Good day, and welcome to the CBIZ Third Quarter and Nine Months 2017 Results Conference Call and Webcast. [Operator Instructions] Please note, this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Lori Novickis. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Judith. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us for the CBIZ third quarter and nine months 2017 results conference call. In connection with this call, today's press release has been posted on the Investor Relations page of our website, www.cbiz.com. This call is also being webcast. A link to the live webcast as well as a replay can also be found on our website. Before we begin our presentation, we would like to remind you that during the call, management may discuss non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of these measures to comparable GAAP measures can be found on the financial tables of today's press release. Finally, remember that management may also make forward-looking statements. Such statements are based on current information and management's expectations as of this date and do not guarantee future performance. Forward-looking statements involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that can be difficult to predict. Actual results can and sometimes do differ materially. A more detailed description of such risks and uncertainties can be found in the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Joining us for today's call are Jerry Grisko, President and CEO and Ware Grove, Chief Financial Officer. I will now turn the call over to Jerry Grisko for his opening remarks. Jerry.

Thank you, Lori and good morning everyone. As we indicated in the release that we issued earlier this morning. We experienced a number of unusual events in the third quarter that had an adverse impact on our revenue and earnings. We'll go into greater detail on our call today to be sure that you understand of these events and the impact on our results. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 we reported total revenue growth of 6.3% off which 1.7% is organic growth, a 10 basis point increase in our pre-tax and an increase in operating income from continuing operations of 12.5%. Fully diluted earnings per share is up by 7.8% over the prior year. Within those nine months results total revenue within our finance services group is up by 5.9% with same unit revenue up 2.8%. Within the benefits in insurance group, total revenue grew by 7.8% and same unit revenue declined slightly by 0.3%. Turning to the third quarter, our total revenue increased by 4% or by $7.9 million. Within our total revenue results our Financial Services group grew by 5.9% and our Benefits and Insurance group grew by 1%. However, our same unit revenue declined by 0.8% for the third quarter compared with the year ago, of that financial service same unit was down by 0.6%, in benefit and insurance same unit revenue declined by 1.4%. As we commented in our press release, Hurricane Irma had a major impact on our financial services offices located in Boca Raton in Tampa, Florida. September is one of the busiest months of the year for our financial services group and we're typically working at full capacity preparing tax returns that are required to be completed in time for the September and October filing deadlines, as a result of…

Thank you Jerry and good morning, everyone. Let me take a few minutes to run through some additional highlights of the results we reposted this morning, the third quarter and nine months ended September 30. We've closed on three acquisition so far this year. Combined with earn out payments on prior acquisitions we've used approximately $38.4 million of cash through September 30 for acquisition related payments. Future spending for earn outs on prior year acquisitions is projected at approximately $900,000 in the fourth quarter this year. Approximately $14 million next year in 2018, approximately $13.8 million in 2019 and then approximately $17.1 million in 2020. We used approximately $4.6 million in the third quarter this year to repurchase approximately 308,000 shares. For the nine months this year, we've used approximately $8.8 million to repurchase approximately 615,000 shares. As we've commented in recent conference calls, our first priority for the use of capital is to focus on strategic acquisitions and we continue to take a somewhat opportunistic approach towards using capital to repurchase shares. We have plenty of financing capacity and this does gives us the flexibility to address both possible acquisitions and potential share repurchases as opportunities occur. The balance outstanding on our credit facility at September 30, 2017 was $205 million. This results in debt compared to underlying EBITDA with approximately 2.1 times leverage and this provides CBIZ with about $142 million of unused borrowing capacity under our $400 million credit facility. Capital spending for the nine months was $8.9 million this year a good share of which was driven by expenditures associated with office moves in both the New York and Boston markets. Full year capital spending maybe approximately $10 million this year for 2017. Capital spending is more typically within a range of approximately $5 million to…

Thank you, Ware. Just a couple of other comments. On our last call we commented on our acquisition of CMF Associates the private equity focused business that was acquired in June, 2017. While we're in the early stages of executing our strategy building out our advisory services focused on the private equity industry. We're very encouraged by the progress that we've made in this area thus far and the initial performance to CMF. We also continue to pursue a full pipeline of acquisition opportunities to bolster this another high growth areas in our business and as Ware explained, we've plenty of borrowing capacity under our existing credit line to capitalize on those opportunities when they become available. Also we mentioned earlier, the Hurricane that struck South Florida in September. I want to take just a moment to recognize and thank all of our team members who rose to the occasion to safeguard our facilities, our data and our property and to mitigate the impact of these storms on our associates and their families, our clients and the overall operation to the business. With that I'll turn it over for Q&A.

