Greetings and welcome to the NCI Building Systems' Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and answer-session will follow the formal presentation [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ms. Darcey Matthews, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, Ms. Matthews, you may begin.

Good morning and thank you for your interest in NCI Building Systems. Joining me today for the call are Don Riley, our CEO; and Brad Little, our CFO. Please be reminded that the following comments regarding the company's results and projections may include forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These risks are described in detail in the company's SEC filings, earnings release, and supplemental slide presentations. The company's actual results may differ materially from the anticipated performance or results expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. The following comments also contain certain non-GAAP measures. These non-GAAP measures are performance measures that provide supplemental information that NCI believes are useful to analysts and investors to evaluate ongoing results of operations when considered alongside other GAAP measures such as net income, operating income, and gross profit. Such measures are not prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and should not be construed as an alternative to reported results determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. You will find a reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures and other related information in the earnings release and supplemental presentation located on our website. In conjunction with the proposed transaction, NCI has filed a proxy statement to obtain the approval of its shareholders for the proposed merger of NCI and Ply Gem. Shareholders of NCI are urged to carefully read the important information contained in the proxy statement, including all amendments and supplements, and other documents related to the merger. NCI and its respective Directors and executive officers may be deemed to be participants in the solicitation of proxies from NCI stockholders in connection with the proposed merger. Information about the persons who may be deemed as participants in the solicitation of the company stockholders in connection with the merger, including a description of their direct and indirect interests by security holdings or otherwise, will be set forth in NCI's definitive proxy statement and other filings with the SEC. Our third quarter 2018 earnings results were released last night. A copy of both the release and our supporting supplemental presentation can be found in the Investors section of our website. This morning, Don will make a few comments about the quarter, the merger, and some of our key initiatives; and then turn the call over to Brad for more specific financial commentary before we open up the call to your questions. And now I'd like to turn the call over to Don.

Thanks Darcey. Good morning everyone. Thank you for joining us today to review our 2018 third quarter results. We delivered another positive quarter that turned out to be in line with our internal expectations and demonstrated the NCI team's ability to achieve strong results in a period of macroeconomic headwinds. For Q3, NCI's year-over-year revenues and adjusted EBITDA were up 17% and 26% respectively, and adjusted earnings per share were up 89%. Our consolidated backlog grew 12% and bookings and quoting activity remained positive. Our performance to date has positioned us well for the remainder of 2018 and into 2019. Led by commercial discipline, we were able to offset the ongoing inflation in material, freight, and labor costs. Anecdotally, average freight costs have risen approximately 10% to 15% year-over-year with spot rates as high as 25% to 30% year-over-year. While our gross profit margin was essentially flat versus last year, we were able to expand gross margin in our buildings business against the prior year and sequentially for NCI as a whole. As noted on our past two earnings calls this year, we have a lot of experience in dealing with these periods of rising inflationary pressures and continue to remain confident in our ability to manage through them. We continue to expect low rise non-residential construction starts to grow mid-single digits, with the addressable markets for our legacy businesses growing 2% to 4%. Insulated Metal Panels, based upon increasing market penetration to continue to grow at low-double-digit rates. Our current backlog and incoming order rates across our businesses continue to support these baseline assumptions. As discussed previously, we have three key areas of focus around cost efficiency and growth, which will drive $40 million to $50 million of incremental profitability through 2020. First, the implementation of advanced manufacturing, where…

Thank you, Don. As is customary, we have issued a press release discussing our results and additional analysis and a supplemental information which is now posted on our website. My comments this morning are designed to add additional color on our financial results for the quarter and update our expectations for the fourth quarter and full year. Our consolidated external revenues were up 17% year-over-year to $549 million, which was above the upper end of our guidance range and reflects double-digit increases in each of our four business segments. While we did achieve year-over-year volume growth, especially in products manufactured by the company, the majority of the increase is related to commercial discipline. Several price increases announced earlier in the year have allowed us to stay ahead of a prolonged inflationary environment and most of -- and which most of our input costs continued to rise. These include not only raw materials such as steel, chemicals, and paint, but also transportation and labor costs. In terms of volume growth, external gains primarily came in the buildings and components segments reflective of the bookings and backlog levels we saw earlier in the year. As we communicated in our previous call, the rising cost environment is motivating customers to accelerate delivery to avoid further price increases where possible. This pulled some orders from the third quarter into the second quarter and as expected, it pulled some from the fourth quarter into the third quarter. Consolidated gross margin of 24.3% was just below the midpoint of our guidance range and while slightly down year-over-year was up 150 basis points sequentially. The product mix within our IMP segment was the primary contributor to the slight margin decline year-over-year as the sales of cold storage and commercial and industrial panels continued to outpace the higher…

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Lee Jagoda with CJS Securities. Please proceed with your question.

Hi good morning.

Good morning.

Good morning Lee.

