Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Christie, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to Coty’s Fiscal First Quarter 2019 Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speakers’ remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded today, November 7th, 2018. On today’s call are Camillo Pane, Chief Executive Officer; and Ayesha Zafar, Interim Chief Financial Officer. I would like to remind you that many of the comments today may contain forward-looking statements. Please refer to Coty’s press release and the reports filed with the SEC, where the company lists factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements. All commentary on organic net revenue reflect a comparison of the business at constant currency, in the current and prior year period, excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures. In addition, except where noted, the discussion of our financial results and our expectations reflect certain adjustments, as specified in the non-GAAP financial measures section of our earnings release. You can find the bridge from GAAP to non-GAAP results in the reconciliation tables in the earnings release. I will now turn the call over to Mr. Pane.

Thank you, Christie, and welcome everybody to Coty fiscal 2019 first quarter conference call. We are very disappointed with the supply chain disruptions we have experienced over the last quarter and the resulting poor Q1 financial performance. While we had anticipated some level of disruption in the first quarter from warehousing and planning consolidation, the increased scope of the disruptions resulted in much weaker results than previously expected. We have been working hard to remedy the supply chain issues and expect to temper the headwinds in the second quarter, and have them be substantially resolved in the third quarter, although we do not expect to fully recover the Q1 financial impact in the balance of fiscal 2019. As a result of these disruptions, we have decided to modify our distribution center consolidation plan for the remainder of the year to minimize business impact. With a healthy synergy delivery already in Q1, these modifications should have no impact to our commitment of $225 million of synergies in fiscal 2019 and $750 million of synergies by the end of fiscal 2020. By division, underlying consumer demand in Luxury and Professional Beauty remains strong, but the underlying performance of consumer beauty remains challenged. Our immediate focus in the business right now is three-pronged. First, to resolve the supply chain disruption. Second, to improve underlying performance in consumer beauty, and third, to improve cash flow generation. So let’s get into the results. First quarter revenues declined 7.7% on a like-for-like basis, as we encountered temporary supply chain headwinds. Alongside, the previously flagged supply chain issues affecting consumer beauty and professional beauty, our Luxury division was also impacted in Q1 by a disruption in European warehouse, by the U.S. Hurricane and by component shortages of certain external suppliers. All of this factors cumulatively impacted our…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And your first question is from Lauren Lieberman of Barclays.

Thanks, good morning Camillo and thank you for all that detail, both in the release and going through in your prepared remarks, it was really helpful. And I wanted to ask first just about the profit impact of the supply chain issues, because if I recall coming into the fiscal year, we had talked about there being almost a $100 million headwind from just the integration-related issues on supply chain, in this quarter, you called that it being around $60 million, so is part of this and any this ties to the discussion of it being casted – forecasted financial impacts, but was there some almost delay in things have slowed down, but the cost is taking longer to work through it, I just, there does seem to be a bit of a gap in how we’re thinking about the impact on operating profits. You said it wasn’t what we expected it to be, was the first question. The second was on the Luxury componentry issue. Is there any reason to tie this to some of your cost saving efforts? So whether it’s a choice of suppliers, things that you’ve done and how you’re working with those suppliers that ultimately had a knock on certain ability to access the necessary component trade. Thanks.

Thanks, Lauren. Looking at the – your first question, which is the supply chain, what we said in the previous quarters so at the end of 2018 in August is that we were expecting an overall full year impact from supply chain headwinds of $50 million on OI [ph]. What happened in reality is that we had $60 million just in Q1, and the reality is that at the time of the 2018 earnings if we knew of some of the supply chain disruptions and – which were, of course drove our outlook that we gave, what happened is sequentially we learned of new supply chain issues in the Luxury warehouse in Germany, and we were also impacted by U.S. hurricane in mid-September, both of these were not known to us and together represents almost 60% of the impact that we suffered in Q1. So out of $60 million almost 60% comes out of these two headwinds, which we were not aware. We also need to remember that September is a peak demand month for Luxury, and clearly, this further exacerbated the impact of the supply chain disruption. And we have to place a lot of actions of course to address and contain the duration of the impact, we are rebalancing the supply chain, we are rebalancing the production and the logistics within our network. We’re working with our supply base better to ensure sufficient component supply and I’ll mention it in your question there, and one of the things we have done because of the disruptions in the magnitude of the disruption in Q1 is that we have made modifications to our consolidation plans for the remainder of the year. And we have delayed or modified pre-planned consolidation that we are going to have and we are going to…

Thank you. Your next question is from Robert Ottenstein of Evercore ISI.

