Good morning and afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to today's CNH Industrial's 2017 Full Year and Fourth Quarter Results Conference Call. For your information, today's conference call is being recorded. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Federico Donati, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, Chevon. Good morning and afternoon everyone. We would like to welcome you to the CNH Industrial 2017 full year and fourth quarter results webcast conference call. CNH Industrial Group's CEO, Rich Tobin and Max Chiara, Group CFO will host today's call. They will use the material you should have downloaded from our website, www.cnhindustrial.com. After introductory remarks, we will be available to answer the question you may have. Before moving ahead, let me just remind you that any forward-looking statement we might be making during today's call are subject to the risk and uncertainties mentioned in the Safe Harbor statement included in the presentation material. I would now turn the call over to Mr. Rich Tobin.

Thank you, Federico. Good afternoon, good morning everyone. Our full-year results were better than our upgraded guidance at the end of Q3, with demand increases in all four of our businesses leading to revenue growth of 11% at constant currency in Q4. As you could see at the bottom of the slide, we have meaningfully exceeded guidance for net industrial debt due to stronger than expected net industrial cash flow, mainly driven by working capital cash generation, as we completed our drawdown of agricultural product channel inventories in NAFTA and EMEA, and preserved production performance for 2018. As a result of this, we're projecting to be in balance between production and retail in all of our operating geographies in 2018. We continue to increase our investments in research and development and precision farming solutions partnering with leading firms to bring market solutions that will keep our Ag products at the forefront of customer choice. In terms of the balance sheet deleveraging initiatives and effective tax rate reductions, we have continued to make significant progress and now obtained recognition of these efforts by the rating agencies. I'll expand further on these points later in the presentation but for now let me say we have achieved much of what we set out to do in 2017 and we look forward to starting 2018 with good momentum. Few highlights before we move on to the overall results. We achieved a net income of $669 million in the full-year and a corresponding adjusted diluted EPS of $0.48, both up almost 40% compared to last year. This was accomplished due to solid performance across the segments and increased activity levels resulting in operating profit of $1.5 billion and 5.8% margin. In addition, we started to unlock value below the operating profit a result of the…

Thank you, Rich, and good morning, good afternoon everyone. I'm on Slide 5 with full-year 2017 financial highlights. During the year we achieved industrial net sales of $26.2 billion, with an increase of 8.6% at constant currency versus last year with solid contributions from all segments. That translated into an operating margin of 5.8%, up 30 basis points versus last year with positive performance in agricultural equipment, construction, and powertrain. Adjusted net income was up almost 40% year-over-year or $187 million, with an adjusted diluted EPS of $0.48 per share. As in addition to our improved operating performance, we continue to pull-through benefits in our interest expense as well as our adjusted effective tax rate. As a reminder, you can find a reconciliation from net income to adjusted net income in the Appendix of the presentation. At a high level, for the year, we booked a pre-tax of restructuring charge of $93 million in relation to our efficiency program coming primarily from previous quarters. In Q4, we also booked, as preannounced in our press release of January 25, non-cash pre and after-tax charge of $92 million due to deconsolidation of CNH Industrial Venezuelan operations effective December 31, 2017. Our non-cash tax charge of $123 million due to the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, and Tax legislation changes in the UK, and certain other countries, enacted during the month of December of 2017, as well as a total pre-tax charge of $64 million related to the repurchase and early redemption of notes completed in the course of 2017, as we accelerate on our call and expense strategy to profit from the investment grade rating to reduce our cost of debt. In terms of our debt, net industrial debt was $0.9 billion at year-end a 45% reduction when compared to the…

Okay, thank you, Max. Agricultural net sales increased 10% for the full-year 2017 compared to 2016. At LATAM we had a very good result; the increase was mainly due to higher industry volume, market share gains, and a favorable mix of higher horsepower products and net price realization. Net sales increased in APAC mainly driven by favorable volume in Australia, Russia, and Southeast Asia. In EMEA, net sales increased due to higher industry volume, favorable product mix, and net price realization. And in NAFTA, net sales decreased as a result of destocking actions in the dealer network primarily with high horsepower tractors and hay and forage product line. NAFTA industry volumes were flat overall with row crop sector higher offset by lower livestock volumes. Full-year 2017 operating profit was $949 million, a 16% increase compared to 2016 mainly due to favorable volume and product mix in all regions except NAFTA, 1% net price realization more than offset increases in raw material and unfavorable foreign exchange fluctuations. We incurred a material amount of increased production cost in Q4 as a result of the transition of our European product offering to the new tractor mother regulation safety standards negatively impacting incremental margins in the quarter. We consider these cost transitory with no meaningful carry-forward into 2018. Agricultural equipment also increased spending in R&D primarily related to our new precision farming solutions and in SG&A. SG&A expenses still remain more than 20% lower than peak, operating margin increased to 8.5%. In terms of unit stats, we overproduced tractors on a global basis and combines compared to retail sales of the year but continued to underproduce in NAFTA despite the upturn in the market. As discussed, we have ample capacity headroom to meet projected demand into 2018. Considering the channel inventory stats and development…

Thank you, Mr. Tobin. Now we’re ready to start the Q&A session. Chevon, please take the first one.

