Good afternoon, and welcome ladies and gentlemen, to Cytokinetics' First Quarter 2020 Conference Call. At this time, I'd like to inform you that this call is being recorded, and that all participants are in a listen-only mode. At the company's request we will open the call for question-and-answers after the presentation. I'll now turn the call over to Diane Weiser, Cytokinetics' Senior Vice President of Corporate Communications and Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon, and thanks for joining us on the call today. Robert Blum, our President and Chief Executive Officer, will kick off the call with an overview of the quarter and the impact of COVID-19 on certain clinical trials. Then Fady Malik, our EVP of Research and Development, will provide updates on key developments for omecamtiv mecarbil, our cardiac myosin activator, and AMG 594, our cardiac troponin activator, both under our collaboration with Amgen. Next, Stuart Kupfer our SVP and Chief Medical Officer will update on recent progress with CK-274, our wholly-owned cardiac myosin inhibitor now in Phase II, and CK-271, our additional cardiac myosin inhibitor. Then Robert Wong, our VP and Chief Accounting Officer, will provide a financial overview for the quarter, and Ching Jaw, our SVP and Chief Financial Officer, will discuss corporate development strategies before Robert Blum provides concluding thoughts on the company's outlook, including an update on reldesemtiv, our fast skeletal muscle component activator, as well as expected key milestones for the remainder of the year. Please note that portions of the following discussion, including our responses to questions, contain statements that relate to future events and performance rather than historical facts and constitute forward-looking statements. Examples of such statements include that are not limited to statements related to the potential impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our research and development activities and business operations, including our anticipated cash expenditures during the 2020 calendar year, statements relating to Cytokinetics and its partners' research and development and commercial readiness activities including the initiation, conduct, design, enrollment, progress continuation, completion timing and results of clinical trials. Our actual results might differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Additional information concerning factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in these forward-looking statements is contained in our SEC filings. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after this call. And now, I will turn the call over to Robert.

Thank you, Diane. And thanks again to everyone, for joining us on the call today. I want to begin today's call by extending to you and your families our wishes for safety, health and wellbeing during these unprecedented and uncertain times. Our top priority has been the health, safety and wellbeing of our employees, clinical trial participants and business and community partners. In accordance with California and Bay area shelter-in-place orders, our employees have been and continue to work primarily from home. As such, all business travel has been suspended and we have been participating in medical and investor conferences virtually, as many of you have. During this time, we are doing all that we can to ensure that the critical work required to bring our potential medicines to patients continues. Toward that end, on today's call, we'll update you on progress during the quarter and specifically how the COVID-19 pandemic has and has not impacted our business and operations. While we have made the decision to temporarily suspend enrollment in certain of our clinical trials, we are still on track to report topline results from GALACTIC-HF in Q4. Fady will elaborate on that key strategic objective in a moment. We hit the ground running in 2020 with a busy and productive first quarter. As we previously stated, our primary focus this year is our cardiovascular pipeline, which now includes four drug candidates advancing in all stages of development. The most notable achievements during the quarter centered around GALACTIC-HF, one of the largest Phase 3 global cardiovascular outcome studies in heart failure, which has been conducted by Amgen under our long standing collaboration. These recent achievements included, firstly, the publication of the design manuscript for the trial. Next our passing through the second and final planned interim analysis of GALACTIC-HF,…

Thanks, Robert. As Robert summarized, under our collaboration with Amgen, we accomplished several significant goals during the first quarter, including publication of the design manuscript for GALACTIC-HF and JACC: Heart Failure, passing through the second and final planned interim analysis conducted by the data monitoring committee, and most recently presenting the baseline characteristics and demographics of patients enrolled in this trial. Since I covered the previous two milestones during our Q4 earnings call, I'll focus today on some key takeaways from the baseline characteristics of GALACTIC-HF, as well as how Amgen is proceeding to facilitate continuity of the trial, and reporting its topline results in Q4, 2020. As intended, patients enrolled in GALACTIC-HF represent a heart failure population at risk for cardiovascular events, despite being well-treated on standard of care therapy. The baseline patient characteristics of this trial describe a balanced representation from countries around the world, and from both inpatient and outpatient treatment settings. As you'll recall, all outpatients in GALACTIC-HF were required to have a prior hospitalization within a year. The actual median time from last hoc heart failure hospitalization or ER visits for heart failure in GALACTIC-HF is three months, consistent with the recruitment of a population higher risk for re-hospitalization or cardiovascular death. In addition, as I'll remind you, 25% of the patients were randomized during their index heart failure hospitalization. Accordingly, they represent a somewhat sicker and more symptomatic patient group, as reflected by their higher median NT-proBNP, as well as their lower blood pressures, estimated glomerular filtration rate and baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Scores. The data also show that adherence to standard of care background medical therapy in GALACTIC-HF is quite good, with 94% of patients on beta blockers, 87% on renin angiotensin system blockers and 77% on a mineralocorticoid antagonist. Additionally, many…

