Leonardo George De Magalhaes
Analyst
Thank you very much, Reynaldo. Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for your participation in this video call for the results of the second quarter. I will mention some highlights, and then I'll turn the floor to Velez, who will go into the figures, he will compare quarter-on-quarter. And I would like to start on Slide number 6 about our voluntary redundancy program. Mr. Reynaldo mentioned our operating efficiency process, which is continuous. And the company understands that the cost reduction process already has had positive results in the second quarter, and our costs are dropping continuously, and we understand that the process is going to – started or is coming and is going to have effects throughout 2021. And among one of these factors of cost reduction, we understand that the voluntary redundancy program has an important role. We implemented this program now, and we had the enrollment of almost 400 employees. And for 2021, that is going to represent a reduction in our cost of 95 million, and that already considering a small replacement. And of course, there is an outsourcing effect here, but that is not high, if we compare with the gains that we are going to have with the PE gain. So, we understand that this 95 million recovery is very significant. And basically, eight months, we are going to recover that. And we understand that when we invest in efficiency, we can have this as a permanent gain in our results. On the next slide, and Dr. Reynaldo already mentioned the COVID account enrollment and the funds have already been received, that this 1.4 billion were approved. And the first tranche was 1.18 billion, reinforcing our cash and liquidity contributing to reduce our leverage, and that allows us to have a comfortable position. And now we start the second half of the year with a cash position that allows us to pay for our debt without having to have new finances or rolling over. And so as I said, this is very comfortable, the company can deal well with the pandemics moment. Another topic on Slide number 8, and we did have a material fact disclosed to the market. Our tariff adjustment allowed by ANEEL was 4.27%, backdated to May 28. We had administrative appeals with ANEEL questioning this adjustment because the company had already received a judicial deposit amount regarding the recovery of PIS, Pasep tax credits over ICMS. And then we received cash to the distributing company. So, we understood that in order to provide a contribution to society right now in the pandemics, and this is also something that can reduce delinquency with those action we sent and [indiscernible] to ANEEL when we proposed that 714 million of this 1.2 billion that we have already received a judicial deposit regarding that tax credit over ICMS lawsuit. And this issue is going to be discussed by ANEEL to all distributing companies in the segment in the future, in the next few months. But in an anticipated fashion, we already agreed that 714 million of this amount can be reimbursed to our consumers. And it's important to highlight here that the 714 million are within the 10-year period that we understand that should be reimbursed to consumers. And the success of this lawsuit of Cemig D was 6 billion. We understand that [2 million] is from a period prior to 10 years, [4 million] is an amount within the [10 million] that should be reimbursed to consumers, and this 714 million are within this 4 billion. So, we believe this has positive effect for the company, for our consumers, and we understand that this should be a balanced situation because we are recognizing the efforts of the company of having filed that lawsuit in 2008, advocating for the rights of consumers and we understand the company also deserves to receive a share of this amount because of its efficiency when dealing with this tax issue. This is going to be defined by ANEEL's Executive Board, but this was the company's proposal. On Slide number 9, we have delinquency and losses. Our losses today are at 2% higher than what is recognized by ANEEL to [3.66] and recognized by ANEEL is 11.45, and we are implementing a whole series of measures to reduce those losses, telemetering for major clients, a higher number of inspections. And we expect that by 2021, we are able to bring to 0 that gap of 2% that we have today vis-à-vis of what is covered by the tariffs. Our losses add up to 13.66%. We are working a lot internally. We have taken several measures to reduce losses that involve several actions of the company. It's not a single action. We have inspection style and metering, technology, effective actions, intelligence in the process. And we expect that by the end of 2021, we are able to reduce close to 0, these losses. Default also, we imagine that this would happen in the second quarter because of the pandemics, and it had to do with the economic situation of families. And the ADA was 199 million in this half of year vis-à-vis 108 million for past year. And also, we have to say that disconnections were suspended. We did not have any disconnections in the second quarter. Disconnections are coming back now. We know the disconnections are very sensitive in terms of dealing with delinquencies. So, disconnections are happening again now in August. And we have held several campaigns to renegotiate that involving low-income customers, hospitals, and small companies to reduce delinquency rate. Also, we should say that now in July, we enrolled to a state law that would allow us to offset all debts with electric energy up to June of 2019. And these debts should be received with ICMS, and we can discount to ICMS that we paid the state on a monthly basis up to the end of 2022. So, the debt that we have in the receivables, around 220 million, 240 million, is going to be received up to the end of 2022. And that will allow us, considering this is a real guarantee, to reverse the provision that we have for ADA, and that refers to the share of the debt of the state of Minas. So in spite of our provision being of 199 up to June, we expect that by the end of the year, it reaches a 170 million at the most, exactly because now in the second quarter, we will have a reversal in the provision in this amount that we mentioned, 220 million, 240 million because of this agreement signed with the state administration. We think this is good news, and that shows the effort of the company in this process of the renegotiation of debt with customers and in the case that the state had a higher debt. And it's also important because we did have that regulation by the state because this was a past due debt. Talking about efficiency on Slide 10, we talk about our quality indicators. We believe this is another good news. The company is more efficient operationally. We are reducing cost without damaging, without hurting quality. Our average frequency duration per consumer has always been much lower than what is established by the regulating agency and is still very good. Our indexes are good. We did have 2.28. And the regulating agency establishes 3.24. And DEC also expected that this is the last year in the cycle, after the beginning of the conceptions – concessions, so it's very important for us in terms of the DEC. We believe we are going to meet the figure. And here, we have the average of the last 12 months. And compared to the prior year, we are one hour with a better quality in service to our consumers. We understand this is also good news. This is the first time that the company has a DEC that is lower than 10 hours a year because these are annualized results. So, we understand it shows our commitment with customers in terms of asset-based modernization and having investments that have consequences to – that improve our quality indicators. On Slide 11, we have our distribution load. Cemig in the second quarter had a load reduction close to 6%. It was one of the lowest distribution loads here in Brazil. We were able to see that very clearly that even with the pandemic's effects, and well, this is going to show you that our distributing company had resilience in the results. And here, we see the figures up to June and July and August. Still, this is preliminary. We had a drop here, a reduction in the load in April specifically. And then the load picked up back in May and June. And now July and August, it is even higher than what we saw in 2019. That is a market recovery in the state of Minas Gerais. It really is high. Our own load is still with a reduction. It matched 2019, but came down a little bit, but for free clients, it's much higher. So, our expectation for the second half of the year, and of course, we have traded a little bit, but the chart trend shows a recovery of the load of Cemig distribution vis-à-vis the second quarter and even of the year of 2019. On Slide 12, we have the tariff review of transmission, and Dr. Reynaldo mentioned, but we should highlight that Cemig GT is a benchmark in the sector with CTEEP. So, we have discipline in our transmission costs. And it's important to say that in our tariff review – because it had happened already, a tariff review in the distributing company. This is important to show the regulatory compliance of the company and how the company is making very prudent investments. And that's important when we think about expectation of revenue for Cemig GT and D. And here, we have an increase of 9.13% in [our APR], and it's 100 million higher than the prior RAP of 640 million, close now to 780 million adjusted for June 2020. And because of this [APR], this new pricing of assets of transmission by ANEEL and the regulatory base, that is an accounting difference there, and this new base approved by ANEEL has generated a creditor effect of 430 million. And this effect, of course this 430 million effect at this moment is non-recurring. It does not mean that it's going into our cash position right now. But in the future, this impact of 430 million will revert into the company in a significant revenue in our transmission business. Now, talking about GT, just as the same, we had a major recovery in GT revenue here in August. We reached 1,954 megawatts or gigawatts – average gigawatts, higher than what we had in March of last year. And when we break it down, we see the incentive-based once with the loads too lower. Here in the incentive-based, we have shopping malls and other areas that have been impacted by the pandemics, but in the conventional clients, we see a significant recovery. We believe that is very relevant and even at higher levels than what we had seen in March. And continuing, we see that this creates an expectation for the next half of year. We know that Cemig GT's results in this quarter suffered a little bit because there was a drop in the demand in the load of our free clients, but we have a favorable expectation for the third and fourth quarter for 2020. Of course, we are going to have to wait a little bit more and to see how the market is going to behave with the pandemics and the Brazilian society as well. And on Slide 14, we had a major concern with our free clients. So, the delivery – we did not have a huge delinquency in the generation sector. And then we had the opportunity to – and we have taken several actions to have bill deferrals of the difference between the take and what effectively was consumed by our clients in a period of up to 36 months. And we believe we have been well succeeded because although we postponed the cash, we were able to have GT's effective delinquency to be very low. In April, of course, we showed the results of the quarter, but in April, we did have a higher provision, but that was reverted in the following months because we were successful in negotiating these overdue bills with our customers and clients. We believe this is also good news. So for Cemig GT, we understand once again that the results have been affected in this quarter, but we do have reasons to be optimistic about the second half of 2020. Now, I'll turn the floor to Velez so that he can analyze the results into details for the second quarter of 2020 and also in the first half of 2020 when compared to the first half of 2019.
Antônio Vélez: Thank you, Leo. So, I will turn now to the results of the second quarter, and then I will talk a little bit about the trend of the first half of the year. On Slide 16, we have here some comments that are important to be taken into consideration because they also explain our results. For the holding, we have the restatement at market value of Light with a positive impact of BRL475 million. Remember that Light is in our balance sheet as an asset available for sale. And because this is a listed company, at every quarter, we have to do the mark-to-market and the amount of our shares. So here, we did have a positive impact of 475 million, and that is in our results as well. At Cemig Distribution here, we have a lower volume, as Leo has mentioned and our COO. So, we had a drop in energy sold of 6%. In our captive clients, this drop was of 8%, and transmission was down 3.5%. Also in the voluntary redundancy program, the expense is allocated. And here, we have more people involved, as you know, but the expenses allocated for that was 46 million. For Cemig GT, the main effect in the results here for Cemig GT was the sale of energy at the lower limit of flexibility contract range. This was the main effect. We also had the tariff review for transmission already mentioned, which allowed us to have a positive effect on the amount of the concession. Therefore, that also ran through our EBITDA in the amount of BRL430 million. The voluntary redundancy program, the expenses allocated for Cemig GT was of 11 million. We also had the marking to market of the Eurobonds, which had a positive effect in Q2 2020 of 71 million. And when you compare that to the 2Q 2019, also there, we had a positive effect of BRL558 million. So here, on Slide number 17, we have the explanation of that variation of mark-to-market of Eurobonds and also hedge instruments. And in this case, we had the hedge instrument that had a positive variation of BRL487 million, while the debt amount when we consider the depreciation of real, it had a negative variation of BRL416 million. So, the impact in our financial result is of 71 million positive. So, this is our hedge working to protect our debt. Turning to Slide 18, and here we have an energy market for Cemig Distribution in the second quarter of 2020. We had a reduction in the load of Cemig D of 6% and the transported energy from distribution – Cemig Distribution had a drop of 3.5%, and the captive market had a drop of 8%. If we analyze that into the details and we break it down, the consumption classes, we have – as expected, we did have a drop in all the segments, exception made to residential consumers. As we know, everyone was at home, so it's no surprise that the residential consumption was higher during this period. Now, turning to Slide 19. We have here our EBITDA and consolidated net profit. And we have here an analysis because of these effects and nonrecurring effects on our daily operations or that are not referenced to the long-term. So, we made a few adjustments. When we – well, let me comment the EBITDA and the adjusted net profit, you see the charts here and also in our release, if you want to understand it better, but these are all the facts that we already know and that have already been discussed here in the presentation. Our adjusted EBITDA and I would say that it had a drop of 6.8%, which I consider small starting on [BRL1.07 billion] to BRL939 million in the second quarter of 2020. Net profit had an increase of almost 5% starting at BRL415 million in 2Q 2019 to BRL435 million in 2Q 2020. Now turning to Slide 20, we have Cemig GT with EBITDA and net profit. As we have mentioned, when we not consider the tariff review, we have the EBITDA in the second quarter of 2020 of 341 million, a drop of 33% compared to the same period of last year. And this drop is because of the seasonalization and mainly what I have mentioned, our free clients had a reduction in consumption, and therefore, they were billed in the lower limit of the contract flexibility. They have been billed on the take. So that generated a drop in our revenue. And the energy available was sold at the spot price at an amount or price that was lower than the contract. And you all know that this was low this period. And the net profit in the second quarter of 2020 for Cemig GT had a drop of 63% from 88 million in 2Q 2019 to 7 million in 2Q 2020. Cemig Distribution, on the other hand, had a very good result also considering the scenario, of course, that we expected better than last year, but this was higher than last year from 407 million of last year, if we do not consider PIS, Cofins tax credits and to 535 million this year, a growth of 31.4%, and this is also because – and it's important to remind everyone, that is thanks to our operating efficiency efforts. And I will go into the details in the next slide. Same thing for net profit. Here, in recurring terms, it went from BRL152 million in 2Q 2019 to BRL285 million in 2Q 2020, a growth of over 87%. In terms of operating costs and expenses for the company, when we basically look at what would be the PMSO, the expenses that are manageable here, I'm also not considering provisions because last year, we had a huge provision that would impact the analysis. It was the provision for Renova credits of almost BRL700 million. So when we look at PMSO here, we have a reduction of over 8% in the second quarter of 2019 to the second quarter of 2020. That is significant if we consider also expenses of the voluntary redundancy program. So that's a reduction of over BRL70 million. It's important to stress also here on Slide 22 that out of the budget that we had originally for 2020, we still had a reduction for this year of BRL150 million in materials and services. And this is already being seen after the second quarter. On Slide 23, and I'm mentioning the numbers, but these are the same effects, but now with the specific figures that we had in the first half of 2020, and now we are going to compare to the first half of 2019. So, in the first half, for Light, we had a reduction of BRL134 million in the first half of 2020. Also, we have a restatement at fair value for Centroeste, a gain of 52 million. For Cemig Distribution, there was a drop in the energy distributed of 4%. The captive market was down 6%, and transmission was down 1.3%. Once again, the 46 million expenses with a voluntary redundancy program and an increase of ADA of 91 million. Our allowance for that full account – doubtful accounts, at Cemig GT, as I mentioned, we had a profit affected by sale of energy at lower limit of flexibility contract range. We also had the tariff review, the voluntary redundancy program and the marking to market of Eurobond. We had a positive effect of 677 million in the first half of 2019 against a negative effect of 367 million in the first half of 2020. On Slide 24, the energy market for Cemig Distribution in the first half of the year had a reduction of 4%, the billed market and transmission, and the free market was down 1.3%, and the captive market was down 6%. Once again, when we look at the consumption segment, the only one that has increased, that had a positive variation was the residential consumers that when we compare the first half of 2019 and the first half of 2020, residential consumers were up 2.8%. On Slide 25, consolidated EBITDA and net profit, we see an increase in adjusted EBITDA of over 12%, as our CEO mentioned in the beginning, from BRL2.34 billion in the first half of 2019 to [BRL2.284 billion] in the first half of 2020. And net profit and recurring terms had an increase of 20%, reaching BRL1.022 billion in this quarter. On Slide 26, EBITDA and net profit for Cemig GT, and here, the EBITDA had an increase of 2% if we just consider non-recurring impact up to [BRL1.026 billion]. And net profit had a reduction of 15.8%, especially because of the hedge effect, which was not offset by other effects. Now EBITDA net profit for Cemig Distribution for the first half of 2020, Slide number 27, still we see growth of almost 13% for the EBITDA in the first half of 2020, BRL1.029 billion. Same thing for net profit, a growth of over 41%, from 340 million in the first half of 2019 million to 481 million