Good morning, and welcome to CION Investment Corporation's Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Our earnings press release was distributed earlier this morning before market opened. A copy of the release, along with the supplemental earnings presentation is available on the company's website at www.cionbdc.com in the Investor Resources section and should be reviewed in conjunction with the company's Form 10-K filed with the SEC. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded for replay purposes. Please note that today's conference call may contain forward-looking statements, which are not guarantees of future performance or results and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements as a result of numbers of factors, including those described in the company's filings with the SEC. Joining me on today's call will be Michael Reisner, CION Investment Corporation's Co-Chief Executive Officer; Gregg Bresner, President and Chief Investment Officer; and Keith Franz, Chief Financial Officer. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Michael Reisner. Please go ahead, Michael.

Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Before I address our quarterly results, I want to step back for a moment and highlight what I believe is the most important takeaway from this quarter. We believe that our core first lien portfolio which represents approximately 81% of our investments continues to perform well. Weighted average interest coverage across our portfolio increased quarter-over-quarter from 1.94x to 2.6x. And EBITDA growth in our portfolio companies primarily continues on a positive trajectory, and our risk rated 4 and 5 names held steady at approximately 2.4% of the portfolio at fair value. We added 1 new term loan to nonaccrual status during the quarter, Healthway. And overall, nonaccruals remained essentially flat compared to the prior quarter at 1.78% of the portfolio at fair value. I would also note that our software exposure stands at approximately 1.8% of the portfolio at fair value, a reflection of our long-standing and intentional decision to avoid that sector. For investors who have expressed concern about software concentrations in BDC portfolios broadly, we believe our positioning should provide meaningful comfort and Gregg will speak further to our sector discipline. Overall, we are not seeing the material cracks in private credit that the press has been eager to report. Now turning to our NAV. Our net asset value decreased 7.4% quarter-over-quarter the $13.76 down from $14.86 at the end of September. I want to stress that this decline was driven almost entirely by unrealized mark-to-market adjustments and a handful of equity positions, specifically, 4-wall entertainment, David's Bridal and Avison. These are unrealized marks, not realized credit losses. And as we have discussed on prior calls, our equity book can introduce meaningful quarter-to-quarter volatility into our NAV. We have always been transparent with the market about this potential volatility, and this quarter,…

Thank you, Michael, and good morning, everyone. Prior to covering our investment and portfolio activity for Q4, I would like to expand on Michael's comments regarding our nominal level of software exposure within the portfolio. We ended the quarter with 3 software portfolio companies totaling 1.8% of portfolio fair value or 2% on an amortized cost basis. All 3 of these software companies were underwritten on a performing positive EBITDA basis with a weighted average net tranche level of approximately 4.4x EBITDA at closing. We have no ARR loans in the portfolio. As a firm, we have historically not invested in software as we were unwilling to lend against an ARR growth methodology with negative EBITDA profile at closing. We view the ARR software profile more as a venture-oriented investment with equity-like risk that require return levels well in excess of the yields typically offered on first-lien debt investments. In terms of our Q4 investment activity, we remain highly selective with new portfolio investments, and we're focused on transactions within our portfolio of companies. We also were effectively at full investment during most of the quarter and work to balance the timing of expected investment pipeline investments versus repayment amounts while maintaining our targeted net leverage range. Overall, we had fewer exiting repayments for the quarter versus our Q3 level as certain repayments drifted into Q1 of 2026. During the quarter, we passed on a historically higher percentage of potential investments in new portfolio companies based on credit and pricing considerations. While secondary credit market conditions were choppy in Q4 due to speculation regarding tariffs and interest rate policies, the government shutdown and market concerns regarding potential cracks in private credit, there remained a significant bifurcation for the new issue market. New issue pricing continued to be driven by the…

Okay. Thank you, Gregg, and good morning, everyone. During the fourth quarter, net investment income was $18.3 million or $0.35 per share compared to $38.6 million or $0.74 per share reported in the third quarter. Total investment income was $53.8 million during the fourth quarter as compared to $78.7 million reported during the third quarter. The decrease in total investment income was driven primarily by lower interest income earned on our investments, as a result of certain investments being restructured in the prior quarter and other yield-enhancing prepayment fees and accelerated OID that did not reoccur this quarter. We also had lower transaction fees earned from origination and restructuring activities when compared to the prior quarter, which was slightly offset by an increase in dividend income received from 1 of our investments during the fourth quarter. On the expense side, total operating expenses were $35.5 million compared to $40.1 million reported in the third quarter. The decrease in operating expenses was primarily driven by lower advisory fees due to lower investment income earned during the quarter. At December 31, we had total assets of approximately $1.9 billion and total equity or net assets of $708 million with total debt outstanding of $1.1 billion and 51.4 million shares outstanding. Our portfolio at fair value ended the quarter at $1.7 billion, and the weighted average yield on our debt and other income-producing investments at amortized cost was 10.7%, which is slightly down from 10.9% in the third quarter. At December 31, our NAV was $13.76 per share as compared to $14.86 per share at the end of September. The decrease of $1.10 per share or 7.4% was primarily due to unrealized mark-to-market price decreases in our portfolio, mostly from price declines in our equity book, which was slightly offset by the creative…

[Operator Instructions] And the first question comes from the line of Erik Zwick with Lucid Capital Markets.

I wanted to start with a question on leverage. And you noted that, that was up in the quarter, and some of that was driven by the fair value marks in the equity portfolio, but it's run fairly above kind of where you've run in the past. So just curious on your thoughts for the appropriate level of leverage today and how you plan to kind of manage that over the next year or so?

Eric, it's Keith. Yes. So in terms of the elevated leverage, I think the way that we're looking at it is over the next few quarters, some organic growth in the NAV positions may help -- but ultimately, we expect to use some of the scheduled on scheduled repayment activity we typically receive to delever. .

That's helpful. And -- next question, just on PIK income. I think you've previously indicated the desire to reduce the contribution from income. Looking at the results in 2025 that was up on both absolute dollar terms as well as a percentage of total investment income. So First, just wondering, could you provide a split of kind of tick by design versus restructured PIK? And do you still have plans to kind of aim to reduce that overall contribution? .

Eric, it's Gregg. From your characterization, we -- as we do this about 75% of our PIK is by design where it's either incremental cash interest or we structured it intentionally that way on a deal basis. So it's about 75% based on those classifications. With respect to going forward, our PIK is concentrated in a few names that we do expect to refinance over the next 12 to 18 months. So we do expect that number organically to come down significantly as those deals repay. .

I appreciate the update there. Last one for me. In the press release, you noted that the weighted average interest coverage for the portfolio increased quarter-over-quarter from 1.9 to if I round, which is nice to see. I'm curious if that was primarily a reflection of just lower interest rates flowing through the portfolio or if you're also seeing some improvement in EBITDA as well.

It's a combination of both. It's a combination of increased EBITDA as well as the reduction in base rates. So it's -- the base rate is obviously more about, but we did see EBITDA growth over the quarter. .

This concludes the Q&A session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Michael Reisner for closing remarks. .

Great. Well, I want to thank everybody for tuning in today, and we'll be back to you in a couple of months with our Q1 results. Take care, everybody. .

Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and we thank you for your participation.