cost of that versus your normal CAC is compelling relative to other channels. Is that something you could do? And then forgive me if this question lacks awareness in some way, and there’s no obvious answer. Why it wouldn’t work? Thanks.

All right. I think it’s a great idea. That’s definitely something we’ve talked about. In order to do, it depends on the event, but most of the time you have to have the rights. So that’s something that we’ll look into exploring as well and those rights of course costs money. So while, giving it away is one way to look at it. It’s actually really the cost of the right that matters, which of course are lower than the cost of the pay-per-view because that’s how money is made by companies that traditionally do that. So that’s something that we’re absolutely looking at amongst other things. We’re still very early in developing our media strategy. Our goal is to have much more of it fleshed out by the end of the year and have explored some of those opportunities in the marketplace, such as the one you mentioned to see if we don’t – it could be something that works for us. We do want the media vertical to on its own be a profit generating vertical certainly over the long-term. I think, we have the flexibility to not do that if we wanted to, but as of today, we believe that we can both make a profit directly in the vertical and have the synergistic benefit of being able to acquire and keep retain users using the content that we put out there as well.

Got you. That makes sense. And then just quickly follow-up or second question would be, I think – I know Canada is not in your numbers, but it sounds like Ontario is going to be alive maybe by the end of this year, October, November, who knows. But will that fall – will Canada follow a similar cadence to how you’ve launched new states, and I think you’ve provided some guidance around New Jersey and other states about how you think about promotion, external marketing. Is that a reasonable way to think about Canada? Or is there a different format just because this is a little size-wise is different?

I think we look at it the same way. It’s an LTV to CAC question. We have plenty of daily fantasy customers in Canada, and we don’t see really any differences between their spend levels and the customers that we have in the U.S. So I don’t really have any reason to believe it’s different. The interesting thing about Canada is that most major operators around the world have been in Canada for quite some time. So it’s a little bit different than new U.S. states where they’re opening up. And in some ways I think we have to focus on taking customers that have already been playing as much as trying to convert new customers, which is why we projected a lower long-term market share for Canada than we have for the U.S. One thing I wanted to – just on your previous question note as well that occurred to me after I answered. A lot of pay-per-views that distribute through multiple platforms, they actually have in their contracts with the platforms they distribute on that no one can give away for a free, or even under a certain price because it undermines the other platforms. They would say, why would anyone pay to for a pay-per-view on my platform, if they’re getting it free elsewhere? Very common in the media industry, there’s lots of things like this, MFMs are a very common thing and also restrictions on what you can and can’t sell things for very common. So, that’s something we would have to work around unless we had exclusive rights to distribute a pay-per-view.

Makes sense. Thank you.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Robin Farley from UBS. You may begin.

Great. Thanks. Can you quantify a little bit of how much of the revenue raised for the year is due to new initiative like Marketplace?

Hi, Robin. We have not built in any additional revenue expectation from new initiatives. We really don’t have enough data, we have no data to base it on. So we haven’t assumed any new states. We haven’t assumed any new initiatives generating revenue. Those are all things that once we have a little bit more clarity on the state side as to which dates and when might go live, we would be able to update. And then as we get a little bit of data on new initiatives, I think we’d be able to update that. That said, I wouldn’t expect new initiatives to generate a huge amount of revenue this year. This will be very early days of us launching them. Obviously, we have very strong conviction and are very excited about the long-term prospects and think that the market that we’re entering like NFTs could be really, really large. But it’ll take a little time for those new products to ramp.

Okay. Thanks. And then other question is on the agreement that you signed with Genius Sports, you mentioned your access to all of your other data outside of the NFL or that was part of the deal. Does that lower your cost in some way for things outside of the NFL, in other words, was it packaged with other things that lower the cost that you’ve been paying for that data elsewhere?

That’s a great question. We aren’t really able to give any specifics on that contract. But what we will say is that we do not expect any adverse effects to our long-term gross margin projections based on the pricing that we receive. So I think you can kind of read between the lines based on that. But due to confidentiality, we’re not able to disclose any details of the contract.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question will come from the line of David Katz from Jefferies. You may begin.

Hi. Good morning, everyone. My one question and it’s one that I’ve asked two quarters back, but not lately is around in-game wagering and the breadth of offerings there, obviously we’re reminded by the parlay indication. If you could just talk about the breadth of offerings where you are today and what we can reasonably expect in the future. And is that something that’s entirely driven within the confines of OSB tech or other, B2B services or tuck-ins or other things you may need to fully build that out? Thanks.

