Good morning, and welcome to Canopy Growth's First Quarter Fiscal 2019 Financial Results Conference Call. After markets closed yesterday, August 14, 2018, Canopy Growth issued a news release announcing its financial results for the first quarter ended June 30, 2018. This news release will be available on Canopy Growth's website and filed on SEDAR. On the call this morning, we have Bruce Linton, Canopy Growth's Founder, Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer, and Tim Saunders, Canopy Growth's Chief Financial Officer. In addition, Mr. Rob Sands, the CEO of Constellation Brands is joining the call today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Certain matters discussed in today's conference call or answers that may be given to questions could constitute forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated. Risk factors that could affect results are detailed in the company's annual information form and other public filings that are made available on SEDAR. During this conference call, Canopy Growth will refer to supplemental non-GAAP measure adjusted EBITDA. These measures do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by IFRS. Adjusted EBITDA is defined in the press release issued earlier today as well as in this period's Management's Discussion and Analysis document that are filed on SEDAR. Please note that all financial information is provided in Canadian dollars unless otherwise specified. Following the prepared remarks by Mr. Linton, Mr. Sands, and Mr. Saunders, the company will conduct a question-and-answer session during which questions will be taken from analysts. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Bruce Linton. Mr. Linton, please go ahead.

Good. Thank you. So for everyone on the call, the flow will be, I'm going to say some remarks, Rob will, and then we'll move to the quarter and will cover that off and then we'll go to questions asked, and then we'll cover both. What I would say is a pretty significant and interesting transaction where Constellation is acquiring about another 25% of Canopy for approximately $5 billion. So I'd like to say good morning and welcome to Rob and it's been great. People on this call were recalling October 2017 Constellation and Canopy announced that we're having this investment coming and the relationship was going to begin, and we're going to focus on beverages and brands. And with that announcement, everyone got excited and so did we and then we went off to work and there hasn't been a week go by that people from my company aren't interacting and building and thinking with people from Rob's company. And we've established I think an unbelievably confident, comfortable level of appreciation for how they run as entrepreneurs and how we do. So this a relationship that it has been built and so when the capital comes in, we each know what we're getting and we're looking forward to going faster. So this is really rocket fuel. It does add quite a lot. As we look around the world, we're going to be expanding production, we're going to be doing more research, we're going to develop more intellectual property, we're going to create more leading brands, we're going to have more products, and we're going to be way more global. If you're thinking about this it does establish that Canopy is the cannabis platform for Constellation. And that's a great deal of focus and trust, and we took it seriously…

Well, thanks a lot, Bruce, and good morning, everyone. This is extremely exciting time to be part of what could potentially be one of the most significant global growth opportunities for the next decade. We worked closely with Canopy throughout the last year to better understand the cannabis market, this unbelievable opportunity it presents and Canopy's market leading capabilities in the space. Constellation’s incremental CAD5 billion, US$4 billion investment in Canopy growth is the largest investment to date in the cannabis space. The most strategic aspect is that Constellation will be exclusively working with Canopy for the global cannabis opportunity that we believe is opening up much more rapidly than appreciated as Bruce said. We believe that having a single platform to address all markets and formats globally is essential to winning in the space. This investment and alignment represents the next step in the evolution of our business as we solidify our strategic partnership with Canopy. I'd like to take a few minutes to walk you through the strategic rationale and highlights of the Constellation investment, and why we believe the Canopy is the best partner to align with in this cannabis space. Canopy plans to use the proceeds to bolster their global leadership position in the cannabis industry by building or acquiring key assets needed to establish global scale. Strategic priorities beyond Canada include the U.S. and the nearly 30 countries currently pursuing a federally permissible medical cannabis program, intellectual property development across medical and recreational opportunities, while also preparing and creating brands and products for the new legal recreational cannabis markets. This transaction supersedes our initial agreement with Canopy to produce a non-alcoholic cannabis-based beverage. Now going forward, Constellation will support Canopy's full suite of products that are currently available and assist as they develop new offerings across various product formats and through all new and existing channels. This partnership is a powerful combination of Constellation's expert capabilities in M&A, marketing, brand building and large scale production and Canopy’s entrepreneurial approach and best-in-class knowledge and expertise within the emerging cannabis market. So as the leader in the total beverage alcohol space, we look forward to reaping the benefits of our cannabis investment, which we see as being incremental to our core beer, wine and spirits portfolio. Bruce and the Canopy team has built a phenomenal business, and I'm very excited about the excellent prospects for this business as the global cannabis space emerges. So with that said, I'd like to now turn the call back over to Bruce so that Bruce can proceed with the view of Canopy's quarterly results. Thank you, everybody. Bruce?

