Gregg Bresner
Analyst · Wells Fargo
Thank you, Michael. Good morning, everyone. I will start by sharing some data on the backdrop of the current U.S. credit markets before moving to our investment activity for the quarter. Overall, we believe the overriding ending market themes for the quarter were volatility and uncertainty. The U.S. leveraged loan sector broken nearly all records in 2021 on the backdrop of a market of washing liquidity where investor demand significantly eclipsed supply. That trend continued into February of 2022 as unprecedented fund inflows into the loan market, particularly in private credit, effectively masked the fundamental impacts of supply chain challenges and inflation on borrowers and consumers that we have seen for some time. We believe some managers needed to more urgently put their unprecedented cash raises to work resulting in tighter investment spreads, deal over subscriptions and the flexing down of pricing terms. This is particularly well noted in the fact that riskier credits with at least 1B- equivalent rating accounted for 50% of the total new issuance during the quarter, an all-time record. This intuitively unsustainable market dynamic abated in February as uncertainty over the war in Ukraine and the ever rippling effects of supply chain and inflation challenges eventually rattled investors and resulted in the first weekly loan outflow in March 2022 to loan mutual funds and ETFs since early 2021. Nevertheless, overall net loan fund inflows in the first quarter of 2022 through March 30 totaled $21.8 billion, the most for any quarter since 2013. In spite of the high net inflows into the loan market during the quarter, market uncertainty impacted transaction activity as the total new market loan issuance was $149.1 billion, a 35% decline from the first quarter of 2021. New issue spreads for institutional loans increased dramatically in March to 453 basis points, up from 374 basis points in January and 405 basis points in February. The March 2022 level is the highest since December 2018. The average yield to maturity for the middle market loan index at the end of the quarter was 5.79%. While many managers point to the relatively low current default rates as an indicator of a relatively strong overall market credit profile, we do not share that sentiment. We believe the inherent lagging nature of the default rate calculation and the large overall percentage of covenant-wide debt structures in the market have substantially diluted the predictive value of the default rate for credit profiling. The total quarterly return performance of key indexes captures the overall reversals in investment sentiment that took place later in the quarter. The S&P/LSTA leveraged loan index was down 10 basis points. The S&P U.S. high-yield corporate index was down 4.83%. The S&P Equity 500 Index, down 4.6%. The S&P Investment-Grade Corporate Bond Index, down 7.06%. And NASDAQ down 9%. CION's total return to investors of 2.6% for the first quarter of 2022 was driven by the fund's continued defensive underwriting and outlook, staunch first-lien focus and highly selective and diversified approach to investing. We were certainly not immune to the macroeconomic and geopolitical factors affecting the overall market as increases in spreads and volatility resulted in a net negative mark-to-market impact of 1.2% to our total quarterly return to investors. CION continues to implement a measured and cautious approach to our organic portfolio growth through the utilization of our increased debt capacity. We have strategically chosen to avoid disproportionately large fundraises that inherently raise the risk to our investor returns through us having to urgently put cash to work and buy the market during less attractive market periods. We have chosen instead to implement a measured step-function growth approach to achieving our targeted 1.0 to 1.25x leverage level that better matches our fundraising to our selective originated investment pipeline. Turning now to investment activity. Despite the highly volatile market environment, Q1 was a solid quarter for CION on the heels of a robust Q4 of 2021. During the quarter, we made 15 new investment commitments totaling $155 million across 8 new portfolio companies and 7 existing portfolio companies. Of the $155 million in new investment commitments made during the quarter, $123 million were funded and $32 million were unfunded. Fundings of previously unfunded commitments totaled $15 million for the quarter. As a result, net funded investment activity increased by $77 million. We were able to sustain our ability to originate new first lien debt investments at a significant premium to the 5.79% yield to maturity of the S&P middle market loan index. During Q1, the weighted average yield to maturity of our funded first lien fundings was approximately 8.8%. Moving on to portfolio composition. At quarter end, we had 198 investments across 115 portfolio companies in 22 industries with a total fair value of about $1.7 billion, comprised of 93.9% in senior secured debt. This included 91.8% in first lien debt, 2.1% in second lien debt, 4.3% in equity, 1.6% in unsecured debt and less than 1% in structured products. Approximately 90% of the performing loan portfolio was in floating rate investments. As of March 31, our performing loan portfolio had a gross annual yield prior to leverage of 9.12% compared to 9.16% at the end of the fourth quarter with a weighted average purchase price of 98.06% of par and an average investment size of about $15.1 million per portfolio company. Turning next to credit quality. The weighted average net debt to EBITDA of our portfolio companies was 4.74x at March 31, as compared to 4.52x at December 31, 2021. The weighted average interest coverage of our portfolio companies remained stable at 3.7x, consistent with the prior quarter. As of March 31, investments on nonaccrual status were 0.6% and 2.3% of the total investment portfolio at fair value and at an amortized costs, respectively, compared to 0.7% and 2.4%, respectively. As of the end of the fourth quarter, we did not place any new investments on nonaccrual status during the quarter. Our investments with internal risk ratings of 4 and 5 continue to make up less than 1% of the total portfolio. Of note, those investments rated 2 or higher increase from roughly 85% at year-end to approximately 89% at quarter end. Although about 11% of our investments were rated 3 at quarter end which was down from 14% at year-end. It is important to note that our definition of a rated grade investment is one that indicates a higher risk to our ability to recoup the cost of such investment. It has increased since origination or acquisition but a full return of principal and interest through dividend is expected. A portfolio company with an internal risk rating of 3 requires more active monitoring. I will now turn the call over to Keith.