Jason Bonfigt
Analyst · Cowen & Company. Please go ahead
Thank you, Stephanie. Turning to Slide 8, sales for the quarter were $29.6 million in line with our guidance 30% lower than prior year, primarily driven by a 63% decrease in tower sold. A result of our tower customers reduced purchases in order to draw down a component in inventories. Partially offsetting the tower segment decline with additional sales associated with the Red Wolf acquisition and continues to strength the end markets where our gearing segment participates in. Leading up to Q3, we had a favorable sales comparisons that were primarily driven by the tower demand to support the PTC qualification factors. However the lower tower production levels moved our year-to-date comparison down approximately 3% versus the prior year. Gross profit margins reduced to 3.4% from 12.5% last year primarily result of low tower facility capacity utilization. And we had an operating loss of $1.8 million in the quarter and a $900,000 of EBITDA. Both well below previous quarter run rates, but in line with the guidance we outlined last quarter. The EBITDA result included the release of the $1.4 million contingent earn out liability related to the Red Wolf acquisition which was based on our most recent EBITDA forecast being below earn out threshold levels. Conversely we had several unfavorable items that we are classifying as our other shift impacts or other non-recurring items. These included approximately $250,000 of tower material written off due to a discontinued tower design, $300,000 of adjustments related to increases in expected claims costs associated with the previous period self-insured workers' compensation programs. And the residual impact of the self-insured healthcare insurance associated with the reduction in workforce. Lastly we incurred an additional $300,000 to $400,000 of gearing and ramp up costs related to supporting the order growth we've have seen in 2017. Year-to-date EBITDA is $6.7 million versus $7.1 million in the prior year comparison. I would note that despite the tower volume decline EBITDA margins have only slightly declined year-over-year, highlighting the swift overhead reduction efforts made in response for the tower demand declined and the benefit of improved operating performance. Loss per share for the quarter was $0.14 again in line with our guidance. Year-to-date earnings per share is $0.25 which includes the $0.34 income tax benefit associated with the Red Wolf acquisition. Transitioning to Slide 9, as previously, as noted previously the multi-year base load tower order was received in 2016. We were only reporting orders on volumes exceed to minimum contract amounts. And for the quarter, we had a new customer order for a prototype tower being produced in Q4 and additionally on the Weldments side of the business we had an up tick in orders and are encouraged that the mining under industrial markets are gaining momentum. Tower sold for the quarter were less than half of Q2 down to 42 and down 63% compared to the prior year. This reduction was partially offset by more complex higher material content towers. And as a result, sales were $16 million in line with guidance and down 57% year-over-year. Our customers are continuing to leave excess inventory that is accumulative over the past few quarters. We have taken swift actions to reduce our overhead and operating costs in response to the following volume decline in both of our plans. However, we are balancing this against our need to support 2018 production level increases and using their production decline as an opportunity to improve the capabilities of workforce and complete our expansion project. Operating loss was $1.5 million and the segment had the small EBITDA loss during the quarter. Despite the Q3 softness, year-to-date EBITDA margins remain near 11%. Our objectives haven't changed as previously mentioned, we continue to focus on improving production processes and assisting our customers with cost out efforts. We are expecting to ramp up enabling expansion and efficiency investment in Q4. This is slower than originally planned, as we have intentionally slowed progress given our production volumes. But we continue to see this project has important to future performance as the expansion adds approximately 50 towers of capacity in a region of the country we are expected the strong near-term demand. The project will also improve plant flow and reduce future production risks. Let me continue to be focused on diversifying our customer base and building excess plant capacity. We are encouraged by a rebounding volumes in 2018, however our tower demand in Q4 represent a low point for the business and we expect revenues to be in the $4 million to $5 million range with the $4 million operating loss. Next Slide please, in our gearing business order growth continues to be strong with oil and gas customers with orders near $10.6 million up nearly 5 times over the prior year. Backlog is near $22 million and that will add up our year end 2016 amount. In Q3, we started to see the pull through of the increased order demand with revenue of $7.6 million up 65% year-over-year. The shipments levels were lower than previous guidance as