Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. And welcome to the Century Communities, Inc. First Quarter 2025 earnings conference call. At this time, all lines are in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session. If at any time during this call you require immediate assistance, please press star zero for the operator. I would now like to turn the conference over to Tyler Langton, SVP of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Good afternoon. Thank you for joining us today for Century Communities for the first quarter 2025. Before the call begins, I would like to remind everyone that certain statements made during this call may constitute forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management's current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described or implied in the forward-looking statements. Certain of these risks and uncertainties can be found under the heading risk factors in the company's latest 10-Ks as supplemented by our latest 10-Q and other SEC filings. We undertake no duty to update our forward-looking statements. Additionally, certain non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed on this conference call. The company's presentation of this information is not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information presented in accordance with GAAP. Hosting the call today are Dale Francescon, Executive Chairman, Rob Francescon, Chief Executive Officer and President, and Scott Dixon, Chief Financial Officer. Following today's prepared remarks, we will open up the lines for questions. With that, I'll turn the call over to Dale.

Thank you, Tyler, and good afternoon, everyone. Over the past few months, we have seen an increase in economic uncertainty, interest rate volatility, and eroding consumer confidence, which have contributed to a slower than typical spring selling season. Our absorption rate in the first quarter was weaker than we had expected, coupled with constraints on affordability, have led to elongated sales cycles and caused some homebuyers to pause. That said, we still firmly believe there is underlying demand for affordable new homes supported by solid demographic trends. Despite the current headwinds, our deliveries of 2,284 homes were only 3% below year-ago levels while our average sales price declined by approximately 1% on a year-over-year basis. During the quarter, we focused on balancing pace and price, while managing our direct construction costs and incentive levels. As a result, we were able to maintain relatively stable homebuilding gross margins of 20.1% excluding purchase price accounting which eased by only 80 basis points on a sequential basis. Our first quarter net new contracts totaled 2,692 homes, a 6% decline versus the healthy levels we saw in the year ago and a 33% increase over first quarter 2023 levels. Our absorption pace averaged 2.8 in the first quarter 2025 and increased sequentially in both February and March, likely benefiting from both seasonality and the decline in mortgage rates over much of the first quarter. So far in April, our absorption rate is trending below first quarter 2025. As we mentioned last quarter, given our lot pipeline in community count, we have the ability to grow our deliveries by approximately 10% annually over the next several years. That said, we are not focused on growth for the sake of growth alone and will look to balance pace and price at the community level to optimize…

Thank you, Dale, and good afternoon, everyone. As expected, our incentive on closed homes increased to approximately 900 basis points in the first quarter 2025, up from roughly 800 basis points in the fourth quarter 2024. Our incentives on new orders in the first quarter also averaged approximately 900 basis points. Looking forward, we continue to expect incentive levels to be the largest driver of changes to our gross margins in the near term and anticipate second quarter incentives to increase by up to another 200 basis points due to the current conditions that are weighing on order activity. We had continued success in controlling our costs in the first quarter, with both our direct construction and finished lot costs on the homes we deliver roughly flat on a sequential basis. On a year-over-year basis, our direct construction cost declined by 4%. During the first quarter, our cycle times remained at approximately four months and we have not seen any impacts from immigration reform on our labor base so far. While we are performing well on the cost side, we are still taking actions to further streamline our cost structure. Given the slower than expected spring selling season, in mid-April, we made the difficult decision to rightsize our workforce along with implementing other cost savings programs to lower our fixed costs. The savings from these initiatives will flow through cost of home sales, SG&A, and financial services, and we would expect to see more of a benefit in the third and fourth quarters of this year compared to the second quarter. We ended the first quarter with a community count of 318, up 26% on a year-over-year basis. While it is still early and also recognized the 28% growth in our community count in 2024, we currently expect our year-end…

Thank you, Rob. In the first quarter of 2025, pre-tax income was $53 million and net income was $39 million or $1.26 per diluted share. Adjusted net income was $42 million or $1.36 per diluted share. EBITDA for the quarter was $73 million and adjusted EBITDA was $76 million. Home sales revenues for the first quarter were $884 million, down 4% versus the prior year quarter on lower deliveries and average sales price. Our first quarter average sales price of $387,000 decreased by 1% on a year-over-year basis primarily due to a higher level of incentives. Our deliveries of 2,284 homes in the first quarter declined by 3% on a year-over-year basis and were impacted by our decision to manage our starts at a lower level over the past two quarters with elevated mortgage rates and economic uncertainty also weighing on order activity. For the second quarter 2025, we expect our deliveries to range from 2,300 to 2,500 homes, assuming an absorption pace similar to first quarter 2025 levels of 2.8. Looking out to the back half of the year, we would expect further sequential increases in our deliveries in both the third and fourth quarters of 2025. At quarter-end, our backlog of sold homes was 1,258 valued at $521 million, with an average price of $414,000. While the average price of our first quarter backlog was above the average sales price of our first quarter deliveries, this difference is largely due to mix, including the percentage of Century Complete Homes. In the first quarter, adjusted homebuilding gross margin was 21.6%, compared to 22.9% in the fourth quarter 2024. In GAAP homebuilding gross margin, 19.9%, up from the fourth quarter 2024. And GAAP homebuilding gross margin was 19.9%, versus 20.6% the prior quarter. Additionally, purchase price accounting associated with our…

Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. Should you have a question, please press star one on your touch-tone phone. You will hear a prompt your hand has been raised. Should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star two. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any keys. One moment, please, for your first question. Your first question comes from Carl Reichardt of BTIG. Your line is already open.

Great. Thanks. Hi, guys. Nice to talk to you. Thanks for taking the question. Hey, Carl. So I'm looking at your absorption rate between communities and complete, and complete was up, I think, if I've got it right, 4%. But the core businesses, the regionals were down 38% during the quarter. And wondering if you'd like to talk about why that difference was so stark if the macro is kind of impacted everything the same. Is that a function of the aggressiveness of some of your entry-level peers in their pricing and incentive structure to further into the spring and into the summer?

Yeah, Carl. Great question. I appreciate it. So, you know, a lot of dynamics that obviously are interplaying between our Century brand as well as our Century Complete. I think one of the benefits that we've always had on the Century Complete brand that I think you're seeing run through some of those numbers is just the fact that we are playing in some markets where there quite frankly is not as much direct from other builders. And I think that's really played itself through in a little bit more of a stable absorption profile here in the first quarter. But more specifically, Carl, just real quick. You know, when we look at it though on the community side, you know, Texas really had the lowest performance at 2.1 absorption. And you know, part of that is some things that we're working on fixing, of course. But that was really one of the outliers that dropped things down as well.

Okay. And when you're thinking about moving product going forward, just to maintain the pace that you've got, and I think you said April was slower than Q1 already. Are you looking more aggressively at direct price cuts on finished units or near-finished units versus incentives? Or versus, like, interest rate buy downs and other kinds of non-base price cut incentives? And maybe you can talk about if that mix is shifting. Thanks.

Well, homes that are complete, that are unsold, we're definitely moving both with interest rate buy downs as well as price reduction. So, you know, that's why we've messaged here that our margins could be off in Q2 based on another 200 up to another 200 basis points in incentives to move that product. So, yes, those are being discounted higher if they're complete and unsold.

Great. I appreciate it. Thanks, fellas.

Absolutely.

Your next question comes from Jay McCanless of Wedbush. Your line is already open.

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my questions. So I'm just trying to walk through the closing guidance map here. 2,285 closings, I think, for this quarter, and then you're talking roughly somewhere between 2,400 for the second quarter and then a pretty big jump, I guess, in your cadence in the back half of the year. I mean, normally, you would see closings go up in the back half, but if you're seeing this much headwind, what makes you think that's gonna happen? Is it gonna be community growth or something else? I guess just kinda walk us through how you're thinking about the back half from a volume perspective.

Sure. Jay, I think you actually hit the nail on the head. The majority of our community count growth will really come online here in the second and the third quarter. From a sales perspective. That's what we're counting a new community come online, which is really support the higher closing in the back half of the year even with kind of generally flat absorptions embedded within our guide.

And then did you and I apologize if you said this already, but did you quantify what type of SG&A savings you think you might get from some of the layoffs that have happened?

So the savings from the various cost reduction activities, which are, of course, not just specific to the reduction in force, will flow through a handful of different line items including cost of sales, SG&A, as well as the financial services line items. From an SG&A perspective, those cost savings are incorporated in the guide for the full year of SG&A that we provided.

And then just go ahead.

No. Go ahead, Jay. Sorry.

Alright. No. I was just gonna ask in terms of pricing, I guess, any help you can give us there in terms of some of the level of the price cuts you're having to make and also with the buy downs that you all are doing that you talked about, I guess, is it still five and a half to five and three quarters? Is that kind of the sweet spot? Where people get interested, or are you having to buy it down even further right now? Just given some of the other affordability challenges that are out there?