[Operator Instructions] your first question is from Jim MacDonald with First Analysis. Please go ahead.

Just want to dive into some of these issues, see if I can get some more details. So maybe you could tell me like the percent of revenue you have in Florida and as a start and then, on the government contracts they were delayed. It doesn't sound that like they were delayed due to the hurricane, so is that delay just going to be recovered or will that just be spread out later?

Jim thanks. This is Ware. I'll just answer the first part of that question and then Jerry and I can pitch in and answer the rest of your questions. But we have fairly significant operations based in Tampa and in Boca Raton and that's probably 5% to 8% of our total financial services revenue. We have seasonal work, it's very much loaded towards the first half of the year through mid second quarter, but we have a second busy season and that's typically in September and October and that's why right in the middle of the second busy season, this had such an impact on our results.

Jim, I'll take the second part of that question which had to the government healthcare consulting contracts. As you would expect in that business it's not unusual to have delays from time-to-time in the start of a contract or in funding the contract and that's exactly what happened in this quarter. We had four significant contracts that were delayed either the start of the contract or the authorization to fund a particular contract. The unusual part is to have that number of that size in a given period and in particular in a given period which tends to be a softer quarter for us. So it was really the impact of those contracts in that quarter that we wanted to highlight, having said that those contracts as I indicated in my comments those contracts have commenced and there is a considerable amount of that work that will be completed and is really being required to be completed by year end. Although some of it will certainly carry into 2018.

Yes, okay and then maybe move into benefits. That was not hurricane related and I believe and you mentioned two or three elements I think that impacted benefits maybe you could go into little more detail there.

Yes, so we looked at the benefits and insurance group really in kind of two segments. One is what we consider our core services which is our employee benefits and our property and casualty, 401k, retirement plan services and payroll. In all of those businesses when you combine their operation showed incremental organic growth and improvement. Where we had the decline in revenue, quarter-over-quarter it came in what we consider really are more transactional businesses which are life insurance and recruiting in particular and as you would surmise, when businesses like that life insurance policy tends to be episodic, executive search tends to be episodic, so the revenues in any given period of time there, are hard to predict because they come in, as the projects come. So those are really the two particular areas that impacted us this quarter over the prior quarter that we wanted to call out.

And that's makes me circle back to some of the big picture question, so your employment reports that you put out have been sort of softer I would say then what the government puts out for the nation as a whole. What is your view on that? I mean do you - is there - how are you seeing the economy and is it different then how the government's report it?

Yes so it's interesting. The report that you're referring to is issued by our payroll company that report is of 4,000 companies with under 300 employees and it actually tends to be at a very, they call it Small Business Index. It tends to be at the very small end of the market. Our clients, ourselves tend to be what we consider small middle market business and often times they're considerably larger than the clients that are being reflected in that index that's tracked by our payroll company. So what we're seeing is really the same types of things that you're reading in the paper and all the indicators are really positive. If you look at the most recent report of one of the publications that we track closely, the National Center for Middle Market. Which really measures companies with revenues between $10 million and $1 billion? The 85% of the respondents are confident in their local economy, 83% national, those are all up from prior periods of time, 70% of those reported increase in the revenue in the third quarter. most are expecting increase in hiring and when they talk about their biggest challenge, one of their biggest challenge is finding talent and the follow-up there is that three times the number of respondents indicated that they will be considering increasing their benefits, increasing their compensation, increasing their - other things that are necessary for them to attract employment. All of those things are very positive for our businesses where we work alongside our clients to help them in that analysis. So we look more of that indicator in our payroll indicator for our own clients and the help of the business and all the indicators we're looking at, indicate that we're in a very favorable business climate.

Just one last one for me at this point. So to get even to the low end of your EPS guidance, you're going to have to have a relatively profitable fourth quarter when typically you have sort of flat to maybe even negative fourth quarter. How confident are you that you can really get back to the low end of your EPS guidance?

Jim, this is Ware that's a great question. And you're right seasonally third and fourth quarter and particularly fourth quarter is pretty flat and hard to predict. If you say a good share maybe half plus or minus of the impact in the third quarter was still into the fourth quarter and the third quarter impact was estimated at $0.04 to $0.05 a share, take $0.02 to $0.03 of the $0.04 to $0.05 and against the breakeven issue or the $0.01 lost last year, that helps us get to bridge to where you're trying to get to. The other thing I will point out this year is the unpredictable nature of the stock compensation impact on the tax rate. So it ticked up a bit higher this year. We still are predicting 36%, so you'll probably get some beneficial impact from an effective tax rate that should be closer to 36% for the full year and that will run through the fourth quarter.

