Good day, everyone, and welcome to the Conduent First Quarter 2019 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please also note, today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Alan Katz, Vice President of Investor Relations. Sir, please go ahead.

Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Conduent's first quarter 2019 earnings call. Joining me on today's call is Ashok Vemuri, Conduent's CEO; and Brian Walsh, Conduent CFO. Following our prepared remarks, we will take your questions. This call is also being webcast. A copy of the slides used during this call was filed with the SEC this afternoon. These slides as well as the detailed financial metrics sheet are available for download on the Investor Relations section of the Conduent website. We will also post the transcript later this week. During this call, Conduent executives may make comments that contain certain forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that by their nature address matters that are in the future and are uncertain. These statements reflect management's current beliefs, assumptions and expectations as of today, May 8, 2019, and are subject to a number of factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those statements. Information concerning these factors is included in Conduent's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. We do not intend to update these forward-looking statements as a result of new information or future events or developments except as required by law. The information presented today includes non-GAAP financial measures. Because these measures are not calculated in accordance with US GAAP, they should be viewed in addition to and not as a substitute for the company's reported results prepared in accordance with US GAAP. For more information regarding definitions of our non-GAAP measures and how we use them, as well as limitations as to their usefulness for comparative purposes, please see our press release, which was issued this afternoon and was furnished to the SEC on Form 8-K. With that, I will turn the call over to Ashok for his prepared remarks. Ashok?

Thank you, Alan, and good evening, everyone. Before we get into the earnings discussion, I want to comment on the announcement we made regarding the leadership transition. As many of you would have seen we announced that I intend to step down as CEO and as a member of the Board of Directors once a CEO successor has been made. I'm committed to an orderly transition and will continue in my current role until a successor is appointed, which the Board expects to occur during the third quarter of 2019. It has been my privilege to lead as the first CEO of Conduent. We have made enormous progress, standing up a public company, driving a significant transformation program in a relatively short period of time, laying the foundation to become a digital interactions company and resolving the legacy issues we had. I am proud of these achievements. As Conduent enters its next phase and continues to pivot to growth this is the right time to begin the transition to the next CEO. It is an honor to lead the best team in the industry. I want to thank the Board and all Conduent employees for their support during these transformative changes. They will continue to be the driver of the company's success going forward. I will continues to work with them and the Board during this period to ensure a seamless transition . In terms of the first quarter, results came in below our expectations primarily due to an unanticipated and sudden in-quarter volume drop from one of our larger client and lower than anticipated new business timings and revenue conversion. This lower revenue in turn impacted adjusted EBITDA. However, this was partially offset by continued productivity improvements, automation and Accu-shoring allowing us to achieve year-over-year margin expansion in the…

Thank you, Ashok. I'll start off going through financials and we'll conclude with some thoughts on our market positioning and opportunities for the future. Throughout this presentation and in the exhibits in the appendix we will provide both GAAP and adjusted numbers, which provide a clean compare by removing the impact of the divestitures that we completed in 2018 and this past quarter. Now let's start on Slide 3 with an overview of the first quarter financial results. I won't go through the walk of the full P&L, but we will instead focus on a few key line items. Revenue was approximately $1.16 billion for the quarter as reported or $1.12 billion after adjusting for the divestiture of a select portfolio of customer care contracts down 4.3% year-over-year. On a constant currency basis, revenue was down 3.5% year-over-year, primarily driven by the run-off business we lost in prior quarters and strategic decisions, partially offset by the ramp of new business. SG&A continued to improve year-over-year, driven by our cost savings initiatives, as well as trend in our sales force. When excluding the impact of divestitures, adjusted EBITDA in the quarter increased 1.7% year-over-year to $122 million with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 10.9% or 70 basis point improvement. While revenue pressure led to adjusted EBITDA being lower than expectations, we made progress on our transformation program and as a result continue to show margin improvement. Given the timing of addressing stranded costs, our adjusted EBITDA margin profile is expected to be up meaningfully in the back half of the year. Our pre-tax loss in the first quarter was $338 million, driven primarily by a goodwill impairment. As I'll discuss in a few slides, we have lowered our outlook for the full-year and as a result, evaluated the goodwill and carrying…

[Operator Instructions] And our first question today comes from Shannon Cross from Cross Research. Please go ahead with your question.

Ashok, I'm not sure how many of these you can or will answer, but I thought I'd throw out some of the most obvious ones here. Can you give us more background on what precipitated your leaving? Specifically was there more disconnect with the Board beyond what was sort of laid out in Mike Nevin’s letter? How are you going to be sort of working and operating Conduent since you're going to be leaving as soon as the next guy comes in or a woman comes in? And what should we think about the potential for the company to be up for sale at this point? Thank you.

