At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the Cadence Design Systems' second quarter 2014 earnings conference call. I will now hand the call over to Alan Lindstrom, Group Director of Investor Relations for Cadence Design Systems. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator, and welcome to our earnings conference call for the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The webcast of this call can be accessed through our website, cadence.com, and will be archived through September 12, 2014. A copy of today's prepared remarks will also be available on our website at the conclusion of today's call. With us today are Lip-Bu Tan, President and CEO; and Geoff Ribar, Senior Vice President and CFO. Please note that today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements and that our actual results may differ materially from those expectations. For information on the factors that could cause a difference in our results, please refer to our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These include Cadence's most recent reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q, including the company's future filings and the cautionary statements regarding forward-looking statements in the earnings release issued today. Note that we also filed a second quarter 10-Q this afternoon. In addition to the financial results prepared in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles or GAAP, we will also present certain non-GAAP financial measures today. Cadence management believes that in addition to using GAAP results in evaluating our business, it can also be useful to measure results using certain non-GAAP financial measures. Investors and potential investors are encouraged to review the reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures with their most direct comparable GAAP financial results, which can be found in the quarterly earnings section of the Investor Relations portion of our website. A copy of today's press release, dated July 21, 2014, for the quarter ended June 28, 2014 and related financial tables can also be found in the Investor Relations portion of our website. Now, I'll turn the call over to Lip-Bu.

Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us. I am pleased with the strong financial results that Cadence delivered in Q2. To summarize, total revenue was $379 million. Non-GAAP operating margin was 23%, and operating cash flow was $69 million. Today, we are also making some adjustments to our outlook for the fiscal year, which Geoff will discuss in a few minutes. Before talking about our Q2 highlights, I want to say a few words about the environment and review the key points of our strategy. I’m happy to report that the environment has generally improved since the beginning of the year. Overall, the semiconductor industry is healthier and the growth of system companies is expanding our opportunities. As most of you know, system design enablement is our strategy to deliver the technology necessary for the integrated system and SOC design, with the end product in mind. Core EDA is at the heart of this strategy, and is a great business for us. We are winning with the winning customers, because of our increased focus in areas including digital and advanced [modification.] We are also excited about the high-quality differentiated IP business we are building, and the growth opportunities it offers. We continue to expand beyond the SOC to provide innovative solutions for system interconnect and analysis; hardware, software codesign; and system-level IP. We aim to expand our leadership in system design enablement by focusing on leading semiconductor and system customers and ecosystem partners, developing or acquiring flagship products in key areas to drive growth and leading at advanced nodes. The success of our strategy is enabled by hiring and nurturing top talent, providing the industry’s best products, and laser focus on customer success. Our strategy is working, and you can see it in our results. Based on these…

Thanks, Lip-Bu, and good afternoon everyone. Now, I will review the results for the second quarter, present our outlook for Q3, and update our outlook for 2014. Cadence produced strong operating results in Q2. Total revenue was $379 million, up slightly from the prior quarter, compared to $362 million for the year ago quarter. Revenue mix for the geographies was 44% for the Americas, 23% for Asia, 22% for EMEA, and 11% for Japan. Revenue mix by the product group was 21% for functional verification, 30% for digital IC design and signoff, 28% for custom IC design, 11% for system interconnect and analysis, and 10% for IP. Total costs and expenses on a non-GAAP basis were $290 million, compared to $295 million for Q1 and $277 million for the year ago quarter. In Q2, we incurred a $10 million gap charge for our voluntary retirement program that will provide cost savings going forward. Headcount was 6,044, up 209 from Q1, attributable to hiring in R&D and technical field positions and the acquisition of Jasper Design Automation. Non-GAAP operating margin was 23% , compared to 22% for Q1 and 24% for the year ago quarter. GAAP net income per share was $0.08, non-GAAP net income per share was $0.21 compared to $0.20 for Q1 and $0.21 for the year ago quarter. Operating cash flow was $69 million, compared to $28 million for Q1 and $75 million for the year ago quarter. Total DSOs was 26 days, compared to 27 for Q1 and 24 for the year ago quarter. Capital expenditures were $11 million. Cash and short-term investments were $655 million at quarter end, compared to $630 million for the prior quarter. During the quarter, we used $136 million of cash for acquisitions. We repurchased 768,000 shares for $12.5 million. We borrowed…

[Operator instructions.] Our first question comes from the line of Jay Vleeschhouwer with Griffin Securities.

