Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by and welcome to The Chemours Company Third Quarter Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers’ presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Thank you. I would now like to hand the conference over to our speaker today, Jonathan Lock, Vice President of Corporate Development and Investor Relations. Thank you. Please go ahead, sir.

Good morning and welcome to The Chemours Company’s third quarter 2020 earnings conference call. I’m joined today by Mark Vergnano, President and Chief Executive Officer; Mark Newman, Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; and Sameer Ralhan, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we start, I'd like to remind you that comments made on this call, as well as the supplemental information provided in our presentation and on our website contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including the impact of COVID-19 on our business and operations and the other risks and uncertainties described in the documents Chemours has filed with the SEC. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are based on certain assumptions and expectations of future events that may not be realized. Actual results may differ and Chemours undertakes no duty to update any forward-looking statements as a result of future developments or new information. During the course of this call, management will refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures that we believe are useful to investors evaluating the company’s performance. A reconciliation of non-GAAP terms and adjustments are included in our release and at the end of this presentation. With that, I’ll turn the call over to our CEO, Mark Vergnano, who will review the highlights from the third quarter. Mark?

Thank you, Jonathan. And thank you everyone for joining us this morning. As I could imagine, many of you were up late last night monitoring the Presidential Election here in the United States. In spite of continued global macro economic weakness and uncertainty, we continue to deliver solid financial results on the back of strong execution in the third quarter. I am proud of this company’s continued resilience and determination through this unprecedented period of economic and social disruption. The tough measures we took earlier in the year to address the COVID-19 pandemic have paid dividends across the business. As we move into the early stages of a recovery, we feel well positioned in all of our end markets. Our true north remains the health of our people, and support of our customers and communities. It has served us well through the beginning of the pandemic, and will continue to be our guide as we forge ahead. Looking now to the results. The global economy continued to stabilize in the third quarter and in many sectors, we began to find some footing for recovery. It has certainly not been a synchronized bounce off the bottom, but demand has started to pick up in a way which suggests some momentum headed into 2021. This will obviously be impacted by the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and we continue to actively monitor regional and national actions taken in response to increasing cases in different parts of the world. I'm happy to report that we delivered $210 million of adjusted EBITDA in the quarter, up from $166 million in Q2, and slightly down from $248 million in the prior year. More importantly, we continue to see the benefits of our cash focused strategy and delivered $252 million of free cash flow in the…

Thanks Mark. I'll begin my comments on Chart 7. Second quarter revenue was $1.2 billion, down 11% from 2019. Adjusted EBITDA declined $38 million to $210 million. Margins declined slightly on a year-over-year basis to 17%. This decline in margins is primarily driven by lower margins in Titanium Technologies and Chemical Solutions, partially offset by higher margins in Fluroproducts. GAAP net income was $76 million, while adjusted net income was $78 million. This resulted in GAAP earnings of $0.46 per share, flat relative to last year, and adjusted earnings of $0.47 per share. Free cash flow was $252 million, an improvement of $92 million from the same quarter in 2019. Our strong cash flow reflects the impact of our cost control measures, working capital discipline, and CapEx management, which we announced earlier in the year. Given the current uncertainty in the global macroeconomic environment, we intend to continue on our strategy of running the business for cash through the fourth quarter. Finally, our board of directors approved a fourth quarter dividend of $0.25 per share. This is unchanged from the prior quarter and will be payable to shareholders of record as of November 16. Turning to Chart 8. Third quarter 2020 adjusted EBITDA was $210 million, down from $248 million in third quarter of 2019. Price was a headwind for all three segments in the quarter on a year-over-year basis. Also on year-over-year basis, volume was down in Fluroproducts and Chemical Solutions more than offsetting high volume in Titanium Technologies. Currency was a small benefit in the third quarter, primarily driven by a stronger euro versus the U.S. dollar, lower cost across the company, and stronger operating performance in Fluroproducts combined for a $66 million benefit in the quarter. Before we leave this chart, I do want to highlight that…

