Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Curtiss-Wright Second Quarter 2021 Financial Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] I’d now like to introduce Senior Director, Investor Relations, Jim Ryan.

Thank you, Andrew, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Curtiss-Wright’s second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Joining me on the call today are President and Chief Executive Officer, Lynn Bamford; and Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Chris Farkas. Our call today is being webcast and the press release as well as a copy of today’s financial presentation is available for download through the Investor Relations section of our company website at www.curtisswright.com. A replay of this webcast also can be found on the website. Please note today’s discussion will include certain projections and statements that are forward-looking as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and are not guarantees of future performance. We detail those risks and uncertainties associated with our forward-looking statements in our public filings with the SEC. As a reminder, the company’s results include an adjusted non-GAAP view that excludes certain costs in order to provide greater transparency into Curtiss-Wright’s ongoing operating and financial performance. Also note that both our adjusted results and full year guidance exclude our build-to-print actuation product line that supported the 737 MAX program, as well as our German valves business, which is classified as held for sale in the fourth quarter. GAAP to non-GAAP reconciliations for current and prior year periods are available in the earnings released at the end of this presentation and on our website. Any references to organic growth exclude the effects of restructuring, foreign currency translation, acquisitions and divestitures, unless otherwise noted. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Lynn to get things started. Lynn?

Thank you, Jim, and good morning, everyone. I’ll begin with the key highlights of our second quarter performance and an overview of our full year 2021 outlook. Then I’ll turn the call over to Chris to provide a more detailed review of our financial results and updates to our full year guidance. Finally, I’ll wrap up our prepared remarks before we move to Q&A. Starting with the second quarter highlights, overall we experienced a strong 14% increase in sales. Our aerospace and defense markets improved 11%, while sales to our commercial markets increased 21% year-over-year. Diving deeper within our markets, we experienced double-digit sequential improvements in sales within our commercial aerospace, power and process and general industrial markets. These markets were among the hardest hit by the pandemic last year and we are encouraged by their improving conditions. Looking at our profitability, adjusted operating income improved 24%, while adjusted operating margins increased 120 basis points to 15.6%. This performance reflects strong margin improvement in both the Aerospace and Industrial, and the Naval and Power segments based upon higher sales as well as the benefits of our operational excellence initiatives. It’s important to note that this strong performance was achieved while we continued to invest strategically with a $5 million incremental investment in research and development as compared to the prior year. Based on our solid operational performance, adjusted diluted EPS was $1.56 in the second quarter, which was slightly above our expectations. This reflects a strong 22% year-over-year growth rate, despite higher interest expense and a slightly higher tax rates, which were generally offset by the benefits of our consistent share repurchase activity. Turning to our second quarter orders, we achieved 11% growth and generated a strong 1.1 times book-to-bill overall as orders exceeded one-time sales within each of our three segments. Of note, our results reflect strong commercial market orders, which surged 50% year-over-year and included a record quarter of order activity for our industrial vehicle products covering both on- and off-highway markets. Within our aerospace and defense markets, book-to-bill was 1.15. This included $130 million in Naval order for aircraft carrier and submarine platforms, which we announced in an earlier press release and we are also expecting a strong second half in orders. Next to our full year 2021 adjusted guidance, where we raised our sales, operating income, margin and diluted earnings per share. Our updated guidance reflects an improved outlook in our industrial markets, some additional planned R&D investment to support our top line growth and an increase to the full year tax rate. Chris will take you through the detail in the upcoming slides, but in summary, we are well positioned to deliver strong results in 2021. Now I’d like to turn the call over to Chris to provide a more thorough review of our second quarter performance and our improved outlook for 2021. Chris?

Thank you, Lynn, and good morning, everyone. I’ll begin with the key drivers of our second quarter results, where we, again, delivered another strong financial performance. Starting in the Aerospace and Industrial segment, sales improved sharply year-over-year and this was led by a strong increase in demand of approximately 40% for industrial vehicle products to both on- and off-highway markets. The segment sales growth also benefited from solid demand for surface treatment services to our industrial markets, which is driven by steady improvements in global economic activity. Within the segment’s commercial aerospace market, we experienced improved demand for our sensors products on narrow-body platforms. However, as we expected, those gains were mainly offset by continued slowdowns on several wide-body platforms. Looking ahead to the second half of 2021, we expect an improved performance within this market led by increased production of narrow-body aircraft, including a 737 and A320. Longer-term, we see narrow-body aircraft returning to prior production levels by the 2023 timeframe, while wide-body aircraft may not fully recover until 2024 or even 2025. Turning to the segment’s profitability, adjusted operating income increased 138%, while adjusted operating margin increased 800 basis points to 15.7%, reflecting favorable absorption on higher sales and a dramatic recovery from last year’s second quarter. Also our results reflect the benefits of our ongoing operational excellence initiatives and year-over-year restructuring savings. And although we continue to experience some minor influences from supply chain constraints in both container shipments and electronic components, this impact is immaterial to our overall results. In the Defense Electronics segment, revenues increased 17% overall in the second quarter. This was led by another strong performance from our PacStar acquisition, which is executing quite well and its integration remains on track. Aside from PacStar, second quarter sales were lower on an organic basis…