in the first half of 2020. On Slide 28, we also see the same trend of expenses reduction, of PMSO reduction in the first half of the year that we had seen in the quarters. Our operating expenses have dropped 8.2% when compared to the first half of last year. On Slide 29, we have the comparison of Cemig Distribution in terms of the regulatory and what was realized. For OpEx, we understand that we had a regulatory cover of operating expenses of BRL1.323 billion, and the realized was BRL196 million higher than the coverage that we have, as you can see here, the real OpEx. This is because our retirement and post-job expenses and post-retirement expenses, BRL 152 million, and also our default provision. And turning to the EBITDA, the regulatory EBITDA and the real EBITDA, we then had the regulatory EBITDA in here BRL 1.323 billion, and here, we have OpEx, BRL 196 million, and also other losses here, non-technical losses, as it already was mentioned, that had a negative effect of BRL108 million. So, the real EBITDA was BRL1.025 billion. So in this quarter, our EBITDA was BRL300 million below the regulatory EBITDA. As our CEO mentioned, and our CFO also mentioned, we are working hard so that the distributing company overcomes and is able to meet the regulatory targets that we have. At cash flow generation, we have here short summary on Slide 30 of our cash flow generation in December of 2019 was of BRL1.300 billion. So, we had a cash generation in the first half of 2020 of BRL4.2 billion. In this period also, we paid some debt of over BRL1 billion. And we have made investments of 700 million. So our cash in June, as it already has been mentioned, it was very robust, consolidated cash of BRL3.7 billion, not considering the amount that has already been received in the COVID account of 1.2 billion at the end of July. Turning to the next slide, 31, we have our debt profile. And here is the consolidated result. This is a debt that's very comfortable. So, when we look at the maturities timetable, we have an average tenor here of 3.8 years. Of course, that, we'd like to extend it a little bit more, but in the short term, between 2020 and 2023, we have very comfortable maturities. And within our cash generation, we don't have major problems, not only cash generation, but also cash position. We have a tower wall in 2024, which is here, the Eurobond that is due in 2024. In terms of net debt, we had a net debt of BRL12.2 billion. And when you consider the present value of hedge, because this is the amount that we would be receiving right now if we were to pay the debt today, and we have to take that into consideration, so it is like we had a net debt of BRL8.9 billion. So our main indexor’s here, you can see most of our debt is dollar-denominated debt, and the remainder is distributed, just as the same between IPCA, 24% of the debt; and CDI, 23%. Remember that our dollar-denominated debt is protected, as I mentioned, by hedge instruments that are transformed into CDI. Our cost of debt also have a strong reduction since 2018. The nominal cost of our debt at the end of 2018 was of 9.67%. And now in June of 2020, the cost of debt is 4.3%, and that also has to do with the reduction of the CDI, but the debt in the dollar-denominated debt, the bond that was hedged, 142% of the CDI. Now this is a relatively affordable debt, if we consider any debt that we might contract from now on. And as our CEO mentioned, when we see – when we analyze the leverage indicators, total net debt over adjusted EBITDA of 2x already in June 2020 – from – you can see here almost 3 to 2 in June. This was a very quick recovery of our financial soundness. And also capital structure, which is measured total net debt over equity plus total net debt of 34.5%, also a very robust structure. Turning now to Slide number 32, I'm almost at the end of our presentation. We have here the Eurobond covenants. Maybe these are the most restrictive ones. And here, we show and we focus on the covenants in June. So, net debt over EBITDA for Cemig GT, it was 2.85x, and the limit for that covenant is of 4.5. And here, you can see the breakdown of the calculations. It's very transparent on how the calculation is done. And for the holding, just as the same, the indicator of net debt over EBITDA covenants is 2.12x. And the limit here for this covenant is 3.5. So, this is a very comfortable position as well. And now turning to the end of our presentation on Slide 33. I would like you to save the date, September 15, a month from now, basically, so that you can be with us in this 25th Annual Cemig Meeting with the capital markets. We hold that every year. This is already our 25th edition. Normally, this is done in May. Unfortunately, this was not possible this year because of the pandemics, but we really wanted to do it, and we are preparing. This event is going to be fully digital this year, and we hope to have you with us. So, please save the date, September 15. We do expect you to be with us. That's what we had to explain our results of the second quarter. And now we are going to open the floor for the Q&A session.