Sure. Yes. And I think more specifically, Brandon, you were looking at where friction is out in the market in terms of you know, barriers, if you will, Um, and we talk again. We talk about what the quality of lives are, and that is that 72 million that 38%. We also talked about access, which is pathway to a prescription, and that is more like a 169 million lives. So if you look at the delta between the 2, you are gonna see that, you know, the let's call it 80 to 90 more million lives, right, that potentially have access to Amrozi might have a larger barrier, right, in terms of that friction That could be, for example, a prior auth or a double step that is in place, right? So our job is identifying where those bottlenecks are, and we have been doing that on a consistent basis. And speaking with those plans to see what it takes to get Amrozi down to sort of our benchmark, which is that quality single step therapy or better. Obviously, from a clinical perspective, we have a strong value proposition. There are other drugs obviously available to them in the market. From a rosacea, you know, treatment standpoint. And, you know, our category, again, we are saying a single step through any of those either oral or topical agents. Typically, prescribers do prescribe for a rosacea, They are using an oral, and they may also supplement with a with a topical. But again, you know, with our head-to-head data, the fact that our drug works in essentially half the time as Oracea, right, 8 weeks, we achieved the results greater than what Oracea did in our study in 16 weeks. With strong value proposition, not only from a clinical perspective, but from a financial perspective. And this is resonating very well with the payers. But this is not a very highly managed category, right, in terms of rosacea and kind of what payers have on their plates, right, when you think of GLP ones, other oncology, rare disease, orphan drugs. So, you know, it takes a little bit more time. We are having again, we have great contacts with the important plans that we think are gonna make the difference that for example, may have a double step or a PA and why we think it is not appropriate to have sort of that in place for our drug given the data and the financial profile for it. And so, yeah, I would say you know, the strict scripts that are going through with those, are still gonna continue to grow through, but they could go through at a higher rate, which, you know, covered, which is gonna improve our reimbursement if we are able to remove and reduce those barriers, and that is what we are gonna continue to do through Q3, Q3, Q4, and into 2028 as well.