Okay, thanks a lot guys.

Your next question is from Joan Tong with Sidoti & Company. Please go ahead.

So when you talk about some of those works that were lost, might not come back in the fourth quarter, might show up in the first quarter. So I assume those are all financial services like taxation type of work. But you also mentioned a number of - some advisory work, it's lower because obviously your people have to like focus on catching up on those taxation work. So are those advisory work being lost and clients walk away to go to somebody else and just because you don't enough body to work on it.

Hi, Joan its Jerry. The answer is the days go away, the work doesn't necessarily go away. But we have fewer days to perform the work. So what's not likely happening is that the client has a need for advisory services and because we're constrained with the number of days. They'll go to someone else to get that work done, that's not really what happens. What ends up happening is, the days that you would have available to be speaking with clients and to be uncovering that type of work and therefore performing those work. There's fewer of those days because you're taking those days and performing the work that was carrying over from the third quarter that really should have been completed in the third quarter. So it's really just a product of having fewer days, when the more business days you have, the more opportunities you have to work alongside your clients and uncover those types of opportunities and then fulfil those opportunities.

Okay then can you talk about your pipeline for advisory work. Is it still pretty strong because you have been talking about that for a couple of quarters already in terms of picking up of those type of work and activities?

Yes, Joan. So we survey all offices regularly and certainly at the end of the quarter and just to get their sentiment and although the information that we receive back is somewhat anecdotal I will tell you that it continues to be very strong in more of our offices than not, that the demand for our advisory consulting type services and again it's consistent with the information I shared on kind of business sentiment which is generally positive outlooks at least in their local economy. Generally positive outlooks in their industries, expectations if they're going to expand investments, expectations that increase employment. All of which are indicators and usually good triggers for them to turn to us and help them with those decisions.

Okay, that's fair and then for the healthcare consulting. The delay of those projects. I assume those are additional work and it may be increasing scope within the states that you already doing work at, or are we talking about like you're getting more - because I think you're already at 40 states, am I correct?

Yes we're actually at 49 states that we do work for. But the work that we're getting. Well let's separate this. The work that we talked about today, earlier that was delayed is of the same type of work that we do for portfolio of states around the country. It just happened to be larger contracts in a couple of states that all kind of happened at the same time. So that's a separate issue. The other question that I hear is, you're already doing work for ex number of states, it's 49 and is there opportunity to continue to grow and expand that work. And the answer to that is also yes. Because when you consider that in some states we do very little work even though it's a states that we count in 49 that we're representing, we do very little work for them and there's lots for opportunities for us to expand the services that we provide to those states. So we're optimistic about that business as we have historically been and despite the little bit of an impact that we had in the third quarter from the delayed contracts, we still remain confident that they will hit the expectations that we have for the businesses for the full year.

And how about on the federal side and any update?

Not particularly, that won't contract. Can we just call that out because kind of going back several calls ago, we called that one out because it was a large contract. We were encouraged by the fact that we were making some entrée into the federal government. We're still encouraged by that and we continue to get some additional contracts through the federal government. The other thing that happened there was that contract was delayed, but has since resumed and it is now kind of tracking annually where we would have expected its track. Having said that, that is one large contract but we have a lot of large contracts in that business. So just kind of keep that in mind.

Okay, got it. And then on the insurance and the benefit side. We have seen some improvements like couple of quarters already so we're back down to a negative territory in terms of organic comparison. So do you feel like this is a derail from the improvement trends? It has been disappointing for quite some time already. What has to happen for that particular business to grow again?

Okay, so again I'm going to separate the business into two. One is our kind of more episodic types businesses transactional oriented which are the life insurance type services and some of our executive search services and some of the other things that are tend to be more project oriented and that's what really impacted the results for the third quarter most significantly. Having said that, within the other what we consider core lines of business which are property and casualty and payroll and retirement plan services and employee benefits. I would say the first three of those property and casualty, retirement plan and payroll all are on solid footing and are performing well. The last piece of that which is our employee benefits business has historically performed well. We've had challenges over the past couple of years principally because really the number of producers that we have in that business. If you look at our - the business developers or the producers in that business. They typically perform at a very high decile of industry expectations, so the people that we have on our team are first best in class, first rate doing very well, but it's not reasonable to think that we're going to get a lot more productivity out of that those same producers. So what we've done really off late, although it takes some time to take hold, is we've really put an effort in increasing the number of producers that we have within that group. What that requires is that we have an active recruiting program and we do, we have internal resources that are working on that, then we have a program that's designed around helping them to become to be successful when they join us and we have those programs designed, then we train them on processes and we have mentorship program. So we have all of those things in place, we have an active recruiting program in place, we track the number of new producers every month against our goals and objectives and we would expect that overtime that initiative more than other would help us regain the organic revenue growth that we would expect to see out of that business.