Great. Thanks, Rob. And why - I suspect we'll get a chance to answer a few questions on that. So let's move to the quarter. It was a good quarter. We continue to lead the medical cannabis market in Canada and around the world. We add about $25 million in revenue, that's about 63% up year-on-year. Price per gram moved up and that reflects increased sales to Germany and change of format. So Germany was about $3 million in revenue this quarter, we don't count the German patients in our patient count at 85,000 patients, that’s in Canada only. We’re busy, we got the Spectrum soft gels and this will be important. The mode of educating doctors is going to be very much about how you move them along so that they are educated in the application of which strengths and types of cannabis are suitable. The soft gels became color-coated so that if we do our sleep trial, which we announced the Phase IIb sleep trial, if we find that the combination of delivery mechanisms and, say, Spectrum blue gets a positive response on sleep, as we migrate people through that, they're going to find that their sleep tool is Spectrum blue. That doesn't talk about cannabis, it talks about a product. And if you can start to make claims about a product, the format of the product can shift from a gel cap to an inhalation device to whatever, and people, we think, will become very comfortable with the name, the brand, and the Spectrum positioning and it doesn't then link back to any specific strain. So those are kind of migratory path items, but they're important and they have been laid down. We've been busy in Canada and Europe. We've got Spectrum Cannabis operations now in 11…

Thank you, Bruce, and also thank you, Rob. And good morning, everybody. I'll proceed now with a review of the first quarter ended June 30. Revenue for the first quarter was $25.9 million, representing a sequential quarter-over-quarter increase of 14%, and 63% increase over the quarter, same quarter last year. Included revenue, as Bruce mentioned, revenues in Germany totaled $3.4 million to our German subsidiary, Spectrum Cannabis GmbH. Oils including soft gel capsules accounted for $5.2 million, and $1.1 million, respectively for this quarter and the same quarter last year or 26% and 19% of productivity revenue respectively. The total quantity of cannabis sold during the quarter was 2,695 kilograms, and kilogram equivalents at an average price of $8.94 per gram, up from 1,830 kilograms and kilogram equivalents at an average price of $7.96 in the same quarter last year. Our average price, as Bruce mentioned, was principally due to increasing sales in Germany as well as the product mix with oils and gel caps accounting for increasing proportions. The average sale price per gram sold in Germany was $13.62 per gram. As Bruce just mentioned, today we just stand over 2 months away from the opening of the rec market, an event that we've all been preparing for and investing in for the last 2 years. We've invested and continue to invest significant effort, capital and resources in activities and programs to ready the company to participate in and lead the Canadian recreational cannabis market. These investors continue to cover the company's entire business operations including production, fulfillment, marketing, sales and G&A. In the first quarter ended, June 30, the company harvested 9,685 kilograms with over 2.4 million square feet of area in BC Tweed, greenhouses, licensed and planted early in the first quarter of fiscal 2019, and with…

Great. Good job on the quarter, Tim and his team, all of that coupled with New York Stock Exchange has made for an active quarter for finance team, and I appreciate the work. So with that, I'll open it up to questions, please.

[Operator Instructions]

And I should clarify that I and Tim will be taking questions. Rob has already provided his input, and so I thank him for that.

And your first question today comes from the line of Tamy Chen with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Thanks. Hi Bruce and Tim. I had a couple of questions on the Constellation announcement. Firstly is, and you're getting a big inflow of capital about the $5 billion, which is quite substantial. So could you discuss a bit more about how you're thinking about where and how you intend to deploy that?

Sure. So we're not putting hard guidelines on it, but when we look at our current target acquisition list, it exceeds $1 billion for international and I'll call it non-cultivation assets. We know that, that list will grow. We're getting ready for other markets to open up so we want to have a little cash on the balance sheet for things like America, if it comes around. We also know that based on what's happening in Germany and a number of the other places, the RFPs are coming back out and the build programs are substantial. And I mentioned earlier, if you look at our assets in Canada, it's about $1.4 billion of real assets to serve this country. We see what we have to put together from Germany to Chile, Australia to some of the activities we're supporting in other European areas. We used quite a lot of that up. And then we'll have a much bigger asset base to have a much larger yield on. So I think, you'll like what you see as far as our targets that we hit, as far as acquisitions over the next 6 and 12 months, assuming we we close on some of those, I think -- I'll say that makes quite a lot of sense.