Thank you. One of the things that really we’ve noted, we’re excited about with now having migrated to our in-house platform is the ability to drive innovation and things like in-game wagering and other innovative types of bets that previously we had a lot more dependence on our partner can before. So we’re really excited about that. And it’s been an all consuming thing the migration. As you can imagine, it was a large project, the largest we’ve ever done from a product and technology perspective. And it’s a real testament to the great people on our product and engineering team to be able to have not only done that a little bit ahead of schedule, but also to have continued to launch new things, including our upcoming launch of Marketplace, but also several new states and other sorts of things along the way, including DK Craps and many iGaming games that we released. So really just – I’m so proud of that team for not only ahead of schedule completing a very smooth migration, but also continuing to innovate. But it is true that it was very all consuming. And so, I think now that that’s mostly behind us, we do still have one state left. We’re really in a position to start focusing on driving innovation and launching new things. As far as third-parties, much like our iGaming product, we’re going to do both. There’s just a speed to market aspect of being able to integrate different providers and also at the same time launch things ourselves. And much like what we’re doing with iGaming, we’ll look at things that either we can’t get through third-party providers or economically, it just makes sense for us to bring in-house. And we’ll do that over time with the goal being most things are in-house over the long-term. But there’s just such a long tail of different types of bets and same thing on iGaming, different types of games that there’s always going to be a mix of things that we’ve completely built on our own and things that we’ve built either partially or in partnership with third-parties.

Okay. Perfect. Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Joe Stauff from Susquehanna. You may begin.

Good morning, Jason and Jason. One other question to add on regarding your product offering. How do you think about, especially given your newfound flexibility in the in-house platform about extending out to different consumer segments? Again, whether they be offshore or something – I know it’s not an immediate thing, but how do you think about extending your product into those other consumer segments say over time?

So I definitely think that there’s an opportunity as you noted to expand globally, and that’s something that we’re looking at doing either inorganically or organically or a combination of the two. But I think within sports betting, the opportunity to maybe branch into other sports that we haven’t had as deep of an offering, it could reach different types of people is interesting. And I think something that we’re exploring. And then, outside of sports, which we’ve always – isn’t specific to the migration of course. We definitely feel in the iGaming segment that we do better with people who are sports fans that we can cross sell. And we’ve been working hard to try to extend our brand and extend our reach into the non-sports fan iGaming audience. And that’s something I think we’ve been getting a bit of traction on, but really need to continue to invest. I think that’s probably the biggest opportunity for us now in terms of consumer segments that we’re just not penetrating at the moment.

Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Stephen Glagola from Cowen. You may begin.

Hi. Thanks for the question. I just wanted to unpack the announcement with Genius yesterday, a bit more on Same Game Parlays. Where the Same Game Parlays launched on the app a product built in-house by DraftKings? Or are you using Genius’ BetBuilder product? And if it is Genius’ product, why are using their product? I believe, BetMGM is also using that same product and FanDuel has developed an in-house parlay product. So if you can just talk around that please.

Yes. I mentioned this a few moments ago, but we’re going to put out a mix of different things that are organically developed and things where we’re partnering. And it’s going to depend on a variety of factors, such as the opportunity cost of building them in the short-term, the actual cost of using a third-party. In this particular case, it was packaged up with a larger deal. So we felt like it was a good way to get Same Game Parlays into the market really quickly in advance of NFL. And it frees up our engineering time to focus on other things. So that’s a lot of how in the short-term we’re going to look at it. If there’s a good solution, it gets us something as good or better than what our competitors have. And we can free up engineering bandwidth to focus on other things that maybe our competitors don’t have. That’s going to be the initial focus. And then over time, I think we will take things that prove to be large parts of our offering that we think there’s an economic benefit to vertically integrating and focused on those. But in the short-term, it’s really about as quickly as possible having the broadest and deepest product offerings, since we think at this stage of getting maximum activation and retention of consumers is the most important thing.

All right. Thanks, Jason. But just to be clear, so that is – it is the – that is the Betgenius product and that is on the app right now for the parlay.

I believe so. I know we were using, because we just announced the deal, I think yesterday and we had the Same Game Parlays we launched earlier this week. I know we were using another provider. I’m not sure if we fully switched over to Betgenius yet, but that’s the plan.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question will come from the line of Barry Jonas from Truist Securities. You may begin.

States have been slower to legalize iGaming than say sports betting. I know your expectations there as the same as sports betting, but what do you think needs to happen to get more momentum on the iGaming legalization front?

