Good afternoon, and welcome to the Boyd Gaming First Quarter 2015 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today’s presentation there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator Instructions] Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Josh Hirsberg. Please go ahead.

Thank you, Amy. Good afternoon everyone, and welcome to our first quarter earnings conference call. Joining me on the call this afternoon is Keith Smith, our President and Chief Executive Officer. Our comments today will include statements that are forward-looking statements within the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. All forward-looking statements in our comments are as of today’s date and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statement. There are certain risks and uncertainties that include but are not limited to those disclosed in our earnings release, our periodic reports and our other filings with the SEC that may materially impact our actual results. Here in our call today we’ll make references to non-GAAP financial measures. For a complete reconciliation of historical non-GAAP to GAAP financial measures, please refer to our earnings press release and our Form 8-K furnished to the SEC today, and both of which are available in the Investor Section of website at boydgaming.com. We do not provide a reconciliation of forward-looking non-GAAP financial measures due to our inability to project special charges and certain expenses. Finally, today’s call is also being webcast live on our website, boydgaming.com and will be available for replay on the Investor Relations section of our website shortly after the completion of this call. I’d now like to turn the call over to Keith Smith. Keith.

Thanks Josh, and good afternoon everyone. Thank you for joining us today for our first quarter earnings call. This is another great quarter for our company as we built on the positive momentum that began in the second half of 2014. The operational restructuring we completed in the middle of 2014 has delivered clear results throughout the business. And our strategic initiative to enhance our non-gaming amenities is delivering encouraging results, another important part of our performance. On the customer side, we are seeing signs that the consumer is getting healthier, growing more confident and spending more. There is still considerable room for improvement with the consumer and we need to see more durability. But the trends are encouraging and continue to move in the right direction. For the quarter, this resulted in modest but broad-based revenue growth of approximately 2% which we were able to convert into an 11% gain in EBITDA. This performance repeats the impressive flow through we achieved in the fourth quarter and represents the fourth straight quarter we have improved operating margins across our business. Our management teams across the country are doing an excellent job keeping their focus on operational execution, growing the business and maintaining cost controls. Let’s walk through what we saw in each segment. In Las Vegas, the fundamentals of both the Las Vegas market, the Las Vegas locals market and our locals business remain solid. The southern Nevada economy is strengthening, the local population is growing, more people have jobs, visitation is rising and consumers are spending more. This is translating in the continued growth throughout our locals business especially in our non-gaming areas where we delivered our seventh consecutive quarter throw [ph]. In addition, results of The Orleans and Gold Coast were solid in the first quarter with growth…

Thanks Keith. During the quarter we continued to make progress in strengthening our balance sheet by reducing debt by more than $80 million. Our quarter in debt and cash balances were provided to you in our earnings release. In terms of capital expenditures, during the quarter we invested $19 million, including $7 million at Peninsula. Separately, Borgata’s capital expenditures were $5 million during the quarter. Much of our capital spending is scheduled for later this year and as a result we continue to expect to meet our previously issued guidance for capital expenditures. In terms of EBITDA guidance, we are raising our guidance to incorporate first quarter performance. As noted in our release, we expect wholly on EBITDA after the deduction for corporate expense and including Peninsula and 50% of Borgata’s EBITDA to be in the range of $542 million to $567 million for the full year of 2015. This guidance incorporates the following expectations. In the Las Vegas locals segment, we expect road construction to impact the Suncoast in the second quarter. This disruption impacted the first quarter by $1 million in EBITDA and we expect a similar impact to the business n Q2. Excluding this impact at Suncoast, we expect our Las Vegas locals and downtown businesses to each grow EBITDA year-over-year by 2% to 3%. We expect EBITDA in each of our Midwest and South and Peninsula segments to grow year-over-year EBITDA by 3% to 4%. The growth expectations that I just discussed for the full year are also good indications for our second quarter EBITDA performance. At Borgata we are increasing our EBITDA expectations to $160 million to $165 million, but which we will accord 50% in our results. Our expectations for Borgata include an assumption of increased property taxes for 2015. Borgata has performed impressively in a highly competitive market. Borgata’s leverage ratio at the end of the first quarter was 4.2x down from over 7x leverage in March of 2014. This property is clearly running on all cylinders. Beyond its capital program, excess cash flow will be used to continue to deleverage Borgata’s balance sheet. In conclusion, we had another solid quarter. The operating trends in our business are improving. We’ve taken cost out of our business such that we’re able to improve margins and grow EBITDA. And our capital plans are targeted to capture how customers are spending their money. With that, Amy, that concludes our remarks and we’re now ready to take any questions from the listeners.

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our first question comes from Felicia Hendrix of Barclays.