So, just starting with the acquisition that Ply Gem announced last night. Can you talk about the pre-synergy levels of EBITDA there and how to think about timing of the expected synergies to get back to that 4.5 or 4.4 times purchase price?

Sure. So, what we've stated publicly is that they paid $190 million on a revenue of $440 million and that the multiple pay was approximately 10 times, and given the effect for synergies, it comes in at about 4.4 times, and as we said, that makes us leverage neutral relative to the merger that we've announced. And the synergies come about half from procurement and then the balance come from manufacturing, logistics, and SG&A. And so, we anticipate that you'll be able to get some of that in the first year, but it'll be over the similar horizon that we have outlined for the synergies associated with the Ply Gem merger.

Got it. So, day one, it'll have, call it, $19 million of EBITDA, ramping towards that 4.4 times over two, three years.

Approximately.

Okay. And I assume that was not in the preliminary proxy bank estimates?

No, it was not.

Okay.

I think that the EBITDA calculation is slightly off, that you did. We'll get that number for you, but I think it's -- I think you're a little bit lower.

Well, you were saying you paid 10 times on -- you paid $190 million, which is 10 times.

When I say we, it wasn't we. So, just to be clear.

Sure, sure, sure.

Yes.

And then in terms of your core business, how does the forecast you provided for fiscal Q4 compare to the EBITDA forecast for 2018 that you provided when the Ply Gem merger was announced?

Sure. So, a couple things. One, the number that we just gave is our guidance, and then the numbers that you've seen in the proxy and that we've used from an investor perspective was a financial perspective to evaluate the overall investment as well as our forecast. And so right now we're showing in our guidance, if you take the midpoint, that we're going to come in at approximately $200 million. And I think the calendar year 2018 number that you saw in the investor materials was also $200 million, and it's probably reasonably conservative when you roll in the remaining two months of the year on a trailing 12-month view.

Got it. Sure. Okay. Thanks. I'll hop back in.

All right.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks. Good morning. It looks like you guys had some big inventory and receivable cash flow headwinds in the quarter. Can you just talk about what was going on there and what you're seeing for Q4? And how overall cash flow might shape up for the year?

Great question Steve. This is Brad. So, escalating commodity costs are utilizing more working capital dollars this year than last year, obviously, with the increase in steel prices. Overall, our working capital metrics are continuing to improve, but as we pass-through these higher costs, it is inflating some of our inventory and receivable balances, it’s just natural. As we move into the remainder of the year, we expect this to normalize and show year-over-year improvement year-over-year, but we're continuing to see the investment in working capital.

Okay and that's helpful. And what do you think might be the swing between the low end and the high end of your gross margin target for Q4? Would that be mixed [ph] and what does your current backlog tell you about mix for Q4 at the moment?

So, as you mentioned, our visibility comes from what we see in our backlog and recent booking trends. And we generally expect to see similar product mix between Q3 and Q4, and we believe we're priced accordingly for the rising input costs. That's where we're deriving our margin.

And so, I would expect to see a consistent mix in Q4 that we've seen in Q3.

Okay. Thanks very much.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Scott Schrier with Citi. Please proceed with your question.

Hi good morning.

Good morning Scott.

First question I've got, just on the backlog, can you give us any sense for parsing it out between tonnage and price in both buildings and the overall backlog?

Yes Scott. So the growth is predominantly price, but volume has also contributed. The volume growth that we've seen is consistent with what we've communicated in the past, low-single-digit growth for our legacy business and low-double-digit growth for IMP business.

Got it. Okay. And then in buildings obviously it's been a few years since we've seen a double-digit-margin quarter, and I think last time it was more in a declining cost environment. So, I'm curious if you can parse out that 280 bps increase maybe into different buckets and talk about how it was relatively a very good margin quarter there and if that's something that's sustainable or if there's anything that's one-off in there that we should consider.

Just to clarify your question, Steve, is -- you're talking, Scott, sequentially from Q2 to Q3, or year-over-year?

No, just year-over-year, and I mean you had a pretty strong operating margin in buildings for the quarter, and I just wanted to see what's kind of the different buckets in from that?

Sure. So, the increased volume that we had this year; obviously, it improved our utilization and manufacturing and fixed-cost structure. So, we did have some leverage there year-over-year. The other thing is just being proactively ahead of the rising costs, both inflation and steel and wage has allowed us to really get ahead of that. And so that, along with the commercial discipline and some of the other pricing initiatives that we've had, has helped us stay ahead.

You have to think it'd be pretty balanced across those. The team has done a good job. And then the initiatives have definitely been taking effect and starting to show through in the bottom-line, so you also saw improvements in ESG&A. So, I would say it's been balanced between manufacturing leverage and ESG&A and commercial discipline. And I'm really pleased with the job that that team has done.

Great. Thank you.

Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Ms. Matthews for any closing remarks.

Thank you, Michelle and thank you everyone for your time today. And we look forward to speaking with you soon. Have a good day.