Greetings, and welcome to Easterly Government Properties’ First Quarter 2017 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ms. Lindsay Winterhalter, Vice President, Investor Relations. Thank you, Ms. Winterhalter. You may now begin.

Good morning. Before the call begins, please note the use of forward-looking statements by the Company on this conference call. Statements made on this call may include statements which are not historical facts and are considered forward-looking. The Company intends these forward-looking statements to be covered by the Safe Harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Act Reform of 1995, and is making the statement for the purpose of complying with those Safe Harbor provisions. Although, the Company believes that its plans, intentions, expectations, strategies and prospects as reflected in or suggested by those forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that these plan, intentions, expectations or strategies will be attained or achieved. Furthermore, actual results may differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements and will be affected by a variety of risks and factors that are beyond the Company’s control, including, without limitation, those contained in Item 1A Risk Factors of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 filed with SEC on March 02, 2017 and it's other SEC filings. The Company assumes no obligations to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Additionally, on this conference call, the Company may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as funds from operations and cash available for distribution. You can find a tabular reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures in the most comparable current GAAP numbers in the Company earnings release and separate supplemental information package on the investor relations page of the Company's Web site at ir.easterlyreit.com. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Darrell Crate, Chairman of the Easterly Government Properties.

Thanks, Lindsay. Good morning, everyone. DEA remains the only internally managed public REIT focused on the United States’ government leased real-estate. Our growing portfolio of young, machine critical Class A facilities are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government, which we believe provides our shareholders with a steady platform for strong recurring cash flows. Before discussing the details for the first quarter, I'd like to take a step back and reflect on our growth over the past year. In 2016, the Company closed on seven accretive transactions, which translated into approximately a $157 million in total acquisition volume. We are now just one third of the way through 2017, and we’ve already made great strides towards accomplishing our stated $350 million acquisition goal for the year. The acquisition of OSHA laboratory along with the two announced pending VA acquisitions have a combined value of $260 million. Development continues to be a growing contributor to the growth story with FDA Alameda being delivered in 2018 and the recently announced FDA Lenexa, which will deliver in 2019. Today, Easterly has a market capitalization of approximately $1 billion, but more importantly, our flow has increased 2.5 times since the IPO to over $700 million. We believe this market cap and increased flow, coupled with our growth drive through acquisitions and development will continue to reduce the cost of entry and exit in our stock and further enable us to broaden our shareholder base as we look to build the highest quality portfolio available in the REIT market. Further, our team is constantly looking at attractive sources of capital to achieve strong financing into these assets. With our goal of providing shareholders with earnings growth sufficient to drive a low double-digit total return opportunity, we believe Easterly will continue to be a heaven for shareholders looking for strong risk adjusted return that rival the Russell 2000 for investors on a compounding basis. Now, I’ll turn the call over to Bill to provide more information on the developments within Easterly that drove shareholder return this quarter.

Thanks, Darrell, and good morning. I would like to begin by highlighting the Company's achievements in the first quarter of 2017. We were very pleased to acquire the 75,000 square foot Sandy, Utah Occupational Safety and Held Administration laboratory, which when combined with our other properties, represents a portfolio of 44 buildings with over 97% of its annualized lease income derived from the full faith and credit of the United States’ Federal Government. OSHA Sandy well represents our focused investment discipline. The state-of-the-art laboratory serves the entire country by providing the analysis of a multitude of chemicals and maintaining OSHA’s online chemical sampling information database. This facility is one of three locations nationwide, which also has as the Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management for OSHA, an important division which provides specialized technical support to the broader OSHA mission. Through the Easterly’s philosophy, this laboratory's mission is critical in the hierarchy of the tenant agency. Each release announcement in the first quarter of its pending acquisitions of two VA outpatient clinics marks the Company's entry into an important new market, which it’s been following for several years. The acquisition of these two new state-of-the-art Class A VA outpatient facilities, totals a combined 414,000 square feet of lease space, all backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. The first facility is located in Loma Linda, California and is a one of a kind premier asset in the VA health system. Located just two miles from the federally owned VA hospital, this brand new 327,000 square foot ambulatory care facility sits on a 37 acre campus, is surrounded by over 2,000 parking spaces and addresses the outpatient medical needs of the surrounding 72,000 veterans in the region. The facility will employ approximately 500 VA health professional and…

