Good morning ladies and gentlemen and thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Donaldson’s Fourth Quarter Fiscal Year 2012 conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, there will be a question and answer session and instructions will be given at that time. Should anyone require assistance on the call today, please press the star followed by the zero. And as a reminder, this call is being recorded today, August 27, 2012. I would now like to turn the call over to Rick Sheffer. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you Craig, and welcome everyone to Donaldson’s Fiscal 2012 Fourth Quarter conference call and webcast. Following this brief introduction, Bill Cook, our Chairman, President and CEO, and Jim Shaw, our Vice President and CFO will review our record fourth quarter and full-year earnings and our initial outlook for fiscal ’13. Next, I need to review our Safe Harbor statement with you. Any statements in this call regarding our business that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, and our future results could differ materially from the forward-looking statements made today. Our actual results may be affected by many important factors, including risks and uncertainties identified in our press release and in our SEC filings. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Bill Cook. Bill?

Thanks Rich and good morning everyone. As you’ve seen in the press release we issued earlier this morning, we set fourth quarter records for sales, operating margin, net earnings, and earnings per share. This very successful conclusion to our fiscal ’12 also resulted in record sales and profits for the full year. Our fiscal ’12 performance means that we have now delivered earnings records in 21 of the last 23 years. Now I’d like to take a few minutes to summarize our results for the fourth quarter. Our fourth quarter sales were $657 million, up 5% over last year. Excluding the negative impact of foreign currency translation due to the stronger U.S. dollar, we had organic sales growth of 11%, which we are very, very pleased with. This combination of our 11% organic sales growth and a 15.1% operating margin helped to deliver an increase in pre-tax income of 13% and an EPS increase of 12%, resulting in a record $0.43 per share. As you know, we have two reporting segments and I will now cover highlights for each. First in our engine product segment, excluding the impact of foreign exchange, our local currency sales in the quarter increased 6% over last year. The primary drivers of this increase were our OEM businesses – off-road and on-road – which were up 11 and 6% respectively. Our off-road product sales were up 16% in the Americas and 11% in Europe as the agricultural equipment markets we serve remain strong globally. This offset slower growth in Asia where excess inventory of mining and construction equipment in China has impacted the overall Asian off-road equipment market. The 6% increase in our on-road product sales was primarily due to higher North American new heavy truck build rates at our customers. Class A heavy truck…

Thanks Bill and good morning everyone. Our gross margin was 35% in the quarter compared to 36.3% in last year’s fourth quarter. In the quarter, the biggest drivers of the decrease were slightly lower fixed cost absorption from softer customer demand in Asia as well as the planned ramp-up of our new plant in Aguascalientes, Mexico, including the related product transfer costs. This combined to lower our gross margin by 100 basis points. Also contributing were higher commodity costs outside the United States due to the strengthening U.S. dollar, and finally we saw a shift in our total sales from first fit towards aftermarket. Last year, aftermarket sales were 52% of our total sales but this quarter they were 48% as engine aftermarket sales were weak in Europe and China while a ramp-up in project sales in gas turbine and industrial filtration solutions moved more of our overall mix towards first fit. Partially offsetting this was the impact of our continuous improvement initiatives which increased gross margin by 110 basis points. Our operating expenses remain well under control and have provided much of our operating leverage this year. In the fourth quarter, operating expenses were 19.8% of sales, which was down 210 basis points from last year. Reduced distribution and warranty costs contributed 100 basis points to the improvement. In addition, while we continue to assess the direction of the overall global economy, we’ve been cautious in managing our discretionary operating expenses such as adding headcount additions that had been previously planned. This operating leverage resulted in a 60 basis point improvement in the quarter. There’s still a lot of uncertainty regarding the European economy, the pace of the general industrial recovery in China, as well as the potential for a fiscal cliff in the United States, so we’ll continue…