Thanks Fady. As you may know, our cardiac myosin inhibitor program includes CK-274 and CK-271. I'll begin with an update on site activation, screening and enrollment and REDWOOD-HCM, the Phase 2 clinical trial of CK-274, for the potential treatment of obstructive HCM and then provide an update on our preparedness for the Phase 1 study of CK-271. In response to the coronavirus pandemic, Cytokinetics has created an internal task force, specifically for clinical trials, and has activated a business continuity plan for ongoing trials. We are in communication with our CROs and other vendors regarding their business continuity plans, and have been tracking the clinical trial site policies regarding ongoing research and access to the hospital. As with METEORIC-HF to protect the safety and health of clinical trial participants, and healthcare professionals, we've temporarily suspended enrollment in REDWOOD-HCM. However, we've been working with sites to enable provision of investigational product to patients already enrolled in the trial, and accommodate remote visits where possible. In the meantime, we're continuing to work internally with our CROs, vendors and sites to activate new sites, with the goal of activating over 20 new sites throughout North America and Europe. I'll remind you that for this trial, we will be activating more sites and the number of patients required in each cohort. So we remain optimistic that data from Cohort 1 may be available by yearend, if enrollment in this first cohort can be completed by midyear. As Robert mentioned, preclinical results for CK-274 were presented at the recent Biophysical Society Annual Meeting. These data demonstrated that CK-274 reduces cardiac myosin activity in vitro, and importantly, does not inhibit the activity of smooth muscle myosin, which is supportive of its selectivity for cardiac myosin. The study results also indicated that CK-274 has an allosteric binding site distinct from Mavacamten, which may differentiate the pharmacodynamics features of these two promising drug candidates. Moving to CK-271, our additional cardiac myosin inhibitor. We're pleased to announce that our IND was both submitted and accepted during the first quarter, and we've begun to engage in study start-up activities for a Phase 1 study of CK-271 in healthy volunteers. The primary objective of this first in human Phase 1 study is to assess the safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetics of single ascending oral doses of CK-271 on healthy adult subjects. We remain optimistic we can start this study during the second quarter, but as whether other trials start of this study will depend on evolving conditions at our study site. And with that, I'll turn it over to Robert Wong, who will provide an update on our financials.

Thanks, Stuart. I'll first provide an update on cash revenue and spending, and then Ching will review our 2020 financial guidance and corporate development strategy. More details on our actual results for the first quarter 2020 are included in the press release, which was released earlier this afternoon. We ended the first quarter with approximately $237 million in cash and investment. Our revenue in Q1, 2020 came from our strategic alliances with Amgen and Astellas. For Amgen, we recognize revenue associated with their reimbursement of our development expenses related to METEORIC-HF. For Astellas, we recognize revenue for the reimbursement of expenses related to our scientists engaged in collaborative research. Our first quarter 2020 R&D expenses decreased to $21.7 million from $23.5 million in the first quarter of 2019, primarily due to lower spending related to our neuromuscular development activity, with the completion of FORTITUDE-ALS in 2019, offset by increased activity related to both METEORIC-HF and REDWOOD-HCM in 2020. More than half of our R&D expenses were attributable to our cardiovascular programs, as expected given activity for METEORIC-HF and the cardiac myosin inhibitor program. And the remainder of our expenses were attributable primarily to our early research activity. Our first quarter 2020 G&A expenses were $12.4 million, up from $9.4 million in Q1, 2019, due primarily to higher personnel related costs, including stock-based compensation and higher outside services. And now, Ching will review our guidance for 2020 and highlight our corporate development strategy.

