Greetings, and welcome to the Cognex Corporation Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone requires operator assistance during the conference, a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Greer Aviv, Head of Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin. Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. Our earnings release was published yesterday after market close and our annual report on Form 10-K for 2025 was filed this morning. The earnings materials are available on our Investor Relations website. I am joined here today by Matt Moschner, our CEO, and Dennis Fehr, our CFO. In addition to our usual operational update, we will provide a strategic update highlighting the completed strategic portfolio review, our ongoing operating model transformation, and an update to our financial framework. After prepared remarks, we will open the lines for Q&A. Both our published materials and the call today will reference non-GAAP measures. You can find a reconciliation of certain items from GAAP to non-GAAP in our press release and earnings presentation. Today’s earnings materials will contain forward-looking statements, including statements regarding our expectations. Our actual results may differ from our projections due to the risks and uncertainties that are described in our SEC filings including our most recent Form 10-K. With that, I will turn the call over to Matt. Thanks, Greer. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today.

2025 marked a return to profitable growth for Cognex Corporation. With constant currency revenue growth of 8% year over year, and adjusted EPS growth of 38%. We built momentum throughout the year advancing our strategic objectives while staying focused on long-term value creation. Logistics continued to deliver steady growth, along with strong year-end spending across many of our factory automation end markets. Let us start with an update on our strategy. Turning to page four of our earnings presentation. We made great progress in 2025 against each of our three primary strategic objectives. First, we remain committed to leading in AI for industrial machine vision. With nearly a decade of experience in this area, we are building cutting-edge tools that unlock new applications and dramatically simplify the user experience. With our talent and proven track record of delivering breakthrough technology, we are uniquely positioned to win in the AI era. During 2025, we introduced several transformative capabilities that strengthen our AI technology leadership. In January, we introduced the DataMan 290, helping us win share in the competitive ID factory automation market with new AI-enabled auto-setup and advanced code filtering. In March, we launched our In-Sight 8,900, which brings the power of embedded AI to OEM customers. In June, we announced OneVision, bringing deep learning and edge learning together on a single cloud platform and creating new models deployable to embedded systems at the edge. And in October, we introduced SLX, our new solutions experience product line that brings our latest AI vision tools to logistics customers. These product launches strengthen our position within $3.2 billion of our $7.0 billion served market, using cutting-edge AI capabilities to deliver greater value for customers and, in the process, gain market share. Second, we remain focused on delivering the best customer experience in our…

Dennis?

Thanks, Matt.

Let me start with walking through the adjusted EBITDA margin progression in 2025 before I discuss where we go from here. Turning to page seven of the earnings presentation. The margin progression from 2024 to 2025. We ended 2025 with an adjusted EBITDA margin of 20.7%, excluding the onetime benefit from the commercial partnership. We achieved our first milestone, reaching greater than 20%, a full year ahead of plan, driven by focused execution and strong cost discipline. As we shared at Investor Day last June, our largest lever for driving bottom-line profitability is OpEx efficiency, which is where I want to begin. Over the past year, we have been laser-focused on driving organizational efficiencies throughout Cognex Corporation. We achieved $33 million of gross cost reduction, which was partially offset by $11 million of incentive comp dollars, $4 million of FX headwinds, and $10 million of wage adjustments, resulting in a net reduction of $8 million. Regarding COGS productivity and pricing, we saw 2024 pricing headwinds, especially in China, are fully reflected in the 2025 P&L and are partially offset by favorable volume change. Organic mix was favorable for the year. However, we do not anticipate the full extent of this favorability to recur in 2026. Taken together, we are pleased with the progress made this year on adjusted EBITDA margin expansion. And as Matt mentioned, we will execute additional initiatives in 2026 as we work toward our next milestone. Moving to page eight. Building on the actions already completed, we are setting our next milestone at a 25% adjusted EBITDA margin, targeted on a run-rate basis by the end of 2026. The path to 25% is anchored in three key levers. First, OpEx efficiency. We expect to realize an additional $35 million to $40 million of identified net cost reductions, excluding FX, in 2026. Second, organic mix. The announced portfolio optimization will improve mix and partially offset the nonrecurring favorability seen in 2025. And third, COGS productivity and pricing. With 2024 pricing headwinds fully reflected in the P&L, and ending 2025 with pricing stability, we are well positioned to turn pricing into a tailwind. Turning to Page nine. Considering our strong momentum of margin expansion, we are updating the financial framework we introduced at our Investor Day. We are raising our through-cycle adjusted EBITDA margin range to 25% to 31% from the prior 20% to 30%. Our through-cycle revenue CAGR remains 13% to 14% and we continue to expect greater than 100% free cash flow conversion. This updated financial framework reflects our

execution.

