Good day and welcome to the Coca-Cola European Partners First Quarter 2018 Conference Call. At the request of Coca-Cola European Partners, this conference is being recorded for instant replay purposes. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Mr. Thor Erickson, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir.

Thank you, and thanks to everyone for being on our call. We appreciate your interest and for joining us to discuss our first quarter 2018 results, as well as our outlook for full-year 2018. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you of our cautionary statements. This call will contain forward-looking management comments and other statements reflecting our outlook for future periods. These comments should be considered in conjunction with the cautionary language contained in this morning's release, as well as the detailed cautionary statements found in reports filed with the UK, U.S., Dutch, and Spanish authorities. A copy of this information is available on our website at www.ccep.com. Today's prepared remarks will be made by Damian Gammell, our CEO; and Nik Jhangiani, our CFO. Following prepared remarks, we will open the call for your questions. In order to give as many people as possible the opportunity to ask questions, please limit yourself to one question and we will take follow-up questions as time permits. Now, I'll turn the call over to Damian Gammell.

Thank you, Thor, and many thanks to everyone joining us today to discuss the results for the first quarter of 2018 and our outlook for the rest of the year. While we face some challenges during the quarter, our Q1 results demonstrate our continued focus on driving profitable revenue growth and creating joint value for our customers. We continue to build our beverage portfolio and improve our execution market-by-market. Revenue increased 1% on a comparable and currency-neutral basis, led by a 3.5% increase in revenue per unit case, as we continue to benefit from our dedicated efforts to improve price and mix. This was offset by a 2.5% decline in volume, primarily driven by unfavorable weather and the impact of our portfolio decisions, primarily in the water segment where we have made conscious decisions to focus on brands and packs that can generate sustainable value for CCEP and our customers. And we also continue to optimize our promo investments market-by-market. Our continued focus on profitable revenue growth led to some volume pressure with some of our customers during the quarter, notably in France. While we see this disruption as a near-term challenge, our focus on price realization and the reduction of deep promotions is the right thing to do for our business and for the overall category in the longer term. We also continue to see transactions outpace volume during the first quarter as this remains a key focus and a key success point for our strategy. This modest revenue growth and continued realization of post-merger synergy benefits helped to drive an operating profit growth of 13% on a comparable and currency-neutral basis. That being said, as you know, the first quarter is our smallest and we still have the important summer selling period ahead of us. While we will…

Thank you, Damian, and thank you, all, for taking the time to be with us today. Let me start by providing a bit more detail on our first quarter results and then I'll talk about our outlook for the rest of 2018. So, on a reported basis, first quarter diluted earnings per share were €0.25 or €0.33 on a comparable basis, including a negligible impact from currency translation. Revenue increased 1% on a comparable and currency-neutral basis, this was driven by 3.5% increase in revenue per unit case, reflecting favorable price, promotion and channel mix with growth across all our business units. I would also like to point out that this is the fifth consecutive quarter in which our away-from-home channel outperformed the home channel, which clearly supports our focus on favorable mix. First quarter revenue per unit case also included a benefit of approximately €0.01 or 0.5% from the impact of incremental sugar and excise taxes, primarily in Norway and Belgium. We will provide more color on the impact to revenue and COGS per unit case in future quarters as the impact becomes more significant. Volume declined by 2.5% in the quarter due to three main factors: Unfavorable weather conditions; customer disruptions as we continue to focus on price and mix realization; and the impact of our strategic brand management decisions, mainly on low-margin water brands in Germany and Spain. This was partially offset by the benefits of an earlier Easter, albeit a much colder one. First quarter cost of sales per unit case increased by 1% on a comparable and currency-neutral basis. This was driven by modest input cost inflation namely aluminum and an increase in our concentrate costs as a result of our strong revenue per unit case realization linked to our incidence model with The Coca-Cola…

Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Lauren Lieberman of Barclays. Your line is now open.

Great. Thanks. Good morning.

Good morning.

I wanted to ask a little about the retail and your sort of customer disputes. All very understandable and broadly expected. But I just wanted to I guess, one, understand if you say that France is probably the market with the most room for improving that promotional effectiveness. And two, I think it's – I'm guessing this is a retailer-by-retailer dynamics, because if I recall last quarter we talked about better promotional effectiveness, but volume was actually a bit better than what you saw this quarter. So, if you could just talk about the sort of nuances of customer-by-customer negotiations, if it's a seasonal dynamic, if the comp was something notable in this quarter with this particular retailer and then again just France versus the other countries in terms of like rank order of how much room there is to improve the efficiency of the promotional dollars? Thank you.

