Hello, and welcome to the CNH Industrial Third Quarter Conference Call. Please note this conference is being recorded. [Operator Instructions] I will now hand you over to your host, Jason Omerza, Vice President of Investor Relations to begin today's conference.

Thank you, Francois. Good morning, and good afternoon to everyone. We would like to welcome you to the webcast and conference call for CNH Industrial's third quarter results for the period ending September 30, 2023. This call is being broadcast live on our website and is copyrighted by CNH Industrial. Any other use, recording or transmission of any portion of this broadcast without the expressed written consent of CNH Industrial is strictly prohibited. Hosting today's call are CNH's CEO, Scott Wine; and CFO, Oddone Incisa. They will use the material available for download from the CNH website. Please note that any forward-looking statements that we might make during today's call are subject to the risks and uncertainties mentioned in the safe-harbor statement included in the presentation material. Additional information pertaining to factors that could cause actual results to differ materially is contained in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as well as other periodic reports and filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. And the equivalent reports and filings with authorities in the Netherlands and Italy. The company presentation includes certain non-GAAP financial measures. Additional information including reconciliations to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures is included in the presentation material. I will now turn the call over to Scott.

Thank you, Jason. And thanks everyone for joining our call. Our third quarter results were disappointing. But they also reflect the earnings power of CNH as we dealt with the challenging market environment in South America. The sustained strength of our North American row crop and construction equipment demand continues to be helpful offset to slowing demand in Brazil and Continental Europe. Better efficiency with operational improvements, supply chain normalization and productivity gains from our many CNH Business System initiatives, helped drive record third quarter EBIT margins in both agriculture and construction. Our Tech evolution is accelerating the development of innovative customer driven solutions with key acquisitions, strategic investments and a deep and talented team, we are largely in possession of the in-house capabilities to build out our tech stack and fulfill customers precision needs. I am pleased to welcome the employees of Hemisphere, who joined the CNH family in early October. We are redoubling our efforts on cost savings and working capital efficiency. Concurrent with the spinoff of Iveco in 2022, we streamlined our corporate structure and eliminated about 20% of the managerial positions. After almost two years of operating as an Ag and construction pure play, we understand how to further optimize in support of our customers and dealers. Today, we are initiating an immediate restructuring program to achieve a 5% reduction in salaried workforce cost to be substantially completed by year end. This will be coupled with a comprehensive rightsizing of the company's cost structure to be implemented early next year. We expect these two initiatives to deliver a run rate reduction of 10% to 15% of total labor and non-labor SG&A expenses. Additionally, we've announced today that we have formally applied to delist from Milan exchange, which Oddone will discuss in more detail. Company revenues for…

Thank you, Scott, and good morning, good afternoon to everyone on the call. Third quarter net sales of industrial activities of $5.3 billion were down about 3% at a constant currency year-over-year. This was mainly due to lower industry demand in Agriculture segment, especially in South America, partially compensated by carryover price realizations in both segments. As demand slowed, we produced around 20% fewer low horsepower tractors in Q3, 2023 globally, compared to a year ago. While on our high horsepower tractors, production was up 13% and on combined was up 8%, with only South America plants down double-digits for the three categories. Construction machine production schedules, were up 20% globally, except for South America where we reduce assemblies in view of the slowing demand. Low EBIT margin in both segments were up year-over-year, industrial EBIT margin for CNH was slightly down in the quarter. Our unallocated costs were higher in 2023, due to inflationary impacts on support expenses and non-recurring favorable items in 2022. Adjusted net income for the quarter was $570 million, with adjusted diluted earnings per share of $0.42 up $0.01 versus last year. Free cash flow from industrial activities was an outflow of $127 million, consistent with the seasonality of working capital in the third quarter. The September year-to-year - year-to-date figure of $440 million outflow is $39 million better than the $453 million outflow from the first nine months of 2022. Agriculture net sales were down 4% in constant currency this quarter, driven in large part by pullbacks in demands in South America. We have reacted with lower production and lower deliveries to our dealers. Gross margin was 25.6%, a 60 basis point improvement compared to last year. As, price realization continues to more than compensate for the long tail of inflation in our material…