And durability of the margin expansion we are driving. As we further progress on our margin expansion journey, we will continue to evaluate our margin ambitions and will update this framework accordingly. Let us turn to the operational update with our financial results. I will begin with a review of our fourth quarter results followed by an update on our performance for the full year. Starting with the financial highlights of the fourth quarter, Page 11 details our performance on three key financial metrics. One, adjusted EBITDA margin was 22.7%, representing an increase of 420 basis points year over year, the sixth consecutive quarter of year-over-year expansion.

Two,

adjusted EPS increased 35% year over year, the sixth consecutive quarter of year-over-year double-digit EPS growth. And three, our trailing twelve-month free cash flow conversion rate reached 138%, meeting our target of greater than 100% for the fifth consecutive quarter. Our disciplined focus on cost management and profitable growth ensured that this quarter’s strong revenue performance translated into meaningful EPS growth and robust free cash flow. Turning to the income statement on page 12. Revenue increased 10% year over year and 9% on a constant currency basis. Looking at the geographic revenue trends on a year-over-year constant currency basis, Americas revenue expanded 11%, led by strong end-of-year demand in packaging and continued growth in logistics. Europe grew 13%, driven by strength in packaging. Greater China revenue increased 7%, driven by growth in consumer electronics and semiconductor. Other Asia revenue was flat in the quarter, as growth from the consumer electronics supply chain shift was offset by semiconductor against a very strong comparable. Staying on Page 12. Adjusted operating expenses increased 5% year over year and 2% on a constant currency basis, reflecting ongoing cost discipline offset by incentive compensation headwinds in the quarter. Looking forward, as we continue to drive cost efficiencies across the organization and incentive compensation already reset in 2025, we are confident to achieve the OpEx reductions discussed earlier and continue strong margin expansion in 2026. Driven by revenue growth and favorable mix, adjusted EBITDA margin reached 22.7%, well above the upper end of our guidance range. GAAP diluted earnings per share were $0.19, up 18% from a year ago. Adjusted diluted EPS was $0.27, representing 35% year-over-year growth. This strong EPS performance was driven by robust revenue growth, disciplined cost management, and a lower diluted share count compared to last year. In the fourth quarter, we…

Thanks, Dennis. Let us review current trends across our key end markets as shown on Page 15. Please note that my discussion on 2025 end market performance excludes the onetime benefit from the commercial partnership. Although the macroeconomic backdrop remains uneven and geopolitical uncertainty persists, in 2025, we saw momentum in consumer electronics, logistics, and packaging. Automotive remained soft. Starting with logistics. 2025 was another very strong year, with double-digit revenue growth led by large e-commerce customers. We are driving strong adoption of our standardized machine vision tunnel and layering new vision applications on top of code reading, increasing the ROI for customers. Looking ahead to 2026, after two years of outsized growth we expect more moderate growth in the mid- to high-single-digit range. Longer term, we believe logistics can be our fastest growing vertical with growth in the mid-teens through cycle. Next, let us talk about packaging. Packaging delivered solid high single-digit revenue growth in 2025. As a large underpenetrated and less cyclical market it remains a priority. Our Salesforce transformation and AI-enabled product ecosystem position us to capture incremental opportunities and deepen penetration. For 2026, we expect mid- to high-single-digit growth as we bring more machine vision into packaging. Turning to consumer electronics. Revenue grew double digits in 2025 as the market emerged from a prolonged down cycle. We see continued upside from ongoing supply chain shifts, new device form factors, and a consumer refresh cycle. For 2026, we expect high single- to double-digit growth driven by a continuation of these trends. Next is automotive. The automotive market remained challenging in 2025, with revenue down high single digits, in line with our expectations. Looking at the sequential development, we believe the market has reached a bottom and expect 2026 to be flat to low single-digit growth. Longer term, we see attractive opportunities for additional penetration as customers prioritize improving vehicle quality and reducing operating costs. Finally, in semiconductor, 2025 revenue grew mid-single digits ahead of our expectations. For 2026, we expect back-half weighted growth with full-year expansion in the mid-single- to double-digit range, supported by the AI-driven investment cycle and reinforcing our confidence in this market. Our deep relationships with leading semiconductor equipment manufacturers position us well for continued growth. Let me pass the call back to Dennis to discuss our outlook.

