Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Deckers Brands' Third Quarter Fiscal 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be provided at that time for you to queue up for questions. I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded. I'll now turn the call over to Steve Fasching, Vice President of Strategy and Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. Fasching. Steve Fasching - Vice President Strategy & Investor Relations: Good afternoon, and welcome to everyone joining us today. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone of the company's Safe Harbor policy. Please note that certain statements made on this call are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which statements are subject to considerable risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are intended to qualify for the Safe Harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements on this call other than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements. These may include statements relating to the company's anticipated financial performance, including its projected revenues, expenses, gross margin, operating margin, capital expenditure, earnings per share, and effective tax rate. These statements may also relate to the company's brand strategies, store expansion plans, inventory management systems and retailer retention policies, business transformation plans as well as the outlook for the company's markets and the demand for its products. Forward-looking statements made on this call represent our current expectations and are based on currently available information. Forward-looking statements involve numerous risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from any results predicted, assumed, or implied by forward-looking statements. The company has explained some of these risks and uncertainties in its SEC filings, including the Risk Factors section on its Annual Report on Form 10-K. Given these risks and uncertainties, listeners are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Except as required by law or the listing rules of the New York Stock Exchange, the company expressly disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking statements, whether to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations or as a result of the availability of new information. With that, I'll now turn it over to Chief Executive Officer and Chair of the Board of Directors, Angel Martinez.

Thanks, Steve, and thank you, everyone, for joining us on today's call. As you saw from our press release, it was a difficult quarter, especially from a top line perspective. Over the past few years, we've made great progress diversifying our brands and product lines and transforming our organization. However, as our business and the retail industry face new challenges, we're taking more aggressive action to accelerate our growth strategies and streamline our operating structure to become more nimble and efficient organization that can adapt effectively to changes in consumer behavior. As you'll recall our third quarter outlook was predicated on seasonal conditions for the period. Instead, December temperatures in our key markets around the world were at or near record highs, leading to a decrease in demand for cold weather product. On top of this the retail industry experienced soft store traffic. We believe some of the decline in traffic was tourist driven, as the U.S. dollar continued to strengthen against most major currencies. It also appeared that the steep discounting many retailers offered in early November led to an early start of the holiday season, which lessened the significance of the weeks leading up to Christmas. For the quarter net sales were $796 million, or $813 million on a constant currency basis, an increase of 3.6% over last year. EPS for the quarter was $4.78 on a reported basis and $5.11 in constant currency, which represents growth of over 13%. Our bottom line benefited from lower than expected SG&A expenses and the lower than expected tax rate. Despite the shortfall versus our guidance, there were several highlights from the quarter that reinforce our confidence in the strategic direction of the company. Starting with UGG, we continue to see strong consumer response to our casual and fashion boot offerings,…

Thanks, Angel. Hello, everyone. As we look deeper into our recent performance and at the changes we are making, we see a great opportunity to further evolve UGG into a stronger, more diversified lifestyle brand and expand our marketplace position. I'm excited to share with you how we will begin to execute this in fall 2016. But first, I'll begin with a review of the third quarter and how our performance is impacting the fourth quarter. While our third quarter was challenging, it produced valuable insights that we are implementing into our go-forward strategies. The performance of our fashion and casual boots, which sold well, and the positive reaction to the launch of the Classic Slim validated our belief that consumers are looking for more innovation from the UGG brand. The shortfall in sales versus our Q3 guidance was driven by our Classics and cold weather product, particularly in the month of December. Sales in December were soft as temperatures across all of our regions reached record or near-record highs. In response to the sluggish start to the month, combined with the fact that we are introducing new Classics featuring improved traction, comfort, and water-resistant treatment in fall 2016, we decided to promote the Classic tall, short, and mini. This promotion drove higher sell-through. However, it wasn't enough to overcome the combination of a strong dollar, general retail malaise, and warm weather. We simply did not see the sales acceleration that normally occurs in the weeks leading up to Christmas. And we also experienced a higher than expected level of cancellations in December and weaker than planned store comps. For the quarter, DTC comps were down 1% but up 1.6% excluding our five major tourist locations in the U.S. Turning to the fourth quarter, the weakness we experienced and the…