Thanks Jim. So now looking forward into our new year, fiscal ’13, we expect that the overall European economy will remain in a shallow recession for the first half of our fiscal year before beginning to slowly recover in our second half and as we enter the new calendar year. We also expect the Chinese economy to continue improving but slowly for the next two quarters. We expect North and Latin America to remain the strongest regions globally, although their growth is expected to be moderated by the situations in Europe and China. As Jim mentioned, our outlook includes a strong U.S. dollar at 1.24 versus the euro, and we expect our full-year fiscal ’13 sales to between 2.62 and 2.72 billion, or an increase of between 5 to 9% over last year’s record of 2.5 billion. Now as you update your models for fiscal ’13, as Jim mentioned, please note that we’re expecting our most difficult year-over-year comparisons in our first quarter. When factoring in the significant year-over-year impact of currency translation, we are anticipating sales growth in the low single digits in the first quarter with a continued mix towards first fit, keeping our operating margin roughly equal to last year’s first quarter. As Jim discussed, we also expect a year-over-year increase in our effective tax rate in the first quarter. So in total, when combining the impact of the foreign currency translation and the higher tax rate, we’re expecting little, if any, of our full-year fiscal ’13 EPS growth to be generated in our first quarter. Now switching gears, I want to review our outlook by segment. Our full-year engine sales are forecast to increase between 3 and 10% over fiscal ’12. This includes the impact of the foreign currency translation we both mentioned earlier. Within our…

Certainly, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time we will begin the question and answer session. [Operator instructions] And our first question does come from the line of Kevin Maczka with BB&T Capital Markets.

Hi, good morning. Bill, first question on the engine guidance – strong year this year, up 9% but we exited the year flat in the fourth quarter. So my question is given what you said about the truck environment and the declining OEM build rates, I know we have more emerging market expansion, we have new products; but what gives you the comfort that we accelerate to as much as 10% for the year when things seem to be moderating and we exited the year flat?

Kevin, part of it taking a look at China, we are forecasting for China to begin recovering in the fourth quarter. It might have been sort of the bottom for us, so part of it is our business in Asia and it’s not just our business in China but how it impacts the rest of Asia in terms of South Korea and Japan. And then I think a lot of it, you covered—you touched on in terms of our emerging market growth objectives in terms of more distribution, more product line expansion will help us in the aftermarket. So those are a couple of the factors. We’re also seeing the ag equipment market remaining good and construction, absent mining, also remaining good. So the heavy truck numbers are the ones that we’ve all been looking at the last couple of weeks, and as I noted they are projecting builds to be down in our fiscal year by about 8%. But that’s still from pretty good levels from where we were in fiscal ’12, so we put all that together, Kevin, in our guidance. So it’s a couple of minuses and some pluses as well.

Yeah, so do you have a minus assumed in your guidance for the OEM truck build portion of the business?

We do, yes.

Okay, got it. On the ERP, if I can shift gears and just ask a question there, that sometimes makes investors nervous, for good reason, when they hear about ERP rollout globally. We did recently see another big filtration company have some issues with that. Can you just talk about the scope of this project and what you’re doing to prepare for it to hopefully avoid some issues that other companies have had?

Yeah, it’s a good question, Kevin, and I know there’s some sensitivity when the ERP is mentioned. We’re taking a very cautious and planful approach. This is a four-year project, so it’s not a revolutionary change, it’s an evolutionary change. We feel this is critical to supporting our strategic growth goals when we—at a $5 billion company, our goal to be that by fiscal ’21 that we need to be acting as a global company and really on one system. So it’s in support of that, but it’s a four-year project so we’re very planful in terms of how we’re going to execute it. We’re going to not jeopardize the business as we do this, but we’re going to do it in conjunction with running the business on a day-to-day basis.

Okay, thanks for that. I’ll get back in queue.

And our next question does come from the line of Charlie Brady with BMO Capital Markets.

Hey, thanks. Good morning guys. On the engine products growth question and the OEM truck build rate, I know you said you’re factoring—or forecasting that to be down, but I’m trying to gauge – are you expecting that to be down to the same degree as kind of industry build rates or are you picking up—you know, is there some share build in there? And also, how much of that fiscal ’13 engine products growth is coming from having those liquid programs starting to hit the revenue line?