Dennis? Thanks, Matt. Moving to page 16. I will now review our financial guidance for the first quarter. In Q1, we expect revenue to be between $235 million and $255 million, representing growth of approximately 13% at the midpoint against a weak comp. Adjusted EBITDA margin is expected to be between 19%–22%, with the midpoint representing an increase of 370 basis points year over year. As discussed previously, please note that Q1 2025 OpEx benefited from FX and stock-based comp tailwinds that will not repeat this year. Adjusted earnings per share are expected to be between $0.22 and $0.26, with the midpoint of this range representing 50% year-over-year growth. In summary, 2025 marks a year of substantial turnaround, with our top line growing organically and our margins expanding, both for the first time since 2021. We exited 2025 with strong momentum across most of our end markets, and that strength has continued into 2026. As a short-cycle business, we have limited visibility and we therefore remain focused on our priorities, including continued disciplined cost management, a streamlined portfolio, and transforming our operating model. These actions position us to drive profitable growth, maximize free cash flow, and allocate capital with rigor to create long-term shareholder value. By the numbers, we are targeting a 25% adjusted EBITDA margin run rate exiting 2026 and at least 20% adjusted EPS growth, underscoring our ambition to significantly expand bottom-line profitability. Now Matt and I are ready for your questions. Operator, please go ahead.

Thank you. The floor is now open for questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star 1 on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate that your line is in the question queue. You may press star 2 if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up the handset before pressing the star keys. We do ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Again, that is star 1 to register a question at this time. First question is going to be from Joseph Craig Giordano of TD Cowen. Please go ahead.

Good morning. This is Michael on for Joe. Hi, Michael. Good morning.

Thank you. Thank you for taking my question. Just a two-parter here. So just

wanted to dive a bit deeper on the $22 million revenue divestments. Could you just frame out the timing of when this should be expected? And you know, how is that, you know, if that is included in the guide, as well. And then just have a quick follow-up to that.

Yep. No. Happy to do that. So maybe first, focusing, like, key takeaway on here. Right? It is really all about focusing on noncore or getting out noncore product lines, which do not have growth or low growth, and which have low margins. So in that regard, it is really focusing on improving the revenue mix and helping in that regard to offset some of the onetime favorability we have seen in 2025. The majority of that revenue which we are exiting is related to that Japan-focused trading business which we acquired along with Moritex. We are currently expecting to close that transaction by the end of, or within, the second quarter. So that means you would start to see that in the second half of this year. Keep in mind that exiting that revenue will change a bit the mix of the end market. Right? So the majority of that revenue would come out of the packaging vertical, and a smaller portion would come out of the logistics vertical. So in that regard, keep in mind when you model to reduce these two verticals, whereas the growth expectations Matt stated, or the initial view on these growth expectations in these vertical markets, basically would remain unchanged on that lower base.

Great. That is helpful. And just a quick follow-up to that. Can you just give us a better understanding how the company determines what is considered core versus noncore. For instance, like, things like Edge Intelligence were a highlight of the Investor Day a couple years ago. So just would love to better understand the framing behind these priorities. Thank you.

Yeah. Thanks, Michael. Yeah. This is Matt. This is a process that we started almost a year ago as we really thought about where do we have advantage. Right? We start with where do we have core IP, core skill, you know, a deeper understanding of a certain application area is really the foundation of what we would define as core. And then, you know, we look at other financial metrics that Dennis mentioned, really, what is the size of that market, what is the growth potential, what is the relative profit pool, profitability, and our ability to capture those profits. You put those things together, and you put them really in the context of each other, as part of a portfolio of

activities,

and, you know, I think what you quickly see are those that, you know, a, we have maybe a stronger right to win, and then, b, perhaps a weaker financial trajectory. So that is how we did it. Right? We have a pretty clear framework as to how we do that. And I think you are seeing the results of that work from last year in these results.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Joe Ritchie of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Good morning. Hey. Good morning. So

yes, so my first question is on the cost reduction program for 2026. Dennis, maybe as you kind of think through the bridge for EBITDA margin expansion for the year, what are kind of the offsets we should be thinking about for 2026 to this cost reduction plan? And then also, how do you see that progressing as the year goes along?

