Greetings, and welcome to the Easterly Government Properties First Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to introduce your host, Lindsay Winterhalter, VP of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Before the call begins, please note the use of forward-looking statements by the company on this conference call. Statements made on this call may include statements which are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking. The company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the Safe Harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Act Reform of 1995, and is making the statement for the purpose of complying with those Safe Harbor provisions. Although, the company believes that its plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these plans, intentions, expectations or strategies will be attained or achieved. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the company’s control, including without limitation, those contained in Item 1A, Risk Factors, of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2019, and in its other SEC filings. The company assumes no obligations to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additionally, on this conference call, the company may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as funds from operations and cash available for distribution. You can find a tabular reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable current GAAP numbers in the company’s earnings release and separate supplemental information package on the Investor Relations page of the company’s website at ir.easterlyreit.com. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Darrell Crate, Chairman of Easterly Government Properties.

Thank you, Lindsay. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for this first quarter conference call. Today, in addition to Lindsay, I'm joined by Bill Trimble, the company's CEO; and Meghan Baivier, the company's CFO and COO. This quarter marks the four-year anniversary of Easterly Government Properties as a publicly traded REIT. We continue to execute with discipline, the same thesis under which we launched our private equity funds, build a portfolio of leases, backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, comprise of facilities of mission-critical agencies or those that are meaningful in the hierarchy of an agency mission. We scale the company achieving diversification for our shareholders by buying quality buildings and we have rejected many high-cap rate buildings that will not hold their NAV a decade from now. Our economic formula is simple, we set a medium to long-term target of delivering a 7% annual total return to shareholders, we anticipate a dividend of approximately 4.5% to 5% as a base and add to that NOI accretion of approximately 2% per annum. That growth will come from accretive deployment of capital in acquisitions, non-speculative development opportunities and the renewal of existing leases. This growth vehicle has been supported by a prudent balance sheet with balanced duration between assets and liabilities, unencumbered assets and reasonable total debt-to-enterprise value ratios. We believe there's considerable value in the balance sheet, given our cash flows and leases are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. This business plan, given our current stock price, provides a return to investors equivalent to the 10-year treasury plus approximately 450 basis points. We can easily imagine that spread to decrease, as investors fully digest the power and consistency of the model over the coming years.…

Thanks, Darrell, and good morning. Thank you for joining us for our first quarter earnings call. I would like to begin by highlighting the company's achievements in the first quarter 2019. This quarter we closed the final three properties in our previously announced 14-property portfolio. With these properties, we've conclude a multistage acquisition which was broken into three separate tranches over the latter half of 2018 and two early 2019. As a reminder, this portfolio had a combined acquisition value of $430 million and that's comprised of high-quality buildings that closely mirror the profile of our existing assets. The acquired portfolio consists of approximately 1.5 million square feet of rentable space 99% of which is leased with a weighted average lease expiration year of 2022. We feel the shortened duration provides us with a tremendous opportunity to capture attractive re-leasing spreads in the near term. Additionally, 79% of the assets are a build-to-suit construction, meaning the design and functionality of the building was constructed to meet the specific needs of the underlying tenants. We're happy to report that now that we have all of the 14 properties under Easterly management, these buildings are performing very well and meeting the everyday missions of the underlying tenant agencies. Operations are going even better than expected in our underwriting affording us a nice opportunity to add the overall attractiveness of this portfolio. Turning to acquisitions. Easterly is very pleased to see such a robust pipeline of actionable targets in 2019. We are constantly betting opportunities to ensure the overall quality of our portfolio remains strong. While we have mentioned, there are portfolios totaling approximately $2 billion we think 2019 will be a year of incremental growth through the acquisition of one or two bull's eye facilities at a time. Steady growth is what…

Thank you, Bill. Today I will review our current portfolio, discuss our first quarter results, provide an update on our balance sheet and capital market activities, and discuss our 2019 guidance. Additional details regarding our first quarter results can be found in the company's first quarter earnings release and supplemental information package. GAAP measures and reconciliations of non-GAAP measures discussed on this call have been provided in our supplemental. As of March 31st, we owned 65 operating properties comprising approximately 5.6 million square feet of commercial real estate with two additional properties under development totaling 129,000 square feet. The weighted average remaining lease term for our portfolio was 7.3 years. Remarkably the portfolio had nearly the same weighted average remaining lease term in the first quarter of 2015 when the company IPO-ed. While four years have passed, the company's renewal success and accretive acquisitions have allowed us to maintain the duration of our assets which speaks to the enduring visibility of our cash flows. The weighted average age of our portfolio has also defied the passage of time and remained young at 13 years. Portfolio occupancy remained at 100% and finally 99% of our annualized lease income continues to be backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government. For the first quarter, net loss per share on a fully diluted basis was $0.01. FFO per share on a fully diluted basis was $0.31. FFO as adjusted per share on a fully diluted basis was $0.29 and our cash available for distribution was $18.5 million. This represents an impressive 52% growth in cash from the first quarter last year. The portfolio has grown from 46 to 65 properties in which this scale comes a more diversified stream of cash flow supporting the company's dividends. Turning to the…

Thank you. We’ll now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Manny Korchman with Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Hi. Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Manny.