Charlie, on the first question, we factored in, as I mentioned to Kevin, the recent forecast in terms of the build rate production. We feel that we’re probably getting a little bit of share in fiscal ’13, additional share to offset that, but mostly it’s some downward pressure due to the build rates. And on the liquid filtration, we haven’t quantified publicly how much of that is going to be in fiscal ’13. It’s a little bit, but it is additive so that also helps offset the build rate reductions.

Okay, and then on your engine growth forecast again, first half versus second, given your commentary on what you said about Q1 and the comparison there, it sounds like you’d expect second half—more growth in second half versus first half. Is that correct?

Yes, we do. I mean, we talked—Jim and I both talked about the first quarter and we have the currency headwind is the strongest there if you’re looking at this in dollars. And then the second quarter is traditionally one of our weaker ones just with the holidays, so certainly this year for the engine side we’re looking for a stronger second half versus first half.

All right. And then can you give us what the share count is—the total shares outstanding at the end of the quarter rather than just the average for the quarter?

Charlie, we’re just looking it up as I speak, so.

Okay. I’ll get back in queue. Thanks.

And our next question does come from the line of Hamzah Mazari with Credit Suisse.

Good morning, thank you. The first question is just on market share gains. You guys have highlighted that you expect 2 to 4% on a normalized basis in any given year. Just wondering what you’re seeing on the market share gain side in both industrial and engine, particularly with some of your competitors having a tougher time than you are.

Hamzah, Bill here. You know, I think you’re right – the 2 to 4% is what we target, and that’s actually when we look backwards over the last two decades, the last 20 years. That’s what we’ve averaged. It’s hard to measure that on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis, but over longer periods of time we can subtract out from our grow both the overall market growth, really pricing isn’t much of a factor, and then we’re left with what we believe is our share gains. We feel like we’re on track with that. A lot of this is being driven by the PowerCore products that we mentioned and also the liquid filtration; but it’s hard to measure that on a quarter-to-quarter or a month-to-month basis. But we feel like we’re on track for that in fiscal ’13, and that’s driving a lot of the technology investments that we’re making in fiscal ’13, is to maintain that going forward.

That’s fair. And then just on your investment spend, could you maybe talk about how much visibility you have in your business right now? You talked about Asia improving, Europe being worse. Just curious to see how that impacts your investment decision-making right now – you know, do you pull back that spend if Asia doesn’t recover or gets worse relative to your expectation? And has visibility improved in your business, say now relative to six, eight months ago?

Hamzah, this is Bill. I’ll start and then maybe Jim will add a few comments. You know, the visibility, I would say, is probably less than we had six or eight months ago, and just in terms of our overall visibility you have to remember that a little bit over half—about half of our business is first fit or filters for production at our customers, and half is replacement parts. On replacement parts, there’s very little visibility because the orders tend to come in and go out in very short periods of time. But on the half where we have visibility, longer term visibility, and this would include new filtration systems for our engine OEMs or gas turbines, et cetera, what we’ve seen is that customers might not be changing the amount that they’re ordering per month but they’re not ordering out as many months as they were six or eight months ago. So they’re not placing forward orders like they were, even though they might be ordering the same amount per month. So visibility is a little bit less, and so we respond to that situation by making sure that we’re trying to stay in contact with our customers and getting also the qualitative assessment of what they think they see in terms of their business. From our investment perspective, I mean, since we’re mostly an organic growth company and we spend a lot on capital investments in terms of supporting our organic growth opportunities, we tend to look at those in terms of multi-year plans and a lot of them are projects that take maybe a year and a half to complete, so you can’t wait until you need the capacity to start it. You have to have the capacity coming online when the need is growing. So we take a look at it that way, but we do have the ability and have done in the past, as you know, to slow down capital projects if business conditions slow down like we did in 2009. So we can adjust that dial, but we also want to make sure that we’ve got the capacity in place, especially in emerging economies, when we need it because if we don’t have it, then we’re going to miss the opportunity.

Fair enough. Thank you very much.

Jim, do you want to add anything?