Yeah. No. Absolutely, Joe. So, right, I mean, we mentioned at the Investor Day last year that the largest lever is OpEx efficiency. And I think we really followed through on that in 2025 as we outlined in the walk for 2025. And then that enabled us at the end to hit the greater than 20% adjusted EBITDA milestone a full year ahead of

time.

Now looking at 2026, clearly, it is, again, the largest lever which we have. And then coming to your question, basically, what would be offsetting effects? It is on the mix side. Right? So I mentioned in the prepared remarks that we saw favorable, call it, onetime effects in mix in 2025. You are partially reducing that headwind with the portfolio optimization which we do, but it is not fully offsetting that. So really the headwind which we see is on the mix side. And then we would see perhaps, as we mentioned as well, some favorability from pricing, but I would say that it is probably really a smaller piece of the equation. Really think big picture about 2026. It is more OpEx efficiency partially offset by mix.

Got it. That is helpful, Dennis. And then, Matt, just a question for you. Look. It seems like you are getting a lot of traction on your customer growth initiative. And it sounds like lead generation is certainly improving. Can you just maybe double click on what has changed over the last six to twelve months? And then as we move forward, you know, seems like you are seeing a lot of that opportunity on the packaging side of the business. Would you expect that to maybe broaden across your other end markets as well? Yeah, Joe. Happy to. Yeah. No. For sure, we are seeing great momentum in our ability to acquire new customers. I would maybe take a step back. In these earnings, we really wanted to showcase the work we have been doing on our Salesforce transformation. And I really cannot overstate how significant of a transformation that is to our go-to-market. There is really four pillars, as we highlighted on the slides, which is it is a brand-new organization. Right? What we had was more of a fragmented structure where we have combined and standardized how we structure our teams around the world. That has been huge in terms of driving productivity, segmentation of activities, and cross-selling. The second is process. Right? We have made huge investments over the last many years in business systems to really kind of digitize Cognex Corporation. We are seeing those pay off as we are able to arm our sales team with better data, better leads, better prospecting tools, better lead conversion metrics. So process is key, and we are, again, standardizing those with things like dashboards and things you would expect. Product. Right? We have been working hard on our product portfolio and we use this word ecosystem. And…

Thank you. The next question is coming from Jamie Cook of Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. I guess two questions. One, just on the organic top-line assumptions for 2026. Dennis, if you could provide any color, it looks like we should expect sort of mid- to high-single-digit growth organically. But I guess, the bigger question within that is with some of the success that you are seeing on the Salesforce transformation, you talked about adding 9,000 customers in 2025 versus ’20 versus 3,000. I do not remember what, when that was. But just are we starting to factor in more market outgrowth, and should we do that 2026 given some of the successes? And then I guess my second question just back on the portfolio optimization and the announcements you have made this quarter, I mean, where are you in this process? Is this, like, the first inning of the ballgame and there is more to come? Or we feel like we have, you know, fully identified sort of the noncore low-growth product lines? Thank you.

Yes. Thanks, Jamie. Let me start with your first question. So maybe first, let me clarify. Right? We are not providing a full-year guidance. I think what we try, in the sense, in the spirit of providing transparency to the investor community, we try to provide a view from today’s angle based on data which we have available. Right? So we talked on the last earnings call about, like, hey, what are PMI data suggesting? And it certainly continues looking both at data which we are seeing in our business as well as macro factors. So in that regard, I would say we are certainly encouraged by what we have been seeing towards the end of the year 2025, where we saw that strong year-end demand. And some of that turned into revenue in the first quarter in 2026 and helps with basically that growth in the first quarter against the weak comp. So and at the same time, we also saw some PMI uptick happening just in January. So these are certainly encouraging data points. But at the same time, clearly, I want to say, these are not yet a trend. Right? So in that regard, we keep mindful about what we see and that we certainly would want to see certain more data points to either update our view to perhaps the high single digits, and in that regard, I would say kind of that mid-single- to high-single-digit range is kind of what we would say from today’s perspective. But, again, we are a short-cycle business. Things can change fast. So we want to provide kind of a continuous update on what we see, but it is by no means a full-year guide.

