Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. Good morning and welcome to the Choice Hotels International Fourth Quarter and Year End 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Later, there will be a question-and-answer session and further instructions will be given at that time. As a reminder, today's call is being recorded. During the course of this conference call, certain predictive or forward-looking statements will be used to assist you in understanding the Company and its results, which constitute forward-looking statements under the Safe Harbor provisions of the Securities Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified by phrases such as Choice or its management believe, expects, anticipates, foresees, forecasts, eliminates, or other words or phrases. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied. Please consult the Company's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and other SEC filings for information about important risk factors affecting the Company that you should consider. Although, we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you, do not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which reflect our analysis and speak only as of today's date. We undertake no obligation to publicly update our forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. You can find a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures referred to in our remarks as part of our fourth quarter and year end 2016 earnings press release, which is posted on our website at choicehotels.com under the Investor Information section. With that being said, I would now like to introduce Steve Joyce, Chief Executive Officer of Choice Hotels International Incorporated. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, good morning. Thanks for joining us today. I am also joined by Scott Oaksmith, our Chief Accounting Officer. We are excited to share with you Choice Hotels fourth quarter 2016 and year-end earnings update. Choice continues to have strong performance. There are many factors that are contributing to this, highlighted by our strong leadership team who drive the right business objectives, excellence in our organization and results for our shareholders. Today, I am going to focus on three specific key initiatives, the strategic efforts to help increase the franchisees profitability resulting in Choice outperforming the industry and RevPAR, our accelerated growth and performance in the upscale category and the strong development momentum in the United States and internationally. Let’s start with our efforts to help our franchise increase profitability, which is resulted in strong RevPAR results that are outperforming the industry. The initiatives include the SmartRates proprietary pricing optimization system and our customer acquisition strategies with our re-launch royalty program Choice Privileges. These tools have made a very positive impact on RevPAR. Domestic system wide RevPAR increased 3.9% and exceeded total industry results by 70 basis points. We also exceeded growth reported for each of our respective competitive segments. Choice upscale, upper midscale, midscale and economy brands grew RevPAR at higher rates than the respective segments with Smith Travel Research reports ranging from 2.1% to 3.1%. This marks the ninth consecutive month and eight of the nine last quarters that Choice’s RevPAR performance growth has outperformed the industry; however, SmartRates in Choice Privileges attributing to this growth. SmartRates is the most advance RevPAR technology in the industry and a powerful tool for our franchises. It is being used by more than 90% of our domestic franchises to help them better analyze market conditions and set their hotel rates.…

Thanks, Steve. Good morning everyone. 2016 was another great year for Choice Hotels as we again posted record revenue, operating income and net income. Let’s start by reviewing our fourth quarter performance. We increased our diluted earnings per share by 10% over the prior year and exceeded our guidance for at least $0.51 per share by $0.05. Our full year adjusted diluted EPS was $2.49, which represents a 12% increase over the prior year and exceeded our guidance of $2.43 to $2.46 per share. Our full year 2016 adjusted hotel franchise EBITDA increased 7% to $273 million and was in line with our previous outlook for that metric of $272 million to 274 million. Steve spoke about our few of our key initiatives to drive growth. I'm going to provide further details on three of our performance metrics since that were key to our strong fourth quarter results which closed out this record setting year. These include our domestic royalty revenues, continued improvement in our franchise development results and predict cost management. First, our domestic royalty revenues, the improvement in our hotel franchising revenues for the quarter were primarily driven by our domestic royalties, which increased 8% over the prior year to $68.4 million. The critical areas that drive our domestic royalty growth continue to improve in the fourth quarter highlighted by our domestic system wide RevPAR, which increased 5% in the fourth quarter and 3.9% for the full year, a 1.6% increase in our domestic system size and a 13 basis points increase in our fourth quarter effective royalty rates. Our fourth quarter RevPAR growth of 5% achieved the top end of our guidance and was driven by 150 basis points increase in occupancy and a 2.3% increase in average daily rate. As Steve mentioned, we are particularly pleased…

Thanks, Scott. Before we move to questions, I just want to reinforce that we had a great year and are very optimistic that we will continue to drive excellent results for our company and shareholders. With our strong leadership team who are driving the right business objectives and results, we’re excited about our future success and growth which in 2016 was highlighted by three key initiatives, the strategic efforts to help increase franchisee profitability resulting in Choice outperforming the industry and RevPAR. Our accelerated growth and performance in the upscale category and the strong development momentum in the United States and Internationally. So with that, let’s open it up for questions.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Felicia Hendrix with Barclays. Your line is now open.