As we have been detailing over the last two years Conduent has made significant progress since the separation by becoming a public company, driving transformation, laying the foundation to become a digital interactions company as well as to a great extent resolving the legacy issues that we inherited. So clearly the foundation has been built. We've built a strong team. The depth and width of the markets we operate in and our loyal client base built on the strong foundation gives us the opportunity to leverage more business from the market. So, I feel confident that the foundation is here, the strategy is in place. The strategy was approved by the Board last year and continues to be the strategy that we will follow. There is clearly an opportunity to pivot to growth and as we enter the next phase of transformation the Board and I both thought that it was a good time to bring in new leadership – new leader and for the CEO transition to become effective. I clearly believe in the strategy. I clearly believe in my management team and the opportunities that are available for the company. And I will assist in the transition in order to keep it as seamless as possible for my clients, for my employees and definitely for my management team as well as he or she who succeed me as a CEO.

Our next question comes from Bryan Bergin from Cowen. Please go ahead with your question.

I wanted to follow here on bookings. Just can you talk about what really changed quarter-to-quarter, particularly around the new business signings? Are there particular segments that we're showing outsized weakness and can you comment, why do you think this is more a function of sales force productivity, the offering or anything macro related that you can point to?

Sure, so we had lower signings, pipeline conversion in Q1 and we had some large deals that fell out of the forecast. In one case, a large deal based on some M&A that one of our clients is involved in. In other cases, it was other delays and that transpired late in the quarter. In addition, in my prepared remarks, I mentioned, we had some sales force churn. So we're very focused on building up the sales force and keeping it stable, but we did have some churn in Q1. As we pivot to platform and digital solutions it's taking longer to convert the pipeline and some of our legacy issues that have been out in the press, have also been causing some delays in a couple of cases. But we believe we're focused on all the right things to turn this around. We're focused on converting the new business pipeline, stabilizing and investing in the sales force. We're continuing all our investments in our technology platforms and infrastructure. We are streamlining our go-to-market and operating model, including consolidating commercial under one leader, which gives us consistent sales process across commercial. And we're executing on our strategic accretive acquisitions, such as HSP, which we closed in the first quarter. So we're confident this will lead to signings growth over time. But obviously in the first quarter we declined and we're focused on turning that around. And I would say in terms of a couple areas that are under more pressure, I would say government and transportation were under more pressure in Q1 than commercial.

Can you clarify what your expectation is now for bookings for 2019 year-on-year?

We're focused on driving new business signings growth as we've consistently said to drive top line organic growth. We need double-digit new business signings on a consistent basis. That's what we're driving for, but obviously in Q1, we didn't see that. I mean, Q2 we'll see how we perform. We're very focused; this is our number one priority is to convert the pipeline and to get new business signings moving in the right direction.

And then I have a follow-up here on cost takeout you mentioned additional actions being taken. Can you just detail how you're balancing those cuts to make up for the revenue shortfall versus the investments that are required to turn the business around to growth? And then how should we be thinking about the margin levels as you walk through 2019?

Yes, so we, when we saw in March the visibility to some of the revenue challenges, we decided to take incremental cost actions one around suspending 401-K match for a subset of our employees. Two, we reduced our salary increase budget for the year and three, we took some incremental headcount actions to make sure we're still focused on improving the EBITDA margin for the company. As you look at the guidance for the year, we've guiding at 12% to 13% EBITDA margin. That's a pretty wide range and we're doing that, so we can balance, making the right investments and improving profitability as we focused on turning around the top line. And so that will be the focus. We're also executing the stranded cost takeout. We took actions in Q2 that will benefit us over the next few quarters and then by the end of the year we expect to get all the stranded costs out, so that's a focus. If you look at CapEx you can also see CapEx was high in Q1 as we make investments in our technology and so we're maintaining investments and balancing cost with cost takeout, with investments, so we can turn that top line around.

Yes, Brian, this is Alan, in terms of timing and the quarterly impact, I would just note that the stranded cost, a lot of the action will benefit the back half of the year, so the year-over-year improvement really picked up in the back half of the year as a result of those stranded costs coming out.

Your next question comes from Puneet Jain from JPMorgan. Please go with your question.

Ashok, could you share your thoughts on Conduent's current portfolio of business. Why it makes sense to provide services to both commercial as well as government clients and if there are any assets that could be monetized to unlock shareholder value?

Yes. Puneet so clearly, I believe that on both the transportation and the government business that we do in the public sector as well as on the commercial side, there are significant synergies that can be exploited and leveraged. If you look at our HSV acquisition that is a classic case of capability that can be deployed on a technology platform on both the commercial as well as on the government healthcare side. And we have similar examples in transportation, where we are increasingly talking about public-private partnership. We're talking about partnership for urban mobility et cetera. So I do really believe that the fact that we cover such a diverse market gives us the opportunity to cross and upsell and bundle our various capabilities for better efficiency, for better price realization and for a better competitive advantage. When we last had said in 2018 that we were bringing our divestitures program to an end, clearly, those were the assets that we believe did not really fit into the broader stable of assets that we have. We're obviously from a shareholder return perspective, we always look and explore every and any and every opportunity that's going to enhance that value.