Thanks, Dave, and good afternoon, everyone. Before I begin my review, I want to highlight that Steve Fasching, who you heard from at the start of today's call, was recently promoted to Vice President Strategy and Investor Relations. Steve has been an integral member of our financial leadership team since joining the company four years ago, and I'm confident he will continue to excel in his elevated role. Now to our results, starting with revenue, on a constant currency basis for the quarter, revenue increased 3.6% to $813 million. On a reported basis, revenue increased 1.4% to $796 million. Gross margin was 49.1% in the third quarter compared to 52.9% last year. The change in gross margin was driven by greater than planned promotional activities combined with 110 basis point impact from FX headwinds caused by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. All the Q3 markdown impact is reflected in our Q3 results, and we do not anticipate any further impact. We continued to show SG&A leverage with third quarter SG&A as a percent of sales at 23.7% compared to 25.6% a year ago. The improvement in SG&A was primarily due to the reduction of performance-based compensation and other sales variable expenses, partially offset by $5 million in store impairments. We remain on track to deliver leverage in fiscal 2016, even with our reduced sales outlook. Our third quarter tax rate was 21.8%, favorable compared to our guidance of 27%. The main driver of this change was the mix of earnings across regions, with domestic business being reduced in proportion to the total company in the third quarter. While this was lower than we planned, it does not reflect our future tax rate expectations. For the quarter, we reported earnings per share of $4.78 versus $4.50 a year ago, which…

Thanks, Tom. And thank you to everyone for joining us today. Our organization has undergone a lot of changes over the past few years, and I'd like to acknowledge and thank our employees for their hard work and the tenacity with which they take on new challenges. It is their ability to embrace and adapt to change that gives me great confidence in our future success. And with that let me turn it over to the operator for Q&A. Operator?

Thank you. At this time we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. Our first question comes from the line of Randy Konik from Jefferies. Please proceed with your question.

Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question, I really appreciate it. Couple questions just real quick. Can you talk about the store closures a little bit, give us more flavor there? You talked about identifying 20 stores I guess. Is there any commonality on what comprises those 20 stores? Are they in certain types of city versus non-city locations or something like that? Can you get any color there? Can you elaborate on – it sounded like you said that in markets where there was temperate climate, like it sounded like California, the sales were, I don't know if you'd call it strong, but in line with expectations. Can you just give us a little more color there? And then lastly, when should we expect the restructuring – or with the SG&A savings, how is that – when is that going to actually hit the income statement? Is that something that we should expect start to occur in the back part of fiscal 2016? How am I supposed to think about when those expense savings – because you give us an annualized number, when those expense savings hit the income statement? Thank you.

Hey, Randy. This is Dave. I'll tackle the first two, and then I hand it over to Tom for the third piece of your question. With regard to the store closing philosophy, there is some commonality that we've looked at across the fleet of stores and the roughly 20 stores that we've identified. And it really comes down to, based on current trends and future outlook, stores that are performing below our threshold of 20% return on sales. But in addition to that stores that we don't believe represent our strategic focus going forward and necessarily in locations that are in line with our strategy of elevating the brand in key cities globally. So it's grouped under those two areas. And it's something we've been monitoring for a while. And with the results in the last quarter, we just felt it was the right time to accelerate that focus, as we continue to optimize our fleet.

And generally speaking these are freestanding stores. They're not mall-based stores.

Correct.

And a lot of the locations have been impacted pretty significantly by a lack of tourism.

Yeah. And the other thing to keep in mind is a lot of these stores are legacy older locations, where quite frankly traffic has just migrated to other parts of the city. With regards to the comment about cooler weather in key markets, particularly on the West Coast, we did see better results in our West Coast stores because of the cooler than normal trends that we've been seeing in places like California. So comparatively speaking where we saw weather that was more advantageous to cold weather product versus the other rest of the regions and around the globe, we did see better performance than the areas where it was warmer across all categories.

Randy, this is Tom. Of the $35 million of savings, just to add to that, it's not all – that's not all retail stores. Of the $35 million about $20 million, $25 million is retail stores. And the balance of savings we would expect from Sanuk and Teva. But to be real clear...

Sanuk and Ahnu.

Sanuk and Ahnu, excuse me. To be real clear, that is an annualized rate. It's going to take some time to get to that $35 million. So we won't achieve all that savings in the new fiscal year. A lot of it's going to be a function...

Okay. Thanks very much.

...of stores closed.