you work through extended material lead times from our vendors and sizing the workforce to align with production levels. As a result of the volume increases and the productivity efforts, operating loss narrowed year-over-year to $400,000 from the $700,000 loss and generated positive EBTIDA. As I mentioned previously, we had a ramp up cost which we estimate at $300,000 to $400,000 of additional tooling, employee training and machine used support increased usage of sell manufacturing, which will enable further improvement in plant utilization. On the bottom left side of the slide, we show historical revenue by end market served oil and gas orders continue to be strong market for us and you can see that in 2014 at peak of oil prices, we shipped approximately $20 million of oil and gas gearing. Though we are leveraging our commercial organization and other markets and are generally seeing improvements across most end markets. The mining recovery is developing and we are seeing activities strengthen on our front end process and are optimistic for recovery next year. Our current objectives include the continued focus on CI events to improve our production flow, include the optimizing sales and improving our equipment uptime rates. We expected the EBITDA positive for the year and trending towards positive operating income. We've made steady progress on our environmental remediation of our ideal gearing facility. We are optimistic that our remediation efforts will conclude in Q4 which could result in a release of the portion of our environmental reserve. Following this remediation, we will look to complete our restructuring effort that was started in 2014 by starting the facility and knowing our operating cost further. Our Q4 outlook shows continued top-line growth with revenues in the $9.5 million range, leverage will improve on the additional sales and we expect to generate EBITDA in the 7% to 9% range and have positive operating income. Moving to Slide 11, our process systems segment which consists Red Wolf and our CNG business, took $5.3 million of orders, a 20% increase sequentially over last quarter. Orders from gas turbine customers are flat, however improvements in mining equipment demand and the addition of a new oil and gas customer led to the quarter-over-quarter improvement. CNG orders were zero for the quarter given the lack of diesel to natural gas spread, which is paramount to the economics of the CNG equipment demand. Sales were $6.1 million up from $3 million in Q2 as we had more stable deliveries of our natural gas content orders and the shipment of the stock CNG unit. And EBITDA improved during the quarter to $0.6 million, $1.2 million improvement over Q2 primarily driven by increased volume. Our focus continues to be on the integration of the Red Wolf business and how we leverage competencies further into the gas turbine and adjacent markets. And we are evaluating our procurement processes to support further scaling of the business. We expect Q4 sales to be in the $5.5 million to $6 million range with the breakeven EBITDA. Next Slide please. Our cash conversion cycle was flat with Q2 and is within and expected range given the lower level deposits that we receive from customers as of 930. DSO was down to 29 days from 45 last quarter, which is often driven by the timing of the customer receipts. And we are currently encouraged by our inventory management. Consistent inventory returns near 8 indicate strong performance by our segments given our typical production cycle times. Operating working capital decreased from $23 million last quarter to $15.5 million in Q3 primarily resulted the decline in volume levels. This is visible on the operating working capital historical trend chart on the right side of the slide, where operating working capital $0.01 per dollar sales was flat at $0.13. I'm expecting our $12.31 working capital dollars to be near Q3 levels and within working capital inventories, inventory levels are expected to rise to the increased Q1 tower production volumes, but that should be funded by increased customer deposits. Borrowings under our $25 million line of credit with CIBC totaled $7.8 million for the quarter down from $13.7 million at 630. Despite the lower inventory levels in the business we had an additional $12 million of availability into the line, primarily driven by $10 million of fixed assets that are included in our borrowing base. We expect our availability under the line to be sufficient as we manage through a challenging Q4 and the Q1 ramp up production. We expect to receive deposits from our customers in Q4; we would expect this deposit balance to increase three accent to year end. CapEx slowed to $1.7 million in Q3 and is approximately $6 million for the year. The Abilene expansion and efficiency investments are nearing completion and remain on track for full year CapEx in the $7 million to $8 million range. And as we look into 2018, we are managing the CapEx spending culture our historical norm near 2% of revenue and we're expecting the capital to be allocated based on further improving our production processes or supporting profitable gearing growth. That concludes my remarks and I'll turn the call back to Stephanie.