Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Endava First Quarter Fiscal Year 2020 Results Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker’s presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker for today, Laurence Madsen, Investor Relations, please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to Endava's first quarter of fiscal year 2020 earnings conference call. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. Joining me today are John Cotterell, Endava's Chief Executive Officer; and Mark Thurston, Endava's Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin a quick reminder to our listeners. Our remarks today include forward-looking statements, including our guidance for Q2 fiscal year 2020 and the full fiscal year 2020 and other forward-looking statements. These statements are subject to risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Actual results and the timing of certain events may differ materially from the results or timing predicted or implied by such forward-looking statements and reported results should not be considered as an indication of future performance. Please note that these forward-looking statements made during this conference call speak only as of today’s date and the Company undertakes no obligation to update them, to reflect subsequent events or circumstances or other event to the extent required by law. Please refer to our SEC filings, as well as our financial results, press release for a more detailed description of the risk factors that may affect our results. Also during the call, we’ll present both IFRS and non-IFRS financial measures. A reconciliation of non-IFRS to IFRS measures is included in today's earnings press release, which you can find on our Investor Relations website. A link to the replay of this call will also be available there. With that, I'll turn the call over to John.

Thank you, Laurence, and thank youall very much for joining us today. Mark and I are pleased to be here to provide an update on our business and financial performance for the three months ended September the 30, 2019. Endava had another record quarter for quarter one fiscal year 2020 with revenue of £82.4 million, a strong growth of 24% year-on-year from £66.4 million in the same period in the prior year. Our strong revenue growth is driven by the expansion of our existing customers and the acquisition of new ones during the quarter. We continue to broaden our client base and ended the quarter with 278 active clients, up from 262 at the end of the same period in the prior year. The total number of clients who generated revenue over £1 million pounds on a rolling 12 months basis was 62, an increase of 19% over the same period of the prior year and we continue to grow the number of clients generating over £2 million on a rolling 12 months basis. This growth increased by 50% from the same period last year to 45. In the last quarter, we grew in all of our regions and verticals. We had strong revenue growth along with continued improvement in our operating margins. As of this quarter, we will report our revenue from the Rest of the World. In quarter one, fiscal year 2020, the Rest of the World accounted for 2% of revenue. It is small but fast growing. The Rest of the World includes companies located in Hong Kong, Japan and the Middle East. On the technology front, we see several trends continuing to develop in parallel streams, often within the same organizations. Our clients are demonstrating an increasing desire to bring their IT and business organizations closer…

Thanks, John. Endava’s revenue totaled £82.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2019m compared to £66.4 million in the same period last year, a 24.0% increase over the same period in the prior year. In constant currency, our revenue growth rate was 21.5%. As John mentioned the sale of “the Captive,” to Worldpay closed on August 31, 2019 and this means the current quarter reported had one less month’s contribution from the Captive than the comparative period. Our adjusted profit before tax for the three months ended September 30, 2019 was £16.9 million, compared to £11.7 million for the same period last year, a 45.0% year-over-year increase. Our adjusted profit before tax margin was 20.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2019, compared to 17.6% for the same period last year. The year-over-year improvement in our adjusted profit before tax margin is mainly due to a continued positive pricing environment and one-off IFRS-16 contribution for sublet rental income related to sale of “the Captive,” to Worldpay. Excluding the contribution from the sale of “the Captive,”, our adjusted profit before tax margin would have been 19.9%. Adjusted profit before tax is defined as the company's profit before tax for the period adjusted to exclude the impact of share-based compensation expense, amortization of acquired intangible assets, realized and unrealized foreign currency exchange gains and losses, initial public offering expenses incurred, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance readiness expenses, fair-value movement of contingent consideration, and gain on disposal of subsidiary, all of which are non-cash other than realized foreign currency exchange gains and losses, initial public offering expenses, Sarbanes-Oxley compliance readiness expenses and gain on disposal of subsidiary. Adjusted PBT margin is calculated as a percentage of our total revenue. Our adjusted diluted EPS was £0.24 for the three months ended September 30, 2019…

[Operator Instructions] Bryan Bergin with Cowen. Your line is open.