Thanks, Lauren. I think it's important that it really is a fringe issue. And within that it's really within a very narrow band within France as well. So, I think it's important to call out that across the rest of our business and if you look at our revenue growth by business unit, we are enjoying a very collaborative and growth focused agenda with all our other customers. So, I don't want to make it sound any bigger than it really is. Obviously, having said that, France is an important BU and all of our customers are important to us in France. But this is a very French-specific challenge and we're working through it. And again, it only represents within France, well, not a large part of our business, but still obviously we would prefer to resolve them and we're working towards that. In fact, if you look at, for example, in GB, Germany, Belux (21:37), our customer engagement and the execution of our plans is right on track for where we thought we'd be at this stage. Particularly in GB, I have to say that the collaboration between ourselves and our customers in preparation for the sugar tax has gone extremely well. You can imagine there was a lot of supply chain changes that needed to be made, merchandising changes. Nik and I have been in the market recently in GB and we're very pleased that both our customers and our team seemed to manage that extremely well. So, it is something we're working through. It is related to what Nik mentioned, our objective to create long-term value for our customers and our shareholders. And by and large, as a percentage of our total revenue in CCEP, you're looking at a very, very marginal amount of impact in the first quarter. But obviously, when you look at the French BU stand-alone, you can see the volume impact. But that's where we're at, at the moment, Lauren. And then, obviously we're working through it. But I think we demonstrated last year and if you look at our full-year results for 2017 that also came on the back of making some great decisions around promo prices. That has worked in terms of the margin and cash generation for ourselves and our customers. So, we believe, we're definitely on the right path, albeit with some small bumps.

And this has also just definitely helped our revenue per case realization in France, by ensuring that we're resetting the base with this customer, in particular. So, that helps us. And obviously, the weather, Lauren, had an impact, too.

Yeah.

It's all kind of together.

Right.

Yeah. Okay. Great. Thank you so much.

Thank you. And our next question comes from the line of Caroline Levy of Macquarie. Your line is now open. Caroline Levy - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.: Thank you so much. If you're in London, good afternoon. Just wanted to ask.

Good afternoon. We are. Caroline Levy - Macquarie Capital (USA), Inc.: Thanks. Hi, Nik. On April, you've already, you've just seen the taxes go into place in the UK. And what did the retailers do and you do on the shelf sets to prepare? I mean, could we see the percentage of mix that's in sugar drinks go down further in your opinion? And specifically on energy, you've got big exposure on the sugar side in energy. If you could just talk to us about what the shelf resets look like? And then, you've had an actual experience with the tax increases in Northern Europe. What have you seen specifically on mix there, if you're really seeing people trade into diets as opposed to just trade away from the category?

Hi, Caroline. So, let me share some color around that topic. So, if you – as Nik mentioned and as we commented on the call, I think if you look at our Q1 results, certainly winter lasted too long in Europe for our liking. And we have seen a slight rebound coming back in April, which is good news for us as well. We also – unfortunately, Easter moved into Q1, and obviously an early Easter is great when the weather is good; but when the weather is bad, obviously it can have a bigger impact. But even with that, we managed to deliver our revenue growth. As you look specifically at GB, what you'll see in store is obviously the taxes being passed on by the retailers as we expected. You're seeing new pack formats in place. So for us, you'll recall that we talked about moving Coke Classic to 1.5 liter from 1.75 liter and to 1 liter from 1.25 liter and that's all now in play. We also moved to a 0.375 milliliter offering and kept our 0.5 liter offering to obviously manage the absolute pocket price for the consumer. That's all in place. Merchandising is complete. There hasn't been a dramatic change in the space in store, so we still are quite pleased with the amount of space that we see for Coke Classic, for Coke Zero, and for Diet Coke. It's now really what we're seeing from the consumers in terms of off-take. And at the moment, early to say, but it's going as well as we could have expected. I suppose that's how we would sum it up at the moment. In terms of learning from other markets, I suppose the market that we've looked to is Portugal. If you recall, we had a…

Thank you. Our next question comes from line of Judy Hong of Goldman Sachs. Your line is now open. Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Thank you. Hi, everyone.

Hey, Judy.