Thank you, Oddone. For our 2023 industry outlook, we have lowered our estimates for South America, in all businesses and product categories. Given the weakened demand there. The pronounced decline in combines is especially unhelpful, given our market leading presence. We also expect slightly lower demand in Asia Pacific. We have further lowered expectations for small tractors in North America, while increasing them for large tractors as demand for cash crop equipment remains strong. We also project slightly better demand for heavy equipment - heavy construction equipment in North America and for light construction equipment in EMEA. Last quarter, I said our full year net sales would be contingent upon retail demand, as we are moderating production in wholesales accordingly. With the South American market weaker than we foresaw, we are updating our financial guidance. We now see projected net sales growth of 3% to 6% versus 2022, and free cash flow of $1 billion to $1.2 billion. We reaffirm our SG&A to be up no more than 5% compared to 2022 at constant currency and our combined R&D and CapEx spending of about $1.6 billion. Q4 net pricing will be about flat year-over-year as we will need to increase some incentive programs to address pockets of excess dealer inventory. Volumes in Q4 will be down year-over-year and where we fall in the range again depends on retail demand. I also previously noted that this year we'll likely be able to achieve some of the 2024 EBIT margin and EPS targets from our 2022 Capital Markets Day. Despite this lower sales outlook that statement holds true. And we still expect to get our adjusted EPS target of around $1.70. We are confident that our margin expansion efforts will allow us to better sustain profitability through the industry cycle. As shown…

[Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Steven Fisher from UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Good morning. You mentioned that there's going to be some incentives to help move some inventory in Q4. You also mentioned you have the order books open in the first half of 2024. Just curious to what extent do we know at this point about whether those incentives are going to be extending into those 2024 first half orders, or is that sort of a different set of kind of pricing card?

No, that's a great question, Steven. Let's definitely not confuse the two. The Q4 discussion around getting flat pricing was related to actions to drive retail performance. So we're talking about incentives for retail performance, not to incentivize people to take orders from us. That's actually lowering list prices, which were not - we've been very clear that we're not planning to do.

Okay.

It's really about just driving retail, that's what we're trying to do.

Okay, that's very helpful. And I guess just a bigger picture question, I guess I'm curious for how you see what's different in '24 versus '23. That's actually now taking volumes down. I mean it's not terribly surprising given what we've seen in the Ag commodity prices, but farm income is going to be down in '23 also and there's a phase out of bonus depreciation this year, but still, '23 shows some growth. So is it just sort of the magnitude of the decline that's kind of crossed a threshold where it makes a difference? Or is it the used values or is it interest rates or there's like a tale of time that just has to play out for this demand decline to play out?

Well, we still strongly believe in the sound fundamentals of the agriculture industry for the long term, especially in Brazil, where we're seeing weakness now, I mean the fundamentals couldn't be better, but the setup for 2024 is certainly not ideal. Higher interest rates are certainly weighing on. When I talk to farmers, they are just considering, do I want to take that new product. And if they are financing it. It's a good bit more expensive now, so that is a consideration for them. Specifically in Brazil, they're just really worried about the soft commodity prices and they're waiting for those to come back. And I think if we see a rebound, for whatever reason, in soft commodity prices, I think it really gives a boost, especially to Brazil. But for most markets, we're just not anticipating that in 2024. So we're being prudent with dealer inventories, and we'll certainly be able to take advantage if the market turns out to be better. But our initial outlook, and I think it's triangulated by what we're seeing, by almost everybody else prognosticating, is it's going to be slightly less than this year.

Okay, thanks, Scott.

Your next question comes from the line of Nicole DeBlase from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks, good morning guys.

Good Morning.

Maybe just for - just first starting with the restructuring, the $200 million that you guys are talking about taking, what is the expected annual savings related to that program? And is that separate from what you've already guided for '24 and '25 - sorry, '23 and '24? Or is this completely incremental?

In terms of restructuring That's incremental and that's also incremental to the general - COGS cost reduction of $550 million that we are working on and that we started delivering this year. in terms of spending...

Okay.

A chunk of it will be this year because we are taking immediate actions on a headcount right now as we speak, and the remainder will be in the first part of next year.

Okay, thanks, Oddone. That's helpful. And then shifting to dealer inventories. Can you guys talk a little bit about how you see current dealer inventories just around the world? And if you still think that you can kind of produce in line with retail demand as we move into '24? Thank you.

Yes, we've seen over the last couple of years just wild swings. We went from racing to catch up and struggling to catch up with dealer inventories. And then certainly in the low horsepower tractors, as we've talked about for quarters now, that slowed down rather quickly. We've got what I call pockets of inventory that are too high and pockets that are too low. I'd say net-net, I would call it a mid-single digit percent high that we'd like to get rid of. So it's really not dramatic. So I believe if we can get retail up and again, that is our focus, working with our dealers to drive retail, we'll be able to keep wholesale shipments in line.

Thanks, Scott. I'll pass it on.