Hi. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Keith, you gave us a lot of very good colorful detail about what’s going on in your various regions and you talked about the many successes in the Midwest and the South given your cost-cutting efforts and revenue-enhancing strategies and you highlighted several properties that have done well. Just wondering in that region where is there still more work to do? And while Josh kind of estimated this in the guidance, before we get too excited in terms of the margins you reported in that region in Midwest and South, do you think those levels are sustainable?

Thanks for the question, Felicia. Couple of comments. One, I think there is more work to do everywhere. While I think we had a very good quarter, posted some very good numbers, there’s continued room for improvement at I think each and every one of those properties in the Midwest and South and in the Peninsula group. I think the margins are sustainable. Once again we posted kind of four straight quarters of margin improvement. It’s not coming out of any one area. They tend to be broad-based refinements to the business, whether it’s payroll or marketing or other costs in the business. And the team is just intensely focused on improving results. So I think we’ll continue to see kind of improvements across the board.

Okay, great. And then just as a follow up, in Lake Charles, I know that the outcome thus far is a lot better than everyone expected initially and January was certainly strong. And then Delta Downs had about a flattish February and then was down about 4% in March. So just kind of wondering, that trajectory issue, we read into that too much, what are you seeing there right now in terms of your property going forward?

No. Actually, I don’t think you should read anything into the trajectory. It is choppy for month-to-month depending on what competitors may be doing or depending on how we may have done in a prior month, given a specific promotion we may have had, or even the movement of the calendar. Simply swapping a weekend day for a weekday can move a number of Delta Downs to $500,000 in revenue. And so there are those subtleties that take place. But I will tell you, you should not read anything into the trajectory. The Delta business, when you look through April, continues to be very strong.

Great. Thank you so much.

Sure

The next question comes from Thomas Allen at Morgan Stanley.

Hey. Good afternoon, guys, and congrats on the 40 year anniversary.

Thank you, Thomas.

So on his call a couple of days ago, we see when [ph] - your pretty negative outlook on Vegas, again, highlighted some of the kind of forward booking data going into the summer. Clearly you have a pretty different customer base. But can you give - can you put your kind of optimism in the context of his comments?

I would say this that as we look through the second quarter, Thomas, that the trends that we saw in the first quarter are continuing into the second quarter. I would tell you I think we had a - we’re having a good April. May is certainly shaping up to be a good month. And June is probably looking a little soft, but June typically looks a little soft. I can’t speak in a lot of detail kind of about the July, August, September bookings right now. I just don’t have it in front of me. There’s nothing that gives me concern. Look, the locals economy continues to be very strong with employment op, with the housing market doing well, a number of electrometer hookups. All of these point to a continued strength into the locals market from an economic standpoint. Taxable sales are up. I understand what Mr. William said but I think there are some positive signs out there across the board.

Perfect. Thank you. And then we’ve gotten 23 minutes about anyone asking you for an update on opco/propco discussion. Do you mind touching on it quickly?

I’m not sure I’m familiar with that topic. All kidding aside. As we’ve said on previous calls, this is something that we continue to evaluate. And when we have something definitive to say, we’ll come out and say it at that point. Our goal is to determine if pursuing this path will create longer term sustainable increases in shareholder value. And so we’ll continue to look at it and analyze it. And once again, if we have something to say, we’ll say it.

And just a quick numbers question. Is there a way to quantify the benefit to - of lower field cost to your downtown business, for the Hawaii charter business? Is that significant or do you have a number? That would be great. Thanks.

Yes. Tom, this is Josh. I would say that of the increase that we saw in the first quarter, attributable to Downtown, about half of it was related to fuel and the rest was related to running the business sufficiently and cash inflow [ph] through from the revenue growth.

Thanks, Josh.

Yes.

Thank you. Bye-bye.

The next question is from Shaun Kelley at Bank of America.

Hi. This is Barry Jonas, in for Sean. Just had a couple of questions. First, in regards to the Borgata property tax, can you maybe just give a little more color to help us model that for the remainder of the year?

Yes. I don’t think we’re in a position to do that at this point. We’ve made our own kind of assumptions based on information that we’ve gathered and the experience we have in the marketplace. But I think until we get a better idea of what the rate is we’ll stick to the liquidity [ph] comes July, August timeframe. I don’t think we want to kind of there, Barry.

Okay, great. And then just in terms of the guidance increase, how much of that is just flowing through maybe a stronger Q1 than was expected as opposed to just optimism for the remainder of the year?

Yes, it’s really - Barry, it’s a good question. It’s all really reflective of what happened in Q1. I think when we looked at the performance in Q1, we continue to really believe that it’s difficult to discern how much is weather [ph] and how much is a stronger consumer. I think we believe we’ll get more color and visibility into that in the second quarter when we have more comparable numbers. And I think from our perspective, while we had a good quarter in the first quarter, we want to really see not only how much of it is the consumer and where the consumer kind of - how the consumer feels, but just - and Keith mentioned it in his remarks, we want to see some consistency, some broad based durability and continuity with respect to the consumer spend. And that’s really hard to discern from the business that we saw in Q1. So we extrapolate, we basically built in all of Q1, kind of looked at where kind of business was trending for the rest of the year, and that’s what is reflected in the guidance.

