So yes, $3 million down for the $8 million project we raised funding for that – from Stanbic in Zimbabwe and so it really don’t comes down to making sure the foreign exchange is available from Zimbabwe to – from the purchase of that. But that should underpin a recovery in [indiscernible] In addition, the oxygen some remaining it no longer me to use liquid oxygen which we currently importing and this is significant, this side as well as sort of an improved recovery in a savings for that. So that’s production widely on Page 7 of the presentation, there is a limit bit of information about production costs. Labor was down on the quarter, compared to the comparable quarter. And that’s notwithstanding of 2.9% across the board pay rise, which back dated to the 1 of January this year and also we’re employing quite a few more people, 5% more people than we’re in quarter two compared to the previous the comparable quarter in 2017, but notwithstanding by the few factors, the overall labor charge has come down because given – the type of performance of the production is not quite well as expected to be. So in first half, there is no production bonus that explains why the labor is down. Consumables are up quite a bit. We had indicated that the increased use – increased production coming from the declines I think about 25% of overall production that comes in declines of others. Moves it we are making much greater use of a business equipment that we haven't previously – sorry, intensively of the market, but an increased maintenance and sort of consumable costs that are only temporary. So when the Central Shaft is completed, we go back to our traditional mining methodology, which won't include the use of these industry machines, that’s relevant, that again, as a short term phenomenon. What we have seen in the quarter is significant increase in explosives price and also in the quarter, there was about $280,000 of a consumable cost associated with the pilot plant, which was running in the quarter to tax fleet material from some other satellite properties that are currently no longer operational. So again on the whole, we're reasonably comfortable but on-mine cost remaining pretty well contained and increases, we understand why those increases are happening and its relatively short-term, as we increase production and revert back to our memorable mining methodology. We do expect there is on-mine costs and also the all-in sustaining cost for again quite significantly. I really want to get on to the working capital. But before I get there, I think other thing is notice is taxation. The few bit of information on Page 9. The effective tax charge in the quarter was quite a bit lower than the comparable quarter. It's come down from 52%, but when I really – when I’m look at the tax rate high, I’m going to amalgamate the income tax rate and deferred tax rate that's come down and also the total effective tax rate, which includes withholding tax that come down. Before you get to excited that the benefits from the reduction and withholding tax is only short-term. We do need to have some sort of mechanism, both Caledonia in South Africa to charge on the Blanket for the services that’s a very considerable services that we provide from South Africa to the mine. The difficulty we have is that the transfer pricing regulations that exist between Zimbabwe and South Africa are a very complex and be mutually compatible. And so the difficulty, we're going to have is about over and above commercial requirements to make sure the cash is growing from Blanket to Caledonia to cover costs that we incur here in South Africa. We are going to end up in a situation, where there will be some tax leakage arising in either South Africa and/or Zimbabwe and we just happened to find a way to minimizes that. And I have say that by failing to make any transfer pricing arrangements tool would cause a serious problem in one or other jurisdictions. So don't get too excited about the fact that withholding taxes, which much lower in the quarter. And I afraid it will come back later on in the year. But really significant from the effect of the cash in the quarter was working capital and if you look at Page 11 of the result presentation. On Page 11, it shows the quarterly cash flow going back quarter one 2017. We start with EBITDA and then hands on although which full intensive purposes will be export credit incentive, which we should get paid in cash and that gives you the operating cash flow before working capital. And you can see that on a quarterly basis, it was $5.7 million in the first quarter of 2017, just last a $5 million in the second quarter of 2017. Quarter three and four in 2017 with very good productive quarters and slow we’re generating $7.2 million and $8.9 million respectively. Just on the $7 million in quarter one, the quarter two – the quarter just finished in 2018 was $6.3 million. So I don’t want cutting – I don’t want people to look at the cash movement in the quarter and drove the conclusion that the underlying cash generating capacity of the business has been adversely effected that by naming the case. We’re still generating over $6 million on a relatively disappointing and falling on the gold price environment. What did cause the damage was working capital movement, which you can see in the quarter was a $5.5 million outflow and that's after four or five quarters of consistent inflow, some of which have quite consistent. One of the couple of was that, it was a few factors behind that working capital outflow. The first is that the stock has continued to increase and management needs to take some steps to stop the quarterly increase in stock levels. The second thing is that the amount the government owns ours – so government owns us primarily for VAT recoverables and so to a lesser extent to go deliveries and for the export incentive credit that’s gone up by $2.6 million. In part a good proportion that was good genuine timing issues, so the increase in the gold bullion sale receivable, and in export credit payment those reversed immediately after the end of the quarter, so I’m not at all concerned about that. What is the quarter rotation is the constant increasing VAT recoverable, and we’re taking – taking measures now to try and recoup some of that recoverable in the absence of Zimbabwe actually paying of the money, so offsetting the amount of Zimbabwe result, if the amount we pay Zimbabwe under other taxation had, so things like PAYE. But also in the quarter there was a $3 million outflow for ZESA. ZESA supply the electricity, over a year ZESA had been insisting that we pay them offshore outside Zimbabwe, surprise we couldn’t get the foreign exchange to pay them, and so therefore we effectively we’re not paying our electricity bill, which we – in the $6.5 million. In last quarter ZESA and the RBZ or the Reserve Bank in Zimbabwe intervened and ZESA is now accepting payment domestically, and so we’re now in a Phase 1 program to paid down of $6.5 million, but approximately $1 million a month. And so that will continue until the ZESA build forced to renewable at about $800,000. So that really explains what’s happening on the working capital front. The ZESA situation we’ll stabilize towards the end of quarter three, stock is in our hands and we have taken steps to deal with the government receivable. So I think really, unless anyone start anything about – anything, no I mean really that’s what we have to say on these results. So I think we’re ready to open questions now.