Our next question comes from my Mayank Tandon from Needham & Company. Please go with your question.

Brian, you did give us the insights into the guidance update. But could you provide a walk through from the 0.5% to 1.5% growth that you were targeting previously for 2019 and now down to negative 3% to negative 4%. How much of that is organic? What are the inorganic contribution FX impacts, et cetera?

Yes. So first, the guidance that we provided on the Q4 call and now is at constant currency. So there is no currency impact and we also on the Q4 call we provided guidance we removed any incremental acquisitions. So this is all inorganic change and it's really driven by two items, one we saw pressure, volumes from one of our larger commercial clients which was sudden and unexpected in February and March. We're working with the clients, we address the volume volatility, but this could impact other quarters. So we reflected that potential volatility in the updated guidance and second, the new business signings were down 39% in Q1 and again in order to drive organic growth we really need double-digit new business signings growth consistently and so it's really those two items that have led to the guidance change.

And then if I can just tack on a question about the revenue trajectory, could you comment on one, why the large client decided to reduce volumes maybe some insights into what is going on with the client? And also, you referenced in your deck that there was lost business on the government side, as well is that the California contract you were referencing or is there another contract that is also impacting the government side of the business?

Yes. So in my prepared remarks I talked about the California on the last contract where we were notified in 2018 that we were not -- we did not win the renewal. I mean we are protesting that decision and in Q1, we decided not to protest it further. So that contract currently goes to the end of September. We believe we may get an extension to the end of the year, but we're not sure yet. Once we know the exact timing of when that contract will end, we will reflect that loss in our renewal rate. It's approximately $140 million in revenue, but it's very low EBITDA margins. We don't expect much of a profit impacts.

And then any insight into why the large client decided to reduced volumes with you and maybe if you could comment on what type of business you were providing to that clients?

So it's end-user support in our commercial business and we are working proactively with the client to try to address the volume issue. I mean, it wasn't a decision to take volume away, it's volume variability that they're experiencing.

Our next question comes from Brian Essex from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead with your question.

Brian, I was wondering, if I just talked about, if you can just address the renewals for a little bit. It looks like just quick math renewals account for about 82% of your revenue run rate at the end of the year. So, most of it relying on renewals. Could you maybe address -- I understand this is 92% renewal rate, but how that -- does that account for renewals as a percentage of original par value? And maybe if you could just address like how pricing on renewals is working out and how we should think about the support that has behind your revenue expectations for fiscal 2019 and then I have a quick follow-up.

So the renewal rate is basically decisions made in the quarter. What did we win, and what do we lose and it's calculated based on the deals we're chasing. So if there is a price down in that deal, it's not reflected in the renewal rate. Last year pricing was fairly consistent. We had some price increases and some price decreases that for the most part offset each other. This year we have one government price decrease that was pretty large that isn't being entirely offset. Other than that the pricing commentary that we provided last year is consistent with what we’re expecting this year.

And then maybe just if we can touch real quick on the capital structure. How does the M&A pipeline looks? Do you still maintain the same capital structure, just looking at where the stock price is kind of aftermarket here maybe would you change your posture on repurchasing shares and essentially just want to understand, are there any changes in place where you have the same profile priorities and might you be more aggressive on the M&A side to kind of reinvigorate growth here?

So the Board along with us, we can continuously look at the capital structure. So far, up to this point, our priorities have been investing into the business to drive organic growth and doing strategic tuck-in M&A to strengthen our offerings and our view is that that should still be the focus but we're obviously always looking at it and open to driving what makes sense for shareholder value. What makes the most sense for shareholder value. And we continue to have a strong pipeline that we're working and obviously some multiples are high and we're staying disciplined. I mean we're pleased with the first acquisition that we closed in January. It's already making an impact to our pipeline and we believe it's strengthening our offerings as Ashok mentioned both in commercial healthcare and government healthcare. So we want to do more transactions that look like HSP.

And ladies and gentlemen with that we reached the end of today's question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the conference call back over to Ashok Vemuri for any closing remarks.

Thank you. As I have reiterated before, we believe that Conduent as it enters its next phase and continues to pivot the growth, this is the right time to begin the transition to the next CEO. I am committed to an orderly transition. I will continue in my current role until a successor is appointed. The Board is engaged and committed, and we have a sound strategy. And we believe that we have the right management team and as well as our loyal client base that will allow us to realize this next transformation to pivot to growth. With that, thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, that will conclude today's conference call. We do thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines.