Thank you for standing by, and welcome to Carlyle Group’s first quarter 2023 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star-one-one on your telephone. I would now like to hand the call over to Head of Public Investor Relations, Daniel Harris. Please go ahead.

Thank you Latif. Good morning and welcome to Carlyle’s first quarter 2023 earnings call. With me on the call this morning is our Chief Executive Officer, Harvey Schwartz, and our Chief Financial Officer, Curt Buser. Earlier this morning, we issued a press release and a detailed earnings presentation which is also available on our Investor Relations website. This call is being webcast and a replay will be available on our website. We will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures during today’s call. These measures should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for measures prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We have provided a reconciliation of these measures to GAAP in our earnings release to the extent reasonably available. Any forward-looking statements made today do not guarantee future performance, and undue reliance should not be placed on them. These statements are based on current management expectations and involve inherent risks and uncertainties, including those identified in the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated. Carlyle assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements at any time. I’m going to begin with a quick discussion of our results and then hand the call over to Harvey. For the first quarter, we generated $193 million in fee-related earnings and $272 million in distributable earnings, with DE per common share of $0.63. We raised $6.8 billion of new capital and deployed $3.8 billion in capital across our carry funds. Our accrued carry balance remains at a robust $4 billion. We declared a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per common share. We know it’s a busy morning, and as we already have a long queue, please limit yourself to one question and move back into the queue for any additional follow-ups. With that, let me turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Harvey Schwartz.

Thanks Dan. Good morning and thank you for joining us today. It’s great to be here with all of you. Some of you I’ve worked with in the past, and others, it will be great to meet you soon. There are three things I plan to review today: our first quarter performance, the macro environment and our general outlook, and lastly I’ll end with some initial thoughts on my first 80 days here at Carlyle. First with regards to our performance, let me be clear - we’re not pleased with our first quarter results. Curt will walk you through the details, but our activity levels and investments, realizations and fundraising were more muted than our prior expectations. We continue to navigate one of the most complex financial markets in recent memory which is clouding the near term outlook and impacting market sentiment. It’s our expectation these effects will last throughout the remainder of the year and impact both FRE and distributable earnings. That said, importantly we are confident that Carlyle is well positioned for when market stabilized and activity levels ultimately pick up. We don’t invest and we don’t run the firm quarter to quarter. The firm has a long history of successfully investing through all cycles. We have a leading private equity business with a long term track record, a fast growing global credit business and a higher performing investment solutions business. We have $381 billion of assets under management and $73 billion in capital available to deploy across strategies and geographies, and we have longstanding, very deep relationships with the largest and most sophisticated global investors. There is substantial and very attractive white space for Carlyle to continue to grow our platform which alongside a disciplined approach to running the firm will ultimately expand margins, expand FRE, and…

Thank you Harvey, and good morning everyone. I want to start with an outlook on three particular areas that complement Harvey’s comments and put our financial results in context with the current macro environment. First with respect to fundraising, we continue to expect to raise more capital this year than we did last year, though the composition of that fundraising has skewed further towards global credit and investment solutions and less from corporate private equity. Over the balance of this year, we expect to see CLO issuance resume in addition to incremental fundraising for a number of credit products, as well as raising capital in our secondaries and co-investment strategies and investment solutions. While we believe that we will attract a significant amount of capital for our next vintage of buy-out funds, we no longer expect these funds in the aggregate to be the same size as their predecessors and now expect to see a decline in buy-out fund sizes across most geographies. Second, as you heard Harvey indicate, we expect that the slowdown in capital markets activity will result in a muted level of near term realizations, pressure on capital markets transaction fees, and lower performance-related earnings. That said, we continue to have $4 billion in net accrued carry and believe the firm’s ability to monetize that carry will be strong over the next few years. Third, our 2023 [indiscernible] outlook. Given uncertainty in current market conditions, including the impact from a slower transactional environment and a lower buy-out fundraising outlook, our 2023 FRE is likely to be modestly below last year. While we expect to see top line fee growth this year, we also expect to see continued investments into our teams and businesses. We will be disciplined managing our expenses while at the same time ensuring the…

Thanks Curt. Before we move onto Q&A, I wanted to reiterate that while there are near term challenges, there is tremendous long term opportunity for the firm. The overall positive trends in the industry and the strength of our brand and our people - well, these are the reasons why I’m here. It really is quite a privilege to be part of this team and part of this firm. Let me turn the call over to the Operator so we can take your questions. Again, great to be here with you.