Hi. Thank you. Wanted to start with Intuitus. Can you comment on the scale of that business? Just trying to connect the change in guidance on a constant-currency basis attributable to that versus the organic? And then also comment on just the planned go-to-market strategy with that [add any] [ph]?

Hi, Bryan. Thanks for that. Yes. So, Intuitus for us is all around our focus on private equity building their relationships with these guys who end up owning a number of portfolio companies and then driving the downstream transformation opportunities that will come out of it. So, the major benefit that we see to Endava as a business will be through the leverage that comes from those relationships with the PE owners. It's actually in revenue terms it's less than 2% of the Endava revenue. So the impact on us is very, very low in terms of actually driving direct revenue, it is much more about that leverage through the customer relationships that we can get.

Okay. Makes sense. And then, on the TMT vertical, can you just comment on what you're seeing in that industry vertical? I think it ticked down this quarter. What are your opportunities to just drive that back to higher growth levels?

Yes, so, I mean, obviously across our verticals, we're seeing continued strength in payment and financial services and obviously as well from the numbers other continues to step up very strongly. TMT remain strong for us. It's just not as strong as we're getting in the other - in the other areas. Actually with TMT, a lot of the strength is in the U.S. rather than in Europe, which is which is good news for us. And as we continue to get the results of the investment that we've made in the sales teams across the U.S., we think that will pull through on the TMT side, as well.

Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Bryan.

Maggie Nolan with William Blair your line is open.

Thank you. I wanted to talk about the delivery locations. Just given that you're breaking out Rest of World now. Are there future delivery locations that you feel need to be broken out? And then also in that same vein, just given that, Velocity Partners is well integrated into the business at this point. Can you comment on how you've done in terms of growing Latin America as a delivery center?

Sure, I mean obviously we're breaking out Rest of the World from a revenue perspective and as with our previous expansions into new areas of geography, we tend to lead on client relationships and revenue before investing behind that in terms of delivery locations. Rest of the World we pulled out because it's hit that sort of 2% mark and it's moving quite strongly. Largely, it's being payments and financial services and it's mainly been the existing client relationships where someone has moved from an existing client in Europe or North America into the Rest of the World and then has taken us with them into their new role. Now if you look at it from a delivery locations point of view, obviously, our strategy is to have near shore similar time zone delivery capability to the majority of our clients. So as that Rest of the World which is Southeast Asia and Middle East at the moment, as that builds and grows we will be looking to establish delivery capability in the Asia-Pac region. But not, not imminently would be my call on that. We want to see the client revenues grow a little bit more before we do that. What was the second part of your question?

The success building out Latin America the delivery locations and that’s a bit newer geography for you?

Right, yes. So, yes so, the Velocity deal has, actually, Mark has got some numbers.

Yes, I think - we'll continue to sort of grow LATAM. So, our headcount is up in the region. So, we closed Q4 about 780. We've moved that number up sort of 6% sequentially quarter-on-quarter. So, we're making great inroads into that territory in supporting our growth in North America as we sort of pointed out and our revenues grew 25% year-on-year. So good progress, I would say

Yes, and just a little bit of color on that. The two main areas - the two main countries we’ve grown in are in Colombia and Argentina both of which have very good delivery culture and mindset. Very, very well aligned with the way in which in Endava operates now. And I see that growth that Mark has just calling out as coming out of that good integration that we've had.

Thank you. And then, on the margins, can you break down some of the puts and takes of the margin strength at both the gross and adjusted PBT level?

