Moving on to the income statement. Net revenue was $22 million, up 4%. Transaction revenue, which is tied directly to GMV was approximately 75% of total revenue with subscriptions making up most of the remainder. Take rates declined approximately 40 basis points year-over-year due primarily to a mix shift in order value. Gross profit was $16.3 million, up 9%. Gross profit margins were 74%, up 3 percentage points year-over-year. Gross profit margins included a nonrecurring insurance recovery related to a prior shipping matter, which contributed approximately 1 percentage point to our reported margins. On an adjusted basis, gross profit margins were at the high end of our 71% to 73% guidance range. Sales and marketing expenses were $8 million, down 13%. Excluding severance charges of approximately $800,000, sales and marketing expenses were down 22%. This outcome is a direct reflection of our continued expense discipline and the strategic realignment we executed in September. We realized savings from lower personnel costs and simultaneously tightened our performance marketing efficiency thresholds. Sales and marketing as a percentage of revenue was 36%, down from 44% a year ago. Technology development expenses were $5.9 million, up 8%, driven by higher headcount-related costs due to our annual merit increases awarded in March and additional bonus awards in the quarter. As a percentage of revenue, technology development was 27%, up from 26% a year ago. General and administrative expenses were $6.4 million, down to 7% due primarily to lower headcount-related costs. As a percentage of revenue, general administrative expenses were 29%, down from 32% a year ago. Lastly, provision for transaction losses were approximately $790,000, 4% of revenue, flat year-over-year. Total operating expenses were $21 million, a 6% decrease, excluding severance cost of roughly $800,000, operating expenses were down 10%. The strategic realignment executed in September fundamentally changes our profitability equation. The estimated $7 million in annual savings structurally lowers the revenue level required for us to break even. A reduction in performance marketing spend is the largest component of these savings achieved by raising our efficiency thresholds for new consumer acquisition. This trade-off is strategic we are accepting lower traffic and lower near-term order volume in exchange for significantly higher margins and better unit economics. Adjusted EBITDA loss was approximately $240,000 compared to a loss of $3 million last year. Adjusted EBITDA margin was a loss of 1% compared to a loss of 14% a year ago.