Thanks Robert. The company continues to project cash revenue for 2020 will be in the range of $18 million to $22 million. Operating expenses will be in the range of $120 million to $130 million. And net cash utilization for the full year will be between $105 million and $115 million. Given the coronavirus and potential impacts to the clinical studies and operations, we are monitoring our spending and may update financial guidance later in the year, if it looks like our spending might change. During the quarter, we continue to pursue opportunities for project financing, role demonetization and partnerships to expand development of our cardiac sarcomere inhibitor programs, and to further extend our cash runway. Advancement of REDWOOD-HCM and Phase 1 study of CK-271 provide momentum to these discussions. In addition, we are eligible for approximately $100 million in milestone payments under our collaboration with Amgen over the next 12 to 18 months, assuming positive results from GALACTIC-HF. We are fortunate to be in a strong financial position, especially given the uncertainties in today's equity capital markets. And we continue to make strides to ensure that we prudently deploy capital against our prioritized clinical programs to maximize shareholder returns. And with that, I'll turn the call back over to Robert Blum.

Thank you, Ching. These are truly extraordinary times, but Cytokinetics has persevered through business challenges in the past. And as we have done before, our employees are rising to the occasion, focusing forward and keeping their health and our mission top of mind. I'm extremely proud of the camaraderie and collaboration we've demonstrated internally and with our business partners. Despite these newer challenges, our commitment to our pioneering science and to patients has not changed and our dedication has not faltered. We remain optimistic for what may prove to be a transformational year for the company, and we're pleased that our most valuable program omecamtiv mecarbil remains on track for topline registration trial results in Q4 later this year. Additionally, I want to provide an update on reldesemtiv and our collaboration with Astellas. Recently, we issued an 8-K related to our entry into agreements, which taken together, amend and restate our research, development and commercialization collaboration agreement with Astellas. And follow-up to our previously disclosed agreement in principle, these amendments provide Cytokinetics with the exclusive control and responsibility for the development and commercialization of CK-601 and other fast skeletal regulatory activator compounds. Astellas agreed to pay certain costs up to $12 million, which may be incurred in connection with Cytokinetics potential Phase 3 clinical trial of reldesemtiv and ALS, which we estimate could cost between approximately $30 million to $40 million amortized over several years. Astellas has also agreed to non-cash contributions to Cytokinetics, including the transfer of its inventories of active pharmaceutical ingredient of reldesemtiv and CK-601 and the continued conduct of ongoing stability studies at its cost. In return, Cytokinetics would pay Astellas a low to mid-single digit royalty on sales of reldesemtiv in certain countries, if commercialized. Moreover, Astellas extended the joint research program with Cytokinetics through…

[Operator Instructions] We will go to our first question from the line of Charles Duncan from Cantor Fitzgerald.

Hello, Charles.

Hey, it’s actually Steve on for Charles. How are you?

Very good. Thank you. How are you?

Good. Congratulations for all that successfully completed in this quarter and glad to hear that you reaffirm a GALACTIC is on track to record topline data later this year. The question I have is given the recent approval of a Farxiga for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, just want to get your perspective on the market opportunity and the unmet need. And in addition, regarding omecamtiv, which clearly has a differentiated mechanism of action, how do you believe it will be perceived in the market?

Very good question. I'll answer and then also ask Fady to elaborate. With regard to that new drug approved for the treatment of heart failure and reduced ejection fraction just yesterday, as you know, it's been available for the treatment of patients with diabetes for a number of years. And it has demonstrated now, more recently, impressive activity for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. We think that it's going to contribute to increased education and awareness of still the very high-unmet need in the treatment of heart failure, and the importance of new mechanisms to bring down the high-morbidity and mortality. Also, we believe it will contribute to aluminate what may be the benefit of enhancing cardiac muscle function with omecamtiv mecarbil as pertains to potentially complimentary therapies. With that, I'll turn it over to Fady to elaborate.