Thank you, Bill. Today, I will touch upon our current portfolio, discuss our first quarter results, provide an update on our balance sheet, review our 2017 guidance and cover this quarters' capital markets activity. Additional details regarding our first quarter results can be found in the Company's first quarter earnings release and supplemental information package. As of March 31st, we owned 44 operating properties, comprising nearly 3.2 million square feet of commercial real estate. The weighted average lease term for the portfolio was 5.7 years, the average age of our portfolio was 12.9 years and our portfolio occupancy remains at a 100%. In addition, 97.4% of our lease revenue is backed by the full faith and credit of the United States’ government. For the first quarter, FFO per share on a fully diluted basis was $0.31; FFO as adjusted per share on a fully diluted basis was $0.30; and our cash available for distribution was $12.2 million. GAAP measures and reconciliations to GAAP measures have been provided in our supplemental information package. For the 12 months ending December 31, 2017, the Company is reiterating its guidance for FFO of $1.25 to $1.29 per share on a fully diluted basis. This guidance assumes acquisitions of $350 million in 2017, including the OSHA Sandy acquisition completed in the first quarter, the announced VA Loma Linda acquisition with an anticipated closing date in the second quarter of 2017, as well as the announced VA South Bend acquisition with an anticipated closing date in the third quarter of 2017. This guidance does not contemplate any dispositions. This guidance is forward-looking and reflects management's view of current and future market conditions. The Company's actual results may differ materially from this guidance. Turning to the balance sheet. At quarter end, the Company had total indebtedness of…

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session [Operator Instructions]. Our first question is from Manny Korchman with Citi. Please go ahead.

This is Gill here with Manny. Just wondering so it feels like lately you're more focused on the FDA and more recently the VA; just wondering, I saw environments change since you started out and your focus on the DEA, or are you just…

First of all, basically, since we went public there have only been two opportunities for build-to-suit projects within the GSA space that we would actually be interested in completing. And I'm pleased to announce that we won both awards. So basically if it's in the bull’s eye, we don’t make the determination on the development opportunities, if it's in the bull’s eye, it could be the FDA, it could be secret service or any of the mission critical agencies that we think are important. So that's a bit random. But I will say that certainly with Mike Ibe and his development team’s expertise, it's probably not surprising after you've engaged to build one FDA lab that they see the work and the background experience you've had that they probably look towards you to do others. The VA opportunities, I've already discussed, and those were two wonderful opportunities one much larger than the other. But we think that the VA is an area that we've certainly been looking at for the last several years and we're very happy to be able to get these two properties signed up.

Thank you. The next question is from Michael Lewis with SunTrust. Please go ahead.

My first question, I'm going to follow-up on Joe's a little bit. And over the last six to nine months, we've had the election. As you look at underwriting agencies, has anything really changed for any agencies more attractive less attractive, or do you do that work as it comes up in your target universe?

I think that it's probably no secret the current administration is very much in favor of what we, the monitor being done building agencies, so you think FBI, the DEA, ICE, CBP, the Federal courts that make-up over 62% of our portfolio. So I think that they are certainly in favor now. Obviously, there’s some agencies that are not as much in favor; but again, they are going to continue to exist, there just going to be different priorities, going forward. We are very pleased to have our particular EPA laboratory based in Kansas by the way and all the public and state, because this mission is enduring and is actually more -- I’ll actually endure pass the current administration’s tenure now that we take a position on who is in federal office. But I think we're looking for long-term enduring missions of the agencies and we believe every single building that we have in our portfolio certainly fits that.

Do you still expect everybody all of your '17 and '18 lease explorations to renew, and part B to that question. It looks like one of the 18 lease expiries is this cosmetics company in Florida. How do we think about some of those nine core properties that are still a small piece of the portfolio, but still kind of in there?

Absolutely, and I'm happy to announce that we have renewed SSA, Kearny Mesa and which is a very small property not in our bull's eye. But we have renewed that for the next 10 years firm and 15 with the soft term at the end at basically the current rent amount, which we would expect is smaller non-bulls eye properties to renew. I'm also happy to announce that we have renewed ICE [indiscernible]. Actually, we have just combined three leases that were expiring under different years and moved from all back to 11, 27, 22, so you might see that reflected. We’re very pleased there, no cash changes on the rent; but obviously, the government realizing that this is a long-term place for them to operate from and it is the second busiest border crossing in California. On our non-core assets, we’ve said in the past that all of these we believe are terrific properties, but also sources of funds as we drive, where I think 97.5% full faith and credit now as we drive to 100%. So when we see opportunities come up, we will move those properties out of the portfolio. And as we purchase portfolios in the future, there will be occasionally buildings that are either non-core or not in our bull’s eye; and obviously, we want to move those out at some point accretively for our shareholders.

You sort of answered my last question there. But I'll try to ask it a little differently anyway. You’re kind of in growth mode here. But as far as disposition criteria, so obviously, we know a couple of assets that are non-core. As you think about dispositions criteria going forward, is it buildings that -- is it strictly age you want to keep the portfolio young? Do you look to maybe get ahead of some lease expirations, I don’t know, as far down the road but maybe Trump is still President when the forest service comes due. How do you kind of think of those decisions?