Hi, Judy. Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: So, I guess, first just in terms of your revenue guidance. So, obviously, Q1 was a little bit tough, given the weather issues. But it seems like volume could actually – could be under pressure in markets like GB with the sugar tax and pricing is already pretty strong in Q1. And you do have a tough comp in the second quarter. So, I'm just curious how you think about the confidence level in achieving that top-line guidance for the rest of the year, is my first question.

Thanks, Judy. Obviously, we reaffirmed our guidance today, so we are confident in achieving the top-line revenue. I suppose when we look internally at what happened in Q1, there were a number of factors that came into play. And it is our smallest quarter. So, when we look at our revenue realization per case in Q1, obviously, that supports our guidance for the rest of the year. When we look at some of the volume headwinds, obviously, you can never predict how great a summer will be in Europe, but obviously we do have a longer winter than planned and we don't expect that to continue and April has been better. And then when we look at the second half of the year, I think you're right. Certainly, the second quarter is a tough comp and we baked that into our guidance, but we certainly see good potential as we move into the summer and into Q4 in 2018. So, overall, we're confident. We have very robust brand and pack innovations in place with The Coke Company. All of our pricing is in place with our customers. And I have to say there is a – it's a good place to be ironically now that the sugar tax is in place, so we can start talking about it as a real event. So, that's behind us now and we've got to look forward. And I'm also pleased that our execution and distribution across all of our BUs continues to improve. So, all of those dynamics certainly support our guidance and we remain confident about our top line growth. I have to say, we are particularly pleased with our net price realization per case. I think that is a – it's a good number and it is a very solid foundation for long-term revenue growth. So, we'll continue to focus on that. You also got to bear in mind that some of the volume declines you noted in Q1 were deliberate. And we made some bold choices around water brands that were not creating value for us or our customers. And as you are also aware, we're very pleased with our transition to FUZE Tea. But again, obviously most of that impact also came in Q1. So, they were conscious decisions for the long-term. We're happy with them, but obviously impacted that 2% volume decline. So, overall we remain confident and still a lot of work to do. As I remind my colleagues, but we remain very confident in the rest of the year.

And just building on that last point of Damian's, as we had built our guidance, we had factored in some of those strategic brand choices that we were making. So, I think the biggest piece really from a Q1 perspective was the weather impact, which obviously we can't control. But fortunately, been our smallest quarter and we hope that it will lead to a nice warm summer. Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Yeah. Hope so, too. Okay. So, Nik, just on the cost per case number in Q1 actually came in a little bit better than we had anticipating in. Obviously, you had the benefit of pricing coming in much better than the cost per case growth. So, just a little bit of color in terms of what happened in Q1 and any color just in terms for the rest of the year, how that would play out?

Yeah. I mean, we still remain on target we believe with that circa 2% to 3% COGS per unit case. I think you're going to see just some lumpiness during the course of the year depending on the comps. And if you take a look at last year, our COGS per unit case was up 4.5% in the first quarter and then tapered down. So, the comps play a role here, too. But I think the pressure that we've seen on aluminum, clearly the pricing that we realized in the market has a real-time impact based on our incidence model with Coke, which is the right thing for us, because we both want to grow revenues. And we'll continue to see how PET cost play out, because remember that's one of the elements that is largely unhedged. Everything else were pretty well covered. So, you will see some variability during the course of the year, but we feel comfortable with our guidance at this point for the full-year. Judy Hong - Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC: Got it. Okay. Thank you.

Thanks, Judy.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin Grundy of Jefferies. Your line is now open.

Thanks. Hi, guys.

Hey, Kevin.

A question on the cost synergies, the €315 million to €340 million guidance, which has been reaffirmed and realization has been on schedule, so that's been great. The other side to that, I guess, would be that that number was likely viewed as conservative at least among the Street and that there would be potential upside to that number. So Nik, a couple of questions with that. Can you sort of get us up to speed on your synergy outlook, ability to realize potential upside? And then the second part of that, maybe how big of a focus is that, how much time are you spending with respect to that, in terms of exceeding that target internally? Thank you.