Yes. I think, DAPA-HF, I mean, dapagliflozin Farxiga represents an advance in heart failure. But even in that trial where patients were well-treated and other standard of care, and it represented a lower risk population potentially, you still had event rates for CV death, mortality that is of 7% to 8% per year. For perspective, that's three times higher than the event rate that you see in large [Indiscernible] sclerosis trials and so forth. And we expect and if you look in trial like Victoria which was reported recently, in a sicker population there, the event rates for their primary outcome were in the 30% range. So as we begin to develop and we see new approvals for medicines, in heart failure, the clinical need is still overwhelming in this area, represents enormous financial burden to our society and is one of the most common conditions in people that are in middle aged or above. So we think only cancer will be come if GALACTIC-HF readout in a positive way has the potential to become part of this foundation for heart failure. And one of the challenges, I think in evolving heart failure care will be to determine the sequencing of how these medicines will be used. But we like the fact that on the omecamtiv like dapagliflozin has a very good profile in terms of it doesn't affect blood pressure, it doesn't adversely affect kidney function other things – it’s seen as relatively easy to use, which is I think why people are interested in dapagliflozin.

All right, thank you. Very informative. Congratulations, again on the quarter.

Thank you.

Thank you.

And we do have another question on the line. This question comes from the line of Salim Syed from Mizuho.

Hello, Salim.

Hey guys, this is Dennis on for Salim. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the progress so far. I had a couple of questions. First off on GALACTIC-HF, how are you guys thinking about what the clinically meaningful improvement on the primary endpoint as well as CV death?

It's a very good question. Thank you. Again, I'll start and turn it over to Fady. And Stuart if he also wants to elaborate. Well say about GALACTIC-HF is now that we have recent trials relating to Entresto, and vericiguat and DAPA, we have an opportunity to compare and contrast reductions in CV death, as well as other endpoints. But it really is an apples and oranges comparison in some respects, given that these trials enrolled at different times, and different populations with different risk criteria. With that said, I think it's reasonable to assume that an event rate reduction in the neighborhood of 10% to 20% is meaningfully important and clinically significant. And the more that is weighted to the higher end of that range with respect to CV death the more it gets even significantly high visibility amongst the clinical community. We're not going to handicap that to any specifics other than that, other than to say that GALACTIC-HF was designed very much to accrue a large number of events and a large number of CV deaths, with a high-medium duration of treatment, and with patients that are at risk, given that they have recently been hospitalized for acute heart failure, but still would be NPs in a range that suggests that they are still salvageable, if you will. And with that in mind, it's reasonable to expect that the GALACTIC-HF criteria represents a large cross section of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, and importantly, those that contribute meaningfully to not only high clinical burden, but high economic burden. With that, I'll turn it over to Fady and see how he wants to also add to that.

I think, the threshold for what people consider clinically meaningful in terms of mortality is not that dissimilar and no matter what the indication is. 10% or more is often viewed as positive effect on mortality. In the trial like GALACTIC, where the number of events is so large a difference like that would still be relatively, statistically significant. And so you have at least good certainty in terms of the veracity of that finding. And, for the combination of the two, I think, again they're in 15% to 20% or better. You look at the other heart failure therapies it’s sometimes not a question of what's clinically meaningful, but how you benchmark against the other therapies that have come before you. Stuart, I don’t know, if you have anything to add there?

Thanks, Fady. The only thing I will add is to your point that GALACTIC-HF enrolls a very high-risk population. So, while it's important to focus on the relative risk reduction, the absolute risk reduction is also important. And so it's really the total disease burden. Reducing that absolute risk reduction is also important to consider.

Got it. That's very helpful.

And we do have another question on the line. This is from the line of Joe Pantginis from H.C. Wainwright.

Hello, Joe.

Hi, everyone. Good afternoon. I hope you and all your families are doing well. I think my question I think also has to do with the good opportunity to remind about the CK-274 program. You're going to have a significant boost in visibility with the upcoming results from the EXPLORER study from Mavacamten. So, two things. First, can you remind us you do have potential financial benefit from the Mavacamten program. You do get a royalty, I believe. Can you just remind us some of the details? And then number two, I don't believe it's really a black and white outcome, the EXPLORER study how it might impact your study, or your program going forward for 274. So, if EXPLORER were to fail, there might be some obviously temporary read through on CK-274. But I'd like you maybe to discuss why that negative read through might not necessarily be necessitated because of the different therapeutic profile? Thanks.