Got it. And then last one for me, you gave some positive commentary on Treasure Chest in the opening comments. Just wondering, is that a - in regards to the smoking ban in New Orleans, how do you see that benefitting the property?

I think - Barry, this is Keith, it’s a little early to make any determination or assessment. It’s probably been one weekend, maybe 10 days at this point. And so - then they’ve had some pretty bad weather down there over the last 10 days. So we truly are to understand if there’s any impact at all to that. The improvements we saw in Q1 which are similar to the improvements we saw in Q4 are all just about increased visitation and just driving the business better. We’ll obviously monitor the smoking situation and see if we get any benefit out of it. But at this point, we don’t know.

Okay. Thanks so much.

You’re welcome.

Our next question comes from Carlos Santarelli, Deutsche Bank.

Hey, guys. Good afternoon. Just following up on the opco/propco question earlier. I think one of the statements you guys made when you first discussed that option was when you made your determination we would know. So my question is more along the lines of as you think about it today, and the company obviously has done some work with deleveraging and generating free cash flow to pay down debt. When you look out at the transaction landscape today in the U.S., is there anything that has changed over, say, the last three to six months?

In terms of being able to execute a transaction, Carlos?

In terms of - I would say, yes, the landscape multiple, things of that discussions to any extent that you’ve had any?

Yes. I would say that really there’s plenty of things that we have found to potentially acquire. It’s less - it’s more about finding what makes strategic sense for the company, has the ability to generate free cash flow and deleverage the business. Same criteria we’ve had really for quite some time in terms of being able to, I guess, engage in a potential conversation around acquisitions. I would say generally we have not been precluded from pursuing any that kind of fit our criteria. So strategically, we continue to look at the REIT [ph] as a strategic alternative, we look at acquisitions as a strategic alternative, and we look at other things as well. And we just balance all those alternatives. I would say pretty clearly today, we don’t feel precluded from any of those options in terms of being able to execute on our various strategic initiatives.

Great. Thanks, Josh. And then if I could, just one housekeeping. I know you said your CapEx spend was the same, but just to kind of refresh, it was $100 million for Boyd and Peninsula on the maintenance side and then another $45 million or so in project if I’m not mistaken?

Yes. That’s pretty close. It was $100 million in maintenance for Boyd and then $15 million in maintenance for Peninsula, and then about $45 million of the kind of strategic capital, the reposition - the non-gaming amenities. So in total, it’s about $160 million, Carlos.

And Borgata remains unchanged, that kind of $25 million and $15 million?

Yes, exactly.

Okay, great. Thanks, Josh.

Thank you.

Our next question is from Harry Curtis at Nomura.

Hi, guys. I’m all set. Thanks.

All right. Thanks, Harry.

And we have time for one last question and that comes from Larry Haberdie [ph] at TAMCO.

Yes.

Hey, Larry.

Hi, Josh. A couple of quick questions. One, there’s a couple of events in Las Vegas this May that are somewhat unusual and they may result in excess business, the fight this weekend and then Rock in Rio which is going to put hundreds of thousands of people into the town. Are you going to be able to capitalize on this in terms of rates in your hotels and possibly play?

Hey, Larry, this is Keith. We clearly will be able to capitalize to some extent on this coming weekend with the fight in town by being able to leverage up our room rates. Unfortunately, the fight was booked late in the cycle. And so I think many of us had prior bookings and has filled the hotels with other business because you don’t wait until the last minute to fill the hotel. But the rooms we have left, we’ve clearly been able to take advantage of higher room rates and we certainly expect to get some good casino business throughout the week. And with respect to Rock in Rio, once again we’re able to kind of leverage up rates a little bit. We’ll see exactly what that customer - what the gaming profile of that customer is that will - whether that looks like the customer that comes in June for the other music festival we have here, the Electric Daisy Carnival, or whether it’s a different customer, we’ll just have to wait and see.

And then second, with the insufficiencies that you’re getting, are some of them related to taking slots out and/or changing participation game ratios?

No. I would say that our slot replacement cycle is fairly normal. Our participation, games, we’re looking at all the time to make sure that they are productive. I couldn’t quote you today the number of games we have now versus later. It’s probably pretty flat. But, yes, it’s the cost we’re taking out of the business really is across the board in - once again, as I said in my prepared comments from payroll to marketing costs to other costs.

Great. Thanks, Keith.

You’re welcome.

That does conclude our question and answer session. Would you like to make any closing remarks, Mr. Hirsberg?