Oh – so I mean do you think that's two quarters to three quarters away?

It's too early to tell. We really need to go through the store closings, because as I said most of the savings is store closings, and that's a big function when we get those closed. Store closings, there's some science there. You don't want to rush into them too quick and incur too big of charges upfront. So we're also at the same time trying to mitigate some of our cash charges.

Yeah.

So we'd rather carve the right balance of closing them over time over the course of the year. So just to be clear, it's not all that $35 million in savings will be in this year.

Understood. Thank you.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Omar Saad from Evercore ISI. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good afternoon. Hey, I wanted to ask, given kind of how the calendar fourth quarter, fiscal third quarter played out at retail, and the inventories you have and are in the channel still. How do you think about the transition from this winter season into the next year, where you are launching kind of the new kind of reimagined core Classic product? Is that going to postpone that? Or change the way you think about that and how you market that and how you position the brand in the marketplace accordingly? Thanks.

Yeah. Great question, Omar. This is Dave. So a couple things. With regards to the past quarter, Classics as a total from a unit perspective were down in sales prior year. But the key thing to remember is that the core Classics is now less than a quarter of our total business. And so when we were going into the quarter with the promotions that we had pulled in the middle of Q3, we adjusted inventory levels in the back end to help us get out of that inventory. So the promotions, accelerating those a little bit earlier allowed us to be much cleaner coming out of Q3 and Q4. And we don't see any major issues with transitioning out of the core Classic and the Bailey Bow and the Bailey Buttons to make room for the new updated Classic that will come in in July. So the way we see it right now, we'll be pretty clean in the market. We'll have leftover core Classics to sell through our outlets next fall, which will be good for that business. And then in wholesale and full price DTC, we'll transition into new Classic in July. I think it's also important to note, as I said, the core Classic now roughly less than a quarter of our total business and non-core Classic 75% of our business. In Q3, those non-core Classics unit sales was up mid-teens, particularly in weather and casuals boots, despite some of the challenges we had. And I think this is a good way to think about our business going forward where core Classics becomes less and less meaningful. It will still be important but the real conversation is about the new product that we brought to the market and the strength of that business going forward, which is in line with our long-term diversification strategies. And I think updating the Classic is just going to make that franchise stronger. But it's not the only conversation, going forward.

Got you, got you. And then, could you talk a little bit more detail around how you're going to be segmenting the market a little more at the retail level? And it sounds like maybe you're going to clean up some of the distribution. Are we reading that right? Any more information on that would be helpful, thanks.

Yeah, I'm really excited about this. This is something that I think has been an opportunity for us for quite a while. And essentially, the way I would think about is, if you think the pyramid of distribution in our key markets, our goal is to elevate the brand closer to the top of the pyramid through DTC and key wholesale accounts that truly represent the best of the brand, treat our consumers and their consumers in a real high quality way from a service perspective, and showcase the brand the way we feel is right for our brand positioning. So what that essentially means is we're going to take more care working with some of these top key retailers, and how we showcase the brand, and how we differentiate product for them, so they have special product, and then working throughout the distribution network to make sure that each level of distribution has the right product for their consumer and their positioning. As we look across the marketplace, we also feel that there are some existing accounts that don't necessarily represent the best of the brand. And we are taking a look at those to see if they will make the cut going forward.

We now have some pretty important data points that indicate that retailers who really paid attention to what we're doing, followed our advice and diversified the product offering had a much more successful season, in spite of the weather, than those who were predominantly classic-oriented, classic-driven. So we now have all of the data points we need to make a very strong argument about that, with a lot of proof about that. So it's really now time to elevate the entire market into the right direction for the long term.

Yeah, I would also add, Omar, that with the new category leadership, with Jennifer Somer and Rob Koenen and the brand team focused on each of these individual categories, you're going to see a much more intensified focus from a category perspective, in key accounts across the marketplace. So dedicated focus on men's and expanding distribution, quality distribution in men's, same with kids and lifestyle products, while we continue to elevate and diversify the women's business as well. I think it's going to be – you're going to see a different brand in the future.

Great. Thanks for your help. Good luck.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Taposh Bari from Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question. Taposh Bari - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Hey, guys, good afternoon. I guess the question on...