You guys have spoken a bit about what this company looks like today versus four years ago when you went public. And I guess one thing that I'm a little bit surprised about not changing is the cap rates in the market on the assets you've been buying. Can you just talk about what's kept that so steady and whether you see that changing over the next four years?

I think -- yes, good morning, Manny. I think several things. First of all, it is real estate without the drama. So in my entire government career, we've really seen a very small movement even after the crisis until we've seen today. So it doesn't tend to move in big blocks. Secondarily, I think that there is a new focus on government properties after we've done a good job of explaining to investors what a wonderful opportunity it is. So I think we have been able to acquire just what we've said we were going to in that 6.5% cap rate for the normal bread-and-butter bull's eye properties that we like to purchase. And then of course, we've seen interest rates slowdown and actual profit will reverse. So I think we're probably here for some time, but as we know it the 6.5% cap rate we can purchase very accretively and we see a good pipeline from here out. But we're not expecting any movement anytime soon.

Thanks, Bill. And Meghan one for you. Just how do you think about doing issuances on the ATM versus completing the forward equity? You did a little bit of ATM in the quarter just surprised you did any just taking up the forward?

Yes. Hi, Manny. We're going to continue to use the ATM going forward as adjusting time tool. At the end of the quarter it's an opportunity to enter the market at an attractive level. And so added to the potential dry powder there from the June 2019 offering with a bit more issuance on the new forward ATM keep the balance sheet in great position for the rest of the year.

So were there assets?

Just to keep the balance sheet in a strong position on a leverage basis for the remainder of the year.

Thanks, everyone.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from Michael Lewis with SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please go ahead.

Thank you. My first question is about the equity issuance as well because it looked like you passed the ATM a little bit below the consensus NAV. I thought the strike on the forward offering was better priced than that maybe correct me if I'm wrong? And then also maybe you could give a little more detail on the new ATM the capability to do forward offerings through that. Is that directly in response to the way you had to fund the recent portfolio acquisition? Can you do -- how much can you do forward that sort of, thing?

Hi, Michael. So the price that we entered the market on the new ATM was very attractive and at an accretive price in terms of the pipeline we're looking at for this year and improved net price relative to the June offering. As we go forward the forward capability functionally is the same as the forward that we implemented on our marketed offering last year and just about a little bit more flexibility to be nimble as the pipeline evolves and comes in the more clearer view as we go through the rest of the year. But functionally, it works exactly the same way.

Okay.

I mean, and again, and all of that is in the backdrop of – remember, we have this cadence of development opportunities that we're putting into place. So we could be fortunate with our bidding efforts and we want to be well positioned to take full advantage of that non-speculative development opportunity. Likewise, we're executing as we said the pipeline is robust and there is a set of opportunities out there that can be very attractive for us. So we're in a moment right now where we're positioning the company again to take advantage of these opportunities that are out there.

Okay. As far – I'm kind of a broken record on this question, but are there any lease expirations on the horizon that you think could be a potential likely move out? I'm guessing you might say no to that so as a part b are there any rent mark-to-markets that are likely to be out of the norm in terms of rent markup or down or capital you need to contribute?

I think the answer thank you for the no that's no. And the second part is I think we've already spoken of any leases that right out-of-the-box that we thought that weren't going to be renewing at higher and I think we've got a great group of buildings that are on the cusp of renewing in our bull's eye strategy. So we're looking forward when the government inflows the good news ahead.

Okay. Thanks. And then just lastly for me, I don't know if you could answer this but it looks like you last increased the dividend in 4Q 2017. Would you expect an increase on the dividend in 2019 or in 2020?

We look forward to the opportunity to continue growing cash flow and giving that out to shareholder's that's what we're here everyday to do.

Okay. Thank you.

Our next question comes from Michael Carroll with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Yeah. Thanks. Bill, can you comment a little bit on the competitive landscape right now for new investments? I know that you previously say, there's a few people bidding pretty aggressive for some of these assets. Are you still seeing those bidders out there right now? Has that calmed down at all? And then I guess what are you doing still right now to get your mid-six type acquisition yields?