Great, thank you very much. Two questions. Can you talk a little bit about how you’re thinking about promotions on the consumer retail side, on the one hand if it doesn’t seem like you have the products, then why are you doing the promotions, or is it just to accelerate the cleanup of the old inventory in the U.S. mass retailers? And then just kind of stepping back in terms of the whole consumer business, can you give us a little bit more of a sense of what the performance was on the top line for U.S. retail or European retail Younique in Brazil?. Thank you very much.

Thanks Robert for the questions. And when I look at the promotional intensity, this is driven by a couple of issues. One is, yes, we do have supply chain headwinds and problems and that basically means that we have – more of a distributor issue with the retailers, which leads to penalties, because we’re not able to maintain the service level that we are supposed to. So that’s one of the driver of the increased spend. The second one is that, we wanted to increase the support to our brands in store, while we were seeing the issue in the supply chain, but it’s not like that the supply chain issues where across the entire portfolio. And this is why you have these effects. In terms of the consumer beauty performance in the different regions that you mentioned, let me start with the U.S. U.S. is a mix situation because we do have an improvement in CoverGirl, CoverGirl continues to have performance in the mid-single-digit decline, while the rest of the brands is more of a high single-digit decline in the U.S., and when I look at CoverGirl, there is a lot of also positive things which are happening on the brand, which are moving the performance, progressively and sequentially toward a better and slower decline versus the past. And I can potentially talk later about this. And in Europe, now – in Europe, clearly, we suffered, the majority of the supply chain headwinds is happening in consumer beauty in Europe because this is the stronghold region for both Max Factor and Rimmel and the issue we have in our planning hubs in the UK were mostly related to Rimmel and Max Factor. So again, high single-digit decline in Europe because of most of the supply chain, and Brazil is…

Thank you. Your next question comes from Mark Astrachan of Stifel.

Thanks and good morning everybody. I guess couple of sort of housekeeping questions. So if you’re going to get back much of the supply chain related disruptions to the top line, why not keep the sales targets that you had outlined in conjunction with fourth quarter results, and then sort of related to that, how do you think about given some of the challenges in Consumer Beauty that these supply chain disruptions don’t have a more permanent impact on the business? And then the same sort of comment on the Luxury business, so you say you’re getting that back, but obviously this part of the year is a pretty key part of the year, and so why does that have more of an impact on the business? And then just lastly, also somewhat related, given seasonality in the business and the profitability, cash flows in the first half of the year, is part of the withdrawal of guidance in sort of talking about updates next quarter because basically this year is now a wash, as you consider that you can never get back to that level of profitability. So we’re basically looking at fiscal 2020 now as kind of the first year out where results meet whatever your expectations would be?

Thanks, Mark. I’ll try to answer all your questions in the order that you gave it to me. The first one is for the outlook of 2019. Of course, we are working very hard to contain the impact of the supply chain disruption for the first half. But there is potential for future impacts in the second half, and therefore we have limited visibility to the overall impact on 2019 revenues and profits, and we want to take more time to have this assessment. And this is why we told you that we would like to come back next quarter. Despite the headwinds, we continue to expect operating profit and margin improvement and growth in 2019, because we do see significant progress in fixed cost reductions, and we are delivering the synergies, and that’s why we are just saying that we will come to the next quarter. Now, when I look at the specific in the divisions, the first one, I think you ask is Luxury. It is true, true that we are entering into the highest season, and – but we do have a safety stock and it’s not like that the supply chain headwinds that we’re having will stop us from having a strong season, and this is why we have reaffirmed that we will grow revenues and the profits in Q2 in Luxury, and of course we believe in the underlying strong demand for the Luxury business. And of course, we got impacted by the headwinds and the hurricanes of both internal and external and the component shortages, but the underlying demand is strong, and we believe we’ll be able to deliver on our outlook. In Consumer Beauty, as I said, the supply chain really impacted the Rimmel and Max Factor. So it is different and this is a mix of supply chain issues and underlying performance of our business, and I’ve mentioned a lot what are the actual plan that we are doing to turn around the Consumer Beauty. We need to be focused absolutely on strengthening operational discipline in Consumer Beauty, that’s our first focus, plus doing those other strategic changes that I mentioned, including reallocating the capital. Now, in terms of profitability, your last question was, I think I answered your last question in terms of why we are not giving guidance, and we’re going to wait one more quarter, because we understand the profit. And it’s the same for cash flow at the end of the day. So the two things are related, they are very much interlinked. So we do expect positive free cash flow in the next three quarters and report positive free cash flow in 2019, but because of the impacts, we want to wait to give you a specific level of details, and we will do it in the next quarter.