Sure. So on the gross margin, we had a strong results on an adjusted basis we’re 42.7. So, 42.8, sorry, which was up from where we were in Q4. We benefited basically from continued pricing and rates. Utilization did come off somewhat as we sort of flagged in the previous sort of call. So, through the course of 2019, we've been operating at elevated levels of utilization which is above 70% for that for us and that has come down to a more normalized levels currently. So that mitigated some of the strength that we saw in the positive pricing environment. But similarly, once we also got the advantage of the gross margin, which is about a percentage point SG&A was also lower than anticipated and there is a number of small items behind that. We do believe that we have further public company costs to come in. We suspect that we were going to have to put some further work in into our Sarbanes-Oxley because of the size of the free float at the moment. So that roughly took us up a good sort of 2.5 percentage points over Q4. And then, we received a one-off gain as a result basically of implementing IFRS-16 which grosses up the balance sheet for many proxy leases. That gain came about, because of the Captive. So, we recognized assets onto the balance sheet. And because the [sublet] [ph] income was the slight margin on it, it actually produced the gain when we do recognize it and recognized the sub lease income as a financial asset in the balance sheet and that's approximately 0.6% of the rise. So the adjusted PBT margin for the quarter is exceptionally strong at 20.5%. I sort of pointed out that 0.6 of that is due to IFRS-16 and this Captive gain. So that takes down to about 19.9. And whilst we're seeing a positive pricing environment I expect utilization to come down a little bit during Q2 to a more normalized level. And so, I think you could read in Q1 was a pretty exceptional for us and that we should get down to a more normalized level adjusted PBT margin.

Thank you.

Bryan Keane with Deutsche Bank, your line is open.

Good morning to us out here and good afternoon to you guys. I wanted to ask on Payments and Financial Services, it continues to be robust area for you guys. Is there any callouts in specific areas that you guys are seeing extra demand? Actually curious a little bit about blockchain. Are you seeing a pickup in demand there in particular?

Yes, so, more generally, in the Financial Services arena, payments continues to be a very, very strong area for us. It’s enabling us to expand geographically. So some of the Rest of the World work has been in the Payment space, as well as doubling down with existing clients and seeing large expansion there and that continues to be in the traditional areas around acquiring merchant portals, clearing and so on. Other areas where we've seen activity have been insurance. Insurance is building up strongly for us. Asset and Wealth Management continues to see a lot of activity, partly driven by regulatory changes in that market segment, but also some of the sort of next-gen banking challenges, open banking and so on is also driving expansion in that space. Specifically, on blockchain and actually we are seeing some things get into production environments. But most of what we are seeing on blockchain is more at the proof-of-concept and prototyping level. We are seeing quite a lot of activity in that as in three or four clients working around blockchain challenges in the exchanges space increasing the security of interaction around exchanges. Outside of the Payments and Financial Services area, the largest area of activity we see is in the Logistics space. Once again around shipping goods and being able to track and undertake all of the customers and so on activities around Logistics.

Okay. That's helpful. And then, wanted to ask about the Bain & Company partnership. Is there a way to think about how much revenue that contributes - the partnership contributes for you guys? And then, going forward now, with this additional announcement, is there a growth rate or way to think about how big this business could be with Bain combined?

So, I mean, the relationship with Bain continues to strengthen both in the PE space that I covered in the opening remarks, but also in the wider areas around digital transformation and some of the work that we do with them around, product that they can then take to their clients. We are continuing to win new logos together and the number of clients there we're working alongside each other expanding. It’s quite difficult to separate out and measure, because we find ourselves in situations where are the incumbent and a client and we introduced Bain to do what they do well, where they're an incumbent and they introduce us. We also find ourselves in situations where we operate in sub-contract to Bain. So actually, being able to separate out and measure as a proportion of Endava’s business where and how all of that has occurred is quite difficult for us. What I can say is, where we are in sub-contractor to Bain. They are one of the clients that are in the greater than 1 million turnover category now.

Okay, great. Thanks for the help.

Ashwin Shirvaikar with Citi. Your line is open

Thank you. Good morning folks.

Hi, Ashwin.