Thanks Sameer. I’ll commence my remarks on Chart 11. But let me start by recognizing the Chemours team that since the first days of this pandemic have been focused on executing our response plan. I'm very proud of the team and the solid results delivered in a challenging market environment. We are encouraged by the significant sequential improvement in all regions and most of the segments. We recognize that we continue living in volatile times with tremendous opportunity ahead. We remain focused and confident in our ability to create shareholder value over the long-term. Moving to the businesses, the results in the Fluroproducts segment reflect the uneven pace of the recovery from COVID-19. A stronger than expected recovery in order production rates in the quarter resulted in increased demand for our Opteon refrigerant in mobile applications. This was more than offset by weaker polymers demand due to our position further back in the supply chain and a delayed demand recovery in other polymer segments. Fluroproducts net sales in the third quarter were $533 million, down 16% from the third quarter of 2019. Pricing in the segment was a 5% headwind driven by mix and contractual price adjustments. Adjusted EBITDA came in at $112 million, with margins of 21% reflecting a 200 basis point margin improvement from the prior year. Adjusted EBITDA in the quarter reflects a 15% sequential improvement, but an 8% headwind in comparison with the same period last year. The lower net sales were partially offset by significant improvements in operating performance, the ramp up of Opteon production at our Corpus Christi site, and cost reduction efforts across the business. Given the current state of the global pandemic, our Fluroproducts demand outlook remains mixed. Opteon sales are dependent on a sustained recovery in automotive bill rates globally, which…

Thanks Mark. Turning to the last chart, I'd like to end the prepared portion of our remarks today, with a few thoughts on the shape of the recovery, and the outlook more broadly. This year has certainly been a challenge on a number of fronts from COVID-19 to social justice, to the unusually strong hurricane season. However, the people of Chemours have risen to each and every challenge with incredible determination. It has been inspiring to see this team undeterred by the events of 2020 and continuing to press forward on behalf of our customers. Chemours is adapting in real time and we have used the pandemic as an opportunity to further streamline our ways of working. We've been able to maintain and in many cases actually improve our productivity over the course of the last several months. I expect that many of these changes will become permanent, and will increase the clock speed of Chemours going forward. Looking ahead, my view is that we continue to be in the early stages of a recovery. We believe that the second quarter was the low point of the pandemic, across most end markets. Our order books have stabilized and in many cases are improving. As a company, we remain focused on the things we can control, including operational excellence, working capital and inventory management, and supplying our customers with what they need. These efforts are directed at maximizing cash generation, which gives us strategic flexibility and staying power through these uncertain times. While the balance sheet provides flexibility and staying power, we must never lose sight of what gives us our true strength. We have the best people, technology products of anyone in the industry. We continue to drive for low cost, and then new and exciting products and bring to life our vision of responsible chemistry. These attributes are foundational to the company, and give me confidence that our future is bright, and the best is yet to come. With that operator, please open the line for questions.

Yeah, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So, you know, maybe the first one, with regard to the price mix in Titanium Technologies, it was down about 5%, which seemed actually a little bit lower than what we would have expected. So, can you speak to the dynamics that are driving that right now? And also how we should be thinking about that going forward and if there's any kind of light at the end of the tunnel in terms of maybe seeing starting to see that turn up as well?

Yeah, good morning, John. You know, I guess the best way to look at that first is look at it sequentially, right. So, if you look at from second quarter to third quarter, you got to strip out, you know, everything in our prices, both minerals, as well as TiO₂ pigment. So, when you strip out minerals, which is primarily zircon, you know, you're more in the range of about a 1% delta, second quarter to the third quarter. And if you dig into that one more time, what you'll see is that's primarily all product mix. So, if you go account by account by account, we didn't really change price at all. It's all product mix from that standpoint. The 5% you're talking about is really year-on-year. That was all from the end of last year. If you remember, we really tried to drive market share, specifically in the plastics market where we lost a lot of share, and that really occurred at the end of 2019. So, you're not seeing any delta in price going on right now.

