Matias Gaivironsky
Analyst
Thank you, Carlos. Good afternoon, everybody. So regarding our investment in IRSA during the quarter, we have different results. Shopping malls as you know were deeply affected by the pandemic with most of our operation closed during the quarter since March, the malls were closed and we started to open during the quarter. In September, we had around 44% of our malls open. Now the situation is different. We opened 100% of the operation but it's not reflected yet in the results. Regarding our commercial strategy, we decided to preserve long term relation with our tenants and really support them during this pandemic. We waved most of the rent during the quarter that has a cost for the company, but we prefer to preserve the relation in the long-run and give the time for the recovery to our tenants. Regarding the offices, its different. The operations were not affected by the pandemic. We have all our buildings under operations, although, most of the companies are working from home, their buildings are under operation. The stock, we have a slight decrease in the stock, because we sold some of square meters during the quarter. The occupancy remain stable at almost 92% and the average rent with a slight decrease to $26 per square meter. We are finishing the construction of the Della Paolera 200 that we will open hopefully during the next month. And regarding the hotels. Up to now, the hotels were closed now, and intercontinental start with some operations, the shops start to open during this week. So we hope to see better results going forward. Regarding the Israel business segment, as we described during the last quarter, unfortunately, we lost control of IDBD. There was a decision from a judge in Israel that decide that the company is insolvent and started the liquidation process. That liquidation process ended yesterday. The part of the liquidation ended yesterday with a disposal of the DAC shares to another group, to a third-party. So the company lost control on the investment and started consolidation of the investment starting in September 30. So the results that we’re going to see are not longer consolidated with IDBD. The consolidation generated a loss that we will review in the -- when I explain the financial statement. So move to Page 9, and we can see here the end of September that we are recognizing a net income of ARS7.5 billion against ARS9.5 billion of the last year attributable to our controlling shareholders is ARS2.9 billion against a loss last year of ARS3.2 billion. And we analyze more deeply what are the drivers of the net income. The first one came in the line -- in the line 6, the change in fair value, that is mainly in the urban business that generated a profit of ARS23.6 billion against last year of ARS12.1 billion. This is related to valuation at fair value of our offices and land bank that the exchange rate in Argentina, the blue chip swap increased significantly during the last quarter, and we are reflecting on a comparable basis the value of our buildings and that has a uprising in dollars. So when we reflect in pesos generate this profit. The other important effect is in the line 13, the net financial results that you can see last year a loss of ARS18.2 billion against a loss of ARS2.5 billion this year that I will explain later in the following pages. The other is in the income tax that is related to the change in the fair value. So when we have an appreciation of our properties, we recognize the deferred tax on that is not the current tax. So this is not a cash effect, it’s a noncash effect. And finally, in Page -- in line 16, we see the net income from this continuing operation. This is related to Israel. The reconsolidation this quarter generated a loss, because in the previous quarter we recognized it in the [solo] balance sheet, the investment at [zero] but on a consolidated basis, we lost control during September. So we have to recognize the result during the first days or during almost all the days of the quarter and then give impact to the reconsolidation. There are several reserves associated to our investment, like the commercial reserve and the minority or the controlling reserve that we have to eliminate in this quarter and that generated this loss of ARS6.3 billion -- almost ARS6.4 billion, and last year we recognized it here a gain of ARS13.9 billion that was related to the investment in Gabian, where we consolidated that subsidiary generated the profit. So if we move to Page 10. We have the breakdown on the adjusted EBITDA by segment. We can see on the total agribusiness results very similar than the previous year. When we see the farmland sales, we see an increase. This is related to the receivables that we have on the disposals of some farms in BrasilAgro. We sold farms with payments in installments associated to the price of the soybean. And since we see here an increasing value on the soybean, we have more receivables. And this is the main effect on the difference to last year. In the Grain segment, in line three, we see a drop from ARS666 million to a loss of almost ARS200 million. Remember that this is the first quarter of the year it’s not the most relevant quarter. We have the remaining stock of the last campaign that we haven't sold. And the main important effect here is that during the quarter we decided to hedge part of the production. And since the price of the soybean increase or the corn increase, we are recognizing here a loss that will be compensated with the evolution of the campaign, with the evolution we will recognize also the production and we'll be compensated this loss in the future. Sugarcane remain stable compared with the previous year. The Cattle, we have better results that is related to the price of the cattle here in Argentina, in terms of -- in real terms, we have an appreciation of the cattle that was recognized during the quarter. And finally, in the other segment FyO and the beef cattle facility, we have a drop in -- this is basically related to the operation of FyO that this quarter we are recognizing more costs related to inflation and salaries. And in the last year, we have some extraordinary effects because of the valuation during the last year. Regarding the urban segment, shopping malls were very affected by the pandemic. We generated a loss during the quarter with almost all the operation closed. So we expect to recover during the fiscal year to positive results again. In the offices, we have a drop of 32.9%. We have here a lower stock, because of the [indiscernible] of offices and slightly higher vacancy. And also last year, we have the effect of the devaluation that our agreements are in dollars and we have a real devaluation during the last year that generated a profit during the quarter of the last year. The hotels is the same trend than the shopping malls with operation closed, so that is the explanation. And finally in line 12, we have the sales and development. This is the part of the offices we sold. So we -- the gain between all the appreciation of the offices that we sold during the quarter were reflected in this line. If we move to Page 11, we can see the breakdown of our net financial results. As I mentioned, if you see on the bottom of the page, we have last year a devaluation 35.6% during the last year in real terms that was 12% and this year it's almost flat, and this has an impact on line three the net exchange differences that you can see in the part of Cresud and in the part of IRSA, that affect the dollar denominated debt. So that is the main effect on the financial side. The other one is in the results from fair value of the financial assets that you can see ARS640 million against ARS333 million lost last year. This is related to our liquidity and investment -- in the investment of our liquidity. Page 12, we mentioned during the quarter that the new regulation of the Central Bank affected one of our payments. Remember that the Central Bank basically ask the companies with amortizations during this semester to refinance debt. In fact, they say that they will only sale 40% of the dollars and the remaining 60% the companies has to refinance. They won’t sale more than 40% of the dollars. So we have to go to our existing [indiscernible] holders and ask for an exchange proposal. We gave two options; the option A gave alternative to our holders to collect cash and the remaining in new note; and option B for the ones that they don't want to collect dollars now, they can defer the payments and up to the next two years. The exchange were very successful. We have an acceptance of 88.41% the people that choose option A collected 96% in dollars. So instead of the 40% that the Central Bank allow us, they collected 96% and the remaining, the $34.3 million were refinanced up to November 2022. If we go to Page 15, we can see the debt amortization schedule. So we have atomized payments to do during the next three years. So no new measure after the payment. You remember that during the year, we issued $2 lean or $3 lean notes. So the idea of the company was to pay all the debt and this rule of the Central Bank force us to refinance. The company has strong cash position of almost $72 million more of cash available. So with this, we finish the formal presentation. Now we open the line for a Q&A session.