Yes, as you mentioned, the two components really are freight and shrink, more heavily weighted towards freight. And the issue there is that, as I mentioned, we've got more cartons going through the system. And if you think about some of the rebuilds that David called out, Big Men's, Home, Footwear, those are bulkier items, right? So in the weeds here, Jeremy, forgive me, but the units per carton are lower. So in order to get that 1% increase in inventory that we reported at the end of the quarter, you're moving a lot more cartons through the system. So higher volume equals higher freight expense as we expect that to mitigate in Q4 as the rebuild, the bulk of the rebuild is behind us. So for the shrink line, which is a smaller component, but still a component, is as I mentioned and I think you know this, we talked about this in the past. Our cadence is to take physical inventories in a section of our stores every month, as opposed to other retailers to do it maybe 1 time a year or 2 times a year. So we're testing our results every month, but it is subject to how those particular stores are performing from a shrink perspective. So in Q3, we had a group of stores, a class of stores, if you will, who had higher strength than the balance of the chain, which was driving the majority of that increase in shrink expense. So bummer, for sure. As I mentioned, we're really focused on controlling strength. We've got a cross functional team, loss prevention, field HR, field leadership that are really, really focused on controlling shrink, whether it's from a talent perspective, from a reporting perspective, from a local law enforcement perspective, we are all over it. So hopefully, I'm giving you the feel that we are all over both shrink and freight and don't expect the same level of headwinds going forward.