Felipe Dubernet
Chief Financial Officer
Yes. Regarding EBITDA margin, as you mentioned, yes, we have had a nice expansion in terms of EBITDA margin because we had overall better prices than last year in the categories we suffered from mix effect, that is logical when you sell more nonalcoholic than alcoholic products, of course, we will have an impact on price per ton, okay? Also unit cost help us during the first quarter. Going forward, your question, I repeat what I have answered to Fernando Olvera in the previous question. At the end, we are suffering from a very volatile scenario. We are trying to do everything to compensate this new input costs, but we need to be careful because it's a balance between volume and price. As I mentioned, we have increased prices in Chile end of March, beginning of April in all the categories. And also, we are searching for additional efficiencies in order to compensate the effect. But it's very volatile and it's too early until the conflict is not reaching an end and still we are suffering with this volatility in oil prices and also aluminum prices and other packaging materials, as I said, where it is difficult to do a proper forecast. [indiscernible] of course, we have scenarios internally. But so far with the price increases we did, more or less, we are able to compensate. However, as I mentioned, we could face or we could find a more soft consumer in terms of the consumer not only consume or buy our products, but have other needs, for example, to run the car. And now he's paying more for the gasoline for his car. So we need to be very careful. Regarding Argentina volumes, yes, the first quarter, I would say, was soft, still soft. We decreased our volumes in nonalcoholic, as we mentioned, mid-single digit. However, the first quarter of last year was a very high comp. In the following quarters, I'm sure we will be seeing a growth when you compare quarter 2 against quarter 2, quarter 3 against quarter 3 and quarter 4 against quarter 4. And this is related because the last 9 months of last year were particularly weak in Argentina. Now I think we face a more stable macroeconomic situation since. However, with a lot of inflationary pressures, I would say. We have high inflation in Argentina. We have been able so far to increase prices in line with inflation as we kept a lag from last year. Last year, with -- our prices increases were below inflation. So overall, in Argentina, I would say we have more favorable comps. However, we don't see an extraordinary good recovery. However, it's more stable so far. Constanza González Muñoz I have a follow-up question. Can you give us a sensitivity in EBITDA according to the volatility in prices in oil -- oil prices? Yes, I would say in terms of the impact on oil prices, we have direct effects that are completely direct because all the contracts and the drivers are particularly linked to oil prices, such as distribution cost. This has a significant impact and other costs such as gas that is very energy intensive. I would say that each $30 per barrel of oil increase, we are talking something like $30 million direct impact of oil prices, but this could be compensated on the other hand by the appreciation of the Chilean peso. Each 1% of appreciation of the Chilean peso is about $4 million. So if we have 10% of appreciation of the Chilean peso, we are talking about significant magnitude to compensate. But this has the original effect, but because at the end, it will depend how this would evolve in terms of the volatility we are seeing today.