The next question comes from the line of Michael Feniger from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Yes, thank you for taking my question. I know that you guys kept the EPS where it is, but you cut the free cash flow. Free cash flow was down year-over-year in the quarter. It looks like there was a negative use from cash from ops for Financial Services, net of eliminations. Can you just talk about your conviction on hitting the free cash flow in the fourth quarter? Just trying to understand the moving pieces with that cut. Is it just the cuts, than net sales? And as we look to next year, is $1 billion of free cash flow still kind of the base case we kind of think about for next year? Just love to get any sense on that. Thank you.

Yes, Mike. You got it. The reduction in free cash flow is mainly linked to the reduction in sales and some of the slowdowns in production we have. And basically, we probably will have some level of higher company inventory compensated by lower dealer inventory, which are not part of our cash, of our working capital. In terms of next year. It's early to talk about next year, but we think that our 70% cash conversion rate is still consistent with the overall structure of our business over time. So we would target that range of cash generation for the year.

Thank you. And just if I could add, I understand you're saying volumes potentially are likely down next year. There's, these cost savings numbers that we're looking at, plus the restructuring just can Ag margins hold flat if volumes are down 5%, 10% is that kind of the range what we should be bracketing? Are we kind of looking at down 10% to 20%. And in that case, obviously, absorption becomes a bigger headwind. Just curious if we kind of talk about these moving pieces with volumes likely down next year, but these big cost saving numbers coming in next year. Thank you.

I really like to give a shout out to Derek Nielson and the work that he and his team are doing on this very topic. I think just to respond to your question, if it's down 10%, yes, we can hold margins flat. If it's down 20%, that's a heavier lift. But I wouldn't want to bet against the team to find a way to get there. But no, the team's really been focused on driving margin performance and we're seeing the benefits of that now.

Your next question comes from the line of David Raso from Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. A little more of a longer term and then more of a shorter term. Sort of to the point you just made when you were considering this incremental cost reduction program, right, the 10% to 15% of SG&A. What magnitude of revenue decline were you assuming just there had to be some relationship to how you saw your revenue next year, to the tough decision to take this kind of cost out on the SG&A? And in the same vein of some of those hard decisions, were you thinking of those cuts in relationship to a traditional kind of two year downturn that we see in AG? I know we've seen some longer ones, but maybe this one could be a little shorter. I'm just trying to get a sense of this incremental decision, how you thought about next year. And really even more importantly, is this trying to enter a couple of year downturn and that was the magnitude of the cuts? And then the shorter term question. And I appreciate all that you're doing to offset some of the weakness in the market, but in the fourth quarter, your revenue growth sequentially, it's a normal 15% to 20%. In fact, it's 21% implied. Why such the strong incremental revenue 3Q to 4Q if we're trying to prepare a bit for a weaker '24? Thank you.

All right, I'll take the first one and let Oddone take the second one. First of all, we don't take any action or activity as it relates to our headcounter employees lightly. We really - it's not something, we ever want to do because we invest a lot in our team and it's a difficult action to take, but it's not a reaction to the market. It really is. When we did the spin off from Iveco, we took a shot at getting organized and understanding how we be. We've just learned a lot about where we are as a company and how we can be more efficient. We do a lot of employee surveys and we get a lot of feedback that despite a focus on being agile and customer focused, it's still difficult to do sometimes. So this is really about not a level of decrease in volume next year, but it's just recognizing that the market is not going to grow like we've seen over the past several years. And we need to think about what's the proper structure to deal with that as effectively and as efficiently as we can to create a better working environment for our employees and better for our customers. That's what we're striving to do and we see a good opportunity to do that. And we think the timing is right.

And David, on the question -

Sorry Oddone, go ahead.

If you think you're going to bait me into a comment on the cycles, try again.

Well, no, I'm just I'm just trying to be thoughtful around those are hard decisions to make and we knew the SG&A staying below 5%, it was getting hard, right. I mean, you're implying the fourth quarter SG&A is going to be flat, despite revenues up 20%, right? So we needed to take some action and I appreciate those are not easy decisions. But when you were putting pen to paper. I was just trying to think about. It's never easy to let people go, obviously not always easy to hire people, nowadays, find, good people. Just trying to think about. Yes, we're just going to approach this as a typical downturns too. Yes, we've seen three and tougher - three years and tougher eras. But I was just trying to get a sense of how you were really approaching this from a real structural view of the cycle. So, not trying to bait you, just this is tough decisions made and that's -

No. It was - putting the through the cycle margin chart together was actually helpful for us, and especially if you look at it in the middle of the chart, which reflects 100% of the market, and we're still talking about playing above that middle ground line. So it's not like - the fundamentals in Ag are just too good for a major downturn. It's just - we've seen a lot of demand, we've seen dealer inventories normalize, and we think it's going to be a little bit slower next year. But we don't - if you compare to past downturns in the market, we fully just don't see that coming right now.

