Earnings Labs

Americold Realty Trust, Inc. (COLD)

Q4 2019 Earnings Call· Thu, Feb 20, 2020

$12.42

+1.26%

Key Takeaways · AI generated
AI summary not yet generated for this transcript. Generation in progress for older transcripts; check back soon, or browse the full transcript below.

Same-Day

-6.80%

1 Week

-16.73%

1 Month

-24.18%

vs S&P

+9.66%

Transcript

Operator

Operator

Greetings and welcome to the Americold Realty Trust Fourth Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Scott Henderson, Investor Relations.

Scott Henderson

Analyst

Good afternoon. We would like to thank you for joining us today for Americold Realty Trust fourth quarter 2019 earnings conference call. In addition to the press release distributed this afternoon, we have filed a supplemental package with additional detail on our results, which is available in the Investors section on our website at www.americold.com. On today's call, management's prepared remarks and answers to your questions may contain forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements address matters that are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from those discussed today. A number of factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, assumptions and beliefs, as well as information available to us at this time and speak only as of the date they are made and management undertakes no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events. During this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. More information about these non-GAAP financial measures and reconciliations to the comparable GAAP financial measures is contained in the supplemental information package available on the company's website. We also would like to note that numbers presented in today's prepared remarks have been rounded to the nearest million with the exception of per share amounts. This afternoon's conference call is hosted by Americold's Chief Executive Officer, Fred Boehler; and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Marc Smernoff. Management will make some prepared comments, after which, we will open up the call to your questions. Now, I will turn the call over to Fred.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Thank you and welcome to our fourth quarter 2019 earnings conference call. This afternoon, I will provide highlights of our full year results and comment on current market conditions. I will then take a moment to update you on our growth activity in a few exciting internal development here at Americold. Marc will follow with a review of our fourth quarter and full year results in more detail and then discuss our balance sheet and outlook for 2020. After our prepared remarks, we will open the call for your questions. Our full year 2019 results reflect the continued execution of our strategy to drive long-term cash flow growth and shareholder value. We did this in three ways. By organically growing our core business, by completing and integrating strategic acquisitions, and by developing advanced temperature-controlled warehouses. We are very pleased with our results on all fronts and ended the year with a portfolio that contains in excess of 1 billion refrigerated cubic feet. This significant growth is even more notable in light of our ability to maintain our financial flexibility and low leverage. For the full year 2019, we grew total revenue by 11.2% and total company NOI by 17.9%. This was driven by growth in our warehouse segment revenue and NOI of 17% and 19.5%, respectively. These strong results came from our recent acquisitions and organic growth. I'm also very pleased to report that our global warehouse same-store pool generated total revenue growth and NOI growth of 3.5% and 5.1%, respectively, on a constant currency basis. We delivered same-store NOI growth that was approximately 160 basis points higher than our same-store revenue growth, and we believe this highlights the strength of the Americold operating platform. Now, let me discuss our acquisition and development activity in more detail. In 2019, we…

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Thank you, Fred and good afternoon everyone. Today, we will provide updates on our actual performance as well as certain metrics on a constant currency basis. I will also provide details on our guidance for 2020. For the fourth quarter, we reported total company revenue of $486 million and total company NOI of $138 million, which reflects a 16.9% increase and a 26.8% increase year-over-year, respectively. Core EBITDA was $109 million for the fourth quarter of 2019, an increase of 28.8% year-over-year. This was driven by our 2019 acquisitions and solid growth within our core portfolio. Our core EBITDA margin grew by 208 basis points to 22.4%. Please note, our strong core EBITDA growth and margin improvement overcame the following factors; the J-curve associated with implementing and aligning our recent acquisitions to the Americold operating system and practices; the start-up expenses related to our recent development projects; and the currency translation impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. For the fourth quarter 2019, we reported net income of $21 million compared to net income of $3 million for the same quarter of the prior year. Our fourth quarter core FFO was $65 million or $0.33 per diluted share. Our fourth quarter AFFO was $60 million or $0.30 per diluted share. As a reminder, the full definition and reconciliation of core EBITDA, core FFO and AFFO to reported net income can be found in our supplemental. For the fourth quarter of 2019, global warehouse segment revenue was $384 million, which reflects growth of 25.6% year-over-year. Global warehouse segment NOI was $130 million, which reflects growth of 28.9%. Global warehouse segment margin was 33.8% for the fourth quarter, an 86 basis point increase compared to the same quarter of the prior year. This increase in margin was primarily due to improvements…

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Thanks Mark. Since the start of 2019, we have closed six acquisitions completed four development projects, started three additional development projects and entered into a new joint venture. As we move into 2020, we are starting with strong momentum, and we will continue to expand our platform to position Americold for our customers around the globe. We would like to welcome the many new associates to the Americold family, who joined us as a part of our recent acquisition. And I'd like to thank all of our team members for their continued hard work and dedication to our success. Finally, we thank our shareholders for their continued support as we focus on driving growth and creating value through 2020 and beyond. Thanks again for joining us today, and we will now open the call for your questions. Operator?