So I will be very clear, again, we will deliver the €315 million to €340 million and we do not plan to deliver any upside over and above that. Clearly, we are focused on it. We have a whole team that's focused with the BUs in ensuring that we achieve the various buckets of synergies to be captured, be it on procurement, be it on operational efficiencies, cost saves, et cetera, and we will be very much in line to deliver against the €315 million to €340 million. And we will continue to look at any further upside to continue to invest in the business in the long-term as opposed to dropping to the bottom-line. Having said that, I think you also got to keep in mind, the Synergy Programme will end and we will continue to be focused on productivity initiatives. And that is something that will continue to help us as we look at our long-term growth algorithm and think about what we need to deliver from a leverage perspective going forward as well.

And just to build on that, Kevin, I think if you look at the overall organization and you mentioned how much time it's focused on, I think we've come through a number of significant events. Obviously, the integration and set-up of the company went seamlessly. We're very confident on delivering the synergies as Nik outlined. We will look for further productivity opportunities like any large organization going forward. But I do think if you look at our P&L and if you look back over the last number of quarters, I think the management team have really remained very diligent around our cost base synergy capture, which really allows the rest of the organization focus on top-line quality revenue growth. And so I'm quite happy that most of the energy in the organization is going where it should be, which is externally on our brand portfolio, customer service and building a better route to market. We have also got through the announcement of our Phase 2 Synergy Programme and that has largely gone extremely well and we're now in consultation about the changes. So that re-affirms Nik and I's confidence in being able to deliver the number. And, obviously, we look forward to moving out of the Synergy Programme as we outlined on the deal and into a much more regular conversation around productivity and leverage on the P&L. So overall, I think the time allocation is more than appropriate for where we are at the moment.

Okay. That's very clear. Thank you both. Good luck.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Robert Ottenstein of Evercore ISI. Your line is now open.

Great. Thank you. Two questions. First, did you see any inventory build by retailers ahead of the sugar tax, and did that have any impact on your numbers in your view? So that's question number one. And second question, can you give us just kind of a general overview about the competitive dynamics in your key markets? Is it looking largely rational and are people following your disciplined price mix approach or do you see people taking advantage of it in ways that could be detrimental to the markets? Thank you.

Hi, Robert. Thank you. On your first question, we really didn't see any significant inventory build pre the sugar levy. So that was good news. And that certainly, if there was any, it was obviously very, very small, so that hasn't been an impact. We're clearly now into the new packaging on shelf, as I mentioned earlier. On your second question, the good news is our markets all remain very competitive and we think that's good for the category. It's good for us, because it forces us to continue to raise our game and the quality of our innovation and execution. I think on pricing, broadly speaking, I think most markets have seen the whole category move up in pricing, certainly in base pricing. I think you'll continue to see and we will continue to see market by market competitors taking a different view around promotional pricing. I mean, that's clearly something that they make decisions based on their own financial objectives and we make our decision based on ours, which is really around value creation and price mix realization. So as we have moved out of some of those deep promotions, particularly in large PET, we have seen in some markets some competitors stepping in to fill that role for the retailer. We anticipated that. Overall, our share is pretty much flat in any RTD. We have seen some pressure on some of our shares in sparkling, again mainly due to promotional pricing levels and that's something we will take a long-term view on and certainly we believe the value we're creating for our retailers and our shareholders is sizable and to kind of reverse that by making some short-term promo decisions wouldn't be the right decision. So it remains competitive. Rational is always a fairly interesting word. It depends on your definition of rational. I would say, there's certainly nothing surprising about it, would be the language, I'd probably use. And it remains good and competitive, which I think is good for our customers, our consumers, and I think it's also good for us.

Terrific. Very helpful. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ali Dibadj of Bernstein. Your line is now open. Ali Dibadj - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC: Hey, guys. We're just hoping, on the gross margin side, you could kind of disaggregate the drivers a little bit further and really try to get a sense of sustainability. So for example, obviously, the commodity costs at 1% increase from organic cost of sales. If sugar price is down, probably using less sugar as well, some of that feels sustainable, some of that doesn't. So if you could, first off, just disaggregate that, that would be helpful. And then, my second question is back on top-line. If you could get us a sense there too in terms of price versus volume going forward for the year and then if you can just tell us about the 2% to 3%, in particular from the sugar tax and what you expect there from a price versus a volume perspective? I would appreciate it. Thank you.

