Tim Saunders
Analyst · GMP Securities
Thank you, Bruce, and good morning everybody. So, our revenues for the first quarter fiscal 2018 were $15.9 million, which represents 127% increase over the same quarter last year when revenues totaled $7 million and it's an 8% increase over the revenues in the previous fourth quarter fiscal 2017 when revenues were $14.7 million. As Bruce talked about just a few minutes ago, at the year-end call, we had commented that Q1 was all about setting the stage for the rest of the year and going forward by investing resources to reset the Mettrum operations and consolidate our customer base on to a common online storefront and expanding our oil production capability. Launching the Tweed Main Street online store in the first half of April required moving individual Tweed, Mettrum and Bedrocan e-commerce sites offline and migrating over 55,000 customers to a single database and new e-commerce platform, which naturally reduces the sales activity over a period of approximately ten business days in April and some of the days after that followed for our customers to acclimate themselves with the new format and logon. Since then and as of today, we've broken through the 60,000 patient level, so continue to grow. In addition, the sales reported in the first quarter were partly due to the lower availability of Mettrum products during the first quarter as a result of Mettrum growing operations being mostly inactive through the last part of the fourth quarter of last year and also through much of the first quarter of this fiscal year, while being integrated with new standard operating procedures and quality control procedures as well as a new production layout configuration. The total grams sold during the first quarter was 1,830 kilos and kilogram equivalents, at an average price of $7.96 per gram, up from 984 kilos and kilogram equivalents or up 86% at an average price of $7.09 in the same quarter last year. Now, next I’d like to speak to the cost of gram cultivated and sold. This quarter, we are introducing a revised presentation of the weighted average cost per gram in our MD&A and it's also in this press release, which we hope will provide more clarity as to the components driving the cost per gram and the impact at each major stage. Specifically, the new presentation breaks out the cost per gram grant to harvest, which is from clone to harvest, and this includes all the cash costs, including growing labor, utilities such as hydro and water nutrients, rent and allocated overheads. Second, the presentation also includes postharvest cost per gram, which includes all the cash operating costs associated with, among other things, trimming, milling, drying, conversion to oils and gel caps, lab services and testing and also allocate overheads. And finally, the presentation also shows the cost per gram for shipping and fulfillment, which includes all those cash operating costs associated with labor for pre-packaging and dispensing and order fulfillment and shipping along with packaged material, such as bottles, boxes and labels, as well as all shipping costs allocated overheads. Further, royalties paid under licensing arrangements are also included in the cost per gram for shipping and fulfillment. So, saying all that, in the first quarter, the weighted average cost per gram of cultivation to harvest and post-service costs, excluding shipping fulfillment, was $1.28 per gram. This compares to a $1.64 per gram in the same period last year and to $1.46 per gram in the most recent fourth-quarter. The total weighted average cost per gram to produce, harvest and sell cannabis including shipping fulfillment costs in the first quarter was $2.78 as compared to $2.65 in the same quarter last year and $2.90 in the most recent fourth quarter. The weighted average cost per gram decreased from the fourth quarter, primarily due to improving efficiencies in the drilling and post-harvest activities. But the first partial offset was due to the higher fulfillment costs principally due to premium packaging employed to market, our diverse brands and to the impact royalties paid on certain strains driven by the sales mix of associated strains. Next, I’ll discuss the gross margin. The presentation of the cost of sales is new and has been redrawn to better understand the nature of the margin and impact of the IFRS fair value accounting for biological assets. The gross margin is subtotaled to present the cash gross margin before the impact of the fair value changes of the biological assets that's in the inventory sold as well as for the unrealized changes in the fair value of biological assets themselves. The total gross margin includes all of the above. As a result of the new presentation, we no longer present the non-GAAP measure that we previously referred to as adjusted product contribution. Gross margin before the non-cash gains and losses over the three months ended June 30 was $9 million or 57% of sales. However, this number includes costs amounting to $1.4 