Operator

Operator

Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first questions come from the line of Nate Crossett of Berenberg Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Nate Crossett

Analyst

Hey guys, good evening. And I guess, just question on the Sydney project. What does it mean when you say the scope of the project changed? I mean that was a $600 million potential project. It sounds like that tenant is going to be at this other location. So, what's the total scope of that new project, I guess?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes. I think if you go back, gosh, it's been year and a half, almost two years now, and we entered into an LOI with this particular customer. And it was more than one site. It was multisite; it was looking at their supply chain. Once we entered that LOI, we start to get into detailed design and as we get on through detailed design, things kind of changed and shifted. And remember that we continue to do the current work for them today. This was talking about potentially getting into a new infrastructure, if you will, for the future. And we've gone through several different iterations with them. And as I sit here today, we look at it and we say, we're probably not going to proceed in the way that was originally intended. However, we continue to work with them as evidenced by the newbuild that we're doing over in Auckland, New Zealand for them, with a new 15-year commitment, anchoring that facility. And then we continue to work with them around the rest of Australia, if you will. But at this time, we know that that's not going to be like what we originally had hoped. And we'll continue to work with them as we move forward.

Nate Crossett

Analyst

Okay. So, when we -- that's helpful. Thank you. So, if we're thinking about the drivers of growth this year, is it more just M&A and same-store and margin improvement? Because it looks like there's less development CapEx spend that you're guiding to. We all know the trends in this space seem to be good, but I would have thought there have been more kind of new starts or development CapEx spend if there was a lot of new demand out there for cold storage?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Right. It's hard to comment on timing in specific. And so we've been guiding $75 million to $200 million in new starts for the last two years here. Our pipeline is still in excess of $1.2 billion. We have several great projects that are out there. And I know that some of those will come to fruition here. It's a matter of timing and again, the size and the scale of those differ depending on the particular customer that we're building for. Another key attribute and a reminder to everyone is, we don't build on spec. And so most of our builds, most of our development projects are driven by real customer demand and engagement with those customers and as a result, that timing can kind of move around a bit.

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

One thing I would just add to that as it relates to external growth. We also don't provide guidance on M&A. So, as you've heard us say over the time that M&A in our industry can be somewhat lumpy. That's not to say we're not active having already completed two transactions this year. But there is no further guidance than what's been put forth in the overall guidance.

Nate Crossett

Analyst

Okay, that's helpful. I'll get back in the queue. Thanks.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Great. Thanks.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Emmanuel Korchman of Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Manny Korchman

Analyst · your question.

Hey Maybe Fred or Marc, just following up on that. You talked about the pipeline of development. Can you talk about what your pipeline on acquisitions looks like and split that between U.S. opportunities and international ones?

Fred Boehler

Analyst · your question.

Yes. I mean, what I would say is kind of what we always say; the pipeline of acquisition opportunities is plentiful, both in existing countries as well as the potential to expand into others. We work with and talk to a lot of different folks. And I think I've joked before, you got to kiss a lot of frogs to find the right one that we're looking for. And remember, we're not just acquiring to get big; we're pretty picky and choosy, if you will, in terms of identifying the right acquisitions that we know that can be fully integrated into our enterprise. So, those are going to be lumpy. I can't comment on size and scale of those because it's so unpredictable in terms of when or if those will come to fruition.

Manny Korchman

Analyst · your question.

Great. And just switching to guidance. We do appreciate the added line items that you've given us. I am going to be annoying for a second and say what you haven't given us is the payout ratio. So, what you used to give us, you don't give us. So, how do we think about the dividend and the payout ratio in comparison to the new AFFO per share guidance that you have given us?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst · your question.

Yes. Yes, absolutely. Our Board evaluates our position on a quarterly basis and determines the dividend. So, we would expect further guidance around the dividend to be announced later this quarter, consistent with prior years.

Manny Korchman

Analyst · your question.