Hi, it's actually Anthony Powell here for Felicia. How are you?

Good morning.

Good morning. How are you?

Good. Just a question on the royalty rate increase in the guidance. If you can explain more about the mechanism of what’s going there. Are you signing more deals with higher franchise royalty fees rather? What are your publish royalty rates right now? If you can more some more detail on that that will be great.

Sure. I’ll take that one. So the growth in the royalty rates going to be attribute to multitude of factors. As you know, we’ve been improving the quality of our -- as a result, our brands are performing better than ever. This provides pricing power when we are negotiating new franchise agreements. We’ve also increased the rack royalty rates for six of our brands as we get in April of 2016, increased those between 25 and 50 basis points over the six brands. And also -- we’ve also historically revised royalty rate discount as a customer acquisition tactic, as these discounts burn off over the first two years of the contract that provides a lift to our royalty rate. So, as we’ve implemented these higher rates, we have opportunity as we sign new contracts to sign them at these new higher rates as well as when hotels relicense in our system, which I think we had close to 450 our hotels relicensed this year, that give us an opportunity to sign new franchise agreement at these new higher rates. So, this is the real drivers behind that royalty rate increase.

Got it. And can we expect these types of 10, 12, 14 bps improvements in rates annually for next few years or what do you think the cadence of that will be?

We believe that we should be able to have this pace of increase for over next several years.

All right. And my final one just on SkyTouch. If you can give a bit more detail on the driver of the cost reductions? Are you just making reducing expenses there? And what do you think the values generated from your investment activities over the past several years have been?

So, I think the way to think about it is. We built the product that we think is the right product for the marketplace. That investment is done. We will continue to update it for independent hotels and other brands as well as our owned, but we think the bulk of the investment that we needed to make has been made. So, now we're simply in the selling the product mode, which is why we were able to bring the expenses down to basically breakeven. So, as we look at back, we think there is an opportunity going forward, we do believe we've created a lot of value. We thought it had value when we first started this project. Based on the discussions we've had with potential other transactions that has borne out us that we have created significant value over and above what we invested, and we're going to continue to look for the opportunity to maximize that for the shareholders.

Thank you. Our next question comes from Shaun Kelley with Bank of America. Your line is now open.

So, maybe just a build up on the last question on SkyTouch because it seems like, it's a big portion of the year-over-year growth in EBITDA. Steve, if I recall correctly last quarter you kind of said that there could be an update within 30 to 60 days on that business, which is kind of explicit timeframe. We never heard that update instead we fast forwarded to this quarter. So, did something change in sort of the trajectory for that business and was rightsizing into the business on the expense base the plan a quarter ago or is this just where you arrived at?

Yes. So, I think if you think about where we were we've said two things. We've said that either within by the end of the year that we're going to have some announcements that we thought optimize the value for the shareholders or we were going to bring it to essentially where we've brought up which is a breakeven level. We were -- have been through a multiple of conversations with other folks interested in it. We did not find the situation that we liked. We continue in some of those conversations, but as Scott said, there is nothing eminent. And so, we're going to continue to evaluate what our options are to maximize the value of that product including future looks that adding to that technology program. So, when we think about it going forward, we want to pick the right time with the right partners, if that's the way we go to optimize that structure and to optimize the value to the shareholders and we're going to continue to work against that. But as we've said and we've committed throughout 2016, we would bring that to a basis where it was not costing the Company money, which is what we've done. And we think we are in good shape to continue to grow it, but also to look for other opportunities to maximize the value of that plus or other technology platforms.

And then my second question would just be on or I guess the focusing on the net unit growth. So full year story there is also beginning to accelerate as you begin to move cost some of the Comfort system exits. So, we're sitting here today, I think you guys said 2% to 3% for net guidance now, but you would be closer to 4.5%. If I caught that number correctly, it's closer to 4.5% net unit growth excluding some of the Comfort piece. So where can we be as we move into 2018 based on your and maybe just correctional at this point. But where can we be on net unit growth in 2018, as you continue to wind down what's going on with Comfort?