Got it. That's helpful. And just maybe as a follow up, like in the Titanium Technologies there, look you had some really impressive volumes in the quarter, and it looks like there's a lot of puts and takes going on right now. I mean, it certainly looks like inventories are low. You've got relatively strong demand, but you've got COVID resurging, I guess, can you give us your thoughts on how to think about, you know, whether we're going to see the usual seasonal dip in the fourth quarter and maybe early thoughts on 2021 when you're thinking about volume growth in this segment?

Yeah, I'd say the volume across TiO₂ for us has been really demand related. So, you still continue to have strong coatings demand. DIY continue to be strong in third quarter. Contractor coatings have been picking up. You know, we saw a significant laminate improvement. So, a lot of our laminate customers with furniture and flooring really picked up, that's more Europe and Asia, but that was a big pickup for us at the same time. So, we're seeing demand, pull through being very strong. When you look at it from a regional perspective John, double-digit growth across every region, whether it's North America, Asia, including China, Europe, and Latin America. So, we're seeing very strong pickup from volume. Across all the segments, across all the regions that we think is going to continue. And because of that, we do not feel at this point in time that we're going to see a seasonal drop in the fourth quarter.

Got it? Thanks very much for the color.

Sure.

Your next question comes from the line of Duffy Fischer from Barclays. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Yes, good morning, fellas. Couple questions are around Opteon. So, first one is, just relative to before COVID in the mobile market, how close are we back to the same levels of volume?

Yeah, so Opteon recovery was quite significant sequentially, you know, we probably see, you know, a doubling of volume sequentially as the automotive plants came back on Duffy, but when you look at global auto demand, year-over-year, we're still down about 5%. The results in the core that were aided by some of the good work we've done in the aftermarket space, you know, with particularly here in the U.S., but on auto OEM basis, you know, we continue to be surprised to the upside in terms of bills, but obviously something we watch very closely here as we go through Q4 with respect to, you know, COVID-19, and the impact, say in Europe, but so far have been very encouraged by strong auto, you know, especially in the U.S. and Western Europe, but we're still down in the quarter year-over-year.

Okay. And then, with the step down coming in Europe, the first step down we had was very beneficial for you guys, but we didn't have the illegal import issue at that time. With that overlaying it, do the illegal imports, do you think that most of the benefit of the step down, or do you think you guys will still see a big bump in the HFO from that step down next year?

Yeah, I would say, we're encouraged by the fact that the step down is coming. And the efforts continue to ramp up around illegal imports. As we've said, in prior calls, we think this is going to take, you know, some time to bear fruit. And obviously, you know, there's still a legal product in the market, in spite of the step down. So, you know, my sense is Duffy, this is going to take, you know, more than one or two quarters. And we certainly don't see any further deterioration, you know, in terms of year-over-year performance related to illegals. And so with the step down, and the work we're doing on illegals, you know, we would expect to see continued strengthening, but it's going to be a slower recovery there.

Okay. And then maybe sneak in one last one on, DuPont CEO on their call, said that they'd had recent conversations with you guys about, you know, a potential deal. So, from your side, can you just frame what you think the likelihood is, and kind of what the framework of a deal might look like?

Yeah, Duff. It’s Mark, we continue to have conversations. Ed and I continue to talk to you know, we talked this week. So from that standpoint, you know, we're trying to make progress there. As I've always said, you know the key for us is to make sure that we have, if we come up with an agreement that it's something that our shareholders will embrace, right? So it's got to be shareholder, friendly for us. And I know Ed feels the same way. It's got to be shareholder friendly for him. So to us, that's, that's the bellwether for us. This has got to be something that our shareholders would look at, and say, this is something that works for them. And so these are complicated, and they just take, they take time. And, you know, we keep working through issues. And I think we have less issues now than the first time we had talked to you guys about this. So, I'm optimistic we can get there, but it's always hard work from that standpoint, but yeah, we continue to talk, and our goal is to get this thing done only if it could be good for our shareholders.