Thank you. Your next question comes from Faiza Alwy of Deutsche Bank.

Yes, hi, good morning. So just two questions from me. One is on the ALMEA performance within Consumer Beauty. So Camillo, I’d love your take on was that in line with expectations, because it seems to me that, that business may have decelerated a little bit, and if you could just focus your comment sort of outside of Brazil? And then my second question is just around, like I understand the specific supply chain issues, but it seems to me that since the P&G acquisitions, there have been a number of like integration-related distraction, so I wonder if you put any new like internal processes, changes anything like, is there a specific team that’s now going to be responsible for some of these execution, integration actions, because it seems to me that there’s been a lot of focus on just synergy realization, and perhaps less so on just the execution. And I understand that you’ve delayed some of these, you’ve modified your plans and delayed some of this transition, but how do we know that when you do go forward with these consolidation plans, you’re not going to encounter sort of similar issues? So just would love your perspective on both of the things. Thanks.

Thanks, Faiza. Looking at ALMEA, I think I mentioned Brazil, quite extensively. So we’re very pleased with that. Look the – actually the driver of the ALMEA was moderately positive, so we grew in ALMEA in Consumer Beauty in the quarter, and with a couple of different dynamics, Brazil was very good as I mentioned, Mexico was also very good, we continue to grow our share, especially in hair color which in Wella, which remains our stronger brand there. And we believe, also we had very good growth there, we had Bourjois which is the number one color cosmetic brand in Middle East, and we’re doing a lot of very strong things there. And also we grew in China, but the China, we had a deceleration of growth, but we are not – we continue to remain confident on our business in China. I think the overall health of our Chinese business across all divisions actually is very strong, and we have the size there that allow us for a lot of opportunities in the future. One of the countries which slow in down in ALMEA, which is actually very sizable country for us is Australia. This is where – Australia performed very, very well in 2018, but Q1 of 2019, I think some executional issues didn’t allow Australia to grow and in the contrary, we had a decline there, and Australia is actually quite sizable for us, so it’s driving down the performance of ALMEA and Consumer Beauty. We believe this is temporary because we have high level of confidence on the health and the potential for continued growth, healthy growth in ALMEA in Consumer Beauty, as we mentioned in our earnings model, and also in our previous call in August. Looking at the supply chain integration disruption, I…

Thank you. Your next question is from Olivia Tong of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Thanks. First just a clarification in terms of your supply chain issues, and I am a bit confused on how – you have all the supply chain issues that have cropped up more recently. You’re delaying some of the consolidation in terms of the manufacturing, you are drawing some of the consolidation, yet, it doesn’t impact the delivery of synergies. Why is that the case?

Thanks Olivia for the question, because, first of all, as we said, we’ve done 80%, it’s remaining 20%. Out of the remaining 20%, the one that we have the risk they were mostly driving simplification and rather than having a lot of cost savings attached to it. Not every single project has a large cost saving attached to it, but many of the projects are supply certification for us, but also for our customers, because we are trying to achieve what we call internally 111, which is one order, one invoice, and one distribution points – one shipment point, and so because of the basically that’s the answer to your question. It’s the simplification, the growth there that is driving some of these plans and the impact on synergies is truly minimal and it completely gets absorbed by the older problems that we are absolutely delivering on target.

Got it. And if I could just follow up with two more unrelated, I know you lot of challenge fragrance brands and made a lot of portfolio changes, but does there need to be more pairing back of the portfolio to get to where you want to get to, and then just one housekeeping, if you could help us in terms of your updated expectations on full year net interest expense and tax rate. Thank you.