Okay, got it. The second question is, has Constellation secured any rights to participate in future equity financings of yours so that they can stay above the 50% on a fully diluted basis state?

Right. So assuming the exercise, the current warrants, which will get them to about 16.4%. This transition takes them up over 38%, and the way it's structured is that there is an additional 2 pieces of an instrument. There is a second warrant that would move them to approximately 50% and that's priced in the press release and then there is a final, I'll call it, at the VWAP future unstated price, additional 5%. Through the process, we've built a mechanism so that as we make further acquisitions, there's an opportunity for quarterly top up so that they can retain their, then current, percentage, and I would call it almost sort of a normal course right to maintain and not be diluted and [indiscernible] in there.

Okay. Got it. And lastly, if cannabis is completely legalized at all levels of the U.S. government, could you talk a little bit about how you would approach that market, both the medical and the recreational sides?

Sure. So there's a bunch of scenarios under which that might happen. It could be, as you described, it could be state by state. What's going to happen, I think, however, is that if you have intellectual property in clinical trials and results that show medical efficacy, you're going to be able to take those through, specially the intellectual property protection does as we do, which is, it starts with the U.S. first filing, though you have a suite of products that need production assets and the whole supply chain. What we've learned in Canada is how to do scale. And so I think what you'd find is, if California become a federally permissible place, you kind of need essentially one Canopy asset group from everything we've got, dropped into there to produce all the products that we'd want to take to market. There will be some markets where there are brands that we would perhaps buy, but they really aren't scale production assets so we will create those, and I think, we have an accelerating advantage in the event that occurred. And that would then take us into everything that's a strength of ours and Constellation, which is if you have legal, medical and legal rec, part of the chain as a product, well part of it is delivery system, the support infrastructure, the sales reps, all of the things that make you successful in a CPG and then the second part is, we think that our medical approach, and we've expanded our team to include internationally capable and recognized pharma leaders who are joining us that team, I believe, is going to do a very good job in creating everything from NHP products, natural health products right through the finished Rx trials and those are going to be designed and delivered so that they aren't just for Canada or just for Germany, and I think it will give us a material advantage into that segment so we feel good about the cash coming in because there's a lot more work right now than we had capital and capacity, this accelerates it. We also get to draw down on resources at Constellation. So part of the structure of this deal is that anything that they have that we need we have a service's arrangement where we will try to orderly access and use so that we can accelerate with them as part of our team. And so that is, I think, going to be quite a good bit of leverage.

Your next question comes from the line of Martin Landry with GMP Securities.

Good morning. Congratulations on that investment. Just wondering to follow-up a little bit on the capital deployment. It was helpful to give us a little bit your acquisition pipeline, but wondering how long do you think it could take you to deploy that $5 billion of cash inflow. And maybe if we look at the next 12 months, and under your ideal scenario, how much capital would you have deployed?

We’re not benchmarking against it but I’ll put a few more buckets [indiscernible]. Ontario, how many stores might we get, how many have you built out? As we stack our medical trials and we start rolling those out and I think that once you have stabilized ingredients, the ability to deliver and design many more trials accelerates. So we've got both animal first one out and human first one out. I don't think it'll be a big gap to have multiple other that could line up behind it. So we we're not pacing it out. But I suspect as eyes watch us each quarter, you will see strategic investments that are often acquisitions or buildout, we'll we use cash now, not dilutive shares. In our quarterly calls, we will check against what did we get done and I think you will find that list moves very quickly. We have been on the M&A and buildout review looking at assets around the globe for about a year and with Constellation's team to assist us in executing some of these M&A transactions because Rob and his team have been clear, this is where they are placing their bet, they are not now looking at any other M&A even in their sector for some time so that team comes to us. So I don't want to give you it'll be this much by Tuesday, but I suspect we will move quite quickly and we have done to date, Tim might be able to remember the exact number, but I think we're on acquisition number 9 inside of Canopy already so we're pretty confident at that.

Okay. And is the ultimate goal for Constellation to take control of Canopy in time?

I can't speak to their ultimate goal, but I suspect if we do what we're going to do which is build a global platform that generates massive amounts of EBITDA over the next few years, that is a pretty amazing company that everybody would think is a good one to own.

And then just to switch back on the Canadian market and what's coming up with the recreational...

And sorry, I think I should be clear, the way we've structured this, right, they are buying about 25% for about $5 billion right now and I as a shareholder like the race ahead because to your earlier question, what this is about now is about how much can we build, how can great can it be and what does that to the value of the company because the alignment we have with Constellation is on winning and that should work pretty well for the small shareholders including me, in terms of what this looks like for the next tranches.