Question first about the Jasper acquisition. When you bought Tensilica a year ago, you were providing then for 2013 the incremental revenues and bookings you were expecting from Tensilica. We’re hoping now that perhaps for Jasper you’ll do something similar for 2014 in terms of the incremental bookings and revenue contribution. Also, with respect to the duration of only 2.2 years, that’s unusually low. Could you elaborate at all on the customer mix in terms of any geographic or product component that weighed on the duration?

On Jasper, I think as we said, the majority of the bookings increase and revenue increase was related to Jasper. I’m pretty sure you can do the math on that. Happy to help, but I think you’ve got the basic components. The 2.1 to 2.2 is really just a mix in the current quarter. We don’t expect any change for the year, and nothing unusual happened, from our perspective.

Over the last couple of years, the company has had some good momentum in a number of areas, including system interconnect or PCB, custom IC, and hardware, including the last quarter, albeit at the expense of margin. When you look out over the next couple of years, or beyond, what do you think might be, from a product perspective, the next big thing or things, as incremental growth drivers. For instance, last month at [DEC], we heard, in various Cadence presentations, frequent references to free silicon and front end as technical areas of interest for you. You’ve mentioned signoff a number of times today. What do you think, aside from the areas we already talked about, might be the next particularly incremental areas for you for revenue?

A couple of points to just highlight. First of all, as you mentioned, we are moving toward a system design enablement approach, and basically it’s really driving the system design approach based on the view on EDA, on the system level view, providing the true IP software packaging board assembly and the system-level IP. So, really looking at the entire system and product in mind. With that, EDA is really the heart of it, and we are doubled down and laser focused on that. We have a whole series of good products coming out in the signoff area, like Tempus/Voltus, and now we announced the Quantus. And clearly we continue to drive significant improvement in the digital front. And then likewise, we have also doubled and tripled down on the verification side, because that is where the time to market challenges are, and that’s also the complexity of the design. And then we have that whole development verification suite that includes all the way from hardware, and the formal analysis, like the Jasper, that is very relevant to us. A lot of complex SOC and processor related design is a must-have, and we really strengthened that. And we also have also very significantly improved the [incisive] part. In fact, this Q2 is one of the best quarters for us. And all in all, it ties in to the design and verification approach. And then with that, clearly we have a really strong foundation, especially in the digital front. We have a lot of design wins, along that direction, and meanwhile, mixed signal is the digital and analog combined, and then optimized for that. We’re making great progress with the EDA. A lot of momentum, customer signup for it, and that continues to drive differentiation in the mixed signal. As you know, most of the SOCs are mixed signal related, and that really plays into our strength. I think IP also is a driving engine for us. So all in all, I think clearly we are excited about EDA industry, growing faster than the overall semiconductor industry. We believe we can outgrow the industry based on our leadership position in various EDA products and also extend into the system level applications. So overall, we are optimistic in our product offering.

As I’m sure you know, Synopsis with IC Compiler 2 is introducing the idea of node-based pricing. A range of functionality and capacity according to the node usage by their customers. Is that sort of node-based pricing perhaps only in digital IC, if not elsewhere, something that might be of interest for you as well?

I think first of all, we pay a lot of attention on the ICC2 and their announcement. And they are very strong competitors. We always respect them. And meanwhile, we continue to focus on our offering, especially in the digital front. Clearly, we’re making great progress in the digital front. Our commitment into the FinFET design, and clearly we have multiple wins in the digital front. And then we mentioned about one customers using the Cadence IP and implementation tool to drive the industry’s first production foundry FinFET design. And currently, we have over 25 new FinFET design projects underway in Q2, and then we are already starting with multiple foundry partners on 10 nanometer. And clearly the signoff, as I mentioned in my script, Tempus at more than 30 customers signed up for it and Voltus, 25. And then the Broadcom and a few others. And then with the Quantus coming up. So all in all, we are kind of focused on innovation, focused on customer wins, and then focused on the advanced node. And we will continue to just focus on execution and then make our customers successful.