Thank you, Joe. So, I'll talk about in a couple of ways and then turn it over to Fady. Firstly, as we hope EXPLORER is positive, we believe it can be positive. And we think this would be very important for patients, especially in validating this mechanism through to this potential indication. With that said, we are developing CK-274 and much as we have already. We intend to be good students of the data arising from EXPLORER in ways that would enable us to advance the field for the benefit of both, we hope Mavacamten and CK-247 ultimately serving patients. You're right, in that we do receive a front commercialization or royalty on Mavacamten. To be clear, low single digit royalty, but it's still appropriate in light of our participation in the launch of that company and our contribution to the synthesis of Mavacamten Cytokinetics'. With that said, we do believe CK-274 like any good next generation drug candidate was designed to have differentiating features that may afford it certain next generation properties, and to advance the clinical research, and potentially the commercialization. With that, I'll turn it over to Fady to elaborate more specifically.

Yes. Hi, Joe. I think the data will potentially going to be complex. We are optimistic about how the mechanism of action will be helpful to these patients and improve their function. And I think, in looking at the data, it'll inform us in terms of any changes we might consider in our development programs, whether they are revisions to the primary endpoint we might want to consider, and as well as to understand what the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics properties of 274, how they might play out in the context of what Mavacamten is doing in these patients. So, it's a very valuable experiment that's being…. [Technical Difficulty]

You guys still there? I think we lost Fady. Either way that was really helpful. I really appreciate it.

Sure. Thank you, Joe.

Can you guys hear me?

We can hear you now Fady.

Excuse me. We do now have one more question on the line. The next question comes from the line of Jason Butler from JMP Securities.

Hi. Thanks for taking the question. One on REDWOOD. Can you give us a sense of how far you [Technical Difficulty]?

It sounds like you broke up a little bit there, but Jason I think you said how far did we get with REDWOOD?

Well Jason seems to have muted.

Okay. So with regard to REDWOOD, we did start the trial in Q1. We were in the midst of enrolling patients and we do have patients enrolled in REDWOOD-HCM. But admittedly, we’re at the beginning of that first cohort. That first cohort is designed to enroll a total of 18 patients. And we expect by the end of Q2, we may have activated more than that number of sites. So in light of that we do believe that we can meet our goal as stipulated in our milestones for 2020. And we could be in a position if we can complete enrollment by mid-year, that we would have data from that first cohort in the second-half of the year. Jason [Technical Difficulty]

I'll just go to the next question. Next question is from the line of Chad Messer from Needham and Company.

Great. Thanks. I'll proceed hope we're all connected all right. Joe asked an interesting question about the Mavacamten data that's upcoming. I actually wanted to circle back and get your guys' opinion on something else that happened with Mavacamten and that was the maverick data in non-obstructive HCM. The last time we talked about it, I know we were looking forward to seeing how that data came out in terms of coloring your own thoughts about a non-obstructive program for 274 that data is out. It came out initially last year, but it was presented in March at the virtual ACC. Just wondering your thoughts on that and how it colors how you feel about your chances in running a non-obstructive HCM study?

We're having a problem with Robert's audio.

That's how he's about to say something. It seems Robert's audio is not coming through, his line is marked live. One second. This is the operator. All the speaker signs are still marked as open on my end, but it seems Robert Blum may have cut out on his end. I'm not sure if we can get him back, right now. One moment, just still looking into this. I do apologize for the delay.

It looks like Robert is trying to dial back in.

One moment, I'll see if I can grab his line myself. I do not see his line dime back in at this time, but I'm still keeping an eye on it.

This is Stuart, can you hear me?

Sir, we can hear you.

Yes, Stuart.

Yes. So, in response to Chads question about Maverick, we’re of course, aware of the Maverick data. And certainly it was a good proof of concept study to support utilization of a cardiac sarcomere inhibitor in a non-obstructive HCM population. And it does support our strategy for considering use of a cardiac sarcomere inhibitor in that population. So it's part of an overall strategy that we're planning. And, with the matter we're still considering what are the precise strategy and timing of when we proceed to study that population. But we thought the results were encouraging. And it's a good proof of concept.

Okay, great. Thanks. I did have just one more. I'll put it out there. And it's more of a strategic question. It may relate to some of your vision 2025 goals. Of course, as you were all aware your deal with Amgen had an option that you've exercised to co-promote and that gives you the right to field a hospital based field sales force. It's a pretty specific sales force, but just wondering how having that kind of gets into your long-term strategic goals.

So, I can take that, while Robert and Fady are trying to get back in.

Diane, can you hear me?