million related to resetting the Mettrum grow operations and centralizing the various shipping fulfillment activities to Smiths Falls. As well, it includes the operating cost of those subsidiaries not yet cultivating or selling cannabis. If you were to exclude those costs, the gross margin would have been $10.4 million or 66% of revenue. In the same quarter last year, the gross margin before non-cash gains or losses was $2.8 million or 60% of revenue. Including the accounting for the non-cash changes in the fair value of biological assets, the gross margins were $19.7 million or 124% of revenue. And in the same quarter last year, the gross margins $3.4 million or 49%. Now, turning for a moment to operating expenses, sales and marketing expenses in the first quarter were $6.4 million or 40% of revenue and this compares to sales and marketing expenses last year of $2.3 million or 32% revenue. The company has been committed to building strong brand recognition, investing in customer acquisition program, which we consider to be a strategic investment. Management believes the investment will strengthen both customer acquisition and retention. In addition, the company is aggressively seeking new domestic and international business opportunities to lay the future foundation and has been very active on this front. G&A expenses in the first quarter were $7.5 million or 47% of revenue and $2.9 million last year or 41% revenue respectively. These higher admin costs reflect the expansion of Canopy's activities since a year ago and including both domestically and internationally. So, these naturally attract higher professional advisory fees, staffing, higher facility costs due to new locations, as well as investments made in information technology support and compliance costs associated with being a TSX-listed company. Overall, the increase in G&A reflects Canopy's growth and building a commercial capacity and capability as well as being a public company. Stock-based comp and depreciation and amortization, both non-cash expenses, were approximately $4 million and $5.1 million respectively in the quarter. In comparison, stock-based comp and depreciation and amortization were each approximately $0.9 million in the same quarter last year. As a result of all of the above, in the first quarter of this year, we recorded a loss from operations of $4.2 million. And after income tax, the company reported a net loss of $4.4 million or $0.03 per basic share and diluted share. The net loss in the first quarter includes acquisition costs of approximately $836,000, non-stock compensation and depreciation totaling $9 million; and is included – inclusive in the non-cash gain, effect of the IFRS accounting for biological assets and the inventory sold, amounting to $10.7 million. In comparison, the net loss was approximately $4 million or $0.04 per basic share in the same quarter last year. As the new financial statement presentation lays out the cash and non-cash amounts in earnings for readers, we'll no longer present the non-GAAP measure adjusted EBITDA. Now, turning our attention to the balance sheet and cash flows, at June 30, the company's cash comprised of cash and cash equivalents totaling $115.5 million, representing an increase of $13.6 million from the end of last year. The increase from the end of fiscal 2017 was mainly due to $35.3 million in cash raised by our subsidiary Canopy Rivers, which is consolidated in our accounts. And it's partially offset by capital expansion totaling $10.2 million, principally at Smiths Falls, Bowmanville and, to a lesser extent, at Drummondville and to fund our operations. As I said, investments are primarily improvements at our Smiths Falls facility. It includes the conversion and construction of growing rooms, new drying rooms, and expanding fulfillment rooms to centralize all related activities, and to the retrofit and expansion of our Bowmanville South facility, as well an expansion of cannabis oil extract production capacity at Smiths Falls. And further, we are also continuing to make improvements in our information technology to scale the business. At June 30, inventory amounted to $65.5 million and biological assets were $9.3 million, together totaling almost $75 million. At June 30, the company had 10,715 kilograms of dry cannabis and 2,683 liters of cannabis oils in various states from concentrated resins to finished oils. Included in the dry cannabis quantities was 1,235 kilos available for sale in the company's online stores, 2,974 kilos are in process of finishing or waiting approval for sale, and 6,506 kilos are held for extraction. And with the commissioning of the AES industrial capacity extraction equipment and recent launch of soft gel caps that's now available for sale, the extraction inventory is expected to be converted to oils and capsules over the next few quarters. I apologize for the long harangue, but this concludes my review of the financials for the first quarter. And I'll turn the call back to Bruce for closing remarks.