Good morning, and welcome to the Delek US Holdings 2023 First Quarter Conference Call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode for the duration of the call. [Operator Instructions] After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please also note that this event is being recorded today. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rosy Zuklic, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning, and welcome to the Delek US first quarter earnings conference call. Participants on today's call will include Avigal Soreq, President and CEO; Joseph Israel, EVP, Operations; Reuven Spiegel, EVP and Chief Financial Officer; Mark Hobbs, EVP, Corporate Development. Today's presentation material can be found on the Investor Relations section of the Delek US website. Slide 2 contains our Safe Harbor statement. We'll be making forward-looking statements during today's call and actual results may differ materially from today's comments. Factors that could cause actual results to differ are included here as well as in our SEC filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to Avigal.

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. We reported a strong first quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $285 million, a first quarter record for Delek US. We generated $395 million cash from operations. In addition, we reduced consolidated debt by $281 million. Our team executed well in the quarter. We generated significant earnings in the Refining segment. This was achieved despite the Tyler refinery major plant turnaround during the quarter. With this turnaround behind us, we are well positioned to capture market opportunities as they present themselves. We do not have a major turnaround in our system scheduled until late Q4 of 2024. Our Logistics segment delivered strong in adjusted EBITDA. This is the results of the investments we have made in our Midland businesses. As an example, compared with last year, we have more than doubled the volume in the Midland Gathering system. We remain focused on our key priorities. I will now take a few minutes to provide an update on each and every one of them. First, returning value to shareholders and optimizing our balance sheet. During the first quarter, we used excess cash to do what we committed to do. At the Delek US Holding, we paid down $327 million of debt. Given the strong performance, we started buying back our shares in the second quarter. Today, we have -- up to today we have repurchased $40 million of DK shares. Also on May 2, our Board of Directors approved 4.5% increase to the regular dividend. Second strategic is the vision to create a long-term value to our shareholders. Our team is dedicated. We are working night and day on the sum of the parts initiative. We continue to make progress. We are committed to make a long-term good decision that drive shareholder value. A…

Thank you, Avigal. I'm thrilled to join the Delek family. And I have no doubt our strong talent and competitive position across the system are positioning us well for future success. Our safe and reliable operations in the first quarter allowed us to leverage favorable market conditions and deliver strong results. I will now provide additional details about our operations in a slightly modified format with the objective to provide more visibility regarding our performance and plans going forward. Starting with our Tyler refinery. As Avigal mentioned, the team successfully executed a 49-day oil-to-oil major turnaround. Beyond routine maintenance and reliability upgrades, the scope included yield improvement projects, mainly around the FCC and DHT with an estimated $0.40 per barrel of margin capture improvement going forward. Turnaround cost was consistent with our plan at approximately $100 million. Due to the turnaround, total throughput in Tyler in the first quarter was approximately 35,000 barrels per day. Production margin in the quarter was $21.65 per barrel, and operating expenses were $8.70 per barrel, including approximately $1.25 per barrel of accelerated maintenance due to the turnaround. In the second quarter, the estimated total throughput in Tyler is in the 74,000 to 77,000 barrels per day range, and OpEx is expected to go back to the normal range of $4.50 to $5.00 per barrel. In El Dorado, total throughput in the first quarter was approximately 77,000 barrels per day. Our production margin was $13.38 per barrel, and operating expenses were $4.47 per barrel. Estimated throughput for the second quarter is in the 78,000 to 81,000 barrels per day range. In Big Spring, total throughput for the quarter was consistent with plan at approximately 73,000 barrels per day. Production margin was $18.33 per barrel, and operating expenses were $5.80 per barrel, including approximately $0.60 per barrel of maintenance activities. The estimated throughput for the second quarter is approximately 70,000 barrels per day after completing maintenance work in the month of April. In Krotz Springs, total throughput was approximately 84,000 barrels per day. Our production margin was $15.47 per barrel, and operating expenses were $5.21 per barrel, including $0.35 per barrel maintenance in our reformer and our key units. Planned throughput in the second quarter is in the 80,000 to 82,000 barrels per day range. Overall, estimated system throughput in the second quarter is in the 301,000 to 311,000 barrels per day range compared with approximately 269,000 barrels per day in the first quarter. We continue to focus on safety, reliability and environmental compliance as our top priorities, and we expect margin capture and cost performance to follow. As far as market conditions, good day to be an inland refinery in the U.S. Gasoline is tight going to the summer and, specifically for Delek, crude oil pricing dynamics are favorable and demand for products is strong across our system. I will now turn the call over to Rosy for the financial variance.