So generally speaking for the first quarter that average rate that we were buying down to has been pretty consistent in the mid-fives. Now as we move forward and obviously with the volatility that's occurred in rates here, that cost could obviously continue to increase. I think generally speaking from an incentive standpoint, we've been running kind of, you know, 55% price, 45% incentive or excuse me, mortgage and I think you'll see that generally continue to play itself out over that additional 200 basis points that we currently see with how April itself has played itself out.

Okay. Great. Thanks so much for taking my question.

Absolutely. Thanks, Jay.

Your next question comes from Alan Ratner of Zelman and Associates. Your line is already open.

Guys. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. Hi, Alan. I was hoping just to better understand a little bit the timing of the incentive increase. You mentioned second quarter of expecting it to be up about 200 basis points. On the other hand, it sounds like April has been a softer month from an order perspective. So were these incentives increases done kind of more recently in recent days in response to the continued softness and sales, or were they done earlier in the month and, you know, we still haven't seen, you know, a response, I guess, or at least an acceleration, from that.

Yeah. Alan, I think the easiest way to articulate it is obviously there's been a change here that we've seen in the consumer profile. At least at the volatility post-March, right, in the early April post, certain that that volatility has been in the market has caused the consumer to pause. And so where we're at currently, we believe we're anticipating some additional incentives that we've recently put in place in order to achieve the absorptions that we're looking for into Q2.

Got it. So it's more of a prospective look based on kind of the continued volatility, I guess, in the market. So I guess that kind of somewhat answers my next question, but it sounds like for your full-year absorption guide of 2.8, that's in line with your average in the first quarter. Maybe even a bit above year to date if you include April's softness in there. So is that's counterseasonal. I mean, normally, we would see absorptions a bit lower certainly in the fourth quarter. So is that stability just based on your expectation or your, you know, I guess, strategy, if you will, to what you need to do from an incentive standpoint to kind of hit that type of absorption level?

Yeah. I think that's fair, Alan. Yes.

Okay. Perfect. Alright. And then finally, just on the tariffs. I know you mentioned kind of no significant cost impact. I'm just curious, is there any potential or are you at all kind of concerned about the potential for some supply chain disruptions from all of this noise just kind of thinking, like, if builders were to try to move around some of their suppliers to try to mitigate some of these potential cost headwinds? Could that cause any stress on some domestic suppliers or the distributors or any bottlenecks that have you had any conversations with trades alluding to that at all?

Yeah. I mean, we've obviously been cognizant that could be a result going forward. We haven't seen anything to date, of course, but you know, we're fully aware that that could happen and working toward if it did. You know, how we would mitigate that. But, again, nothing today. It's still very fluid as things are moving around. But it is a possibility.

Of course. Understood. Thanks a lot. Appreciate it.

Thank you. Absolutely.

Your next question comes from Michael Rehaut of JPMorgan. Your line is already open.

Everyone. This is Andrew Azzi on for Mike. Appreciate you taking my questions. Just for the drill down hey. Not sure if you covered this I joined a bit late, but if possible, I wanted to drill down a bit into the demand trends over the last couple of months. Within the quarter. Obviously, we know April was pretty volatile, but

Yeah, you know, what we really saw in the first quarter was, you know, with very typical seasonality, albeit muted from the very, very strong 2024 that we experienced in the first quarter. So sequentially, demand, absorptions, traffic, etcetera, were up as we move through the quarter. With March being a fairly typical March and kind of a three and a half from an absorption standpoint. And really the most recent change has been that we want to make sure is articulated here, in the materials is certainly the volatility in April has caused our consumer to pause. But again, from a first quarter's orders perspective, very typical seasonality, albeit a little bit more muted than 2024. A little bit more on pace with 2023.

Got it. And then maybe a bigger picture question on kind of the long-term 10% growth. What do you envision that to look like from a community count let's say, like, a normalized sales pace when you give that number of 10%?

Yeah. It, you know, difficult to obviously foresee where absorptions are gonna be. As we got into, you know, mid last year with the two acquisitions that we did and the efforts that we provided on the land front, the focus was really getting on the additional store count from which to drive volume from. That really hasn't changed as we sit here today. So we anticipate year over year that we'll be up in the mid-single digits from a community count standpoint. So from a positions from growth, I think we're we continue to be in a very good position to drive incremental leveraging G&A over the long term out of our community counts. You know, we continue to review upcoming communities under today's market assumptions to ensure that they're underwriting with the environment that we're in. But, you know, we certainly feel optimistic about long-term demand with our consumer profile with the product that we're providing. And so I think we are we're very optimistic in achieving that growth over a longer period of time. Certainly, the market dynamics of the first quarter and then really recently here in April, have slowed down on the absorption side, but we'll continue to work towards getting additional community count open to leverage the infrastructure that we have.