But I guess, just as you think about the guidance for the year and sort of cash flow allocation, what level are you assuming in the guidance that you've given?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst · your question.

At this point, I think, especially given the robust development pipeline that Fred mentioned, we would expect payout ratios to be consistent with prior periods, roughly in that 65% to 68%.

Manny Korchman

Analyst · your question.

Thanks.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Michael Carroll of RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Michael Carroll

Analyst

Yes, thanks. I just want to go back to the Woolworths project in Australia. So, what is that customer plan on doing right now, if they don't want to have the, I guess, the three large automated facilities? Do they still have, I guess, growing needs for temperature-controlled space? Are you going to be providing that for them?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes. Remember, as a reminder, we currently have all of their infrastructure for the bulk of their temperature control needs. So we continue to operate those facilities. And, like I said, we're kind of exploring other alternatives. So, is it -- for example, hypothetically, is it better to build a single greenfield automated facility or is it better to expand on to an existing facility? Or is it better to add a conventional facility instead of automation? So, all three of those things continue to be explored. So -- but we have the bulk of their business today, and we'll continue to do so as we have for the last 30 years.

Michael Carroll

Analyst

Okay. And then should we expect, I guess, some smaller projects to be announced? Because, obviously, they had a pretty big growth strategy before that seems to be off the table. But should we still expect and when? I know they did, what, a $40 million project in New Zealand. Is there other $40 million to $50 million projects on tap for the rest of this year?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Potentially, our pipeline is over $1.2 billion.

Michael Carroll

Analyst

Okay, great. And then just last one for me. Can you talk a little bit about your plans with Brazil? I mean how much do you want to -- or can you scale in that market? Or do you plan on just making this initial investment with that joint venture partner and see where that goes currently?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes, we're really excited about this partnership with Patria, down there in Brazil. SuperFrio is one of the leaders in there and they're very much like us. They use the same operating systems; have a lot of similarities in terms of customer base and how they commercialize that business. So we really like that platform down there. It's currently 16 sites. And as we mentioned, they've got growth expectations, both from a development and from an acquisition standpoint. The marketplace down there is very similar to what we see here in the U.S. It's very fragmented. So, there are lots of opportunities. And again, they'll go about it pretty much the same way that we do here. And we'll continue that partnership over the next two years, and we have that ability to buy it out in 2023.

Michael Carroll

Analyst

Thanks.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Sure.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Dave Rodgers of Baird. Please proceed with your question.

Dave Rodgers

Analyst

Hey guys. Good afternoon. I wanted to ask about the physical occupancy and the trends there. You had been trending lower in the first three quarters of the year, year-over-year in the fourth quarter on the same-store basis, you did that back up. So, can you talk a little bit about kind of what your expectations are for physical occupancy as you move into next year? The 2% to 4% revenue guidance, does that assume some increase in occupancy and rate? And can you kind of talk about where that occupancy increase would come from? Thanks.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes, I think the number we reported this quarter was the economic occupancy. Remember, we continue to shift our business and you saw the progress in the fixed commitment. Economic occupancy, yes, we continue to expect it to pick up. We like where it settled into the fourth quarter. As you'll recall, we don't really want it to get that much higher because then you start to drive inefficiency within the operations, which actually results in less cash flow. So, we're trying to drive four-wall cash flow as our primary focus. And you can see that we're doing that regardless of what the physical occupancy might be. And that's just a function of how we commercialize our business. So, rate throughput, fixed commitment. So yes, we expect that it will continue to make progress as we do our portfolio management and onboard new customers and then, of course, open up new capacity to our development opportunities.

Dave Rodgers

Analyst

I guess just looking to that answer, Fred, with 2% to 4% revenue guidance on the same-store, do you expect most of that then to come through rate if you're happy with where occupancy is today?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes. Again, I think, there's lots of occupancy opportunities because of the seasonality of our business, right? So, we're always trying to find ways to find off-cycle type of business that we can put into facilities that maybe have a lower physical occupancy during the summer, for example. So, we believe that there's still whitespace to fill. Most of our occupancy is driven by key markets during the fourth quarter. So actually, if you look at core markets, where our major distribution points are getting product to the consumer during the most critical time of the year, those markets are -- and during the fourth quarter, as we've talked about, those are pushing 90%, 92%, right? So, the number we're quoting is across our entire enterprise. So, we do have sites that have lower physical occupancy during the fourth quarter than the 85%.