[Operator Instructions]. We will take our first question from Rob Wertheimer from Melius. Please go ahead.

Thank you and good morning everybody or whichever. Rich, I wonder if you could talk about R&D for a minute, you called out a little bit of stepped up R&D expense in a couple of divisions, you mentioned Precision Ag is there any shift in your philosophy towards what you need to spend on technology. If you don't mind I mean can you tell us as much you can on what you think your strategy for Precision Ag needs to be whether it's more hardware or software, more partners, more implements, I mean just like a little bit of an update there if you wouldn't mind?

Okay, Rob, good to hear from you again.

Fine. Thank you.

Look it's the fastest growing segment, it’s the fastest growing segment of our R&D spend within Ag. The vast majority of the spend is internal to either the tractor or the combine. We're generally pursuing a partnership strategy for kind of data transmission and kind of the balance of precision farming. So if you think about it this way, we’re spending our money on is in order for our equipment to be able to execute menus if you will and be able to transmit Telematics data to both ourselves, our dealers, and our customers. So I think you're going to get quite a bit a lot of news flow in this area during 2018 in terms of our partnership programs and our philosophy, but it is the fastest growing portion other than preparations for Stage 5 engine or driveline introduction in 2018 and 2019.

That's great, thank you. And then if I may I mean construction is finally getting healthy in a bunch of markets hopefully pricing has firmed up a little bit. Kind of had some easy comps but maybe had better pricing in 2017? What are your thoughts on you mentioned pricing was a little bit tough here and there I mean does that feel like a market that's generally improving, has volume surprised the upside and capacity gets tight and you can really have a chance to make your target margins in the near future?

Yes, I mean, look, I mean if you look at the net price realization in Q4 of this past year that's the highest number that I can remember in three years. So I think that overall industry inventory levels are in balance with demand. And I think that pricing discipline is taking hold. I think that we had a pretty choppy year in 2016 in terms of price realization. I'm talking about kind of NAFTA or the industry as a whole. 2017 because demand has picked up, pricing discipline has improved, so our expectation is what you see in Q4 in terms of price realization carries throughout 2018.

And we will now take our next question from Mike Shlisky from Seaport Global. Please go ahead.

Hello guys. I want to start out with maybe the CV margin cadence here, it sounds like you had a tough quarter does the Stralis X-WAY product that you put out in the fourth quarter, has that gone well so far for orders for 2018, does the mix get better throughout the year or do we kind of put out a challenge and end up at a kind of much better point or is it going to be challenged for the majority of 2018? Any kind of thoughts as we cadence there, I'd appreciate it.

The Stralis X-WAY is because it's more of a body builder product, is going to take a little while to get started when we are taking orders from it now, but we've just started, but we're betting on the improvement of mix from that particular product line. I mean when I mentioned before taking a hard look at price realization through model mix, it's to deemphasize articulated tractor volume in 2018 go to more rigid and gas vehicles. But I think if you look overall year-over-year, we did have a significant headwind in terms of translation impact of the GBP which we don't expect to repeat into next year. So I mean you can model it yourself but our expectation is if you put a 1% price net realization on these numbers year-over-year, you get a material impact in terms of the change. So, yes, I think we had we had a difficult year, I mentioned at the end of Q3, if we couldn't turn it around in terms of price realization that we'd have to address model mix and we've been preparing through the quarter to do just that.

Got it. Great. Secondly I want to ask about the New Mother Regulation that was the headwind, it sounds like for margins in Q4 for Ag. Is there way you can first of all quantify that and maybe comment on is there a way to having a very stern product across Europe has some scale benefits for you for 2018 going forward or is it not much of an impact there?