Our next question comes from the line of Tom Diffely with D.A. Davidson.

First, I guess Geoff, you talked about the midpoint of the EPS guidance for the full year going down. Say it’s going down from 97 to 94. So you talked about the hardware margins being a little impactful there, the share count. But I didn’t necessarily hear you say what part Jasper plays in that.

Yeah, Jasper’s immaterial on the results for 2014, and it’s immaterial because of the merger accounting and the deferred revenue impact on the merger accounting. So the two issues are mostly the gross margin on hardware, and secondly, the increased share count related to the calculated dilution on the convertible notes.

How long do you think it typically takes from a quarter basis to get to kind of the full operating model from Jasper? Is that a 3-4 quarter trend?

Yeah, it depends on the particular acquisition and the particular makeup of their deferred revenue. So it will take some time. We said 2015 will be accretive for Jasper. I think that’s probably the most important factor.

And then maybe just a quick thought process on why you increased the share repurchase versus maybe the initiation of a dividend. What were the pros and cons?

You know, our board and our management team goes through a process of looking at our capital needs, our cash flow, and basically we decided that we were going to do the stock repurchase. We don’t want to discuss obviously the details of that calculation, but again, we’re quite comfortable with our cash flow, quite comfortable with our business, and so comfortable with proceeding with what we did.

Clearly as you heard from us, system design enablement, the strategy we have and we are executing toward that. We have a lot of momentum. And like Geoff mentioned earlier, we looked at the capital requirements, looked at the cash flow. We have a very strong cash flow going forward, and we discussed with our board. We felt that this is the right thing to do in terms of buying back more shares, and that serves the shareholders well. And that’s kind of our decision.

Also, when you gave the $37.5 million per quarter number, does that mean you’re going to try to be fairly linear with the spend, or are you still going to be opportunistic?

Yes, we are.

But you talked about how the environment has improved since the beginning of the year, with a couple of different customer sets. It looks like that hasn’t really translated into the guidance for the full year at all. Maybe you could talk about that, how these trends play out over time, and when you would think you’d see some kind of an increase to your bottom line?

I think a couple of things. I mentioned earlier in the environment, overall it’s good, because of mobile, video, wearables, internet of things, and cloud. And also the design complexity. And then the other part, because of our much improved product portfolio, and we are excited, looking forward. And also, we have a lot of momentum and wins in the digital verification. And also, Jasper is a wonderful acquisition. Great talent has come onboard. It’s a must-have. And so overall, I think we positive on the overall view, and then meanwhile, as you know, this is a [ratable] business, and sometimes hardware and IP are a little bit lumpy. But overall, I think we continue to execute, to plan. We like what we see, and we just have to be very focused on execution and win the customer and support them in their success.

And Tom, just to be clear, our software is ahead of our plan, from the end of the year to now.

And then maybe finally, just an update on Japan? It’s been a bit of a headwind over the last many quarters. It sounds like it’s stabilized a bit, but maybe a little more color?

Yeah, I mean, Japan is going to fluctuate, as I think we said a couple of quarters in a row. It’s kind of bumping along on the bottom, and we’ve seen it stabilize. But there’s going to be some fluctuations from quarter to quarter with us for Japan.

Our next question comes from the line of Sterling Auty from JPMorgan.

A couple of questions. One, just start off administrative-wise. Geoff, can you repeat the cash flow guidance that you gave, and the rationale behind it?

Yeah, the cash flow guidance is down about $30 million at midpoint. The three major items that are playing into that are Jasper is certainly playing in. Again, we have deferred revenue. We collected that cash up front, but we have expenses. Secondly, the voluntary retirement program. And the third is the gross margin impact on the hardware business. Sterling Auty - JPMorgan Chase & Company : What was the voluntary part of that again?