My first – yes, hi. My first question is, John, you mentioned during these architecture reviews and so on and so forth, you mentioned a little bit about the downstream opportunity. Can you maybe provide more details with regards to – are you already beginning to see that downstream opportunity emerge? And would you, in general, expect sort of some kind of an acceleration in the size of relationships, size of contracts to emerge from this?

So, at a headline level, yes, we are seeing the downstream opportunities and yes, we are converting some of them. I think, Ashwin, from what you know about us, there has always been a reasonably significant proportion of Endava’s revenue that's come through these PE client relationships. And during the transformation, the platform transformation work that is needed as part of those clients’ investment thesis. So, the work we're doing with Bain and the Intuitus acquisition is both in the PE space about widening those PE relationships and the conversations that we can have with the owners of these businesses, so that we can help them create their thesis around technology transformation and the value creation of the platform that they get out of that. But then execute on it once they've acquired the businesses. So, we have a significant number of portfolio companies and we might dig into that number for you next time where we are working with the portfolio companies on transformation. With the Intuitus guys as I mentioned a moment ago we're already seeing downstream transformation leads coming through the relationships that they have at that level.

Got it. And broader than that, are you currently leaving revenue growth opportunity sort of untapped because of supply constraints we do hear that, from others in the space? In other words can you grow faster if you wanted to?

I mean, I think, we never tap into a 100% of the opportunity in front of us, because it's more about being able to get the teams together in a timely fashion for clients than around the general recruitment and retention. Our ability to recruit remains strong. Our retention is high. You can see that in our attrition figures which is continuing to trend down. And in the locations where we are operating, we broadly are able to draw in the talent that we need to meet our top-line. But as I said, it's never 100% of that you get through that.

Right. So, I guess, partly, where I was going with that was the headcount growth in quarter, I think might be the lowest you have ever reported. I might then assume that that is a temporary circumstance and we should see headcount growth to reaccelerate?

So, I think on the headcount point, you need to take account of the disposal of Worldpay. So, John called out 13.9%, it's nearly 17% when you call out – do on a like-for-like basis. And then, you compare that with the growth that we had year-on-year which is constant-currency at 21.5%, then it's broadly similar. So you've got two percentage points sort of differential. So, they – I don't think we are sort of constrained. I think the – our utilization, as we sort of been trailing was elevated last year. They are starting to trend that bound to a more normalized level. So, the headcount growth is what we require basically to deliver sustainable margin going forward.

Understood. Thank you.

Thanks Ashwin.

Charlie Brennan with Credit Suisse. Your line is open.

Great. Thanks guys for taking the questions. Just two actually. Firstly, coming back on the margin point, you continue to callout favorable pricing. Is there a way for us to think about how much of your existing book of business you've been able to re-price? And how much more of a future benefit is that going to be? And then, secondly, back on this Intuitus deal, it looks like they are a mid-market specialist. And I typically think about you servicing larger clients. Have I misrepresented Intuitus? And how do you feel about the mid-market space?

Why don’t you do the first one, Mark?

Yes, so, pricing, it does continue to be favorable for us. We certainly say in terms of the metrics that can be calculated in terms of revenue per head. So, there is a healthy sequential increase quarter-on-quarter albeit a little bit flatter by the FX rates. But we definitely see it on a like-for-like basis in our day rates or revenue per man day rates. So it is a benign environment and we have continued to see this momentum through 2019 and so far the outlook into 2020 that we could say, it also remains benign. In terms of the repricing, I guess, you're referring to renewal conversations with clients. So, I think we said in the past that we tend to get premium pricing when we secure new work for clients because of the scarcity of the work that the talent and expertise that we bring. But we still managed to secure meaningful rate increases when we come to renew with our clients that we've been in situ with for quite some time. So, we are benefiting from that that positive pricing environment. It’s basically I think a consequence of where we operate in a market. At the moment, we are not seeing any sort of weakness at the moment.