Yeah. No. I would, Jamie, if you allow me to take the second one, which is where are we, particularly as it relates to the portfolio optimization. I would say these things do not happen overnight. We really have been working on this since almost a year ago, even well before the CEO transition, where we put teams in place to really look hard at the portfolio and I think we took a very thoughtful and rigorous approach to that. And you are seeing the fruits of that work. And so in that vein, I would say we are very much sort of at the end of that cycle of analysis. And I think you are seeing the announcements of those ideas. So yes, as it relates to the portfolio analysis. That said, I think as a products-oriented company, there is always work to do in making sure that your portfolio is fit for purpose and that it lets you run the company efficiently. There probably is more work we have to do just generally speaking on cleaning up things like SKUs that really do not need to exist and eliminating complexity in other areas. I consider that more just work to be done and less of sort of a strategic thing that we did. And so you might see the effects of that trickle out through the rest of the year. But as it relates to the portfolio optimization, I think what we are announcing today is towards the end of that process.

Great. Thank you.

The next question is coming from Andrew Edouard Buscaglia of BNP Paribas. Hi. Good morning, guys. This is Brooke on for Andrew. Was wondering if you could go a little bit deeper into the end markets. You mentioned momentum in logistics and consumer electronics. For CE, what is kind of driving the demand there? I know you mentioned a refresh cycle, maybe some form factor on new devices. And for logistics, momentum, is that currently more greenfield or brownfield? If you could just give a little bit more detail into what you have been seeing in the conversations you have been having.

Yeah. Sure. Hey, Brooke. Thanks for joining us. Yeah. I will go deeper on CE and logistics. For sure. Consumer electronics, as we really started to highlight at the tail end of last year, I think we are seeing encouraging growth trends and really more broad based and that is certainly exciting. And I think consumer electronics as an industry plays very much to our strengths in technology. These are very demanding applications that require precision and the highest levels of quality given that many of these devices are quite expensive and have high price points in the market. And so we see a lot of those customers, both end users, the product owners, as well as the systems integrators, really favor Cognex Corporation. But there is, you know, there is many underlying trends that are supporting that growth. Certainly, the shifts in the supply chain outside of the traditional manufacturing locations of China to Greater Asia, ASEAN, India, even other parts of the world. And given the global company that we are, I think we remain a strong partner to enable those geographic shifts as they happen. New vision capabilities, we brought to market some pretty transformational AI tools last year, specifically designed for consumer electronics. I think we are seeing those play out nicely. Consumer demand. Right? Consumer demand is very strong for these sorts of devices currently. A lot of that is driven by some of the new AI features that are being brought to consumer devices that are very exciting and driving maybe a refresh cycle that we have not seen for many years. And then last but certainly not least, we are seeing new form factors. Again, particularly as consumers want to interact with the latest AI software tools, we are seeing technology providers really…

Yeah. Thank you. That was super helpful. And then just to follow-up, just an update going into 2026 on your capital allocation priorities. Your free cash flow has been very strong. Is there any update on M&A or acquisition targets?

I, yeah. See, in general, the capital allocation priorities remain unchanged versus what we presented at Investor Day. Certainly, we are very pleased with the strong cash flow generation which we had, especially in 2025, 77% up. What is really driven on the one side by driving bottom-line profitability, at the same time also by optimizing the working capital. Now looking forward, I would say probably right where we are, where we want to be on working capital. Right? So cash conversion cycle somewhere in that 150 to 155 days, really where we feel like it is a really good point for us as Cognex Corporation. So in that regard, probably we will see a bit less of contribution to the free cash flow from working capital

capital

optimization. And then at the same time, we think we can definitely still achieve the greater than 100% free cash flow conversion rate within 2026. So in that regard, still looking forward to a strong year of cash conversion, but more rooted in margin expansion than in working capital reduction. And, yeah, clearly, similar capital allocation priorities than previously communicated.

Okay. Thanks for the update.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Ken Newman of KeyBanc Capital Markets.

Congrats.

On the solid execution this quarter.

Hey, thanks, Scott. First,

hey, thanks. Maybe first question for you guys. Dennis, it does not seem like you guys are seeing any impact from higher memory costs, but I just wanted to clarify if there is any cost increases that are embedded within the guide, and maybe just if you could remind us

the percent of COGS memory intensity.

Yeah. Thanks, Ken. We do not disclose specifics around memory pricing, but I would say we do not expect any material impact from increased pricing tied to those supply chain issues. I would say we are pretty good at managing this. We really put teams in place many years ago when we saw a tightening of the supply chains on the tail end of COVID. We had some supply chain issues ourselves that have really forced us to double down and take many steps into our supply chain. And I think our ability to manage disruptions like this is really very strong, I would say world-class. We have great relationships with our suppliers and we keep very close to what they are seeing in the market. And so I would not say that we are seeing increased memory prices affecting our business. We are seeing them. And I would say I am not going to really give what percentage of memory is our bill of material, but I would say it is not an overly significant portion. And I would not say that we have experienced really any material procurement issues today. So we will keep an eye on it. But at this point, I think we feel comfortable that we have the tools to manage it and that it is already reflected adequately in our forward guidance.