We did a voluntary retirement program here in the U.S. to allow people to take a voluntary retirement. It will benefit our expenses on a go forward basis. Sterling Auty - JPMorgan Chase & Company : The gross margin on the hardware side, how much of this is just where you are in the product cycle, and is there anything to read into here that you’re talking about lower gross margins for the back half? Does that suggest that either the timing of the next upgrade has shifted or that you would expect hardware gross margins to continue to be under pressure at whatever time the new version does come out?

I’ll start, and then Lip-Bu will take the rest of the question. Our hardware business has actually continued to be pretty strong. We’ve taken some deals that we think make a lot of sense to us, from top customers, and foreign customers. And you know, we’ve actually shipped more volume than we’ve done previously in the first half of the year. We expect to ship more in the second half of the year. But the business is competitive, and we’ve seen some pricing pressure, and that is impacting overall revenue for hardware, which will be down slightly this year, and margins.

I think just a few things to add. First of all, the Palladium XP2, released less than one year ago, shipping in high volumes. And then the XP2, we have significantly better performance and productivity advantage. And then we continue to drive success in our top customer and also system and also some of the new verticals. And so I think we continue to do well. In fact, the first half is up. And then we put together really top talent and driving this whole complex supercomputer platform. And then our new platform is on our way, and we are excited about it, but meanwhile, we are focused on selling our Palladium XP2 and when the time comes, we will announce our new products. But so far, we’ve been laser focused on selling and supporting our customers. Clearly, the top tier customer, we continue to increase and we add on, and so overall, it’s a very important platform and it ties in very well into our system development suite. And that has continued to clearly proliferate towards the system and also some of the new verticals. Sterling Auty - JPMorgan Chase & Company : Lip-Bu, you mentioned a number of times some initial design wins as well as both power… So both Tempus and Voltus. And just wondering if you could describe what you think the market share dynamics in those segments are looking at? In other words, are you picking up incremental new customers? Or are these expansions within existing customers?

I think digital is a very important focus for us, and clearly some of the new products we announced in the signoff, Tempus is very well received, Voltus is very well received. And we just announced the Quantus in the QRC side. And clearly, we have a lot of adoptions. Tempus, over 30. And then the Voltus is over 25. And then clearly, we mentioned last quarter we have won big wins, and in terms of the design flow in the digital, we continue to have that, and we have multiple new design wins, because clearly, our product is coming up really, really strong. And then also, tying in with our advanced nodes, in the 16, 14, now moving into 10 nanometer. So clearly, it’s an area that we are really focused on, and then also tie into the custom analog, mixed signal. And that’s why I think too it will play into our strength, and most of the SOC are mixed signal. And the other part of the equation that helps us a lot is in the ARM, relationship. Clearly, the 64-bit deployment and a lot of customers are engaging, and that gives us a lot of window into our performance, and then leading to some of the digital [displacements].

Our next question comes from the line of Monica Garg with Pacific Crest Securities.

My first question is, you heard about Broadcom’s decision to sell the baseband unit. Could you maybe talk about if that has any impact on your business?

I think clearly we are not going to comment on any of our specific customer business or strategy. And so I think we’ll stop right there.

Then Lip-Bu, you talked about [FDSOI] model and design in your comment. Could you maybe talk about the design activity you are seeing in the FDSOI area? And then does it impact in any positive way your business?

Clearly, we are engaging with our foundries and then based on the customer requirements. So we work very intensively with our customer. If the customer decided to go advanced node in FinFET we support them to [unintelligible] that with the foundry partners. If they decided to move on to the FDSOI, we clearly support that. In my remarks, I mentioned about the DDR4, because of customer requirements, moving to the FDSOI process, and we definitely support and enable that.

If I heard it correctly, you talked about a Palladium hybrid product in your comments.

That’s correct.

Could you maybe kind of talk about what is that product?

Sure, happy to share with you. This is the newest user model, to help the customer more. It basically provided our Palladium engine and platform, extended into the hybrid. That basically enabled a better processor software development. So in a way, while your silicon is still in development, you can start using our Palladium model to apply into the OS, the firmware, the software stack, and so in a way, you save a couple of months. You know, one of the customer highlighted that it saved them six months in terms of the codesign hardware and software together. And that is a huge, huge time to market advantage for the customer. And we introduced that, and a couple of key customers love it. We embrace and are helping support them. Anything to save them on time to market is huge for them.