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

And Dave, just to reiterate, as you've heard us say before, we're working on maximizing the mix. As Fred said, that drives the most four-wall cash flow there. So, if there's one metric more than anything other, not rate, then occupancy is how do we drive actual four-wall cash flow.

Dave Rodgers

Analyst

Great. And then maybe just a follow-up on that. Is there a mechanism where you would take out Patria? Has there been a predetermined price for that? And the second is, can you just comment on the income tax expense and deferred benefit in the 2020 guidance versus what you did in 2019 and the reason for the change there? Thank you.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes. So, just on the first part, in terms of the takeout of Patria, yes, as we said, we have the exclusive option to buy out the other 85% of the business because we've bought in at 15% come 2023.

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

And then as it relates to the taxes, so the taxes reflect growth in the overall business as well as our recent acquisition into Canada, which, obviously, we will be paying corporate level tax for our operations in Canada at that level, consistent with what we pay in Australia. So, the combination of tax reflects growth of our core businesses abroad, where we do pay cash taxes.

Dave Rodgers

Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Thanks Dave.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Ki Bin Kim of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please proceed with your question.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

Thanks. Good evening everyone. Going back to the Australia development for $600 million. I was wondering if you can just provide a little more details behind it because it was a big deal. It was an important catalyst for your company and your stock. So, I'm just curious, how much is the scope change? Did you lose any of that business for the three buildings to competing developers or other owners? Was it a point of pricing or just something very different than that?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

It's a combination of things, quite frankly. They do own their own wide network. They brought up a fully automated facility that they were tied up with. They've had some other things going on their business changes that I can't really comment on. But you can read the press on them. They've made a lot of divestitures and some other adjustments to their business. And then just during this time horizon -- number one, I just want to remind everybody, it was a letter of intent. It wasn't a binding contract. It is an intent to work with each other. So, we did not lose the business to anybody else. That wasn't what was at play. But over the course of the two years, automation costs certainly increased, steel prices went up. So, construction costs in Australia, land costs in Australia, all of that kind of factored into, if you will, the dances we are going through, detailed design and negotiation. So, no, we haven't lost the business. We have all the business and proceed continuing to, as I mentioned, we'll continue to work with them. And again, that strong pipeline that we have, I'm confident that we'll have additional ways to put capital to work.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

So, you're saying the three buildings that were originally contemplated, there isn't another party doing part of that business? Is that a fair--?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

There are not three automated buildings going up for this customer.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

Okay. And is that micro-fulfillment center part of the reason at all just going a different route instead of like a centralized warehouse, maybe doing that -- or was that part of the equation at all?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

No, that's, I mean, kind of a separate process. I know they are experimenting with micro-fulfillment, but remember that micro-fulfillment's done in the back end of the store and doesn't really supply -- it doesn't really change the supply chain in terms of the physical distribution centers. So, I can't comment further on what they may be doing and that's probably something for you to look at.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

Okay. And it sounds like in the comments, though, you left yourself a little bit of an opening that you might do further development business with them. Could you just expand upon that?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes, I mean, again, I would say that we have a pipeline of $1.2 billion. They are a part of that. We just announced the $42 million that's -- that we're going to put to work in Auckland, which is on their behalf. So we currently house them in several facilities across New Zealand, often being the largest one. We're expanding that site to support their growth. And we've entered into a definitive agreement, not an ROI, a definitive contract for 15 years for them to be the anchor on that expansion. So, I think that just shows the continuing working relationship that we have with them and our partnership with them as we continue to move forward.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

I see. But it's not like there's a chance for the development to happen again in Australia. That's not what you meant, right?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

There's always a chance. We continue the -- the conversations have not been called out, I guess, is the way that I would describe it. So, there isn't an end. We just don't see it happening right now. So, we're just kind of taking that off, and hopefully, it develops into something into the future. But we can't control that 100%. We're kind of at their timing and at their mercy when it comes to that.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst

Okay. Thank you, guys.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Michael Mueller of JP Morgan. Please proceed with your question.

Mike Mueller

Analyst

Yes, hi. If we start off with your AFFO guidance and the CapEx and then back out the non-real estate depreciation and the tax benefit, we get about $1.21 to $1.32. Is that your core FFO guidance for the year?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes. The -- what we did is we provided the core reconciling items and that's not inconsistent with our thought. I think, Mike, the key thing we really do want to emphasize about our business, since we believe AFFO is the best metric, is to understand our overall business. Just because there's a significant operational component as well as true cash CapEx in the business that we want to make sure is being captured, which isn't necessarily captured in either the navy definition of FFO or even our adjusted definition of core. So, we view as the most relevant metric for our business that best approximates the cash flow we generate to be our adjusted funds from operation.