Okay. And then just to switch to the Canadian market, the domestic and recreational market. I think you've won supply agreements for up to 67 tons over the next year and that excludes Ontario if I understand correctly. And right now, I think you have around 20 tons of dried cannabis in place. Do you have enough inventory to fulfill the first shipments from the provinces? Or you're going to need to bridge some of that?

So Tim can talk about there's more converting inventory and what we have as a product mix. Really, the question is going to come down to, I think we have enough subject to what do they order, right. So part of the reason we have kept a single shipping center is how to manage inventory and how to ship it out, but the pipeline is empty. What proportion of the product are they going to want in bulk, in dried cannabis, containerized, rolled cannabis, gel caps or oils, and so really it's going to be a continuous shifting of orders, inventory and matching it and we're already starting to see some of the provinces putting up their first indication of what they want. I will tell you it's probably going to drain everything, but I think we'll be able to balance it and then the real question is when do they reorder and how much do they reorder? But we're juggling that now. We only have two provinces that have sort of started to give us a positive indication of when they want order and what quantities and we're working through that.

Okay. Thank you.

Your next question comes from the line of Graeme Kreindler with Eight Capital. Please go ahead.

Bruce, you gave a bit of an overview of sort of what the long-term vision is for that company. And obviously, focusing on the large opportunity in medical. Can you just give us some more color around reconciling the medical opportunity in the international markets that Canopy has in front of it versus Constellation being involved in beer, wines spirits and having a number of established brands there. What's bridging the GAAP between that medical opportunity and more of the consumer focus in Constellation?

Sure. So the people and the way the platform gets built is that it focuses on a patient. No country that I'm -- of a material nature is going to necessarily open up and say we don't have any medical program, but we're going to have a cannabis party. So I think what you have to look at is the medical becomes the operational platform that creates the assets that can create the ingredients to create medical outcomes, but then they can quickly increment to CPG. And CPG turns those ingredients into bands, formats and outcomes that people want so that they have better occasions. And I like Constellation as they’ve spent a quite a lot of time with us and observed how Canada has evolved and probably you would place that whole bunch of countries around the world if you are in to dominate in the medical you have all the production assets necessary to take it up to CPG. And so that I think is kind of where you can see the bridge and if you come to two of our facility when you go to our Section 56 exemption lab you have people taking ingredients from cannabis and creating diversity of things that could be from what could be used for an animal product to a human medical to a beverage that looks amazing and sits on a shelf and stays in suspension for quite some time, maybe forever. And so those – that’s where you go from having a managed ingredient market where people want to call it, is this going to become a commodity, no, it is going to become a regulated ingredient and its how they vertically change over the different markets. So I think this is going to alignment with Constellation as we ramp and build Canada, because if you dominate and create great brands in Canada for the adult access those brands and learning programs are going to I think carry lot of wages in geographies.

Okay. Thanks, and just one other question, for those who are un-initiated on the specifics where Constellation Brands are, what’s their plan on actually funding the $5 billion investment?

I believe there is a note in the press release that points to the source of capital, I don’t have in front of me and I read 26 versions of it, so I can’t remember if that ultimately said, is it referenced in there?

It was Bank of America Merrill Lynch is providing the financing for the transactions. So its third last paragraph of the press release.

Okay. Thank you very much.

Please do re-queue that, those are some interesting names to be associated with us and the cannabis space, I think that’s quite remarkable

Your next question comes from the line of Dara Mohsenian with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead.

So first, the total addressable market opportunity you mentioned in the slide deck of $200 billion by 2032 or I guess greater than $200 billion. That was very helpful, but I was hoping for a little more detail as you think about the size of the addressable market over the next 5 or 10 years. Said another way, how quickly do you think that addressable market ramps up towards that $200-plus billion goal in 2032 as you look out over the next 5 to 10 years here.

Sure. So what is that market made up of? Right now, that number is a proxy for switching people from an illegal purchase program to a legal purchase program. And I'm not sure that number is a very accurate proxy for the disruptive nature of what could be created in terms of true finished products that are unique in different -- in medical and rec. So I think the number could in fact be quite a lot bigger than that. The rate of ramp, let's just use Germany. This quarter, if we look back 4, 5 quarters ago, there was zero happening in Germany, this quarter, we did, what, Tim, about $3 million.

$3.4 million.