Our next question comes from the line of Mahesh Sanganeria with RBC Capital Markets.

I just had a follow up on your Tempus and Voltus wins. Can you give us more color as to the accounts where you’re getting the wins? What’s the driver? Is it new evaluation, or you’re just displacing a competitor?

I think a couple of things. One, these are very new products we announced, in the later part of last year. This is massive parallelism, and then scale all the way to 100 CPU. We introduced them in the later part of last year. The response has been overwhelmingly positive, and on the Tempus side, we have over 30 customers, paying customers, and they are engaging heavily on their signoff. Same thing with Voltus. If I recall correctly, we introduced that in Q4 of last year, and we already have more than 25 customers using it. This is very significant. And then thirdly, we just announced our QRC. This is the abstraction offering on the signoff, and it’s also massive parallel architecture. This is very important. Customers right now are evaluating it. And so I think we are really focused on the digital platform, initially focused on signoff, and then now we are working on the next generation in the digital implementation, place [unintelligible] and synthesis. Stay tuned, and we’re going to have a lot more exciting coming up. And we doubled, tripled down on the digital implementation side. And customers love it, and we highlighted one of the Tempus users is Broadcom, in their sub-20 nanometer floor, and this is very significant. So I think we are making great inroads into the digital front.

If I can just follow up on that one. I mean, if I look at the timing signoff, I mean, [unintelligible], and I don’t know what the market size is, can you give us a sense of are you talking about the power signoff and timing signoff, what the market sizes are, and what part of market can you have in, let’s say, a couple of years. I’m sure that for the timing signoff, you’re starting from a very low basis. And some sense of the dollar number will be very, very helpful.

I think clearly it’s a big [term], and digital and mix signal also impact into the whole mixed signal design. And so all in all, we only provide right now the 2014 guidance. But clearly, it’s a big opportunity, and that’s why we could recruit all the best talent we can find in the marketplace. And this is very critical in terms of the digital design implement. And it’s a big [time] market, as I can say.

Our next question comes from the line of Krish Sankar of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Number one, Geoff, you mentioned that the gross margins were down due to hardware. Is it over a couple of customers? Is it more than one or two customers that’s bringing down the hardware gross margins?

Yeah, we just said generally that the business is competitive on the gross margin perspective. Again, we’re quite happy with the deals we’re taking. We think the deals make sense and are with great customers. But you know, the market’s competitive. We haven’t given specifics on which customers, etc.

So I mean, it’s not a complete surprise that hardware is dilutive to gross margin. But if I take a longer term view, if you’re going to get more footprint and systems, how will your gross margin and operating margins trend over the next few years as you get more systems footprint?

Yeah, we’re only guiding 2014 right now. We’ll give you more view when we guide 2015 in the January timeframe.

I think you guys kind of highlighted how emulation is being used by the software guys. It looks like it’s being used to that software. Is the primary requirement for emulator to be used to bring software up, is it primarily just throughput, or is there something else too?

A couple of points. Clearly, the hardware emulation is very good for verification, finding bugs in the design, in a very effective way. And then meanwhile, we mentioned this Palladium hybrid. Actually, it’s helping us on the software side, so we can develop faster on that. And then we’ve also just announced Protium. This is the FPGA offering. And so I think this is something that will tie in very well with our entire system development suite. And this is critical in terms of time to market for our customers. It’s a fast-growing area. You know, Jasper is a great acquisition for us, because of all the complex SOC, that are processor related. And it’s a must have. Customers request us to buy that. And so I think we tied it all together on the whole verification suite of offerings.

Early in the year, it seemed like there was quite a bit of challenges with FinFET. And if you talk to different folks, it seems like, depending on whom you speak to, it’s either improving or it’s still status quo in terms of the performance. Can you help characterize, over the last six months, how do you describe the progress in FinFET and the program in FDSOI. I’m just trying to get a sense of are they mutually exclusive, or as FinFET gets delayed more, is it going to be more focused on FDSOI?