Hi, Taposh. Taposh Bari - Goldman Sachs & Co.: How are you, Angel? On the discounting this past holiday, so obviously, some unprecedented promotions for the UGG brand. Curious to get your perspective on how the customer responded to the discounting activity, and how the retailers responded in particular? I know that there's obviously a negotiation around who eats and how the economics of that discount are shared. But I'd love to better understand the postmortem on how that played out versus your expectations. And also, how you're thinking about promotions going forward for fall, winter of 2017 – sorry, fall, winter of 2016? Thanks.

Yeah. Going into the quarter, obviously, this is something that the brand hadn't experienced before and hadn't planned before. And as we mentioned in the last call and some of the conversations, we were planning on transitioning the Classics assortment. So the strategy played into a big part of the decision to drive these markdowns. As we said, the Bailey Bow and Bailey Button was part of that strategy and accelerating the core Classics in the last few weeks of December. I would say, it was the right thing for the brand to be able to clear that inventory. There were some nervousness in our wholesale accounts as to what it was going to mean. But ultimately, for the most part, what it did is it helped accelerate sales for our key accounts and help give them a better inventory position which made the marketplace healthier overall and it puts us in a better position going forward to have less liability out there in the marketplace as we transition into the new classic. If we hadn't taken these markdowns, we would've been looking at a different top line sales number. And I think the upside that we saw from those promotions in our DTC channels was significant. Going forward, with regards to comping these promotions, we do not plan on comping these promotions, we don't plan on becoming a promotional brand. But that said, we are going to have to play in the competitive marketplace and be a little bit more planful in how we plan our margins and manage inventory but we're getting better at that. And the other good benefit of the discounting is we've got more consumers into the brand, which is something we talked about in the last couple of calls as well. So strategically, I feel really good about the decision and I think it benefit us for the long-term. And with regards to our key accounts and partnerships, gave them accelerated sales when they needed it and helped them get cleaner on their inventories. Taposh Bari - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Thanks for that, Dave. And then, Tom, a quick one for you on the outlook. What's driving the lower revenue guidance for the fourth quarter? Is it strictly UGG or is it also the timing or the actual revenues associated with the non-UGG brands? And then as we think about next year, last quarter you had spoken about UGG or pure and other supply chain initiatives helping the gross margin line by about 100 basis points and the hope for SG&A leverage, is that still the plan? And I guess, how are you thinking about orders next year and when do you expect to have more visibility into how the revenue outlook shakes out for 2017? Thanks.

For the fourth quarter, it's a combination of things. We're just taking a more cautious outlook for not only the UGG brand but also the other brands, as well as our Direct-to-Consumer business, because we just think that's the appropriate way to handle it, the guidance for the fourth quarter at this point in time. As far as next year, it's very early in our planning process. We're still very early in the pre-booking process and that obviously is a big input into our overall planning for next year. Now some of the things we're thinking about are some more conservative planning for the weather-sensitive product. We need to realize there's still going to be pressure on Direct-to-Consumer because of the dollar and the tourism. The Direct-to-Consumer business, the impact from the retail store closures, and we do feel that we'll have continued growth in e-commerce and HOKA. For gross margins, we still feel sheepskin should get about 100 bps, a benefit there. That said, this early stage we need to be cautious about continued pressure from reduced store counts and the non-UGG brands, the growth we get there that puts some pressure on gross margin. And the changing retail landscape, because of all the promotional environment. On the SG&A side, we talked about, on an annualized basis, the $35 million of savings but that's going to take a while. That won't all happen fiscal year in 2017 and we want to reinvest some of that, especially when we're looking at still evaluating some additional marketing money for HOKA and UGG. And the budgets aren't finalized so we really can't make a call at this point in time on overall SG&A. And another thing to keep in mind to think about next year, we expect tax to be a pretty good headwind this year, vis-à-vis what the rate was and what the rate is going to end up being this year.

Yeah. I would just add onto that, Taposh, is I think that from my perspective at least, the brands are very healthy. All the brands in the portfolio, especially with the new focus we have on them going forward and the refreshed point of view from the UGG brand, stronger than they've ever been. But I think the macro headwinds that we've all seen across the marketplace, not just Deckers, but across all brands and retailers, we don't really see those subsiding for a while. And we're planning, even though we feel really confident in the brands that we want to be a little more conservative until we see turnaround in things like the dollar and tourism and just in general market malaise to retail. So the confidence within our brands is high, but just being realistic with the macro headwinds. Taposh Bari - Goldman Sachs & Co.: Understood. Best of luck.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Corinna Van der Ghinst from Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. Hi. Good afternoon, guys. I was wondering if you, guys, could give us any just update around pricing on the new Classics 2 product or general thoughts around ASPs for the upcoming year.