No, I think you hit it. I think the only other thing I would add is on some of our larger capital projects, we do have monthly or more frequent meetings where we review the status of those, and we do have the ability to put the brakes on depending on what we’re seeing. So we do have flexibility, but as Bill said, these are investments we need to make for the long term, but we can manage the timing a little bit.

I think Rich has got the number on the share count.

Yeah, referring back to Charlie’s question, we ended the year with a fully diluted share count at 151.4 million, so a little bit less than (inaudible) quarter.

And our next question does come from the line of Eli Lustgarten with Longbow Capital.

Good morning everyone. I hate to pursue, but could you maybe give us some more color on the first half-second half split in both segments. You know, we talked about engine and also talked a lot (inaudible) because the 15, 20% production cut in truck taking place now, it’s a lot more—ACT seems to be lagging in their bringing the numbers down. Ag, because of the drought, we’re hearing some—are you seeing some deferrals stretch out of production. I mean, (inaudible) just did it arbitrarily by missing by 700 million. And in construction, they seem to have been stopping the channels a bit, in the rental channels, over half the sales. There’s a lot of fear of some real change in the OEM side of it, and alternatively with such a big gain in gas turbines, can you give us some idea of what the (inaudible) of that business would look like as we look out.

Yeah Eli, this is Jim. I think Bill sort of hit on the engine side of it, and even though we do see some organic growth opportunities, that plan is modeled more back-end heavy. However on the industrial side with some of the gas turbine and other projects, we have fairly good visibility to those. It’s always a matter of—you know, because they are larger projects, they could slip from one quarter to the next, sometimes outside of our control. But the industrial business is a little more even to maybe weighted slightly higher to the first three quarters versus the fourth quarter. So industrial is a more radical plan, even taking into account the headwinds in the first quarter with FX.

And you expect that to be enough to give you positive comparisons in the first half of the year?

Yes.

At this point. And when you look at the income statements, the corporate unallocated sort of disappeared again – 700,000 as opposed to a more normal run rate. Can you give us some idea what’s going on there and what should we model for 2013 in corporate unallocated, particularly with the pension and SAP system going in.

Yeah, as we talked about before, that one’ s a little difficult for us to predict going forward, but to put a little color around it, the ERP and the pension really shouldn’t affect that number because those do get built into our business plans, both for engine and industrial. But a couple things that impact that as you look at the year-over-year comparison, one is for the year, we did have a little bit of favorable FX and also some of our interest expense comparisons were favorable. The other thing which makes that number, what I said, a little harder to predict is some our intercompany eliminations when we’re selling amongst ourselves. Typically when we’re in higher growth modes like we were last year where we were high growth, building a little bit of inventory. You’ll see that number grow, or you’ll see a bigger number there than this year where we’ve been a little more stable. So I think if I were modeling it, again, it’s hard to predict but I would say something around like we see this quarter is probably a little more normal than what you saw last year.

So between half a million and $1 million a quarter is what we’re talking about?

Yeah, but again, it can fluctuate with things outside our control.

I understand. You just touched on another point. Your inventory seemed to have come down corporate-wise. With kind of growth, have you been sort of balancing—bringing inventory down across the system in anticipation of a slower period in the next six months?

I wouldn’t say it’s that. I think we have a lot of initiatives to improve. We’ve talked before about a project we kicked off a couple years ago to really improve our distribution and having the right inventory in the right places, so a lot of it’s been just focused on our distribution. Also in fairness, part of that is FX, so about $20 million impact is FX so it would be up on a dollar-to-dollar comparison, so that is playing into it a little bit as well.

And just (inaudible), you had not seen any change in ag production schedules to you guys at this point, or construction at all in the second half of the year?

Eli, this is Bill. No, we have not seen any meaningful changes.

All right. Thank you very much.

And our next question does come from the line of Brian Drab with William Blair.

Good morning. Congratulations on a great fiscal year – solid end of the year.

Thanks, Brian. Good morning to you. Brian Drab – William Blair So first question just on PowerCore – can you give us an idea of how PowerCore breaks down between first fit and aftermarket in the engine business?