So, I think the way to think about that is, historically, we've been 4% to 5.5% supply growth for our brands that sort of where we think we will probably end up. Now, when you look at, it's not all the same because if you look at what Cambria adds, that's a significant increase over what one of our other brands adds by a multiple of three to five. And so the net benefit of Cambria is significantly above some of the others, so that’s a factor to consider. And then as you think about going forward, there are several questions that we're waiting to be answered. We’re pretty optimistic that the lending environment is going to at least stay the same and could improve based on what we’re hearing from the administration. And so, if that occurs then I think you can see a pretty positive development cycle for the next several years. The RevPAR environment, we like where we ended the year and we like where we started off. So and if you believe that anything that’s going on from a government stimulus standpoint helps drive GDP, that’s going to add fuel to the fire and on top of that the employment growth where you’re finally seeing potentially an uptick in the level of employment as a percentage of the workforce is a very positive segment for us because those people going back to work are part of our customer base, and we believe we’re in a position to gain from that probably more than anyone else. So net-net on the development side, if we get a strong financing environment that either is working today obviously based on the deals we’re getting done. But it then even improves our sense is that this cycle may elongate for several more years and if we get a strong incentive within the economy, it's going to spur GDP growth, that just adds more benefit to the overall performance of our hotels.

Yes, I think the only thing I’ll add to that. Historically, we’ve grown our systems size 4 to 5% before the Comfort rejuvenation strategy and even throughout the rejuvenation strategy, our other brands have grown right around there. 2017 should be the final year where we’ve got declines in the Comfort Inn system as we work through that process. So, we filled the pipeline with quite a few new construction projects for Comfort Inn. So, we would expect to see those starting to open in 2018. So, I think we’d just see is kind of continued growth of our core brand and then Comfort Inn declines are stopping and starting to grow again in 2018 and beyond.

And maybe just to be clear, the 4 to 5 is gross or net?

It's net.

That’s net. Okay, great. That’s it from me, thank you very much guys.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Thomas Allen with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open.

Two questions on the RevPAR. First, did you talk about how long you think this RevPAR index outperformance can continue, understand it's coming from smart rate and some other initiatives like I mean how long can that continue? And the second, can you just parse out performance if you can between leisure and corporate trends will be helpful? Thank you.

Yes. So, we just rolled out the smart rates tools this year. So, we’ve got in over 4000 of our hotels, and we think we have a lot of runway there as more people get familiar with the tool except the rates. So, we think that have for the next several years could be an outperformance for us. In addition to all the other initiatives we’ve talked about with our improving royalty program and what are we seeing great adoption of that by guest, which are driving more stays in our hotels, we are pleased that our occupancy rates have outperformed in the industry. So, we’ve maintained with the ADRs and still improve the occupancy. So, I think we feel very bullish about to outperform the industry in 2017. As far as not leisure versus our initiatives, we believe it's about third leisure, two-thirds of our initiatives that are driving our outperformance.

Can you elaborate on the last point on the third? Can you just explain a little bit more?

So, if we think about our outperformance against industry, we think about third of that is because we’re more predominantly leisure travel business, which is held up longer. And the other two-thirds are based on the initiatives that we've implemented in our hotels.

Okay. That makes, that makes sounds good. And then…

Let me, let me, if I could just to add to that. So, we’ve spent a lot of time and money reinvesting in our brands. And so those numbers -- we're seeing benefits currently, as we share with you. But we expect that to be at least a midterm benefit based on the investment that we’ve made and where the brands are today. So, Sleep, obviously being the dominant brand in the midscale segment, and we think Comfort will assume a relatively similar position in the upper midscale. And we’re pretty confident that that’s a going forward at least through the mid-term. And then based on the other activities that we’ve got including our program where we are providing switch privileges special rates. We that’s going to not only continue to grow our share, but we also think it's going to improve the profitability of our franchisees because they’re going to act that we’re going to acquire those customers at a much lesser cost.

