Greetings, and welcome to the Q1 2022 Results Conference Call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Afterwards, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded, Wednesday, May 4, 2022. I would now like to turn the conference over to Toby Caron, Treasurer and Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. Welcome to Centerra Gold's first quarter 2022 results conference call. Please note that presentation slides are available on Centerra's Web site to accompany each speaker's remarks. Today's call is open to all members of the investment community and media in listen-only mode. Following the formal remarks, the operator will give the instructions for asking a question and then we will open the phone line to questions. Please note that all figures are in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted. Joining me on the call today are Scott Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer; and Darren Millman, Chief Financial Officer. I would like to caution everyone that certain statements made today may be forward-looking statements and as such are subject to known and unknown risks, which may cause our actual results to differ from those expressed or implied. Also, certain other measures we will discuss today are non-GAAP measures. Please refer to the description of non-GAAP measures in our news release and MD&A issued this morning. For a more detailed discussion of material assumptions, risks and uncertainties, please refer to our news release and MD&A along with the unaudited financial statements and notes and all of our other filings, which can be found on SEDAR, EDGAR and on the company's Web site at centerragold.com. And now, I'll turn the call over to Scott.

Thank you, Toby, and a very good day to everyone. Thank you for joining us for our Q1 earnings conference call. Just referencing Slide 4 of the accompanying presentation deck and just referencing the bullet points on the top left, I think we had another good quarter in terms of metal production. You can see during the Q1 period, we produced just under 94,000 ounces of gold and some copper production of some 20.6 million pounds. This is a good level of metal output. And you see that in the third bullet point just in terms of our corresponding all-in sustaining costs. For the quarter, we were producing our gold at a very competitive, very low $395 per ounce. And again in parenthesis, you can see the individual contributions at the individual mine site; Mount Milligan producing its gold as low as $15 per ounce and Öksüt producing its gold as low as $451 per ounce in terms of the all-in sustaining cost metric. Mount Milligan is really benefitting from the strong copper price environment where we take those copper revenues as a byproduct, and that's what's resulting in those very low all-in sustaining cost per ounce. Just in terms of some key developments during the quarter. First of all, just referencing the fourth bullet point. Back in February, we announced the acquisition of the Goldfield District Project in Nevada. We think this is a very exciting addition to our portfolio and our project pipeline moving forward. We think this is going to be a key source of organic growth for Centerra moving forward, and most likely will be our proverbial third leg to our stool. This year, the plan is really focusing on drilling and exploration as we make our way into 2023. We want to be in a…

Thank you, Scott, and good morning all. For those following on the slide deck, we're on Slide 9. Centerra recorded 295 million in revenue during the quarter, consisting of the Mount Milligan mine, the Öksüt mine and our Molybdenum business unit. Revenue consisted of 156 million in gold sales, 68 million in copper sales and 58 million from the Molybdenum business unit. In the quarter, our continued operation sold 94,908 ounces of gold, 40,204 ounces from Mount Milligan and 54,704 gold ounces attributable to the Öksüt mine. We also sold 19.4 million pounds of copper in the quarter. During the quarter, the company's operations average gold price realized was $1,687 per ounce at $3.77 per pound of copper. This incorporates the existing streaming arrangements over the Mount Milligan line. Cash provided by operating activities from continuing operations was 28.3 million for the quarter. And as noted in the MD&A, the Mount Milligan mine recognized four copper/gold shipment sales in the quarter whilst only receiving three provisional cash payments. In the second quarter, we will receive the fourth shipment provisional cash payment of 42 million. Free cash flow from continuing operations for the quarter was 9.1 million, once again impacted by the timing of the Mount Milligan fourth shipment cash receipt, together with the negative free cash flow of 20.1 million from the Molybdenum business unit. We forecast positive free cash flow at the Molybdenum business unit for the remainder of the year, with the release of working capital and reduced costs. At an operational level, the Mount Milligan mine generated 6.4 million in free cash flow for the quarter. The Öksüt mine in the quarter generated 61.4 million in free cash flow. The Öksüt mine continuing operating activities of mining, stockpiling, crushing, stacking and leaching activities in accordance with our…

Thank you, Darren. So just on the last slide here, on Slide 12. So again, as I spoke to earlier, just looking at the bullet points on the top left, I think it was a good quarter in terms of metal output. I think in the third bullet point, you can see the business is performing really well from a fiscal perspective. Again, very low competitive all-in sustaining costs of $395 per ounce, and that's obviously what's really underpinning the strong profitability that we reported during the quarter. And then also, as we've highlighted, I think we've got a very strong financial foundation here. In terms of the balance sheet, we finished the quarter with net cash of some US$768 million. And with the addition of our undrawn revolving line of credit facility, we had some liquidity of approximately $1.17 billion. That certainly allows us to advocate that continuing to operate an internally fully funded business model moving forward. The last two bullet points here in this table here on the bottom left, I think they also just speak to new developments that we will be expecting to report on here in Q2. Firstly, in terms of Öksüt and what is the solution here that we're going to be embarking on. As we've mentioned, I think we'll have news on that shortly here in the Q2 period. With the resolution agreement with the Kyrgyz Republic, as we've mentioned in our disclosures today, we expect to be closing that here in the Q2 period. And I think the other thing I'll just draw on as well is the 43-101 study that is underway at Mount Milligan. Again, we expect to be finalizing that and publishing that here in the Q2 reporting period. Lastly, just from a management update perspective, you would…

Thank you. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Trevor Turnbull with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question.