Thank you, Joseph. Starting on Slide 4. For the first quarter of 2023, Delek US had net income of $64 million or $0.95 per share. Adjusted net income was $93 million or $1.37 per share, and adjusted EBITDA was $285 million. Cash flow from operations was $395 million. On Slide 5, we provide a waterfall of our adjusted EBITDA by segment from the fourth quarter of 2022 to the first quarter of 2023. The significant improvement over last quarter was primarily from higher results in refining. As Avigal and Joseph mentioned, during the quarter, we operated well and we're positioned to capture favorable market conditions. In addition, corporate contributed a $16 million benefit over last quarter, primarily due to lower G&A costs. For your reference, we have provided a year-over-year waterfall slide in the backup. Moving to Slide 6 to discuss cash flow. We built $24 million in cash during the quarter. The $395 million in operating activities reflects the strong cash from operations. In addition, it includes approximately $180 million of the $240 million of cash associated with the two year-end timing events disclosed during the fourth quarter earnings call. Investing activities of $222 million is primarily for capital expenditures, the majority being for the Tyler refinery turnaround. Financing activities include the debt paydown during the quarter, partially offset by approximately [$60 million] (ph) cash inflow for the year-end timing events. On Slide 7, we show capital expenditures first quarter compared with our full year estimate. For 2023, capital expense will be heavily weighted to the first half of the year. We still estimate the full year to remain at approximately $350 million. Net debt is broken out between Delek and Delek Logistics on Slide 8. During the quarter, consolidated net debt improved approximately $303 million, and Delek US,…

We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] At this time, we will take our first question, which will come from Neil Mehta with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead with your question.

Yeah, thanks so much and congrats on some good progress here this quarter, and that's where I want to start off on the Refining segment. It looks like even when you adjust for the G&A, it was better captures than expected in our model, in particular, was at Krotz, but in Tyler as well. And so just curious on anything you could talk about in terms of the refining business, if you're seeing underlying improvements. And now that we're in a little bit of a tougher margin environment than where we were in Q1, do you think that strength in capture can flow through?

Hey, Neil. Good morning. It's Avigal. Thanks for the question, and thank you for the support. Yes, we have experienced a good progress with our initiatives. First of all, we had a self-reliable operation always is a key driver. And I think that the team we have is extremely focused around that. So that was the focus. The execution of the turnaround was a great success and a focus and few small projects that helped us well. That's a good opportunity for me to welcome Joseph live and allow him to give some more color around it. Please go with that, Joseph.

Hey, thank you, and good morning, Neil. Yes, the system executed well from a safety and reliability standpoint like Avigal mentioned. Throughput capture OpEx for the four refineries were in the planned range, with Tyler obviously under turnaround. We sourced our domestic crude oil efficiently with a more favorable Midland differentials and the right market structure. We blended low-cost butane in our gasoline. And then on the distillate side, we all know the jet fuel was a good capture component this quarter for all refineries, including our sales. HSD and octane price stayed well to support our capture. So good quarter all in all, and we are looking forward for the next one.

And welcome, Joseph. Thank you. And that's the follow-up. You talked a lot about the path towards sum of the parts realization, and there was no update here. So can you talk a little bit about where we stand on the plan, and what are the different things that you've ruled in and ruled out?

Hey, Neil, again, thank you. So listen, I can tell you that the team and Mark is here as well, and he can chime in after I finish. He's extremely focused on working on very extensively. We continue to make in our mind great progress, meaningful progress, but we all understand that those type of transactions take time. And more than anything, we want to get it right. We do not want to make something quick, which is not right. I'm very optimistic about that. The progress is being done very, very, very well, and we are very satisfied with it. And we'll keep you posted. I don't know, Mark, do you want to say anything?