I really appreciate all the color. That's helpful. I'll pass it on. Thank you so much.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Ken Zener of Seaport Research Partners. Your line is already open.

Afternoon, everybody. Good afternoon, Ken. Appreciate the transparency around the delta and incentives. That's very useful. Now did you see it occur you know, if that's your general shift in incentives, did it occur more in the Century Complete product line, or was it more just kind of regional in nature, or was it price point in nature? I'm trying to discern how the different buyers might be demanding incentives.

You know, Ken, a handful of dynamics that are running through the various different regions on incentives. I think from a mortgage incentive side, you see it very consistently across our buyer profile. Our Century Complete brand is, as you're aware, a little bit more direct in terms of the pricing. Not as, you know, not a ton of additional options that are available within the spec homes. And so you don't see as many just direct price reductions within that brand just as a normal course. Within the regions of Century Complete, I think or excuse me, the Century brand, we are seeing a little of a higher incentive level within likely our Texas region as opposed to our other regions. I don't know that I would necessarily slice it between any other price point. In general, the West is probably held up the strongest amongst all of our regions. But as you know, we're pretty focused on the first-time homebuyer. So generally speaking, the turns on incentives have been consistent across our regions.

Right. Appreciate that. And then from when you guys gave guidance at the end of January, obviously, a few things have happened, to put them badly. But what I'm interested in is your kind of process of thinking about it. So if you start, I think you said 2,211, it starts this quarter, and you did about 700 orders. And did they lose you? Build Operator, are you still there?

Yes. I think we lost the signals of Ken. I'll proceed to the next

Yeah. But we couldn't we heard just the first part of it, and then apologies. We could not hear the last of the question.

That's alright. I had stopped talking, which is surprising. What I'm asking is you obviously decelerated starts. So if I match your starts to your orders, that gives us a fair indication about your closing range. But do you have to do any destocking? A homebuilder today mentioned that they're actually just gonna be like, lowering their inventory except they wanna reduce their spec counts. Is that a situation where you are, or do you see kind of orders and starts in theory walking hand in hand through the rest of the year?

Yeah. Ken, if you were to go back a couple quarters in the early last year, we were as the market was more robust, you know, we certainly had a higher starts level. We really sent, you know, the back half of last year, third quarter, and really into the fourth quarter, we've moderated those starts such that especially we feel like we're in an appropriate position from an inventory level for which to move forward on.

Okay. Good. And, like, I know I've asked this before, but, like, many of the builders report inventory against which we give us useful insight into that start number and inventory and stuff? But thank you very much, and I do appreciate your clarity.

Thank you.

Your next question comes from Alex Barron of Housing Research Center. Your line is already open.

Thank you. Good afternoon, gentlemen.

Hi, Alex.

I wanted to hi there. I wanted to understand how you guys are thinking about using cash flow that comes back as you close homes to buy incremental land versus stepping up on the share buyback given the discount to book value.

Yeah. Alex, great question. I think, you know, from a high level, from a capital allocation perspective, really no changes than kind of what we've previously discussed. Broadly over the last eighteen months or so. I think our first priority is to reinvest in the business while keeping our leverage. Generally, where you can see it run, which, you know, call it thirty to thirty-five percent at various different points by the end of the year likely down into that thirty percent debt to cap range. Last year, we did over a hundred million dollars of returning capital to our shareholders, both through our dividends as well as share repurchases. And certainly given the fifty-five million dollars of share repurchases that we did here during the first quarter, we're certainly well on our pace to hit or exceed that number next year. As we certainly look at, you know, continue to look at our land pipeline and underwrite to their current market conditions. We certainly will be opportunistic when we think it makes sense to redeploy some of that capital to share buybacks.

Got it. And as far as the decision, you know, whether to increase rate buy down versus cut prices maybe in response to what your competitors are doing. How are you guys making that decision? You know? What drives it?

I mean, it's really a balancing act, and it goes down to the individual subdivision and house, Alex. And, you know, a lot of it depends on that particular market, what some of the competitors are doing, and candidly, we're all doing a lot of the same thing in that regard. But it really just depends on the particular market and the subdivision within that market. It's not just general across the board that one size fits all.

Okay. Well, best of luck for this year.

Absolutely. Thank you.

Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you have a question, there are no further questions at this time. I would hand over the call to Dale Francescon for closing remarks. Please go ahead.

Thank you, operator. To everyone on the call, thank you for your time today and interest in Century Communities. For our team members, thank you for your hard work, dedication to Century, and commitment to our valued home buyers.

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, and you may now disconnect.