Mike Mueller

Analyst

Got it. Yes, it's just the FFO numbers get reported a lot and obviously come up in discussions quite a bit. So--

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Yes.

Mike Mueller

Analyst

Okay. And the second question was for Brazil, what's the magic about 2023? What happens then, where you can buy it out?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Marc?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes. Yes, it's -- we're investing with a private equity investor that has a finite life of their funds. And so we're working with them, and we have a plan with them to grow the business through that period, and that was an ideal day for us to make a decision. And as Fred mentioned earlier, we have an exclusive call right, if we want to purchase in the rest of the business.

Mike Mueller

Analyst

Got it. Okay, that was it. Thank you.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Bill Crow of Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Bill Crow

Analyst

Good evening guys. Apologize for asking one more on Australia. As you underwrite the health of the tenant, has anything changed with them? Is the scope changing because their outlook has changed?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

No, absolutely not. They're the premier grocer in that marketplace. Their business continues to be strong. So, no, no underwriting concerns there whatsoever.

Bill Crow

Analyst

That's fine. I think seasonality came up earlier. And I'm just wondering if you could help us think about the seasonalities evolves into 2020. Should we consider that kind of the same contribution per quarter that we saw in 2019 would play out again in 2020 or has that changed because of your acquisitions?

Fred Boehler

Analyst

No, it's pretty much the same pattern. I mean there's some commodities that have different types of patterns, but -- like ice cream or like some of the harvest, if you will, the vast bulk of our product follows the same cyclicality every single year. Fourth quarter, kind of, the end of third quarter, fourth quarter is the busy time of the year for us. That's when all the volume is getting pushed out to support Thanksgiving and Christmas. And I think you saw that in our fourth quarter results and if you go back a year ago, you see the same thing.

Bill Crow

Analyst

All right. And then two quick financial questions for you. G&A continues to ramp-up. And given the J-curves we're dealing with and postponed developments and different things, I'm just -- I'm trying to get my arms around the pace at which it's ramping up vis-à-vis that what it's delivering to the bottom-line? And at the top end of your guidance, I think, it'd be about 8.5% increase in 2020. So at what point do you get to the size of the headquarters that you need so we don't see G&A continued ramp-up at this rate, that's four or five times CPI?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes. No, absolutely. And I think there's two things around that, just to understand. So, we maintain a lot of our own in-house development resources. So, the engineering teams, our project management offices that are working on our development project. We have a tremendous -- as we just announced, we have effectively four completed projects where we don't even have the benefit of the stabilized earnings yet in our stream. So, those will be ramping up throughout this year and really beginning to stabilize in 2021 and beyond. And then we have other development projects underway. So, I think what you see -- and this is typical of development, you see those costs come on in advance. And then you get the benefit as those projects ramp and reach stabilization, which you'll then start to see the G&A leverage, especially as you're looking at as a percentage of revenue.

Bill Crow

Analyst

All right. And then finally for me. Since we spent an hour last quarter talking about a $3 million health care cost, the $10 million -- the $10 million acquisition litigation and other charge, if you could give us some details on that? It's -- and I think its $40 million for the year. So, how do we think about what was in there for the fourth quarter? And what happens going forward?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes, if you turn -- if you look at page 22 of our supplement, it's broken out. The vast majority of that $40 million for the year is M&A-related costs, specifically for professional fees, success fees to bankers, synergies related to rationalizing the headcount from the Cloverleaf facility. So, we have a lot of severance costs, which we see down in the line below. And then litigation, which is disclosed in our 10-K, but we did settle one outstanding litigation case that we had in the quarter, which was roughly the $3 million charge you see in Q4.

Bill Crow

Analyst

Okay. Thanks.

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Sure. Thanks Bill.

Operator

Operator

Our next questions come from the line of Emmanuel Korchman of Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Manny Korchman

Analyst

Hey Marc, just a couple of guidance follow-ups. You spoke about the forward drawdowns that you've taken so far. How do we think about the rest of the timing of the forward drawdowns?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes. So, our capital plan does not have a drawdown, the forward, to meet the guidance. Now, as Fred mentioned, we have a significant amount of both development and M&A opportunities we are looking at. So, we may draw that down to support those growth opportunities as we move forward.

Manny Korchman

Analyst

So, in the past, I think you've given us the share assumption in your guidance number. What is that share assumption for the year and now for 2020?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes, roughly, as I mentioned, pro forma for having completed the acquisitions we completed this January, we mentioned that we had roughly 205 million shares outstanding.