It makes sense. And then just on your balance sheet and your cash flow. I mean you’re going to -- your guidance suggests that EBITDA is going to grow 15% next year. Respecting the fact that you're going to be investing Cambria, you increased your regular dividend a little bit. I assume it will continue to buyback. It still seems like your leverage is coming down quite significantly. I mean could you potentially do another special dividend or be more aggressive on buyback. How you think about capital returns? Thank you.

As we’ve always said, we look to maximize shareholder value and we will view all of the options on the table. But at this point in time, we think that our cash flow mainly view to support Cambria investment to continue to get that brand growing. But we certainly evaluate all options then and it something that makes sense, we would consider doing that.

And then our general philosophy is obviously return to shareholders is our priority always. But at the same time, we’ll also generate a lot of cash. And as a result, we know that we want to keep our leverage levels up. And so, the way to think about it is, if we have opportunities to do inorganic growth or opportunities to return to shareholders, it's going to be based on the value of those to the Company and to the shareholders. There is our first priority return capital to shareholders always, but we’re also looking for opportunities to grow which why you see the investment in Cambria. And the nice thing about our position is, we want to maintain the leverage levels that we’re at. So, we’re going to look for opportunities to do that.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Jeff Donnelly with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open.

Back on the just a market share question. I'm curious, are you seeing any acceleration or commercially erosion in that pace of index gain that you’ve seen in the past I think the 27 quarters or is that gain in pretty steady?

Yes, I think we view it as pretty steady. It's significant and we are obviously assuming it's going to carry through into 2017, but we are not seeing it change, we're seeing relative to the same level of pace over in terms of the incremental over the competition and so our view is borrowing something else that we are not anticipating, we're going to at least maintain those levels and we've got a lot of other things that we we're revenue working on that we believe could build on it.

You might have answered my next question I was just curious how much of that 3% to 4% RevPAR growth outlook you have for 2017. How much of do you think is driven by the continuation of that index gain versus maybe you just have a more optimistic sort of baseline view of travel demand, say, versus your completion this year?

Actually, the way we do it is the way almost everyone else do, we take the blue-chip forecast and then we add our premium to it that's how we got to the number.

Sounds good. And then just one last question on SkyTouch, I was just trying to think about different outcomes there and maybe in more of the barriers outcome. If you ultimately find that SkyTouch does not get attraction in outside of the Choice system, do you think it could continue to operate on a breakeven or even profitable basis?

The answer to that is yes.

Thank you. And our next question comes from Robin Farley with UBS. Your line is now open.

Great. Two questions. One is one the unit growth for the year came in the F1 0.6. And you had kind of been guiding to up about 2% and technically it does around to 2%, but I'm wondering if it's kind of in the low end of maybe what range that what would have suggested? Was it just some opening or just kind of slipped into Q1 or will there more removals in Q4 that kind of made the net number go a little bit lower? And then I have another question as well.

Yes, predominantly the unit growth was around timing of conversion opening. So, if you look at our pipeline, our actual conversion pipeline is up 10% and some of that is not only due to the increase sales, but some others hotels that we thought would open late December are pushed into January.

Part of that is also driven by our strategy of we're now requiring a higher level of improvement to the property before we convert, and that has moved the conversion time table back to somewhat. And so, it is an outcome of our demanding better hotels for our customers. That is not obviously where we've got an increase in opportunity from the pipeline, but the time to conversion has increased a little bit.

If we think about maybe 50 basis points of your unit growth into that shifting into '17 from '16 just with that sort of longer investment period. Would that actually suggest that your growth rate is actually pretty similar like that I'm just thinking about -- you're talking about the reasons that it might accelerate. But it looks like if you weren’t for maybe that sort of similar opening slipping into 2017 you would be close to 2% in both years. Is that fair?

If you think about our conversion pipeline and moves through the system pretty quickly, so a lot of times we sell contracts that don’t even show up in our pipeline because conversions open is quickly as three months for some brands, and as long as six months. So, a lot of it's our unit growth is more predicated on what we think we're going to sell in our franchise development in 2017. And so, we do believe as that will be at a higher level than our 2016 results. So, I don’t -- I wouldn’t characterize the fact that few of our units moved into our opening in 2017 as a well over unit growth than originally thought for 2017.