That's helpful. I appreciate the discussion. Thank you.

And David, on your second question about the growth in the fourth quarter. Yes, you noticed, the growth that we have sequentially fourth quarter to third quarter is pretty typical in our return on sales and is predicated on higher retail sales in the fourth quarter, which are also typical for our business and for the way our dealers and our farmers, operate.

But I guess that was the decision. Do we get the typical sequential revenue growth, which is what you're exactly correct, that's the normal third or fourth quarter. But the decision was to get that revenue. We're willing to clear out a bit with pricing, which is fine. That was the decision, right. Without that incentive, we probably wouldn't get the sequential revenue, but at least it clears out some inventory going into '24, which I appreciate. Okay thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Timothy Thein from Citi. Please go ahead.

Excuse me and apologies in advance on the voice issue here. But in context with the pricing for Ag, you've talked about, can you kind of just give us a sense in terms of your expectations and what you're seeing on the cost side in Ag and just maybe a little bit longer preview into '24 in terms of, again, just kind of the trend lines and what you can see through contract negotiations and the like as to that relationship and get more on the cost side? And then I guess the second question I'll just ask them at once, Scott, is just on the - obviously, you don't do presales for every product, but what you have seen in terms of presales and where you're taking orders into '24? Is that - can you just give us a sense in terms of how much that's informing you about the volume outlook into '24 i.e., Just some kind of sense in terms of what you have seen in terms of that order uptake? Thank you.

Yes, as we've said, throughout the year, we've seen a moderating cost. And if you look at our EBIT margins as we're getting carryover pricing but not significant pricing going forward, we're seeing that cost curve bend down to a level. I mean, moderating inflation is still inflation, and we're seeing that, but we're also seeing really good work by our team specifically on logistics lanes and other costs. Our strategic sourcing, actually, we have our first review tomorrow and we'll continue to get through that. And we still see the double digit savings that we talked about in that - in those categories. We still see that come into fruition. But that's a longer term benefit. But it really is the lean activities that we're driving through CBS, the focus on logistics improvement we're able to push back on cost. And I said earlier in the year that it was going to be the year of cost, not price like last year. And the team is really delivering on that. And I think you're going to see that cost benefit show up for us for the next several quarters to come. We're not giving guidance on '24, but I did say in the prepared remarks that we have started to take orders in some markets for some products into 2024. And it seems very reasonable now. There is a bifurcation, I mean, the cash crop market in North America still seems to have nice legs to it. South America is - it's weak, and it's going to be weak, I think, until farmers decide to sell, I mean, sell the crops that they've harvested. And we're prepared for that. But overall, there's nothing that's significantly positive or significantly negative as we read out what we're seeing in the order books.

Our next question comes from the line of Tami Zakaria from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thank you so much. So given your goal to bring Factory Fit and aftermarket Precision Ag Solutions in-house to over 90%, it seems by 2026, which seems quite impressive. So from an R&D perspective, should we expect R&D spend to remain at 2023 level even if there's a downturn for the next couple of years?

We have been at an elevated R&D level for several years now, and I think what you're seeing is the fruition of those investments. We're obviously looking - we're not going to stay at that level forever. And we're looking at every single project about where we can, I think we'll probably be flattish in that area, but we've also got some product gaps that we're leaning into fill, and we've got some upgrades that we're looking to make. And we're not going to slow those down because it's so important to our future. But I don't think it's going to go. Over the last several years, you've seen it go higher from here, and I think it won't go higher from here. It'll go lower from here, but moderately.

Got it, that's very helpful. And one quick modeling question. It seems like corporate expenses ticked up in the third quarter sequentially a bit despite revenues coming in, a lot lower. Anything particular driving that?

I think there are two things here. One, sequentially as slightly lower than in the second quarter, and we expect sequentially them to be down in the third quarter - in the fourth quarter, sorry. What you probably notice is that there's a big gap to the number of last year. But last year we had some non-recurrent positive items that we didn't have, we didn't repeat this year. So that's the big gap that you may have noticed in comparison with last year. In terms of running cost. We are in the range between $60 million to $70 million per quarter. And of course, those will be also costs that would be subject to the review that we're looking at partially immediately - next year.

Got it, very helpful. Thank you.