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from the line of Glenn Schorr of Evercore. Your question please, Glenn.

Hi Harvey, good to talk to you again.

Hey Glenn. Glenn, you’re just breaking up a little bit.

Sorry. Good to talk to you again. I’m curious - you know, it’s a little bit of a unique situation, but new CEO, I heard some of your previous comments. I’m curious how you’d describe, maybe in laymen’s terms, what are you here to do. I saw the quote in the beginning of the slide deck of continuing to expand and diversify the platform. I heard your comment about substantial and very active white space for Carlyle, so I was wondering if you could expand on that a little bit. Thanks.

Okay, well Glenn, it’s good to hear your voice, even a little garbled, but nice to chat with you again. I hope you’ve been well. Maybe I should back up for a second, and before I get directly to your question, maybe I should just talk a little bit about why I’m here and how I got here, and that decision-making process. As I said in my remarks, I’ve known about Carlyle for my entire career. It’s an amazing brand. I know the power of an amazing brand. Since I met with the founders, we clicked immediately, and as I got to know the people, I knew the talent in the organization and the investing prowess, and then really when I looked at the valuation gap between our firm and other firms, it just didn’t make any sense to me, and so the decision to be here actually ended up being quite easy and, as I said, really quite a privilege for me to be part of this team and part of this firm. Now I’ve been here, I don’t know, give or take 80 days, the team reminded me, and I sort of jokingly, or I refer to it sort of in my own Carlyle immersion course, I’ve just been spending time with our LPs, spending time with the teams, getting to know everyone, and probably more importantly giving them a chance to get to know me. In terms of the white space, there’s just a lot of opportunity for us. We have businesses like global credit, which have been growing very quickly. We’ll continue to grow those. There’s the private wealth space, real estate, one of the highest performing real estate teams, there’s a lot of interest there, our solutions business. You know, when you go around the firm, there’s a lot of energy to grow these businesses. Now it’s early days for me, but I can tell you the enthusiasm and the energy is real. Did we lose you, Glenn?

No, thanks. I thought we were limited to one question. I appreciate it Harvey, thanks.

No, I just thought maybe I lost you. No, you are limited to one question, Glenn.

Thanks. Good to hear you.

You too.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bill Katz of Credit Suisse. Your question please, Bill.

Okay, thank you. I think it’s a bad connection as well. First of all, Harvey, congratulations--

We can hear you, don’t worry.

Very good. Congratulations and welcome.

Thank you.

Maybe just to build on your last set of responses to Glenn’s question, can you sort of tie together, maybe as you look at some of these bigger picture opportunities, maybe the top one or two things you’ll be most focused on as you look out over the next year or two, and relative to your discussion of disciplined growth, can you tie that into Curt’s comments about FRE guide down on expenses and where that expense growth may focus? Thank you.

Well, the disciplined growth, that’s just always the way I’ve approached businesses that I’ve been part of, it’s the way the team here approaches things, and so that, again, I would say is more philosophically my approach but has also been the philosophy of the firm. You know, I don’t think it’s a--how do I say this? I don’t really have any favorite children, so I like growth for growth’s sake. We have a lot of resources here, and so if there’s demand for our solutions business, we’ll respond to that; if there’s demand for growing the private wealth footprint, there’s a lot of people in the world that want access to Carlyle and Carlyle investing capability. Some things will take longer, some things will be more immediate, but I don’t think it’s a question of prioritizing one or two things. I think it’s a question of as a team, we mobilize against all these things but we do it quite thoughtfully. We’re not going to rush. I’m certainly not in a rush, and it’s really going to be about excellence of execution and however long that takes. I think it’s more about excellence of execution, but the opportunities are clear.