And if you look at the numbers, you’d say, okay, excluding the Comfort impact, we're at 4.5. So even if we took your 50 bps, we'd be at 4, which is a lot higher than last year. So, we are accelerating.

And then the other question is just how to think about Easter impact just since you have so much leisure business. Is Easter shifting into Q2 helping or hurting Q1 for you? It's obviously a lot more clear for business travel that Easter should what that means, but I’ve just trying to think about for leisure travel whether that’s hurting or helping your Q1?

No, it definitely helps Q1, and we’re expecting a strong Q1 we had a strong start, it is continuing and then that technical reason will even boost those results further.

Okay, great. And so a part of that question was probably a lot of why Q1 was higher than the full year guidance, I just want to clarify that -- they were some additional basis

That’s correct.

[Operator Instructions] And our next question comes from David Katz with Telsey Group. Your line is now open.

The questions and answers so far have been really fulsome, but on the subject of capital allocation and this may seem out of left field, but is there any prospect that you would launch any sort of additional strap on businesses like SkyTouch? Are there any others that are in the planning or analysis stage to sort of broaden your business anyway? Is that a potential allocation of capital in the future?

Never say never, but right now what we’re focused on is launching the vacation rental business which is where our investment is going. And so we’re very focused on that, we want to make sure that has a robust pipeline and growth to it and so far the results were pretty good. And then, we’re also obviously in the marketplace there is a lot of activity and we’re looking at every opportunity that coming up. So we’re spending some money from that perspective. We are always going to look for other opportunities to do what we view as adjacent businesses that take our skill sets and we can apply those in our technologies in the businesses. So for example we are going to deliver sometime this year the first state-of-the-art reservation system that’s been build in the last 30 to 40 years. The capability of that obviously opens up, lots of new potential opportunities, probably several years down the road though because we want to get that stabilized and working in the right and exactly the way we want it, we wanted to allow us to expand our capabilities technologically which will help our upscale brands as well. And so we’re doing a lot of things and are going to create opportunities, but right now we’re focused on the vacation rental, we’re focused on inorganic growth opportunities as they come up. We’re happy where SkyTouch is, we’re going to continue to examine alternatives for that and we’re going to continue by the way we didn’t mention to pursue Tier-1 brands, we just have not landed one yet obviously. And so as we think about it, overtime will probably look at other business opportunities but I would say that’s probably out of reason to the mid-term.

Right, if I can follow that up just a bit, if you could just talk about just in generally speaking the notion of in a buying an addition business versus launching one, which we observe and one of the factors in that is just a length of reptile that can take towards the profitability and then true productivity. How do you think about or how have you thought about that sort of launch versus buy option, given the financials that you have? Right, you have the money.

Having done both, I can tell you, obviously the length of time it takes to develop a new brand is significantly above what it takes to take an existing platform and put our scales to grow it. So, the issue for us though is, we are in a very strong position, we are a very disciplined potential buyer and so the returns or buying that platform need to be along the lines where our shareholders expect. And so, we don’t believe that we need to do anything to have a very strong growth story. So, we’re a very -- we are a very aggressive discipline reviewer of opportunities. We’ve seen some that we like, but they didn’t come to fruition. And we’re going to do continue to do that, but we’re going to do it in a way that provides real value to our shareholders in the near-term. And so say we will continue to see and examine that, we are an active looker of opportunities that are out there. If you look at the market you will know that there is a number of things that are potentials. So, while we don’t have anything at all to report, we believe that adding to our platform because of our infrastructure is built to absorb a significant number of hotels without having to add to the cost which is why our margins are what they are that we continue to look for opportunities to add to that platform. And if we buy them at the right price, we like the idea of starting with an existing platform to grow from versus starting another brand. And so, we will continue to invest in Cambria obviously. And when we feel that Cambria is gotten to the point where we no longer requires the kind of investment that we’re putting in now, which is probably the midterm from the standpoint. We’ll look at potentially watching another brand, but we will continue also look for opportunities of existing platforms that we think fit well with our inventory and that we can grow significantly.

Thank you. And I'm showing no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Steve Joyce for closing remarks.

Okay. Well, thanks again for joining us. As always we appreciate your interest in Choice Hotels. And that concludes our call for today.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for your participation in today's conference. This does conclude the program. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.