Yeah, Brian, Rich is looking it up right now.

So Brian, in our latest quarter it’s still working out to be one-third first fit, two-thirds replacement. In the quarter, the majority of the growth was in the aftermarket as our aftermarket sales were up 35% in the quarter for PowerCore.

So at this point, would you say that it’s safe to say that you’re starting—I mean, you’re clearly, I think, starting to see the benefits of PowerCore driving share gains in the aftermarket, and that’s become a factor that’s adding at least a few points to your growth in the aftermarket. Is that your perception?

Brian, that’s a fair assessment that really supports what we were talking about earlier in the call about the question around the 2 to 4% market share growth. PowerCore does that for us in the aftermarket. And it’s—

And was it—sorry, Bill, did I cut you off?

I was just saying, and it is doing it based on the percentages that Rich mentioned in terms of the growth.

And what would you say is the more significant factor in driving growth in the aftermarket? Is it adding the 126 distributors or is it PowerCore and other proprietary technology?

Brian, Bill again. You know, we haven’t quantified the individual pieces for the quarter. I would say over the long term, it’s going to be PowerCore. In the short term, I think we’d pick up a lot from adding distribution as you start to switch distributors over to Donaldson or by adding part numbers, because you’d probably get—that ramps up quicker than the PowerCore in the short term. But longer term, PowerCore will be—is transformational for us.

Okay, great. And then at the September 2010 analyst day and since, you’ve talked about a modest change in your capital allocation plan in terms of share repurchases going to 2% repurchase as opposed to the historical 3%. But in this fiscal year, it was 3%. Can you talk a little bit about why that was in this last fiscal year, and what we should expect there in the next fiscal year?

Sure, Brian – Bill again. You know, I think when we talked about it two years ago, and as we modeled it out as part of our updated strategic plan, part of our assumption would be we’d be getting slightly more of our growth through selective, sort of bolt-on acquisitions, and we’re always looking. We have an active process and team doing that, but we haven’t made any acquisitions in the last couple years. We haven’t found either targets that fit and/or at prices that we were willing to pay. And so then it was, well, what do we do with the cash that we’re generating and how do we return value to shareholders, so we stepped up the share repurchase this year based on that. I think the model that we talked about two years ago about targeting 2% is probably going to be more like our long-term average, but it is dependent on whether we’re doing acquisitions or not.

Brian, it’s Jim, too. I think the other thing I would add is that number is more of a longer term view, and we were a little bit opportunistic here this quarter.

Got it, okay. Thank you.

And our next does come from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies & Company.

Good morning. Two quick questions – one, can you give a little bit more color on how you’re thinking about cost pressures, raw material inflation in 2013, but also your commentary about especially special application products. Can you tease out a little bit where you’re seeing the growth in particular in disc drive filtration and what’s going to drive your optimism there?

Sure, this is Jim. I’ll start with the commodity piece of your question. What we’re seeing for the most part on our significant commodities, which would be steel and media, which is a paper-based product, is generally in the United States we’re seeing it be relatively flat with not a lot of pressure one way or another. Some of the petroleum-based products, we’re seeing a little more pressure on those, but where we are seeing some pressures is overseas, especially in Europe, where most of those commodities trade based on dollar, so they’re seeing pressures in their local currency which does give us some margin pressures as well as any products that they would source from the U.S., including some of our product that is sourced intercompany to Europe. So while we’re not seeing a lot of commodity pressures in the United States, we are seeing some based on the dollar fluctuation overseas.

Laurence, it’s Bill here on the special applications, and I’ll talk specifically about disc drive because I think that’s probably an easy story to tell. Part of it is if you think back to last fall with the floods in Thailand and how that disrupted the entire disc drive chain for our customers and for other suppliers, what we’ve seen in the last—since really the first quarter of this calendar year, is a continued recovery back to more normal levels in that market, so in the second calendar quarter there were 157 million drives that were shipped. That was up 30% over the fourth quarter of last calendar year, and we’ve seen that 657 million drive rate continuing through the current quarter. So part of the rebound that we’re seeing in our sales forecast is predicated on the recovery from the Thai floods last year.