$3.4 million. And this is where the government largely is the party paying for the cannabis [indiscernible]. That rate of growth as we get more formats and more responses and indications sort of claims, I think increasingly ramps up. And so I would be surprised if the rate at which this is changing 3, almost 4 years ago there about 4 or 3 countries trying to figure out how to regulate this at a federal level, there's about 29 now. So if those continue on a path of growth that if you look at Canada, we have gone from 30,000 patients in an old scheme, maybe 35,000 to maybe 350,000 or 400,000 medical patients in a period of about 4 years and we are about to add, you pick a number. We've got 35 million Canadians, are we going to have 5 million who are interested in rec, 2 million, 8 million, I'm not sure what the number is. I think people are going to have build models, and the models should be driven on which countries are going to move to a medical, who will pay, and when will Canopy have medical claim products that we can file under Pharma insurance. And then, with those countries, which ones are likely to have an electoral event that allows them to move to managing a recreational market? And I believe it's a lot closer in a lot of countries that people think because this is going to pointed to at Canada. It's going to be today evolving success here. And so I take the market rate of growth and probably bring that number way back very soon but that's up to you to create a model. We just have an outside data of what is it, 2032, pretty far out.

Right, that's very helpful. And then as you think about your positioning in the industry. Obviously there's a lot of capital coming into the space a lot of competition. Help give us some background on why this partnership is potentially the leading player in the space as we look out over the next 20 years or so. And how your sort of positioned versus that competitive set and maybe what some of the unique capabilities are on your end?

We're at this now. We will be on a call in a year, 18 months and when you say the competitive set, it won't be any of the cannabis names that are started up in Canada. It will be big Pharma. It will be other packaged beverage, it could be -- a day doesn't go by that somebody doesn't send me an article that the Wrigley family are looking at this, everybody is looking at this. So I think when you talk about competitors and why we are doing this now, we have a great position and a great start. This is about accelerating and getting way further out there before those other big names are in. Getting our products, staking our claims having the leverage that we have now and moving up, so I bet the competitive set in ATUs are big known names and they have to get in the space because this is the most disruptive rapid growth opportunity for EBITDA that any of them are looking at. So it's going to get big, and they're going to get good, and we're going to be way ahead.

Your next question comes from the line of Matt Bottomley with Canaccord Genuity.

Congrats on the announcement. Don't want to beat a dead horse here, but just a couple more questions on the potential deployment of capital here in the near term. So Bruce, where do see the -- maybe when you line up what Constellation brings versus what you've been able to achieve in the Canadian market. What are some of the holes for lack of a better word, even with respect to those two parties that you might need to go and acquire assets to fill. Is it more on the medical technology side? Is it more on boots on the ground getting licenses in various countries? Just any more color on where you think you need to go and increase your exposure?

Yes, so depending on the country, and what you have for the Writle [ph] stack, it could be things as simple as we're not interested in sharing our margin with a Pharma play. We will probably find a little down-on-their-luck biotech company that could do a lot of that lifting for us. So that could be a nice fit. In certain geographies, it's starting with base real estate and moving up through stack, we'll move up through a lot more quickly with what we have to put in. We have an expansion of technology so suppose we get through Reck [ph] October 17 happens and suppose that the government decide the impact are going to do what they said to do and have to do it which increase our product set so that we can actually compete more effectively with the market, I better need a bottling line if I want to have beverages in a great bottle. And so it could see what you spend on that. Those things take off and multiple geographies need the same set of products, which needs the same set of production growth assets, extraction assets, labs lines this is where it goes and so Canada, we're looking at bottling lines and in other countries we're looking at greenhouses. And I think when you're currently in 11 countries and you can see the map going quickly up to more than those you start to understand where the pieces would fit together but it is a bit of rinse once you got it right at scale you can accelerate in every other country.

That’s helpful and maybe just more on the US market as well, obviously you guys have been clear that there's no plan to enter there until its federally legal, but that’s a very, very fast moving market as well, that’s evolving day by day, so how much is Canopy, I guess, investing in terms of its time and following these markets and aligning itself for if the opportunity arises there could be a potential huge opportunity there as well?

Yeah, we have team and now with Constellation have a bigger team that has a very specific mandate to be ready which can mean everything from having options on things to preparing with the right tact and so the US is the best market for sure but no one in there right now can go to scale, all of the conditions created by being federally legal, meaning you have probably a inverted model where there too many producers too few proper processes and very factored product sets across multiple geographies if and when it becomes permissible scale will mean quite a few things changed from the cost of production to the quality of the product and create universal brands actually are the same when people go anyway in any state and I think that is exactly where we play very well with Constellation if an when we can.