Yeah. I think on the core Classic, or the updated core Classic, you're going to see similar retails to the previous ones. But if you look at the broader mix of Classics, you still have the Classic Slim was at a higher price point and it's going to be a much more significant piece of the total. The Classic Luxe will be more significant than it was last year and the Classic Street, which is a new introduction, will be comparable price points as well. So ASPs for next year across the Classics franchise should be flat to higher especially comping some of the promotions and I think that is because of better – gives us a better mix of variety and style and price points in that franchise as a whole.

Okay. Great. And then I know you guys mentioned that some of the fashion and casual products were some highlights throughout the quarter. And I was just wondering how that – how those segments performed versus your original plan going into the quarter. And then also just any color on men's, kids, and Europe in the quarter, please. Thanks.

Yeah. So the non-core Classics performed very well. Weather was up over 100%. Casuals was up over 25%, 30%. And I would say, from a sell-through perspective, they were strong. What we didn't see is the increased purchase in season on cold weather product that we had bought into in case the weather was colder than expected. But with regards to what we sold in and sell through of some of that new casual product and rain boots which is part of our weather category, as expected or better than expected sell-through, we just didn't see the uptick in the cold weather product, in the winter product that we normally see.

The men's was up about 26%, which is very significant. Our slipper business was up 16% or so. Fashion was up over 25%. So we did have great performance from this non-core product which is a strategy that we've been striving toward and moving to over the last few years as you know.

Great. Thank you.

Yep.

Our next question comes from the line of Camilo Lyon from Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good afternoon, guys. Just on the inventory composition, can you help us understand what the difference is between the December 31 UGG inventory and where it stands today? We've been hearing that there's another round of clearing out of product at retail, given the cold weather that we had in January. I'm wondering if that had helped your business as well. And then, just, if you could disaggregate what the spring inventory composition is in that number, relative to the Classic inventory that you will be carrying over into outlets next season. Steve Fasching - Vice President Strategy & Investor Relations: Yeah. So this is Steve, Camilo. On the inventory – basically, what we've said – and it might help if I give a little bit of background – so, we've been talking about this year carrying elevated levels of inventory over last year, because, as you'll recall, last year, we had low levels, and actually missed out on sales in Q4. So knowing that – and we've talked about it in the last couple of quarters about carrying really elevated inventory in terms of weather product, including cold weather slippers and casual boots. So if you look at the guidance that we gave, which we kind of said, at 12/31, we'd be up in line with sales, which would indicate kind of more like a $320 million number, and where we ended was a $371 million, so roughly $50 million of kind of increased inventory at 12/31 versus what we expected. The bulk of all that increase was really cold weather product, some slippers and some casual boot. And the good news, if there's good news in that, is really that that's carryover product. So that's product we feel we can carry over into fall of 2016, really without taking any margin impact on that. So we're comfortable carrying that over to fall. To your point, as some of the weather has turned cold, we'll see some of that inventory move. But the other is, with that being carryover product, we're able to adjust our buys over the summer. So we've already reduced buys of those categories. So we think that inventory gets in line really by the end of summer, which is our Q2 fiscal 2017.

Great. That's helpful. And then my follow-up question – it's a multi-part question. So trying to understand you're bringing great innovation to the line across the Classics business. And you're increasing the weather and the fashion component as well. But you also face obviously the weather headwinds. How are the discussions going on with your retail partners, trying to embrace the innovation, but safeguard against the weather unknowns, as it relates to fall 2016? And are you still taking the stance to further reduce the exposure to your core Classics in the backlog to the same magnitude as you did this prior season?

Yeah, good question. We're still in the middle of sorting that out. It's still early in the pre-book season for us. Essentially, what I would say is you're going to see a migration more towards casual boots, because of the success there has been strong. And I would say just more a consistent level of investment in Classics going forward, meaning core Classic. So I think that what I like about the future for us and how the conversations are going is it's a much more balanced assortment. It starts to get a little less cold weather dependent. But fortunately for us key retailers have seen the success in the non-core and non-weather products such as the casual boots. And I think you're going to see a continued migration in a positive way to those new categories, while still maintaining a healthy core business along with it. I think the...