Got it. Thanks, Matt. That is very helpful.

And then for my follow-up here, just wanted to clarify. Is there any way to help us think about the cadence of how we should expect to realize that $35 to $40 million of cost benefits? Is that just an equal-weighted type of benefit through the year, or does some of that hit a little heavier in the first half?

Yeah. No. Fully understand the question. So clearly, we are focusing on executing a good majority of that in 2026. So that means we would start to see some of these effects show up more towards Q3 of this year, and then perhaps a smaller portion towards the end of this year. In that regard, yeah, start to look for effects in the third quarter. And in general, I think as mentioned before, that really would set us then up for this adjusted EBITDA run rate of 25%. And maybe let me elaborate a little bit more on that one. So first, it is very clearly a run rate as we exit 2026. It is not a full-year number. Right? So in that regard, it is probably pretty much what we have been saying before about how we think about margin expansion in 2026. I think, really, the message we want to give is that there is durability and that we have confidence in the margin expansion and that this will continue and can continue also into 2027. In that regard, take that comment mostly about, like, 2027 can have another increase or another year of margin expansion and that we are not done in 2026.

Great. Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question is coming from Tommy Moll of Stephens. Please go ahead.

Good morning and thank you for taking my questions.

Hi, Tommy. Hey, Tommy.

Automotive looks like it is going to move from red to green in 2026, which is nice to see. What context can you give us there, in particular by geography, maybe starting with North America? Just the latest and greatest on the demand side and the conversations you are having. Thank you.

Yeah. Sure. As you mentioned, Tommy, as we have said before, you know, it is very much a geographic story. And that story tells differently in each area. So you ask about the U.S. and the Americas. What I would say is I would characterize it as an area where we are seeing relatively more activity and strength. Right? We are having good discussions with all the major OEMs. You would have seen them really try to cleanse their P&Ls of previous investments in EVs. And I think that is giving them flexibility to really think about the next iteration of powertrains. And those next generations are both perhaps a different powertrain, but also certainly a more connected car. And so, yeah, we are having those discussions with them, and there is quite a bit of activity that we are seeing start to come back in the U.S. Maybe if you do not mind, I will move on to Europe and Asia. In Europe, for sure, it is where we see the greatest level of weakness, and where the recovery seems to be slower. In Europe, just to build on some of my prior comments, we are shifting our sales activity to other verticals in Europe so that we can compensate for that weakness. But nonetheless, that is where it is. And in Asia, it is a bit mixed. I would say it is very much OEM dependent, whether you are talking about the Japanese OEMs, the Korean OEMs, the Chinese OEMs. And so we are staying close to all of them. And I would say both their investment levels, their powertrain choices, you know, are different. So we are trying to keep Asia as a bit more mixed. And hopefully, we can provide some more clarity as the year goes on. Hopefully, that is helpful, Tommy.

Yes. Thank you, Matt.

Dennis, I wanted to ask about the raised through-cycle EBITDA margin expectation.

Several

percentage points, if I just look at the midpoint from your

Investor Day versus the update you provided us today. If

we think about the bridging items there, is it as simple as

you gave us three bullets under transforming the operating model that

net to the $35 to $40 million annualized. Is that the bridge? Or are there other operational changes that you have made to give confidence in that raised

through-cycle expectation?

I mean, yeah, I think the bridge is really what we showed at Investor Day, so we are not really changing compared to what we said at Investor Day. Our strongest lever is the OpEx efficiency. And, right, we provided a target value for each of these buckets, and we are striving to achieve those. I think really what has had us change versus Investor Day is that we reached our first milestone. Right? And I think as a company, as a leadership team, we are quite encouraged that we achieved our first milestone a full year ahead of time, and that basically kind of drove us now to say, like, let us take a look at the next milestone. So in that regard, nothing changed in the bridge in the way how we want to get there. It is really all about having hit the first milestone, and let us look at the second milestone. And the key levers to achieve the second milestone is really the cost optimization which we have announced combined with the portfolio optimization as well. Yeah. And, Tommy, I would just say,