It's a material amount, I don't think I'll call it out in terms of the amount, but if you look at some of the -- if you look at the product cost line and that would give you a kind of an idea. Look at the end of the day; we had a choice whether to get all this TMR behind us in 2017 or to carry it forward by registering pre-TMR vehicles. In Q4, we chose not to do so. So and we took the pain to a certain extent in Q4 and that's been a pretty large headwind in terms of incremental margins. But as I mentioned in my comments, we believe that's transitory, it's done and everything that we're shipping out of our plants -- everything that we shipped out of our plants at the end of Q4 and that we're shipping out of our plants now are 100% compliant with TMR regulation. So I would expect and what we're -- we're looking at incremental margins for 2018 to be significantly improved over Ag despite not calling a significant increase on the top-line.

Sure, thanks. But as far as having a more standardized product out the door everyday in your Ag facilities in Europe, does that helps you at all for some additional scale or does it not matter much versus the 2017 models?

I mean the TMR was a question of getting in compliance. I mean so you had to make a significant amount of changes to your -- to the vehicle themselves and the software. But so at the end of the day, you had to take the cost to make the transition. But the scale benefits that we had before will carry into next year, it's purely a question of it was significant upset in terms of at the manufacturing base making that transition which we will not carry-forward into next year.

And we will take our next question from Steven Fisher from UBS. Please go ahead.

Thanks. I wonder if I could just get a clarification first, what tax rate and share count you assume in your EPS guidance for 2018?

The tax rate. What do we have in the press release?

30% to 32%

30% to 32% and the share count unchanged. So we don't factor in the buyback.

Okay. Right. Got it. And then could you help us bridge the net industrial debt year-over-year between 2017 and 2018 what the major components are you going to be there to get flat year-over-year?

Look largely at the end of the day, the significant liquidation of inventory that where we took the under absorption this year. As I mentioned before we're going to probably, we are likely to produce in line with retail demand. So there is going to be a ramp up of working capital to support those sales. You have a little bit of valuation because of the increase of the Euro against the Dollar would be the other portion of it and the increase in the dividend.

Okay. And then just maybe last if you could just give a little more detail on your construction industry forecast, if your order book is a good indication, I would have thought that your forecast would show a little more growth, I think you said NAFTA might be a little conservative but what's holding you back at this point?

Nothing really, like I said, I mean we take our own forecasts and then we look at industry forecasts to make sure that we're not out of line. Our forecasts right now are in line with the balance of industry participants. As I mentioned in the comments, based on our order book right now, if we're a proxy for construction equipment which based on our size, we're really not, we would expect the market at least the NAFTA to perform better than we've indicated in terms of unit volume but we'll see really at the end of Q1.

And we will take our next question from Ann Duignan from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead.

Good morning or good afternoon. This is Tom Simonitsch on behalf of Ann. Firstly, if you could provide some more color on your expectations for EMEA Ag equipment demand by country and by site in 2018, and in particular, what is your basic assumption for the health of the EU dairy sector?

I won't give you a country-by-country estimate because at the end of the day what we're projecting for EMEA is flat to up 5%. So there's no particular market that’s accelerating exponentially. So it's a general comment that we believe total demand should be within that range. Well we would expect that the one market that has severely underperformed in 2017 was France. So France would contribute in 2018 probably over proportionally to that demand. In terms of the dairy market in total, I mean, it's almost of this question comes every year, every year the market is projected to be down every year the market is projected to come under pressure in terms of earnings, and we never seem to see it. So we don't expect in our forecast that the dairy market is going to come under pressure, it's just going to be more of the same if you will.

Okay, thank you. And then, likewise, for your Ag equipment market outlook in LATAM, what are your expectations for Brazil in 2018?

It's exactly what it says there. I think that what we would add in terms of the color on Brazil it’s probably going to have a bad comp in the first half of the year because of the accelerate because of the volume that was shipped. If you take a look at Brazilian consumption in 2017, it was very much frontend loaded into Q1, Q2, and then blood down over the balance of the year. So would expect to see some bad comps in Q1 and Q2 but overall we expect the market to be up.

And we will take our next question from Joe O'Dea from Vertical Research. Please go ahead.

Hi good morning. Richard, I think you mentioned some good incrementals in the Ag segment in 2018, just overall for industrial Ag margins could you give us a sense of roughly what you're looking for within the guidance that you provided?

In the 20s.

20s on the incrementals and then what would that translate to I guess in terms of an actual op margin, we don't have color on some of the non-operating items and so it wasn't clear from the 5.8% in 2017?

Yes, I mean, Joe, you are specifically asking about Ag or industrial in total?

I'm sorry. I'm asking about total industrial when you compare to the 5.8% in 2017.

Yes I got it. In total industrial, you're looking more in the teens in terms of incremental margin.

Got it.