So on the COGS, clearly, as I said, you're going to see some lumpiness just based on the comps. So, Q1 last year was up 4.5%, and we're cycling that. And then, if you look at Q2 through Q4, it was more in that 2.5% to 3% type of range. So, there's clearly that delta that has an impact. If you look at the elements of it, as you rightly said, the commodities will be up net-net. We don't break that by – in detail, but net-net will be up in that 1% to 2% range. And part of that obviously continues to be the fact that our PET element still remains open as it is traditionally at this time of the year. And then concentrate will go up in line with our revenue per case realization, so you'll see that. And clearly that was strong in Q1, but it was offset by some of the manufacturing efficiencies and synergy programs, et cetera, that you'll continue to see going through the course of the year. So, that's pretty much the majority of the color that I can give you. The last piece that I will also highlight is, we continue to see the away-from-home and smaller packs grow faster. That clearly has a positive impact on our revenue, but also has a higher COGS impact. So, you will see that come through more particularly in the second and the third quarter, when you see that away-from-home business actually stronger. Just from a summer selling season perspective.

Just on the – your question, Ali, on the price volume. I think we're obviously pleased that we've been able to realize the price per case that you've seen in our results for Q1 and obviously that sets the foundation for the rest of the year. So, we're pleased we could achieve that across all of our markets with most of our retailers. Moving into the summer, clearly we'd expect three elements to underpin our revenue growth. That price mix, as Nik referenced, the continued focus on smaller packaging and transaction growth. And obviously, we would see volume playing a role as we move into the summer as well. We don't specifically break that out and we don't break it up by BU. I suppose the one that we'll be watching the most will really be, will the volume impact in GB, what will it be relative to our initial expectations coming from the sugar levy. And again, I think that's probably the variable that we'll be able to give you a lot more clarity on as we probably move into May/June, once we get a number of trading weeks behind us. I do also think it's important to note that as we brought the new packaging and the sugar levy into GB, clearly the promotional ways has also reduced, because obviously it's very difficult to set new pricing and new packaging while you promote. So, I think we will also get a better read on how robust the volume is as we start to look at price promos coming back into the GB business as we transition to the sugar levy. So, overall those three elements are built into our guidance. And we remain focused on being able to deliver that growth as we've outlined for 2018. But on the big variables, we'll be happy to share more color on that as we move into May and June. Ali Dibadj - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC: So just on that 2% to 3% from the sugar tax expectations on revenue, can you describe what your expectations would be or have been coming in, so we can compare it to what's actually happening in the marketplace between the pricing and the volume effectively the elasticity that you're assuming?

Nik?

Just referring to the pure accounting impact of the gross up of the sugar tax, right? Ali Dibadj - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC: Correct. Yes. Sorry. It was just that, that you're not assuming price elasticity at all in that 2% to 3%.

Correct. That is just the pure gross up. The price elasticity is built in to what is our revenue and our operating income guidance that we've provided to you which is on that organic excluding the sugar tax gross up. So, the 2% to 3% is purely just the accounting implication. Ali Dibadj - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC: Okay. Okay. Great. Thanks.

And the volume impact that we expect goes back to what we disclosed last October. So, we haven't changed our position yet. We'll wait and see how the market responds, but as we mentioned that's so far so good. Ali Dibadj - Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. LLC: Okay. Thanks.

Thanks.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Bryan Spillane of Bank of America. Your line is now open.

Hey. Good morning, everyone.

Hey, Bryan.

Hi, Bryan.

Just a couple of questions. First on the – on FUZE, switching tea to FUZE and the volume hit you took in the quarter on some of the decision you made in water. Does any of that carry forward into the next couple of quarters or is that all just a sort of one-quarter-type event?

Hi, Bryan. No, that will continue. So, if you look at the brands that we've existed, obviously that impacts Q1, but obviously that will roll through more or less into...

Q2 and Q3.

...Q3 had the big ones and then most of the changes we made in Q4. So, we'll cycle out of it in Q4. Again, it will impact volume slightly, but from obviously a price mix and margin perspective, we're very happy with that decision. FUZE also, as we repositioned our role into tea category, we went very much more for a value and margin profit play. So, what you'll see our FUZE packaging, just to give you some proof points versus our previous tea proposition, we're now in a 400 ml versus a 500 ml previously. We're now in a 1.25 liter versus a 1.5 liter previously. Our channel focus is much more in the channels where we believe we can generate profit and revenue for our customers and ourselves. So, the pack changes in itself will obviously flow through to a volume impact, but again, for all the right reasons. And we're continuing to look at building distribution on that brand, so that will continue certainly into 2019. But, again, I think a good conscious decision for long-term value creation. And FUZE is actually doing better than we expected in the markets, and we're very pleased with that. So, more to come on FUZE, I believe.