Harvey, why don’t I take the second part of Bill’s question, really, on FRE and the revised guidance. Look - we’ve been focused on growing FRE. It remains a key priority, and those white space opportunities that Harvey alluded to are going to propel us forward. Now, let’s just kind of level-set and remind everybody kind of where we’ve been. We great FRE 40% in 2022 and over the past five years it’s up about fourfold, and I think we are in great position to continue to do that over the next several years, but this year is not one of those growth years. This year is going to be--this growth trend is not even every year, and this year is a bit of a catch-up and get things in the right place. Let me level-set that a little bit for you. It’s a complicated, complex market environment, as Harvey said in his opening remarks. M&A volumes are about half of what they were just last year. IPO activity is sluggish. U.S. leveraged loans are much smaller, smaller than they have been in many, many years, and so all that activity level is depressed and it impacts our earnings, our ability to generate transaction fees, impacts performance revenues, the lower level that you see is going to impact realizations, and even at Fortitude it affects our fees there, are variable rate, and so as Fortitude does well, we make more money, but mark-to-market types of adjustments impact some of those returns and so right now, it’s at a lower level, and so that’s also impacted our thinking with respect to the current year. But again, we’re in great shape for the long term. We see lots of opportunities for long term growth here and think that we’ll be set up, and we’re going to be very disciplined in terms of how we approach the balance of this year and we’re going to work really hard to outperform where we are.

Okay, thank you both.

Thanks Bill.

Thanks Bill.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Alexander Blostein of Goldman Sachs. Your question please, Alexander.

Great. Hey, good morning everybody, and Harvey, good to hear from you as well.

Hey Alex.

Hey. Sticking with maybe some of the bigger picture kind of initiatives, as you look at areas of growth for Carlyle over the next couple of years, the firm has a really healthy balance sheet, to your point, on generating a substantial amount of cash flow. How are you approaching the capital return framework for the firm, and how are you thinking about inorganic opportunities within the context of the white space that you’ve talked about?

Yes, so the white space list that I went through, obviously that’s not inclusive, right - I mean, that’s not in total, right, so you saw announce the Fortitude transaction - there’s a lot of room for that business to grow the capital markets business, and so our approach to all of this, as I said before, is going to be about patience and excellence of execution. You’re right to point out the balance sheet strength - I think Curt and the team have done an extraordinary job of structuring the balance sheet, it was one of the things I diligenced before I came to the firm, and there’s a lot of cash flow generation. I think that all these things--I think in some respects, Alex, all these things kind of come down to math. We have a cost of capital, we have very strong cash flow and we have a very significant opportunity set, and so you’re going to see us be quite disciplined about how we think about utilizing our capital, but we’re going to invest in growth and we’re going to be very thoughtful about how we deploy that capital. We’re always going to be thoughtful about it. I think in this market environment, you should expect us to be exceptionally disciplined.

Great, that’s helpful, thanks.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian Bedell of Deutsche Bank. Your line is open, Brian.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Welcome, Harvey.

Hey Brian, nice to meet you.

Nice to meet you. Just your comment about the valuation gap that you see at Carlyle, and the enormous opportunity to close that valuation gap, I realize there’s a lot of things to invest in and a lot of white space, and that will create longer term pressure on expenses; but as you think longer term about the franchise in closing that valuation gap, how do you think about potentially changing the compensation structure to align more with some of the peers that have a higher FRE margin, and then how do you think about whether that is one way to do that as opposed to just scaling various businesses?

Hey Brian, it’s Curt. Let me start and Harvey can add in. Look - our compensation structure, we use the combination obviously of cash, carry, equity, and you’ve got to be very careful when you move the cheese. We think very carefully about how all this is set up and how we incentivize our people. The alignment that we have in place does a couple of things. First, it aligns with FRE growth and we’ve had very good growth over the past four or five years in FRE. Second, it aligns with carry generation and performance for our LP investors - very important that we drive LP performance, and the carry that we’ve thrown off, $1.5 billion net realized carry in ’21, a billion dollars last year, that provides a lot of capital as well for the balance sheet, so that alignment is important and keeping people kind of focused on the long term trajectory of shareholder value. The equity awards obviously kind of play into that. All of those things matter, but you’re right - we continue to evaluate how it could be better and drive further things. When we have something to announce in terms of a change, we’ll be sure to make sure everybody is aware of that, but nothing new to announce today.