No, I think that was well articulated. Neil, we continue to work on it. We see opportunities out there for us that we're evaluating. As I said on our fourth quarter call, the thing that we're focused on is positioning all of our businesses to pursue accretive growth and have financial flexibility. So that continues to be a focus on anything and everything we do.

Just a quick follow-up on that, Mark. Is it fair to say that the area where you see the best opportunity to unlock value is still around logistics assets? Is that what you believe the market is undervaluing?

Yeah, I think that's a fair statement, Neil. I mean, we obviously have a value benchmark sort of a marker, if you will, out there, the trades sort of every day. And we feel like that just given how we're structured right now, we're not getting adequate look through value to our midstream business.

Thanks, team.

And our next question will come from Manav Gupta with UBS. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, guys. A little bit of a follow-up here. Krotz used to be one of your weaker assets. It's clearly one of the stronger assets at this point of time. Help us understand what has changed in the last 1.5 or 2 years to make this a much more competitive asset than what it used to be?

Yeah, absolutely. Joseph, do you want to take it?

Yes, I'll start. Talking about reliability, again, Krotz is a very unique special place. It was just certified as a VPP plant. And I think the story is right there. So 1Q, we have seen a great reliability, which was reflected in our yield. In addition, we have a new catalyst and the reformer that really helps our yields and providing small gasoline components. Butane blending is very efficient at Krotz Springs, and we make a lot of jet fuel in our crude unit. So, when jet is strong and recovering, Krotz Spring is going to do well. So a great team, favorable market conditions give us good results.

And we cannot undermine the improvement of the Alky over the last few years. Krotz used to have -- to be refinery without Alky. Alky pricing was good, and we see a nice return to our investment we did years ago.

Makes sense, guys. A quick follow-up here. You mentioned a little bit of this, but it looks like you have made some improvements at Tyler at -- during the 1Q turnaround, which is giving you more confidence of a higher capture. Help us understand what was executed and what gives you confidence that the capture at Tyler will improve and make it more competitive?

Thank you, Manav. Like we said in our prepared remarks, beyond just reliability projects and the addressing risk, we have done some upgrades. I think the most significant one is a revamp of our vacuum tower, which helps the feed quality to the FCC. So the FCC is performing much better with better conversion, better yields. In addition, we replaced the catalyst in the DHT that gives us a much better liquid recovery and better swell. So we think this 1Q story is just a snapshot. We are here for -- to capture those benefits in the future. And I think personally, $0.40 is probably on the conservative side.

Perfect, guys. I'll leave it there, but I do want to say one thing. We are seeing the way you report earnings has improved a lot. There's a lot more consistency. And I think the feedback we're getting from shareholders is that this is exactly what they wanted. So all those who are involved in making it a lot more consistent and easier to understand reporting, I would like to congratulate them. Thank you.

Manav, point taken. Thank you.

And our next question will come from John Royall with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead with your question.

Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I'd also like to echo Manav's comments on the reporting. I think it's been much easier to get through on earnings days. So my first question is on capital allocation and specifically being out of the buyback market in 1Q despite a big quarter from a cash flow perspective, I assume it had to do with the turnaround, but any color on that. And then the $40 million pace for 2Q-to-date is pretty robust. Is there some catch-up there? Should we think of that as a good pace going forward? And I think $75 million to $100 million was something you had said for the full year. And maybe if you could just comment on that if that's still a good number?

Yeah. Thank you, John, for the question. Obviously, I will take a bit broader look on our capital allocation. Obviously, we cannot lose sight from the fact that we are increasing dividend for three or four quarters in a row now. So we see that dividend going through the cycle, and we are committed as much as we can to continue that through the cycle, so that's point number one. Point number two, around the buyback, we obviously wanted to make sure that we are clearing any risk from our profile this year or a major -- pretty significant risk with the Tyler turnaround behind us. And as you probably can know, we are taking ourselves as a first tier return to shareholder company, and we are there, right? You can see us there on the 19% last 12 months, which is where we want to be. We want to be very competitive and to give a good return to our investors, both on the short term and on the long term. I'm not going to change the guidance we gave today on the $75 million to $100 million. But I'm going to say that we are actively looking on that, and we are using the buyback as a flex, if I can say, it's a flex tool when we have a solid sight for margin and operation, we're still going to do it. So that's something we are keep looking at. And obviously, if something changes, we'll come back.