And if I could just sneak one in – sorry, go ahead.

No, I was going to say the good news in this is we will be less reliant on one item to make the season for us going forward.

Okay. And then just a clarification on the segmentation strategy. Is that to suggest that there is going to be – in the context of also rationalizing some of the non-brand supporting distribution. Is that to suggest that there is going to be net reduction in doors of distribution, flat, or increase in doors of distribution next year?

It's probably too early to give you color on that. Stefano [Caroti] and the teams are out working on that right now, so I'd say by the end of our next call we can have more detail on that.

Okay. Thanks very much. Good luck.

Thanks.

Our next question comes from the line of Rafe Jadrosich from Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Please proceed with your question.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. So you mentioned the excess inventory you're carrying forward into next year. Can you just talk about sort of the levers you have to clear through that by the fiscal second quarter of 2017? And then how that might impact the brand? Steve Fasching - Vice President Strategy & Investor Relations: Yeah. This is Steve again, Rafe. It's – so the product that we talked about, that excess that I was talking about, that's really product that we will carry next fall. So the opportunity that we have is to really reduce our buys, which we've already done. So some of the non-carryover of inventory that we have, we're working through that in the current quarter. The carryover product that we know we'll be carrying again in fall, we've already reduced those buys. That's why the inventory comes in line by the end of summer, because that's material typically we manufacture over the summer and take delivery by late summer.

Yeah. And the other non-carryover product is good product that we can sell in our outlet store and help that business as well. So there's not a lot of liability sitting out there. It's good product that, as Steve said, is going to help our business in the fall. And we'll wind that down. And then a lot of that clearance is fuel for the outlets.

Got it. And then on the mid-teens operating margin goal for longer term, can you just give some color on what sort of the drivers are to that? Like how much of it is gross margin versus SG&A? Should we be thinking it's more SG&A now going forward with the new initiatives?

It's still early in the planning process. That said we're going to continue to work on our operating expense savings and efficiencies within the organization, not only our back room kind of initiatives and savings, but also just how we run the business on a global basis and continue to look at product design and development, trying to gain more efficiencies there. And at the same time we're going to continue. On the gross margin side we have a lot of initiatives in place and a lot of visibility around further initiatives there that can help our input costs, not only with factories but also materials and SKU rationalization and more SKU efficiency. So there's a lot of different factors that make us comfortable that we can still drive for a mid-teens operating margin in the long run.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Howard Tubin from Guggenheim Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Hey, guys. Thanks. Maybe from a – if we look back this season from a marketing perspective, maybe give us some color on which one of your programs and which programs you think were most successful/ And what should we expect to see from a marketing point of view for the UGG brand going forward into 2016?

Yeah. Great question, Howard. We learned a lot this past quarter from a marketing perspective. A couple things I could highlight. The Luxe launch, which was a very targeted launch for us early in the season on a singular item with the right level of creative, I would say was very successful. And we learned that we can really put some power behind the launches with a – what I would say, a more robust campaign but very focused on a consumer and a positioning in product. The other thing that we learned, which you're going to see more going forward, is that our consumer is trying to understand how to wear our product. And so the partnership we did with Rachel Zoe where we showcased how to style the product and use our social channels to bring that content to the consumer was very effective, particularly when we launched the Slim campaign, the umbrella of big launches was also very successful for us and that was in line with what Rachel Zoe did in showcasing that product. So, going forward, you're going to see a more concerted effort on storytelling, on big launches, and on more, what I would say, real and authentic creative versus glossy fashion shoe creative, bringing our consumers into the conversation, using generated content and really talking about the benefits of the product and how to wear our product from a style perspective.

Great. Thank you.

Yep.

Our next question comes from the line of Jonathan Komp from Robert W. Baird. Please proceed with your question. Jonathan R. Komp - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. (Broker): Yeah. Hi. Thank you. Maybe, Tom, just first to follow up on the fourth quarter guidance, I think you mentioned lower DTC assumptions as one of the factors supporting the lower guidance. I just wanted to reconcile, I think you also said you'd seen a pickup in DTC in January, so is it just that you're expecting softer trends during the balance of the quarter or maybe if you could just clarify the fourth quarter guidance for that part?