The only thing I would say, because you mentioned the valuation gap, when I look at the valuation gap and when I was doing my diligence, I didn’t look at it and say, oh, we want to be this firm or that firm. I just knew that it screamed opportunity because I know the power of the brand. What we’re going to do is I think what you’d hope we’d do - we’re going to listen quite carefully to our LPs, we’re going to evaluate our strength internally, and we’re going to marry those efforts together to make sure we deliver to our LPs, we drive growth, and we use our capital along the way. In terms of incentives, I think Curt captured it perfectly. We want our people to be incented, we have fantastic talent here. We want to attract the best talent, we want to retain the best talent, and so all these things are the way that we’ll think through the compensation, and listen - we want to make sure people get paid for performance. That’s how I’m thinking about it philosophically. It’s too early to comment on any specific changes, but I like Curt’s language about the cheese - I don’t think that was a prepared remark, by the way, we probably wouldn’t have put that in a script, but I think he captured it well.

Yes, that’s great color. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brian McKenna of JMP Securities. Your question please, Brian.

Thanks. I believe it’s me, Brian McKenna, but good morning all and welcome Harvey.

Hey Brian.

Hey, how are you? It’s great to see the Fortitude deal get announced a couple days ago, but Curt, can you just remind us about the fee arrangement for Fortitude and then how that evolves over time with underlying performance of that business, and then related, how does the pipeline look for these larger deals looking out over the next 12 to 18 months, and does Fortitude have incremental access to capital for some more deals moving forward or will they have to look to raise some additional capital?

Brian, thanks for the question, and thanks for the comments on Fortitude. Look - we’re really proud of what the team has achieved. If you look in our release, there’s about $55 billion of AUM, there’s about another $9 billion that they have directly invested into our funds that’s not captured in that number, and there’s $28 billion on top of all that, and they’re still out there hunting and looking. There’s a big pipeline and it’s a very well capitalized business, and we had said before that with the raise that we had done previously with our partners, that we were well set up to be able to about double the AUM there, and clearly we remain working on that. But keep in mind these are complicated transactions. Fortitude has done a good job of thinking through this, and they’ve been able to do some things that are unique because of their skill set and how they’re set up and their balance sheet, and these things aren’t easy to get done. We’re very proud of what they’ve been able to achieve. We think we can do more there. The fee arrangement - look, we’re an investment advisor and so we fee really when they directly invest into our products and we fee off of how we help them perform, so that’s a variable rate fee and as they perform well, generally over a trailing basis, we benefit. We grow our fees as they grow in size, and we grow our fees as they perform better, which we obviously contribute to. But look, markets are tough right now, and so some of that has also got this--you know, from a lower level, and we see upside potential from here in terms of fees off of that. But also keep in mind that this new $28 billion, it’s not closed yet, so it will kind of contribute later in the year when it’s ultimately closed. Hopefully that gives you some color, Brian.

Yes, that’s great. Appreciate it, Curt.

Thanks Brian.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris Kotowski of Oppenheimer & Company. Your question please, Chris.

Yes, good morning. Curt in particular, I was wondering if you can give us some more color about the private equity fundraising environment. Obviously we’ve been hearing about the denominator effect all year long last year, and one can only imagine that the post Silicon Valley environment, that that didn’t help things any. But I also wonder if you can talk about it just a little bit on a geographic basis - you know, we’ve heard about that denominator effect particularly as it relates to U.S. buy-outs, but you’ve also got a very strong--two big Asian and European funds that are finishing up, I guess, their deployments and they’ve got a strong track record, and I guess is there any particular strategy or insights you can give us as to how you hope to raise the successor funds there?

Hey Chris, good to hear your voice, and thank you for the question. Look, I am very proud of my partners, especially in the buy-out space and the private equity space - long, very successful track record, done a lot of great stuff over the years and fully eager to take advantage of opportunities as they are in the current environment. I think there’s going to be some really neat deals done here in the near term, and I think that creates some just tremendous opportunities also in terms of encouragement from fundraising. But look, it’s a tough fundraising environment and particularly in buy-out funds, and so based on what we see today, we think in the aggregate across all of the different buy-out funds, they’re going to be somewhat smaller, maybe a little bit the same. But in the aggregate, the dollars are going to be lower than what the predecessors were. We still think this is a very good business for us and we can do a lot. What I’m really encouraged about is the underlying portfolio, and the portfolio has really done well. Revenues are up across the PE space about 12% over the last 12 months. EBITDA continues to grow, up just shy of 10%. Margins have held up strong. From a financing perspective, there’s no major issues in the PE space. Over half of the debt across the portfolio is fixed or hedged, and roughly 95% of the debt has maturities in 2025 or later. That’s all really important, because it tees us up to really generate the types of returns that we’ve done in the past and makes me very encouraged about the $4 billion of net accrued carry on our balance sheet and how we turn that into cash in the coming years. It will be a little slow this year, but feel really good about that $4 billion, and look - giving capital back to our LPs obviously is helpful and is what our teams are very much focused on. Hopefully that gives you some color, Chris.