Well, good morning. I think a number of answers for that. First of all, I think that some of the folks that were entering the market for the first time and spending a great deal of money on some of these properties may have taken a break. Our usual private equity competitors continue to be out there. We do purchase a number of our facilities off-market that hasn't change. So I think from a competitive standpoint it's the same. I think for some of the larger properties maybe it has decreased a bit. As you know, we don't really go after a lot of the smaller plain vanilla opportunities. We're looking at several lease terms and what these buildings are going to be worth 10, 20, 30 years from now, so we really care about quality. But I will say that, we have seen probably more opportunities over the last 12 months. We expect that to continue. Not surprisingly, as I mentioned before, a lot of these super duper new buildings build-to-suit properties were constructed in the early to mid-2000s before the crisis. Those buildings are coming off of their first lease roll. A lot of the owners of these properties are looking – are getting a little older and looking for opportunities to redeploy or to pass on that wealth to future generations. So we're very pleased with where the pipeline is today.

Are there opportunities out there to buy assets with shorter lease terms where you can probably get a better valuation where you have maybe more knowledge or know if those leases that are going to renew and at what type of rate they're going to renew?

Absolutely. And in fact I think we pointed out that our portfolio last year, which we think is terrific the 14-property portfolio does not have a long-term on-the-lease renewals. And obviously for us, there's obviously a lot of expectation that we'll see some value there. We are looking at all different lease terms. Obviously, there's values depending if you're putting together a lottery bond portfolio constructing a set of cash flows that we are not only consistent that we have full faith in, but also where we see some organic growth as well. And that's where the short-term leases come to the floor. The pricing on those it's interesting. I think when there's three or four years left you'll see the drop. When it gets down to the one or two year period left owners often will hold on to the properties, because obviously with the 94% success rate if you don't do anything else at renewal at that point they tend to just hold on through the transition. But those three to seven years we think are a wonderful opportunity.

Okay. And then, I guess last question from me. The two-development projects, I guess you're saying it's right on time, but it looks like it kind of got delayed one quarter. Is that just timing it may be got pushed back a month or so?

No. It's basically at the end -- we've always said at the end of the third quarter, and we're trying to be just transparent that what happened and what would happen if it happened on October 1. So, I mean we're talking. I think it'll be there. …

Okay.

But I've got to reiterate, I was out with Mike Ibe, our head of development and team at Alameda California. And this building is absolutely spectacular. It is coming along very well. The FDA folks are extremely pleased and as are the GSA folks. And it's a real trophy asset. And we look forward to doing the same thing at Lenexa and perhaps in other areas around the country.

Great, thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question is comes from Jon Petersen with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Great, thanks. Just sticking with the lease expiration schedule for a minute, you have about seven years of average duration. But there's a little bit of a barbell there. I think you touched on it a little on Mike's question. But there's, a lot of near-term maturities and then there's a lot of like really long-term maturities. I guess as we get through the renewals, should we expect this barbell to kind of go away or is there always going to be a certain level of kind of shorter-term leases that you'll be dealing with? And then, as kind of a follow-up on those same lines, should we expect elevated CapEx, over the next couple of years. I guess through 2021, when you get and after that you kind of get the lower renewals should CapEx moderate at a more reasonable level at that point?

Yeah. Jon, we're obviously always working to renew into long 10 year to 15 year lease terms. And so, the maturities that are coming to us in the next two to three years will create likely another wave obviously 10 years to 15 years forward from that. And then as Bill said, we're not terminating any particular lease terms, but we should have a reduced level post-2021. And depending upon what comes to us from the acquisition side of the house. And we look forward to the opportunity to be able to renew these and to build our properties in that high-teens to low-20s and with the appropriate capital to work to do so, as we go through the next few years.

Okay that's helpful. And then, any of the upcoming maturities, do they require congressional approval? Do you have any thoughts on, I guess the executive and legislative branch, don't seem to be able to be focused, they're productive on anything at the moment. So do you have any fears, I guess over the next couple of years if things can get held up in Congress?

Interestingly, we've seen on the prospectus level things begin to move. I know it sounds incredible, but actually move quicker over the last several years. To remind folks, it's basically the two committees, analyst and basically it's passed on a voice vote. So it's a fairly rapid process from that standpoint. I think the government is also realizing to their benefit to get these up to 27 months in advance, to get these things going from a prospectus side. We do have an FBI facility coming up. One of our absolute best properties within our portfolio which will be prospectus, and we're looking forward to a terrific renewal down there in San Antonio. But you can expect that the $3 million level that's the number above it. It's going to be a prospectus. And below it it's going to be handled by the regions.

Okay. Thank you.

There are no further questions. I would like to turn the floor over to Darrell for closing comments.

Okay. Thank you everyone for joining the Easterly Government Properties First Quarter 2019 Conference Call. The company is growing on a foundation of premier assets backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government, and we appreciate your continued partnership. And look forward to speaking with you all again soon.

This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation.