Matias Gaivironsky
Analyst
Thank you, Alejandro. Good morning, everybody. So if we turn to Page 8, we can see our investment in IRSA. After the dividend that we paid, our stake in IRSA today is 54.1% or 54.2%. IRSA had very good results during the quarter. We saw a strong financial and operational performance. In most of the segments, shopping malls have been growing and increased occupancy. The hotels today are performing very well. The most [indiscernible] today is Llao Llao in Patagonia, but the 2 hotels in Buenos Aires are performing very well. The offices, we saw a slight recovery in occupancy. And also IRSA was very active selling assets during the quarter. We sold 3 floors in the Della Polera building, an entire building, the Suipacha building, the stake in Quality that was the owner of a big plot of land in the San Martin area in the province of Buenos Aires. Also, IRSA dividends during the quarter, representing a dividend yield of 12% that Cresud collected, part of that. If we see the evolution of the rental EBITDA over the last years in dollar terms, you can notice the last 12 months that we are surpassing by 34%, a pre-pandemic level. reaching $176 million. That is almost our record in the past 3 years. So going through the results of Cresud. On Page 10, we can see what happened with the main 2 drivers on the macroeconomic side, what happened with inflation and devaluation. In real terms, the official exchange rate devaluated by 1% compared with an appreciation last year of 4%. Regarding the dollar MEP, the dollar MEP also increased by 64% this year, in real terms, 21%. That will have an impact in the valuation of investment properties of IRSA basically the offices and the land bank, we are using the dollar MEP to convert into pesos, and that generated a very important gain that we will see later. So on Page 11, on the operating results of Cresud during the quarter. Remember that the first quarter because of the seasonality is not the most relevant quarter of the year. So basically, we have the remaining corn campaign and the sowing process of the wheat and some sugarcane, but the rest of the grains are still early to see results. If we compare year-over-year, we can see a drop in the FyO results. This is related only to the seasonality. Last year, there was the special effects for farmers and the activity in that quarter was very relevant. This year is not happening. So the drop is mainly attributable to that. Then in the farming activity, we see a better result, but still a loss that -- we have losses in the grain segment that is more related to the impact of the inflation, nothing relevant to say at this stage. In sugarcane, we see a drop as well because it's more related to the Brazil activity where the prices are lower and there was an increase in costs. So the margin is lower, and this is the reason of the drop. The cattle activity in a slight loss, but it's just related to the inflation, prices increased lower than inflation. So our gross margin is positive, but when we apply the impact of inflation, turned to negative. So on a consolidated basis, leaving aside the impact of the fair value of the investment property that is basically IRSA, we see a gain or an increase by 10% on our results. The fair value of the investment properties itself -- we posted a very important gain, a ARS 100 million gain that is related to what I said, the revaluation or the impact of the increase in the dollar MEP. If we measure the properties in dollars, there is no major changes. It's stable. So it's just -- this is a noncash effect related to the devaluation. When we analyze the results on the net financial results. Here, we have the other important effect that is in the table in the first row, you have the net FX result, where you have a positive result last year, a negative result this year. This is related to other dollar-denominated debts. So the devaluation has a negative impact on last year, we have an appreciation that generated gains. If you see the net interest line, there is an important decrease. We are basically having half of the interest that we have last year. This is some related -- or most related to the decrease in the leverage on both IRSA and Cresud and partially some accounting effects that when you have pesos interest against the devaluation that was the interest payments were lower, we are posting a gain in that line. Well, with all those effects, we finished the first quarter of the fiscal year with a gain of ARS 78.9 billion attributable to our shareholders ARS 40.8 billion compared with ARS 8.2 billion last year. About our debt. We can see a decrease in our net debt from -- in fiscal year '21 from $421 million to $352 million at the end of the quarter. Basically, we are applying the proceeds of the dividends to cancel debt. So that is the reason of the drop. And regarding the debt amortization schedule, we have the distribution of the amortization over the next year. So there is no pressure on our capital structure. About our own dividend distribution, our shareholders' meeting on October 5 decided to distribute a dividend of ARS 22 billion in cash and 3% of the shares of IRSA. So combining the 2 is a dividend yield of 8.3%. Also, we decided to distribute the treasury shares. So we still did 1% of our own stock that was paid in Argentina on October 12. And unfortunately, regarding our GDS holders, there was a new rule of the CMB, the local SEC, that basically limit the availability of Bank of New York to distribute or to convert the pesos into dollars to distribute the dividends to the GDS holders. So we are working with them, trying to find a solution for this. What the company decides in the meantime was not to wire the money to Bank of New York. So we maintain the money, and we invested that money in a money market fund from Banco Santander. The idea was to try to mitigate the impact of inflation until we find a way to distribute the dividends in dollars. So the decision not to transfer the money to Bank of New York was with only this intention because if we wire the money Bank of New York will leave the funds without any kind of investments. And if there is an alternative in the future that we can solve this issue, if they have the money, will be impossible to implement. For that reason, we decided to preserve the funds from our shareholders. Finally, about our repurchase program, we decided to extend another 180 days, the time frame to execute the plan. We already acquired 78% of the shares. So there is still some room to keep buying back shares that we plan to do it in the coming months. So with this, we finished the formal presentation. Now we open the line to receive your questions.