And then full-year margin you would have some accretion because the teens are higher than the book margin right now. Without getting into granularly chopping it up into pieces, so we're looking at in consolidated industrial we're looking in teens in terms of incremental margins I mentioned before we're looking for 20s because we said that repeatedly on the Ag side. But then in full so if you are getting teens in incrementals you're going to get accretive margins year-over-year.

And if kind of FX stands where it is, we won't expect the profit to change and so that's going to be margin negative profit neutral.

It’s very difficult to predict but at the end of the day if FX does not move from here and we have very good hedge effectiveness, then we're not -- we're going to get top-line growth in translation and slight negative in terms of income -- in terms of operating margin because of the fact that you're getting the translation benefit at top-line and you're not getting that same proportion in translation benefit and operating earnings because we're long Euro in terms of our cost base. But overall total profits we don't expect to change much and we'd expect revenue to be up higher than our guidance because our guidance was projecting a €1.15 to the dollar. So the upper end of the revenue with really unchanging operating margin or operating profit.

That's helpful. And then on North America high horsepower when you look at large tractors 17% under production in 2017 talking about aligning production with retail, could you just kind of talk about the cadence of that I mean were you doing some of that in the fourth quarter at all or as you think about 2018 and that could mean 20-percent-plus kind of increase in build rates when we should see that starting to happen?

You didn't see any of it in Q4. Okay, so what we did was increased production in combines but we had been doing that all year because the market in 2017 was up 10%. In high horsepower tractors we continued to underproduce in NAFTA in 2017 and despite us calling the market up we held back that production in Q4 to bring it into 2018 and that's why as a global comment we believe, we should be in balance between production and retail. I expect that would be back-end loaded in 2018. We won't come out of the gate in 2017 overproducing retail significantly. We're running at still at some pretty low capacity utilization levels, so we've got the industrial capacity to catch-up. So I'd expect that would be back-end loaded but that would be a big contributor to the incremental margins of the 20s that we're expecting in Ag on the full-year.

And we’ll take our next question from David Raso from Evercore. Please go ahead.

Hi, thank you. Can you provide us your free cash flow guidance 2018?

Our free cash flow guidance.

Well, I'm trying to reconcile no share repos in the guidance and there is no change in industrial debt. That's what we're trying to get at.

Right. And well I think to what we're saying is we're calling revenues up, right. We had we over -- we over delivered arguably in terms of working capital this year. If we're calling, we're basically saying that we're going to call it, we're calling the market up there we're going to have to build some working capital to support that and then we've got a piece of FX and the increase in dividend in there. So overall we should be slightly negative in working capital year-over-year.

Yes. I guess the revenue guide doesn't seem to be that strong at first blush, to chew up that much working capital. And then when I think about the year-over-year change for example on the inventory I mean your inventory actually went up year-over-year as a company, your inventory went down 3Q to 4Q actually less than it went down 3Q to 4Q the last three years. So I'm just trying to reconcile does that much working capital increase needed for really not that large a revenue increase I'm just trying to make sure we understand the cash flow numbers.

Yes, we got $300 million baked in working capital change, negative.

Maybe the dividends $250 million at most, right, so if you have $300 million the CapEx is a $100 million right, so $250 million for the dividend, $100 million for the CapEx, $120 million for the CapEx. You just had what $300 million, $350 million for the working capital. I mean there still should be hundreds of millions leftover unless the free -- the other components of free cash flow you expect to be lower, I'm just making sure we understand the core conversion here.

And you have the translation impact on euro-dollar right outside of free cash.

So that's like the plug right now on those numbers.

That's correct.

And we'll take our next question from Larry De Maria from William Blair. Please go ahead.

Hey, thanks. Good morning, Rich. Two questions. First, I'm sorry if you mentioned this but what do we need to see in order for you guys start executing on the buyback plans at this point?

Well we have to get the authorization done which will get done at the AGM which is the 13th of March -- of April, excuse me. But we have the open plan now. So we've got the opportunity to do it on the 300 that's open but if we're talking about the increase to 700, we need to get the post AGM.

Should you get it post AGM then there's nothing to think that you wouldn't start executing on it because obviously you've had the other one in place for a while, right?

Yes, I mean, yes, that would be correct.

Okay, thanks. And then secondly construction this point obviously it's kind of a subscale business but if the outlook is getting better and with a better point in the cycle, now you have a debt grade, upgrade, and tax reform is kind of played out. Just curious have you changed your thoughts on how to strategically improve the business which is obviously subscale do we invest in it or divest in it or how do you think you strategically back construction at this point given that you may have some better options with it now.