Thank you. And thank you, Scott. Congratulations on the EA amendment up at Mount Milligan. With respect to that EA, you mentioned that long-term water is now secured for the life of the deposit or for the project. And I just wondered, does that statement include any potential changes that might come with the new mine plan?

Yes, Trevor, thanks for that question. And, yes, I think that statement does allow for any additional mine life that's going to be delineated here with the new 43-101. So the answer is yes.

Okay, great. And then a question on Öksüt. As you kind of work out a solution for the mercury there, I wondered how we should think about how you'll account for cost in Q2. I just wondered, are you going to be able to defer like some of the costs until the gold production and sales take place, or will the costs really be tied to kind of lower sales and therefore potentially abnormally high for Q2?

I'm looking at Darren. Darren, do you want to respond to that?

Yes, Trevor. So we envisage just really a buildup of inventory. So gold in carbon inventory on our balance sheet. We don't imagine too much flowing through our profit and loss or income statement. There might be some idle costs associated with the gold room, but we don't feel that will be a material. So that's sort of how you'll see the flow through in hopefully just Q2.

Okay, that's fine. And then maybe kind of a bigger picture question with the respect to Öksüt. I noticed in the forward-looking statements that you talked about the deposits and in support of an updated resource and new life of mine plan. And I just wondered is -- I didn't know if that was kind of boiler plate forward-looking statements or if we should be watching for an updated mine plan and resource sometime in the near term.

Yes, Trevor, it's Scott. No, I don't think we'll be providing or publishing any new resource or life of mine plan in the short term.

Okay. And then my very last question is about the Moly business and again kind of pointing to those forward-looking statements, there was a reference to potentially restarting or divesting of the mining operations. I was wondering if you could just maybe share your thoughts on the potential for a restart of mining, maybe with respect to what kind of timing it would need or what type of investments might be required if you went that route.

Yes, Trevor, it's very preliminary right now. But myself and the team and our technical team, what we are working on is looking at new feasibility studies, or I'm going to use the terminology reactivation studies for both Thompson Creek Mine and the Endako mine. Really just trying to understand what is the potential economic benefits here, what would be the value proposition, what would be the required upfront capital cost, as you mentioned? We just want to make sure we have a really good understanding of that. What's really generating these studies is, if you look at the prevailing Moly prices, and they've been quite consistently now trading at sort of $19 to $20 per pound. In addition, we are seeing more and more sort of external supply demand sort of analysis that suggesting that this level of Moly pricing could continue. So if you accept that sort of prevailing Moly price environment, it could suggest that there is some deep value here, within our Molybdenum business unit. So we want to make sure that we understand that, and so that's why we're doing those studies. And once those studies are complete and kind of more finalized, that's something that we'll then need to kind of discuss with the Board. But again, you mentioned potentially divesting this Molybdenum business unit, likewise, the strong prevailing Moly price, we have seen interest from third parties as well. So, again, it's important that we understand or we have a view on what is the value here, if we do find ourselves engaging in any discussions with third parties. So I think I'm giving you a long answer, Trevor, but that's why we need to have those studies in hand. We really need to understand what is the value proposition here before we can embark on any next steps.

Yes, that makes sense. Do you have a sense of timing for how long until the studies would be available?

It's not something that we've committed to publishing externally. This is more so something that we're focused on internally as an organization. But I would like to think that myself and the broader management team will have sort of a final product that we can be discussing with our Board in the next sort of three to four months, hopefully.

Okay. And just one quick follow up on that. Because you continue to process some product through Thompson Creek, does that potentially give it a bit of an edge in terms of being a little closer or simpler in terms of reactivating compared to say Endako?

Yes, both concentrates that were historically produced from the Endako mine and the Thompson Creek mine were of high product and that enables additional margins to be recognized in the Langeloth Metallurgical facility in Pittsburgh. So there is benefits of either mine. So I think we're doing those studies, as Scott mentioned. The expectations if we were to make that decision to restart either mine that we would still continue with our existing business model of purchasing third party concentrates and elevate or bettering those for selling in the steel industry, chemical industry. So the more throughput we can get through the Langeloth facility, the higher margins we can overall achieve as a business unit. So it's more of an add-on, Trevor, is how I still look at it.