Yeah. I think January is helpful, but then the rest of the quarter tails off pretty quickly. So we want to just make sure we're cautious in the outlook there. So, that's it. Jonathan R. Komp - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. (Broker): Okay. Got it. Thank you. And then looking forward to 2017, I understand it's early, I guess you talked kind of directionally about a number of headwinds and tailwinds with the closures and a number of other pressures on the business maybe offset by some of the new marketing and product initiatives that you have. When you sit here today and kind of roll all those factors up, do you think 2017 can be a year that you grow the UGG brand revenue? Or do you think that the headwinds will be too much for that to happen?

I think it's just still too early in the process. There's just too many moving parts too early in the process to throw out. And we gave you the assumptions in the areas that we're looking at and the different levers we have and the different elements we're addressing, but it's just still too early to make a call on a lot of this.

Yeah, I think part of that is we feel confident in our offense for the back half of this coming year, but a lot of it depends on retailers that are just finishing their fiscal year and understanding what their plans for open to buy are going to be going forward. They're trying to understand the impacts of the weather to their retail locations and on their consumer. And what it means for their open to buy and the mix of brands. So the conversations we've been having with our accounts are positive. We feel very confident in our go-forward plan, but I think people are still trying to understand what the macro level issues are and how they adapt to it. Jonathan R. Komp - Robert W. Baird & Co., Inc. (Broker): Okay. Understood. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Mitch Kummetz from B. Riley. Please proceed with your question. Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: Yeah. Thanks. Maybe to start with just a follow-up on Jon's first question about DTC. I know you're being more conservative, but what is the comp assumption? I mean are you expecting negative mid-single-digits or what's the number? I was hoping you could provide that?

Negative mid-single-digits.

Q4?

Q4. Yeah, yeah. Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: All right. And then, Tom, towards the end of your prepared remarks – I don't know if I just, if I didn't hear you correctly, I thought you said something about – I know you expect over time the restructuring to save you $30 million in SG&A. But I thought you said something about a pre-tax income reduction of $20 million to $30 million? Did I hear that correctly, or what exactly was that, or...?

Yeah, Mitch, what that was is a separate item, and that is an estimate of the one-time charges we expect from our... Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: Okay.

...brand realignment and the store closures. Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: Got it. Okay. All right. And then – maybe two last quick ones. How are you guys going to manage the Classic, the new Classic inventory in the back half? I know it was – you kind of change the way you do that this year by steering the retailers more towards fashion casual weather stuff. And you kind of back-stopped them by holding the inventory and making it available for in-season order. I mean are you going to kind of maintain that philosophy going into fall 2016? Or are you not going to do that and ask them to pre-book more of that than you did this past year?

Yeah, I think generally speaking, Mitch, we're going to be conservative with core Classic inventories going forward. I think as we continue to try to migrate the consumer to other areas of the business, make sure that we're not over-distributed with the core Classics and the new launch of that, and create some excitement and demand. So we're not going to over-buy based on upside. We're going to plan it what we think the right level is. And if we have to chase some sales, I'd rather be in the position of chasing sales than have too much out there when we launch it. Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: Okay. And then lastly, on the store closings. I know that the timing's difficult to know. But there is any urgency to try to get these stores closed before the first fiscal quarter, which, if I'm not mistaken, tends to be a pretty big loss quarter for you guys? And I think a lot of that has to do with the stores being, I don't know, maybe – I don't want to say unprofitable, but being a headwind kind of to that quarter?

Yeah, Tom can jump in here. But generally speaking, we're in negotiations with landlords globally. It's a pretty complex task, and that's why we have a retail consultant helping us out to validate our assumptions and help us work through this. And it really comes down to looking at each individual lease, when these leases come up for renewal. And they're different, obviously, in every location. So what we're trying to do is get as many as we can into the rest of FY 2016 into Q4. But it all depends on how fast we can get these negotiations going. It certainly benefits us to get more into FY 2016 so we're cleaner going into FY 2017. But we won't have true visibility to what that number is until we get through the next couple of months of negotiations. Mitch Kummetz - B. Riley & Co. LLC: Got it. Thank you.

Yeah.

Our next question comes from the line of Erinn Murphy from Piper Jaffray. Please proceed with your question. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Great. Thanks. Good afternoon. Just a couple for me. I guess, first, just on the global pricing strategy. Dave, could you just talk about China in particular? You took your pricing down a couple of quarters ago. How has the consumer response been so far? And then are there any other regions that you need to sharpen a little bit further?