Great. Thank you, guys.

Yeah.

Your next question comes from the line of Josh Spector with UBS. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Yeah. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Just wondering within fluoropolymers can you give us some granularity around how much the automotive exposed polymers were down maybe relative to the rest of the Polymer segment? And, you know, how you're thinking about that developing over the next quarter in terms of a lagged recovery based on where you are in the supply chain? Is that something you see getting better next quarter or is that still a longer term recovery there? Thanks.

Yes. I would say, auto represents probably close to 25% to 30% of our Polymer business, so it's a meaningful portion. And obviously, within the polymer space, we tend to be, you know, at a Tier 3 level in the supply chain, so further back. Within the quarter, while we were down sequentially on polymers, we did see, you know, continued strengthening in the quarter, in Q3. So, as we look to Q4, we would expect, you know, to see continued strengthening there.

Okay, thanks. And, you know, shifting gears in terms of your CRC goals, I thought the sustainability offering target was kind of interesting. You know, you're aiming to get to around 50% of sales, meeting [indiscernible] sustainability goals. From your earlier report, you’re around 10% or so I think. That's a pretty big gap. I mean, I'm assuming Opteon growth within the mix is a factor in closing that gap, but I'm wondering, you know, outside of that, what do you guys do to get there?

Yes. And so, Josh, you know, I sit on top of that team in terms of every month, and we go through our progress there. And we have interim goals to get to our 2030 goals. We are on track in all our interim goals. I feel very confident we're going to get to 50%. Yes, Opteon is going to be a big play on that. We have a lot of offerings on the – both on the TT side as well as in the fluoropolymer side they're going to be additive to this. So, this is something we keep in front of us all the time and our new product development, which we're going to really drive forward. You know, don't forget, you know, we are the leader in membranes in the hydrogen economy. Our Nafion membrane is sort of the bellwether, if you will, both on fuel cells as well as on hydrogen generation. So that's going to be a key part of our growth as well.

Your next question comes from the line of Bob Koort with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Thanks very much. I was hoping maybe you could help me dimensionalize the upside in Titanium Technologies. You know, you've got through the stabilization process and proved that you can keep prices at a pretty healthy level even when demand disappears. Just curious, how do you think about the up-cycle [when] demand comes back? Obviously, you guys get a disproportionate amount of the volume benefit, but is it an issue where you can get back into those, sort of mid-40s EBITDA levels or because there won't be as strong of a price component to an up-cycle, should we think about something more moderated?

Yes, I think Bob, you're going to have to think about our business being more like the mid-to-upper 20s in terms of EBITDA margins that's the more logical place for us to be. You know, as we put these ABA contracts in place for our customers, number one, it gives them stability. It also gives them the ability not to add inventory when they don't need to. So, we think the benefit of sort of cutting down this by the stock, destock kind of cycle is worth that sacrifice from that standpoint. So, these will be very healthy margins, but they'll be more like in the mid-20s to upper-20s as we're going forward. And as you see, you know, we are seeing the volume start to build, so building with our customers. Most of this volume increase is happening with our ABA contract customers, right. So, picking the right customers and working with them is really what's going to benefit us.

Got it. And Mark Newman, I think you said something about your situation in the fluoropolymers where your position is in the supply chain means a slower recovery. Can you explain maybe a little bit more specifically what you mean there?

Yeah, I just mean, you know, we are supplying to folks who make parts for the auto industry. So we're, you know, lower – we're not direct. So Opteon, we supply directly to auto OEMs. In the polymer space, as it relates to auto, we're supplying to folks who are making components for auto. And so, we're further back in the supply chain. And my only point there, Bob, is the recovery is – you know, is a phase delay because we're further back in the supply chain. So, you know, when you look at Q2 polymers, they weren't as impacted by the disruption with COVID-19 as say Opteon was. Opteon came roaring back in Q3 and polymers is seeing a lagged recovery. So, you know, I'd say as it relates to auto, you know, expect to see, you know, more of a lag there.