Okay. And then just moving north of the border to Canada then, when it comes to, its including the press release that you guys are previously fully funded for everything you wanted to do in Canada, but what’s your view on the climate right now from an M&A standpoint, is there anything that interest you on M&A or do you think just the cash that you now have from Constellation can really fill in any hole that you might to true up in Canada?

We don’t need any production assets, for sure and part of the reason is we’ve figured out there is actually more efficient to take everything we’ve learned after 200 and some odd number of inspections [indiscernible] apply that to the design creation of our assets as you saw when we leased then bought the assets British Colombia with Greenhuts [ph] that program December 1 and February 17 we had our first plant and licenses going and so there is nothing on a production basis, Obviously real estate locations, vertical integration that makes sense but I think in Canada its going to be more of accelerate on build than it is acquire any incremental cannabis asset.

And one last quick question, if you don't mind, on moving away from this deal specifically. Just curious on your key takeaways from the Ontario's press conference the other night with respect to retail. I'm still trying to juggle in my mind how much of this is going to be open to the LPs versus maybe more traditional retail like grocery stores or pharmacies or even some of these illegal dispensaries that they stop doing -- if they stop immediately dispensing. Is it all up in the air right now or do you have a more concrete view as to how much the Canopy's of the world are going to get involved in retail in Ontario?

I think everyone is going to be wanting to be in, but that doesn't mean everyone gets in. So the reason we ended up being selective in 3 provinces already is, if you're going to retail or cannabis, do you have an educational training platform? Yes, we do. In fact, ours has been used by other provinces to train their retail staff. Do you have the appropriate controls in educating practices, security-cleared people to manage and handle all the processes around transit of cannabis, et cetera. So I think we're the most well qualified to win, we won't win all of them, but I would suspect that the model they're going to adopt is probably more similar to Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Newfoundland than it will be BC, and I like the announcement because what was going to be a problem in Ontario was that there were going to be very few stores and they're going to be a very slow process to have more stores, and the province is very good at inventory management and warehousing and they can make their money there. And the effect that while there may be no stores October 17 this year, but if they wanted 400 stores by October 17 next year, that wouldn't be a particularly big push for the private sector to deliver that even much earlier. And so when the -- all the stores rollout, is when we have the next wave of product rights meaning vapes, probably ingestibles, it can include a beverage, we would expect, and now there will be way more points of sale. And so I was smiling with the announcement occurred because what we're going to have is a great retail platform, us and others, to sell great products, which is what we're creating and I think that that is going to be way more important than having 40 stores for the province. So it's a little bit of a short-term hit to launch things the way I'd like to see them, and most provinces check if you are a criminal. Every province we have been awarded stores, we've had to give as much as 3 years back-history on our personal incomes and spouses and total assets. I suspect if you're currently breaking the law, the likelihood of meeting the criteria of getting a license is pretty low.

Your next question comes from the line of Andrea Teixeira with JP Morgan.

So Bruce I have two questions, please. One is to understand from your prepared remarks, that 100% of the use of proceeds will be international, and also as you mentioned, you don't need more production capacity. But you also mentioned California. Would you make a position in the U.S. given its still federally illegal and I think that would be different from what Constellation had said before.

No. So I should be clear. We definitely do not participate in federally illegal markets. I use California as an example of scale, but until it's federally legal, we will not participate in a market. So I should have been more clear, if I wasn't, that has been 100% our platform and has been since day one.

And then, one more housekeeping and I'm sorry to because it wasn't clear in the release. So I'm trying to calculate the fully diluted number of shares now as you're getting to -- as you get the warrants that Constellation had, the 18 million shares they had and then you do the math and correct me if I'm wrong, they're getting to about 324.7 million shares now without the new warrants. And then, is it fair to assume, just to the $5 billion divided by this number of shares, you have about, you just got about C$15 [ph] per share. Is that the way we should think?

No.

They're incrementing their ownership position from just under 15% to -- by 25 percentage points.

Yes, so we're getting to, yes – we get into the number of shares that you announced today and you divide and make an addition in the number of shares and the warrants that converted I just wanted go back with the warrants that they converted before the infusion of that cash, because that’s not additional money I'm assuming, that is the money that they had committed before and then in addition to that they put in $5 billion and then the new warrants will get additional $4.5 billion, is that the way to think about?.