Olivia, can I ask you to repeat the question, because, you’re – unfortunately your line is not the best, I couldn’t hear you very well. Can you repeat again?

Okay. I’ll just pick up my phone. But, the first one was just around your portfolio because I know you’ve obviously gotten rid of quite a few of the challenge fragrance brands but does there need to be more pairing back of the portfolio in order to get to where you want to get to? And then just a housekeeping one was around your updated expectations for the full year on interest expense and tax rate.

Okay. So on the portfolio, I think we have done our portfolio rationalization, as you mentioned we have turned back some of the fragrance brand and we don’t expect to have any more rationalization at this point. We’re happy with our portfolio and our focus is absolutely to drive, to continue to drive strong growth from Luxury and Professional Beauty and the thought was clearly is to turnaround the Consumer Beauty with the actual plan that I mentioned before. And so in terms of interest rates and tax rate, so the first one is, from a tax rate, we expect in the low 2020’s around the 22%. So that’s our estimate we have given at the beginning, in the last earnings call and we continue to be committed to this. And in terms of interest expense, we’re pulling in more than around $310 million.

Thank you. Your next question is from Steph Wissink of Jefferies.

Thanks, good morning everyone. I want to come back to Mark’s earlier question on the guidance and the just the past line or the track line here. In your second quarter, Camilla you’re expecting Lux and Pro to return to positive and I think you mentioned down high single-digits in consumer. Can you just help us bridge the transition from Q1 to Q2 on what’s remediation of supply chain versus what your expectations are for underlying improvement and then also update us on any shelf space changes or adjustments to your planned promotions or programs and any impact from the supply chain. Thank you.

Yeah. So from a guidance point of view, yes, you’re correct. So we expect the Luxury and Professional Beauty to go back to more or less approximately the same trend that we had in 2018 basically to revert to growth because the supply chain headwinds will abate although we will still have some supply chain headwinds in Q2, but we believe that our underlying strong demand will be able to offset that one and we are confident with that. And Consumer Beauty is, we’re seeing about higher single-digit decline, this is driven by, first of all the – the resolution or the improvement of the supply chain headwinds, which of course will benefit Consumer Beauty as well from a service level point of view, plus we are putting in place this action that I mentioned before and one important one is clearly a much stronger management for our trade spending and gross-to-net. As you could imagine gross-to-net was – as I mentioned before, impacted by the penalties for the customers were impacted by all these additional promotional activities. Once the supply chain headwinds will abate, we will be able to manage better the spending and then of course we’ll have a positive impact on the revenue decline and there of course is staying higher [indiscernible] Consumer Beauty that I mentioned before, so the operational discipline, the reallocation of investments, the stronger growth of e-commerce that I mentioned before and all these will be – will also benefit from a lesser headwinds on supply chain. I don’t think we should underestimate the impact on the commercial organization from supply chain headwinds of the nature they we’d be dealing with and this will reverse will improve in Q2 – will eventually reverse in the second half of 2019. Regarding your second question,…

Thank you. Your next question is from Joe Lachky of Wells Fargo Securities.

Thanks. I was hoping if you could talk to your free cash flow and how much you think the supply chain issues impacted your working capital in the quarter and then thinking about free cash flow for the full year, I guess, how confident are you in getting growth in free cash flow, positive free cash flow for the full year and then considering the challenges facing you regarding cash flow and your need to focus on deleveraging, how committed are you to the dividend?

So, thanks, Joe. I think the first question is about the free cash flow, yeah, the impact on the net working capital from the supply chain is actually quite severe. If you think about it, we’ve managed better with inventories, but at the same time we got to restore stock because our service levels got hit by the supply headwinds, that’s a very difficult task for the teams to manage better the inventory when we’re building new ones, so we were building safety stock. Second one is on receivable. As you can imagine, improving our terms becomes more challenging for all our commercial teams when we are having a debate and discussions because of the service levels not being where it should be. So without any doubt, the net working capital were hit severely by the supply chain headwinds, and consequentially the ability to deliver the free cash flow of course gets impacted. Now despite that, we are truly focusing the validation on cash, which is something that was not as pronounced strong in the past, especially during the first year or two of the iteration, and that’s why we believe that we’re going to have positive free cash flow in the remaining quarter and in the total year. We are confident also because we’re having, a big attention to our CapEx and to our one-off, although all these profit of course has started a while ago and we are focusing the organization much more on that and we even changed the incentive scheme of all our leaders to make sure the networking capital cash one-off and CapEx are now including in their incentive. The dividend, I think you asked about the dividends. Well, the dividends is – well, my opinion is that we believe capital dividends sent a signal to the market that we have a terminal cash flow problem, which is absolutely not the case. Our free cash flow, as I said should improve in the reminder of 2019 and also in 2020, we will have a material positive benefit by the fact that the CapEx and especially one-time cash costs will drop, will decrease significantly, and this is why I think it’s important to underline that it’s just a temporary problem and not a permanent one.