Great. Thanks, Avigal. And then, maybe on the cost reduction program, maybe just a little more detail on the $12 million captured of the $30 million to $40 million you expect this year? And what are the key sources of what you've captured so far and this year as a portion of the program in general?

Yeah, absolutely, John. I will let Reuven, our CFO, to comment on that, if it's fine.

Thank you, Avigal. First of all, our guidance that we gave in the fourth quarter for the year was $30 million to $40 million savings and on a run rate of $90 million to $100 million based on Q4/Q1 '24. That number is divided around 65% between OpEx and 35% between G&A. The $3 million that we have materialized in the first quarter are initiatives that we took late in the fourth quarter, early in the first quarter, and will impact obviously the run rate of $30 million to $40 million for this year. There are additional -- I mean the program goes throughout the year. We have additional segments that we're going to implement in the second quarter and in the fourth quarter. Some of them are IT related, some of them are not. The initial effort was around G&A org and structure. As we progress in the second and third quarter, it will be more focused on the operation.

Thank you.

And our next question will come from Doug Leggate with Bank of America. Please go ahead with your question.

Thank you. Thanks for taking my question. Let me add my welcome to Joe. It's nice to see you back Joe.

Thank you.

I wonder if I could just hit, first of all, Avigal, the sum of the parts question again. To the extent you can, if midstream as the -- as soon as the problem, what are the range of options that you are considering in terms of -- obviously, the balance sheet is one question mark, but how do you see that playing out to the extent you can share at this point of your review?

Yeah. So, Doug, it's a great question, but I'm not going to give too much color about that. All I'm going to say is that we have a line of sight that is going to be very accretive to both DK and DKL. And I'm sure that you're going to be very happy.

Okay. And retail, is that part of the discussion as well or not?

So, we want to tackle first what moved the needle the most, right? So we have priorities. And the priority is to do what is the most meaningful as first priority. And that's how we work here to make sure that we are being as meaningful as we possibly can with creating value to shareholders.

Understood. Just one last one on this topic. Timing, when would you expect to be able to reveal to the market your plan?

So, I'm more aggressive than you, and I want badly -- more badly than you are. So, we are on the same side of the equation. But this is not a simple plain vanilla. It requires some work and planning and detail. So, we are in the same camp, and we want it sooner than later. So, I'm optimistic.

We will watch with interest. My follow-up is maybe for Reuven, I guess, it's a housekeeping question. We already tried to walk through with Rosy, but I think it would be good for everyone to hear this. Your cash flow was obviously pretty strong, but you don't break out, at least not in the release, the working capital move. So we're trying to understand what the -- I guess the underlying cash flow was in the quarter? And more importantly, how much of the working capital is -- will reverse in the future? In other words, is this a one-time benefit, or is it something we can look to is more of an underlying improvement? So, what the underlying cash flow, I guess, is the question on the nature of the working capital.

All right. So, thank you for the question. I think the one number to remember is on the fourth quarter call, we mentioned that we had a timing issue with the intermediation agreement with Citi and $180 million are supposed to come in, in January, and they did come in. And I think that is the number that probably should be taken out of the reported number, because that was the fourth quarter event that reconciled itself in the first quarter. Other than that, what impacted the working capital cash flow was the Tyler turnaround and, on the negative side, the capital expenditure, which was higher in the first quarter as expected.

And below the operating line, Reuven?

$140 million. The difference ends up in the financing activities, right?

Yeah.

Yeah, that makes up the full $240 million.

Right.

Yeah.

Got it. Okay. Thank you so much.

Yeah, thank you. Appreciate it.

And our next question will come from Matthew Blair with Tudor, Pickering, Holt. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Joseph, it looks like southwest cracks are still at new five-year highs, whereas most other regions are roughly around five-year averages or even a little bit below. Could you talk about the drivers that are supporting the strong margin environment in the southwest? And is that something that you can capitalize on in Q2, or does the big spring maintenance in April take you out of the picture there?