So let me while Tim digs up the share count. When I indicated our principal interest is into now our production assets, that doesn't mean that I might not need specifically real estate assets for retail or other things of that nature. So I want to clarify that. On the warrants, they have not yet been exercised. One half of them has an immediate right or access to them. So the $245 million was divided in 2 tranches, one of which was eligible to be exercised this month and one which is accessible in 20 -- early 2019. So Tim can go into the model, but those haven't yet converted, but obviously at $12.97 per unit, they are in the money and would convert.

If you're looking at the numbers at the end of June, there are other transactions that have happened since then with the acquisition of the remaining shares of BC Tweed and CHI and the like and when you bake in the all of the AESOP stock options on a fully diluted basis before this on a pro forma basis about 268 million [ph] fully-diluted shares outstanding. So you're then committing that by the [indiscernible] divided by the 4.5 million shares from Constellation, which gets to -- that 104 million is the extra 25% that gets them to about 30.1% at this investment, the $5 point [ph] little over $5 billion. And then the warrants, as you said, is incremental money that could be exercised over the next 3 years.

And the purchase price on those shares is -- the new shares, the purchase price isn't released, but it was $48.60 per share.

Per share, that's correct.

Per share, so the way we can get the math, simply take 104 million divided by 38%, and then we get into the fully diluted. It was just like, as you were saying, there were so many transactions and I'm assuming that triggered a lot of different options exercises. As you correctly pointed out, we don't know what's your -- it will be helpful to have a fully diluted number of shares in the next few months so that we can kind of calculate money in, money out.

That's good advice. We will -- because of the number of transactions we do, and this transaction is -- things get popped up, we will be specific in our go forward quarterlies where we are in terms of total share count and what contributed over the quarter.

Your next question comes from the line of Alan Brochstein with New Cannabis Venture.

Hey guys congratulations. Just a couple of quick ones.

Did we lose Alan?

I think we did.

Your next question comes from the line Todd Duvick with Wells Fargo.

Your next question comes from the line of Tim Ramey with Pivotal Research. Please go ahead.

Good morning, thanks. Can you hear me?

I am very happy to hear you.

So I live in the state of Oregon which is a legal state And I think he spoke to this a minute ago but I'd love to have you flush out a little bit more. You know it appears that there is some over saturation of the market right now. And I guess your point of view would be that you know these players are not going to be the players the competitive set that that would exist in five years that big pharma or yourselves or whoever comes in when it is a federally legal market would supplant the existing. Can you just kind of talk about you know the idea that there has been some over saturation in the early development in legal states?

So you know there may be a place where the supply chain incorporates the producers as a you know really when we talk about cannabis in Canada when we report on it we've changed how we report on it. We used to report how many grams and everything was about cost per gram and grams, grams, grams. The problem with that is we actually think about milligrams active ingredients. And so the producer of the active ingredients could be some of the coal or the currently produce what we make our value and what I think our specialization is going to be evolving to is the ability to convert those milligrams into medical and non-medical recreational products that people prefer over anything that's on the market today and it's because if you run things through a true medical program and you can make claims and you can create the consistent outcome people want that. I don't know that calling it medical marijuana without having the appropriate level of diligence in creating truly medical outcomes is doing it a big favor. So I think that will be disruptive and the Constellation package with us on making consistent quality products whether they're beverages or vapes or others is going to be a big deal. So saturation I think is a problem if you don't have proper conversion proper conversion is a problem if you don't have a strong and big platform to do things that just described. But even at a saturated rate what's the average price per gram and are gone now U.S. retail. What would you what would you pay seven bucks eight bucks ten bucks. I have no idea. But when we are saturated price rate in Canada when we do a large platform of production will relapse reporting and you start to see cost per gram going while below dollar for production in a highly secure platform. And so I think the saturation things more about the ingredient than it is the finished good and we're actively moving way up from the ingredient.

Okay, and then just relative to Canada, I think I heard you say you didn't need production assets, which sounds like grow greenhouse type assets, but I also heard you say you do need potentially bottling assets and things like that. So I just wanted to kind of parse that out, there will be incremental delivery methods that don't exist today, can we assume?

Yes, so we have about 6 million square feet of planned or completed production assets, about 70% of that in greenhouses and 30% are indoor, think of large factories. The greenhouse platforms that get used in Canada are -- can be quite substantial so we have set in the West Coast that one grouping of greenhouses is about 1.7 million square feet. The other is about 1.3 million square feet. Our smallest greenhouse array is about 7,000 square feet. So that's kind of the scale of that sort of production. What we're talking about are much smaller square footage assets that are in the business of converting the output of those large platforms of production that I described earlier and those can be quite costly platforms when the GMP Pharma 1 type platforms, they're costly per square foot, but you use far, far fewer square feet.