Thank you.

And our next question does come from the line of Brian Sponheimer with Gabelli & Company.

Hi, good morning. Great job in the quarter, particularly on the industrial side from an operating profit standpoint. We just wanted to dig a little bit deeper into the engine side. There was about a $5 million decline in EBIT versus—or on flat sales. Just dig into kind of the puts and takes of what you saw there, just a little bit more than what we heard before please.

Sure. This is Jim. I think a couple of the drivers there were some of the margin items I mentioned in my prepared comments, so within the engine group we did see more of a mix shift in terms of the sales mix was higher towards first fit versus aftermarket. We also did over the last couple of quarters see more softness in some of our business in Asia Pacific, and that really affected—it was driven by China, but it was really impacting Korea as well as Japan, and we did have a little less absorption of some of our fixed costs in the engine plant as a result of that. So those are probably the two main drivers in terms of the profitability shift a little bit on the engine side.

Brian, this is Rich. It would also be the start-up of our plant in Aguascalientes, Mexico, which is primarily supporting our engine businesses in Mexico and Central and South America. And that was planned, but it does affect--

Right. Can you just quantify that start-up cost?

It was—in terms of transfers of product, that was about $1 million; and then just the plant not being at full capacity yet is probably another couple million dollars. So probably 50 basis points year-over-year.

Okay. All right, that’s great. Thank you very much. I guess this thing with this—if we’re thinking about the first half of the year and the mix shift, you did a good job breaking this down and we’re likely to see some fairly similar—a fairly similar environment for you to be selling into for the next three to six months as it relates to the mix shift. Correct?

Yeah, I think that’s fair. We’re—as Bill mentioned, it’s probably one of our more difficult times right now in terms of visibility looking forward; but to the extent it’s status quo in Europe and Asia, specifically China, I think that’s a fair assessment.

Okay. All right, great. Thank you very much. Good quarter.

And our next question does come from the line of Richard Eastman of Robert W. Baird.

Yes, good morning. Nice looking quarter; nice finish to the year. Bill, could you just talk a minute about the puts and takes on gross margin going forward into ’13? Obviously there will be more—first fit truck business will fade, so that’d be a positive; but gas turbine picks up, that’s a negative. FX is a negative. Would you expect maybe fiscal ‘13’s gross margin to come in about flat with ’12, or will there be a little bit of pressure there?

This is Jim. I can start on that one. I think we probably will see a little more pressure on the gross margin line year-over-year, similar to what we saw here in this fourth quarter, and it will be the things you talked about as we have a higher project base, some of the absorption, some of the headwinds with regards to currency and what that does to our margins on the foreign-sourced goods, or the goods sourced outside the euro zone. So I think it’s fair to say that we will see a little bit of pressure year-over-year on margins, but our guidance anticipates working the operating expenses and holding those and managing those carefully so that we can produce the operating margin guidance that we’ve laid out.

So clearly the volume line here and the absorption at the operating expense line, pretty key to the quarter in terms of where you come out in the range here. Very volume-driven year.

Yes, yes. Volume will be key.

Okay. And then Bill, in IFS you had mentioned a comment around the replacement business being—kind of accelerating beyond the new equipment business maybe slowing a bit. Can you just remind us in IFS, maybe what percentage of sales is replacement?

Sure Rick, and Rich is looking that up. The one thing I wanted to just add to Jim’s comments on the margin is that we have our continuous improvement initiatives which are ongoing, and we have ramped those up or have continued to maintain a strong focus on those to offset any possible cost increases, and also the mix and currency impacts that Jim mentioned, so.

Okay – yeah, yeah.

Okay, I just wanted to highlight that. Sometimes we don’t talk about that because it’s part of the normal course of business, but it’s a really big deal for us in terms of protecting the gross margin.

Hey Rick, this is Rich. Within IFS, about 60% of our sales would be first fit or new systems; 40% would be replacement filters. We have seen that trend up over time. If we go back a couple of years ago, we were maybe at about 35% replacement, so we’ve picked up about five points.

