Yes, sure, Phil. Zach, thank you for the question. The situation I think is generally unchanged from the last call in terms of ICU bed availability. So in general, the big hospitals have a reduction of ICU bed capacity by about 25% to 35%, which is mainly based on the lack of personnel. So because of the pandemic, lots of doctors and health care professionals have quit their duties. And so it's very difficult for the hospitals to keep the capacity they had pre-pandemic. This, of course, has impact on different other things. This has impact on patients they can accept from other hospitals. And this has also impact on the surgery procedures the hospitals can perform. And all these -- obviously, all these processes are feeding our patient funnel if we want to say so. So that's why the number of patients is still limited at the moment, and we hope that especially the surgical programs are revamping and revamping and going up in the next few weeks and months. So in general, the situation from the customer access has improved. We have still not the 100% number of visits as we had it in average before the pandemic. This is mainly because of certain regulations that you can enter hospitals only with fixed appointments. Obviously, we have those. But in the past, we also used cold calls very much to go to different customers and potential customers. This option is limited at the moment. And this obviously also is impacting the acquisition of new customers. Yes. This is, I think, the general situation. But again, what has been said several times in this call, it's interesting that the visits we are having and the discussions are really overly positive. So the users are very much open and happy to have these discussions again, get new information about the therapy, get new data and have these discussions and analysis how to treat patients better. So the response from the customers and users is, I would say, 95% positive. And also in the past, we have discussed applications which were unfavorable or neutral. And we could show in many discussions with the users that those studies are often selecting the wrong patients or having the not up-to-date treatment regimen. And all these are obviously can lead to less optimum outcome of these therapies. So we have initiated a number of programs, for example, one is called we have talked about this right patient, right timing, right dosing. And this is focusing and addressing that the patient selection is clear, and you have the right patients, which is sick enough, but not too sick that the therapy is initiated early, and we have seen this in the CTC data again and that the number of treatments per patient has to be adequate. And this leads more and more to a new therapy regimen in many indications and will lead also to more assumption. I'm pretty sure. Is this answering your question?