And then, just the last piece is, you've been very successful with pricing and mix really since the merger and I know there's a lot of pieces to it. The work you've done standardizing a lot of like sales force technology and I suppose also Coke – The Coca-Cola Company has sort of stepped up its marketing efforts. But I guess – so I guess if you can just give us – kind of describe now that you're this far into it, just what are the factors that have really made your – given you that ability to sort of price mix more consistently than maybe had been the case in the past? And I guess, the idea is just how is that sustainable going forward?

So, I suppose the first kind of strategic element that fits into that space is the alignment with the company on instant pricing. So, we've been working with that now for a few years. But like all changes, the longer you work with it, the more comfortable your teams become with it. So, I do think The Coke Company's focus on revenue as being their key value driver versus volume is a clear foundational benefit in this whole area. So, I'd say that's definitely a big part of the success. Beyond that, I think as we looked at creating value for our customers and our shareholders pre-merger, we did identify areas that we felt were not really sustainable for our consumers or our customers, mainly in the area of large discounted PET promotions. You'll recall Bryan last year, we spoke a lot about that during the year as we rolled back that investment and redeployed those funds into more profitable packs. That's certainly continuing to have a benefit. We have been able to negotiate some headline price increases which most of our retailers have passed on, so their margin has been retained, but their absolute profitability is increased. We spend a lot of time working with our retailers on our key account teams, understanding the profitability of our category for our customers and where we see opportunities for them to generate more cash. And clearly, cash has been a focus for us at CCEP as well. And then, I suppose finally, we've invested a lot in coolers. We've invested a lot in our supply chain to be able to deliver more smaller premium packages to the marketplace. I would put one caveat that that last point takes a long time. So, moving mix in our industry is probably of the three dynamics of price, volume and mix, certainly mix is the one that will take a bit of time. But once you get it, it tends to be also very sustainable. So, to answer your point of sustainability, we believe it is sustainable and we do believe as we roll out mini cans and glass and smaller PET, which you'll see across Europe, that certainly builds in that sustainability. So, multitude of factors and slightly different market-by-market, what I would say, they're the key themes that are common.

Okay. Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Mark Swartzberg of Stifel. Your line is now open. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Thanks. Hey. Good afternoon, everyone. I had a question on France or a couple in France, but just from a second quarter perspective. Are you all budgeting for revenue to be down in the second quarter given the compare?

We don't provide guidance by quarter and that's really quite built into our full-year number. So, I would hate to start a trend here. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Hate to – fair enough.

Mark, I would let them start a trend.

Yeah. He's tickling me under the table. Don't say anything.

My finger was going to the mute button very quickly. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Fair enough. Fair enough. I totally hear you guys. And then France, is it right to think there's another leg up in pricing with the soft drink tax coming July 1? And if it is correct or I guess regardless of whether it's correct, how would you characterize the clarity you've got from retailers in terms of their receptivity, their readiness to pass this through?

I think we've got very, very good clarity. We spend a lot of time engaging with our retailers. And I think going back to a point that Caroline raised earlier, I think we need to keep what's happening in France in context. It's really one retailer and we're working through it. So, the rest of the market, we've looked at what we believe is going to help us navigate through in GB and we've applied similar logic to our French business, which is as the tax comes in, you'll see new packaging coming into the market that we believe will give us a better chance to protect our consumer franchise through the price point, generate more margin for our customers, and also make sure that we retain some level of affordability in the category. So, we will be going through a similar exercise in France in Q2 with pack changes and remerchandising shelves and I'm bringing new packaging to the market, which I think is going to be exciting. France hasn't had a lot of real pack innovation over a number of years and I think the category has suffered in France because of that. It's been very dominated by one pack which is 1.5 liter. Ironically, I think this change gives us the chance to potentially stimulate the category for the longer term by bringing more pack innovation. So, we're excited about it. We're realistic that it will be disruptive. That's in our guidance. We know that. But I do think potentially for France, in particular, it may give us an opportunity to reassess the category with a stronger focus on value and profit for our customers. That's certainly our intent. We believe the category's success is always in direct proportion to the profitability for the customer. And if we can generate profitability, I think they support the category more and more and I think that's what we're seeing in other markets. So, yeah, Q2 will be interesting in France, but I'm personally excited about it, because I think we will be able to, as I mentioned, bring some pack innovation that really has not been in France for a long, long time. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And that's coming – the pack innovation is coming in France in the second quarter?