Yeah. It's interesting. The initial price reductions in China going up in through November were very positive. There was a little bit of reduction in ASP, obviously, across the board, but their revenue was strong. And where we saw headwinds was the same with the rest of our markets in December due to weather. So the positive impact that we expected from price reductions we've got, but it was offset in the back half and end of the quarter by the weather challenges.

And as far as the rest of the other products in the market around the world, the new innovation and new product allows us to enter those – enter product into those markets that's more price-appropriate. So we're not so dependent on Classic yet. A lot of the new product that's coming in is priced at a more accessible level and that's in the total mix. We now have a much broader price assortment for consumers and whereas in the beginning when we first started selling in those markets, everything was Classic dependent.

Yeah. Exactly. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): And you feel pretty good about the health of the Classic pricing in markets like Japan and Europe?

Yeah, we do. And as we said last quarter, we raised prices slightly in Europe and that didn't have the negative impact. It was fine. The Slim introduction was priced right. The Luxe introduction was priced right for that market, same in Japan and China and North America. So I think we're in pretty good shape going forward. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Got it. And then just if I can, on the Koolaburra brand, can you just talk a little bit more about your strategic view at the point? And then just how do you assess the timeline of ramping that to be more of a commercial product across the globe?

Yeah. I'm pretty optimistic for the long-term opportunities in Koolaburra. We've been working with some select key accounts, sizable accounts for a launch this fall and the goal there is to keep back of house and internal operations lean and also keep our account base lean. So big box footwear chains is a primary focus right now. So we don't – we haven't opened this up to independents and we're going to launch with the big guys so we can get the broadest reach as soon as we can with a minimal overhead to manage that business in the short-term and then ramp it from there. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): And, I mean, is that something that you – we should start to anticipate as we get into the back half of calendar 2016 or how do you see that kind of big box guys responding to the ramp there?

The conversations have been positive, very receptive. A lot of excitement around the products and not necessarily just the core product but more of the Koolaburra fashion product. They feel that the quality, the styling, the price is very competitive. But it's still early. We haven't finalized any of those conversations with any of those key partners yet. So we'll have color on that at the next call. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Okay. And then, just last, just going back to one of Omar's questions on just wholesale rationalization. I mean, does that imply that you are pulling back on the independent channel? And then just remind us, how big is that channel for you guys today? Thanks.

Well, the independent channel is important and critical for us, and always will be for all of our brands. And I'm not in a position to say what the new makeup of that channel's going to be, because again, it's still early. There's two goals there. One is to have our independents buy a broader assortment of the brand. And that means buying men's and kids, as well as just women's and beyond just core Classics. So there's an opportunity for us there. And also, making sure that the ones that aren't necessarily productive from a use, spend of time and return on sales for us and also, how the brand shows up, those are the ones we're having conversations with regards to potentially closing those doors. But it's still very early in the conversation, and I wouldn't feel comfortable committing to any numbers yet. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Got it. Fair enough. And then – sorry, if I could just go back to the Koolaburra question, just in terms of the channels with the majors, should we assume it's more of the Macy's, not the existing partners that you are selling into UGG, so it will be differentiated by what you're already selling with the UGG brand?

Yeah. No, that's a good thing to clarify, Erinn. It will be very different segmentation distribution than the UGG brand. And that is purposeful, strategic, and think of people like Famous Footwear versus a Nordstrom. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Got it. And the price point differential, again?

Below $100 (62:33) for Koolaburra, and you know the UGG pricing. Erinn E. Murphy - Piper Jaffray & Co (Broker): Yeah, absolutely. Thank you.

There are no further questions at this time. I'd now like to turn the conference back over to management for any closing remarks.

Well, clearly, it was a difficult quarter, but I think you've seen and heard from this conversation that we're taking aggressive action to streamline our business and further consolidate around the opportunity that we have to continue to grow revenue and earnings. We feel that, in the long run, shareholders will benefit from the power of the brands, and very optimistic about the future, and all of the talent that we have that's all pulling on the same rope to make things happen. So thank you all for being on the call, and I appreciate your time.

Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude tonight's teleconference. Thank you for your time and participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful rest of your day.