Thank you, Chris. I’d like to spend the next few minutes discussing some thoughts and observations since our recent May Investor Day. I’ll start with the President’s FY 2022 defense budget requests, which was issued shortly after our Investor Day event. The release reflected approximately 2% growth over the FY 2021 enacted budget and was reasonably consistent with our expectations and plans. The budget revealed, continued strong support for the most critical U.S. Naval platforms, including the CVN-80 and CVN-81 aircraft carriers and the Columbia class and Virginia class submarines. We believe the bipartisan support for the Navy’s future provides us a strong base from which we can grow our nuclear and surface ship revenues and has room for potential upside, should they add a third Virginia submarine or another DDG destroyer. We also expect ongoing support for the funding of the DoD’s top strategic priorities, including cyber, encryption, unmanned and autonomous vehicles all of which were highlighted in the budget release. This bodes well for our Defense Electronics product offering, which support all of these areas. Another bright spot was army modernization, despite cuts to the overall army budget funding to upgrade battlefield networks is up 25% in the services FY 2022 budget requests to a total of $2.7 billion, which represents the single greatest increase among the Army’s modernization priorities. Further, it provides great confidence behind our decision to acquire PacStar as they are in a prime position to capitalize on the ongoing modernization of ground forces. Since then, we have also seen increasing signs of optimism as the budget makes its way through the congressional markup. The recent vote by the Senate Armed Services Committee to authorize an additional $25 billion to the Pentagon’s budget for FY 2022, represent a 3% upside to the President’s initial requests…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Nathan Jones with Stifel.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, Nathan.

Good morning, Nathan.

I’d like to start off with the question on the cost commentary. You had customers potentially stocking up in 1Q that led to maybe a bit of a decline in the second quarter. You’ll typically see a seasonal ramp into the second half, still anticipating seeing that seasonal ramp. And how do you think about inventory in the channel and inventory at customers? Do you think that they’re still ahead of where they would normally be in line behind? Just any color you can give us on that.

Yes, sure. I’ll take that one. I mean, in Q1, we definitely saw some defense customers, accelerate orders, looking to try to get ahead of the electronics component shortage. So as you look at this organic headwind that we had year-over-year in Q2 about $8 million, that was really just work that had been accelerated into Q1. I mean, we continue to experience some minor delays on electronic components. So it’s a fairly dynamic situation out there in the market given what most companies went through last year and the steep ramp that most companies are fortunate enough to face this year. But it’s really impacting mainly the timing of revenues, aero defense revenues, higher margin C5ISR products within our Defense Electronics segment. Now as you look at the second half of the year, we expect that there will be some pressure based upon the timing of receipt of those components. And most of that pressure will be put on Q3. But as you’ve seen historically coming out of the Defense Electronics business, we typically have a very big Q4 ramp and we’re expecting that again this year. So we’re currently working our way through the issues and feel like we’re doing a good job in overcoming those pressures.

And then I guess I’ll head back to Lynn’s favorite area, R&D. You increased the R&D expense in second quarter, increased your target for the full year. Can you talk about the opportunities that you have there? Whether you think that there are opportunities to continue to increase that R&D investment as we go forward? Whether we should think about it more as plateauing at this level? Any guidance you can give us on that?

So thank you for that. And it is, as you stated, an area I do like to talk about. So with that, we’ve put up some additional R&D in our Defense Electronics group as we just continue to see really outstanding opportunities to expand our product line both in broadening our product line around the MOSA initiative, as it’s just continues to gain traction across a broad range of customers in the defense industry, but then also some specific technologies around encryption and the denied GPS, cyber, and really some additional investments in – with our PacStar team around the battlefield modernization. So the opportunities just continue to grow. We are really positioned at a great time right now and really feel that the time is right to invest. The other area where we are also increasing investment is in A&I and that’s really around the electrification and electronification, Internet of Things, around electric vehicles, hybrid vehicles and are pushing that area that we’ve really positioned ourselves to be a leader, a technology leader in this space and are a go-to for a lot of the major vehicle manufacturers. And we’re really making sure that we’re very systematically knowing who’s building vehicles in this space and are working with them to have often tailored variants of specific products to fit specifically into their vehicles, and that takes some investment on our parts and we feel it’s the right thing to do. And, again, we were frequently asked about do we think that R&D will go up again in 2022 or not? And we’re not giving specific guidance in that. And I really do think it’s important for people to understand that we really are, case by case, looking at how we allocate our capital and whether R&D is the best investment in it, other investments, or it’s time to return that in margin. And we’ll make balanced decisions in that area based on the opportunities that are before us. But we’re not afraid to spend some R&D to secure long-term growth, where we see opportunities that we can see are going to pay dividends for years to come. And we make R&D investments that pay dividends, honestly, within the same calendar year, the next calendar year, and sometimes it’s three to four years out. And so again, you have to not just balance the returns, but also make sure you’re fueling your immediate-term, near-term and longer-term growth. And so those are the trade-offs, we’re maturing our processes around how we look broadly at those investments across the organization and make the best strategic investments.

Great. Thanks for taking my questions.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Myles Walton with UBS.

Thanks. Good morning.

Good morning.

Maybe, Lynn, you talked about the M&A pipeline being very full at the moment and maybe optimism about reaching the upper end of the sales target. Can you sort of reengage on that and talk about what kinds of property sizes, scales, pricing, and sort of any other characteristics you’d like to flesh out? As well as do you think you’d close one before the end of the year that’s material?

Sure. So I think honestly, anticipations on some tax law changes coming in 2022 has upped people’s motivations, that things they were considering selling both PEs and private companies to try and get deals done this year. So for a lot of the active properties in the pipeline, the push is to do a deal this year. Now, again, whether we actually do a deal will depend on as we move through diligence on some properties that we’re active with right now. But again, we’re not going to do a deal, as we always say, you’d be disappointed if I didn’t reiterate it that we won’t do a deal for a deal sake, it’s going to have to be the right strategic and financial fit, but there’s targets out there that are in that range. I would say, the largest number of the properties we’re seeing are across our defense markets right now, that is the majority of the pipeline. It’s not exclusively that, but that is – it does seem to be the most active area right now, which is an area that’s a high priority for us. So that works well. I mean, we’re not saying that we would only buy properties in defense and industries, but it is an area, especially where we see them being complimentary to our current product offering. And it’s something additional we can bring to our current customer base, whether that’s a Naval platform or one of the people building electronics sub systems. And so that’s very much. The prices are kind of in line with what we’ve seen historically. I would say, it hasn’t – I mean, I know there’s some talk and there’s some examples of prices being more, the multiples being more extreme. I think we’re finding quality products where the multiples are reasonable and in line with what would make them a good strategic fit within Curtiss-Wright. And so that’s something that – we do have a lot of management attention on a lot of processes, we have quite a few active properties right now that we’re working through to see which ones we think would be the best strategic fit for Curtiss-Wright. So I think there’s a reasonable chance. We would add something to our portfolio in the calendar year. And we are seeing properties in the range of PacStar types of revenues that are coming available. So it’s really a great healthy pipeline right now.

Okay. That’s great color. Thank you. And then maybe on just the press release you put out the other day on the X-energy, selection for reactivity and control and shutdown system. I’m not as familiar with what you might be doing there on the nuclear side that could maybe reignite some of the fade and the revenue on the new build OEMs. Maybe is there something there to point to that would cause me to be more optimistic about the future of OEM commercial nuclear?

So thank you, thank you for reading our press release first and asking about it. So I’ll open with that. But there is – I don’t – one of the areas that also got a lot of support in the Department of Energy budget that was put forward as part of the FY 2022 overall budget was an increase of spending of a significant amount on – from the Department of Energy to support the funding of new small modular reactors and new advanced reactors. And this program, X-energy is one of the two companies that has been funded by the DOE for development of future reactors. And so we are very active and engaging with everybody that’s out there, both from the private sector and receiving public funding to participate in their reactor development, because there’s a lot of companies. I mean, there’s probably 20 companies out there right now, roughly that are working on new reactor developments. And surely not all of those will go to commercial production. So it’s definitely one of those situations where you got to cover the field. So you’re partnered with the ones that are going to go. And I think things continue to progress nicely for new scale where we have the most – which really got started several years ago. And we have the most significant content on that, that we’ve talked about. It’s earlier days for some of these others where we’re still winning content. I think in our Investor Day we talked about the ranges of revenue we might get on various types of reactors from tens to many tens about millions of dollars per reactor. And so I just think the overall sentiment is the press for carbon pre-energy becomes ever more. That I think more and more it’s being recognized and we’re hearing it from the government and the Biden administration, recognizing that nuclear needs to be a part of that. And I think that’s being recognized worldwide. There’s a lot of activity, licenses being processed over in Eastern Europe as those countries say, we’re not going to get there without nuclear. And so this isn’t going to light on fire in 2021 or 2022, but it’s going to be a strong area for us this decade for sure.