And should it be a whipping effect then when it kicks back in there? Should be that same sort of surge that you've seen in Opteon or no?

We would expect that the volumes go up from here, yes, from Q3, for sure. Yes.

Got you. Okay. Thanks, guys.

Yes.

Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Zekauskas from JP Morgan. Please go ahead, your line is now open.

Thanks very much. You know, if I think about Chemours in some historical terms, maybe your TiO₂ volumes peaked in 2017. And maybe they're 20% to 30% lower today. In the old days, people used to describe the titanium dioxide industry as growing at about a 3% rate. Do you think the industry has grown at a 3% rate since 2017 or if it hasn't, what rate do you think it's grown at? And how has the industry changed over time in your placement?

Well, for sure, you know, this is a GDP growth industry, Jeff. So from that standpoint, we're always going to be right around GDP as an industry. Some years, it's a little bit above; some years, it’s a little bit below. And again, one of the concepts we had with value stabilization was to stop the destocking, restocking phenomenon, and which would drive, you know, volumes way above GDP some years and way below GDP other years. So, I think the best way to look at this industry is GDP growth. That's how at least how we look at it from that standpoint. And our goal is going to be, you know, can we, at minimum, be at that kind of growth rate, and where we can gain market share because we have better products or better service or, you know, the customer mix that we have is going to be growing faster. That's how we're going to be above GDP going forward. But I think as an industry overall, that's the best way to think about it.

Okay. And in your negotiation with DuPont, is it fair to say that your objective is to have some kind of cap-on liabilities? Is that what you're trying to achieve? Or you're trying to achieve something else?

Yes. Again, you know, I'm not going to go through the details of the negotiation. But, you know, we're looking for some level of sharing between the two, you know, because as you know, today, we have – those liabilities are heading toward us. And so, from that standpoint, what's most important to us is the level of sharing and I think that's high on the list for us.

Okay, great. Thank you so much.

Your next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Your line is now open.

Thank you. And good morning, everyone. You know, just as we sit here in November, I know that you're probably starting your 2021 planning process. I wonder if you could just give us sort of some dimension around how you're thinking about both the, you know, the costs you took out this year, as well as the CapEx that came out this year? How much of that you might be able to keep out permanently versus brining back in 2021? And then, you know, to tie that into titanium, you know, when do you think you'll get back to the plan you were on coming into the year, which was to focus on, you know, really getting that that market share back? Thanks.

Yes, maybe just to get started on that, and then, I'll ask Sameer to sort of add some – a little bit of color from that standpoint on the cost. You're right. We're in no different than everyone else. We’re starting to do our planning, sort of hard to do perfect planning when you're in the middle of a pandemic, but we do see the recovery happening. You know, we see that continuing here in the fourth quarter, which I think is going to give us confidence going into 2021. We will continue to look at opportunities to gain market share on the TT side, as we've said. We did not want to be disruptive when the markets were sort of influx as they'd been, but I think we're getting to a point now where we're seeing things get a little bit more stable. We're able – as you can see from our volumes this quarter, I think we're going to be able to show some level of market share gains without having to do anything with price, basically, by driving with our customers that we're working with, as well as seeing some recovery in some of the markets where we have some advantage like laminates. You know, as from the cost perspective, maybe I'll ask Sameer to talk a little bit about the cost and CapEx side at least of how we're thinking about it right now.

Sure. Thanks, Mark. Hi, Vincent. And if you look at the actions that we took this year, on the cost side, you know, roughly $160 million worth of cross-out, I would say, you know, 80% is delivered by Q3. And as we're going to start looking at 2021, we expect to retain at least 20% of that next year. Still, you know, we're working on things to see what – how we can increase, but at least 20%, we feel pretty comfortable and confident that we can retain in 2021. And then, as you're going to look at the CapEx side, you know, we reduced the CapEx by $125 million this year from the initial guide that we had given of $400 million. You know, for CapEx, you know, the way you should think about Vincent for us is, you know, as we have told in the past, [run and] maintain roughly $225 million kind of a range and have another 50 million tied to the Corporate Responsibility Commitments that we have made. And then, we do have some growth initiatives that we want to bring along. But, you know, as we give the 2021 guide, we’ll be lot more transparent and give you guys the building blocks. But that's how you should roughly think about this thing, $225 million, roughly, run and maintain $50 million in the [indiscernible]. It varies year-by-year, but that's a Corporate Responsibility Commitments capital. And then, we do have some, you know, really high return growth stuff that we want to bring back.