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Daniela Costa from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking my question. I have two things left. First, I wanted to ask you, you mentioned in the release in the disclosures that you had a material issue with internal controls over financial reporting. It sounds like it is sorted, but I was wondering if you could give us some clarity of what it is and if it's really all part of past now. And then the second thing, just obviously we've seen sort of throughout the quarter, the announcement between Trimble and one of your competitors. And you used to have some sort of relationship with Trimble. Can you tell us about sort of which impacts should we see if any or if you're now, in terms of Raven product, completely independent and all sorted? That would be great. Thank you.

So let me take the first one. Daniela. You may have noticed, we had an auditor rotation at the beginning of this year, and auditor rotations are mandatory under European framework. And so we started working with the new auditor and in conjunction with them, we had a different way of looking at the, I would say, the service access that we gave to some of our employees, mainly in ICT to the system of record in particular the different SAP instances that we have. We realized, that there's different way of looking at things. The number and the scope of some of this access is out of what is typical nowadays, even considering the fact that we are a large multinational corporation. So what we're doing is we are acting very swiftly and looking at ways, first of all, of making sure that we have all the controls, but also of bringing or normalizing this situation, let's say, and we're working on that and we should have a solution in a timely manner.

So you don't expect any impacts or - anything?

No. Absolutely no. There's no impact. And it's stated on the documents and on the reps that you will see when we issue our quarterly report that this has no impact on the financial statements. Of course, the risk that we see is that having this extended access to the system, a fraud, could be perpetrated and could not be immediately seen. But again, it requires a lot of skills and it's not something that has happened or it's not something that has been identified.

Yes. And the second question as it relates to the acquisition during the quarter about Trimble and Iveco, it doesn't really affect us at all in the short term or the long term. We've got - we still today buy a lot of stuff from Trimble. They've been a great supplier and partner for a long time. They announced that they were going to go direct in the aftermarket earlier. So we've known since we acquired Raven that we would have a lot of the ability to do this stuff in-house. And as we showed on the chart, we believe that is going to continue. But we still serve our customers well with a lot of products from precision planting and we'll continue to do that. Raven continues to be a supplier to Ag Co and that will likely continue. So really there is - we compete in the market, but we also sell to each other and we don't see that necessarily changing. What is changing is just the execution of our long term strategy to have the capabilities in-house to give our customers best in class solutions with our internal products. And that's what we're in technologies, that's what we're doing.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Kristen Owen from Oppenheimer. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking the question. I wanted to come back to the conversation around pricing and Scott, I think in the prepared remarks you mentioned, price is about 3% in the quarter flat for 4Q. If we were to abstract from that, what's happening in Brazil, Latin America writ large? How is the book pricing trending and how much of those incentives are really in that Latin American region?

No, I would say incentives are across the Board and not focused on the Latin American region frankly. And those - the large good part of those are financial incentives. So retail financing, support, and also the cost of holding floor plan inventory when we deliver to our dealers. But that's mainly - that's I will say it across the board, is our global effort to sustain retail sales in the fourth quarter. And support the dealers getting there.

Okay. Thank you. So then my follow up question relates to the Milan share delisting and the announcement this morning for the $1 billion buyback, all of which will be executed, or the majority of which you've said will be executed by March 1st. Just wondering if you can talk to the appetite for further buybacks beyond that. I mean, you've discussed this 70% conversion rate and free cash flow, is still generating a lot of cash and given the headwind or - excuse me, tailwinds to margin next year, just how to think about the buyback opportunity once this transaction closes? Thank you so much.

Yes. I have to almost laugh when you - we just announced a $1 billion buyback and you're already asking for the next one. Sounds like a hedge fund question, but no, the reality is we have a lot of places to deploy capital. There are times, and I think now is right, one of them, we're trading below intrinsic value and there's a large flowback expected with the delisting that we want to lean in and we think it's the right time. And the Board was very supportive of that. As it goes out over time. I think it is just part of our capital allocation strategy. We're committed to keeping our ratings intact. We're improving them, we're committed to providing all of the R&D funding that we can, we'll can buy. If we have acquisitions that can improve the customer experience or help us grow profitably faster, we'll do that and sometimes we'll lean in more with share buybacks. And if you look over history, I would expect with a single listing in the New York Stock Exchange, we'll probably buy more than we have historically done. But I don't think you should look at the $1 billion and think there's going to be another $1 billion coming right after that. We're going to be - it's just part of our capital allocation strategy. And right now it's a rather important one.

Thank you for the time.

There are no further questions. And this concludes the conference call. Thanks for joining today. You may now disconnect your lines.