Fady. Yes. Do you want to take that, because I was going to jump in. But go for it.

I'll give it a shot and usually Robert is better in answering those questions. So, I think our strategy there really is looking at an institutional sales force that is able to interact with the major providers, major thought leaders, major medical centers kind of leading institutions in heart failure. That sales forces, as we said in the past enabled by Amgen. It's paid for by Amgen. It gives us a head start in developing field based sales force which obviously at the time of 274 successful would give us a head start in terms of its commercialization. So we're very pleased the way the deal had been as part of our strategy in terms of negotiating the original deal and subsequent deals to enable Cytokinetics' growth as a company into that functionality. So it fits well with our strategy of developing a cardiovascular presence really from research to the commercialization.

Hi, this is Robert. I can now hopefully be heard. I think Fady is absolutely correct. And what I'll say is this is part of a longstanding corporate development strategy at the company, where we leverage our partnerships in order to enable us access to capabilities and financials to move to the next level in our maturation as a business. And as we think about potentially co-commercializing omecamtiv mecarbil, it's part of a franchise strategy directed to institutional care specialty cardiology segments, where our sales force alongside of that of Amgen would be co-promoting omecamtiv in North America. And on a basis by which Amgen is reimbursing certain of our costs, that should be enabling of us to get to positive marketing contribution, far sooner than is typical following the first commercial launch for a company. And that's also going to be enabling us to be in those centers where we expect CK-274 and others of our cardiovascular products to also be commercialized. So this is hand in hand R&D strategy together with business development and corporate development strategy.

Great. Well, thank you Robert and team. I hope you all continue to stay healthy and safe and are not plagued by any more technical difficulties.

Thank you.

And it does seem like we now we do have our speakers back online. So I'll move to our next question. The next question is from the line of Ted Tenthoff from Piper Sandler.

Thanks so much for taking my question. Lots of good updates there and we're like an excited for GALACTIC data particularly, I appreciate with the context you provided there. My question, has to do with reldesemtiv and the new Astellas partnership. And I want to kind of get a sense from you guys what you mean to see either through additional data cuts or from conversations in terms of what you're hoping to achieve with the FDA to really decide whether that would be a worthwhile investment? And with some return of 601 to you guys, is that a more potent compound that might even may be a better candidate to take for it? Thanks so much.

Very good questions. I'll start and turn it over to Fady again. So with regard to your first question, I think with regard to other data cuts, we have already, both with pre-specified and some admittedly post-talk analysis seen data that we considered to be compelling for the potential of reldesemtiv in the treatment of ALS. But with that said, we still need to ensure that we can conduct a proper clinical trial and one that would be both statistically and clinically relevant upon completion, but also generating results that could be meaningfully valuable to payers and reimbursement authorities. And we're in the midst of those discussions. We're doing this in an admittedly painstakingly thoughtful way. It's taking time, but we think that's time well spent in order to ensure that we have dotted all the eyes and crossed all the relevant teas. We're encouraged by the feedback we've already received from FDA and EMA and as we're engaging reimbursement authorities and payers, but we're not done yet. And we are purposefully ensuring that those timelines line up with our ability to start a clinical trial in the fourth quarter, if the GALACTIC-HF results are enabling of us and our cost of capital is such that we think this is the right thing to do by our science and by our shareholders. So all that said is meant to indicate that we are very optimistic and we are very encouraged already by the interactions that we've been having. Fady, anything you want to elaborate on that?

No, I think you said it well. I mean I think we are preparing by seeking all the regulatory and HKE [ph] feedback, you mentioned and also considering how we may finalize the protocol. So, we do want to be ready to consider starting that trial after we understand how GALACTIC reads out.

And Chad, the other part of your question related to CK-601, so like all of our programs, CK-601 is a backup and follow on to the predecessor compounds. And we think that CK-601 has some properties that may render it suitable for advancement, potentially even in other indications. You could imagine for instance, reldesemtiv going forward in ALS and rare neuromuscular diseases. You could imagine CK-601 going forward either in those same indications or potentially even non-neuromuscular indications. For instance, as we contemplate expanding our skeletal muscle franchise to non-neuromuscular indications. And there are some indications that also could even overlap between our cardiac and skeletal muscle programs. So in keeping with our strategy to be a pioneer and leader in muscle biology, this is part of that strategy. And CK-601 represents another vector, if you will, for value creation.