Well, I think, let’s just take it in reverse order. The United States Forest Service is actually, this is its operational headquarters. They've gotten 198 million acres, I don’t think they’re just going to open up the fences and eliminate one of the greatest resources the United States has. So we’re not particularly worried about that one. In fact, it's actually gaining employees as other older facilities are being consolidated into it. But I will say that we don’t look just the next lease term, we’re looking two lease terms out. And when you're sort of at 11 with these new acquisitions, 11 and some years old, the average tenancy in these buildings is over 40 years. I will be all set for this conversation about 10 or 15 years from now. But correct as buildings do get older, we will constantly look and make sure that we can see a lot of runway for our mission for particular building, if their meeting mention, but luckily and not so luckily that isn't the problem today.

Thank you [Operator Instructions]. And the next question is from Michael Carroll with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Bill, can you comment on the type of deals that you were currently tracking. I know you kind of made some mentions about your pipeline currently. But specifically, I'm looking at the VA type deals and how big do you want to grow that exposure and what you could complete it in the near-term to expand that small part of portfolio.

I’d say -- Michael good morning by the way. I’d say that there no changes at all. It just that VA is just like adding FBI or DEA or another of the federal courts to our set of opportunities. We’re looking at lots of opportunities in the GSA and you'd expect most opportunities in the end of the GSA, because it’s a much large universe. However, I will say that as we mentioned, the Federal Government is on a 10 year, $63 billion program to update and build new VA facilities for our 22 million veterans out there. So certainly, as we drive towards new buildings, there are going to more opportunities than usual within the VA space. And we try to figure out the sizing of that and that’s probably those opportunities we figure expends our bulls eye from 500 and 550 and perhaps $3 billion or $4billion worth of opportunities there. But I think you’re going to see fairly consistent path going forward.

That leads to me to my next question, I guess, on the built-to-suit type activity. I know the VA they have a lot of built-to-suits out there, or built-to-suits requirement. I mean should we expect your development pipeline, are those capital committed to that pipeline to increase in the near term as your increased focus on those assets?

I think that certainly there will be opportunities there. We would love to develop some VAs. I will say that it's a very competitive market, as you can imagine. And we will -- so with our team led by Mike Ibe, I can think of no better person to be able to take advantage of winning some of those awards. But I’d also like to get back for fact we said that we're certainly do 10% to 15%, max being sort of 15% of our entire portfolio in development. I will say, it is an incredibly accretive attractive opportunity for us, where it would be in VA or in mission critical GSA facilities as we are usually getting brand new 15 to 20 year full facing credit leases on buildings that are squarely in the middle of our bull’s eye. We will built them, we certainly know the quality of our team puts forward with our wonderful design build contractors out there, so little risk and lot of upside.

Darrell, maybe you can touch on the Company and how the company plans to run the balance sheet, going forward. And mainly, I am interested in the long-term leverage targets, I guess, with the announced VA deals, it looks like leverages going to increase this year. I mean are you comfortable with that range and how high do you want to bring leverage?

I'll turn it to Meghan to talk about the specific balance sheet. But then I can talk about the general capitalization of the Company.

Mike as we've shared in the past, we’re very comfortable with leverage levels for full facing credit U.S. government cash flows as always in the 40% to 50% range, which would triangulate to 6 to 7 times to EBITDA. So with the addition of these two new VA’s and the duration it bring to the asset side of the portfolio, continue to be comfortable with those leverage levels.

And I just add to that, and I think one of the -- our longer term shareholders understand this. We’re very focused on getting cost of capital low and we do that by working every aspect and every channel of the debt markets. And we also believe that we get the lowest cost of equity by always working on reducing the cost of entry and actually exit in the equity market; such that, we can have the broadest base of shareholders as possible. As you look at our shareholder list, you will see a large universe of traditional REIT investors but also these growth investors. And so each and every day, as you look over the next five years; we’re very focused on this very high quality portfolio and achieving Russell 2000 returns for investors. And we believe that this stock should be well positioned as an anchor for any growth or growth and income investor in addition to doing a great job relative to the REIT universe.

Thank you. There are no further questions in queue, at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Crate for closing remarks.

Great. So thank you, everyone, for joining the Easterly Government Properties first quarter conference call. We appreciate your interest and your support, and we look forward to continuing to build a very high-quality portfolio of leases backed by the full facing credit of the U.S. government in our effort to deliver strong compounding returns to shareholders, going forward.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines, at this time. And thank you for your participation.