Alex Vetter
Chief Executive Officer
Sure. First of all, Sameet, on the national front, we certainly have seen the trend in 2018, to be one of headwinds, and certainly you don’t need to go far to see the OEM changes that they’re making, particularly in the latter half of 2018, where we saw some of our significant pull back. And so we’re being cautious going into 2019, knowing that there could be increased volatility. I know there is softness in new car sales in 2019, to start the year which more directly correlates to this channel. I would tell you from a gross profitability standpoint, the national business is some of our most profitable revenue, because we’re running ads across our existing traffic base. And what’s impressed me this year, is that we’ve been able to deliver our EBITDA targets, despite headwinds in the national business, which I think, underscores some of the operational efficiency moves, we’ve made in 2018, to take out legacy costs and to modernize the system. Increasingly going forward, a lot of our product innovation is moving into programmatic channels, that we’ll actually have even less overhead to support our clients direct buying in excess of our systems, and more native products and solutions, that don’t require the same legacy traditional advertising model to implement or support. And so our business strategy on national is to move toward more data-driven partnerships, that provide OEM’s, real-time integrations into the system, which I think will offset some of the profitability concerns in terms of slower muted national revenue outlook for 2019. On the second part, and Becky can certainly add to that. On the lead quality part, what I would tell you, part of the beauty of what I see in the mid-term and long-term, is that there is an increase in the amount of analytics companies coming in and helping dealers analyze their marketing effectiveness. And we are 100%, behind supporting the growth of those entities, because the more dealers use actual data, versus gut to discern what’s working for them, there hasn’t been an analytics company that hasn’t affirmed our value, or shown a much higher rate of return then what the dealerships were getting on their own. However, I think anytime Cars.com were to invest, or partner with, or acquire a third-party analytics company, it’s somewhat refutes the objectivity, or the independence of their analysis. And so, while yes, I would love to see a faster acceleration of analytics, in demonstrating our value, I think the approach to it is more to help partner and provide those companies with access to our data, which we’re now giving our data openly to some of the independent exchanges, the CRM companies we’re partnering with them, to make sure that their tagging our information properly, and we are inorganically helping those companies grow by partnering with them as opposed to buying them and/or trying to own them outright. I hope that makes sense.