Yeah. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Where are you in communicating your price increase plans vis-à-vis the soft drink tax in France?

That was all done as part of our annual conversations that took place end of last year and into early Q1. So, that's all in place. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: And you've got – you got a better read on there with France?

And you'll see the tax range is coming...

Yes.

And just to be clear, you'll see the pack changes coming through towards the end of the second quarter as we launched the sugar tax July 1. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Yeah. That's great. That's great. And sorry, if it goes along here, but is there a country that's out performing? It seems like France is a little more challenging, but do you think GB is doing better than planned or Iberia. I'm just curious. It seems like something is offsetting this to support your confidence for the full-year?

Something is offsetting, France is that... Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Yeah. It seems like France is a challenge, you didn't quite expect to the degree you're getting, but other – some other market or set of markets are giving you confidence behind your full-year guidance staying the same?

I think that's one of the benefits and why we created CCEP. I mean we're now operating with a much bigger geography. I think Germany has had a great 2017 and that continues to perform well and it's a big market for us. I think the GB results in Q1 are very solid. But honestly, if I look across all our markets, and I look at Q2 which will be a big comp we understand that. So you got to look kind of full year. We believe all our markets have strong potential for the rest of the year, including France. I mean, I think Q1 and as we look at our business in France beyond the disruption, it's performing well with other retailers and then away-from-home. So overall, that gives us confidence albeit coming out of our smallest quarter. So yeah. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Very helpful.

It's the way I would probably shape it. Mark David Swartzberg - Stifel, Nicolaus & Co., Inc.: Very helpful. Thank you, guys.

Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris Pitcher of Redburn. Your line is now open. Christopher Michael Pitcher - Redburn (Europe) Ltd.: Thanks very much. Good afternoon. A couple of questions, please. Firstly on Germany, where it looks like you're getting very strong price mix coming through and probably accelerating from what we saw last year. Could you give us a feel for how your distribution is changing there, and importantly how your pack mix has changed away from – what level is the returnable PET right now? And then, secondly, on Fuze Tea. Every market is very encouraged by the rollout of Fuze Tea, but some markets have gone better than others. What have you learnt from the system about how to position Fuze Tea against Lipton and Nestea, particularly in big markets like Germany? And can you give us some reassurance or some idea of how long you're going to keep Nestea in Spain and are you rolling out Fuze Tea there in sort of anticipation? Thanks.

So maybe I'll just go in reverse order. We plan to have Nestea in Spain for a number of years more. We did a separate agreement on Spain. So we don't expect Fuze to play a role there for a number of years. And obviously, we'll communicate at an appropriate time if that changes. On our overall tea strategy, clearly we've sat down with The Coke Company and we've looked at global markets and where we could learn. I think our primary learning was to really focus on value and the product benefits versus volume and price. So one of our concerns was there is a lot of brands in the tea category that play on price and volume and that obviously is not an area that interests us, but it's also quite a crowded area. So we did take some deliberate decisions, as I mentioned earlier, like downsizing our packaging, which we believe is more appropriate for the tea occasion, but also is a better value play for ourselves and our customers. And we've spend a lot of time investing in advertising to help consumers understand what we believe is a superior product experience based more from a brewed tea heritage than probably what you're seeing in the market. So lots of learning. It's going well. We're still learning which is good news. And we will continue to reflect and adapt our strategy as we go. But overall, we're seeing a good acceptance of the brand and the packaging, in what is a competitive category. So we've seen a strong response from our competitors and we would expect that to continue. On Germany, it's fair to say, we have enjoyed good price mix realization. We have taken a decision over the last number of quarters to simplify our product portfolio in Germany. So from a refillable perspective, we have a very strong refillable glass business, which we are very pleased with. We have a refillable 1 liter PET business, which remains a big part of our proposition. We have sharpened up our pricing and promo investment on that pack to make it more profitable. That's worked. And we've pretty much de-listed all of the other refillable PET packaging. So 0.5 liter, 1.5 liter is now out of the business. So we are benefiting in Germany of a more simplified pack SKU range. We are benefiting from more sensible promotional investment on refillable PET. And the team in Germany have done a good job managing our away-from-home business and our mix. So all of those elements are contributing to a solid German performance. Christopher Michael Pitcher - Redburn (Europe) Ltd.: Can you give us a sense of what made the refillable part of the businesses, glass and PET now in terms of volume?