Okay, great. And one clear clarification or detailed modeling question. Chris, on the other income, it was virtually breakeven in the quarter, I guess, $400,000, and I think you’re still guiding $16 million to $17 million for the year. Was there anything specific that drove the lighter other income in the quarter?

No, I mean, I think as you look at really what’s happening kind of year-over-year, it’s really just – we are seeing other income drop and it’s mainly associated with the pension. We did as you know process and payments to former executives that had recently retired during the quarter. And there’s some pension true-up that comes along with that, but that’s really the full extent of it.

Okay. Thanks.

Sure.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Michael Ciarmoli with Truist Securities.

Hey guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions.

Good morning.

Chris, can talk about the order flow and maybe parse it out by segment if you have the book-to-bill, I think you said Naval was very strong, but maybe curious about the broader Defense portfolio and maybe even outside of industrial, which you called out, any more color you can give on the bookings environment?

Yeah, sure. I mean, overall for the second quarter, we were one times – 1.1 times book-to-bill and we were stronger than one times across each of our segments, so all three segments. We were also above one time in A&D and commercial, not we dive a little bit deeper in A&D we were a little bit stronger on the defense side and just shy of one on the commercial Aero side, but overall a very strong quarter. We saw our orders up 67 million or 11% year-over-year and our backlog is up, now A&D flat, commercial up 12%. But I think you should take a look at the orders and what happened this year versus last year. It’s important to note that we had a very strong Q2 last year, $230 million enabled orders that we received that’s a little bit lumpy. This year in Q2, we issued a press release and we got about $130 million in orders, and we are expecting another big Q3. So it’ll level out year-over-year. It’ll be another strong year for us in orders. As you take a look at commercial and what happened there, I mean we were up $77 million or 50% year-over-year, and the vast majority of that related to on- and off-highway vehicle products, and that GI recovery, some nuclear aftermarket, but overall very strong quarter for orders, great book-to-bill and we’re pleased with our positioning on the full year.

How was the defense ex-Navy, you’re kind of specific defense?

Yeah, so defense ex-Navy, I mean we did benefit from PacStar, PacStar acquisition, orders in that field ranged slightly above what their sales were for the quarter. We did see a little bit of pressure in C5ISR and aero defense. But that was really mainly due to that acceleration that we saw in the first quarter. So I think our outlook, as we look across the back half of the year is that, we’re expecting a sequential improvement in both Naval orders and Defense Aero orders for electronic – for Defense Electronics. So I think we’ve got a good trajectory ahead of us and we’re expecting a good second half.

Okay. And are you seeing any impact? I mean, we’ve seen some suppliers call out the F-35. I know you’ve got some content there, is it timing risk there? You obviously called out the pull forward, but is that program kind of sliding to the right or what do you see in with F-35?

No, I mean, we’re not really seeing anything in terms of program delays, anything out there. I mean, as you know, we have a fairly agnostic approach to the development of our products, and we’ve got a very, very wide range of platforms that we support across the defense industry and our defense electronics business. We’re not seeing anything there that’s unusual. We did mention, you hear that, we are working through some issues relative to the timing of availability in small electronic components, but we feel like those were mostly timing related issues and the team’s doing a great job and working its way through that.

Got it, got it. Maybe just one last one, I mean you were talking commercial aerospace with narrow bodies. Can you just maybe level set us, you got the MAX, so on narrow bodies, I mean, you still have a good portion of any legacy content on the MAX right now. Is it – are we just more focused on the neo at this point and outside of I mean, obviously the wide bodies, presumably just 87 has the real outside exposure and A350.