Okay, yes. Thank you, that’s it for me.

Thanks Chris.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rufus Hone of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open, Rufus.

Hey, good morning. Thanks very much. Wanted to come back to the insurance transaction with Lincoln. Can you speak to how competitive that deal was, and then can you help us with what the FRE contribution from this deal might be and how quickly do you expect to be able to migrate the 20% of general account assets into Carlyle group funds and hit the full FRE run rate contribution you expect there? Thank you.

Rufus, look - I’m a little sensitive on some of these components. We’re also dealing with a public company as the seller, so I’m going to be a little careful in terms of how I answer this. But this sets us up real nicely for growth, particularly in 2024. I think the transaction - very carefully negotiated, I think our team worked really closely with the seller. I don’t want to speak too much in terms of how competitive, but we were uniquely positioned to be able to do the transaction, and especially something of this size and complexity, and really solving the needs of all parties, so I feel good about that. The amount that will directly come into our funds, some of it as quick as this year. Obviously we’ve got to get it closed first, but you would kind of think of that mostly over a two to three-year period. But the one thing I will say is Fortitude has been pretty aggressive in terms of migrating stuff pretty quickly - you know, exclusive of this, already at $9 billion committed or invested into Carlyle strategies, and looking to do the same. First and foremost, though, we’re motivated through our fee arrangement to make sure that Fortitude does well and that we’re a good advisor to them, regardless of whether that comes directly into Carlyle product or into other types of assets. We’re seeking to help them perform really well. Thanks Rufus.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kenneth Worthington of JP Morgan. Your line is open.

Good morning Ken.

Hi, good morning. I wanted to extend on insurance. We’re seeing a much greater integration of insurance in alternative asset managers, and there is some different approaches that your peers have taken to growing insurance. You mentioned that there’s opportunities to grow here. Where does insurance or the insurance opportunity fit in your priority stack for Carlyle growth, and do you think Carlyle has the credit breadth to sort of maximize this insurance opportunity? For Carlyle, Fortitude seems to be the focus of the strategy here. Does that focus on one insurance company really make sense, or to get big, do you need to broaden out the presence? A bunch there, but thank you.

Hey Ken, I’ll start and Harvey can add in. First, we serve a number of insurance investors. We’re an investment advisor, we’re not an insurance company, and so Fortitude, obviously because of our history of strategic investments with them and with our partners, that’s why we tend to in these calls emphasize that, but there’s a number of insurance companies that our credit team is routinely working with for a number of products. The growth in our credit business has been fantastic. We’ve doubled FRE there, doubled the AUM, Mark Jenkins and the team have just done a super job there, and they’re very much focused on the insurance channel and taking advantage of it, and so doing a lot there. Again, you want to be always thinking about how to grow the business and grow it in a disciplined, profitable way, and they’re doing just that. In terms of Fortitude itself, as it continues to scale, I think we’ll also see more steady flows of investments coming off of that, and I think that that also will help Carlyle from a growth and planning and getting things coordinated. But I like where we are, I like kind of the breadth and I like kind of the relationship we have with Fortitude, and again Fortitude has a very deep pipeline of other opportunities and it will pursue that, and from a Carlyle perspective, we’re here to support them. They’re a separate company and there are other investors we work with. I don’t know, Harvey, if you have anything to add to that?

No, I think Curt covered it very well. I would just say again, in my first 80 days or so of being here, it’s clearly obvious the strategic power of being an investor in Fortitude and its alignment with the firm and the growth of our credit business, and so again it’s very high on the priority list but there are a lot of good opportunities. This is one of them.

Great, thank you.

Thank you.

Thanks Ken.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Adam Beatty of UBS. Adam, your line is open.

Thanks very much, good morning. Welcome to Harvey.

Thank you.