Yeah, thanks for the question. Actually, we are very optimistic about what we see on the demand side. We see a strong netbacks and strong pull from our racks and the demand in our side of the world looks solid as this could be. There is a different discussion between the macro and the micro, and the micro in our inland is solid and robust, and we see that on the results.

Yeah. And if I can add, the southwest market, you're right, is probably the strongest in the country these days. And fortunately, this is where a lot of our businesses. So you can see it in the [indiscernible] Iraq versus Gulf Coast, and we capture that, and it's coming back to the refining, not through the Big Spring number, but definitely through our profitability. As far as the second quarter dynamics and I'll say specifically in Big Spring, look, we think the fundamentals are favorable from inventory standpoint, right? I mean gasoline is tight going to the summer. Global economic trends are still a concern, but we don't have a crystal ball to predict future trends. But the great thing about our system, we are well insulated within our niche markets. We have seen strong demand going into April, and the marketing uplift really reflect our location advantage. We continue to leverage our advantage the crude pricing, octane capabilities and now asphalt capabilities as we move to the second quarter.

Okay. Sounds good. And then, on the retail side, it looks like your same-store volumes were down 1.7% in Q1. Do you have a rough number on what that's looking like so far in Q2?

So, we are not going to give a forecast for Q2, but we are going to say, on the other side, merchandise was higher. So all in all, retail is doing good.

Okay. Thank you very much.

And our next question will come from Paul Cheng with Scotiabank. Please go ahead with your question.

Hey, guys. Good morning.

Good morning.

Two questions, please. One, hopefully, that's simple maybe is for Reuven. Trading and supply, in the first quarter, it's a loss of about $18 million. And last year is $105 million. Is it a [real] (ph) loss or it's just one side of the two trades that you lost on -- you report a loss there, and then you actually have the [Indiscernible] hedge gain on the other side on the physical market in the physical barrel? So just trying to understand whether it's a real loss or that is just is sort of like accounting, how you report it? If it is a real loss, what contributed the loss? The second question maybe is for Avigal that how important is M&A acquisition for your strategy over the next three years in Refining, Logistics and Retail? And if it is important? Or even if it is not, what type of financial metrics you would be using when you're looking at potential targets? Thank you.

Yeah. So Paul, with your permission, I will start with the strategic question, and then we'll talk -- we'll go to the tactics. So, M&A is obviously a tool that sells Delek in the past very successfully and very good. But M&A, we're going to do it only if we're going to be disciplined, right? And when I mean disciplined, it seems to be accretive for investors. We are not going to do M&A just to check the box. We're going to do it when it makes sense, strategic, synergetic and we can drive value to shareholder, period, end of story. That's what's going to drive us. Obviously, on the refining side, it's more accretive versus retail, which is 10x. So we're not probably going to do M&A on the retail side because it's not accretive. So that's in the strategic side, but we are obviously looking and if we'll find something that will make sense on the short term and on the long term, we were not shy about it. We were not shy about that in the past, but again, it needs to be accretive and makes sense. Around the split between refining, I don't have all the technicalities in front of me, Paul, but it's -- there is nothing weird in those -- in that. It's mainly the way we split between refining and the different assets. So I can ask Rosy to look into that and come back to you with more color. I don't have it in front of me.

Can I ask that on refining, if you do go into any acquisition, is there a particular region that you will be interested or that you are not really focusing on the region?

So again, we are not going to be specific, but I think the rules that we have, it's we need to have add value to any assets need to be accretive, and we are not going to rush ourselves, Paul. We're going to make something that's going to make sense for the long term and can bring -- and going to be accretive for our share price. So there is no rush, but if something is going to come up, we'll do it right.

Okay. Thank you.

You bet. Thank you.

Thank you, Paul.

And our next question will come from Jason Gabelman with Cowen. Please go ahead with your question.

Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions.

Good morning.