Yeah. I mean, just to throw a few numbers out there, I mean on the Boeing 737 MAX, we still have 75K per ship set. So even though we walked away from that build print business last year, we are still benefiting from and what we expect to see is a ramp here in the back half of the year. We’re producing in line with Boeing and therefore their plans are to ramp to 31 per month by early 2022. So we’ll definitely see some pick up here in the back half of the year on narrow-body kind. And on the 787 program, we do 500K per ship set. Yes, there’s been some temporary delays and what I would tell you in that program, but it’s not material to our overall business. We expect that they’re going to pick that back up here in the second half of the year. And on the full-year, we’re expecting commercial aero to be relatively flat. Some headwinds here at the beginning of the year relative to wide-body, but we expect a ramp up in narrow-body that’s going to more than offset that as we get deeper into the year.

Got it. Thanks for the color guys.

Yep. Thanks, Mike.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Peter Arment with Baird.

Yeah, good morning, Lynn and Christian. Chris, maybe just clarification on – so your defense electronics growth was down 6% in the quarter, and I guess it’s down 1% year-to-date, you kind of called out the cadence a little bit. But just for a modeling purposes, so are we expecting kind of a softer Q3 a little bit or just relative to what you just experienced and then a much stronger fourth quarter, just a little color there. It’d be helpful.

Yeah. We’ve got a sequential ramp here in aerospace defense revenues Q2 to Q3 this year. So I should say, I’m sorry, defense electronics revenues in Q2 to Q3. Yeah, but we will certainly have our strongest quarter in Q4 and it is typically our strongest quarter. So yeah, we will see continued improvement here in the back half of the year, Q4 will be our strongest. I think, in our script here, we talked a little bit about the soft guide on Q3. And as you look at flat EPS year-over-year, Q3-to-Q3, I think most of that is associated with what we’re facing here in this temporary timing issue in defense electronics.

Okay. And then just on incremental, I mean obviously very strong in aero industrial, as you would expect, just kind of snapping back and a little softer in defense electronics. How should we think about that as that just progresses for the year, similar?

Yeah, I mean we do 25% to 30% incremental margins. I think that’s a fair way to look at it as you go throughout the year. I mean, certainly we’re starting to get some good traction here on our operational excellence initiatives, as we are seeing some good things out of the gate. We’ve got a slight benefit here in Q2 and few places associated with that, but that’ll continue on deeper into the full year. I think we’re expecting to see some of the minor supply chain issues that we faced earlier this year. I mean, we talked a little bit about some very – I’ll call it a material impacts to freight and expediting costs to kind of get around some of that and we’ll see some pickup in the back half of the year as we get ahead of that. And just great overall absorption. I mean, particularly when you look at that aerospace and industrial group from last year in Q2, if you recall, we actually had to shut down a couple of Mexico facilities for a few months there. So when you look at that 800 basis points of expansion year-over-year, I mean, it’s really just a strong ramp in revenues and what we’re seeing and we expect to have good things out of that segment for the rest of the year. We just increased our guidance to reflect the strong industrial vehicle order outlook and there’ll be a lot of good sales volume and absorption coming through there.

Appreciate that. And then just one, just as a follow back up on defense electronics in general, sometimes and they, as budgets kind of flatten out or get a little softer, we hear about maybe potentially OEMs, maybe not doing as much outsourcing or not going down that path. Maybe you could just kind of highlight that how you think your business is positioned versus either your peers or just how that will operate in that environment. Thanks.

Well, I think, something we talked a lot about during the Investor Day was this tri-service memo back in 2019 with the push for the MOSA and the SOSA, outsourcing across all three branches of the defense industry. And I think we’ve been really working to put some press releases out to highlight where we have invested. We started back in 2019 on the product offering to support that. And we think that our product positioning with that and the push toward outsourcing towards MOSA, puts us in a great position that we will continue to grow better than the defense budget during the foreseeable future, that we’ve made the right investments and we spend our R&D very carefully, very strategically with a very keen eye to return on investment and looking at the programs that will be available to us with investing in the right products. And so we believe that push towards outsourcing gives us opportunities for growth. And then I look at things like, PacStar being positioned where they’re positioned and it’s the beginning of this really 10-year journey to modernize the battlefield. The investments we’ve made in encryption, it’s early days with the denied GPS product offering, but that is an area that continues to be a focus for the across the army and some of the other services to quite frankly, that there is similar technologies in the aerospace area that we’re being able to read that technology across to delivering that same capability. So there’s a lot of reasons that we do feel very strongly about our ability to continue to outpace the defense budgets so much.

Thanks so much. Appreciate all the details, Lynn.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. I’m showing no further questions. So with that, I’ll turn the call back over to President and Chief Executive Officer Lynn Bamford for any closing remarks.

I will simply say thank you for joining us today. And we look forward to speaking with you again during our third quarter earnings conference call and have a great day.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.