Thank you. Your next question is from Jonathan Feeney of Consumer Edge Research.

Thanks very much. I just wanted to maybe follow up on the line of questioning earlier about I guess what gives you the confidence that the supply chain issues haven’t really setback the sales process, especially as it relates to Consumer Beauty, you talked about that being contained to Q2 – and Q2 maybe Q3, but can you talk to me about what retailer feedback has been and how do you go about positioning like this execution issue and convincing people that it’s not something that are going, even though you have the great analytics and the products performing on shelf, how do you get the retailer comfortable it’s going to be there? Thanks.

I think it’s a matter of – building strong partnership with the retailers. First of all, it’s about transparency as well, I think we have been very transparent with the retailers explaining the type of issues we were dealing with, and doing in a very timely manner. The one that we knew that I already mentioned in the August call that were completely disclosed, of course to the retailers with a different timeline of returning it to proper service level and the one in Luxury that we had through the hurricane and through the late warehouse issues and to be honest, we went to the retailers and explained the situation because this was unexpected for us as well. But at the end of the day, it’s all about partnership, it’s all about transparency, it’s all about having strong programs to drive consumer demand. And, just going back in Luxury Professional Beauty, our consumer demand is very strong. So of course it is incredibly frustrating for everybody for us and for the retailers, for the customers, but they do know that our customer demand is strong and if we show them plans of restoring service level in the next two, three months, retailers do understand that. We’ve build together plans on how we deal with the shortages, and we readjust the promotional plans or the launch plans in a way that to get – taking consideration of the headwinds. In Consumer Beauty it’s clearly more difficult because this is a mix between the supply issues, but also the fact that some of the brands are not performing where they are, and this is why we do better in the prominent reporting that took place in the execution of innovation in the discipline that I mentioned before and there is absolutely a big, big focus and priority for me and for the Consumer Beauty absolutely.

Thank you. Your next question is from Linda Bolton-Weiser of DA Davidson.

Hi. So, I was curious if you could just update us on the CFO search and how that – how’s that going, and also how is the morale in the company because you’ve brought in a lot of new executives anyways, and then you have these issues developing. So how is the morale in the company? Thanks.

Yes. So, look CFO search what I can update you is that we had a lot of very strong candidates that we’ve been evaluating and we are between the middle and toward the end of our selection processes. So we’ll be able to update you soon on this one, but we are pleased with the quality of the candidates, that very high level of interest into our journey, and a lot of candidates really with very strong background, very strict with our needs in our journey. In terms of morale, it’s a different situation to be crystal clear, because in Luxury and Professional Beauty, we do have two very high performing business, beating the market growth rate and beating expectations. In Consumer Beauty we do have clearly a mixed morale, because of course the performance have not been, I would say close to the expectation now for a while, but this is something that we are working with the leaders. I mean, yes, we do have a new leadership team that is quite recent, or quite new into Consumer Beauty. We continue to drive for the right cultural fit and the right skills to perform the turnaround and when I look at the morale and one of the things that we have done is that we have changed the vesting period of some of the our – of our LTI program to progress investing within three, four and five years, which I think it will also help with the retention of key talent. So overall, what is important is that we do focus on the turnaround of Consumer Beauty which remains our priority and there is a huge belief in the company and our partners and our long-term journey. And this is also very, very reassuring for me and for my colleagues in that. We continue to see very, very high level of loyalty and belief in our journey because everybody is aware that these are temporary headwinds that we’re dealing with, within a very complex integration, but the benefits of the new Coty and the value that we’re creating for the future is absolutely not in doubt.

Thank you. We have reached our allotted time for today’s Q&A session. We thank you for joining today’s call. Please disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.