It’s a very good question, and in fact you will get different answers from different customers. But I think we’re very much focused on working with our leading customers, the winning customers. And clearly, FinFET is the way to go in the advanced nodes, and in the 14, 16, and 10 nanometer. And so a couple of our key customers requested us to support them. And that’s why we have more than 25 new FinFET design projects with our leading customer. And in Q2, we see the development activity increased a lot on that. And then saying that, you know, we also had a couple of customers decide to use the FDSOI for the 28 and 20 and then some go beyond that. So I think we are open minded, and we don’t have any buyers, one way or the other. Our optimal objective is to serve our customer in terms of the most complex design, and then make it optimized for the foundry that they select, and then we work with the foundry partners to make sure that we provide the most high-yield performance based on our design tool in IP. That’s the most important.

Our next question comes from the line of Rich Valera with Needham & Company. Rich Valera - Needham & Company: Geoff, just wanted to clarify that you said that the mix had actually shifted toward software and away from revenue, broadly speaking, in your business. Is that correct?

It shifted to software revenue from hardware revenue. Hardware revenue would be a little bit down this year. Rich Valera - Needham & Company : Right. So all things equal, that should have a positive impact on margins, but obviously you’re guiding the other way. So I guess the pricing pressure in hardware is actually more than offsetting that mix shift. Is that a fair statement?

That’s correct. Rich Valera - Needham & Company : And then a lot of questions around the hardware margin. And I think as I understand it in emulation, it’s sort of pretty straightforward that the cost per gate in emulation is directly tied, generally speaking, to the silicon in the box. So if you come out with a next-generation box, generally you have much higher density silicon. And I don’t want to put words in your mouth, but it’s something just substantially higher density. That brings down your cost per gate quite a bit, and so sort of mathematically... Get your thoughts on that. \

We’re obviously not guiding 2015 at this stage, but yes, that’s the general Moore’s Law benefit of semiconductors. Rich Valera - Needham & Company : Is there any reason to think that you’re going to have a next-generation box. You’ve acknowledged that. You’re going to have next-gen chips in that. The margins on that shouldn’t be materially better than the margins you’re getting today on hardware. I know you don’t want to get specific, but it’s just axiomatic that it should be.

Rich, we’ll talk about that in the future.

Our next question comes from the line of Ruben Roy with Piper Jaffray.

I wanted to follow up on the FinFET FDSOI discussion. It sounds like your design projects accelerated in Q2. I think you said 25 new since that project. And I was wondering, in listening to some of the equipment companies recently, it sounds like foundry ramps of 16, 14 nanometer nodes are a little bit slower than previously anticipated. But you haven’t seen that yet in actual design activity. Do you think at this point this something that could cause some short term impact, or is this just been a longer term trend that plays itself out and the longer term trend is up and to the right. Would love to hear your thoughts on that.

We watch that very closely. Clearly, we heard some of the foundries’ announcements in terms of delay. And meanwhile, on the design front, it’s always ahead enough that manufacturing, we see the increase in the design activities, especially in the 64 bit related area, and also the FinFET customer engagement has increased. I think over time, clearly, the volume production will be sometime next year. And clearly, the leading foundries are very focused on getting that done. And a lot of customers depend on that. So I think I’m optimistic that things will work out. And clearly, the foundry partners are very, very focused on that, and make sure that yield and performance. The test shipment of the [involvement] in the design, in activity, increased, at least from our visibility.

On the FDSOI side, you talked about 28 nanometer obviously, and some of the IP that you’re bringing to market. You talked about 20 nanometer. I’m wondering, recently with some of the activity that you’re seeing out there, has there been discussions or requests to you to start thinking about and creating libraries for 14 nanometer FDSOI?

The answer to you is yes. We have customers request that. We are working with them. And so clearly, supporting the customer success is the most important for us. Make sure that our [unintelligible] and IP optimized for that process and that approach. And clearly, the customer has demand us for doing it. Clearly we are supporting that, and so to answer your question, yes, there is an increase in the activity of FDSOI.

And that was our final question. I will now turn the call over to Cadence’s president and CEO, Lip-Bu Tan, for closing remarks.