It's probably about a 30% to 40%.

Yeah. Yeah. Christopher Michael Pitcher - Redburn (Europe) Ltd.: Thanks very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Brett Cooper of Consumer Edge Research. Your line is now open.

Hey, guys. Couple of questions. The first one was just, where do you think you are on realizing promotional efficiency, obviously, knowing the category is highly promoted and likely will be in the future?

Well, it's different by BU. So I think a short answer to that is I think that in some ways is a never-ending journey. So I think it's something we will continuously to review on a quarterly and annual basis. We are seeing in some markets the promotional volume dropping to 20%, 30% of total revenue, which we would feel is probably more sustainable level. We're pleased with that. But it's something we'll continue to evaluate and obviously we don't operate alone. So an ultimate pricing decisions are made by our customers and also our competitor, obviously plays a role. So it's something we're pleased with in terms of the progress we've made. I would say, we don't believe that journey is over and it's quite a dynamic market anyway would be how I would see that, Brett.

Great. Thanks. And then can you just comment your outperformance in away-from-home versus take-home. I mean is that a market dynamic or is that a market share dynamic?

We would say clearly we're doing a better job internally focusing on the away-from-home business. So that's certainly something that we believe we've invested in, in terms of coolers. We shared with some of you some of the technology we've given to our sales reps to enable that. And so we will believe that's something we're probably taking the lead on in most of our markets. From a share perspective, obviously Nielsen or the usual agencies don't cover away-from-home. So it's quite difficult to get a robust share number, but certainly we believe we're leading the market. To what degree it's hard to put a percentage on to be honest.

And if you just broadly look at the NARTD overall category it's probably about roughly speaking 60/40 away-from-home/home while our business is probably you know 60/40 home/away-from-home, right. So clearly Damian's point, that's where we're focusing in. We're reallocating some of what we're doing in home to actually make sure we're investing in core to take advantage of that. So, it's the right strategy for us long-term, but it takes time, as Damian said.

Sorry, if I can squeeze in one last one. The decision on capital or cash deployment, when should we expect to hear something from you guys on that? And then, I'll stop. Thanks.

That's a good place to stop.

Yeah. As we said, we said we've got some challenges through the course of this year. We want to see how should the taxes play out both in GB and in France, and we remain focused on being shareowner-friendly. So, we will update you at the right time as we continue to see how the year continues to evolve.

Thanks.

Thank you.

So, one last question, operator.

Our next question comes from the line of Eric Wilmer of ABN AMRO Bank. Your line is now open.

Hi. Good afternoon. There has been some certain rumors in the market on CCEP also being involved in the deal, where CCH is buying African Coca-Cola assets from AB InBev. Are there any words that you would be willing to address to this? Thank you.

The words that we would continue to address would be that we are interested in geographic expansion. Western Europe continues to be where we would like to grow first. But you know a lot of M&A is opportunistic and we will continue to assess all opportunities in terms of potential franchises that might be available.

Yeah, I think Eric just to build on what Nik said, our priority as we created CCEP was to deliver on our commitments which I think we're doing to build a balance sheet that allows for M&A and I think if you look at our free cash flow on a net debt situation, we're definitely in a place to do that. And have the organizational capability to be able to take on more territory. So, we believe in those three metrics, we're in a good place. Clearly, to be a buyer you need a seller. And we will obviously wait and see if anything comes up. But obviously wouldn't be appropriate for us to comment on some of the rumors that you're hearing in the market.

So that means in theory that you could also look outside of Europe at this stage? Just to make sure that I understand correctly.

In theory, yes, but as I said our first priority remains to be able to expand into contiguous territories in Western Europe. But in theory, franchises come up and we would assess them.

All right. Very clear. Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you, Eric.

So, again I'd like to thank everybody who took the time to join our call today. Before we close, I'd just like to share some reflections. As we stated today, we are on track to deliver our full-year guidance. It has been a good start to the year, albeit our smallest quarter. We're very much focused now in executing our very solid plans around portfolio and customer value creation through the selling season ahead and we will do that as we continue to navigate through some of the headwinds we discussed on the call today. As ever, we remain focused on driving profitable revenue growth, generating cash, and delivering sustainable shareholder value. Both Nik, Thor, and I look forward to updating you on our journey through 2018 on our next call. Thank you very much.

Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This concludes today's program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.