Appreciate you’re taking all these questions. I wanted to follow up on the valuation gap, and appreciate all your thoughts so far this morning. But just from the angle of perception, I was wondering if there’s anything that you’ve been hearing in your discussions with LPs or investors in the stock, or even sell side or what have you, that’s just a misperception, where you’re already starting to think, hey, this is something where we’re actually not the way we’re perceived, and we just have to correct that. Thanks very much.

No, I don’t think there’s anything we have to correct. I guess I would say it like this - when I talk to LPs, and I talk to LPs all around the world, I think it’s just crystal clear the brand is way more powerful than the valuation right now, and so that’s why I say, we just have to close that valuation gap. The brand is incredible, and so we just have to work with our teams, we have to execute, we have to grow this opportunity set that Curt and I have been talking about, but the brand is great. It’s disproportionate to the valuation, and the valuation just needs to be as great as the brand.

Got it, thanks very much. Appreciate it.

Sure.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ben Budish of Barclays. Your question please, Ben.

Hi there. Thanks so much for taking the question; and Harvey, great to meet you, if only over the phone here.

Morning Ben, you too.

You know, you guys have talked a lot about the big opportunity set you see going forward, and I think on the last call, I think Curt, you mentioned that you see an opportunity for the company to grow FRE well into the double digits over the medium term. I wanted to ask about how you see private equity fitting in there, just given the step down in expectations for the current vintage of funds. What are your longer term thoughts on how that business can grow from an AUM and FRE perspective?

Ben, good to hear your voice and hear the question. Our private equity business has a long, long track record, not every vintage is going to necessarily be up, and keep in mind that our private equity business is fairly diverse. Look - you’ve got our real estate business, world-class business, we see that we can kind of clearly grow in there. We have an infrastructure and natural resources business that we’re focused on in terms of helping it to grow, and I think that there will be other--and our growth capital business has also done exceptionally well, some fantastic returns. Look, I think there will be other products that we’ll also be exploring and taking advantage of, and from a private wealth standpoint, while still in its infancy in terms of where things are, a lot of the private wealth channel would love to have access to those product sets. That’s something for us to explore more in the longer term, but it’s out there. I think that there is lots of ways that that business can continue to grow, and look - we will also be disciplined and smart in terms of making sure we have the right resources, set the right way with really the asset base, so very optimistic about it.

I appreciate the color, thanks.

Thanks Ben.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chuma Nwankwo of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead, Chuma.

Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking the question, and welcome Harvey.

Hey, nice to meet you.

Hi there, nice to meet you too. I’m standing in for Michael Cyprys, by the way - he’s just tied up on another call. Just wonder if I could go back to the Fortitude transaction and talk a little bit about the opportunity you see there with the transition of the general account assets. I think in the past, you’ve previously talked about sort of mid-teens, and now you’re talking about 20% here, so nice to see that, I guess, above expectations. I guess the question is, how should we think about that 20%? Would you be disappointed if you didn’t do better than that? Also going back to the question about white space, what products do you see those assets potentially transitioning into that you have today, and where could there be potential for more product development to increase the scope for more of these insurance assets to be deployed? Thank you.

Let me start on that. On the 20%, I think you’re assuming a degree of--more degree of precision than how we think about it. It’s roughly 20%. Obviously we’re looking to assist Fortitude in doing what’s right for Fortitude, and if that can be more, then we’ll collectively together with Fortitude to be more. If it should be a tad less, that’s also the right answer. We’re looking to work with Fortitude on that. The assets that can come in - look, I mean, we’re going to be--again, what’s the right way to approach and that, and as I think I previously said, I think we can start to transition some of that quickly, and some of it will take a longer period of time, but it’s about really kind of helping them from that perspective. You know, we’ve talked about the other products in terms of white space, and from a long term growth perspective, I’d just reiterate that we can see 2024 and following years really being a return to growth in FRE and continue to feel good about our $4 billion of net accrued carry and how that will generate and provide higher distributable earnings on a longer term basis. Hopefully that addresses your question.

Thank you for the color, appreciate it.

Thank you.

Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference back to Daniel Harris for closing remarks. Sir?

Hey everyone, again on behalf of the team here, Curt and Dan and everyone, just want to thank you for participating on the call. Again, for those of you I know, great to catch up again, and for those of you I haven’t met yet, I look forward to catching up with you shortly. Again, thanks for your interest. Have a great day.

This concludes today’s conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.