I want to first go back to capital allocation. And you paid down a lot of debt in 1Q. Does that get the parent balance sheet in an appropriate place excluding MLT debt, or do you want to pay down additional debt? And kind of on the topic of the balance sheet and capital allocation, you had previously discussed a 1:1 ratio between buybacks and debt paydown. Is that kind of the right split moving forward, or do you have a different allocation plan going forward? Thanks.

Yeah. So thank you for the question. I will start and Reuven will continue. So, on the DK side, we probably have the best balance sheet among our peers with only $200 million of debt. Most of our debt, as you well known, is on the DKL side and have a completely different level of income against it. So it's two different ball game, and we cannot lose sight out of debt. And obviously, we have very high level of third-party income. So that's the philosophy behind it. So we said in the past and we are sticking to it, especially on a higher interest environment that we are at that we will have a balanced approach between reducing debt and buyback. We demonstrated in the last four months that we are not shy of doing buyback and the market continues to be good. We will use that tool in the past -- in the future like we used it in the past. Reuven, maybe you can [indiscernible] if you want to?

Yeah. As you recall, during the fourth quarter, we had to increase our debt as a result of the intermediation agreement timing. So going into the first quarter, we had two priorities. One is to pay down back that debt. And the other one was to support the elevated capital expenditure level of the first quarter, which are mainly as a result of the Tyler turnaround. Once we realize we can accomplish that, and it's a very strong quarter, we did additional $60 million of debt from the original plan, which put us at the $300 million range. And we started the buyback program, and we bought $40 million.

Got it. And just one clarifying question on that. So going forward, do you expect to be balanced between buybacks and debt paydown, or does it swing back the other way, just given 1Q debt paydown was so high?

Yeah. So, we didn't change the philosophy. But it doesn't mean that if the market condition change, we'll not change versus what we do. As we said, the philosophy is to have a great return to shareholder, and we are a first tier around it, and we'll keep being first tier around it. So, we are taking a buyback as a priority. Obviously, interest rate is where it is. So we're going to do both as effective as we possibly can.

Okay. Understood. And my follow-up is on corporate expenses. Those came in a lot lower than expected in 1Q. What drove that? It doesn't seem like you expect that to repeat in the second quarter. So just wondering what the variance was in the first quarter. Thanks.

Yeah. Reuven, do you want to take that?

Yeah, thank you. So, it's actually a composition of three numbers. As part of our cost reduction efforts, we review every line item, and we reclassified $6 million from G&A to OpEx, which is in line with industry practices and our peers. In addition to that, there were $3 million of timing expense. And the last component, which is the $3 million that is directly related to the cost efficiency steps that we have taken late in the fourth quarter, early in the first quarter, which will impact the G&A for the remainder of the year with about $12 million.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you.

And our next question will be a follow-up from Paul Cheng with Scotiabank. Please go ahead with your follow-up.

Hey, guys. Real quick. Avigal, when you're looking at logistics, have you guys ever considered have done similar to what some of your peers start to roll up that, that two engines, that you spin it off or doing other things that actually take out minority public's unitholder? And secondly, that do you have a number you can share what is the [indiscernible] and the RIN expense in the quarter? Whether those are any meaningful number? And also that you can talk about what is your hedging strategy going forward?

Yeah. Thanks, Paul, for the follow-up. Let's start one by one. Around buying back the asset, we said that we believe that we have a good vehicle. I understand -- we understand why other peers did what we did -- what they do, and we'll come back to you again when we have something meaningful to share. we believe that we have much more accretive way for everyone going forward with that. We have seen others that did it and was not as successful as they expected. So, we have -- we believe we have a more meaningful way to do it, that's going to be better from a leverage and accretive for both to DK and DKL. Regarding the RIN, we historically didn't provide a special guidance or information around that. But this quarter, I'm sure that you are very pleased from all the new information we got. So we are moving very fast on the right direction to give a lot of clarity.

All right. Thank you.

You bet. Thank you for the question.

And that concludes our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Avigal Soreq for any closing remarks.

Yeah. So thank you, the investor, the Board of Director and mainly our employees for a great quarter and great executing. Our first priority is to have safe and reliable operations and to have a great return to shareholders, and we are committed to do so. Thank you for your time and effort. Appreciate it.

The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.