And your next question comes from the line of Alan Brochstein with New Cannabis Ventures.

Sorry about that, guys. I thought I'd give it another try. I don't even know if you heard the last one.

We did not.

So Bruce, you have been pretty pessimistic about the timing of legalization in the United States. And I know this deal is about more than U.S., but that's obviously a key part of Constellation's interest. Have you changed your own views at all? I know things change quickly?

My views are evolving and I think more that we have interacted with different regulators, I could see state-by-state happening much sooner than later. I'm not sure that you're going to see a national platform, but I could see some state-by-state structures that would make it federally legal if it was legal in the state. And so best to be very prepared so our laydown plan is have all of the working cases together and be ready to go when it's legal and bring scale and bring products.

Got it. And then I've got this question a lot. I'd think you guys have publically addressed it, but shareholders just approved the potential stock split, and I was just wondering what that's all about?

Optionality. So I was thinking at that time that we had the right to do up to 3x split. That is parked, but it was one of the things that I prefer to have the optionality because it was a special shareholders meeting, which was also to enable us to increase the AESOP pool. So I did that and we have in our pocket, those things don't really stale date for at least a year.

Okay. And then the next one is just kind of more about the near-term on the financials, Tim? Obviously, and thanks for breaking out as you guys have been doing for the extra costs to build outside of Canada as well as the always confusing biological asset stuff. Going forward, are the operating losses, excluding those other factors outside of these two I mentioned, do you expect them to be continue to trend higher, Tim?

I think you're going to see certainly domestically as we started to get recreational orders in the provinces the revenues numbers going to go up and cover so that will reduce the losses as expected as we've indicated previously that will be EBITDA positive shortly in the near term. So he said those losses you're seeing today that's as if we're spending for rec market that's not there today. Are you guys against medical revenue so you should see that all come down.

Okay, that’s all I had.

Why don't we take one more question if there is one and then we can all get on to our next activity.

And your final question comes from the line of Robert Altman with Evercore ISI. Please go ahead.

Great, thank you very much. You know you were very clear that you don't want to participate in any federally legal markets. I get that. On the other hand California is arguably the largest market right now. You want first mover advantage. Heineken has found a way that they believe that they're comfortable in terms of participating in that market through Loggie NIDA's [ph]. Can you tell us a little bit why you are uncomfortable finding some sort of legal or corporate mechanism to participate in California and why –and you know how you're thinking about this.

So we are not really keen to divulge exactly where we are going but for sure, we will do every that is fully federally lawful to be available in a market. And we think there are mechanisms of action that we can take that we're working through. There will be nothing federally illegal in what we do. I'm not sure we've looked at all the actions of others and I think some of them have crossed the line, but I think that it may become federally legal sooner than people think and we will be more ready than probably is understood at this time. So I know I'm being general, but part of the reason we do these calls is so that people who are in the sector can understand what we're doing and then they try to follow us, which hasn't been a good practice is the past, and we're going to little bit more coy on this one.

Got it. And obviously you're looking at California very closely. You understand what's going on there. Do you think that the California regulatory framework is the one that's most likely to be adopted in other states? And how would you assess how things have developed in California year-to-date?

Yes, so I'm not an expert on California but we do find it quite interesting when he observe things like when you really do apply a controlled system what happens to the total number of distribution points, what happens to the quality of the product and the failure rate of testing of product that was permissible before. So I think you start to see a much more effective control system. We hope that the level of controls is high and gets higher everywhere, because the client is not going to be satisfied if the quality of the product is inconsistent, if it has pesticides or sprays, if it's failing. And you're seeing in California, we have seen that there has become a shortage in a sense of credit because of active testing that's insisting on the quality or standard that is permissible. I hope that standard is what they do across the U.S. and it wouldn't hurt. If it was little higher because of the chain of custody on product is key to actually squeezing out the illicit market and there is bit more that could be done I think in more states regulations on that.

Well congratulations, you've got a terrific partner in Constellation. Very eager to see how these things well.

Thank you, and you're right, I suspect after this call we can get back to work with Constellation and that's kind of why the cash came in because we worked very well together. So thanks to everyone for the call and look forward to during this call.

This concludes Canopy Growth's First Quarter of Fiscal Quarter 2019 financial results Conference Call. A replay of this call will be available until [November 13, 2018] and can be accessed by following the instructions provided in the company's press release issued earlier today. Thank you for attending today's call. And enjoy the rest of your day. Goodbye.