Okay. Thank you very much, guys.

Your next question comes from the line of P.J. Juvekar from Citi. Please go ahead, your line is now open.

Hi, good morning, Mark. It’s Eric Petrie for P.J.

Good morning.

On the noted Opteon expansion into AutoZone and O'Reilly, what is the addressable market opportunity there? And what kind of growth rates should we expect? And is that retail exposure a drag or benefits to current margins?

Yeah, so that's a big opportunity for us and I don't know if Mark wants to add anything to the tail end of this one, but that's a huge opportunity for us. And remember, still early innings on the aftermarket, right, because it's only been just a few years since Opteon has been at the OEM level. So, you can look at this as a nice growth rate. You know, they're very solid margins, so these are plus margins above what you would have at the OEM level and the market is going to continue to grow as you have more and more vehicles out there that have Opteon in them. So having this direct channel, if you will, to these two very, very key players is extremely important for our future growth. And I don't know, Mark, if you want to add anything to them?

Yes. Mark, the other thing I would add is obviously, you know, you know the [SAAR] rates here in the U.S. and Europe, so think of that, you know, all of the U.S. by 2021, being on HFO technology, and then, think of that car park growing every year in terms of HFO, including Opteon usage. So significant car park already in the US and Europe and growing every year at [U.S. SAAR], so pretty significant growth near term and this is good business for us.

Helpful. Thank you. And then, secondly, TiO₂, do you expect continued margin expansion in the fourth quarter similar to competitor in current order books?

Well, we add our margins – you know, you saw our margins improve from obviously last quarter to this quarter. I think our margins will be similar as we're going into the fourth quarter. Where you're going to see the change in margin in terms of how that starts moving up is as we get more utilization on our facilities. So as volumes come into our – come into Chemours that's where you're going to see the margin expansion and we believe that'll be more in-line with 2021 than you'll see in the fourth quarter.

And Mark, the only other thing I would add is, you know, we continue to focus on running the business for cash. So, you know, we make those trade-offs as we look at margin versus cash as we go into the end of the year.

Your next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead, your line is now open.

Great. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to get your thoughts on maybe some of the consultant outlooks in TiO₂. It looks like, you know, maybe they have a small increase on price next year in the back half, maybe $50 a ton or 2%. And then, they also have, you know, maybe a larger decrease in feedstock assumptions maybe $100 a ton or so. And I guess, are you seeing, you know, that kind of trends in both in pricing, as well as costs over the next year? Is that something that you think could happen? Or could we see a larger increase in the back half of next year in pricing? Thanks.

So, you know, I'd say, you know, from a pricing perspective, we did see some, you know, nominal increases on our flex channel in the quarter. So we're seeing – you know, flex is a portal that we can use as market tightness goes forward. So, you know – my – you know, Mark commented right at the beginning that, you know, on an account level basis, you know, prices were stable sequentially. But we are starting to see, you know, some indications in the flex channel, you know, that we could take price, you know, over time. As it relates to ore, you know, we remain well supplied on ore and we see ore as quite stable in the current environment. So, you know, I wouldn't comment just early on in terms of what we would expect for ore, but other to say than the market seems quite stable to us today.

And then, just as a follow up, could you also, you know, maybe provide some color on where you think inventories are in different regions as well as exports? You know, it appears that, you know, the industry has gone through a couple years of pretty sizable destocking, yet, you know, maybe there's some skewness in these day sales measures because demand is down. So, would you say actual inventories are kind of normal or high or low, or how would you kind of characterize the inventory picture out there? Thanks.