Right. And on your Intuitus question, yes, they've been focused around mid-market. They are moving up into a little bit more of the top-tier. It does actually complement very, very well what we do with Bain, which is very much focused on the top-tier global PE firms. And actually through the delivery model because they have access to a 100 C-suite level freelancers in the business. So it provides us with a huge amount of extra flexibility to respond to demand in this space. The challenge in the space is that demand comes along very, very quickly. So a client who call up and go I need a team on Monday to have a look at this prospective acquisition. And the senior level of freelancers will enable us to respond not just through the existing client base, the Intuitus hub, but also much more effectively working alongside Bain where frankly we've been turning work away.

Great. Thank you.

Thanks Charlie

Mayank Tandon with Needham and Company. Your line is open.

Thank you. Could you comment on attrition where it is today? And how does it compare to, say six, twelve months ago? You mentioned that it has been downticking. So, I would love to get some perspective on that. And in the same vein if you could talk about your expectations for wage inflation and how you see that rolling through the year?

Yes, attrition has been coming down. I mean, we target staying below 15%, which we which we've remained below the entire period on the public market. But it did a jump towards it at one point about a year and a half ago. And it has been trending down steadily since then to probably a couple of percentage points off that peak.

Could you just guide us…

I didn't catch the second question actually, Mayank.

Right, Mark. I was asking about the wage inflation. How you see that rolling through the year. The impact that you expect. Maybe if you could talk about it in terms of some of your core markets how does that flow through the model?

So, we always have a competition for talent always is as high as John sort of said. But actually our ability to recruit at a sensible price point is undiminished. And I know we've actually attributed this to the successful business that we've built, the brand attracts at a time which means that we don't have to pay market-leading salaries to attract that talent. And you can see that with the attrition rates where they are that we are doing a good job on that. In terms of the cost going forward in terms of an average cost per head is basically at the levels that we have seen sort of historically where we managed the cost base certainly delivery cost base through - let's call it a pyramid structure where basically people come into the organization and develop skills and expertise that they are able - we are able then to pass onto our clients as they increase their seniority through sort of Endava. So, we tend to get a margin diminution when we do our primary pay round which is first of January. But then, as we go through renewal conversations with clients, we tend to recover back cost through the balance of the year. So, we're not seeing any margin pressure really from the cost of securing talent.

That’s helpful. And then if I could ask one more in terms of just competition as you scaled and I would imagine are competing on larger opportunities in the market. How has the competitive landscape changed for you if at all?

So the competitive landscape continues to be fairly similar as it's always a competitive market. The larger players that we run up against are Accenture and EPAM. They are probably the most common two that we see. But demand is strong and there is good opportunities with the client base. And so, we continue to win well across the portfolio and sectors driving the top-line growth that you see.

Excellent. Thank you.

Joseph Foresi with Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is open.

Hi. Most of my questions have been answered as you guys can imagine. But, the first one, I'd like to start with is, just around inorganic growth. Obviously, you did sort of a smaller tuck-in acquisition. But you've created some more flexibility on the balance sheet. I know to the extent that what - to the extent that you could talk about it, maybe you can spread some light on - or shed some light on potential acquisition targets. Would you be looking to do something smaller or larger tuck-in in nature transformative? And any particular vertical that you might be looking at?

So, yes, we continue to look for the right source of inorganic acquisition opportunities. They will very much fit in line with the strategy that we previously articulated to market around tuck-in opportunities that we can integrate closely into the business. We are looking for opportunities that are going to add either sector or technology capability to the business, but may also add some delivery capability if we are looking at new geographies, for instance when we get to wanting delivery capability in Asia-Pac, we may well look at an acquisition to assist us in doing that. We are we are actively looking as I called out in the last quarter and as opportunities come through, we will close with them and announce them to market.

Got it. And then, kind of building on Mayank’s question, just on the political climate in the regions that you're servicing from the Ukraine and Latin America, there's been obviously a lot of turmoil in the global political arena. Maybe you could talk about any impact that you're seeing there, anything that you are monitoring from a delivery perspective. I'd love to get your feedback on that.