Yes, I look I think that I wouldn't consider what we would do with construction equipment anything really to do with the balance sheet because of its size. Look we believe that this is a business that we should be able to get to acceptable margins and return on invested capital we're actually planning for a significant increase in its profitability in 2018 largely driven by NAFTA performance and to a certain extent EMEA. If we get any return to maybe half of the market that we had in Brazil in the past and then this is a business that's going to deliver a positive return on invested capital. So that's the way we look at. I think this is 2018 a year when we think that we're going to get some positive momentum in earnings as long as the market in terms of pricing discipline holds up. But I don't think it's an issue of we've got our cap -- we got our capital structure fixed so let's go do something with construction equipment.

We'll take our next question from Ross Gilardi from Bank of America. Please go ahead.

Rich, I just wanted to ask again about NAFTA large Ag in 2017, so you underproduced think retail and high horsepower tractors by 17% in 2017, and now you're talking about producing in line with retail in 2018. So are you -- you're essentially implying production growth, north of 20% in 2018 in NAFTA high horsepower tractors? Am I understanding those comments correctly.

I think that the channel inventory is down 17%. I'm going to take a look at the number here. But I think that what we're saying is that we're going to produce in line with retail but I wouldn't take a look at total change in channel inventory because which is a combination of company inventory and dealer inventory. I think that the number is more an increase of somewhere between 10% and 12% year-over-year in high horsepower segment.

I'm just looking at one of your slide that shows the retail sales versus production by quarter in both tractors and combines and in there you have a comment that says NAFTA 140 plus four wheel drive underproduction versus retail at 17%. I think that’s the 2017 comment. So if you just index the numbers and you looked at what you're saying about 2018 producing at retail it would seem to imply you're talking about 20-percent-plus production growth in high horsepower tractors? No.

Yes. I look to a certain extent, yes. But I can tell you right now that based on the number when we give you the guidance in terms of the tractors, right, it's all tractors, right. We don't give you specific guidance on the high horsepower segment. From what I know that the increase in the high horsepower segment of tractors year-over-year is in the teens year-over-year.

Okay. Got it.

And that's take into the incremental margin because of we're not going to be running the negative absorption that we've been running since 2014.

And did you have underproduction in the other -- in outside of North America in Ag in 2017 or was it just NAFTA?

It was NAFTA and then it would have been a significant underproduction in Q4 in EMEA.

Okay, got it. And then can just talk a little bit about of echo strategically obviously there's been a lot of speculation on what you guys may or may not do with it but can you just give us a general sense as to how you're even thinking about whether it stays in the portfolio or not? And what metrics do you look at? I mean, I think at one point you wanted to get to a 6%, back to 6% margin, you've kind of been stucked around 3% for the last several years. And arguably we're at more peakest type market in Europe overall. So how do you determine whether or not you keep it or divest it and just any thoughts there would be helpful?

Yes, I’m not going to get into the speculative issue about divesting it. I mean the fact of the matter is from an execution point of view, it was not a good year for us. We had expected to have an improvement in terms of model mix and net price realization and the honest answer is we didn’t execute. So if we had executed the way that we would have planned, we would have been within the range of the margins that we had targeted for this business. And I don’t believe this business is incapable of doing it. And I think it's -- I mean we own this one in terms of its execution and I don’t think that we would be thinking about doing anything different with the business until we get it to where we want it in terms of its profitability.

Okay, thanks. And then just lastly just interest expense Max, could you help us somewhat you're embedding in your EPS outlook for interest in 2018 versus 2017?

We are assuming $55 million of reduced expenses in 2018 versus 2017.

$55 million, okay. Thank you.

And our final question comes from Nicole DeBlase from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead.

Yes, thanks, good afternoon guys. I guess a lot have been asked here but I guess thinking about the CV business piggybacking on the back of Ross's question, you talked about how you need to drive the execution in that business. What -- do you think you can get the year-on-year improvement in CV in 2018 and maybe what's the right way to think about incremental margins in that business this year?

Yes, our expectation is to improve the performance of 2017 where I think it was pretty clear that from an execution point of view we just didn’t deliver. The incremental margins there would be in the teens or the high-teens if we execute appropriately.

Okay, thanks. That's helpful. And then you mentioned before the potential for very significant incrementals in construction equipment in 2018 especially since the mix is shifting towards NAFTA, what does significant mean, is that like 20% as well?

Close to it, high-teens to low 20s.

Okay, got it. Thanks. I will pass it on.

Okay Nicole.

That will conclude the question-and-answer session. I would now like to turn the call back over to Federico Donati for any additional or closing remarks.

Thank you, Chevon. We would like to thank everyone for attending today’s call with us. Have a good day.

That will conclude today’s conference call. Thank you for your participation. Ladies and gentlemen, you may now disconnect.