Okay. I really appreciate the color and look forward to hearing what you come up with. Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Michael Siperco with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

Thanks very much, Scott and team, for taking my questions. A couple of follow ups, but maybe first just on the free cash flow number this quarter, I just want to be clear. This is an understated number, correct, on the timing of that cash received at Mount Milligan? In other words, we should be expecting a reversal of that increase in Q2. And assuming it had been received in Q1, the free cash flow number would be something closer to 60 million. Is that correct? Is that in the ballpark?

Yes, that's in the ballpark.

Okay, very good. And then following up on the questions on Öksüt, so am I understanding this right? In terms of production in Q2, basically we shouldn't be expecting any gold pour, just the buildup inventory of gold in carbon for Q2. Is that correct where we stand today?

Michael, it's Scott here. That's a difficult question for me to answer right now. I think Darren said it in his prepared remarks, we do shortly expect within the quarter to be providing a further operational update on Öksüt. But listen, the reason why I find it difficult to answer your question is one option we are looking at is monetizing our loaded gold in carbon at an offsite treatment facility. And we're in discussions right now with the principle depth. We've certainly been reassured that they've got the infrastructure, installations, technology and the capacity to deal with our loaded gold in carbon. And really, what we're doing right now is we're sort of in the final stages of those discussions, negotiations about what that would look like. If that should all come to fruition here, then we would be actually producing gold during the quarter. But we're not there yet. But we're close. So that's why I'm struggling to answer your question, Michael. I'm just going to pause and see if I've articulated myself well, if you know what I mean?

Yes. No, I think that makes sense. I suppose the question then is, is this something that can be initiated within the quarter? Is this something that you can start doing tomorrow if everything works out, shipping the gold in carbon I mean?

So yes, the answer is yes. It can be initiated within the Q2 period. And again, they have the capacity. But again, it's just going to come down to what are the economics associated with that option? And, obviously, how does that compare -- doing a tradeoff study, how does that compare with fully remediating our ADR facility and treating it on site? What's the tradeoff there, time value of money, et cetera? So that's what we're looking at right now. But yes, I think this could be a potential solution within the Q2 period. But you have to wait until we come back and report to the market on where we've landed on that.

Okay, fair enough. And I guess one more on Öksüt. You referenced the potential solution of shipping gold in carbon over the life of mine. Either way, depending on what comes out of this and I realize you're in the middle of these studies, does anything change in your thinking about the deposit longer term in terms of capital allocation, exploration, mine life extension, those sorts of things that you were talking about last year or is it sort of too early to tell?

If I'm understanding the context of your question, I don't think anything changes with regards to our view of the resource, the reserves, the life of mine profile, how we're going to phase, sequence, develop the deposit? I think that everything remains the same.

Okay, got it. If I can just ask one more question. I suppose Trevor covered the Moly business. Maybe I'll ask about Kemess. Any updated thinking about Kemess either in terms of a project for you or potential divestment, anything along those lines?

No. We've got no update, Michael.

Copy. Got it. Thanks very much. Those are my questions.

Thank you.

Our next question comes from the line of Anita Soni with CIBC. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Thanks, Scott, for taking my call [indiscernible].

Anita, I apologize. You're really breaking up at our end. Operator, was that breaking up at your end as well?

Yes, it was.

Okay, sorry. Can you hear me?

You're getting much better now, Anita, I think.

Okay. So I was just asking whether [indiscernible].

Anita, I'm sorry. I'm going to frustrate you. You started breaking up again.

No worries. It's okay. We'll take it offline.

Okay. Sorry, Anita.

No problem.

Our next question comes from the line of Brian MacArthur with Raymond James. Please proceed with your question.

Good morning. Again, most of my questions have been answered. But can I just follow up in the Moly business. There was a statement made, it's going to be positive free cash flow for the rest of the year. It was sort of negative 20 if I calculate this right in the first quarter, and your guidance originally was consuming 15 I think for the year. So when you say it's going to be positive for the rest of the year, that means positive on a quarterly basis, you haven't changed your forecast that you're actually going to be positive cash flow for the whole year out of the business, i.e. you're going to recover that full 20 million. Has something changed or is it still the same?

So we don't anticipate changing our guidance. The only real change we're anticipating now is the release of additional working capital. You might have noted, Brian, in the quarterly analysis, we make reference to working capital. It's in excess of $100 million. So we're really just releasing a lot more of that than planned for the 2022 year. So that's when I talk took about free cash flow generation, a lot of it's just looking to release more working capital. So we do anticipate to be pretty close to breakeven cash flow. So that's sort of what we're referencing there.

Great, that's what I was trying to get at, the actual cash. And I assume that all assumes no money being spent on restarts or anything. That's just the current ongoing business covering the care and maintenance cost plus release of working capital, right?

That's right.

Thank you very much.

Mr. Perry, there are no further questions at this time. I'll turn the call back to you. Please continue with your presentation or closing remarks.

Okay. Thank you, operator, and thank you everyone for joining us for the call. We'll conclude it there, and I wish everyone a very good day. Look forward to catching up soon. Thank you.

That does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your line.