Okay. So, I mean, the first thing to say is we are not in the Ukraine or Russia for that matter.

I am sorry, I meant Romania. I apologize.

Yes. So, largely, we've gone for places that they offer opportunity to establish a leading position and attract great staff, because they are not the Silicon Valley's and established parts of the world. Now we've adopted in our approach is choosing locations that are emerging, but not too politically sensitive. So, Romania, for instance, as you call out is within the European Union. And that’s being maturing strongly as a nation since they joined the European Union back in 2007. So, we plough a path around not finding ourselves strongly with strong delivery locations in highly politically sensitive territories and that's how we manage that political risk.

Got it. And then, just a last one from me around margins. Do you foresee a time where you may review the margin profile over the long-term? How should we think about sort of - I know it's been asked a couple different ways, but, do you review that on an annual basis? Will you review it again in 2020, because obviously the margins could potentially, at least they appear like they should or could potentially expand at some point?

Yes. I think that's a good point. I think, at the moment, it's a little bit too early to call or you just said we just delivered 20.5% and that was one also contributed to that. And we certainly came into the IPO with a target margin of 17% and we've done better than that almost every quarter since. I would prefer to make that call as we get towards March next year when we see Q3 as I said, our utilization has come down from the elevated levels that we had to in close of 2019. So that they are normal range of operation and we're still generating strong gross margin, because of the - probably because of the pricing sort of environment. I think we need to also establish what our go ahead level of SG&A is and then as we leverage, we should get some traction in reducing that as a percentage of revenue. So, I think it’s probably about six months away to be frank, Joe, before we sort of call out any change.

Got it. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Arvind Ramnani with Keybanc. Your line is open.

Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I'll ask another question on the on the private equity Bain partnership. And my question on that is, how are you organized from a sales perspective? Is it something that you as senior management kind of look selectively and plan out course of action? Or do you do you have dedicated kind of sales teams on that - on the opportunity related to Bain?

So we have a steering grid that we operate with Bain, which includes myself and senior Bain leadership team folks. And the amount and level of activity is fairly broad. So, we draw in the relevant business winning teams from Endava and Bain on an opportunity-by-opportunity basis in order to close business together, win alongside each other and so on. And that works - that works very well. We've been doing that for around two years now and going down the learning curve of how we win together. And it's reached that point where it's scaled across both organizations, let me describe it that way where lots of people on each side are involved in executing against it.

Terrific. And then, just a quick follow-up on the on the same topic. Do you have any kind of rules on engagement around - essentially kind of conflict where you're going in helping potential competitor of one of their clients or has that – are you really haven’t run into such situations?

So it's a very open relationship where we are not restricting each other particularly. So, if Bain introduces somewhere or we introduce them, we don't restrict downstream behavior to being alongside walk through each other. But we have a clear preference to actually work together and like these things happen together, because we believe that, when you put the technology and the organizational and commercial capabilities across our two organizations that we have together in a structured fashion, you get a much more powerful results than the client can get just by put in two organizations with base capabilities alongside each other who have never worked together before. It's the nature of technology, how do you actually get that dimension of change that, that ideation of what's going to make a difference into the sort of strategy and organizational change discussions. And if you don't have operating closely enough together, it's tough to work.

Great. And if I can squeeze one last one?

Sorry, go ahead.

Great. And if I can squeeze one last one, and is on the topic of automation. I mean, I know you kind of talk about it a lot and within the industry itself. But if you can kind of just give us a view of…

Sorry – did we lose you? What’s that?

The questioner has dropped.

Okay.

There are no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to presenters for final remarks Okay. Thank you all for joining the call and I hope that you've picked up through it on our continued optimism about our ability to deliver sustainable growth going forward. And we look forward to speaking to you all again next quarter. Thank you.

This concludes the Endava first quarter fiscal year 2020 results conference call. We thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.