I see. Okay, okay. And then just one last question, and just kind of big picture – if I look at the local currency kind of core growth rate assumption, so adding currency back in, we’re looking at maybe an 8 to 12% growth rate the next 12 months. And if I just think about that geographically, it’s a little tougher than by product line. So are we kind of thinking between the Americas, Europe and Asia, is the growth leader here—you know, is it the Americas or is it kind of gas turbine business in Asia, so it was Asia? How do we just apportion that growth rate by the three geographies?

Rick, it’s Bill here. So in terms of what we see as the strongest region, it probably would be the Americas, so North America and Latin America. That’s been sort of the engine so far; we see that continuing. So that would be a positive tailwind for really all of our businesses that are selling there. And then gas turbine is really a global market, so the turbines are going—you know, the order might be placed in Europe, it might be built in China, and it might be shipped to the Middle East. But that one, gas turbine, is in a strong cycle up into fiscal ’13, as it was in fiscal ’12, so the sales there could show up in Europe, gas turbine sale, but it could be going somewhere else. But the sales will be recorded where the customer places the order.

Okay. So between Europe and Asia, though, I mean, we obviously are showing at least mid-single digit growth in each of those regions?

Yes.

I’m trying to figure it out with the gas turbine, but—

Oh, I understand.

I think the way we’re looking at it sort of by region, Rick, and I mentioned sort of our view on the Americas, we do see Asia recovering. I mean, in China the conditions will continue to recover, maybe slowly I think I said in my comments—

Yes, you did.

--for the first half of our fiscal year. That’s going to help our business in China and in Japan and in South Korea because a lot of our equipment customers are there. So through fiscal ’13, we see conditions continuing to get better in Asia generally. In Europe, we see some moderation, so not quite as strong as we saw in fiscal ’12 but not a train wreck either, so.

Okay, okay. I can work with that. And then just lastly, real simple question – in terms of your EPS guidance for fiscal ’13, is the share base assumption around, like, 148? I mean, is it basically assuming 2% of the shares outstanding bought back?

Yeah, the guidance assumes the more long term view of the 2%.

Okay, great. Thank you so much.

Ladies and gentlemen, if there are any additional questions, please press the star followed by the one at this time. Again as a reminder, if you are on speaker phone, you’ll need to lift the handset first before making your selection. And our next question does come from the line of Gary Farber with CL King.

Yeah, good morning. Just a couple questions. I think you gave a number, what, 120 some-odd distributors that you’d picked up?

Yeah, 126.

And that was in the quarter?

Yes.

How would that compare to other quarters? Is that consistent or different?

It was a pretty good quarter. It was maybe just a tick higher than what we had the last quarter, but within the range on the full year.

And then just on the aftermarket, in the press release, I don’t know if you’d talked about this before – the 6% globally was stronger in North America. Did you talk at all about the growth rates in the other areas, like Europe and Asia, for aftermarket in the quarter?

Gary, this is Rich again. In local currency terms, I think Bill mentioned that Europe aftermarket was up just a little over 1%, and in Asia Pacific it was down almost 5%.

Right, okay. All right, thanks.

And at this time, there are no further questions. I would like to turn the call back over to Bill Cook for any closing comments.

Thanks, Craig. Now to conclude our call, I’d like to thank everyone for your time and continued interest in our company. I would like to especially thank my 13,600 fellow employees for their efforts and contributions in creating the record results we just delivered in fiscal ’12. This quarter demonstrates further significant progress in our execution of our strategic growth plan with the objectives of building our company into first a 3 billion and then a $5 billion filter company. Thank you all and have a great day.

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude the conference for today. If you would like to listen to a replay of this conference, you may do so by dialing either 303-590-3030 or 1-800-406-7325. You will need to enter the access code of 4552840 followed by the pound sign. Those telephone numbers once again 303-590-3030 or 1-800-406-7325, with the access code of 4552840 followed by the pound. Again, we do thank you for your time. Have a pleasant day.