Manny Korchman

Analyst

And there's nothing beyond that assuming the guidance number?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

There's regular dilutive impact of your annual equity grants with these.

Manny Korchman

Analyst

Okay. And then a follow-up on Bill's question or joke, the -- should we think about any other sort of outside costs on health care or other that would be -- we'd be tapping just thinking this year's and replicating for next year?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst

Yes. No, look, as I said, one of the things, and I think we mentioned this on Q3, and it gave us guidance -- or comfort, we're really proud, like, we delivered 3.5% same-store revenue growth on a constant currency basis, net 5.1%. And those overcame, as we said, we would -- the headwind we saw in health care throughout the year as well as the unfavorable comp we had in the first quarter as it relates to workers' comp. And so those actual -- those results I gave you are the actual results, they're not pro forma for those items. So, as we mentioned, one of the reasons you hear us say over and over and over again, please look at our business on a full year basis. It does reflect out the seasonality and usually, those types of expansion, when you look on a full year basis, will be normalized through the overall business.

Manny Korchman

Analyst

Thanks.

Operator

Operator

Our next question comes from the line of Ki Bin Kim of SunTrust Robinson Humphrey. Please proceed with your question.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst · your question.

Thanks. It's not a question about Australia. So, can you just talk about the business trends that you're seeing? Just if you can expand on those. And it was interesting to see your economic obviously pick up a little bit for the first time in a while. What kind of drove that? Do you think that's sustainable into 2020? And conversely, your same-store revenue growth for your rent revenue growth decelerated a little bit. I don't want to split hairs here, but if you can talk about what drove that?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst · your question.

Yes, you usually don't see that expand too much in the fourth quarter because you're already -- we're already established, if you will. So, yes, and speaking specifically, this is some of what the impact of mix will be within our business. So, you can see we'll have different mix. And as we said, we focus on mix and profiles that maximize cash flow. So, sometimes you'll -- that will manifest our occupancy. Sometimes it will manifest through the throughput of the business that we're doing. And I think if you look, the real headwind on the rate, on occupancy, in the fourth quarter was actually FX. So, if you look on a constant currency basis, the rate continued to grow. So, we had some headwind from the strength of the U.S. dollar.

Fred Boehler

Analyst · your question.

But the business as a whole continues to be strong. So, the same fundamentals that we've talked about over the last two years remain there. Our churn rate is extremely low. So we're providing outstanding customer service, customer satisfaction. We continue to expand our penetration with customers through these acquisitions and commercialize them onto our Americold standards, as well as continuing to roll out the Americold operating system. So, business fundamentals are -- continue to be strong. Consumption, population growth continues to remain steady, and we continue to feed off of the trends that you see in the industry towards fresh and healthy products. So, yes, the pipeline hasn't flinched. We continue to have over $1.2 billion worth of development opportunities. So, yes, I'd say that the business and the industry, as a whole, is strong.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst · your question.

And on G&A guidance for 2020. How much of that is real cash dollars increasing versus capitalization of G&A rolling off?

Marc Smernoff

Analyst · your question.

There's very limited G&A that we capitalized in the year. It's probably less than $2 million or so a year that is capitalized into our development projects. So, it's not a lot of G&A rolling from what was been capitalized or not. It's -- remember, we've completed, as Fred mentioned, a significant number of acquisitions since the beginning of 2019, that reflects the impact of those businesses onboarding, because some of those acquisitions, two were platform acquisitions in new markets, where we didn't operate. So, obviously, part of what we're investing in is those strong teams in those markets where we hope to partner with them and grow those businesses.

Ki Bin Kim

Analyst · your question.

Okay. Thank you.

Fred Boehler

Analyst · your question.

Thanks Ki Bin.

Operator

Operator

We have reached the end of the question-and-answer session. I will now turn the call back over to management for any closing remarks.

Fred Boehler

Analyst

Great. Thank you. And thanks, everyone, for joining us. We are very excited about what we were able to accomplish in 2019. And just to reiterate some of those things, the strong same-store sales results of 3.5% and 5.1% showed that we continue to show great leverage in our business and we're excited about being able to continue that as we head into 2020. The six acquisitions, seven development projects, the new JV that we just entered into and a strong development pipeline just really sets us up well for 2020. So, very excited heading into 2020. And just to -- like to thank all of you for your continued support.

Operator

Operator

This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.