you know, anytime you think about being more efficient, reducing costs, it is easy to say, oh, you are just taking capacity out. And there were elements of that, right, where maybe we would have invested in capacity a little too far ahead of growth. But the other two areas that you have to look at are portfolio. We are doing that. You are seeing those as artifacts in today’s earnings. But the biggest and the hardest is changing the operating model. And I think if you just read the newspaper, there is just so many opportunities to be more efficient, be more productive. And that is really, I would say, where we go next and where you start to see more outsized benefits on efficiency over the longer term, right, where you can be more productive and automate more and do things more efficiently. And I think as an AI-first organization, I think we are embracing, I would say, a lot of the state of the art that is happening, not just in how you engineer products and do software development, but how do you interact with customers and how do you generate leads and how do you provide excellent tech support in more efficient ways. And so I think on that end, when it comes to operating model efficiency, we are probably earlier in our journey. And so you put those three things together and I think we have a lot of conviction, at least the 2026 numbers, that we are just, rest assured, that we are not settling. We are continuing to think about the longer term and how we would be a more productive, efficient organization.

Thank you both. I will turn it back. Thanks, Tom.

Our next question is coming from Piyush Avasthy of Citi.

Good morning, guys.

Congrats on the great quarter.

Thanks. Just following up on the last question, like,

you know, the AI-assisted coding for software development, like, you know, I know, like, at your Investor Day, you kind of had talked about R&D being like a lower, you know, going to low teens as a percentage of sales from like close to mid-teens that you reported in ’25. But seems you are, like, this integration can really help you reduce the timeline to lower the R&D. Is that true or we should not get that too excited yet?

If you just let me, let me give you a, bear with me, I am going to give you a longer-run answer. You know, Cognex Corporation, you know, we take pride in our customers expect from us market-leading technology and capability, and we will continue to deliver that. And, you know, our ability to move the market and invent is very much driven by our investment in our world-class engineering organization. And so, you know, I do not want anyone to misconstrue the comments that I am about to make as us retreating from that objective, because I think we really want to be the gold standard and push the market forward to be the best in the emerging technologies that we know can help industrial machine vision. But for sure, you know, there are just so many ways to be more efficient and more productive when it comes to technical design. And that is not just software. I would say it is also hardware, and we are pushing on both. But we are years into using these tools, particularly as you mentioned on the software AI-assisted coding angle, and as we all see from the headlines and recent news announcements, those tools just keep getting better. We have an organization and a culture that embraces change and particularly as it relates to advanced AI, I would say. And so, yeah, we are, and we are doing it, I think, in the right way.

Because

we need to make sure that when we ship products, they have the utmost quality and security. And so there is a fine line you have to balance on all these things. But I think we are fully utilizing. I think it is still early days in terms of what the full potential is, and it is not just about software. I think it is really full stack. How we design and how we do more with the same or maybe slightly less heading into the future.

Got it. Very helpful. And this is following up on Jamie’s question. Like, your 2026 view, again, you guys said, like, mid-single-digit to high-single-digit range. But if I look at your Q1 2026 top-line guidance, you are kind of suggesting 13% top-line growth. So are there any larger projects or one-timers in Q1 that is helping growth in the quarter? And do you expect the growth to decelerate as we move through the year, or is it just the limited visibility and you guys are being a little bit more prudent? Yeah. No. I understand the question, Piyush. I think two things. On the one side, Q1 is still driven by some of the year-end spending we saw in 2025. That means just like revenue comes into the first quarter instead of being recognized in the fourth quarter. And then I really want to say that keep in mind that Q1 2025 was a weak quarter where we saw at that time a lot of logistics demand being pulled forward into Q4 2024. In that regard, that is a bit like this mix that this time we see kind of a reverse of shifting from quarter to quarter. Right? So last year, it was moved from Q1 into Q4, and this time, we see moves from Q4 into Q1. And that makes this 13% probably look a little bit larger than what it is. So in that regard, not expect things like, hey, there is a deceleration of things, but clearly, there is kind of this underlying timing effect, which kind of

maybe

may make it look like that. But in general, we will have our typical seasonality with Q2 and Q3 driven by consumer electronics, so stronger quarters there. Then certainly, we cannot say how we think about Q4 this year, whether we would see a similar effect on year-end spending like this Q1 2025. That is just much too early to talk about that. So in that regard, it comes back to what I said before. We certainly are encouraged by that spending, by seeing the PMI coming up. But let us see more data. Let us see more data points. Let us see more trends. And at the same time, we will control what we can control, and that is our cost basis and our portfolio. And going hard after these topics, and that gives us the confidence in our margin expansion. Appreciate all the color, guys. Good luck.