Yes, I'd say sitting here today, you know, we think inventory levels are pretty normal. Obviously, you know, there was quite a bit of destocking last year, so we certainly are not dealing with a significant inventory overhang in our view. And obviously, you know, you saw the robust nature of sales improvements sequentially, and as that continues, you know, inventory from a days perspective, you know, would continue to come down. So, you know, our sense is, you know, we're in the early stages of a recovery, and you know, we see, you know, volume to the upside from where we sit today.

Hey, Arun. It’s Mark. Just to add to that, remember, the value proposition that we have in our ABA contracts is that customers don't have to add inventory, so they don't have to stock up, right? There's no logic for them that have to do that. They're not having to get in front of our price increase. So, you know, again, we believe that our customers, their volume is really demand related. And if we look across all the regions, we look across all the segments, we really believe that this is demand related, not inventory related. That said, as we start seeing, and as I mentioned, early on, we see a fourth quarter that is not your typical fourth quarter of seasonality. It appears to be continued strength in volume in the fourth quarter. We expect that, hopefully, to continue into the first quarter assuming that there's no issues, you know, with COVID-19 going forward. You know, our job is to make sure we have the inventory, in our side, available to our customers for their growth. So as we look at, you know how to manage cash for the rest of the year, Mark said it really well, we are managing for cash. But at the same time, we want to make sure we have the inventory our customers need as they grow into the next quarter. So we're always looking at that. But inventory in the channel, I think, is very normal. In fact, I'd say, is not anticipated, if you will, inventory bills, as you would normally see in a typical cycle because of the nature of our ABA contracts.

Great, thanks.

Yes.

Your next question comes from the line of Roger Spitz with Bank of America. Please go ahead, your line is now open.

Thank you and good morning. How much zircon are you producing and selling in metric tons? Is that most all from the [indiscernible] in Georgia mine? Or is it also from the old [indiscernible] mine?

Yes, it's from both. It's from our own mines down in Florida and Georgia. We don't break that out right now, Roger, from that standpoint, but all the zircon that we produce is out of both Florida and Georgia.

Got it. And in terms of Nafion membranes, can you give us any sense of what percent of Fluroproducts sales that is? I mean, is it a couple of percent or less meaningful or more meaningful?

We…

It – sorry, Mark.

Yes, I would say we don't break out that product line usage, but it would be it would be a more meaningful percent than what you quoted.

Yeah. And I say, Roger, Nafion from a membrane standpoint is something that we're probably going to bring forward early next year to everybody and talk a little bit more about because it's always been, you know, a product line that we've had. It's been increasing around the fuel cell side, but really where we see the biggest opportunity is going to be in hydrogen generation. So, we'll probably break that out to you guys in a maybe a very specific way to share where we see the growth opportunities on Nafion sometime in the first half of next year.

Okay, so it's not just using core alkaline membrane cells right now. You're saying, it's also used in some fuel cells as well, at the moment?

Yeah, it's used in all three, right? It's used in chloralkali, which is the traditional place for it. It’s used in fuel cells. Remember, DuPont was one of the originators of fuel cell technology. So, it's used in fuel cells, and it's used in hydrogen membranes, all three today.

Thank you very much.

Yes.

And there are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to Mark Vergnano, CEO for any closing comments.

Great. Well, thank you all. Thanks for taking the time this morning. I know we're in some strange times. I don't know if it can get any stranger. You know, after going through the – what was a wild night from the Presidential Election, and I have a feeling it's going to be a wild few days. But I do want to just reinforce you know, we feel very good about the quarter we just had. We feel very good about where things are leading toward the next quarter. And hopefully, you know, our goal is continually to be managing this business for cash, making sure that we're delivering everything that our customers need, and making sure all our employees are safe as we get through this pandemic. So, all I’d say is, thank you all very much for your time. Thanks for your interest. Please stay safe and stay well.

And ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.