I think, we’ve always felt, and I think have said that it’s going to be sports first and then iGaming. I think that that’s just the kind of natural evolution of things that states are going to be more comfortable in many cases going sports first. And then, once they get used to the tax revenues coming in, see more and more states doing iGaming, we think more and more states are comfortable with iGaming as well. Some states such as Connecticut this year chose to do them all at once, Michigan did the same thing, Pennsylvania did the same thing. So we may see that here and there. And then we may see states like West Virginia, for example, that it’s sports betting first and then a year or two later, did iGaming. So I think it will be a mix, but we certainly expect the momentum to be first with sports betting legalization, and then iGaming to be something that follows that. I think that in terms of your question about how to get them comfortable, I think there’s really two things. One is just most states don’t want to be the guinea pigs. So more and more that they see other states particularly it tends to be regional in their geographic areas doing it. And the more that they feel like, everything’s going well and the playbook on how to regulate it is clear, the more I think, comfort they’ll get. I think also seeing how much tax revenue can be generated and back to the kind of regional point, if there’s bleed from states like, right neighboring them because they have iGaming and a state that’s chosen to do sports betting does not. I think that could be a reason that they move faster. But it’s really just time. And we’re going to continue to push the message out there that this is something that can be done in a safe manner. We have great guardrails in place and are continuing to invest in getting better at responsible gaming and there’s real meaningful tax revenue that can be generated by adding that product.

Thank you.

Our next question will comes from the line of Ryan Sigdahl with Craig-Hallum Capital. You maybe begin.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in. Nice metrics on New Jersey iGaming that you gave, really strong performance there. What do you think is driving that accelerated market share gain recently here versus the past several quarters? And then secondly, why do you think you’re having more success taking share on gaming versus the OSB? Thanks.

Great good question. I mean, I think iGaming is actually and hopefully it foreshadows OSB a great example of where we’ve invested in launching our own games and enhancing our own products. And for example, we mentioned we had launched our own in-house Craps game last quarter. And I think that that’s really helped generate momentum and gain market share. And we’ve been really consumed with the migration. And also of course, there are many things we couldn’t do on the product front before migrating. So I think now that we’re finally in a position where we control our own destiny there and we’re able to innovate, I hope to be able to do many of the same things that we’ve done in the last several quarters on the iGaming front product-wise. And we hope that that helps us gain more share and retain and acquire customers more effectively.

Great. Thanks guys. Good luck.

Thank you.

And our last question for today will be coming from the line Mike Hickey from The Benchmark Company. You may begin.

Nice. Good morning, Jason, Jason, nice quarter guys and guide. Congrats. First one, just any progress that you made on sort of adding social layers to your app. I think that was sort of a theme on your last call tie in on retention there on your user base. And the second question on NFTs, just curious, obviously the crossbow opportunities seems like a no brainer but curious on the user acquisition side, thinking about key offerings maybe tied into live events and that can bring players into the ecosystem. Thanks guys.

Thanks. Social is off to a great start. It’s very early. I mean, we launched an MVP only a few months ago, and so we still feel like we have a very lengthy and exciting roadmap there. But the early results have been very strong. We’ve seen great adoption. We monitor daily and monthly active users on the social features, separate from daily and monthly active users on the product – on the other products. And we’ve seen that continually increasing since we’ve launched. And I think we’ll learn a lot in NFL season based on how many of our customers that we acquire and active we’re able to get adopting those social features. So very excited about it. I think it’s too early to share any metrics. But we’re starting to flesh out what metrics we might be comfortable sharing on the coming – in the coming quarters. On the NFT side, I definitely feel like it’ll be a great cross-sell product. We’ll know when we get the data, but we’ve done enough market research on our customers to know that quite a few of them are interested in it and there’s good overlap with our current customer base. And I do agree that it could also potentially have some upside on the customer acquisition side, just like we do with every product in our portfolio, which are the best products to most efficiently bring people onto the platform. And then once they’re on the platform, we try to cross sell them across everything we do. And I think there could be some upside on that front for sure, but we’re going to have to wait and see, and really we’ll do whatever the data suggests. But it’s something that we’ve talked about it’s a potential upside. And in general, I think just having the broadest product portfolio gives us the most options for how we can acquire different pockets of customers. So not only does it increase LTV, but also has positive effect on our tax efficiency over time to just have the broadest and deepest product portfolio possible.

Thank you. That’s all the time we have for questions today.

Thank you all for joining us on today’s call. We appreciate your questions and look forward to continuing our conversations with you. Our performance in 2021 continues to be very strong and we’re excited for what the rest of the year and beyond holds for us. DraftKings is well-positioned with $2.6 billion in cash to capitalize on legislative advancements in several states, complete the migration to our own in-house set engine, expand and initiate relationships with important organizations and advanced new product technology and content initiatives. I hope you all stay safe and well and we look forward to speaking with you on our next earnings call in November.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.