Great. That makes a lot of sense. I hadn't thought about it that way. And just a real quick one for Ching , if I may. Ching it was a little bit higher, I think even in the press release you noted a stock based comp which obviously was the nice share price performance is probably part of that. Is there anything in there that's going into kind of pre-commercial opportunities? And I kind of look at sort of where you are for the first quarter and if we analyze that – annualize that, it's actually a little bit above the high-end of your OpEx guidance. I am just trying to get a sense for maybe what the Cytokinetics expenses might look like for the rest of the year. Thanks.

Thanks, Ted. Good question. So, the first quarter of burn rate of $30 million, you’re correct, if you were to annualize that it would be higher than the guidance we've given. But part of it is driven by the fact that we ended 2019 with slightly higher than normal accounts payable balance. So, the fact that the first quarter cash burn is higher than normal and it was anticipated and incorporated into our guidance.

Great, thank you so much. Stay well everybody.

Thank you.

And we do have one last question on the line. This is from the line of Jeff Hung from Morgan Stanley.

Hello, Jeff.

Hey, thanks for taking the questions. So the GALACTIC to the extent that you have visibility into it, can you talk about how the rate of events have been since the second interim analysis? And once the targeted number of events have occurred, can you remind us that timing that you think you'll need for aspects like data cleanup and analysis?

Sure. Good questions. Fady, do you want to take that?

Yes, I can take that. I think I can't really comment specifically on how event rates have changed. I mean, in generally the macro level, as people are not coming to the hospital with the same frequency that they have for many conditions and including cardiovascular conditions. Now that said, I think our trial is driven by cardiovascular death as the end of the trial and that event rate I think, has not been substantially affected over the last little bit. Still early to tell, some of these things lag. We're only a few months into this. But that said it’s on clinicaltrials.gov. Amgen recently updated the timing for last patient last visit to August 7. And while that's an estimation at this point, I think it gives you a sense of where we think that event will occur. Following the last event necessary to trigger the end of the trial, it’s a big trial, there's a lot of data cleanup and event adjudication that has to occur. You need to gather documents from 35 countries, potentially where the events may have occurred. There are several logistical aspects of that and planning that's being put in place now to help facilitate the rapid acquisition of those events and the education data. And I think, we would be on time to read that out in the fourth quarter, but I'm not going to be able to get more specific than that. I'm sorry to say, Jeff.

All right, no problem. Thanks. And then I guess any updates on the commercial preparations for omecamtiv ahead of the GALACTIC readout?

Yes. So, we are very, very busy together in collaboration with Amgen on those matters. And some of the increased spending that Ching and Robert were highlighting related to increase G&A spending and pertaining to commercial readiness. We and Amgen are mapping out and having launch readiness activity meetings associated with a potential commercial launch in the second-half of 2021. And that means we are in that very launch period. With that said, we have to be refining our positioning. We have to be locking down on a lot of our strategies, even as it relates to contracting and payers, even as it pertains to the potential co-promotion. And in light of that we are intending to negotiate with Amgen an agreement this year that affords us the rights and responsibilities in connection with that co-promotion and clarity for both companies as to what would be our role, what would be their role, and how would those be aligned and where those folks would be working together. All of that needs to occur this year, in order to ensure we're poised maximally for readiness for a commercialization program next year. Both companies have dialed up resources, hiring and otherwise, in order to be able to make that happen. And I'm pretty pleased that we're getting high visibility and high commitment at both companies.

Great, thanks.

Thank you.

And again, that was our last question.

Excellent. Well, with apologies for falling off the call, and not being able to hear some of those questions. I'm glad that our team members were able to address them. And for any folks on the call, who didn't get their questions answered, please follow-up with us. These are truly extraordinary times. We recognize that and hopefully you can see that Cytokinetics is focused forward and delivering on the key strategic objectives for 2020. And that we're financially and operationally moving forward in a solid position and way. And at the same time, we're recognizing we're moving to a new normal. And with that new normal, we want to be as agile and adapting as we can be in order to deliver on the promise of our science. With that, we look forward to keeping you updated on our progress through the remainder of the year. We thank all the participants on the teleconference today, for your continued support and interest in Cytokinetics. Operator, we can now conclude the call. Thank you.

Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may all now disconnect.