And can you just remind us, how long you have been having that initiative that's on the employee benefit side of things?

In earnest probably 12 months.

Okay.

Although it's taken some time to really again to make sure that we have the foundation in place to be successful. The other thing to note there is that, like many other things not 100% of hirers will what we call validate which is really kind of hit the expectations that are set for them. So there will be a number of hired and a number will succeed and a number will not succeed. Our objective is to put the processes in the structure in place to increase those percentages as best we can.

Okay and then going into the next year. If I just look at like those two lumpy sort of relatively more lumpy business life insurance as well as the I think the executive recruiting business. Should we think about, it's going to be easier comp year-over-year for next year heading into 2018 because this year might be a little bit less work and creating some easier comp that might create some tailwinds for you.

The answer is, I would expect that it would be an easier comp. we believe about the size - are the right size for us today to support the businesses that we have. Having said that in any given period of time we could actually have a revenue boost and an earnings boost based on success on those units and then it will be another difficult comp 12 months later. So we like the businesses, we think they're important to have those businesses in order to be able to support our clients, but they do tend to be less predictable from period-to-period.

Okay, got it. In terms of share buyback I guess you guys are still pretty opportunistic and even though you do have a co-brand so, the pressure on the stock today create some opportunity, Ware?

Yes that's possible. And you're right, we tend to look at the volatility in the share price i.e. share price pull backs and that creates an opportunity to get more actively involved in share purchases.

Fair enough guys. Thank you so much.

Your next question is from is a follow-up from Jim MacDonald with First Analysis. Please go ahead.

Yes just had a couple small technical ones. So G&A was good this quarter do you also expect G&A savings next quarter, is there a reason for that maybe compensation, accruals or - and what about the lawsuit expenditures of those gone away?

Hi, Jim this Ware. I think in the past we've said we would expect year-over-year overtime kind of 10 to 20 basis points improvement in the leverage on G&A and you're right because of the lumpiness of lawsuit expenditures and bonus accruals that get accrued and trued up. There may be some minor lumpiness to it, but I think the way to think about it is, over a longer period of time year-over-year. Expect 10 to 20 basis points improvement in the leverage as a percent of revenue.

I just asked because you had pretty high G&A last year and in the fourth quarter, so is that going to be an easy comp this fourth quarter because I'm trying to model fourth quarter.

Yes, I don't recall exactly what would have cost higher than normal G&A levels, last year. It could have been some as I reference some of the year end true ups that can occur from time-to-time I just don't recall off the top of my head. But I don't see anything unusual in the horizon this year that will cause us any unusual differences in the trend you're seeing so far this year.

Okay and then one other area so, last year the cash flow in the third quarter the debt was reduced more significantly than it was this year. You talked about accounts receivable and how that's sort of a technical issue and not an issue, but just maybe discuss cash flow in the third quarter and debt repayment and was the higher receivable in issue in having less debt repayment, less cash flow.

Yes, that's great question. I'm not sure I can clearly outline and isolate the third quarter. But I can talk about year-to-date, we're very happy with where we're at. We've increased our borrowing versus year end by approximately $15 million to-date so far. But we've also funded about $38 million of acquisitions spending for the year and another $8 million or $9 million of share repurchase activity. So there is good plus $45 million I'll call it non-operating uses of cash, which kind of solves you to roughly $35 million of positive cash flow from operating activities. The fourth quarter should enhance that as it normally does, the second half of the year we source a lot of cash as opposed to used cash in the first half. So I think we're on track. I just don't - unless there is unusually high level of acquisition spending in the third quarter that impacted it. [Technical difficulty] The operating activities are on track and generating the kind of cash they should. Hopefully that answers your questions. The DSO impact was really more of an accounting thing as we account for what we'll call agency bill relationships under property and casualty. But the underlying cash flow is really impacted one way or another when we account for it that way.

So that doesn't affect the cash flow. The agency don't really.

No it really doesn't. When the cash comes in and it comes in as it would otherwise. But when we agency bill, we actually do record a receivable earlier then we would have we direct billed and just received the commission on a cash basis.

Okay, great thanks.

This concludes our question-and-answer session I would like to turn the conference back over to Mr. Grisko for any closing remarks.