Matias Gaivironsky
Analyst
Thank you, Carlos. Good morning, everybody. So going to Page 9, here, we include the results from our stake in IRSA. Remember that we control 64% of IRSA shares. So we can see good results in the net income line, but it’s much bigger than the year ago. With ARS 11.1 billion attributable to IRSA shareholders, it’s ARS 9.4 billion against ARS 0.15 billion of last year. The adjusted EBITDA grew by 31%, and I will explain later the main event of IRSA on operational side. The operational levels remain at good levels, 98.7% occupancy in malls, 93.4% in offices, 64.5% in the hotels. The Israeli business segment, on the operational side, we have mixed results. Good results on the Real Estate, really decreasing the telecommunication company, and very good results from our stake in CLAL, that remember we value at market value, so we see that increase in the quarter of 34% generated very good results for it. So moving to Page 11. Here, we have our financial statements divided by the three segments, the Agribusiness, the Urban Argentina and the Israeli Business segment. You can see that we finished the quarter with a gain of ARS 7.5 billion against a loss in the last year of ARS 323 million. The part attributable to CRESUD shareholders is ARS 2.0 billion against ARS 221 million of last year. And we can see here different lines. I will try to explain the main effects. So we can see in the Agribusiness that the operational income is much higher than last year ARS 839 million in Line 9, you can see the operating income ARS 839 million against ARS 203 million. On the Urban segment, much higher results, mainly explained by the change in the fair value of the investment properties. In Line 4, you can see that the last year was ARS 2.5 billion and this year, it’s ARS 15.8 billion. When we analyze here the SG&A expense, this is 67%, in Line 6, 67% higher than the last year. But when we combine the Line 2, the cost and the Line 6, the SG&A, we see an increase of 34% that is in line with the inflation. We have some effects of – in this year that is one shot or effects that we haven’t last year like donations and allowance for bad debtors. But then we see that the revenues in the malls increased lower than inflation and the costs in line with the inflation. So we will see in the coming pages a little more details on that. And the Urban segment – sorry, on the Israeli Business segment, with the operational income that is lower, 35% against last year, that I will show the detail in the coming slide. In the Line 11, we see the net financial result that is very important effect on the quarter, that is a loss of ARS 10.4 billion against ARS 4.5 billion of the last year. Here, the main reason is the valuation in Argentina that I will explain in the following page – in the following slides. So we will move to Page 12. We answer in more detail in the operational side in the Agribusiness segment. We can see the adjusted EBITDA reaching ARS 1.7 billion against ARS 221 million. So much better results, mainly explained by two reasons. One, the disposal of Jatoba in Brazil that generated ARS 748 million. In last year, in the first quarter, we haven’t sold anything, so there we have only costs. So we see the first reason that disposal of farm, and the second reason is the farming is basically holding result. In this quarter, we haven’t harvest yet most of the – we harvest most of the place, that we’ll claim in the following quarters. But we have the holding results from the crops that remain in the stock at the beginning of the fiscal year. Remember that here, we have the devaluation in Argentina that generated that in pesos term will include significantly the result of the value of the – of our stock, that is reflected in the grain line, that is ARS 463 million against ARS 50 million of the last year. And also in Sugarcane, there is ARS 268 million against ARS 159 million. Also in the Sugarcane, we have better results on the production side in Brazil, so also it’s combining in that line. And in the Cattle and Milk that we discontinued in the last year, so for the year, it’s only the results from our holding of cattle stock, but also the improvement in prices generated better results. Finally, the Others line that include our stake in FYO, the brokerage firm and the Agro Industrial, the new packaging facilities generated much better results than the last year, ARS 177 million against ARS 12 million. In the two segments of new packing facilities with the exchange rate generated positive results in the quarter. If we move to Page 13, we move to the Urban segment. So in the Argentina Business segment, we can see that the adjusted EBITDA for shopping malls increased by 11% in pesos. Here we have the effect of revenues growing at the lower base than the inflation and cost at the same pace as inflation, so that generated the decrease in the margin of the mall and the increase by 11%. The office segment that is more dollarized or dollarized – all our agreements are in dollar, so we have the effect of dollar valuation, the positive effect of valuation ARS 158 million against ARS 83 million of the last year. The hotel also received a positive result from the valuation, that our rates are in dollars and our costs are in pesos. So we generated much better results than the last year. And sales and development, that during the quarter, we haven’t sold anything, and the last year, we sold a property that generated ARS 241 million. So those are the main effects on the operational side in Argentina. And in Israel, we have the Real Estate growing to 70%. Remember that the valuation between the shekel and the pesos was 50%. So 50% is explained by the valuation and the rest is the operational improvement. I look at telecommunication, a weak quarter, that generated a decrease in pesos terms of 3%. If we move to Page 14, we have here the main effects on the net financial results. Remember that we – during the quarter, we lost ARS 10.4 billion against ARS 4.5 billion of the previous year. When we separate in the different segments, we can see that in Argentina, the main effects – in Cresud plus BrasilAgro, the main effect is reflected in Line two, net exchange difference and also at the IRSA level. The reason is because all our debt or most of our debt is dollar denominated. And you can see in the bottom left that during the quarter, we had a valuation of 43% from 28.85 to 41.25, and the last year is only 4%. Then at the IDB level, an Israeli business segment, we have two effects. One is reflected in Line 5, profit from fair value of financial assets that generated a profitable result of ARS 4.6 million against ARS 38 million last year. You can see in the bottom right the evolution of the Clal shares that during the quarter increased by 34% and the last year remained flat, increasing only 1%. If we move to Page 15, we can see here the debt amortization scale. Our net debt increased comparable with the last quarter and the end of our fiscal year basically because of our debt – sorry, our share buyback. That during the last two quarters, we bought ARS 900 million of shares. So that generated an increase in our net debt. In the – below it, we can see the debt amortization schedule that on the left was the debt up to the 30 of September that we closed this quarter. And after that, last week, we issue a bond. We were the first Argentinian company to cap the market again. So the market was closed in April this year and Cresud opened the market, issuing a bond of $73.6 million with a fixed interest rate of 9% and amortization in two years. So after this refinancing, we are canceling all the bonds that mature during the next week and the following quarter. And we will maintain certain debt that is efficient because of the costs, is at $116 million, is basically refinancing exports that is the most efficient in terms of cost right now in Argentina. So with this, we finish the presentation. Now we open the line to receive your question.