Thanks, guys. Thanks.

Thank you. The next question is coming from Guy Drummond Hardwick of Barclays. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning and congratulations on the

on the great results.

Looking at your outlook, your initial outlook slide for 2026, looks like on a weighted average basis,

your end market growth is sort of

mid- to high-single digits. First off, is that fair? And I apologize because I joined the call late, but the $22 million of divestments, is any of that reflected in the Q1 guidance? And how should we be treating that as excluding, as net of organic growth for this year? Or like a business divestment?

Yeah. So a few thoughts here, Guy. So first, yeah, probably like that mid-single to high-single digit is a fair statement on an initial view. I said earlier in the call, again, we are a short-cycle business, all driven by what we see today. That view could change. PMIs could change. Data could change. Business trajectory could change. So it is not a guide. It is just a view of what we see from today’s perspective. And then towards the question of the revenue exit. So there is some divestment included in there in regards to the Japan-focused trading business, which we think will, can close in the second quarter of this year. And then think about, like, how to apply some of these growth rates. A very simplistic statement is take the 2025 revenue numbers, subtract the $22 million of exiting business, and apply the growth factors on top of it. That is maybe the very simple statement. You may do a little bit of timing adjustments there, but that is kind of how we thought about it when we put out that slide.

Thank you.

Thank you. Excuse me. The next question is coming from Jairam Nathan of DA Davidson. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for squeezing me in here. So

Matt, Cognex Corporation has, you know, has all this, I think, done a good job in entering markets ahead of everyone else, like logistics. And it looks like, so I am just trying to understand what opportunities could you have with physical AI. There seems to be a lot of focus on sensing, and vision is a key part of that. Things like AMRs, humanoid robots. So I am just wondering if there is, do you see any opportunities in terms of physical AI?

Sure. Yeah. We are probably the oldest physical AI company in the world. We have been, yeah, we have been giving robots eyes, the ability to perceive the world around them, for about 44 years. And that gives us a lot of strength. We know those applications really well, but your question is really more about adjacencies in new markets. Yes, as an organization, we have a very good way of looking at those things, evaluating them, and understanding if we have a strong right to win in them. We like the five verticals, the market verticals we participate in, and we see tremendous growth to continue to expand in those verticals. I think we are not the share leader in every geography, market vertical, or product segment. We aim to be. And so that is our top priority, is winning the core. But as it relates to new markets, you know, we are looking at, you know, what is the future of automation in these massive data centers that are going to be built out over the next several years. You know, there is a resurgence in investment in defense, in particular, and aerospace, particularly in parts of the world like Europe, as those industrial bases come back to life. And these are highly engineered parts that require the highest levels of quality and precision. And so, you know, we are certainly looking at potentially aerospace and defense as a market that could come back to life in a way it has not been in many years. And then certainly robotics, like you mentioned it. And we have been serving the robotics market for decades, I would say. Maybe not in the way that, you know, we are seeing today with humanoids, but much more as it relates to high-speed in-line manufacturing. We have done that in consumer electronics. We have done it in logistics. We have done it in automotive. And you can expect us to continue to invest in how we can be a better provider of vision for the world’s robots. And so, an area where we are thinking about investing in, I would say less so with the angle of humanoids. In full disclosure, we do not see that as such a strong place for us and such a little too far from home in terms of in-line, but many, many other areas for industrial robotics that could use vision, visual perception, and where we see ourselves as really having a great win.

Thanks. And as a follow-up, and then it is just on the trading business with Moritex. Typically, businesses are low gross margin businesses. Should we, could we see a bump from gross margins in the second half with that divestment. Yeah. You are right. That

typically trading businesses are less attractive on the gross margin side, and we saw that in general that Moritex had lower gross margins. So in that regard, that certainly will help a bit on the gross margin side into the second half.

Okay. Great. Thank you.

Thank you. I would like to turn the floor back over to Mr. Moschner for closing comments.

Excellent. Well, thank you for joining us this morning and for your continued support of Cognex Corporation. We look forward to updating you on our progress in the first quarter.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s event. You may disconnect your lines or log off the webcast at this time, and enjoy the rest of your day.